OK, here is the problem that I am having at the moment: I want to unify same array's elements with each other.
For example: I have an array with these elements "A", "B", "C", "D"
And I want to unify them (possibly then putting them in another List) so it would become:
A,B
A,C
A,D
B,C
B,D
C,D
So far, I have tried a simple for loop but with no success and couldn't think of how to approach this further.
Here is so far what I have tried with no success:
List<string> testList = new List<string>();
List<string> anotherList = new List<string>();
testList.AddRange(richTextBox1.Text.Split(','));
anotherList.ToArray();
for (int i = 0; i < testList.Count; i++) //no idea how to get the right count
{
var union = testList[i].Union(testList[i+1]);
foreach (char value in union)
{
richTextBox2.Text = value.ToString();
}
}
Thanks.
Perhaps this simple query helps:
var query = from s1 in testList
from s2 in testList.Skip(1)
where string.Compare(s1 , s2) < 0
select string.Format("{0},{1}", s1, s2);
testList = query.ToList();
this works fine for me to match your desired output
static List<string> list = new List<string> { "A", "B", "C", "D", "E" };
static List<string> finished = new List<string>();
public static void Main()
{
for (int i = 0; i < list.Count - 1; i++)
for (int j = i+1; j < list.Count; j++)
finished.Add(list[i]+","+list[j]);
}
This might be a good start to figure out the "right count"..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combination
Anyway...
You can do something like that (PseudoCode):
List<string> unions = new List<string>();
foreach(string s1 in list1)
{
foreach(string s2 in list2)
{
string union = s1+s2;
if(!unions.Contains(union))
unions.Add(union);
}
}
foreach(string union in unions)
Console.WriteLine(union);
You could also use some other approach using LINQ's Distinct
LINQ: Distinct values
Related
I want to find two longest words from array ,made from smaller words. my code are given below.
current out put is:
catxdogcatsrat, ratcatdogcat, catsdogcats, dogcatsdog
required output is:
ratcatdogcat, catsdogcats
class program
{
public static void Main(String[] args)
{
List<string> list2 = new List<string>();
string[] stringrray = { "cat", "cats", "catsdogcats", "catxdogcatsrat", "dog", "dogcatsdog",
"hippopotamuses", "rat", "ratcatdogcat" };
list2.Add(stringrray[0]);
list2.Add(stringrray[1]);
list2.Add(stringrray[2]);
list2.Add(stringrray[3]);
list2.Add(stringrray[4]);
list2.Add(stringrray[5]);
list2.Add(stringrray[6]);
list2.Add(stringrray[7]);
list2.Add(stringrray[8]);
List<string> list = new List<string>();
var mod = list2.OrderByDescending(x => x.Length).ToList();
int j = 1;
for (int k = 0; k < mod.Count; k++)
{
for (int i = 0; i < mod.Count-j; i++)
{
if (mod[i].Contains(mod[mod.Count - j]))
{
j++;
list.Add(mod[i]);
}
}
}
var mod1 = list.OrderByDescending(x => x.Length);
foreach (var i in mod1)
{
Console.WriteLine(i);
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
I think you are looking for something like this
string[] stringrray = { "cat", "cats", "catsdogcats", "catxdogcatsrat", "dog", "dogcatsdog", "hippopotamuses", "rat", "ratcatdogcat" };
List<string> list2 = new List<string>(stringrray);
List<string> Finallist = new List<string>();
char[] smallstrchar = String.Join("", list2.Where(x => x.Length <= 4)).ToCharArray();
char[] bigstrchar = String.Join("", list2.Where(x => x.Length > 4)).ToCharArray();
char[] modchar = bigstrchar.Except(smallstrchar).ToArray();
foreach(string bigstr in list2)
{
if(!(bigstr.IndexOfAny(modchar) != -1))
{
Finallist.Add(bigstr);
}
}
Finallist = Finallist.OrderByDescending(x => x.Length).Take(2).ToList();
foreach(string finalstr in Finallist)
{
Console.WriteLine(finalstr);
}
So first is the stringrray which contains all the strings which are supposed to be taken care and find the longest one out of it. With your code it also takes the string which contains x in them but all other chars are matched. So I have made a list of strings in list2 which contains all the values. Then splitted the list2 in 2 parts that is smallstrchar array contains all the chars of the smaller strings less than length of 4 and Bigstrchar contains all chars of strings which are bigger than length of 5. Now Except takes out all the chars which does not exsist in the smallstrchar and present in Bigstrchar. Now we have the list of chars which need to be excluded from the sort.
Finally IndexOfAny to find in that string contains that char or not. If not then add to Finallist. Later we can take 2 from the list.
Hope this helps
You could simplify adding the array to list2 with
list2.AddRange(stringrray)
You may use this code...
static void Main(string[] args)
{
List<string> words = new List<string>() { "cat", "cats", "catsdogcats", "catxdogcatsrat", "dog", "dogcatsdog", "hippopotamuses", "rat", "ratcatdogcat" };
List<string> result = new List<string>();
// solution 1
foreach (string word in words)
{
if (IsCombinationOf(word, words))
{
result.Add(word);
}
}
// solution 2
result = words.Where(x => IsCombinationOf(x, words)).ToList();
}
public static bool IsCombinationOf(string word, List<string> parts)
{
// removing the actual word just to be secure.
parts = parts.Where(x => x != word).OrderByDescending(x => x.Length).ToList();
// erase each part in word. Only those which are not in the list will remain.
foreach (string part in parts)
{
word = Regex.Replace(word, part, "");
}
// if there are any caracters left, it hasn't been a combination
return word.Length == 0;
}
but...
This code has a little bug. The OrderbyDescending clause ensures that cats will be removed before cat. Otherwise the s would remain and the code wouldn't work as expected. But if we use some fictional values this code will not work properly. For example:
List<string> words = new List<string>() { "abz", "e", "zefg", "f", "g", "abzefg" };
Let's have a look at abzef. The algorithm will remove zefg first, but then it's not possible to go any futher. Indeed, the word is a combination of abz, e, f and g .
I am looking to find the differences between two Lists of string arrays using the index 0 of the array as the primary key.
List<string[]> original = new List<string[]>();
List<string[]> web = new List<string[]>();
//define arrays for List 'original'
string[] original_a1 = new string[3]{"a","2","3"};
string[] original_a2 = new string[3]{"x","2","3"};
string[] original_a3 = new string[3]{"c","2","3"};
//define arrays for List 'web'
string[] web_a1 = new string[3]{"a","2","3"};
string[] web_a2 = new string[3]{"b","2","3"};
string[] web_a3 = new string[3]{"c","2","3"};
//populate Lists
original.Add(original_a1);
original.Add(original_a2);
original.Add(original_a3);
web.Add(web_a1);
web.Add(web_a2);
web.Add(web_a3);
My goal is to find what is in List 'original' but NOT in 'web' by using index 0 as the primary key
This is what I tried.
List<string> differences = new List<string>(); //differences go in here
string tempDiff = ""; // I use this to try and avoid duplicate entries but its not working
for(int i = 0; i < original.Count; i++){
for(int j = 0; j< web.Count; j++){
if(!(original[i][0].Equals(web[j][0]))){
tempDiff = original[i][0];
}
}
differences.Add(tempDiff);
}
OUTPUT:
foreach(string x in differences){
Console.WriteLine("SIZE " + differences.Count);
Console.WriteLine(x);
ConSole.ReadLine();
}
SIZE 3
SIZE 3
x
SIZE 3
x
Why is it reporting the mismatch 3 times instead of once?
Using linq you can just go:
var differences = orignal.Except(web).ToList();
Reference here
This will give you the values that are in original, that don't exist in web
Sorry didn't read your question properly, to answer your question:
You have a nested for-loop. So for each value of original (3) it will loop through all values of web (3), which is 9 loops total.
In 3 cases it doesn't match and therefore outputs 3 times.
I think this is what you want. I use Linq to grab the primary keys, and then I use Except to do original - web. By the way, you can use == instead of Equals with strings in C# because C# does a value comparison as opposed to a reference comparison.
List<string[]> original = new List<string[]>
{
new string[3] { "a", "2", "3" },
new string[3] { "x", "2", "3" },
new string[3] { "c", "2", "3" }
};
List<string[]> web = new List<string[]>
{
new string[3] { "a", "2", "3" },
new string[3] { "b", "2", "3" },
new string[3] { "c", "2", "3" }
};
var originalPrimaryKeys = original.Select(o => o[0]);
var webPrimaryKeys = web.Select(o => o[0]);
List<string> differences = originalPrimaryKeys.Except(webPrimaryKeys).ToList();
Console.WriteLine("The number of differences is {0}", differences.Count);
foreach (string diff in differences)
{
Console.WriteLine(diff);
}
And here it is without Linq:
var differences = new List<string>();
for (int i = 0; i < original.Count; i++)
{
bool found = false;
for (int j = 0; j < web.Count; j++)
{
if (original[i][0] == web[j][0])
{
found = true;
}
}
if (!found)
{
differences.Add(original[i][0]);
}
}
To answer your question: It is a nested for loop as stated in JanR's answer. This approach will make you reiterate to your web count 9 times, thus listing your mismatched key three times.
What could be a better way to do is this:
//Check for originals not introduced in web.
if(original.Count > web.Count)
{
for(int y = web.Count; y < original.Count; y++)
{
differences.Add(original[y][0]);
}
}
//Check if Web has value, if not, everything else is done on the first for loop
if(web.Count > 0)
{
for(int i = 0; i < original.Count; i++)
{
if(!original[i][0].Equals(web[i][0]))
differences.Add(original[i][0]);
}
}
Also, the output is in a for loop, when you just need one result, the length of the mismatch. You can do that without a loop.
Console.WriteLine("SIZE " + differences.Count);
This is, of course to make it kinda simpler if you're not used to using LINQ statements, but if you can do so with LINQ, then by all means, use LINQ as it's more efficient.
You can get the difference by using Except extension method like this:
var originalDic = original.ToDictionary(arr => arr.First());
var webDic = web.ToDictionary(arr => arr.First());
var differences =
originalDic
.Except(webDic, kvp => kvp.Key)
.Select(kvp => kvp.Value)
.ToList();
The trick here is to first convert your original and web lists into a Dictionary using the first element of each array as key and then perform Except.
I want to convert string[][] to List<List<string>>.
eg.
List<List<string>> listOfListReturned = new List<List<string>>();
string[][] twoDArrOfString = new string[2][];
I want to convert twoDArrOfString to listOfListReturned
Please suggest, how to do it?
Regards,
Vivek
Something like the following will also work:
string[][] twoDArrOfString = new string[2][];
var res = twoDArrOfString
.Where(inner => inner != null) // Cope with uninitialised inner arrays.
.Select(inner => inner.ToList()) // Project each inner array to a List<string>
.ToList(); // Materialise the IEnumerable<List<string>> to List<List<string>>
You need to handle nulls if the inner arrays have not been initialised.
If you aren't going to enumerate through all of these, you might want to drop the final ToList and simply work against the IEnumerable<List<string>> to avoid resolving all inner lists if you don't need to (taking advantage of the deferred execution of enumerables).
Any reason in particular why you are doing this?
List<List<string>> listOfListReturned = new List<List<string>>();
string[][] twoDArrOfString = new string[2][];
twoDArrOfString[0] = new[] {"a", "b"};
twoDArrOfString[1] = new[] {"c", "d"};
foreach (var s in twoDArrOfString)
{
listOfListReturned.Add(new List<string>(s));
}
Or
var result = twoDArrOfString.ToList();
var listOfList = result.Select(x => x.ToList()).ToList();
Not tested just imagine it :)
for (int i = 0; i < twoDArrOfString.Length; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < twoDArrOfString[i].Length; j++)
{
listOfListReturned[i].Add(twoDArrOfString[j].ToString());
}
listOfListReturned.Add(listOfListReturned[i]);
}
A more linq-ish version might be
List<List<string>> listOfListReturned = new List<List<string>>()
{
new List<string> {"A", "B"},
new List<string> {"C", "D"},
};
string[][] twoDArrOfString = new string[2][]
{
new [] {"A", "B"},
new []{"C", "D"},
};
var actual = twoDArrOfString.Select(arr => new List<string>(arr)).ToList();
for (var idx = 0; idx < listOfListReturned.Count; idx++) {
CollectionAssert.AreEqual(listOfListReturned[idx], actual[idx]);
}
EDIT: Adam's solution above allowing for empty rows is better.
int x = 9;
List<string> list = new List<string> {"a", "b"};
I want list to be: a b a b a ... until list.Count = x. How might I achieve this?
You could do it with LINQ easily:
List<string> result = (from ignored in Enumerable.Range(0, int.MaxValue)
from item in list
select item).Take(count).ToList();
Or without using a query expression:
List<string> result = Enumerable.Range(0, int.MaxValue)
.SelectMany(ignored => list)
.Take(count)
.ToList();
The use of Enumerable.Range here is just to force repetition - like Ani's approach of using Enumerable.Repeat, which will work too of course.
How about:
var result= Enumerable.Repeat(new[] { "a", "b" }, int.MaxValue)
.SelectMany(strArray => strArray)
.Take(x)
.ToList();
Something like this should work. I did not check it, let it be an exercise for you :)
int currentCount = list.Count;
for (int i=0; i<x; ++i)
{
list.Add(list[i%currentCount]);
}
int x = 9;
List<string> list = new List<string> {};
for (int i = 0; i < x; i++)
{
list.Add("a");
list.Add("b");
}
// verify
foreach (var item in list)
{
Console.WriteLine(item);
}
I'm looking to combine the contents of two string arrays, into a new list that has the contents of both joined together.
string[] days = { "Mon", "Tue", "Wed" };
string[] months = { "Jan", "Feb", "Mar" };
// I want the output to be a list with the contents
// "Mon Jan", "Mon Feb", "Mon Mar", "Tue Jan", "Tue Feb" etc...
How can I do it ? For when it's only two arrays, the following works and is easy enough:
List<string> CombineWords(string[] wordsOne, string[] wordsTwo)
{
var combinedWords = new List<string>();
foreach (var wordOne in wordsOne)
{
foreach (string wordTwo in wordsTwo)
{
combinedWords.Add(wordOne + " " + wordTwo);
}
}
return combinedWords;
}
But I'd like to be able to pass varying numbers of arrays in (i.e. to have a method with the signature below) and have it still work.
List<string> CombineWords(params string[][] arraysOfWords)
{
// what needs to go here ?
}
Or some other solution would be great. If it's possible to do this simply with Linq, even better!
What you want to do is actually a cartesian product of all the arrays of words, then join the words with spaces. Eric Lippert has a simple implementation of a Linq cartesian product here. You can use it to implement CombineWords:
List<string> CombineWords(params string[][] arraysOfWords)
{
return CartesianProduct(arraysOfWords)
.Select(x => string.Join(" ", x))
.ToList();
}
To cross join on any amount of arrays of strings:
// Define other methods and classes here
List<string> CombineWords(params string[][] arraysOfWords)
{
if (arraysOfWords.Length == 0)
return new List<string>();
IEnumerable<string> result = arraysOfWords[0];
foreach( string[] words in arraysOfWords.Skip(1) )
{
var tempWords = words;
result = from r in result
from w in tempWords
select string.Concat(r, " ", w);
}
return result.ToList();
}
Code below works for any number of arrays (and uses linq to some degree):
List<string> CombineWords(params string[][] wordsToCombine)
{
if (wordsToCombine.Length == 0)
return new List<string>();
IEnumerable<string> combinedWords = wordsToCombine[0].ToList();
for (int i = 1; i < wordsToCombine.Length; ++i)
{
var temp = i;
combinedWords = (from x in combinedWords from y in wordsToCombine[temp]
select x + " " + y);
}
return combinedWords.ToList();
}
public static List<string> CombineWords(params string[][] arraysOfWords)
{
var strings = new List<string>();
if (arraysOfWords.Length == 0)
{
return strings;
}
Action<string, int> combineWordsInternal = null;
combineWordsInternal = (baseString, index) =>
{
foreach (var str in arraysOfWords[index])
{
string str2 = baseString + " " + str;
if (index + 1 < arraysOfWords.Length)
{
combineWordsInternal(str2, index + 1);
}
else
{
strings.Add(str2);
}
}
};
combineWordsInternal(string.Empty, 0);
return strings;
}
Second try... I'm not able to do it in LINQ... A little too much complex to linquize correctly :-)
I'm using a local anonymous function (and showing that it's quite complex to recurse on anonymous functions, because you have to declare them separately)
This is a non-recursive solution which buffers strings as it progresses, to reduce the number of concatenations. Therefore it should also be usable for more arrays.
It also preserves your desired order - the items in the first array will always be at the beginning of the resulting string.
var s1 = new string[] { "A", "B", "C" };
var s2 = new string[] { "1", "2", "3", "4" };
var s3 = new string[] { "-", "!", "?" };
var res = Combine(s1, s2, s3);
And the function in question:
private List<string> Combine(params string[][] arrays)
{
if (arrays.Length == 1)
{
// The trivial case - exit.
return new List<string>(arrays[0]);
}
IEnumerable<string> last = arrays[arrays.Length - 1];
// Build from the last array, progress forward
for (int i = arrays.Length - 2; i >= 0; i--)
{
var buffer = new List<string>();
var current = arrays[i];
foreach (var head in current)
{
foreach (var tail in last)
{
// Concatenate with the desired space.
buffer.Add(head + " " + tail);
}
}
last = buffer;
}
return (List<string>)last;
}
Could you try this method ?
static List<string> CombineWords(string[] wordsOne, string[] wordsTwo)
{
var combinedWords = new List<string>();
for(int x = 0; (x <= wordsOne.Length - 1); ++x)
{
for(int y = 0; (x <= wordsTwo.Length - 1); ++y)
{
combinedWords.Add(string.Format("{0} {1}", wordsOne[x], wordsTwo[y]));
}
}
return combinedWords;
}
Kris