Am trying to write a very simple select statement like below using Linq against Entity data model
trying to achieve
"Select * from SAPCostcentre where costcentermanager="mike";
Created my edmx and add a new class to write my DAO like below using linq but it doesn't like it.
public void ResourceCollection(string CostCenter)
{
string name = "Mike";
var context = new ScheduALLDAL.SAPCostCentre();
var query = from c in context.CostCentreManager where context.CostCentreManager = name select c;
var costcenter = query.ToList();
}
It throws exception "can not convert type string to bool here "context.CostCentreManager = name"
in my db design costcentermanger data type is varchar. Please some one throw me a light what am missing here or the right approach .
It should be == as you are making a Boolean evaluation. The rest of your code should be OK then :)
This is because you need to use a double equals sign (==). By using a single equals sign you are trying to assign context.CostCentreManager to "name".
It should be:
var query = from c in context.CostCentreManager
where context.CostCentreManager == name select c;
use == instead of =
var query = from c in context.CostCentreManager
where context.CostCentreManager == name
select c;
Related
How would you write "SELECT col.a, col.b FROM TABLE WHERE ID = 1" in LINQ to Entity 6 so that you could save col.a into variable A and col.b into variable B. You can do this with SqlReader by retrieving the index or column name, but with LINQ to Entity it is returned as one object. When returning a two field LINQ query to a list, both field are saved to the first index of the list and can only be accessed as the same list element. Is it standard to create two LINQ queries, one for each variable? Or am I missing part of the process?
Current query:
var result = (from col in cxt.Table
where col.ID == "1"
select new {col.a, col.b}).ToList();
If you are expecting exactly one record to return from database then what you can do:
var result = cxt.Table.FirstOrDefault(x => x.ID == "1");
//Notice that might be null if has not result
var a = result.a;
var b = result.b;
Will look very similar in query syntax but I think this method syntax neater in this case
I am not sure what exactly you are looking for. But selecting two variable by Linq is not so hard.
var value = (from ta in db.YourTable
where ta.ID = id
select new {
A = ta.a,
B = ta.b
}).FirstOrDefault();
var a = value.A;
var b = value.B;
If you use ToList() instead of FirstOrDefault(), you will get a list contain zero or more objects. You can simply use a loop to get field from each object.
forach(var value in values)
{
var a = value.A;
var b = value.B;
}
I have this simple query:
SELECT xObjectID, xObjectName
FROM dbo.xObject
where CONTAINS( xObjectRef, '1838 AND 238671')
Which i am trying to convert to linq but i can't get it to work,
And it's driving me up the wall.
Thanks!
Fulltext searches are not compatible with linq to sql. You will have to call a stored procedure.
Edit:
Or do you want a linq query that will return the same result set as the sql?
Does this work for you? This does require xObjectRef to be a property of xObject.
from obj in dbo.xObject
where obj.xObjectRef.Contains("1838") && obj.xObjectRef.Contains("238671")
select new { xObjectId = obj.xObjectId, xObjectName = obj.xObjectName}
var query = from c in context.xObject
where c.xObjectRef.Contains("1838") && c.xObjectRef.Contains("238671")
select new { ObjectID = c.xObjectID, ObjectName = c.xObjectName };
var a = xObject.where(n=>n.Contains("1838") && n.Contains("238671") )).
Select(s=>new {xObjectID=s.xObjectID , xObjectName=s.xObjectName});
I have linq query as follows:
var result = (from Customer cust in db select new { userNameList = cust.UserName }).ToList();
i want to loop through each value in the list<>
I tried to use the foreach to accomplish this. It is stupid i could not figure it out
I'm using something like this
foreach (List<string> item in result)
{
if (item.ToString() == userName)
{
userExistsFlag = 1;
}
}
But the .net compiler is just freaking out:
and giving me these errors
Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Collections.Generic.List' to 'System.Collections.Generic.List'
Cannot convert type 'AnonymousType#1' to 'System.Collections.Generic.List'
Thanks in anticipation
OF ALL THESE IMPLEMENTATIONS WHICH ONE IS MOST EFFICIENT AND CONSUMES LESS RESOURCES.
IT WOULD BE KIND ENOUGH IF SOME ONE CAN CLARIFY THIS FOR ME.
Shorter using Linq:
bool userExistsFlag = result.Any( x=> x.userNameList == userName);
As suggested in the other answers you do not need to project to an anonymous type:
var userNames = (from Customer cust in db select cust.UserName).ToList();
bool userExists = userNames.Contains(userName);
Edit:
The most efficient - if you do not need the set of user names otherwise - is to query the DB directly to check whether the user name exists, so
bool userExists = db.Any( x => x.UserName == userName);
Credit goes to #Chris Shaffer in the comments and #Cybernatet's answer - he was almost there. I would suggest you accept his answer but use Any() ;-)
Try:
var result = (from Customer cust in db select new { userNameList = cust.UserName }).ToList();
userExistsFlag = result.Where(a=> a.userNameList == userName).Count() > 0;
or
userExistsFlag = (
from Customer cust in db
where cust.UserName = userName
select cust
).Count() > 0;
If your query returns a list of names, your FOREACH loop should look like this
foreach( String name in results ){
...
}
Skip using new { userNameList = cust.UserName } which is making it an anonymous instance. You can try
var result = (from Customer cust in db select cust.UserName ).ToList();
if you're just getting the one property and want a list of strings there is no reason to use an anonymous type. code should work like this:
var result = (from Customer cust in db select cust.UserName).ToList();
When you query existing linq results, it's like they're stuck a layer deeper than the original result. Let me explain what I mean by this.
In the example below, after getting ResultSorted, to get to the data therein, you have to use RowSorted.All.TableData.Field, but in the unsorted Result, you could just do Row.TableData.Field. In the sorted data, you have to use .All to get to the rest of the data, which is like an extra layer to get to the data you're looking for.
How can I get it so I can query Result without getting this extra layer? Thanks Stack-O!
var Result =
from a in Db.Table
select new {TableData = a};
var ResultSorted =
from a in Result
orderby a.TableData.Field
select new {All = a};
foreach(var RowSorted in ResultSorted)
{
MessageBox.Show(RowSorted.All.TableData.ToString());
}
You can use
var Result =
from a in Db.Table
select a;
var ResultSorted =
from a in Result
orderby a.Field
select a;
foreach(var RowSorted in ResultSorted)
{
MessageBox.Show(RowSorted.ToString());
}
Edit:
The thing is that
select new {TableData = a};
creates a new anonymous type with a field called TableData, like this
class Tmp1
{
TableType TableData {get; set;}
}
and
select new {All = a};
creates a new anonymous type with a field called TableData, like this
class Tmp2
{
Tmp1 All {get; set;}
}
Edit 2:
If you select a directly you don't create the extra anonymous type, instead you return the TableType.
You are returning a new instance of an anonymous type in each of your LINQ queries:
select new {TableData = a};
select new {All = a};
What you are saying to the compiler is (in the first LINQ query), "Give me a new instance of an anoymous type. I want this anonymous type to have one property named TableData and I want the value for that property to be a."
If you simply return a instead of an anoymous type, you shouldn't need to go through the properties of the nested types to get the data. Try this:
var Result =
from a in Db.Table
select a;
var ResultSorted =
from a in Result
orderby a.TableData.Field
select a;
foreach(var RowSorted in ResultSorted)
{
MessageBox.Show(RowSorted.ToString());
}
var ResultSorted =
from a in Db.Table
orderby a.Field
select a.ToString();
Edit: Fixed, didn't see the first query. This should be identical now. There is no need to create anonymous objects all the time.
Consider this:
var query = from r in this._db.Recipes
where r.RecipesID == recipeID
select new { r.RecipesID, r.RecipesName };
How would i get individual columns in my query object without using a for-loop?
Basicly: how do I translate DataTable.Rows[0]["ColumnName"] into Linq syntax?
It's really unclear what you are looking for, as your two samples are compatible.
As close as I can figure, what you want is:
var rows = query.ToList();
string name = rows[0].RecipesName;
string name = this._db.Recipes.Single(r => r.RecipesID == recipeID).RecipesName;
This is the way to go about it:
DataContext dc = new DataContext();
var recipe = (from r in dc.Recipes
where r.RecipesID == 1
select r).FirstOrDefault();
if (recipe != null)
{
id = recipe.RecipesID;
name = recipe.RecipesName;
}
Sorry, misunderstood your question. As others are saying, you can use ToList() to get a List back. An alternative if all you need is the first one, just use:
query.First().ColumnName
or if you want to avoid an exception on empty list:
var obj = query.FirstOrDefault();
if (obj != null)
obj.ColumnName;
Original Answer (so the comment makes sense):
Use Linq to Datasets. Basically would be something like:
var query = from r in yourTable.AsEnumerable()
select r.Field<string>("ColumnName");