Develop Reference

How do I use and ExpressionTree to access the name of the property in a lambda expression

I'm using the following approach to get the name of a property specified in a lambda by inspecting the resulting ExpressionTree:
var name =GetPropertyName<Entity1, Entity2>(x => x.Entity2);
public string GetPropertyName<T, P>(Expression<Func<T, P>> expression)
{
var memberExpression = expression.Body as MemberExpression;
var propertyInfo = memberExpression.Member as PropertyInfo;
return propertyInfo.Name;
}
//name is "Entity2"
Given the following expression i want to extract the names "Entity2s", "Entity3s" and "Entity4s"
var names = GetPropertyNames<Entity1, IEnumerable<Entity4>>(x => x.Entity2s.SelectMany(x => x.Entity3s).SelectMany(x => x.Entity4s));

With an ExpressionVisitor it is a simple as
public static List<string> GetPropertyNames<T, P>(Expression<Func<T, P>> expression)
{
var visitor = new Visitor();
visitor.Visit(expression);
return visitor.Names;
}
class Visitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
public Visitor()
{
Names = new List<string>();
}
public List<string> Names { get; }
protected override Expression VisitMember(MemberExpression node)
{
Names.Add(node.Member.Name);
return base.VisitMember(node);
}
}

Here is a method for extracting the member names from exactly the Expression tree you provided. A more generic method should probably be based on an ExpressionVisitor subclass.
public static List<string> GetPropertyNames<T, P>(Expression<Func<T, P>> fe) {
var ans = new List<string>();
var callExpr1 = fe.Body as MethodCallExpression;
var callExpr2 = callExpr1.Arguments[0] as MethodCallExpression;
var e2MemberExpr1 = callExpr2.Arguments[0] as MemberExpression;
ans.Add(e2MemberExpr1.Member.Name);
var e2MemberExpr2 = (callExpr2.Arguments[1] as LambdaExpression).Body as MemberExpression;
ans.Add(e2MemberExpr2.Member.Name);
var e1MemberExpr1 = (callExpr1.Arguments[1] as LambdaExpression).Body as MemberExpression;
ans.Add(e1MemberExpr1.Member.Name);
return ans;
}

Write extension method to retrieve property description using c#

I have following class
public class Device
{
[XmlElement("MobileDeviceType")]
public string DeviceType { get; set; }
}
I need extension method called "GetXElementName()" and I need to use the method like below.
string propertyDescription = (new Device()).DeviceType.GetXElementName(); // this shoud return "MobileDeviceType"
As a example
public static class ExtensionMethods
{
public static string GetXElementName<T>(this T source)
{
PropertyInfo prop = source.GetType().GetProperty(source.ToString());
string desc = prop.Name;
object[] attrs = prop.GetCustomAttributes(true);
object attr = attrs[0];
XmlElementAttribute descAttr = attr as XmlElementAttribute;
if (descAttr != null)
{
desc = descAttr.ElementName;
}
return desc;
}
}
Can I know how should I modify the method body to use the "GetXElementName()" method to use like I explained above.

You need to use Expressions to achieve that, because you need to know the member, not the value.
public static class Extensions
{
public static string GetXmlElementName<T, TProperty>(this T obj, Expression<Func<T, TProperty>> expression)
{
var memberExpression = expression.Body as MemberExpression;
if (memberExpression == null)
return string.Empty;
var xmlElementAttribute = memberExpression.Member.GetCustomAttribute<XmlElementAttribute>();
if (xmlElementAttribute == null)
return string.Empty;
return xmlElementAttribute.ElementName;
}
}
Usage:
public class MyClass
{
[XmlElement(ElementName = "Test")]
public string MyProperty { get; set; }
}
new MyClass().GetXmlElementName(x => x.MyProperty) // output "Test"
EDIT: another version, without an object instance (see Nyerguds comment)
I guess the most elegant way is make a generic class, with a generic method, so you can call it by specify only the T type parameter (TProperty is taken implicitly).
public class GetXmlElementName<T>
{
public static string From<TProperty>(Expression<Func<T, TProperty>> expression)
{
var memberExpression = expression.Body as MemberExpression;
if (memberExpression == null)
return string.Empty;
var xmlElementAttribute = memberExpression.Member.GetCustomAttribute<XmlElementAttribute>();
if (xmlElementAttribute == null)
return string.Empty;
return xmlElementAttribute.ElementName;
}
}
Usage:
GetXmlElementName<MyClass>.From(x => x.MyProperty) // output "Test"

Reading lambda expression [duplicate]

Is there a better way to get the Property name when passed in via a lambda expression?
Here is what i currently have.
eg.
GetSortingInfo<User>(u => u.UserId);
It worked by casting it as a memberexpression only when the property was a string. because not all properties are strings i had to use object but then it would return a unaryexpression for those.
public static RouteValueDictionary GetInfo<T>(this HtmlHelper html,
Expression<Func<T, object>> action) where T : class
{
var expression = GetMemberInfo(action);
string name = expression.Member.Name;
return GetInfo(html, name);
}
private static MemberExpression GetMemberInfo(Expression method)
{
LambdaExpression lambda = method as LambdaExpression;
if (lambda == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("method");
MemberExpression memberExpr = null;
if (lambda.Body.NodeType == ExpressionType.Convert)
{
memberExpr =
((UnaryExpression)lambda.Body).Operand as MemberExpression;
}
else if (lambda.Body.NodeType == ExpressionType.MemberAccess)
{
memberExpr = lambda.Body as MemberExpression;
}
if (memberExpr == null)
throw new ArgumentException("method");
return memberExpr;
}

I recently did a very similar thing to make a type safe OnPropertyChanged method.
Here's a method that'll return the PropertyInfo object for the expression. It throws an exception if the expression is not a property.
public PropertyInfo GetPropertyInfo<TSource, TProperty>(
TSource source,
Expression<Func<TSource, TProperty>> propertyLambda)
{
Type type = typeof(TSource);
MemberExpression member = propertyLambda.Body as MemberExpression;
if (member == null)
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format(
"Expression '{0}' refers to a method, not a property.",
propertyLambda.ToString()));
PropertyInfo propInfo = member.Member as PropertyInfo;
if (propInfo == null)
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format(
"Expression '{0}' refers to a field, not a property.",
propertyLambda.ToString()));
if (type != propInfo.ReflectedType &&
!type.IsSubclassOf(propInfo.ReflectedType))
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format(
"Expression '{0}' refers to a property that is not from type {1}.",
propertyLambda.ToString(),
type));
return propInfo;
}
The source parameter is used so the compiler can do type inference on the method call. You can do the following
var propertyInfo = GetPropertyInfo(someUserObject, u => u.UserID);

I found another way you can do it was to have the source and property strongly typed and explicitly infer the input for the lambda. Not sure if that is correct terminology but here is the result.
public static RouteValueDictionary GetInfo<T,P>(this HtmlHelper html, Expression<Func<T, P>> action) where T : class
{
var expression = (MemberExpression)action.Body;
string name = expression.Member.Name;
return GetInfo(html, name);
}
And then call it like so.
GetInfo((User u) => u.UserId);
and voila it works.

I was playing around with the same thing and worked this up. It's not fully tested but seems to handle the issue with value types (the unaryexpression issue you ran into)
public static string GetName(Expression<Func<object>> exp)
{
MemberExpression body = exp.Body as MemberExpression;
if (body == null) {
UnaryExpression ubody = (UnaryExpression)exp.Body;
body = ubody.Operand as MemberExpression;
}
return body.Member.Name;
}

public string GetName<TSource, TField>(Expression<Func<TSource, TField>> Field)
{
return (Field.Body as MemberExpression ?? ((UnaryExpression)Field.Body).Operand as MemberExpression).Member.Name;
}
This handles member and unary expressions. The difference being that you will get a UnaryExpression if your expression represents a value type whereas you will get a MemberExpression if your expression represents a reference type. Everything can be cast to an object, but value types must be boxed. This is why the UnaryExpression exists. Reference.
For the sakes of readability (#Jowen), here's an expanded equivalent:
public string GetName<TSource, TField>(Expression<Func<TSource, TField>> Field)
{
if (object.Equals(Field, null))
{
throw new NullReferenceException("Field is required");
}
MemberExpression expr = null;
if (Field.Body is MemberExpression)
{
expr = (MemberExpression)Field.Body;
}
else if (Field.Body is UnaryExpression)
{
expr = (MemberExpression)((UnaryExpression)Field.Body).Operand;
}
else
{
const string Format = "Expression '{0}' not supported.";
string message = string.Format(Format, Field);
throw new ArgumentException(message, "Field");
}
return expr.Member.Name;
}

With C# 7 pattern matching:
public static string GetMemberName<T>(this Expression<T> expression)
{
switch (expression.Body)
{
case MemberExpression m:
return m.Member.Name;
case UnaryExpression u when u.Operand is MemberExpression m:
return m.Member.Name;
default:
throw new NotImplementedException(expression.GetType().ToString());
}
}
Example:
public static RouteValueDictionary GetInfo<T>(this HtmlHelper html,
Expression<Func<T, object>> action) where T : class
{
var name = action.GetMemberName();
return GetInfo(html, name);
}
[Update] C# 8 pattern matching:
public static string GetMemberName<T>(this Expression<T> expression) => expression.Body switch
{
MemberExpression m => m.Member.Name,
UnaryExpression u when u.Operand is MemberExpression m => m.Member.Name,
_ => throw new NotImplementedException(expression.GetType().ToString())
};

now in C# 6 you can simply use nameof like this nameof(User.UserId)
which has many benefits, among them is that this is done at compile time, not runtime.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/dn802602.aspx

This is a general implementation to get the string name of fields/properties/indexers/methods/extension methods/delegates of struct/class/interface/delegate/array. I have tested with combinations of static/instance and non-generic/generic variants.
//involves recursion
public static string GetMemberName(this LambdaExpression memberSelector)
{
Func<Expression, string> nameSelector = null; //recursive func
nameSelector = e => //or move the entire thing to a separate recursive method
{
switch (e.NodeType)
{
case ExpressionType.Parameter:
return ((ParameterExpression)e).Name;
case ExpressionType.MemberAccess:
return ((MemberExpression)e).Member.Name;
case ExpressionType.Call:
return ((MethodCallExpression)e).Method.Name;
case ExpressionType.Convert:
case ExpressionType.ConvertChecked:
return nameSelector(((UnaryExpression)e).Operand);
case ExpressionType.Invoke:
return nameSelector(((InvocationExpression)e).Expression);
case ExpressionType.ArrayLength:
return "Length";
default:
throw new Exception("not a proper member selector");
}
};
return nameSelector(memberSelector.Body);
}
This thing can be written in a simple while loop too:
//iteration based
public static string GetMemberName(this LambdaExpression memberSelector)
{
var currentExpression = memberSelector.Body;
while (true)
{
switch (currentExpression.NodeType)
{
case ExpressionType.Parameter:
return ((ParameterExpression)currentExpression).Name;
case ExpressionType.MemberAccess:
return ((MemberExpression)currentExpression).Member.Name;
case ExpressionType.Call:
return ((MethodCallExpression)currentExpression).Method.Name;
case ExpressionType.Convert:
case ExpressionType.ConvertChecked:
currentExpression = ((UnaryExpression)currentExpression).Operand;
break;
case ExpressionType.Invoke:
currentExpression = ((InvocationExpression)currentExpression).Expression;
break;
case ExpressionType.ArrayLength:
return "Length";
default:
throw new Exception("not a proper member selector");
}
}
}
I like the recursive approach, though the second one might be easier to read. One can call it like:
someExpr = x => x.Property.ExtensionMethod()[0]; //or
someExpr = x => Static.Method().Field; //or
someExpr = x => VoidMethod(); //or
someExpr = () => localVariable; //or
someExpr = x => x; //or
someExpr = x => (Type)x; //or
someExpr = () => Array[0].Delegate(null); //etc
string name = someExpr.GetMemberName();
to print the last member.
Note:
In case of chained expressions like A.B.C, "C" is returned.
This doesn't work with consts, array indexers or enums (impossible to cover all cases).

There's an edge case when it comes to Array.Length. While 'Length' is exposed as a property, you can't use it in any of the previously proposed solutions.
using Contract = System.Diagnostics.Contracts.Contract;
using Exprs = System.Linq.Expressions;
static string PropertyNameFromMemberExpr(Exprs.MemberExpression expr)
{
return expr.Member.Name;
}
static string PropertyNameFromUnaryExpr(Exprs.UnaryExpression expr)
{
if (expr.NodeType == Exprs.ExpressionType.ArrayLength)
return "Length";
var mem_expr = expr.Operand as Exprs.MemberExpression;
return PropertyNameFromMemberExpr(mem_expr);
}
static string PropertyNameFromLambdaExpr(Exprs.LambdaExpression expr)
{
if (expr.Body is Exprs.MemberExpression) return PropertyNameFromMemberExpr(expr.Body as Exprs.MemberExpression);
else if (expr.Body is Exprs.UnaryExpression) return PropertyNameFromUnaryExpr(expr.Body as Exprs.UnaryExpression);
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
public static string PropertyNameFromExpr<TProp>(Exprs.Expression<Func<TProp>> expr)
{
Contract.Requires<ArgumentNullException>(expr != null);
Contract.Requires<ArgumentException>(expr.Body is Exprs.MemberExpression || expr.Body is Exprs.UnaryExpression);
return PropertyNameFromLambdaExpr(expr);
}
public static string PropertyNameFromExpr<T, TProp>(Exprs.Expression<Func<T, TProp>> expr)
{
Contract.Requires<ArgumentNullException>(expr != null);
Contract.Requires<ArgumentException>(expr.Body is Exprs.MemberExpression || expr.Body is Exprs.UnaryExpression);
return PropertyNameFromLambdaExpr(expr);
}
Now example usage:
int[] someArray = new int[1];
Console.WriteLine(PropertyNameFromExpr( () => someArray.Length ));
If PropertyNameFromUnaryExpr didn't check for ArrayLength, "someArray" would be printed to the console (compiler seems to generate direct access to the backing Length field, as an optimization, even in Debug, thus the special case).

Here's an update to method proposed by Cameron. The first parameter is not required.
public PropertyInfo GetPropertyInfo<TSource, TProperty>(
Expression<Func<TSource, TProperty>> propertyLambda)
{
Type type = typeof(TSource);
MemberExpression member = propertyLambda.Body as MemberExpression;
if (member == null)
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format(
"Expression '{0}' refers to a method, not a property.",
propertyLambda.ToString()));
PropertyInfo propInfo = member.Member as PropertyInfo;
if (propInfo == null)
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format(
"Expression '{0}' refers to a field, not a property.",
propertyLambda.ToString()));
if (type != propInfo.ReflectedType &&
!type.IsSubclassOf(propInfo.ReflectedType))
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format(
"Expresion '{0}' refers to a property that is not from type {1}.",
propertyLambda.ToString(),
type));
return propInfo;
}
You can do the following:
var propertyInfo = GetPropertyInfo<SomeType>(u => u.UserID);
var propertyInfo = GetPropertyInfo((SomeType u) => u.UserID);
Extension methods:
public static PropertyInfo GetPropertyInfo<TSource, TProperty>(this TSource source,
Expression<Func<TSource, TProperty>> propertyLambda) where TSource : class
{
return GetPropertyInfo(propertyLambda);
}
public static string NameOfProperty<TSource, TProperty>(this TSource source,
Expression<Func<TSource, TProperty>> propertyLambda) where TSource : class
{
PropertyInfo prodInfo = GetPropertyInfo(propertyLambda);
return prodInfo.Name;
}
You can:
SomeType someInstance = null;
string propName = someInstance.NameOfProperty(i => i.Length);
PropertyInfo propInfo = someInstance.GetPropertyInfo(i => i.Length);

I've found that some of the suggested answers which drill down into the MemberExpression/UnaryExpression don't capture nested/subproperties.
ex) o => o.Thing1.Thing2 returns Thing1 rather than Thing1.Thing2.
This distinction is important if you're trying to work with EntityFramework DbSet.Include(...).
I've found that just parsing the Expression.ToString() seems to work fine, and comparatively quickly. I compared it against the UnaryExpression version, and even getting ToString off of the Member/UnaryExpression to see if that was faster, but the difference was negligible. Please correct me if this is a terrible idea.
The Extension Method
/// <summary>
/// Given an expression, extract the listed property name; similar to reflection but with familiar LINQ+lambdas. Technique #via https://stackoverflow.com/a/16647343/1037948
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>Cheats and uses the tostring output -- Should consult performance differences</remarks>
/// <typeparam name="TModel">the model type to extract property names</typeparam>
/// <typeparam name="TValue">the value type of the expected property</typeparam>
/// <param name="propertySelector">expression that just selects a model property to be turned into a string</param>
/// <param name="delimiter">Expression toString delimiter to split from lambda param</param>
/// <param name="endTrim">Sometimes the Expression toString contains a method call, something like "Convert(x)", so we need to strip the closing part from the end</param>
/// <returns>indicated property name</returns>
public static string GetPropertyName<TModel, TValue>(this Expression<Func<TModel, TValue>> propertySelector, char delimiter = '.', char endTrim = ')') {
var asString = propertySelector.ToString(); // gives you: "o => o.Whatever"
var firstDelim = asString.IndexOf(delimiter); // make sure there is a beginning property indicator; the "." in "o.Whatever" -- this may not be necessary?
return firstDelim < 0
? asString
: asString.Substring(firstDelim+1).TrimEnd(endTrim);
}//-- fn GetPropertyNameExtended
(Checking for the delimiter might even be overkill)
Demo (LinqPad)
Demonstration + Comparison code -- https://gist.github.com/zaus/6992590

I"m using an extension method for pre C# 6 projects and the nameof() for those targeting C# 6.
public static class MiscExtentions
{
public static string NameOf<TModel, TProperty>(this object #object, Expression<Func<TModel, TProperty>> propertyExpression)
{
var expression = propertyExpression.Body as MemberExpression;
if (expression == null)
{
throw new ArgumentException("Expression is not a property.");
}
return expression.Member.Name;
}
}
And i call it like:
public class MyClass
{
public int Property1 { get; set; }
public string Property2 { get; set; }
public int[] Property3 { get; set; }
public Subclass Property4 { get; set; }
public Subclass[] Property5 { get; set; }
}
public class Subclass
{
public int PropertyA { get; set; }
public string PropertyB { get; set; }
}
// result is Property1
this.NameOf((MyClass o) => o.Property1);
// result is Property2
this.NameOf((MyClass o) => o.Property2);
// result is Property3
this.NameOf((MyClass o) => o.Property3);
// result is Property4
this.NameOf((MyClass o) => o.Property4);
// result is PropertyB
this.NameOf((MyClass o) => o.Property4.PropertyB);
// result is Property5
this.NameOf((MyClass o) => o.Property5);
It works fine with both fields and properties.

Well, there's no need to call .Name.ToString(), but broadly that is about it, yes. The only consideration you might need is whether x.Foo.Bar should return "Foo", "Bar", or an exception - i.e. do you need to iterate at all.
(re comment) for more on flexible sorting, see here.

This might be optimal
public static string GetPropertyName<TResult>(Expression<Func<TResult>> expr)
{
var memberAccess = expr.Body as MemberExpression;
var propertyInfo = memberAccess?.Member as PropertyInfo;
var propertyName = propertyInfo?.Name;
return propertyName;
}

I leave this function if you want to get multiples fields:
/// <summary>
/// Get properties separated by , (Ex: to invoke 'd => new { d.FirstName, d.LastName }')
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
/// <param name="exp"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static string GetFields<T>(Expression<Func<T, object>> exp)
{
MemberExpression body = exp.Body as MemberExpression;
var fields = new List<string>();
if (body == null)
{
NewExpression ubody = exp.Body as NewExpression;
if (ubody != null)
foreach (var arg in ubody.Arguments)
{
fields.Add((arg as MemberExpression).Member.Name);
}
}
return string.Join(",", fields);
}

I created an extension method on ObjectStateEntry to be able to flag properties (of Entity Framework POCO classes) as modified in a type safe manner, since the default method only accepts a string. Here's my way of getting the name from the property:
public static void SetModifiedProperty<T>(this System.Data.Objects.ObjectStateEntry state, Expression<Func<T>> action)
{
var body = (MemberExpression)action.Body;
string propertyName = body.Member.Name;
state.SetModifiedProperty(propertyName);
}

I have done the INotifyPropertyChanged implementation similar to the method below. Here the properties are stored in a dictionary in the base class shown below. It is of course not always desirable to use inheritance, but for view models I think it is acceptable and gives very clean property references in the view model classes.
public class PhotoDetailsViewModel
: PropertyChangedNotifierBase<PhotoDetailsViewModel>
{
public bool IsLoading
{
get { return GetValue(x => x.IsLoading); }
set { SetPropertyValue(x => x.IsLoading, value); }
}
public string PendingOperation
{
get { return GetValue(x => x.PendingOperation); }
set { SetPropertyValue(x => x.PendingOperation, value); }
}
public PhotoViewModel Photo
{
get { return GetValue(x => x.Photo); }
set { SetPropertyValue(x => x.Photo, value); }
}
}
The somewhat more complex base class is shown below. It handles the translation from lambda expression to property name. Note that the properties are really pseudo properties since only the names are used. But it will appear transparent to the view model and references to the properties on the view model.
public class PropertyChangedNotifierBase<T> : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
readonly Dictionary<string, object> _properties = new Dictionary<string, object>();
protected U GetValue<U>(Expression<Func<T, U>> property)
{
var propertyName = GetPropertyName(property);
return GetValue<U>(propertyName);
}
private U GetValue<U>(string propertyName)
{
object value;
if (!_properties.TryGetValue(propertyName, out value))
{
return default(U);
}
return (U)value;
}
protected void SetPropertyValue<U>(Expression<Func<T, U>> property, U value)
{
var propertyName = GetPropertyName(property);
var oldValue = GetValue<U>(propertyName);
if (Object.ReferenceEquals(oldValue, value))
{
return;
}
_properties[propertyName] = value;
RaisePropertyChangedEvent(propertyName);
}
protected void RaisePropertyChangedEvent<U>(Expression<Func<T, U>> property)
{
var name = GetPropertyName(property);
RaisePropertyChangedEvent(name);
}
protected void RaisePropertyChangedEvent(string propertyName)
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
{
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
private static string GetPropertyName<U>(Expression<Func<T, U>> property)
{
if (property == null)
{
throw new NullReferenceException("property");
}
var lambda = property as LambdaExpression;
var memberAssignment = (MemberExpression) lambda.Body;
return memberAssignment.Member.Name;
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
}

This is another answer:
public static string GetPropertyName<TModel, TProperty>(this HtmlHelper<TModel> htmlHelper,
Expression<Func<TModel, TProperty>> expression)
{
var metaData = ModelMetadata.FromLambdaExpression(expression, htmlHelper.ViewData);
return metaData.PropertyName;
}

Here is another way to get the PropertyInfo based off this answer. It eliminates the need for an object instance.
/// <summary>
/// Get metadata of property referenced by expression. Type constrained.
/// </summary>
public static PropertyInfo GetPropertyInfo<TSource, TProperty>(Expression<Func<TSource, TProperty>> propertyLambda)
{
return GetPropertyInfo((LambdaExpression) propertyLambda);
}
/// <summary>
/// Get metadata of property referenced by expression.
/// </summary>
public static PropertyInfo GetPropertyInfo(LambdaExpression propertyLambda)
{
// https://stackoverflow.com/questions/671968/retrieving-property-name-from-lambda-expression
MemberExpression member = propertyLambda.Body as MemberExpression;
if (member == null)
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format(
"Expression '{0}' refers to a method, not a property.",
propertyLambda.ToString()));
PropertyInfo propInfo = member.Member as PropertyInfo;
if (propInfo == null)
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format(
"Expression '{0}' refers to a field, not a property.",
propertyLambda.ToString()));
if(propertyLambda.Parameters.Count() == 0)
throw new ArgumentException(String.Format(
"Expression '{0}' does not have any parameters. A property expression needs to have at least 1 parameter.",
propertyLambda.ToString()));
var type = propertyLambda.Parameters[0].Type;
if (type != propInfo.ReflectedType &&
!type.IsSubclassOf(propInfo.ReflectedType))
throw new ArgumentException(String.Format(
"Expression '{0}' refers to a property that is not from type {1}.",
propertyLambda.ToString(),
type));
return propInfo;
}
It can be called like so:
var propertyInfo = GetPropertyInfo((User u) => u.UserID);

GetPropetyAccess() is available if you can refer efcore.
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Infrastructure;
var propertyInfo = lambda.GetPropetyAccess(); //PropertyInfo
var propertyName = propertyInfo.Name;

I've updated #Cameron's answer to include some safety checks against Convert typed lambda expressions:
PropertyInfo GetPropertyName<TSource, TProperty>(
Expression<Func<TSource, TProperty>> propertyLambda)
{
var body = propertyLambda.Body;
if (!(body is MemberExpression member)
&& !(body is UnaryExpression unary
&& (member = unary.Operand as MemberExpression) != null))
throw new ArgumentException($"Expression '{propertyLambda}' " +
"does not refer to a property.");
if (!(member.Member is PropertyInfo propInfo))
throw new ArgumentException($"Expression '{propertyLambda}' " +
"refers to a field, not a property.");
var type = typeof(TSource);
if (!propInfo.DeclaringType.GetTypeInfo().IsAssignableFrom(type.GetTypeInfo()))
throw new ArgumentException($"Expresion '{propertyLambda}' " +
"refers to a property that is not from type '{type}'.");
return propInfo;
}

Starting with .NET 4.0 you can use ExpressionVisitor to find properties:
class ExprVisitor : ExpressionVisitor {
public bool IsFound { get; private set; }
public string MemberName { get; private set; }
public Type MemberType { get; private set; }
protected override Expression VisitMember(MemberExpression node) {
if (!IsFound && node.Member.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property) {
IsFound = true;
MemberName = node.Member.Name;
MemberType = node.Type;
}
return base.VisitMember(node);
}
}
Here is how you use this visitor:
var visitor = new ExprVisitor();
visitor.Visit(expr);
if (visitor.IsFound) {
Console.WriteLine("First property in the expression tree: Name={0}, Type={1}", visitor.MemberName, visitor.MemberType.FullName);
} else {
Console.WriteLine("No properties found.");
}

static void Main(string[] args)
{
var prop = GetPropertyInfo<MyDto>(_ => _.MyProperty);
MyDto dto = new MyDto();
dto.MyProperty = 666;
var value = prop.GetValue(dto);
// value == 666
}
class MyDto
{
public int MyProperty { get; set; }
}
public static PropertyInfo GetPropertyInfo<TSource>(Expression<Func<TSource, object>> propertyLambda)
{
Type type = typeof(TSource);
var member = propertyLambda.Body as MemberExpression;
if (member == null)
{
var unary = propertyLambda.Body as UnaryExpression;
if (unary != null)
{
member = unary.Operand as MemberExpression;
}
}
if (member == null)
{
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format("Expression '{0}' refers to a method, not a property.",
propertyLambda.ToString()));
}
var propInfo = member.Member as PropertyInfo;
if (propInfo == null)
{
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format("Expression '{0}' refers to a field, not a property.",
propertyLambda.ToString()));
}
if (type != propInfo.ReflectedType && !type.IsSubclassOf(propInfo.ReflectedType))
{
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format("Expression '{0}' refers to a property that is not from type {1}.",
propertyLambda.ToString(), type));
}
return propInfo;
}

Assuming (TModel as class)
Expression<Func<TModel, TValue>> expression
retrieve the property's name with
expression.GetPropertyInfo().Name;
The extension function:
public static PropertyInfo GetPropertyInfo<TType, TReturn>(this Expression<Func<TType, TReturn>> property)
{
LambdaExpression lambda = property;
var memberExpression = lambda.Body is UnaryExpression expression
? (MemberExpression)expression.Operand
: (MemberExpression)lambda.Body;
return (PropertyInfo)memberExpression.Member;
}

Passing property list as strongly typed parameters

I have this method which extracts the property name from an expresssion:
private static string GetPropertyName<TObj, TProp>(Expression<Func<TObj, TProp>> prop)
{
var expression = prop.Body as MemberExpression;
if (expression != null)
{
var property = expression.Member as PropertyInfo;
if (property != null)
{
return property.Name;
}
}
return string.Empty;
}
So later I can use it like this:
GetPropertyName((User u) => u.Surname); //Returns "Surname"
I would like to be able to pass a collection of properties instead one by one. Just to be clear, the properties could be of different types.

I am completely agree with #Patrick and its preferred way over mine.
but if you say you are not using the C#6.0 and then you can use the code you have written. I just use the param, yield return and one foreach loop
private static IEnumerable<string> GetPropertyName<TObj, TProp>(params Expression<Func<TObj, TProp>>[] propCollection)
{
foreach (var prop in propCollection)
{
var expression = prop.Body as MemberExpression;
if (expression != null)
{
var property = expression.Member as PropertyInfo;
if (property != null)
{
yield return property.Name;
}
}
yield return string.Empty;
}
}
UPDATE
First One ask you to specific the type of the object again and again mean you have to provide the full length expression again.
Try the below it will ask you to specify the property as much as you want in one Expression only.
public static IEnumerable<string> GetPropertiesName<TObj, TProp>(Expression<Func<TObj, TProp[]>> prop)
{
var array = (prop.Body as NewArrayExpression);
var exp = array == null ? null : array.Expressions;
if (exp != null)
{
//var expArr = (prop.Body as NewArrayExpression).Expressions;
foreach (var oneProp in exp)
{
Expression onePropExp;
if (oneProp.GetType() == typeof (UnaryExpression))
{
onePropExp = (oneProp as UnaryExpression).Operand;
}
else
{
onePropExp = oneProp;
}
var property = (onePropExp as MemberExpression).Member as PropertyInfo;
if (property != null)
{
yield return property.Name;
}
yield return string.Empty;
}
}
yield return string.Empty;
}
You can call it like -
var propNames = GetPropertiesName((AllSubsTransAndDevices d) => new[]
{
d.CurrentDriverId,
d.GPSDevicesId,
d.TransporterId
});

It might be me, but I think you don't need to do this the hard way. You can simply use the C# 6 nameof keyword. This assumes you can use C# 6 of course.
string name = nameof(u.Surname);

Try this:
Usage: string[] props = GetPropertiesName((MainWindow m) => m.Lalala, (MainWindow m) => m.Lalala);
private static string[] GetPropertiesName<TObj, TProp>(params Expression<Func<TObj, TProp>>[] prop)
{
List<string> ret = new List<string>();
foreach (var item in prop)
ret.Add(GetPropertyName(item));
return ret.ToArray();
}
private static string GetPropertyName<TObj, TProp>(Expression<Func<TObj, TProp>> prop)
{
var expression = prop.Body as MemberExpression;
if (expression != null)
{
var property = expression.Member as PropertyInfo;
if (property != null)
{
return property.Name;
}
}
return string.Empty;
}

Building a method using lambda expressions call

I'm building a method to get the DisplayAttribute from System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations to show on a label for the property.
[Display(Name="First Name")]
public string FirstName { get; set; }
The method is working well:
string GetDisplay(Type dataType, string property)
{
PropertyInfo propInfo = dataType.GetProperty(property);
DisplayAttribute attr = propInfo.GetCustomAttributes(false).OfType<DisplayAttribute>().FirstOrDefault();
return (attr == null) ? propInfo.Name : attr.Name;
}
The call of method can be:
lblNome.Text = GetDisplay(typeof(Person), "FirstName") + ":";
I can use a more elegant sintax using Generics, like:
string GetDisplay<T>(string property)
{
PropertyInfo propInfo = typeof(T).GetProperty(property);
DisplayAttribute attr = propInfo.GetCustomAttributes(false).OfType<DisplayAttribute>().FirstOrDefault();
return (attr == null) ? propInfo.Name : attr.Name;
}
And the call:
GetDisplay<Person>("FirstName");
So, I would like to make it more more elegant using lambda expressions turning the call like this:
GetDisplay<Person>(p => p.FirstName);
The question is how can I achieve this?

Here is the method I use to fetch property name given by lambda expression:
public static string PropertyName<T1, T2>(this Expression<Func<T1, T2>> expression)
{
MemberExpression member = null;
if (expression.Body is MemberExpression)
member = expression.Body as MemberExpression;
if (expression.Body is UnaryExpression && expression.Body.NodeType == ExpressionType.Convert)
member = ((UnaryExpression)expression.Body).Operand as MemberExpression;
if (member == null)
throw new ArgumentException("Selector must point to a property or field.", "expression");
return member.Member.Name;
}
Using this method you can just call the previous method:
string GetDisplay<T>(Expression<Func<T, object>> expression)
{
return GetDisplay<T>(expression.PropertyName());
}