I'm dealing with software that frequently (almost exlusively) runs on computers boasting resolutions of over 5000x3000 pixels.
On such large displays, we needed a way to show the user where their mouse is. We looked in to making the actual cursor larger, but this seems to be impossible on Windows; instead, we've decided that on a certain keypress we would create a transparent form the size of the desktop, and on that we would draw a MouseCursor.png file that would refresh itself every 40-100ms.
However, on such a large canvas it does not work as responsively as we would like. Does anyone have any suggestions on how best to tackle such an issue?
The mouse cursor is displayed with a hardware feature, a video overlay. Very difficult to compete with that feature in software.
Control Panel + Mouse, Pointers tab. If the "extra large" variety isn't good enough and the "Display pointer trails" option on the Options tab isn't helpful either then you still have a Browse button to load your own .cur files.
Related
I'm working on a tinny software (C# and WPF) that does some filtering to the screen output. Examples on the filtering I'm talking about:
Customizable blue light filtering.
Increase/Decrease screen brightness (via changing the colors, not actual brightness)
Inverting screen colors.
And some more, but the simple idea is to tweak the pixel values of the screen after everything else is done rendering, but before showing the result.
Q1: How can I actually access (and then edit) the screen image/frame?
I've heard of getting and editing the screen DC directly (Win32) but I don't know if it's a good way, nor how to do it exactly.
Q2: what is the best way of applying these filters?
I think that tweaking every single pixel individually is a really bad way of doing it. (My code runs on the CPU and this process needs to be done every frame!)
Q3: Is there an event or hook for when windows is refreshing/updating the screen?
If yes, how can I register this process to it?
Note: I want a really performant way so that I don't lose any frame rate if possible.
Note: My preferred language for this is C#, C++ is ok.
Thanks a ton.
I am currently working in Windows Form Apps and am making what will essentially be a map editor for a game. The way i have gone about this is by having a central TabControl where each TabPage contains a custom PictureBox control and all the other UI controls are around this central TabControl. The PictureBox uses its Paint event to draw everything that is placed on the map, and therefore draws multiple images of many sizes, rotations and scales etc to the single PictureBox. This has all gone well so far. The TabPage is essentially used as a view window for the PictureBox and is of size (1280x720).
The problem is with the scale to which the maps are being produced. The avg (and also maximum) map size on screen is around 19200x10800px and can be made up of hundreds of items at any one point. When drawing just a backdrop image of size 19200x10800px the PictureBox starts to flicker when it redraws and makes the program unusable. As the map is so big you are able to pan around them and this is where the flickering really shows. Also i do not want to use a 19200x10800px image source if possible for the sake of file sizes and the scaled image quality isn't an issue at all.
I have done heaps of reading on why this might be and feel like I have tried everything up until this point. So far ive tried:
Having the background image only 1920x1080 and scaling it up by 10x
Starting with a 1920x1080 image, programatically resizing it and drawing this image
Slicing the background into multiple segments (i tried many different amounts) and drawing only the ones that the view window can see (tried this for both a small(1080p) and large(10800p) images)
Using graphics clipping so that only the things on screen would be drawn
Used Double Buffering on both the picturebox and the form that the picturebox is on
Converting the image at initialisation to an "optimised bitmap" with faster formatting and then drawing the bitmap
I've probably tried a couple other things along with minor optimisations but its taken me so long ive forgotten the rest. From what i've read its most likely something to do with the control redrawing too slowly for some sort of performance reason or a limitation with picturebox's, however exactly what is going on i cannot tell due to lack of experience with form apps controls.
Currently to draw the background in the Paint event i have either:
g.DrawImage(image, new Rectangle(0, 0, (int)(image.Size.Width * levelScale), (int)(image.Size.Height * levelScale)));
or
g.ScaleTransform(levelScale, levelScale);
g.DrawImage(image, new Rectangle(0, 0, (int)(image.Size.Width), (int)(image.Size.Height)));
Where g is the Graphics object.
Have I hit the limit of Win form apps capabilities or is there something i may be missing?
Any and all help appreciated,
Thanks in advance.
Just for formality I though id answer my own question just in case anyone else would like to know the outcome.
Based off the overwhelming consensus that winforms was just not made to do the things I was trying to do with it I decided I had to move to some other platform. Suggested to me was WPF, DirectX and OpenGL but after some extensive searching around I found what I think is the optimal solution.
In order to utilise the power of DirectX hardware acceleration MS has made it so that you can embed XNA graphics devices into a winforms application. Essentially you can create custom controls that run in the normal winform style that have access to a much higher caliber of graphics control. In this manner (with a bit of extra work) I have replaced the picturebox I was using with a custom graphics control which handles all of the drawing. This has worked very well, and on the up side i havent had to take too much of a hit to my development time.
For those looking for more info refer to this question which has further links that should help. Once again thanks to all those who gave their advice!
This is a quoted answer from the URL at the bottom. There are code examples at the link at the bottom. Hope this is helpful; not sure if you tried this yet and maybe it'll help you get a little more juice out of the existing picturebox control. As explain in the other answers, it sounds like you will be forced to a more powerful solution in the near future regardless (DirectX/OpenGL or WPF)
** Partial quote from http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/68ecd1f6-2eeb-45ce-a881-24c62145ab0e/c-picturebox-problems
"I'd guess the real problem is that it takes too long to redraw the images. GDI+ is pretty slow, it doesn't use any video hardware acceleration. To speed it up, be sure to avoid rescaling the drawing and to use the Format32PArgb format. It is about 10 times faster than any other format. Load the images into a Bitmap with the right format first."
If you have a LOT of items (Maybe realized as controls), forget about the standard event mechanism of Windows Forms. Some time ago, i've written a logic gate editor/simulator which supported lots of thousands of gates in the editor and was really fast. There, I've used the canvas and draw the gates as custom "images" instead of putting them as controls. You'll have to write a custom GetUnderlyingGate function which resolves the current gate / tile (Is your editor a tilemap editor?) from a coordinate array. Also, there were some visible area optimizations.
Maybe, when i'm back home, I'll upload some sourcecode and notify you.
I am standing between major decision in my WP7 application. It's majore purpose is to display images, always one at a time on fullscreen.
I need perfect support for pinch to zoom, moving image (while zoomed) and switching between images via flick gesture. Most of these things are already implemented in WebBrowser control, so I would just have to generate proper html source with path to image in Isolated storage.
Or should I use common Image control and implement these gestures on my own? I would like your advice before I make this decision.
Are you targeting Windows Phone 8 or 7?
Generally, I would implement my own.
Issues with using the web-browser:
1. Perf is going to be slower.
Memory footprint is going to be higher (though I doubt you really care about this - it's not going to be massive).
If you are going to favorite/download images, it will be harder (if at all possible) to navigate to them in the browser.
The background will always be white, unless you generate HTML each time that will control that bit.
The biggest issue is that the zooming in/out will be.. Janky... You won't be able to control how zoomed out the user can make it - meaning that they can zoom out enough to make the picture very small and it won't "snap back".
It's not a bad stop-gap, and the issues with it are not so big that one can say "no - don't do it", but they are enough that you should reconsider.
I have a C# application that has an existing WinForm that I now need to display upside down.
The application will be displayed on a touchscreen Windows 7 device. If two people are using the device, one person is viewing it right-side-up while another user will be simultaneously viewing it upside-down. I will need to have one control displayed right-side-up while another control is displayed upside-down, each duplicate forms. Both need to be functional. It is not necessary for the title bar and Windows close, maximize, and minimize to be rotated.
Is there a way to easily rotate this Form and all of its contents without having to rewrite it from scratch?
Unfortunately, rotating controls is not directly possible in WinForms.
At least, not if you want them to retain their functionality. It would be relatively simple to draw the control into a bitmap, rotate the bitmap, and then draw that back to the desired location on the form. But you would obviously lose the ability to interact with the controls. They would just be static representatives of their original selves.
But making functional upside-down controls just isn't going to happen. I mean, you could try to write a bunch of custom drawing code for owner-drawn controls, but you'll still run into a bunch of bugs, corner cases, and compatibility problems. The Win32 controls that WinForms is based on just don't support this. No big surprise, really, considering they were invented some 20–25 years before anyone thought of computer screens that you could carry around in your pocket and rotate in any direction. There is a good reason that UI technologies like WPF came out around the time that touch screens and tablets did.
There are some possibilities that can be explored when it comes to flipping the entire screen, but that's not going to help when you want different controls going different directions. (And I guess it betrays my vantage point as a desktop app guy when I say this, but that just sounds like an incredibly confusing UI.)
If you absolutely have to have this, someone else is going to have to give you another route to hack it, perhaps along the lines of Dhawalk's comment: hosting the WinForms control inside of a WPF app that does provide built-in support for rotated controls. I don't know enough about this to make any concrete suggestions down that path. From a few minutes of searching, it appears that WindowsFormsHost does not actually support rotation transforms, so this may be a non-starter anyway.
I'm developing a C# software that is able to show previews for files. Basically, there is a tree at the left that shows the disk filesystem entries, and a panel on the right that will show a preview of files selected in the tree, in a resizable panel that contains a docked PictureBox. Initially I only show preview for image files.
This software is designed for game developers, so I need to support all the image formats, I will use the great ImageMagick library for this purpose. The key is that some image files could be big, very big so, I have several questions, about performance and memory consumption.
Do I need to thread the load of the picture? Always, or only if the picture is very big?
Would be a correct if I load the picture directly in the Picturebox, or should I calculate a smaller size image (like a thumbnail or something similar), save it to disk, and then, show it?
Someone knows where can I download big picture files to test my preview with really very large files.
Imo always thread a work like this, there is little point in trying to decide what is big; for images that of are talking about I would of thought most would be enough that under the wrong conditions (computer is spending resources on other processes, not just yours) it could cause a perceivable pause in the UI thread.
Without knowing more, I would just test your implementation when it does the basic stuff and make a judgement call. There is also the question of required quality and desktop resolution of the user - so perhaps this should be configurable in some way.
Imo there could be no better place than PolyCount, specifically look in these forums:
http://www.polycount.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=42 &
http://www.polycount.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=60