Develop Reference

Prism.WPF: Change MainWindow Window.Effect on Navigation

The application is a Prism Application in WPF using C#.
I am attempting to assign a BlurEffect to the Window.Effect property when a button is clicked on the navigation menu.
I have the Window.Effect bound to a property in my viewmodel.
<Window ... other properties ..
Effect = {Binding Fuzzy}>
and the Fuzzy property in the ViewModel.
private Effect _fuzzy;
public Effect Fuzzy { get => _fuzzy; set => SetProperty(ref _fuzzy, value); }
What I am attempting to implement is that when a button is clicked on the navigation menu that the window will blur while a UserControl is loading.
I have tried to implement the change in the Navigate method.
private void Navigate(string viewName)
{
PerformBlur();
_regionManager.RequestNavigate("ContentRegion", viewName);
}
private void PerformBlur()
{
BlurEffect blur = new BlurEffect();
blur.Radius = 4;
var ef = blur;
_fuzzy = ef; //I've tried Fuzzy = ef too
}
But that doesn't work.
I need to make the change to the window effect before it attempts to navigate, and I haven't been able to figure out how to make that happen. I have a feeling that the easiest way to do this would be to use a click event rather than a command, and then call the command in the viewmodel from the codebehind. However, that doesn't seem to be the proper implementation when using MVVM. Any suggestions on how to implement this functionality would be greatly appreciated.
(Bonus points if you can tell me how to animate the blur. lol)

I have a feeling that the easiest way to do this would be to use a click event rather than a command, and then call the command in the viewmodel from the codebehind. However, that doesn't seem to be the proper implementation when using MVVM.
Invoking the command programmatically from the code-behind of the view is not any worse than invoking it from the XAML markup of the very same view as far as MVVM is concerned.
MVVM is not about eliminating code from the views. It's about separation of concerns. You can implement an entire view programmtically in a C# without using XAML at all and still be fully compliant with MVVM.
Trying to do fairly complex stuff in XAML just because you possible can is generally considered as an antipattern. Remember that XAML is a markup language. C# is a much more expressive and concise language so if you can solve your issue by writing some code, then this is most probably what you should do.

Taking a look at the prism source code, I can see iregionmanager is full of abstracted interfaces.
( Wow. I don't know why it still surprises me but prism is very complicated ).
https://github.com/PrismLibrary/Prism/blob/master/src/Wpf/Prism.Wpf/Regions/IRegion.cs
That includes IRegionNavigationService
https://github.com/PrismLibrary/Prism/blob/master/src/Wpf/Prism.Wpf/Regions/IRegionNavigationService.cs
You could therefore override pretty much any functionality you like, if you wanted to.
Notice though, the two events :
/// <summary>
/// Raised when the region is about to be navigated to content.
/// </summary>
event EventHandler<RegionNavigationEventArgs> Navigating;
/// <summary>
/// Raised when the region is navigated to content.
/// </summary>
event EventHandler<RegionNavigationEventArgs> Navigated;
Looks to me like "all" you need is a reference to your region navigation service in the view.
Handle those two events to set blur then remove blur.
You could then do navigation in code behind or viewmodel. Whichever suits.
If you wanted to decouple viewmodel from view, you could use the eventaggregator.
There is another option though.
You don't explain exactly what you have there. So let's imagine and consider a better way to do this.
Say you have a set content of a set control you're always navigating. That's being switched out as you navigate for a new view whose datacontext is a new viewmodel.
You could bind an attached property from the window to the datacontext of that.
In that property you can have a change callback.
In a base viewmodel you could add an IsLoaded bool property which is initialy false.
When your dependency property callback returns null or false then you blur.
You change the viewmodel property to false in the current viewmodel when you start to navigate. The window blurs. The content is switched out and you get a new viewmodel. Once navigation completes you set that ILoaded true. You callback un blurs the window.

WPF Adding tab items to tab control from multiple view models

On my MainWindow I have a TabControl whose ItemSource is bound to an ObservableCollection<TabItem> In it's View Model (vmMainWindow).
On the Main Window I also have a Menu with 2 MenuItems, (Albums, Artists)
I have created a Page and ViewModel for both Albums and Artists.
When a MenuItem is clicked, using a RelayCommand I am creating a Frame to hold the relevent Page bound to it's respective View Model. Then i create a new TabItem set it's Content to the new Frame then add the new TabItem to the ObservableCollection<TabItem>.
void MenuItemClick(object parameter)
{
switch (parameter)
{
case "Albums":
Frame albumsFrame = new Frame { Content = new pgAlbums { DataContext = new vmAlbums() } };
TabCollection.Add(new TabItem { Header = "Albums", Content = albumsFrame , IsSelected = true });
break;
case "Artists":
Frame artistsFrame = new Frame { Content = new pgArtists { DataContext = new vmArtists() } };
TabCollection.Add(new TabItem { Header = "Artists", Content = artistsFrame , IsSelected = true });
break;
}
}
What i would like to do is to be able to add tabs to the ObservableCollection<TabItem> the same way from the other Page's View Models but I don't have access to the TabCollection from them. I either need somewhere global to place it instead or somehow share it between View Models.
I am aware I am going about this all the wrong way so i'm putting it out here so someone can guide me in the right direction about what to do. I'm a complete newbie to MVVM, i have only experience in Winforms, but want to move on from that.

You could use an EventAggregator or a Messenger class to send a message that the other view model subscribes to. Please refer to the following links for more information about the concept.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/jj694937.aspx
http://dotnetpattern.com/mvvm-light-messenger
https://blog.magnusmontin.net/2014/02/28/using-the-event-aggregator-pattern-to-communicate-between-view-models/
The other options would be to either inject both view models with a shared service or keep a strong reference to the first view model from the second one and raise an event.
The benefit of using an event aggregator or a messenger is that you avoid introducing a tight coupling between publisher of the event and the subscriber which should make the application easier to maintain. Both the publisher and the subscriber of the event or message knows only about the event aggregator or messenger but they don't know anything about each other.
By the way, you shouldn't create TabItems or any other visual elements in a view model. You should create instances of data objects that may be represented by visual elements such as TabItems in the view.

How do I clean up the views inside a TabControl when the parent view is unloaded?

I have a view (I'll call it MainView) that contains a TabControl. The views that make up the TabItems are created using prism view discovery in MainView's ViewModel. Each of the views that are "tabs" have some cleanup that needs to be done (detaching event handlers, etc.) when I'm done with the tab control (i.e. during the MainView's Unloaded event). However, I can't do the cleanup with the Tab views' Unloaded event, as this is called when just switching tabs.
MainView is calling a method on its ViewModel when Unloaded fires, but that ViewModel does not have a reference to the Views or ViewModels that make up the tabs due to the way those views are registered. What is the proper way to clean up after my "discovered" tab views?

I have a similar situation, but we are using a Dock control where the views are loaded using Prism. So, in the Shell Views code behind unloaded event, we loop over the open Views and get the ViewModel for each view. All of our ViewModels inherit from a base ViewModel that has a virtual bool CanClose method that returns whether the view can close or not. The base ViewModel just returns true. This method is used to check if there are validation errors, unsaved changes, etc. So, then you would override this method and perform the clean up your talking about. If all of the views return true, then you could call the main shell viewmodel unload, if not then you can cancel the main view from unloading.
foreach (var doc in dockManager.Documents)
{
if (!doc.CanClose())
{
e.Cancel = true;
return;
}
}

We ended up using a message via the EventAggregator to clean up the sub-views.

I use Prism navigation in my application, and faced the same issue.
To address the problem, in the parent view model, in the OnNavigatedFrom method, I close all the views in the TabControl's region:
public class ParentViewModel : INavigationAware
{
...
public void OnNavigatedFrom(NavigationContext navigationContext)
{
var region = RegionManager.Regions["TabsRegion"];
foreach (var view in region.Views)
region.Remove(view);
}
}

MVVM and control creation

Imagine a simple scenario with a WPF window containing a button and some clear space. Clicking the button creates a new custom/user control and places it somewhere randomly on the window.
Clicking one of these controls will remove it from the window.
So now I have a ViewModel ala MVVM which exposes an ICommand for the "create new" button, but where does the code to create the new control live? Each control will probably have its own ViewModel which will handle its deletion and positioning I guess.
Can it be achieved with no code behind on the window AND no real knowledge of the View by the ViewModel?

The code that causes the controls to be created lives inside your "main" ViewModel.
The code that actually creates the controls is the container.
So it would go something like:
void AddControlCommandExecuted() {
var container = // resolve your DI container here
// Now use the container to resolve your "child" view. For example,
// if using UnityContainer it could go like this:
var view = container.Resolve<ChildView>();
// Of course you can also resolve the ViewModel if your program is
// "ViewModel-first" instead of "View-first".
// Does the ChildViewModel need some properties to be set?
var viewModel = (ChildViewModel)view.DataContext;
viewModel.StringProperty = "blah";
// Now get a reference to the region in your View which will host
// the "child" views.
var regionManager = container.Resolve<IRegionManager>();
var region = regionManager.Regions["MyRegionName"];
// Finally add the view to the region. You can do it manually, you
// can use the concept of "navigation" if your MVVM framework has one
// (I 'm using Prism, which does), etc etc.
region.Add(view);
}
Update: When writing the answer, I forgot that not all MVVM frameworks have Regions as Prism does. So excuse the specificity of the code above, as it doesn't really change anything. You simply need to build something like the Region abstraction yourself. Let's see:
class MyViewModel {
public event EventHandler<ChildViewModelAddedEventArgs> ChildViewModelAdded;
}
MyView would then attach an event handler to this event, and pick up the ChildView instance from inside ChildViewModelAddedEventArgs so that it can be added to an ItemsControl it is the parent of without your ViewModel messing with such details.
Of course this means that you now need some code-behind, but this cannot be helped unless you are using a framework that provides such services itself.

This SHOULD be doable with some very careful databinding on an ItemsControl, not sure how you would achieve the layout, but you will have a parent view model containing a collection of child view models, layout would then be preformed by the ItemsControl. When the parent ViewModel created the child ViewModel, it should inject a RelayCommand as a lambda expression to remove and cleanup the child ViewModel from the parents collection.

Having trouble deciding how to wire up a UserControl with MVVM

I've been doing the best I can to try to stay true to the separation recommended by the MVVM pattern. One thing I haven't figure out how to do correctly has to do with initializing my UserControls.
My most recent example of this has to do with a library that I wrote to talk to some low-level hardware. That assembly happens to have a UserControl that I can simply drop into any GUI that uses this hardware. All that is necessary for it to work is to set a reference to the object that has access to the low level methods.
However, that's where my problem lies -- currently, the UserControl is added to the GUI via XAML, where I define the namespace and then add the UserControl to my window. Of course, I have no control over its creation at this point, so the default constructor gets called. The only way to set the necessary reference for hardware control involves calling a method in the UC to do so. The ViewModel could feasibly call a method in the Model, e.g. GetController(), and then call the method in the UserControl to set the reference accordingly. The GUI can pass a reference to the UserControl to the ViewModel when said GUI creates the ViewModel, but this violates MVVM because the ViewModel shouldn't know anything about this control.
Another way I could deal with this is to not create the UserControl in XAML, but instead do it all from code-behind. After the ViewModel gets initialized and retrieves an initialized UserControl (i.e. one that has the low-level object reference set), it can set the Content of my Window to the UserControl. However, this also violates MVVM -- is there a way to databind the Content of a Window, TabControl, or any other element to a UserControl?
I'd like to hear if anyone has had to deal with this before, and if they approached it the first or second way I have outlined here, or if they took a completely different approach. If what I have asked here is unclear, please let me know and I'll do my best to update it with more information, diagrams, etc.
UPDATE
Thanks for the responses, guys, but I must not have explained the problem very well. I already use RelayCommands within the UserControl's ViewModel to handle all of the calls to the hardware layer (Model) when the user clicks in the control in the UserControl itself. My problem is related to initially passing a reference to the UserControl so it can talk to the hardware layer.
If I create the UserControl directly in XAML, then I can't pass it this reference via a constructor because I can only use the default constructor. The solution I have in place right now does not look MVVM-compliant -- I had to name the UserControl in XAML, and then in the code-behind (i.e. for the View), I have to call a method that I had added to be able to set this reference. For example, I have a GUI UserControl that contains the diagnostics UserControl for my hardware:
partial class GUI : UserControl
{
private MainViewModel ViewModel { get; set; }
public GUI( Model.MainModel model)
{
InitializeComponent();
ViewModel = new MainViewModel( model, this.Dispatcher);
ViewModel.Initialize();
this.DataContext = ViewModel;
diagnostics_toolbar.SetViewModel( ViewModel);
user_control_in_xaml.SetHardwareConnection( model.Connection);
}
}
where the outer class is the main GUI UserControl, and user_control_in_xaml is the UserControl I had to name in the GUI's XAML.
Looking at this again, I realize that it's probably okay to go with the naming approach because it's all used within the View itself. I'm not sure about passing the model information to user_control_in_xaml, because this means that a designer would have to know to call this method if he is to redo the GUI -- I thought the idea was to hide model details from the View layer, but I'm not sure how else to do this.
You will also notice that the main GUI is passed the Model in the constructor, which I assume is equally bad. Perhaps I need to revisit the design to see if it's possible to have the ViewModel create the Model, which is what I usually do, but in this case I can't remember why I had to create it outside of the GUI.

Am new to MVVM myself but here's a possible solution:
Create a property in your VM that is of the object type (that controls the hardware) and bind it to an attached property on your UserControl. Then you could set the property in your VM using dependency injection, so it would be set when the VM is created. The way I see it, the class that talks to the hardware (hardware controller) is a service. The service can be injected to your view model and bound to your UserControl. Am not sure if this is the best way to do it and if it is strict enough to all the MVVM principles but it seems like a possible solution.

if your question is: How do i show my viewmodel in the view? then my solution is always using viewmodelfirst approach and datatemplates.
so all you have to do is wire up your viewmodel via binding to a contentcontrol.content in xaml. wpf + datatemplates will do the work and instantiate your usercontrol for your viewmodel.

You are right, the ViewModel shouldn't know about anything in the View - or even that there is such a thing as a View, hence why MVVM rocks for unit testing too as the VM couldn't care less if it is exposing itself to a View or a test framework.
As far as I can see you might have to refactor things a little if you can. To stick to the MVVM pattern you could expose an ICommand, the ICommand calls an internal VM method that goes and gets the data (or whatever) from the Model, this method then updates an ObservableCollection property of the data objects for the View to bind to. So for example, in your VM you could have
private ICommand _getDataCommand;
public ICommand GetDataCommand
{
get
{
if (this._getDataCommand == null)
{
this._getDataCommand = new RelayCommand(param => this.GetMyData(), param => true);
}
return this._getDataCommand;
}
}
private void GetMyData{
//go and get data from Model and add to the MyControls collection
}
private ObservableCollection<MyUserControls> _uc;
public ObservableCollection<MyUserControls> MyControls
{
get
{
if (this._uc == null)
{
this._uc = new ObservableCollection<MyUserControls>();
}
return this._uc;
}
}
For the RelayCommand check out Josh Smiths MSDN article.
In the View you could either call the ICommand in the static constructor of your UC - I am guessing youwould need to add an event in your class for this - or call the ICommand from some sort of click event on your UC - maybe just have a 'load' button on the WPF window. And set the databinding of your UC to be the exposed observable collection of the VM.
If you can't change your UC at all then you could derive a new class from it and override certain behaviour.
Hope that helps a bit at least, like I say, have a look at Josh Smiths MVVM article as he covers the binding and ICommand stuff in there brilliantly.

If you set the DataContext of the Window or UserControl containing thisUserControl to the main view model, the user control can call SetHardwareConnection() on itself in its Loaded event (or DataContextChanged event handler).
If that's not possible because you're saying the UserControl is 'fixed', you should derive from it or wrap it up in another UserControl, which would serve as a MVVM 'adapter'.
(In order to bind the window: you could make the MainViewModel a singleton with a static Instance property and use DataContext="{x:Static MyClass.Instance}". A nice way to get things going quickly)
Note; this is based on my understanding that MVVM works because of Bindings.. I always bind the control to a ViewModel, not pass a ViewModel as a parameter.
Hope that helps!