Develop Reference

AXL API - Extremely long processing time of CS file

Just need a point in the right direction with this one.
I've created the Cisco Unified Call Manager API via the instructions provided by Cisco, the API for CUCM is called AXL.
It's currently in my C# WPF project and works just fine (i've retrieved some phone data successfully), the issue is that the API is in a single CS file that's 345K lines long. This is causing an extremely long delay when I attempt the first action using the API (after it has compiled).
As one user on the Cisco forum advised:
There is a very high chance that your problem is with the time that it takes the .net framework to generate the xml serialization assembly.
Pre-generate the xml serialization assembly when using AXL on .net and your first response will be MUCH faster.
I've tried to pre-generate it using the instructions from user brain backup in this thread. Unfortunately the first use of the API is still around ~45 seconds (it did reduce it by about a minute). I'm not extremely savvy with the debugging tools within Visual Studio so unsure how to check what exactly is causing the issue (but it certainly looks like an issue related to generating the XML).
I was wondering if anyone could recommend of a way to remove the unnecessary methods from the CS file (99% of it won't be used anyway) without having to manually re-create it. Any type of tool that can pull/delete methods and their dependencies from a CS file would be absolutely brilliant.

There is a way to check whether you method has been used or not and if used how many times and where check this out.
https://visualstudiomagazine.com/Blogs/Tool-Tracker/2014/12/Finding-Method-Property-Variable.aspx

It might make sense to pare the AXL WSDL itself and re-compile - as mentioned, it's unlikely you'll ever use anywhere near the whole schema.
You should be able to just edit AXLAPI.wsdl and remove all of the and elements except for the items you are actually useing.

Had the same issue, it was almost unusable with the delay. Two things that I have found to get around this with almost instant results.
Don't use the WSDL. Write your own methods to handle SOAP requests. Takes time and can be error prone but results are almost instant.
Use a tool that can handle large text files, like Notpad++ to open your WSDL generated code file and take only what methods out that you need. This is the method I've choose and it works great.
Also, I believe you could just use the executeSQLQuery methods and cut out a good portion of the rest of the code but I've yet to try it. Each method above I have tried without pregenerating the xml serialization. I found the problem to be with the generated C# axl code file size.

"URI formats are not supported." exception just started showing up in really old, unchanged code

Ok, I'm experiencing a truly random bug and I cannot find any reason why this would happen. I have an application that I update that was first developed MANY years ago. I work on a sizable dev team whose sole responsibility is to manage this application and we've come to accept that the project is a bit of a "franken-code" project. We are but humble developers in a line of many generations of developers who've inherited this project. (This will be important to know later.)
There is a portion of our application that deep within the initialization process calls the following code:
string strPath = System.IO.Path.GetDirectoryName(System.Reflection.Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().CodeBase);
string strFile = strPath.Substring(6) + "\\" + FILE_NAME;
Here's the deal. My fellow team members, and myself, have been able to modify and build higher-level, UI and DB related sections of our solution for an eternity. I, nor anyone else, has modified the above code, or any code in the same code file (or project within the solution, for that matter.)
However, today while working in a completely different section of my application I began to get some really odd "Out of Memory" exception errors. I'm not sure if that relates to my problem but I felt it was worth mentioning that after rebooting my machine and reloading the VS solution, I'm now consistently getting the following exception when I attempt to run a debugger test, when the initialization process attempts to execute the above mentioned snippet of code:
Exception: A first chance exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' occurred in mscorlib.dll
Message: URI formats are not supported.
I've googled this error message and it looks like the original dev was simply doing this wrong. This seems to be a common error, but what baffles me is that this has never been a problem until, randomly, today.
I know this is an odd question, but is there a way to fix this without modifying this code. As I mentioned, this is a really complex application that often feels a bit cobbled together. Our team is attempting to clean up, or replace, much of the applications functionality but there are portions we simply do not touch because we have no solid clue how the application will work once it is deployed to our production environment. This is a highly-critical application and it cannot be broken.
Might anyone have any clue what may cause this to "magically" start happening? Especially since I have been working in UI-related code, and no where near the low-level, configuration resolution section of code where this came from.
ADDITIONAL NOTES
We use source control. If I download, build an run an older revision of the application, it works.
We use AnkhSVN and when I inspect my changed files, again, there is nothing that has been changed that relates to the code that is now failing.
No one else in my team has ever seen this.
To my knowledge, I've not tweaked any setting associated with my project. I've taken a look at my project properties and everything looks normal. I guess there is a chance that I've hit some odd key-combo and enabled/disabled something through shortcut-keys, but I have no clue what that might be.
Any help is appreciated. Sorry for the novel. I'm just stumped and I'd rather not use a different method for acquiring this path string if there is ANY chance that altering this process could behave differently in different user environments.

I can only assume some working file within the Visual Studio that is associated with the project/solution had become corrupt. I searched through the text of my project files, and all of my code, and I didn't see anything out of place.
As I mentioned, we use source control. To attempt a fix, I pulled down the same source revision that I initially pulled for my current task. I compiled and ran the application. Everything worked properly in its "vanilla" state.
Next, I copied in all of the files I knew I had modified. I hadn't added any new project references or resources, so I just copied over the modified .cs files. I built and ran the application and I've had no trouble since the pull from my branch.
This does not answer the question of why this occurred, but this method can provide a solution to the problem.

I can confirm this change in Path.GetDirectoryName occured to me after installing VS 2015 and rebuilding our project in it so it seams to be .NET 4.6 feature.
Rebuilding the project again in VS 2013 returns the previous behaviour where Assembly.CodeBase with "file:" prefix is acceptable by Path.GetDirectoryName without any exception.
But rereading the MSDN documentation, there is a statement that "file:" paths are not supported, but this is not mentioned in ArgumentException thrown in VS 2015 code.

First of all, find out how many versions ago this started occuring: start with the current version, and work back changeset by changeset until it no longer fails.
It sounds like, for whatever reason, System.Reflection.Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().CodeBase now returns a string that GetDirectoryName doesn't like. So, check the project files, the .sln, the repo config, anything that could cause a file to be in a different location.
If you can't find anything there, check the other files from that same commit, even if they appear that they shouldn't be related.
First Chance Exceptions generally happen when you've got multiple threads happening, so check for new threads that weren't in the previous version. I've also had situations where First Chance exceptions would only get caught under certain situations, and are silently ignored otherwise, so look changes in Debug settings: it's possible that this problem has always existed, you just haven't had the right settings to catch it until now.
Remember that under a source control, other people can change things that are "yours", even if only by accident.

Hash of source codes at compile time in C#

Having a server that other devs use, I currently log the version of the dll they use. I do that by having the client that use Reflection to retrieve its version:
Assembly.GetEntryAssembly().GetName().Version.ToString();
It's nice, but since it come from dev that uses TFS and do themself the build, I can not see if they have the latest version of the sources. Is there a trick, like a compilation tag, that would easily allow a hash of the generating source code?
Note: I have try to send the MD5 of the dll (using assembly.Location), but it is useless since the hash value changes between 2 compilations (I suppose there is some compilation timestamp inside the generated dll).

This is most collaboraton issue then a coding.
In the moment that you find out that the version is old one.notify them about it.
If the real version is not old one, that means that developers before making buold did not increment the version ID, which is mistake.
In other words, ordanize it among people, and not relly on these kind of tools (if there is any). You trying to create a complicated tool, that will help you avoid mistakes, but humans will find a way to make them again.
So it's better to create solid relation structure among you, imo.

Create a tool on pre build event to hash/last-write-time your code files.
Write the result to a cs file or a embedded resource file.
The result file must exclude in above action.
For prevent skip build (up-to-date) feature not work,Compare the file before write.
And if youre opening the file in IDE will get a prompt `changed from out side' when build.

Seem there is no easy way to do it.

Monitoring .NET ASP.NET Applications

I have a number of applications running on top of ASP.NET I want to monitor. The main things I care about are:
Exceptions: We currently some custom code which will email us when an exception occurs. If the application is failing hard it will crash our outlook... I know (and use) elmah which partly solves the problem however it is still just a big table of exceptions with a pretty(ish) UI. I want something that makes sense of all of these exceptions (e.g. groups exceptions, alerts when new ones occur, tells me what the common ones are that I should fix, etc)
Logging: We currently log to files which are then accessible via a shared folder which dev's grep & tail. Does anyone know of better ways of presenting this information. In an ideal world I want to associate it with exceptions.
Performance: Request times, memory usage, cpu, etc. whatever stats I can get
I'm guessing this is probably going to be solved by a number of tools, has anyone got any suggestions?

You should take a look at Gibraltar not used it myself but looks very good! Also works with nLog and log4net so if you use those you are in luck!!

Well, we have exactly the same current solution. Emails upon emails litter my inbox and mostly get ignored. Over the holidays an error caused everyone in dev to hit their inbox limit ;)
So where are we headed with a solution?
We already generate classes for all our excpetions, they rarely get used from more than one place. This was essentially step one, but we started the code base this way.
We modified the generator to create unique HRESULT values for all exceptions.
Again we added a generator to create a .MC message resource file for every exception.
Now every exception can write itself to the Windows Event Log, and thus we removed all emails etc, and rely on the event log.
Now with an event log full of information, including unique message codes and parameters for each exception, we can use off-the-shelf tools to aggregate, monitor, and alert.
The exception generator (before modifications above) is located here:
http://csharptest.net/browse/src/Tools/Generators
It integrates with visual studio by replacing the ResX generator with this:
http://csharptest.net/browse/src/Tools/CmdTool
I have not yet published the MC generator, or the HRESULT generation; however, it will be available in the above locations when I get the time.
-- UPDATE --
All the tools and source are now available online for this. So where do I go from here?
Download the source or binaries from: http://code.google.com/p/csharptest-net/
Take a look at the help for CmdTool.exe Visual Studio Integration
Then review the help on Generators for ResX and MC files, there are several ways to generate MC files or complete message DLLs from ResX files. Pick the approach that fits you best.
Run CmdTool.exe REGISTER to register the tool with Visual Studio
Create a ResX file as normal, then change the custom tool to CmdTool
You will need to add some entries to the resx file. At minimal create the following:
".AutoLog" = true
".NextMessageId" = 1
".EventSource" = "HelloWorld"
"MyCustomException" = "Some exception text"
Other settings exampled by the NUnit: http://csharptest.net/browse/src/Tools/Generators/Test/TestResXAutoLog.cs#80
Now you should have an exception class being generated that writes log events. You will need to build the MC file as a pre/post build action with something like:
CSharpTest.Net.Generators.exe RESXTOMESSAGEDLL /output=MyCustomMessages.dll /input=TheProjectWithAResX.csproj
Lastly, you need to register it, run the framework's InstallUtil.exe MyCustomMessages.dll
That should get you started until I get time to document it all.

One suggestion from Ryans Roberts I really like is exceptioneer which seems to solve my exception woes at least.

I would first go for log4net. The SmtpAppender can wait for N exceptions to cumulate before sending an email and avoid crashing Outlook. And log4net also logs to log files that can be stored on network drives, read with cat and grep, etc.
About stats, you can perform a health/performance logging with the same tools, ie. spawn a thread that every minute logs CPU usage etc.
I don't have a concrete answer for the first part of question, since it implies automated log analysis and coalescence. At university, we made a tool that is designed to do part of these things but doesn't apply to your scenario (but it's two-way integrated with log4net).

In terms of handled exceptions or just typical logging l4ndash is worth a look. I always set our log4net to not only write out text files, but to append to the database. That way l4ndash can analyse it easily. It'll group your errors, let you see where bad things are occurring a lot. You get one free dev license
With Elmah we just pull down the logs periodically. It can exports as csv, then we use Excel do filter/group the data. It's not ideal, but it works. It would be nice to write a script to automate this a bit more. I've not seen much else out there for Elmah.

You can get some metrics on request times (and anything else that's saved) by running LogParser over the IIS logs.

We have built a simple monitoring app that sits on the desktop and flashes up red when there is either an exception written to the event log from one of the apps on the server or it writes an error to the error log table on the database. It also monitors the database health, checking fragmentation and the like.
The only problem we have with this is that it can be a little intrusive on the desktop as it keeps popping up with a red message box if there is a a problem. However it does encourage you to fix it asap.
We currently have this running on several of the developers machines. The improvement we are thinking of making is to have one monitoring app running on a server that then publishes an rss feed so that the app is only checking once in one place but we can consume the information from anywhere using whichever method we choose at the time (such as through our phones when we aren't in the office).

You can have an RSS feed select from your Exceptions table (and other things).
Then you can subscribe to the RSS feed in MS Outlook or on any smart phone. I use an RSS feed reader called NewsRob because it alerts me when there is something new.
I blog about how to do this HERE.
As a related step, I found a way to notify myself when something DIDN'T happen. That blog is HERE.

C# Creating a log system

I was reading the following article:
http://odetocode.com/articles/294.aspx
This article raised me a lot of question regarding logs.
(I don’t know if I should have made this in separated questions… but I don’t want to spam stackoverflow.com with questions of mine)
The 1st one is if I should store it in a .txt, or .xml file… or even in a table inside the database.
Probably saving in the .txt will be better regarding performance. But when someone needs to find something the .txt file, it may become a pain in the... neck.
So… which one should I use, and why?
The second one, is there any specific class to deal with “log” thing?
I have read several threads about this subject, and I didn’t find the answers to my questions.
Thanks in advance.

The easiest approach I've taken in the past is using log4net. That way you can configure the logging in the config file. If you need it to go to a database, set it up as such. If you want to be notified when a major error occurs, set it up that way.
As far as sorting through the logs, it really depends on the approach you want to take, and how much you plan on logging. Normally I log to a flat text file as I don't enable a lot of logging in my applications. So parsing through them isn't a big deal.

Unless you want to write a system for education purposes, I honestly think that you'd be best off sticking with log4net or nlog.
And further, you would probably be better off studying the code to those systems instead of writing your own.
As to your question, I would stick to a text file and buffer the messages before spitting them to disk.

Why bother inventing wheel? you can check MS enterprise library Logging Block.

definitely not xml.
with xml, you will need to read it all, parse it, add whatever, then generate the whole xml again, and write it back to hard disk. every single time you log something.
unless of course you append the nodes to the xml file manually, in which way you loose most of xml advantages.
warnings to fatal errors - whatever will help you to debug the application if it crashes - those logs i would store in a txt file.
append a new line for every entry.
this way you can also ask from your user to check it out (if you assist him via the phone).
if it's not a meta log, such as mentioned above, in other words, if it's anything related to the program itself you may need to analyze - keep on the db.

Regarding file vs database, it's up to you to choose.
File logs give greater performance but with pain of access.
If the logs are there just to rarely provide information (e.g. the app crashes and you need to know why), you're better off storing the logs in a file.
If you want to give access to those logs, analyze them, etc, you should store them in a database.
.net is really not my zone, but there are lots of reasons why you should use the framework's logging classes.

For my apps I have chosen to write to db. Its easier (for me) to read the logs this way. However I do not go log crazy as some people do, I only log what I need to log and nothing else.
I gave log4net a shot not to long ago and did not like it at all. It was a whole lot of junk to just write to a db and send an email. I ended up writing a custom logging class and it was a whole ~200 lines and took just a few hours. It works great, I don't have another dependency, and it can be easily changed.

If you're dealing with ASP.NET, ELMAH is another good logging tool. It's apparently what Microsoft's Scott Hanselman uses.
It does need some additional code to get it to work with ASP.NET MVC's HandleError attribute, though.

NLog and log4net both provide a rich logging API but neither addresses the challanges you face managing and analyzing all the data in your log files.
If you're willing to consider a commerical tool, take a look at GIBRLATAR - it works with NLog and log4net and also collects useful performance metrics. Most importantly, GIBRALTAR provides great tools for managing and analyzing logs.