ASP.NET MVC: Ignore field(s) when editing - c#

As I'm in the progress of learning ASP.NET MVC, I ran into a question and into some trouble
I'm trying to create a simple blog, just to test out what I have learned so far. But when it comes to editing and leaving a field i run into a problem.
I'm trying to edit an already submitted post on my blog, the post contains few fields: Id, Headline, Message, Author and Date for the submission which should not be edited, just left as it is.
Here is some code:
My post model:
namespace MyBlock.Models
{
public class Post
{
public int Id { get; set; }
[Required]
public string Author { get; set; }
[Required]
public string Headline { get; set; }
[Required]
public string Message { get; set; }
public DateTime Date { get; set; }
}
}
My edit:
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult Edit(int id = 0)
{
Post post = db.Posts.Find(id);
if (post != null) {
return View(post);
}
return HttpNotFound();
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Edit(Post post)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid) {
db.Entry(post).State = EntityState.Modified;
db.SaveChanges();
return RedirectToAction("Index", "Home");
}
return View(post);
}
And my view for edit:
#model MyBlock.Models.Post
#{
ViewBag.Title = "Edit";
}
<h2>Rediger "#Model.Headline"</h2>
#using (Html.BeginForm()) {
#Html.LabelFor(u => u.Author)
#Html.TextBoxFor(u => u.Author)
#Html.LabelFor(u => u.Headline)
#Html.TextBoxFor(u => u.Headline)
#Html.LabelFor(u => u.Message)
#Html.TextAreaFor(u => u.Message)
<input type="submit" value="Gem" />
}
I know I could throw in a #HiddenFor(u => u.Date) and the same date would be submitted. But I bet there is another way than having it as a hidden field in the source code? I mean this isn't that secure in another example? So I want something else than hidden field here. Can you guys help me out?
If I try to run this as it is. I'm getting an error which is my Date isn't set, which is logic because it want to update that one aswell. But I dont want it to. I want to leave it optional if you could say that.

Don't take candy from strangers
In other words, don't take the information from the client and directly update the DB. You should enforce your business rules on the server side and not trust the client to do it for you.
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Edit(Post post)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid) {
var dbPost = db.Posts.FirstOrDefault(p => p.Id == post.Id);
if (dbPost == null)
{
return HttpNotFound();
}
dbPost.Author = post.Author;
dbPost.Message = post.Message;
dbPost.Headline = post.Headline;
db.SaveChanges();
return RedirectToAction("Index", "Home");
}
return View(post);
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Add(Post post)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid) {
var dbPost = db.Create<Post>();
dbPost.Author = post.Author;
dbPost.Message = post.Message;
dbPost.Headline = post.Headline;
dbPost.Date = DateTime.Now(); // Don't trust client to send current date
db.SaveChanges();
return RedirectToAction("Index", "Home");
}
return View(post);
}
In my own project I enforce rules like this at the domain layer by adding custom validation rules to the ValidateEntity method.

DateTime is a value type, and cannot be null. Thus, it can never be optional.
You need to make a it a nullable type. ie.
public DateTime? Date {get;set;}
In general, most value types in a ViewModel should be nullable, then you use Required attributes to enforce that they contain a value. This allows you to tell whether they failed to enter a value, or whether it's a default value.
In your controller, you can then check if the Date has a value with Date.HasValue and if so, then save the date.
In regards to security, in this case it's not raelly an issue. Assuming someone has access to the page (they pass authorization) and they have the right to update the date, then it doesn't matter if the user can bypass it. All they can do is submit a valid date format. Unless you want to add logic to ensure that the date is within a specific time period, then you don't have to worry. The ModelBinder will not bind to a non-valid date format.
If you want to control whether the user can update the date, say based on role, then you could add logic to your controller to check if the date has a value and the user is in the correct role, otherwise issue an error.
UPDATE:
I think the easiest solution here is to do two things. The first is to make Date nullable, as I mention above. Although this is not strictly necessary if you do not have a form field for Date in your view, if you were to add a form field later then you would get a validation error if you left the textbox empty. I like to prevent future errors from occurring if possible. Also, should someone be posting values to your Edit action manually, and they include a blank Date field, it will fail to validate, rather than simply ignore it. Making the value nullable allows the value to be completely ignored regardless of its value.
Second, is do what #p.s.w.g suggests, and only update the fields that you want updated. Retrieve the post from the database, then update all fields except Id and Date. Then call SaveChanges().

Just my 2cents here. I know this is a simple situation and the answer given is nice and straightforward. But as that list of attributes grows then it could get difficult.
So a different approuch would be along these lines
var t = _db.Blog.Where(x => x.ID == id).FirstOrDefault();
var info = typeof(Blog).GetProperties();
//properties you don't want to update
var properties = info.Where(x => x.Name != "xxx" && x.Name != "xxxx").ToList();
foreach(var p in properties)
{
p.SetValue(t, p.GetValue(temp.Volunteer));
}
_db.Entry(t).State = EntityState.Modified;
_db.SaveChanges();
But if you are just doing a few fields then the above makes sense.
Just use your noggin!

Related

What does ModelState.IsValid do?

When I do a create method i bind my object in the parameter and then I check if ModelState is valid so I add to the database:
But when I need to change something before I add to the database (before I change it the ModelState couldn't be valid so I have to do it)
why the model state still non valid.
What does this function check exactly?
This is my example:
[HttpPost]
[ValidateAntiForgeryToken]
public ActionResult Create([Bind(Include = "EncaissementID,libelle,DateEncaissement,Montant,ProjetID,Description")] Encaissement encaissement) {
encaissement.Montant = Convert.ToDecimal(encaissement.Montant);
ViewBag.montant = encaissement.Montant;
if (ModelState.IsValid) {
db.Encaissements.Add(encaissement);
db.SaveChanges();
return RedirectToAction("Index", "Encaissement");
};
ViewBag.ProjetID = new SelectList(db.Projets, "ProjetId", "nomP");
return View(encaissement);
}
ModelState.IsValid indicates if it was possible to bind the incoming values from the request to the model correctly and whether any explicitly specified validation rules were broken during the model binding process.
In your example, the model that is being bound is of class type Encaissement. Validation rules are those specified on the model by the use of attributes, logic and errors added within the IValidatableObject's Validate() method - or simply within the code of the action method.
The IsValid property will be true if the values were able to bind correctly to the model AND no validation rules were broken in the process.
Here's an example of how a validation attribute and IValidatableObject might be implemented on your model class:
public class Encaissement : IValidatableObject
{
// A required attribute, validates that this value was submitted
[Required(ErrorMessage = "The Encaissment ID must be submitted")]
public int EncaissementID { get; set; }
public DateTime? DateEncaissement { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<ValidationResult> Validate(ValidationContext validationContext)
{
var results = new List<ValidationResult>();
// Validate the DateEncaissment
if (!this.DateEncaissement.HasValue)
{
results.Add(new ValidationResult("The DateEncaissement must be set", new string[] { "DateEncaissement" });
}
return results;
}
}
Here's an example of how the same validation rule may be applied within the action method of your example:
[HttpPost]
[ValidateAntiForgeryToken]
public ActionResult Create([Bind(Include = "EncaissementID,libelle,DateEncaissement,Montant,ProjetID,Description")] Encaissement encaissement) {
// Perform validation
if (!encaissement.DateEncaissement.HasValue)
{
this.ModelState.AddModelError("DateEncaissement", "The DateEncaissement must be set");
}
encaissement.Montant = Convert.ToDecimal(encaissement.Montant);
ViewBag.montant = encaissement.Montant;
if (ModelState.IsValid) {
db.Encaissements.Add(encaissement);
db.SaveChanges();
return RedirectToAction("Index", "Encaissement");
};
ViewBag.ProjetID = new SelectList(db.Projets, "ProjetId", "nomP");
return View(encaissement);
}
It's worth bearing in mind that the value types of the properties of your model will also be validated. For example, you can't assign a string value to an int property. If you do, it won't be bound and the error will be added to your ModelState too.
In your example, the EncaissementID value could not have a value of "Hello" posted to it, this would cause a model validation error to be added and IsValid will be false.
It is for any of the above reasons (and possibly more) that the IsValid bool value of the model state will be false.
ModelState.IsValid will basically tell you if there is any issues with your data posted to the server, based on the data annotations added to the properties of your model.
If, for instance, you have a [Required(ErrorMessage = "Please fill")], and that property is empty when you post your form to the server, ModelState will be invalid.
The ModelBinder also checks some basic stuff for you. If, for instance, you have a BirthDate datepicker, and the property that this picker is binding to, is not a nullable DateTime type, your ModelState will also be invalid if you have left the date empty.
Here, and here are some useful posts to read.
You can find a great write-up on ModelState and its uses here.
Specifically, the IsValid property is a quick way to check if there are any field validation errors in ModelState.Errors. If you're not sure what's causing your Model to be invalid by the time it POST's to your controller method, you can inspect the ModelState["Property"].Errors property, which should yield at least one form validation error.
Edit: Updated with proper dictionary syntax from #ChrisPratt
This is not meant to be the best answer, but I find my errors by stepping through the ModelState Values to find the one with the error in Visual Studio's debugger:
My guess is that everyone with a question about why their ModelState is not valid could benefit from placing a breakpoint in the code, inspecting the values, and finding the one (or more) that is invalid.
This is not the best way to run a production website, but this is how a developer finds out what is wrong with the code.

Is it possible to have a generic [Bind] in c# methods?

what I try to do is to bind every incomming value from my response to a string or stringlist dynamicly / generic.
So assume I would know each POST-Value of my request, e.g.
string1 = Test
string2 = Test2
I would write:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult DoFoo(string string1, string string2)
{
}
or
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult DoFoo(string string1, [Bind(Prefix = "string2")string myString2)
{
}
My situation know is, that I have X strings with my post request. So I dont know the exact number nor the names to catch in my backend.
How to catch every given Post-value without knowing this / how to catch the values dynamicly?
I don't feel that why you have to use Prefix with BIND, when you have to bind every incoming field of response. Bind is not a good choice for that. You can use bind if you have multiple entities at the same time. Reference here
that I have X strings with my post request.
If you have to use all the fields then you can use FormCollection or Model object to receive those fields. FormCollection automatically receive all the fields from view and bind them to a collection. See this for proper example. And a code snippet is below for reference.
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Create(FormCollection collection)
{
try
{
Student student = new Student();
student.FirstName = collection["FirstName"];
student.LastName = collection["LastName"];
DateTime suppliedDate;
DateTime.TryParse(collection["DOB"], out suppliedDate);
student.DOB = suppliedDate;
student.FathersName = collection["FathersName"];
student.MothersName = collection["MothersName"];
studentsList.Add(student);
return RedirectToAction("Index");
}
catch
{
return View();
}
}
However if you have to deal with only one particular field/set of fields then you can use either Include or Exclude as per your convenience with BIND. Example shown here and code snipped is added below.
In following way you are telling that you only want to include "FirstName" of User model while receiving the form content. Everything else will be discarded.
[HttpPost]
public ViewResult Edit([Bind(Include = "FirstName")] User user)
{
// ...
}
And in following example you are telling that, please exclude "IsAdmin" field while receiving the fields. In this case, value of IsAdmin will be NULL, irrespective of any data entered/modified by end-user in view. However, in this way, except IsAdmin, data rest of the fields will be available with user object.
[HttpPost]
public ViewResult Edit([Bind(Exclude = "IsAdmin")] User user)
{
// ...
}

C# IgnoreDataMember attribute sets database field to null, how do I overcome this?

I have built a Web API with the usual rest methods.
I have a field in my database for tracking when a record was inserted (called InsertLogtime. This works fine.
My classes are generated automatically by EF6 using database first.
I don't want this to be serialised so I added the [IgnoreDataMember] attribute to that field using the standard partial metadata classes...
[MetadataType(typeof(MembersMetaData))]
public partial class Members { }
public class MembersMetaData
{
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.None)]
public int Id { get; set; }
[IgnoreDataMember]
public Nullable<DateTime> InsertLogtime { get; set; }
}
Now when I use fiddler to put data into the other fields, the InsertLogTime field is set to null.
More importantly, I don't want to show every field for put. The customer only needs to use the Id and a single other field. However, they also need to provide a full dataset (without the InsertLogtime) when doing a full post.
{
"Id":99,
"FirstName":"Jack Spratt",
"EMail":"someone#somewhere.com",
"Eligible":false
}
This all works fine when doing a POST. Even the insert log time is ok as a quick and dirty measure I just set it in the controller using DateTime.Now. I know I should be using a default in the database but I'll get to it later.
Ideally I would like the customer to only have to insert the following when doing a PUT:
{
"Id":99,
"Eligible":true
}
But I am not sure how to do this. And as mentioned, when I use the full version that I use for POST when doing a PUT, it sets the InsertLogTime field to null.
Here is my controller
[ResponseType(typeof(void))]
public IHttpActionResult PutMembers(int id, Members members)
{
if (!ModelState.IsValid)
return BadRequest(ModelState);
if (id != members.Id)
return BadRequest();
eligible = members.Eligible ?? false;
db.Entry(members).State = EntityState.Modified;
try
{
db.SaveChanges();
}
catch (DbUpdateConcurrencyException)
{
//Notthing of interest here.
}
return StatusCode(HttpStatusCode.NoContent);
}
Any help overcoming these problems would be really appreciated.

persisting dropdownlist between mvc post if the ModelState is Invalid

I have a simple form which saves the following entity
public class TravelInfo{
public int ID {get;set;}
public string CentreCode {get;set;}
public DateTime TravelDate {get;set;}
}
I have the standard 2 create methods in my controller - 1 get 1 post and am using this viewmodel to get stuff into the view.
public class TravelInfoVM{
public TravelInfo TravelInfo{get;set;}
public IEnumerable<SelectListItem> Centres {get;set;}
}
Controller methods...
public ActionResult Create(){
var CentresList = db.Centres.Select(c=> new SelectListItem {Text = c.Name, Value = c.Code}).ToList();
TravelInfoVM = new TravelInfoVM(){Centres = CentresList};
return View(TravelInfoVM);
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Create(TravelInfoVM model){
//the Centres part of the model at this point is empty
if(ModelState.IsValid){
//save
//redirect
}
//do i **REALLY** have to get it again as below, or can I hold on to it somehow?
model.Centres = db.Centres.Select(c=> new SelectListItem {Text = c.Name, Value = c.Code}).ToList();
return View(model);
}
the question is, do I really need to do a second round trip to the DB to get the list of Centres if the ModelState comes back as invalid? or is there a better/different way to persist this list across posts, until the user correctly enters the details required to save..? or do i have completely the wrong end of the stick..
Not without adding it to the session, which is an inappropriate use of the session. Otherwise, each request is a unique snowflake, even if it seems like it's the same because you're returning the same form with errors.
I wouldn't worry about this. It's just one query, and since it's the same query already issued previously, it will very likely (or at least could be) cached, so it may not actually hit the database, anyways.
One thing I would recommend though is abstracting the query so that your GET and POST actions will simply call a function that won't change, and if you need to make a change to how the select list is created, you just do it in one place:
internal void PopulateCentreChoices(TravelInfoVM model)
{
model.Centres = db.Centres.Select(c=> new SelectListItem {Text = c.Name, Value = c.Code}).ToList();
}
...
public ActionResult Create(){
var model = new TravelInfoVM();
PopulateCentreChoices(model);
return View(model);
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Create(TravelInfoVM model){
if(ModelState.IsValid){
//save
//redirect
}
PopulateCentreChoices(model);
return View(model);
}

Model binder to decrypt string and convert to int

I have a model which has a property id of type int.
I pass the id in the url like Detail/20 for fetching the data. But, now my customer says they don't want to see the id, since any one can modify and see other records.
Now, I've decided to encrypt and decrypt it, and assign it to another property: encId.
public ActionResult List()
{
foreach(Employee e in empList)
{
e.encId = MyUtil.Encrypt(id,"sessionid");
}
return View(empList);
}
Finally, I make my url like Detail/WOgV16ZKsShQY4nF3REcNQ==/.
Now, all I need is to decrypt it back to the original form and assign it to the property id of type int.
public ActionResult Detail(int id) //don't want (string id)
{
}
How can I write my model binder that decrypt and convert it to valid id? Also if any error/exception occurs, it has to redirect to 404 Error page. It might happen when user manually edits some useless text in the url (encrypted id).
First, this is not the way to go about securing your website and data. Please take a look at the issues with Security Through Obscurity. You would be better off defining sets of permissions on each employee record and who can or cannot edit them. Such an example could look like this:
public ActionResult Detail(int id)
{
if(MySecurityProvider.CanView(id, HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.Name){
return View();
}
Return RedirectToAction("PermissionIssue", "Errors");
}
With that said, to continue on the path you are on, simply do the decryption within the action result.
public ActionResult Detail(string Id)
{
int actualId;
try{
actualId = MyUtil.Decrypt(id);
}catch(Exception e){
//someone mucked with my encryption string
RedirectToAction("SomeError", "Errors");
}
var employee = MyEmployeeService.GetEmployeeById(actualId);
if(employee == null){
//This was a bad id
RedirectToAction("NotFound", "Errors");
}
Return View(employee);
}

Categories

Resources