Related
I have the following string: "12345678901", and I want it to be formatted as "123.456.789-01",
I'm currently doing it like this:
string s = "12345678901";
string formatted = Int64.Parse(s).ToString("000.000.000-00"); // = "123.456.789-01"
Is there a better way of doing this, can I do this directly, without having to convert the string to int and back to string again?
Yes, you can reach your result without conversion to an integer and reformatting the integer to a string and it is even faster.
s = "12345678901";
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(s);
int pos = s.Length - 2;
if (pos > 0) sb.Insert(pos, "-");
pos -= 3;
while (pos > 0)
{
sb.Insert(pos, ".");
pos -= 3;
}
string formatted = sb.ToString();
This is more or less what madrereflection has told you in comments with the only difference that the example here uses StringBuilder to avoid the continuous rebuild of the string. From simple benchmark it is three times faster than the current approach but of course more code is required.
I have this string: ABCDEFGHIJ
I need to replace from position 4 to position 5 with the string ZX
It will look like this: ABCZXFGHIJ
But not to use with string.replace("DE","ZX") - I need to use with position
How can I do it?
string s = "ABCDEFGH";
s= s.Remove(3, 2).Insert(3, "ZX");
The easiest way to add and remove ranges in a string is to use the StringBuilder.
var theString = "ABCDEFGHIJ";
var aStringBuilder = new StringBuilder(theString);
aStringBuilder.Remove(3, 2);
aStringBuilder.Insert(3, "ZX");
theString = aStringBuilder.ToString();
An alternative is to use String.Substring, but I think the StringBuilder code gets more readable.
ReplaceAt(int index, int length, string replace)
Here's an extension method that doesn't use StringBuilder or Substring. This method also allows the replacement string to extend past the length of the source string.
//// str - the source string
//// index- the start location to replace at (0-based)
//// length - the number of characters to be removed before inserting
//// replace - the string that is replacing characters
public static string ReplaceAt(this string str, int index, int length, string replace)
{
return str.Remove(index, Math.Min(length, str.Length - index))
.Insert(index, replace);
}
When using this function, if you want the entire replacement string to replace as many characters as possible, then set length to the length of the replacement string:
"0123456789".ReplaceAt(7, 5, "Hello") = "0123456Hello"
Otherwise, you can specify the amount of characters that will be removed:
"0123456789".ReplaceAt(2, 2, "Hello") = "01Hello456789"
If you specify the length to be 0, then this function acts just like the insert function:
"0123456789".ReplaceAt(4, 0, "Hello") = "0123Hello456789"
I guess this is more efficient since the StringBuilder class need not be initialized and since it uses more basic operations. Please correct me if I am wrong. :)
If you care about performance, then the thing you want to avoid here are allocations. And if you're on .Net Core 2.1+, then you can, by using the string.Create method:
public static string ReplaceAt(this string str, int index, int length, string replace)
{
return string.Create(str.Length - length + replace.Length, (str, index, length, replace),
(span, state) =>
{
state.str.AsSpan().Slice(0, state.index).CopyTo(span);
state.replace.AsSpan().CopyTo(span.Slice(state.index));
state.str.AsSpan().Slice(state.index + state.length).CopyTo(span.Slice(state.index + state.replace.Length));
});
}
This approach is harder to understand than the alternatives, but it's the only one that will allocate only one object per call: the newly created string.
Use String.Substring() (details here) to cut left part, then your replacement, then right part. Play with indexes until you get it right :)
Something like:
string replacement=original.Substring(0,start)+
rep+original.Substring(start+rep.Length);
string s = "ABCDEFG";
string t = "st";
s = s.Remove(4, t.Length);
s = s.Insert(4, t);
As an extension method.
public static class StringBuilderExtension
{
public static string SubsituteString(this string OriginalStr, int index, int length, string SubsituteStr)
{
return new StringBuilder(OriginalStr).Remove(index, length).Insert(index, SubsituteStr).ToString();
}
}
You could try something link this:
string str = "ABCDEFGHIJ";
str = str.Substring(0, 2) + "ZX" + str.Substring(5);
Like other have mentioned the Substring() function is there for a reason:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string input = "ABCDEFGHIJ";
string output = input.Overwrite(3, "ZX"); // 4th position has index 3
// ABCZXFGHIJ
}
public static string Overwrite(this string text, int position, string new_text)
{
return text.Substring(0, position) + new_text + text.Substring(position + new_text.Length);
}
Also I timed this against the StringBuilder solution and got 900 tics vs. 875. So it is slightly slower.
Yet another
public static string ReplaceAtPosition(this string self, int position, string newValue)
{
return self.Remove(position, newValue.Length).Insert(position, newValue);
}
With the help of this post, I create following function with additional length checks
public string ReplaceStringByIndex(string original, string replaceWith, int replaceIndex)
{
if (original.Length >= (replaceIndex + replaceWith.Length))
{
StringBuilder rev = new StringBuilder(original);
rev.Remove(replaceIndex, replaceWith.Length);
rev.Insert(replaceIndex, replaceWith);
return rev.ToString();
}
else
{
throw new Exception("Wrong lengths for the operation");
}
}
All others answers don't work if the string contains Unicode char (like Emojis) because an Unicode char weight more bytes than a char.
Example : the emoji '🎶' converted to bytes, will weight the equivalent of 2 chars. So, if the unicode char is placed at the beginning of your string, offset parameter will be shifted).
With this topic, i extend the StringInfo class to Replace by position keeping the Nick Miller's algorithm to avoid that :
public static class StringInfoUtils
{
public static string ReplaceByPosition(this string str, string replaceBy, int offset, int count)
{
return new StringInfo(str).ReplaceByPosition(replaceBy, offset, count).String;
}
public static StringInfo ReplaceByPosition(this StringInfo str, string replaceBy, int offset, int count)
{
return str.RemoveByTextElements(offset, count).InsertByTextElements(offset, replaceBy);
}
public static StringInfo RemoveByTextElements(this StringInfo str, int offset, int count)
{
return new StringInfo(string.Concat(
str.SubstringByTextElements(0, offset),
offset + count < str.LengthInTextElements
? str.SubstringByTextElements(offset + count, str.LengthInTextElements - count - offset)
: ""
));
}
public static StringInfo InsertByTextElements(this StringInfo str, int offset, string insertStr)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(str?.String))
return new StringInfo(insertStr);
return new StringInfo(string.Concat(
str.SubstringByTextElements(0, offset),
insertStr,
str.LengthInTextElements - offset > 0 ? str.SubstringByTextElements(offset, str.LengthInTextElements - offset) : ""
));
}
}
string myString = "ABCDEFGHIJ";
string modifiedString = new StringBuilder(myString){[3]='Z', [4]='X'}.ToString();
Let me explain my solution.
Given the problem statement of altering a string in its two specific position (“position 4 to position 5”) with two character ‘Z’ and ‘X’ and the ask is to use the position index to alter the string and not string Replace() method(may be because of the possibility of repetition of some characters in the actual string), I would prefer to use minimalist approach to achieve the goal over using Substring() and string Concat() or string Remove() and Insert() approach. Though all those solutions will serve the purpose in attaining the same goal, but it just depends on personal choice and philosophy of settling with minimalist approach.
Coming back to my solution mention above, if we take a closer look of string and StringBuilder, both of them internally treats a given string as an array of characters. If we look at the implementation of StringBuilder it maintains an internal variable something like “internal char[] m_ChunkChars;” to capture the given string. Now since this is an internal variable, we cannot directly access the same. For external world, to be able to access and alter that character array, StringBuilder exposes them through indexer property which looks something like below
[IndexerName("Chars")]
public char this[int index]
{
get
{
StringBuilder stringBuilder = this;
do
{
// … some code
return stringBuilder.m_ChunkChars[index1];
// … some more code
}
}
set
{
StringBuilder stringBuilder = this;
do
{
//… some code
stringBuilder.m_ChunkChars[index1] = value;
return;
// …. Some more code
}
}
}
My solution mentioned above leverage this indexer capability to directly alter the internally maintained character array which IMO is efficient and minimalist.
BTW; we can rewrite the above solution more elaborately something like below
string myString = "ABCDEFGHIJ";
StringBuilder tempString = new StringBuilder(myString);
tempString[3] = 'Z';
tempString[4] = 'X';
string modifiedString = tempString.ToString();
In this context also would like to mention that in case of string it also have indexer property as a means to expose its internal character array, but in this case it only has Getter property (and no Setter) as string is immutable in nature. And that is why we need to use StringBuilder to alter the character array.
[IndexerName("Chars")]
public extern char this[int index] { [SecuritySafeCritical, __DynamicallyInvokable, MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.InternalCall)] get; }
And last but not the least this solution is only best fit for this specific problem where the ask is to replace only few characters with a known position index upfront. It may not be the best fit when the requirement is to alter a fairly lengthy string i.e. number of characters to alter are large in numbers.
I was looking for a solution with following requirements:
use only a single, one-line expression
use only system builtin methods (no custom implemented utility)
Solution 1
The solution that best suits me is this:
// replace `oldString[i]` with `c`
string newString = new StringBuilder(oldString).Replace(oldString[i], c, i, 1).ToString();
This uses StringBuilder.Replace(oldChar, newChar, position, count)
Solution 2
The other solution that satisfies my requirements is to use Substring with concatenation:
string newString = oldStr.Substring(0, i) + c + oldString.Substring(i+1, oldString.Length);
This is OK too. I guess it's not as efficient as the first one performance wise (due to unnecessary string concatenation). But premature optimization is the root of all evil.
So pick the one that you like the most :)
hello this code helps me:
var theString = "ABCDEFGHIJ";
var aStringBuilder = new StringBuilder(theString);
aStringBuilder.Remove(3, 2);
aStringBuilder.Insert(3, "ZX");
theString = aStringBuilder.ToString();
It's better to use the String.substr().
Like this:
ReplString = GivenStr.substr(0, PostostarRelStr)
+ GivenStr(PostostarRelStr, ReplString.lenght());
String timestamp = "2019-09-18 21.42.05.000705";
String sub1 = timestamp.substring(0, 19).replace('.', ':');
String sub2 = timestamp.substring(19, timestamp.length());
System.out.println("Original String "+ timestamp);
System.out.println("Replaced Value "+ sub1+sub2);
Here is a simple extension method:
public static class StringBuilderExtensions
{
public static StringBuilder Replace(this StringBuilder sb, int position, string newString)
=> sb.Replace(position, newString.Length, newString);
public static StringBuilder Replace(this StringBuilder sb, int position, int length, string newString)
=> (newString.Length <= length)
? sb.Remove(position, newString.Length).Insert(position, newString)
: sb.Remove(position, length).Insert(position, newString.Substring(0, length));
}
Use it like this:
var theString = new string(' ', 10);
var sb = new StringBuilder(theString);
sb.Replace(5, "foo");
return sb.ToString();
I do this
Dim QTT As Double
If IsDBNull(dr.Item(7)) Then
QTT = 0
Else
Dim value As String = dr.Item(7).ToString()
Dim posicpoint As Integer = value.LastIndexOf(".")
If posicpoint > 0 Then
Dim v As New Text.StringBuilder(value)
v.Remove(posicpoint, 1)
v.Insert(posicpoint, ",")
QTT = Convert.ToDouble(v.ToString())
Else
QTT = Convert.ToDouble(dr.Item(7).ToString())
End If
Console.WriteLine(QTT.ToString())
End If
Suppose we know the index of string to be replace.
string s = "ABCDEFGDEJ";
string z = "DE";
int i = s.IndexOf(z);
if(i == 3)
s = s.Remove(3,z.Length).Insert(3,"ZX");
//s = ABCZXFGDEJ
I believe the simplest way would be this:(without stringbuilder)
string myString = "ABCDEFGHIJ";
char[] replacementChars = {'Z', 'X'};
byte j = 0;
for (byte i = 3; i <= 4; i++, j++)
{
myString = myString.Replace(myString[i], replacementChars[j]);
}
This works because a variable of type string can be treated as an array of char variables.
You can, for example refer to the second character of a string variable with name "myString" as myString[1]
I have a string of text and want to ensure that it contains at most one single occurrence of a specific character (,). Therefore I want to keep the first one, but simply remove all further occurrences of that character.
How could I do this the most elegant way using C#?
This works, but not the most elegant for sure :-)
string a = "12,34,56,789";
int pos = 1 + a.IndexOf(',');
return a.Substring(0, pos) + a.Substring(pos).Replace(",", string.Empty);
You could use a counter variable and a StringBuilder to create the new string efficiently:
var sb = new StringBuilder(text.Length);
int maxCount = 1;
int currentCount = 0;
char specialChar = ',';
foreach(char c in text)
if(c != specialChar || ++currentCount <= maxCount)
sb.Append(c);
text = sb.ToString();
This approach is not the shortest but it's efficient and you can specify the char-count to keep.
Here's a more "elegant" way using LINQ:
int commasFound = 0; int maxCommas = 1;
text = new string(text.Where(c => c != ',' || ++commasFound <= maxCommas).ToArray());
I don't like it because it requires to modify a variable from a query, so it's causing a side-effect.
Regular expressions are elegant, right?
Regex.Replace("Eats, shoots, and leaves.", #"(?<=,.*),", "");
This replaces every comma, as long as there is a comma before it, with nothing.
(Actually, it's probably not elegant - it may only be one line of code, but it may also be O(n^2)...)
If you don't deal with large strings and you reaaaaaaly like Linq oneliners:
public static string KeepFirstOccurence (this string #string, char #char)
{
var index = #string.IndexOf(#char);
return String.Concat(String.Concat(#string.TakeWhile(x => #string.IndexOf(x) < index + 1)), String.Concat(#string.SkipWhile(x=>#string.IndexOf(x) < index)).Replace(#char.ToString(), ""));
}
You could write a function like the following one that would split the string into two sections based on the location of what you were searching (via the String.Split() method) for and it would only remove matches from the second section (using String.Replace()) :
public static string RemoveAllButFirst(string s, string stuffToRemove)
{
// Check if the stuff to replace exists and if not, return the original string
var locationOfStuff = s.IndexOf(stuffToRemove);
if (locationOfStuff < 0)
{
return s;
}
// Calculate where to pull the first string from and then replace the rest of the string
var splitLocation = locationOfStuff + stuffToRemove.Length;
return s.Substring(0, splitLocation) + (s.Substring(splitLocation)).Replace(stuffToRemove,"");
}
You could simply call it by using :
var output = RemoveAllButFirst(input,",");
A prettier approach might actually involve building an extension method that handled this a bit more cleanly :
public static class StringExtensions
{
public static string RemoveAllButFirst(this string s, string stuffToRemove)
{
// Check if the stuff to replace exists and if not, return the
// original string
var locationOfStuff = s.IndexOf(stuffToRemove);
if (locationOfStuff < 0)
{
return s;
}
// Calculate where to pull the first string from and then replace the rest of the string
var splitLocation = locationOfStuff + stuffToRemove.Length;
return s.Substring(0, splitLocation) + (s.Substring(splitLocation)).Replace(stuffToRemove,"");
}
}
which would be called via :
var output = input.RemoveAllButFirst(",");
You can see a working example of it here.
static string KeepFirstOccurance(this string str, char c)
{
int charposition = str.IndexOf(c);
return str.Substring(0, charposition + 1) +
str.Substring(charposition, str.Length - charposition)
.Replace(c, ' ').Trim();
}
Pretty short with Linq; split string into chars, keep distinct set and join back to a string.
text = string.Join("", text.Select(c => c).Distinct());
I have this string: ABCDEFGHIJ
I need to replace from position 4 to position 5 with the string ZX
It will look like this: ABCZXFGHIJ
But not to use with string.replace("DE","ZX") - I need to use with position
How can I do it?
string s = "ABCDEFGH";
s= s.Remove(3, 2).Insert(3, "ZX");
The easiest way to add and remove ranges in a string is to use the StringBuilder.
var theString = "ABCDEFGHIJ";
var aStringBuilder = new StringBuilder(theString);
aStringBuilder.Remove(3, 2);
aStringBuilder.Insert(3, "ZX");
theString = aStringBuilder.ToString();
An alternative is to use String.Substring, but I think the StringBuilder code gets more readable.
ReplaceAt(int index, int length, string replace)
Here's an extension method that doesn't use StringBuilder or Substring. This method also allows the replacement string to extend past the length of the source string.
//// str - the source string
//// index- the start location to replace at (0-based)
//// length - the number of characters to be removed before inserting
//// replace - the string that is replacing characters
public static string ReplaceAt(this string str, int index, int length, string replace)
{
return str.Remove(index, Math.Min(length, str.Length - index))
.Insert(index, replace);
}
When using this function, if you want the entire replacement string to replace as many characters as possible, then set length to the length of the replacement string:
"0123456789".ReplaceAt(7, 5, "Hello") = "0123456Hello"
Otherwise, you can specify the amount of characters that will be removed:
"0123456789".ReplaceAt(2, 2, "Hello") = "01Hello456789"
If you specify the length to be 0, then this function acts just like the insert function:
"0123456789".ReplaceAt(4, 0, "Hello") = "0123Hello456789"
I guess this is more efficient since the StringBuilder class need not be initialized and since it uses more basic operations. Please correct me if I am wrong. :)
If you care about performance, then the thing you want to avoid here are allocations. And if you're on .Net Core 2.1+, then you can, by using the string.Create method:
public static string ReplaceAt(this string str, int index, int length, string replace)
{
return string.Create(str.Length - length + replace.Length, (str, index, length, replace),
(span, state) =>
{
state.str.AsSpan().Slice(0, state.index).CopyTo(span);
state.replace.AsSpan().CopyTo(span.Slice(state.index));
state.str.AsSpan().Slice(state.index + state.length).CopyTo(span.Slice(state.index + state.replace.Length));
});
}
This approach is harder to understand than the alternatives, but it's the only one that will allocate only one object per call: the newly created string.
Use String.Substring() (details here) to cut left part, then your replacement, then right part. Play with indexes until you get it right :)
Something like:
string replacement=original.Substring(0,start)+
rep+original.Substring(start+rep.Length);
string s = "ABCDEFG";
string t = "st";
s = s.Remove(4, t.Length);
s = s.Insert(4, t);
As an extension method.
public static class StringBuilderExtension
{
public static string SubsituteString(this string OriginalStr, int index, int length, string SubsituteStr)
{
return new StringBuilder(OriginalStr).Remove(index, length).Insert(index, SubsituteStr).ToString();
}
}
You could try something link this:
string str = "ABCDEFGHIJ";
str = str.Substring(0, 2) + "ZX" + str.Substring(5);
Like other have mentioned the Substring() function is there for a reason:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string input = "ABCDEFGHIJ";
string output = input.Overwrite(3, "ZX"); // 4th position has index 3
// ABCZXFGHIJ
}
public static string Overwrite(this string text, int position, string new_text)
{
return text.Substring(0, position) + new_text + text.Substring(position + new_text.Length);
}
Also I timed this against the StringBuilder solution and got 900 tics vs. 875. So it is slightly slower.
Yet another
public static string ReplaceAtPosition(this string self, int position, string newValue)
{
return self.Remove(position, newValue.Length).Insert(position, newValue);
}
With the help of this post, I create following function with additional length checks
public string ReplaceStringByIndex(string original, string replaceWith, int replaceIndex)
{
if (original.Length >= (replaceIndex + replaceWith.Length))
{
StringBuilder rev = new StringBuilder(original);
rev.Remove(replaceIndex, replaceWith.Length);
rev.Insert(replaceIndex, replaceWith);
return rev.ToString();
}
else
{
throw new Exception("Wrong lengths for the operation");
}
}
All others answers don't work if the string contains Unicode char (like Emojis) because an Unicode char weight more bytes than a char.
Example : the emoji '🎶' converted to bytes, will weight the equivalent of 2 chars. So, if the unicode char is placed at the beginning of your string, offset parameter will be shifted).
With this topic, i extend the StringInfo class to Replace by position keeping the Nick Miller's algorithm to avoid that :
public static class StringInfoUtils
{
public static string ReplaceByPosition(this string str, string replaceBy, int offset, int count)
{
return new StringInfo(str).ReplaceByPosition(replaceBy, offset, count).String;
}
public static StringInfo ReplaceByPosition(this StringInfo str, string replaceBy, int offset, int count)
{
return str.RemoveByTextElements(offset, count).InsertByTextElements(offset, replaceBy);
}
public static StringInfo RemoveByTextElements(this StringInfo str, int offset, int count)
{
return new StringInfo(string.Concat(
str.SubstringByTextElements(0, offset),
offset + count < str.LengthInTextElements
? str.SubstringByTextElements(offset + count, str.LengthInTextElements - count - offset)
: ""
));
}
public static StringInfo InsertByTextElements(this StringInfo str, int offset, string insertStr)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(str?.String))
return new StringInfo(insertStr);
return new StringInfo(string.Concat(
str.SubstringByTextElements(0, offset),
insertStr,
str.LengthInTextElements - offset > 0 ? str.SubstringByTextElements(offset, str.LengthInTextElements - offset) : ""
));
}
}
string myString = "ABCDEFGHIJ";
string modifiedString = new StringBuilder(myString){[3]='Z', [4]='X'}.ToString();
Let me explain my solution.
Given the problem statement of altering a string in its two specific position (“position 4 to position 5”) with two character ‘Z’ and ‘X’ and the ask is to use the position index to alter the string and not string Replace() method(may be because of the possibility of repetition of some characters in the actual string), I would prefer to use minimalist approach to achieve the goal over using Substring() and string Concat() or string Remove() and Insert() approach. Though all those solutions will serve the purpose in attaining the same goal, but it just depends on personal choice and philosophy of settling with minimalist approach.
Coming back to my solution mention above, if we take a closer look of string and StringBuilder, both of them internally treats a given string as an array of characters. If we look at the implementation of StringBuilder it maintains an internal variable something like “internal char[] m_ChunkChars;” to capture the given string. Now since this is an internal variable, we cannot directly access the same. For external world, to be able to access and alter that character array, StringBuilder exposes them through indexer property which looks something like below
[IndexerName("Chars")]
public char this[int index]
{
get
{
StringBuilder stringBuilder = this;
do
{
// … some code
return stringBuilder.m_ChunkChars[index1];
// … some more code
}
}
set
{
StringBuilder stringBuilder = this;
do
{
//… some code
stringBuilder.m_ChunkChars[index1] = value;
return;
// …. Some more code
}
}
}
My solution mentioned above leverage this indexer capability to directly alter the internally maintained character array which IMO is efficient and minimalist.
BTW; we can rewrite the above solution more elaborately something like below
string myString = "ABCDEFGHIJ";
StringBuilder tempString = new StringBuilder(myString);
tempString[3] = 'Z';
tempString[4] = 'X';
string modifiedString = tempString.ToString();
In this context also would like to mention that in case of string it also have indexer property as a means to expose its internal character array, but in this case it only has Getter property (and no Setter) as string is immutable in nature. And that is why we need to use StringBuilder to alter the character array.
[IndexerName("Chars")]
public extern char this[int index] { [SecuritySafeCritical, __DynamicallyInvokable, MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.InternalCall)] get; }
And last but not the least this solution is only best fit for this specific problem where the ask is to replace only few characters with a known position index upfront. It may not be the best fit when the requirement is to alter a fairly lengthy string i.e. number of characters to alter are large in numbers.
I was looking for a solution with following requirements:
use only a single, one-line expression
use only system builtin methods (no custom implemented utility)
Solution 1
The solution that best suits me is this:
// replace `oldString[i]` with `c`
string newString = new StringBuilder(oldString).Replace(oldString[i], c, i, 1).ToString();
This uses StringBuilder.Replace(oldChar, newChar, position, count)
Solution 2
The other solution that satisfies my requirements is to use Substring with concatenation:
string newString = oldStr.Substring(0, i) + c + oldString.Substring(i+1, oldString.Length);
This is OK too. I guess it's not as efficient as the first one performance wise (due to unnecessary string concatenation). But premature optimization is the root of all evil.
So pick the one that you like the most :)
hello this code helps me:
var theString = "ABCDEFGHIJ";
var aStringBuilder = new StringBuilder(theString);
aStringBuilder.Remove(3, 2);
aStringBuilder.Insert(3, "ZX");
theString = aStringBuilder.ToString();
It's better to use the String.substr().
Like this:
ReplString = GivenStr.substr(0, PostostarRelStr)
+ GivenStr(PostostarRelStr, ReplString.lenght());
String timestamp = "2019-09-18 21.42.05.000705";
String sub1 = timestamp.substring(0, 19).replace('.', ':');
String sub2 = timestamp.substring(19, timestamp.length());
System.out.println("Original String "+ timestamp);
System.out.println("Replaced Value "+ sub1+sub2);
Here is a simple extension method:
public static class StringBuilderExtensions
{
public static StringBuilder Replace(this StringBuilder sb, int position, string newString)
=> sb.Replace(position, newString.Length, newString);
public static StringBuilder Replace(this StringBuilder sb, int position, int length, string newString)
=> (newString.Length <= length)
? sb.Remove(position, newString.Length).Insert(position, newString)
: sb.Remove(position, length).Insert(position, newString.Substring(0, length));
}
Use it like this:
var theString = new string(' ', 10);
var sb = new StringBuilder(theString);
sb.Replace(5, "foo");
return sb.ToString();
I do this
Dim QTT As Double
If IsDBNull(dr.Item(7)) Then
QTT = 0
Else
Dim value As String = dr.Item(7).ToString()
Dim posicpoint As Integer = value.LastIndexOf(".")
If posicpoint > 0 Then
Dim v As New Text.StringBuilder(value)
v.Remove(posicpoint, 1)
v.Insert(posicpoint, ",")
QTT = Convert.ToDouble(v.ToString())
Else
QTT = Convert.ToDouble(dr.Item(7).ToString())
End If
Console.WriteLine(QTT.ToString())
End If
Suppose we know the index of string to be replace.
string s = "ABCDEFGDEJ";
string z = "DE";
int i = s.IndexOf(z);
if(i == 3)
s = s.Remove(3,z.Length).Insert(3,"ZX");
//s = ABCZXFGDEJ
I believe the simplest way would be this:(without stringbuilder)
string myString = "ABCDEFGHIJ";
char[] replacementChars = {'Z', 'X'};
byte j = 0;
for (byte i = 3; i <= 4; i++, j++)
{
myString = myString.Replace(myString[i], replacementChars[j]);
}
This works because a variable of type string can be treated as an array of char variables.
You can, for example refer to the second character of a string variable with name "myString" as myString[1]
I have a compressed string value I'm extracting from an import file. I need to format this into a parcel number, which is formatted as follows: ##-##-##-###-###. So therefore, the string "410151000640" should become "41-01-51-000-640". I can do this with the following code:
String.Format("{0:##-##-##-###-###}", Convert.ToInt64("410151000640"));
However, The string may not be all numbers; it could have a letter or two in there, and thus the conversion to the int will fail. Is there a way to do this on a string so every character, regardless of if it is a number or letter, will fit into the format correctly?
Regex.Replace("410151000640", #"^(.{2})(.{2})(.{2})(.{3})(.{3})$", "$1-$2-$3-$4-$5");
Or the slightly shorter version
Regex.Replace("410151000640", #"^(..)(..)(..)(...)(...)$", "$1-$2-$3-$4-$5");
I would approach this by having your own formatting method, as long as you know that the "Parcel Number" always conforms to a specific rule.
public static string FormatParcelNumber(string input)
{
if(input.length != 12)
throw new FormatException("Invalid parcel number. Must be 12 characters");
return String.Format("{0}-{1}-{2}-{3}-{4}",
input.Substring(0,2),
input.Substring(2,2),
input.Substring(4,2),
input.Substring(6,3),
input.Substring(9,3));
}
This should work in your case:
string value = "410151000640";
for( int i = 2; i < value.Length; i+=3){
value = value.Insert( i, "-");
}
Now value contains the string with dashes inserted.
EDIT
I just now saw that you didn't have dashes between every second number all the way, to this will require a small tweak (and makes it a bit more clumsy also I'm afraid)
string value = "410151000640";
for( int i = 2; i < value.Length-1; i+=3){
if( value.Count( c => c == '-') >= 3) i++;
value = value.Insert( i, "-");
}
If its part of UI you can use MaskedTextProvider in System.ComponentModel
MaskedTextProvider prov = new MaskedTextProvider("aa-aa-aa-aaa-aaa");
prov.Set("41x151000a40");
string result = prov.ToDisplayString();
Here is a simple extension method with some utility:
public static string WithMask(this string s, string mask)
{
var slen = Math.Min(s.Length, mask.Length);
var charArray = new char[mask.Length];
var sPos = s.Length - 1;
for (var i = mask.Length - 1; i >= 0 && sPos >= 0;)
if (mask[i] == '#') charArray[i--] = s[sPos--];
else
charArray[i] = mask[i--];
return new string(charArray);
}
Use it as follows:
var s = "276000017812008";
var mask = "###-##-##-##-###-###";
var dashedS = s.WithMask(mask);
You can use it with any string and any character other than # in the mask will be inserted. The mask will work from right to left. You can tweak it to go the other way if you want.
Have fun.
If i understodd you correctly youre looking for a function that removes all letters from a string, aren't you?
I have created this on the fly, maybe you can convert it into c# if it's what you're looking for:
Dim str As String = "410151000vb640"
str = String.Format("{0:##-##-##-###-###}", Convert.ToInt64(MakeNumber(str)))
Public Function MakeNumber(ByVal stringInt As String) As String
Dim sb As New System.Text.StringBuilder
For i As Int32 = 0 To stringInt.Length - 1
If Char.IsDigit(stringInt(i)) Then
sb.Append(stringInt(i))
End If
Next
Return sb.ToString
End Function