I have a Cache to store the most two recent images every time the user clicks the next image, Does the "RemoveAt(x)" dispose the x image, or what I want is for the removed image not to be in memory. to be totally removed.
List<Image> BackimageList = new List<Image>();
private void BackimageListCache(Image img)
{
BackimageList.Add(img);
if (BackimageList.Count > 2)
{
BackimageList.RemoveAt(0); //oldest image has index 0
}
}
Collections in .NET do not "own" an object. So they cannot assume that the object isn't used anywhere else, they can thus not dispose the object. Ownership rules are entirely your own to implement. Which does imply that you also have to be sure the the image isn't, say, displayed in a PictureBox.
Ensuring the image doesn't occupy any memory anymore is iffy as well. You cannot manage memory yourself, it is the job of the garbage collector. However, Image uses a rather substantial amount of unmanaged memory to store the pixel data, that memory does get released when you call Dispose(). The managed part of Image stays in memory until the GC gets to it. It is small.
The RemoveAt method does not call Dispose on the image. You will have to dispose it yourself before you call RemoveAt.
Edit
If the type implements IDisposable, then to dispose it you write
BackImageList[0].Dispose();
BackImageList.RemoveAt(0);
RemoveAt(0) does, essentially:
for (int i = 1; i < BackImageList.Count; ++i)
{
BackImageList[i-1] = BackImageList[i];
}
BackImageList.Count--;
That's all done internally, of course. You can't set the Count property. It's done by the RemoveAt method.
There is no need to set the value to null before calling RemoveAt.
Related
In my program I add millions of records in a List in a loop, so as the program continues my RAM seems to grow too (I suspect because new and new elements are added to the list) - so if a timer tick event or just button push results in list.Clear(): will this immediately release my RAM? The ram seems to grow a lot to 500mb+ so with limited free amount on amazon instances this is an issue...thanx!
List have Clear() or Remove() methods to clear or Remove the Items within the List.
Force the Objects within the List which are not in use, to be cleared. Or Can assign null values to those Objects which are not in use, so that the Null Assigned Objects can Flag the GC that it is not in use and is ready to be Collected.
Assigning List Object to Null after the use, would also help GC to handle it well.
ie: myListVariable = null;
So that the memory can be cleared by the GC and can be freed from the unused Objects.
It's really not recommended, but you can force the garbage collector to run after you've cleared the list?
I found this link:
How to force garbage collector to run?
I'd look into implementing the iDisposable interface into your class. This would make it a managed resource and should automatically clear system resources when you're done with the data.
Good luck!
I have a groupbox named "radGroupBox1" that I want to open a user control in that.
This is my code:
radGroupBox1.Controls.Clear();
_main2 = new Forms.MainControl2();
radGroupBox1.Controls.Add(_main2);
_main2.Dock = DockStyle.Fill;
_main2.Frm = this;
_main2.Show();
My problem is every time I execute this code , My memory increase. I check it in task manager. For example if you click 10 times on my button(run code) , Memory will increase 10 time. How can i release Memory allocated to previous object ?
Is there any way to Dispose it or force GC to release memory?
As you can read in the documentation:
Calling the Clear method does not remove control handles from memory. You must explicitly call the Dispose method to avoid memory leaks.
So this means that you have to Dispose the user control yourself. Also, be sure that inside the user-control you are disposing any disposable resources.
radGroupBox1.Controls.Clear();
_main2?.Dispose();
_main2 = new Forms.MainControl2();
radGroupBox1.Controls.Add(_main2);
_main2.Dock = DockStyle.Fill;
_main2.Frm = this;
_main2.Show();
I am working on feedback application which have lots of form open and close operation. I noticed few changes in memory changes in my application when i start my application it takes 25 MB. With each feedback user give it increases 3 MB in memory usage. On every form i had used this.close() when it jumps from one to other or there is any close operation. What can be the possible reason of memory increases.
Do i need to call garbage collector manually, as everyone says its not good practice.
In this i am using dual monitor scenario in which application take snapshot of secondary screen after each 500 ms and shows it on primary screen. For this I am using the code shown below:
public EntryForm()
{
sc = Screen.AllScreens;
dbDms = new HondaDb(UtilityFunctions.getServerConnection());
db = new HondaDb(UtilityFunctions.getClientConnection());
bmpScreenshot = new Bitmap(sc[1].Bounds.Width,
sc[1].Bounds.Height,
PixelFormat.Format32bppArgb);
Create a graphics object from the bitmap.
gfxScreenshot = Graphics.FromImage(bmpScreenshot);
Timer timerClientScreen = new Timer();
timerClientScreen.Interval = 500;
timerClientScreen.Enabled = false;
timerClientScreen.Start();
timerClientScreen.Tick += new EventHandler(timer_TickClient);
}
void timer_TickClient(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// Take the screenshot from the upper left corner to the right bottom corner.
gfxScreenshot.CopyFromScreen(sc[1].Bounds.X, sc[1].Bounds.Y,
0, 0, sc[1].Bounds.Size, CopyPixelOperation.SourceCopy);
// Save the screenshot to the specified path that the user has chosen.
pictureBoxClient.Image = bmpScreenshot;
}
For closing of form on open of other I am using the code below
formOpen.show();
formClose.Close();
Suggest me how can I save memory usage.
It does, but just your UI objects. It isn't automatic for the variables you use. In an app like this, using big objects that take very little GC heap space but lots of unmanaged resources, the garbage collector doesn't typically run often enough to keep you out of trouble. You have to help and explicitly dispose the objects so you don't leave it up to the GC to take care of the job.
It may take too long for it to start running, you can build up a lot of unmanaged memory usage before it gets to run the finalizers. Potentially crashing your program with OOM, although you are still very far removed from that problem. Right now you are just running "heavy".
Add an event handler for the FormClosed event. You need to call the Dispose() method on the gfxScreenshot and bmpScreenshot objects. And surely those HondaDb objects need some kind of cleanup as well.
Do not assume that will instantly solve memory usage increments, the GC is not eager to release address space back to the operating system. Keeping it around instead with the assumption that you are likely going to have a need for it soon. The proper usage pattern is it stabilizing after a while at a reasonable number, then suddenly dropping and building back up. A saw-tooth pattern. Write a little unit test that calls creates and destroys your form object repeatedly, ensuring that it does the non-trivial jobs of taking the screenshot and accessing the dbase. Now you know with confidence that you don't have a run-away leak problem.
No, when you call Form.Close() you are just telling to close the form. the object is still there in memory and if you have a reference to it, it will be there until you have held that reference.
.NET has automatic garbage collection mechanism which collect objects that are garbage (you have no reference to them and they can not be accessed). So objects are removed from memory when they become garbage and .NET garbage collector starts it works. You can force executing garbage collector by calling GC.Collect().
More about GC
Have a look at this MSDN Thread. It's about dispoable Windows, this should release all ressource held by a an instance of a class. Then the garbage collector should do it's work.
My application keeps growing in size everytime I open and close a certain Form. I used dotTrace and came up with an ever growing list of object of type System.Drawing.Internal.GPStream which are creating byte arrays continuously without every disposing them. I did some research and found out the .net does not support any means of closing such memory streams. the following
foreach (Type t in Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetTypes())
{
if (t.IsClass && t.BaseType.Name.ToLower() == "form")
{
//Assembly ass = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly();
object obj = null;
obj = Activator.CreateInstance(t);
Form f = new Form();
f = (Form)obj;
if ((string)f.Tag != "DNI") // Do Not Import
{
DataRow dr = Formsdt.NewRow();
dr["Name"] = f.Name;
dr["Text"] = f.Text;
dr["Tag"] = f.Tag;
Formsdt.Rows.Add(dr);
}
}
}
The intent of this code is to loop over all Forms and retrieve the controls in order to set access rights to users, activating and deactivating controls as needed programmatically.
Any insight is appreciated.
Note that
While( i am opening and closing the form)
==> Memory Allocation keeps on increasing
Somethings not being disposed of properly. Do you have warnings that say X class is iDisposable and you're not disposing it? Look into using 'using' blocks.
See this :
"A FileStream involves unmanaged resources which could actually be
immediately freed upon calling Dispose. A MemoryStream, on the other
hand, stores a managed byte array in its _buffer variable, which is
not freed at disposal time. In fact, the _buffer is not even nulled in
the MemoryStream's Dispose method, which is a SHAMEFUL BUG IMO because
nulling the reference could make the memory eligible for GC right at
disposal time. Instead, a lingering (but disposed) MemoryStream
reference still holds onto memory. Therefore, once you dispose it, you
should also null it if it's still in scope." – Triynko Oct 25 '10 at
20:46
Is a memory leak created if a MemoryStream in .NET is not closed?
Creating Forms in a loop will cause problems, depending the code in it's constructor it can fire events that will choke the message loop. Just to check, try adding an application.doevents in the loop and watch if memory gets released.
Maybe you will need to refactor your classes in order to determine access on a property that is outside a form. Something like:
Class MyObject
Public my_form as Form
Public Tag as string
end class
So you don't need to instantiate a Form.
Regards,
MarianoC.
If I have a method like this:
public void Show()
{
Form1 f = new Form1();
f.ShowDialog();
}
Do I still need to call dispose on the form even though it will go out of scope, which will be eligible for garbage collection.
From some testing, calling this Show() multiple times .. at some point it seems like the GC collects it since I can see the memory spiking then it goes down at some point in time.
From MSDN it seems to say you MUST call dispose when the form is not needed anymore.
What tends to happen is if the item has purely managed resources, calling dispose is not necessarily required, but is strongly advised because it makes disposal deterministic. It isn't always required (in a technical sense) because those managed resources would likely themselves now be eligible for GC, or there is actually nothing to dispose by default and it's an extensibility point.
For unmanaged resources, the Dispose Pattern advises implementing a finalizer, which will be called on GC. If types do not implement the finalizer and dispose is not called, then it is possible (well, very likely) that resources would be left unhandled. Finalizers are the last chance offered by the runtime for clearing your stuff up - they are also time-limited.
Note, that it does not make GC or managed memory reclamation deterministic, disposal is not delete from C++. A disposed item could be a long way away from actually being collected. However, in the managed world, you don't care about deterministic collection, only resource management - in other words, disposal.
That said, I always make sure I call Dispose or use a using statement if a type is disposable, regardless of whether it uses managed or unmanaged resources - it is the expected convention:
public void Show()
{
using (var f = new Form1())
{
f.ShowDialog();
} // Disposal, even on exceptions or nested return statements, occurs here.
}
Update:
After a discussion with Servy I feel I have to express this point as the reasoning behind my advice of disposing where possible. In the case of MemoryStream, it is clearly a disposable type, but actually does not dispose of anything currently.
Relying on this, however, is to rely on the implementation of MemoryStream. Were this to change to include an unmanaged resource, this would then mean that a reliance on MemoryStream not having anything to dispose becomes problematic.
Where possible (as is the case with IDisposable) I prefer to rely on the public contract. Working against the contract in this instance would mean I am safe from underlying implementation changes.
Although you rarely have to manually dispose in C# imo, you could try it like this:
public void Show()
{
using (Form1 f = new Form1())
{
f.ShowDialog();
}
}
Then at the last accolade of the using part it will get disposed of automatically.
ShowDialog has side effect of keeping the GDI objects alive. In order to avoid GDI leak we need to dispose the ShowDialog appropriately. Where as Show method does not have any implication and GDI will be released appropriately. It is recommended to dispose the showDialog and do not rely on Garbage collector.
You could simply do:
using (var f = new Form1())
f.ShowDialog();
If you want to explicitly dispose, use
using(Form1 f = new Form1()){
f.ShowDialog();
}
This ensures Dispose() is called, as well as it occurs immediately
In your specific example, no, it's unlikely that it would be particularly useful. Forms do not hold onto a significant amount of resources, so if it takes a little bit longer for some portion of it's code to get cleaned up it isn't going to cause a problem. If that form just happens to be holding onto a control that is used to, say, play a video, then maybe it's actually holding onto some significant number of resources, and if you actually do dispose of those resources in the dispose method then it's worth taking the time to call dispose. For 99% of your forms though, their Dispose method will be empty, and whether you call it or not is unlikely to have any (or any noticeable) effect on your program.
The reason that it's there is primarily to enable the ability to dispose of resources in those 1% of cases where it's important.
It's also worth noting that when a Form is closed its Dispose method is already being called. You would only ever need to add a using or explicit Dispose call if you want to dispose of a Forms resources before that form is closed. (That sounds like a generally bad idea to me). This is easy enough to test. Just create a project with two forms. Have the second form attach an event handler to the Disposing event and show a message box or something. Then when you create an instance of that form and show it (as a dialog or not) you'll see that when you close it the message box will pop up right away, even if you keep the 'Form' instance around and without you ever needing to add a using or Dispose call.
Yes, you need and MUST call Dispose or use using statement, otherwise it can be, that instance remains in memory.
You can check it, if you put a Timer to the form and set a break point in the Timer.Tick handler. Even after closing the form without Dispose the handler will be called.