I declare a model with 4 string fields. 3 of which are read-only on the form:
public class HomeModel
{
[ReadOnly(true)]
[DisplayName("Service Version")]
public string ServiceVersion { get; set; }
[ReadOnly(true)]
[DisplayName("Session Id")]
public string SessionId { get; set; }
[ReadOnly(true)]
[DisplayName("Visiting from")]
public string Country { get; set; }
[DisplayName("Search")]
public string SearchString { get; set; }
}
I pass the model, after populating it, to my form:
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult Index()
{
var model = new HomeModel
{
Country = "Australia",
SearchString = "Enter a search",
ServiceVersion = "0.1",
SessionId = "76237623763726"
};
return View(model);
}
And the form is displayed as I expect:
<h2>Simple Lookup</h2>
#Html.LabelFor(m=>m.ServiceVersion): #Model.ServiceVersion<br/>
#Html.LabelFor(m=>m.SessionId): #Model.SessionId<br/>
#Html.LabelFor(m=>m.Country): #Model.Country<br/>
<p>
#using(Html.BeginForm())
{
#Html.LabelFor(m => m.SearchString)
#Html.TextBoxFor(m => m.SearchString)
<button type="submit" name="btnSearch">Search</button>
}
</p>
But, when I submit the form, and get the model back from the form, only the value of the SearchString is populated.
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Index(HomeModel model)
{
return View(model);
}
Is it right that the other fields have been 'lost'? Does MVC not preserve the other members of the model class? And if this is expected - is there a way to re-get these? Or would I need to go back to my database, populate the model with the old values, and then use the new values from the form model?
It's possible the validity of wanting to read 'read-only' fields back from the model is questioned.. which is fair - but in the event that I find something suspect about the posted data, maybe I want to re-show the screen, and not have to re-read the data from a database again?
This is the correct behavior. Only the elements inside form will be posted to your action. Since it is posting the form so your fields should be inside the form in order to get them on your post method.
Update
Also, you cannot read particular field on your action method if you have taken that field readonly on your view. eg: displaying using #Html.LabelFor. In order to get field back on your action use #Html.HiddenFor if field is not to be edited.
Related
I have a ViewModel that has a complex object as one of its members. The complex object has 4 properties (all strings). I'm trying to create a re-usable partial view where I can pass in the complex object and have it generate the html with html helpers for its properties. That's all working great. However, when I submit the form, the model binder isn't mapping the values back to the ViewModel's member so I don't get anything back on the server side. How can I read the values a user types into the html helpers for the complex object.
ViewModel
public class MyViewModel
{
public string SomeProperty { get; set; }
public MyComplexModel ComplexModel { get; set; }
}
MyComplexModel
public class MyComplexModel
{
public int id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Address { get; set; }
....
}
Controller
public class MyController : Controller
{
public ActionResult Index()
{
MyViewModel model = new MyViewModel();
model.ComplexModel = new MyComplexModel();
model.ComplexModel.id = 15;
return View(model);
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Index(MyViewModel model)
{
// model here never has my nested model populated in the partial view
return View(model);
}
}
View
#using(Html.BeginForm("Index", "MyController", FormMethod.Post))
{
....
#Html.Partial("MyPartialView", Model.ComplexModel)
}
Partial View
#model my.path.to.namespace.MyComplexModel
#Html.TextBoxFor(m => m.Name)
...
how can I bind this data on form submission so that the parent model contains the data entered on the web form from the partial view?
thanks
EDIT: I've figured out that I need to prepend "ComplexModel." to all of my control's names in the partial view (textboxes) so that it maps to the nested object, but I can't pass the ViewModel type to the partial view to get that extra layer because it needs to be generic to accept several ViewModel types. I could just rewrite the name attribute with javascript, but that seems overly ghetto to me. How else can I do this?
EDIT 2: I can statically set the name attribute with new { Name="ComplexModel.Name" } so I think I'm in business unless someone has a better method?
You can pass the prefix to the partial using
#Html.Partial("MyPartialView", Model.ComplexModel,
new ViewDataDictionary { TemplateInfo = new TemplateInfo { HtmlFieldPrefix = "ComplexModel" }})
which will perpend the prefix to you controls name attribute so that <input name="Name" ../> will become <input name="ComplexModel.Name" ../> and correctly bind to typeof MyViewModel on post back
Edit
To make it a little easier, you can encapsulate this in a html helper
public static MvcHtmlString PartialFor<TModel, TProperty>(this HtmlHelper<TModel> helper, Expression<Func<TModel, TProperty>> expression, string partialViewName)
{
string name = ExpressionHelper.GetExpressionText(expression);
object model = ModelMetadata.FromLambdaExpression(expression, helper.ViewData).Model;
var viewData = new ViewDataDictionary(helper.ViewData)
{
TemplateInfo = new System.Web.Mvc.TemplateInfo
{
HtmlFieldPrefix = string.IsNullOrEmpty(helper.ViewData.TemplateInfo.HtmlFieldPrefix) ?
name : $"{helper.ViewData.TemplateInfo.HtmlFieldPrefix}.{name}"
}
};
return helper.Partial(partialViewName, model, viewData);
}
and use it as
#Html.PartialFor(m => m.ComplexModel, "MyPartialView")
If you use tag helpers, the partial tag helper accepts a for attribute, which does what you expect.
<partial name="MyPartialView" for="ComplexModel" />
Using the for attribute, rather than the typical model attribute, will cause all of the form fields within the partial to be named with the ComplexModel. prefix.
You can try passing the ViewModel to the partial.
#model my.path.to.namespace.MyViewModel
#Html.TextBoxFor(m => m.ComplexModel.Name)
Edit
You can create a base model and push the complex model in there and pass the based model to the partial.
public class MyViewModel :BaseModel
{
public string SomeProperty { get; set; }
}
public class MyViewModel2 :BaseModel
{
public string SomeProperty2 { get; set; }
}
public class BaseModel
{
public MyComplexModel ComplexModel { get; set; }
}
public class MyComplexModel
{
public int id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
...
}
Then your partial will be like below :
#model my.path.to.namespace.BaseModel
#Html.TextBoxFor(m => m.ComplexModel.Name)
If this is not an acceptable solution, you may have to think in terms of overriding the model binder. You can read about that here.
I came across the same situation and with the help of such informative posts changed my partial code to have prefix on generated in input elements generated by partial view
I have used Html.partial helper giving partialview name and object of ModelType and an instance of ViewDataDictionary object with Html Field Prefix to constructor of Html.partial.
This results in GET request of "xyz url" of "Main view" and rendering partial view inside it with input elements generated with prefix e.g. earlier Name="Title" now becomes Name="MySubType.Title" in respective HTML element and same for rest of the form input elements.
The problem occurred when POST request is made to "xyz url", expecting the Form which is filled in gets saved in to my database. But the MVC Modelbinder didn't bind my POSTed model data with form values filled in and also ModelState is also lost. The model in viewdata was also coming to null.
Finally I tried to update model data in Posted form using TryUppdateModel method which takes model instance and html prefix which was passed earlier to partial view,and can see now model is bound with values and model state is also present.
Please let me know if this approach is fine or bit diversified!
I have an a href link to a page which adds a parameter to the link for example:
tsw/register-your-interest?Course=979
What I am trying to do is to extract the value in Course i.e 979 and display it in the view. When attempting with the below code, I only return with 0 rather than the course value expected. ideally I'd like to avoid using routes.
Here is the view:
<div class="contact" data-component="components/checkout">
#using (Html.BeginUmbracoForm<CourseEnquiryPageSurfaceController>("PostCourseEnquiryForm", FormMethod.Post, new { id = "checkout__form" }))
{
//#Html.ValidationSummary(false)
#Model.Course;
}
And my controller:
public ActionResult CourseEnquiry(string Course)
{
var model = Mapper.Map<CourseEnquiryVM>(CurrentContent);
model.Course = Request.QueryString["Course"];
return model
}
This is the View Model:
public class CourseEnquiryVM : PageContentVM
{
public List<OfficeLocation> OfficeLocations { get; set; }
public string Test { get; set; }
public string Course { get; set; }
public List<Source> SourceTypes { get; set; }
}
SOLUTION:
After some research and comments I've adjusted the code to the below which now retrieves the value as expected
#Html.HiddenFor(m => m.Course, new { Value = #HttpContext.Current.Request.QueryString["Course"]});
Thanks all
Based on the form code you provided you need to use #Html.HiddenFor(m => m.Course) instead of just #Model.Course. #Model.Course just displays the value as text instead of building a input element that will be sent back to your controller.
If your problem is with a link prior to the view you referenced above, here's what I'd expect to work:
View with link:
#model CourseEnquiryVM
#Html.ActionLink("MyLink","CourseEnquiry","CourseController", new {course = #Model.Course}, null)
CourseController:
public ActionResult CourseEnquiry(string course)
{
// course should have a value at this point
}
In your view, you are only displaying the value of Course.. which isn't able to be submitted. You need to incorporate the value of course with a form input element (textbox, checkbox, textarea, hidden, etc.).
I would highly suggest using EditorFor or Textboxfor, but because your controller action is expecting just a string parameter you could just use Editor or TextBox.
#using (Html.BeginUmbracoForm<CourseEnquiryPageSurfaceController>("PostCourseEnquiryForm", FormMethod.Post, new { id = "checkout__form" }))
{
//#Html.ValidationSummary(false)
#Html.TextBox(Model.Course, null, new { #class = "form-control"});
<input type="submit" value="Submit" />
}
Then you should just be able to do this in your controller:
public ActionResult CourseEnquiry(string course) // parameter variables are camel-case
{
var model = Mapper.Map<CourseEnquiryVM>(CurrentContent);
if(!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(course))
model.Course = course;
return model;
}
Let me know if this helps.
I have a table in database which has 1 GUID column. It's mapped to entity as simple string property:
[Required]
public string Code {get;set;}
And I want the client to see this property as 4 textboxes? each of them contains a part of:
Code.Split(new[] {"-"}, StringSplitOptions.None)
I know how to validate this property by RegularExpressinAttribute if hole value will be displayed in 1 html textbox. But I want that it parsed on 4 parts before showing to user and combined together after user edit those textboxes. So can you, please, help me how to make validation on server and on client. Thank you!
You should create a view model for your view which has four seperate properties
public class CreateCodeVm
{
[Required]
public string CodePart1 { set;get;}
[Required]
public string CodePart2 { set;get;}
[Required]
public string CodePart3 { set;get;}
[Required]
public string CodePart4 { set;get;}
}
And you will use this view model to transfer data between your view and action methods. Once you read the value in your action method you can use it to save to your db where you might use the Entity class created by your ORM.
When you have to show this to user, read the Guid and convert to a string then split.
public ActionResult Edit(int id)
{
var vm = new CreateCodeVm();
var guidVariable = GetGuidFromYourDataBaseSomeHave();
var parts = guidVariable.ToString().Split('-');
vm.CodePart1 = parts[0];
vm.CodePart2 = parts[1];
vm.CodePart3 = parts[2];
vm.CodePart4 = parts[3];
return View(vm);
}
and in your view
#model CreateCodeVm
#using(Html.BeginForm())
{
#Html.TextBoxFor(s=>s.CodePart1)
#Html.ValidationMessageFor(s=>s.CodePart1)
#Html.TextBoxFor(s=>s.CodePart2)
#Html.ValidationMessageFor(s=>s.CodePart2)
#Html.TextBoxFor(s=>s.CodePart3)
#Html.ValidationMessageFor(s=>s.CodePart3)
#Html.TextBoxFor(s=>s.CodePart4)
#Html.ValidationMessageFor(s=>s.CodePart4)
<input type="submit" />
}
And in your HttpPost action you can check for validation errors
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Edit(CreateCodeVm model)
{
if(ModelState.IsValid)
{
//save and return(redirect result) something
}
return View(model);
}
While this will address your issue of validating 4 separate strings, It might bring another issue. What if you 2 users enter the same value for all four parts ? You will generate the same Guid from that ? It might cause you problems if your db column is of type uniqueidentifier.
I've looked, tried several different solutions and haven't found anything that works (at least, not something with an example close enough to what I want for me to follow). I'm sure I'm missing something that would be a simple thing to a more experienced coder. Help?
I have a Model called Residents. It includes ResidentID, PFName, PLName. I have a controller for Residents. I have CRUD views for Residents. All working just fine.
I have a Model called Logs. It includes LogID, ResidentID, Comments. I have a controller for Logs. I have CRUD views for Logs. All working just fine.
I can display all the log entries for a Resident. Works fine. After a Log entry has been created, I can display the PFName using the method
#Html.DisplayFor(model => model.Resident.PFName)
Next, I want to Create a new log entry for a selected Resident.
That's where I'm having the problem. I would like the "Create" view (for the Log) to display the ResidentFName and ResidentLName of the selected resident, not the ResidentID.
A this point, from the Details view for a Resident, I have a CreateLog link.
#Html.ActionLink("New Log Entry", "../Log/Create", new { #ResidentID = Model.ResidentID})
This (likely not the best way) gives me a URL with the value of the selected ID
http://localhost:999/Log/Create?ResidentID=1
The value for the ResidentID is correct; it changes depending on which Resident is selected.
This value is correctly entered
#Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.ResidentID)
on the new CreateLog page using the Log Controller Create action.
public ActionResult Create(int ResidentID)
I plan to hide the ResidentID TextBox so the user doesn't see it. It seems I have to make it available in the form to be able create a new log entry.
The CreateLog form currently works as I have it now. I can create a log entry and verify that entry has been correctly recorded for the Resident.
But, I would like the form to display the PFName and PLName for the Resident so the user has visible feedback for which Resident was selected.
I believe that the related data (PFName and PLName) I want has to be passed to the CreateLog form .... somehow. I can't get it from the form.
Since there's only the unsaved entry for ResidentID, I can't use the value from the CreateLog form it to display related data. As mentioned, for the Lists, there is no such problem. It's only for CreateLog.
I've tried adding the data to the URL. Not working. I've tried setting the strings in the Controller (and the URL). Not working. I've looked at setting a cookie, but haven't ever done that so not sure what to set or where to put it or how to get the values from it. I've looked at setting a variable in the controller ... (have that working to display drop down lists, but a list to select from is not what I need -- I want the matching values from the related table).
Log.LogID(PK, Identity)
Log.ResidentID(FK)
Resident.PFName
Resident.PLName
I can directly create a view with these tables/fields in my SQLDB and update it.
Assuming a view model which looks something like this:
public class CreateLogViewModel
{
public int ResidentID { get; set; }
public string PFName { get; set; }
public string PLName { get; set; }
public string SomeLogCreationProperty { get; set; }
// other properties
}
Your controller could look something like this:
public ActionResult Create(int ResidentID)
{
var model = db.Residents.Where(r => r.ResidentID == ResidentID)
.Select(r => new CreateLogViewModel
{
ResidentID = r.ResidentID,
PFName = r.PFName,
PLName = r.PLName
// other properties
});
return View(model);
}
Then the view:
#model CreateLogViewModel
#using (Html.BeginForm())
{
#Html.HiddenFor(m => m.ResidentID)
#Html.HiddenFor(m => m.PFName)
#Html.HiddenFor(m => m.PLName)
#Html.EditorFor(m => m.SomeLogCreationProperty)
// other properties
<input type="submit" />
}
This would then POST back to:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Create(CreateLogViewModel model)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
return RedirectToAction("Index");
}
// Redisplay the form with errors
return View(model);
}
Expanding on John H and StuartLC answers, you need to use ViewModels and the following workflow:
Database->(load)->Model->Controller->(convert)->ViewModel->View
and
View->ViewModel->Controller->(convert)->Model->(save)->Database
So lets says you have the following models:
namespace Models
{
public class Residents
{
public int ResidentID { get; set; }
public string PFName { get; set; }
public string PLName { get; set; }
//...
}
public class Logs
{
public int LogID { get; set; }
public int ResidentID { get; set; }
public string Comments { get; set; }
//...
}
}
You need a ViewModel that combines the data you need for display and input in your Log\CreateView:
namespace ViewModels
{
public class ResidentLog
{
public int ResidentID { get; set; }
public string PFName { get; set; }
public string PLName { get; set; }
public string Comments { get; set; }
//...
}
}
Then inside the controller:
public class LogController : Controller
{
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult Create(int ResidentID)
{
// Run in debug and make sure the residentID is the right one
// and the resident exists in the database
var resident = database.Residents.Find(residentID);
var model = new ViewModels.ResidentLog
{
ResidentID = resident.ResidentID,
PFName = resident.PFName,
PLName = resident.PLName,
Comments = string.Empty,
// ...
};
// Run in debug and make sure model is not null and of type ResidentLog
// and has the PFName and PLName
return View(model);
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Create(ViewModels.ResidentLog model)
{
if (!ModelState.IsValid)
return View(model);
var log = new Models.Logs
{
// Assumes LogID gets assigned by database?
ResidentID = model.ResidentID,
Comments = model.Comments,
};
// Run in debug and make sure log has all required fields to save
database.Logs.Add(log);
database.SaveChanges();
return RedirectToAction("Index"); // Or anywhere you want to redirect
}
}
Then your Log\CreateView:
#model ViewModels.ResidentLog
<!-- Display the values needed -->
<div>#Model.ResidentID - #Model.PFName - #Model.PLName</div>
#using (var form = Html.BeginForm(...))
{
<!-- This saves the values for the post, but in fact only ResidentID is actually used in the controller -->
#Html.HiddenFor(m => m.ResidentID)
#Html.HiddenFor(m => m.PFName)
#Html.HiddenFor(m => m.PLName)
#Html.EditorFor(m => m.Comments)
<input type="submit" />
}
You need to provide the additional information to the view.
This can be done in at least 2 ways
Use the ViewBag dynamic as a quick and dirty cheap and cheerful container to pass everything the view needs from the controller.
(preferred) Use a custom ViewModel with a tailor made class which holds everything the view needs. This is generally preferred as it is statically typed.
(I'm assuming that resident is already persisted in the database by the time the Log controller is called - you might need to fetch it elsewhere)
So, in your log controller, here's an example of using ViewBag:
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult Create(int residentID)
{
ViewBag.Resident = Db.Residents.Find(residentId);
return View();
}
You can then show the resident properties on the view by utilizing the ViewBag.
Edit
Yes, by persisted I meant in the Db - apologies about using unclear jargon.
Here's another example of ViewBag approach (the idea is to create a new Comment for another object):
Doing this the cheap + cheesy ViewModel way - in the HTTPGet Controller Create method:
public ActionResult Create(string objectType, int objectId)
{
// This is equivalent to youn fetching your resident and storing in ViewBag
ViewModel.Object = FetchSomeObject(objectType, objectId);
return View();
}
And in the View I use this (The ViewBag is accessible to Controller and View):
<title>#string.Format("Add new Comment for {0} {1}", ViewBag.Object.ObjectType, ViewBag.Object.Name);</title>
As you say, you will also need to do add a hidden for the ResidentId in your create log form
As per #JohnH's answer (+1), the BETTER way to do this (than using the magic ViewBag dynamic) is to create a custom ViewModel specifically for this screen. The ViewModel can either be reused both ways (GET: Controller => View and POST : Browser => Controller, or you even have separate ViewModels for the Get and Post legs.
With much thanks to all, I have it working. The final piece was telling the controller to return the model (nl). Here's the full spec for what's working:
I have created a ViewModel that includes
public class NewLog
{
public int ResidentID { get; set; }
public string PFName { get; set; }
public string PLName { get; set; }
public string Comment { get; set; }
// other properties
}
In the LogController,
public ActionResult Create(int ResidentID)
{
var resident = db.Residents.Find(ResidentID);
var nl = new NewLog
{
ResidentID = ResidentID,
PFName = resident.PFName,
PLName = resident.PLName,
Comment = string.Empty,
};
return View(nl);
}
In the Create.cshtml page,
#model My.Models.NewLog
The required ResidentID to be recorded with the new Log Entry
#Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.ResidentID, new {#Type = "Hidden"})
And the related, user-friendly display boxes for the person's name
#Html.DisplayFor(model => model.PFName)
#Html.DisplayFor(model => model.PLName)
And in the URL which is used to access the create page,
#Html.ActionLink("New Log Entry", "../Log/Create", new { #ResidentID = item.ResidentID, item.PFName, item.PLName})
My Controller populates my Model with a list with strings that appear in a DropDownList in my View. When the view is posted back to my Controller, that list is suddenly null. Why is it null, and what happened to the list of strings I created?
The list was properly populated and shows up in the View. The remainder of the form elements DO properly post back. For example, selectedName has whatever name the user clicked on. The only thing that is not posting back is nameList.
Here is the relevant part of my model,
public class MyModel
{
[Display(Name = "Selected")]
public string selectedName{ get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Names")]
public List<string> nameList{ get; set; }
}
the relevant Get and Post parts of my Controller,
public class MyController: Controller
{
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult Index()
{
List<string> nameList= getNames();
MyModel model = new MyModel()
model.nameList= nameList;
// Now, model.nameList has a bunch of stuff in it
return View(model);
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Index(MyModel model)
{
if(model.nameList== null)
{
cry();
postOnStackOverflow();
}
return View(model);
}
}
and the relevant part of my View (which is encapsulated inside of a form).
<p>
#Html.LabelFor(c => c.nameList):
#Html.DropDownListFor(c => c.selectedName, new SelectList(Model.nameList), new { onchange = "this.form.submit();" })
</p>
Only the value of the drop down list is posted when you post the form. I assume that your control in question is on a form.
I am not sure why you want to always return to the view you posted from, but you need to repopulate the list:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Index(MyModel model)
{
List<string> names = getNames();
model.nameList = names;
return View(model);
}
That is the expected behaviour considering what you have in your view. You need to reload the namelist collection property incase you are returning model to the same view again.
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Index(MyModel model)
{
if(ModelState.IsValid)
{
// Save and redirect
}
//reload the collection again and return the model to the view
model.nameList=getNames();
return View(model);
}