I have got a problem when I try to control another Windows application using my own C# application.
The requirement is like this. The "another application" is a business software which our company have bought. We want to develop an application to fill text boxes and simulate mouse clicking. All text input is from a certain XML file.
I have tried to approach such function with SendMessage and SendWait function call. Problem is in some cases or at some end user's laptop, the text filling is not correct. Meanwhile, the mouse clicking will be fail in some other cases.
My imagination of the reason cause is synchronisation problems with call SendMessage. But I have no idea how to fix it. Is there any suggestion or solutions?
Looking forward your reply.
SendMessage and SendWait will always have those sorts of issues (especially app-to-app), e.g. the user clicks someone on the screen at exactly the right/wrong time. Really the only way I know to reliably do this is by hooking onto the mouse/keyboard and take total control... its hard and painful.
Note: there are plenty of professional macro'ing software packages on the market (faking keyboard input, mouse movement, clicks etc). Some are very sophisticated with their own programming language and will possibly do what you want. Google "windows macroing software" and you will find heaps - I recommend you do you research, trial several packages til you find one you want and then purchase it.
Related
I need help. I made a WPF application. Its functionality is that it launches the application when it is launched. But if it is pinned to the taskbar, then a JumpList appears. From which you can also call other applications. I ran into this problem: I do not know how to make the program automatically pinned to the taskbar after the first launch. Please help someone. I read on microsoft's website, but it's not suitable for wpf. Please help with this.
Maybe there is some kind of library? Maybe there is a way with the registry?
Don't ask for support for pinning, here is why.
Microsoft goes in great length to prevent applications altering user preferences. Why? Because otherwise, every application would do it. Giving access to user preferences via API means developers start exploiting it. It means applications fighting for screen space. You install compnay A product and it unpins company B product.
If such API existed, that is malware.
And an API for only the calling executable is not viable, it would mean that somewhere deep in the operating system the function call to do it for any executable exists. And then somebody finds it and calls it directly. Besides, it has been a big trouble for Microsoft to decouple the shell as it is.
Instead, explorer handles it.
Further reading Why is there no programmatic access to the Start menu pin list?.
Some application do manage to pin.
Regardless of what, it is a bad practice.
It is not guaranteed to work, much less in the next Windows update.
One way is to mimic user input. It is hard to consider all cases (what if the taskbar is hidden, what if it is not in the usual place, what if explorer is not running, etc.), but you can imagine setting the pointer position and sending keys.
Another way would be to write directly to the list. You might have found out that the pinned items are at:
%AppData%\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Quick Launch\User Pinned\TaskBar
And they are regular, good old, shortcuts. And you could add your own. And it would not work.
Thus, the answer is "Please don't do it".
For a more detailed explanation, you can try to refer here.
I am developing a C# application. I am looking for a way to monitor different events in 3rd party applications.
Example 1: Calculator is running, and I want to know when the user has clicked on "=" button.
Example 2: Skype is running and I want to monitor when the user hits the "Call" button.
Example 3: Word is running and I want to monitor when the user opens the "Font" drop down list.
I am not looking for simple Mouse or Keyboard events.
Take a look at EventSpy, Both of those seams to do what you need.
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/11918/EventSpy
http://eventspy.codeplex.com/
You basically need to tap into the "Windows Messaging" loop. In order to properly filter the GAZILLION messages that come flying through you'll also need to be able to periodically scan through all of the active windows to see which ones (if any) are relevant to you.
Be aware that this whole subsystem of windows is a GIANT security hole. (I have not worked with it much since NT4 / W95/W98 days so they might have tried attempts to "secure" it since then so it might be even harder to get to than it used to be.
You're going to need a good ide / 3rd party tools to help you get started on your way to have some idea of what you're looking for.
In a "previous" life we used this basic technique to get ~4,000 workstations to install their own software, updates, patches, etc through monitoring for existence of certain windows, controls, etc and "injecting" messages into the Windows Messaging loop to control Application Setup Programs, configuration changes that were not stored in the registry, etc, etc...
How can I create a window which is fully apparent to the user but is not visible in screenshots. I know that this is possible since Neo SafeKeys (an onscreen keyboard to defeat keyloggers) does not appear in the screenshots taken by keylogging software I installed.
To give you an idea, the window is fully visible to the user, however when a screenshot is taken, the Neo SafeKeys window does not appear at all (as if it does not even exist).
Neo SafeKeys states that it uses an invisible protection layer above the window to protect against screenshots. I have searched all over the internet to see how can I reproduce this, to no avail. Does anybody know how this can be performed (windows which is visible to user but invisible in screenshots)?
What you can do is you can prevent the PrtScn key from doing anything when pressed. Take a look at this article while shows you how to do this.
What this article is doing is clearing out the clipboard. What you can do instead is capture the screen image and digitally remove your application, then put the revised image on the clipboard, thus giving the "Effect" of making your window transparent.
Also, you might want to look at this SO question which gives an alternative way to make your window just appear "blue", though its not easy to do.
Does anybody know how this can be performed (windows which is visible to user but invisible in screenshots)?
Use DirectX to render directly to the device.
In your C# application you can set up a global hook to monitor keyboard events. Then your application becomes the global handler for print screens. Now if another application managed screen prints natively, can't stop that, but anything running through windows, you can get at.
The WM_KEYBOARD_LL hook is one of the few global hooks that can be used in managed code because it doesn't require a DLL to be injected into every target.
For some code you can visit here:
Adam's Blog
Keep in mind that these are global hooks so you want to make sure nothing else (other applications) are effected. I've used these in the past as we hosted showing a power point in an application we worked on. Basically we didn't want the user to invoke any powerpoint menus or keyboard short cuts so we used a global hook. We always checked to see whether the users was in a certain area (screen) and in our application, otherwise we would effect other applications functionality (including our own!)
Microsoft Information:
Hooks Overview
There's this.....
visual cryptography
live example here
But this could be easily coded against by taking multiple screenshots and laying them overeachother and such...
If you are using Windows, and you can avoid that screenlogging happens, you can implement a nice solution like a virtual desktop to embed your process into it. When a process is running inside a virtual desktop it is possible to bypass an screenlogger tool that runs over win32 Api.
Check out this article so you can sneak a peek how to implement a nice solution to scape from screen and keyboard monitoring.
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/7392/Lock-Windows-Desktop?fid=62485&select=3139662&fr=101#xx0xx
How can I disable Print Screen functionality while my WPF application is running?
The use-case is that my client wants to avoid unnecessary replication of valuable patient-centric data from the outside world and they provide the physical security to keep people from taking data through non-digital means.
Okay, it is possible, and could indeed be useful if your application is deployed in an environment where a camera is not available to the user.
First of all, I used the RegisterHotKey and UnregisterHotKey API calls, documented here http://pinvoke.net/default.aspx/user32.RegisterHotKey as described in this rather old article here http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163713.aspx.
I registered the IDHOT_SNAPDESKTOP hotkey in the Window_Load event and unregistered it in the Window_Closed. Trying to do this in the constructor gave me problems getting a consistent handle with the WindowInteropHelper(this) method.
If you'd like to do more than just ignore the keys you can set up a windows message handler, making a kind of WndProc using,
HwndSource source = HwndSource.FromHwnd(<handle>);
source.AddHook(<WndProc>);
making the handle as described above, and the WndProc implementation yourself.
As yet, I don't know how to "not" handle the hot key and get windows to perform its normal behaviour except, of course, by unregistering the hotkeys.
Its not very elegant or "WPF" but it worked for me.
As #ghord comments
The use of EnsureHandle() looks useful for getting a handler in the constructor.
It's not possible to disable printing, and even if it were possible, it would be easily circumvented by a cell phone camera. Many are in the megapixel resolution range, making it quite easy for someone to get the information they want.
If you want to disable the Print Screen Key on your keyboard, Jodrell's answer gives a way of doing that (understanding that it's not going to keep people from printing, and a determined user will find a way around that).
Really, it all comes down to trust. If an employer can't trust their employees not to remove data that is already protected by law in most jurisdictions (HIPAA in the USA), then there's a bigger issue at stake.
Easy:
Windows.UI.ViewManagement.ApplicationView.GetForCurrentView().IsScreenCaptureEnabled = false;
Simply speaking, you cannot. "Print screen" just copies the pixels on the screen to the clipboard, and is not part of your application.
Basically you can hook to the ClipBoard events and then set the image copied to null if someone does it. So they can copy the image but it will be reset:
Have a look at this:
Clipboard event C#
Alternatively in a timer, check the content of the clip board and clear it as soon as it is set to a picture.
No, No way to do that. Even if you capture the Print Screen key in your application user might set focus to some other application and then do the Print screen(having your application on side etc.).
Only way would be to create a dummy application in background which captures all keystrokes using Keyboard Hooks and filters Print Screen, but that will happen for all applications not just yours. And moreover as George said user can use cellphone camera too!
I think Microsoft Rights Management System can help. Give it a try. Following is the link:
Microsoft Rights Management System
The only way I can think of is to use the native Windows API (SetWindowsHookEx) to catch all keystrokes and filter out the PrintScreen key. However this would involve creating a native (i.e. unmanaged) DLL to actually do the keystroke processing.
Is there a practical way to set the global status message in Pidgin for Windows from .NET?
Dbus is not available in the Windows version of Pidgin.
Searching SO and the net has revealed helpful tips such as "rewrite libpurple in C#", which might be a bit beyond my time/enthusiasm level for this project at least...
Thanks
how about writing a plugin, and have it expose a way for your other program to pass the status to it. Could be a file that you write the status to, or maybe a local tcp port (if you can do that in plugins).
Have you considered simply simulating keyboard input to the Pidgin window using C#?
You will need to find the Pidgin window programmatically and then set your status by sending simulated keyboard input to that window handle.
A good Microsoft example of how it was done with Calculator:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms171548.aspx
As I recall, Pidgin will set your status if you simply put the main window (buddy list) in focus, start typing, and then press Enter. Simulating this keyboard input should be quite straightforward.
A dirty solution (that future versions of Pidgin might break), yes, but certainly MUCH easier than writing a plug-in or making your own libpurple wrapper.