I have a problem with Automapper. I set up a test windows form application and below is the code. Also look at the comments after each MessageBox:
public class FirstClass
{
public string FirstProp { get; set; }
public IList<FirstClassChild> Children { get; set; }
}
public class FirstClassChild
{
public string FirstChildProp { get; set; }
}
public class SecondClass
{
public string FirstProp { get; set; }
public string SecondProp { get; set; }
public IList<SecondClassChild> Children { get; set; }
}
public class SecondClassChild
{
public string FirstChildProp { get; set; }
public string SecondChildProp { get; set; }
}
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
AutoMapper.Mapper.CreateMap<FirstClass, SecondClass>();
AutoMapper.Mapper.CreateMap<FirstClassChild, SecondClassChild>();
var f = new FirstClass { FirstProp = "FirstClass" };
f.Children = new List<FirstClassChild> { new FirstClassChild { FirstChildProp = "FirstClass" } };
var s = new SecondClass { FirstProp = "SecondClass", SecondProp = "SecondClass" };
s.Children = new List<SecondClassChild> { new SecondClassChild { FirstChildProp = "SecondClass", SecondChildProp = "SecondClass" } };
AutoMapper.Mapper.Map(f, s);
var fc = new FirstClassChild { FirstChildProp = "FirstClass" };
var sc = new SecondClassChild { FirstChildProp = "SecondClass", SecondChildProp = "SecondClass" };
AutoMapper.Mapper.Map(fc, sc);
MessageBox.Show(sc.FirstChildProp);//FirstClass as expected
MessageBox.Show(sc.SecondChildProp);//SecondClass as expected
MessageBox.Show(s.FirstProp);//FirstClass as expected
MessageBox.Show(s.SecondProp);//SecondClass as expected
MessageBox.Show(s.Children.First().FirstChildProp);//FirstClass as expected
MessageBox.Show(s.Children.First().SecondChildProp);//Empty not expected!!
}
}
What can I do to avoid this? Is this behavior expected?
Anyway can anyone guide me how make SecondClass childs SecondChildProp to remain "SecondClass" as it is before the mapping occurs.
I asked a similar question here and found another similar one here.
I think #PatrickSteele makes a very good point: how is AutoMapper supposed to map a source list to a dest list of existing objects, when the dest list may not necessarily bear any resemblance to the source list? i.e. "But what if one list has 3 and the other list has 5?"
If you are sure that FirstClass and SecondClass have the same number of Children, and if the FirstClass's Nth Child always corresponds to SecondClass's Nth child, you could try something like this:
Mapper.CreateMap<FirstClass, SecondClass>()
.ForMember(m => m.Children, o => o.Ignore())
.AfterMap((src, dest) =>
{
for (var i = 0; i < dest.Children.Count; i++)
Mapper.Map(src.Children[i], dest.Children[i]);
});
or if FirstChildProp is some kind of unique key:
Mapper.CreateMap<FirstClass, SecondClass>()
.ForMember(m => m.Children, o => o.Ignore())
.AfterMap((src, dest) =>
{
foreach (var dChild in dest.Children)
{
var sChild = src.Children.Single(c => c.FirstChildProp == dChild.FirstChildProp);
Mapper.Map(sChild, dChild);
}
});
Related
I need to populate a dropdown in my UI and hence added List object to the view model in my c# application. I am fetching the data in my controller code for the dropdown. What's the best way to assign data to the viewmodel object. Is linq an option?
I basically need to assign fundclasses to fundTrackRecord.FundClass
The main Viewmodel:
public class FundPerformanceVM
{
public FundPerformanceVM()
{
TrackRecord = new List<TrackRecordVM>();
}
public int FundId { get; set; }
public string FundName { get; set; }
public List<FundClassVM> FundClass { get; set; }
public string BenchmarkName1 { get; set; }
public string BenchmarkName2 { get; set; }
public List<TrackRecordVM> TrackRecord { get; set; }
public List<Tuple<string, string, string>> FundStatistics { get; set; }
}
public class FundClassVM
{
public int FundClassId { get; set; }
public string FundClass { get; set; }
}
Controller code:
var service = GetViewService<V_LEGAL_FUND_CLASS_SUMMARY>();
foreach (KeyValuePair<int, IEnumerable<FUND_PERFORMANCE>> entry in allPerformance)
{
var fundClasses = service.GetAll().Where(x => x.FUND_ID == entry.Key).Select(x => new { x.LEGAL_FUND_CLASS_ID, x.LEGAL_FUND_CLASS}).ToList();
var fundTrackRecord = new FundPerformanceVM();
fundTrackRecord.FundClass = ??;
If I understood correctly the structure of your model, you can try this:
fundTrackRecord.FundClass = fundClasses.Select(fc => new FundClassVM
{
FundClassId = fc.LEGAL_FUND_CLASS_ID,
FundClass = fc.LEGAL_FUND_CLASS
}).ToList();
You can also do this directly, replacing the code:
var fundClasses = service.GetAll().Where(x => x.FUND_ID == entry.Key).Select(x => new { x.LEGAL_FUND_CLASS_ID, x.LEGAL_FUND_CLASS}).ToList();
var fundTrackRecord = new FundPerformanceVM();
With:
var fundTrackRecord = new FundPerformanceVM();
fundTrackRecord.FundClass = service.GetAll().
Where(x => x.FUND_ID == entry.Key).
Select(fc => new FundClassVM
{
FundClassId = fc.LEGAL_FUND_CLASS_ID,
FundClass = fc.LEGAL_FUND_CLASS
}).ToList();
I have a question. It's about linq in combination with c#.
I want to create a tree structure from a flatten structure in a pre defined object structure.
The following code which I've got work, but both are not exactly what i want.
In linq:
var result = listAgenderingen.GroupBy(records => records.Agnnummer)
.Select(group => new { AgnNummer = group.Key, Items = group.ToList()}).ToList();
the issue is that this does not result in the object I want.
So I've rewritten this to the following code
List<string> test = listAgenderingen.Select(x => x.Agnnummer).Distinct().ToList();
foreach (var item in test)
{
List<Agendering> listAgendering = listAgenderingen.Where(agend => agend.Agnnummer == item).OrderBy(ord => ord.Agnnummer).ToList();
AgnAgendering AgnAgendering = new AgnAgendering() {AgnNummer =item, Agenderingen = listAgendering };
}
this code actually works correct. but for 200000 records, it's taking a lot of time while the original linq takes a few seconds.
my question is can the linq be rewritten so it will create or convert to the richt object?
the structure of the classes:
public class Agendering
{
public int AgnID { get; set; }
public string Agnnummer { get; set; }
}
public class AgnAgendering
{
public string AgnNummer { get; set; }
public List<Agendering> Agenderingen { get; set; }
}
I hope someone has a sollution.
If I understand correctly, you want:
var result = listAgenderingen.GroupBy(records => records.Agnnummer)
.Select(group => new AgnAgendering { AgnNummer = group.Key, Agenderingen = group.ToList()}).ToList();
Your properties naming makes it absolutely unreadable and unclear.
Assuming that you have a flat structure like:
public class Item
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public int? ParentID { get; set; }
}
and you want a tree-like structure:
public class TreeItem
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public TreeItem Parent { get; set; }
public List<TreeItem> Children { get; set; }
public TreeItem(int id)
{
ID = id;
Children = new List<TreeItem>();
}
public TreeItem(int id, TreeItem parent) : this(id)
{
Parent = parent;
}
}
You can do most optimally in O(n) using Dictionary:
Item[] items = ...;
Dictionary<int, TreeItem> result = new Dictionary<int, TreeItem>();
foreach (var item in items.OrderBy(x => x.ParentID ?? -1))
{
TreeItem current;
if (item.ParentID.HasValue)
{
TreeItem parent = result[item.ParentID]; // guaranteed to exist due to order
current = new TreeItem(item.ID, parent);
parent.Children.Add(current);
} else {
current = new TreeItem(item.ID);
}
}
TreeItem[] treeItems = result.Values.ToArray();
here is example on how to store cross-referenced entities in LiteDB. LiteDB stores the cross-referenced entities perfectly fine, but problem comes when I am trying to find/load entities back. My goal is NOT ONLY the requested entity but also referenced ones. There is quick tutorial section "DbRef for cross references" on LiteDB webpage how one can realize it. LiteDB has "Include" option (which is called before "FindAll") which says which referenced entities must be loaded as well. I am trying to achieve it in this code example but with no results, i.e, the code raises Exception("D_Ref") meaning "D_Ref" reference is not loaded:
namespace _01_simple {
using System;
using LiteDB;
public class A {
public int Id { set; get; }
public string Name { set; get; }
public B B_Ref { set; get; }
}
public class B {
public int Id { set; get; }
public string Name { set; get; }
public C C_Ref { set; get; }
}
public class C {
public int Id { set; get; }
public string Name { set; get; }
public D D_Ref { set; get; }
}
public class D {
public int Id { set; get; }
public string Name { set; get; }
}
class Program {
static void Main(string[] args) {
test_01();
}
static string NameInDb<T>() {
var name = typeof(T).Name + "s";
return name;
}
static void test_01() {
if (System.IO.File.Exists(#"MyData.db"))
System.IO.File.Delete(#"MyData.db");
using (var db = new LiteDatabase(#"MyData.db")) {
var As = db.GetCollection<A>(NameInDb<A>());
var Bs = db.GetCollection<B>(NameInDb<B>());
var Cs = db.GetCollection<C>(NameInDb<C>());
var Ds = db.GetCollection<D>(NameInDb<D>());
LiteDB.BsonMapper.Global.Entity<A>().DbRef(x => x.B_Ref, NameInDb<B>());
LiteDB.BsonMapper.Global.Entity<B>().DbRef(x => x.C_Ref, NameInDb<C>());
LiteDB.BsonMapper.Global.Entity<C>().DbRef(x => x.D_Ref, NameInDb<D>());
var d = new D { Name = "I am D." };
var c = new C { Name = "I am C.", D_Ref = d };
var b = new B { Name = "I am B.", C_Ref = c };
var a = new A { Name = "I am A.", B_Ref = b };
Ds.Insert(d);
Cs.Insert(c);
Bs.Insert(b);
As.Insert(a);
}
using (var db = new LiteDatabase(#"MyData.db")) {
var As = db.GetCollection<A>(NameInDb<A>());
var all_a = As
.Include(x => x.B_Ref)
.FindAll();
foreach (var a in all_a) {
if (a.B_Ref == null)
throw new Exception("B_Ref");
if (a.B_Ref.C_Ref == null)
throw new Exception("C_Ref");
if (a.B_Ref.C_Ref.D_Ref == null)
throw new Exception("D_Ref");
}
}
}
}}
after small research I've resolved the issue simply by adding extra "Include" parameterize by "x => x.B_Ref.C_Ref" lambda where x.B_Ref.C_Ref is a path in hierarchy of references:
var all_a = As
.Include(x => x.B_Ref)
.Include(x => x.B_Ref.C_Ref)
.FindAll();
Here is complete example
namespace _01_simple {
using System;
using LiteDB;
public class A {
public int Id { set; get; }
public string Name { set; get; }
public B B_Ref { set; get; }
}
public class B {
public int Id { set; get; }
public string Name { set; get; }
public C C_Ref { set; get; }
}
public class C {
public int Id { set; get; }
public string Name { set; get; }
public D D_Ref { set; get; }
}
public class D {
public int Id { set; get; }
public string Name { set; get; }
}
class Program {
static void Main(string[] args) {
test_01();
}
static string NameInDb<T>() {
var name = typeof(T).Name + "s";
return name;
}
static void test_01() {
if (System.IO.File.Exists(#"MyData.db"))
System.IO.File.Delete(#"MyData.db");
using (var db = new LiteDatabase(#"MyData.db")) {
var As = db.GetCollection<A>(NameInDb<A>());
var Bs = db.GetCollection<B>(NameInDb<B>());
var Cs = db.GetCollection<C>(NameInDb<C>());
var Ds = db.GetCollection<D>(NameInDb<D>());
LiteDB.BsonMapper.Global.Entity<A>().DbRef(x => x.B_Ref, NameInDb<B>());
LiteDB.BsonMapper.Global.Entity<B>().DbRef(x => x.C_Ref, NameInDb<C>());
LiteDB.BsonMapper.Global.Entity<C>().DbRef(x => x.D_Ref, NameInDb<D>());
var d = new D { Name = "I am D." };
var c = new C { Name = "I am C.", D_Ref = d };
var b = new B { Name = "I am B.", C_Ref = c };
var a = new A { Name = "I am A.", B_Ref = b };
Ds.Insert(d);
Cs.Insert(c);
Bs.Insert(b);
As.Insert(a);
}
using (var db = new LiteDatabase(#"MyData.db")) {
var As = db.GetCollection<A>(NameInDb<A>());
var all_a = As
.Include(x => x.B_Ref)
.Include(x => x.B_Ref.C_Ref)
.Include(x => x.B_Ref.C_Ref.D_Ref)
.FindAll();
foreach (var a in all_a) {
if (a.B_Ref == null)
throw new Exception("B_Ref");
if (a.B_Ref.C_Ref == null)
throw new Exception("C_Ref");
if (a.B_Ref.C_Ref.D_Ref == null)
throw new Exception("D_Ref");
}
}
}
}}
I hope it saves someone's time.
Update: LiteDB author says there is no support for Cascading Include. But it is planned in the next version (see issue). Consider, once, let say, B_Ref is a Lite of B, then there is no mechanism to force deeper Include.
I have two classes one of them is Destinations and the other one is DestinationDetails
public class Destinations
{
public Destinations() { }
public string CarrierName { get; set; }
public List<DestinationDetails> Details { get; set; }
}
public class DestinationDetails
{
public DestinationDetails() { }
public string Destination { get; set; }
public string Type { get; set; }
}
I want to get all string "Destination" in the second class from List of objects from the first class
I have List<Destinations> and I don't want to use for loop or foreach statments
var dest = new Destinations();
//Initialize the details
var destNames = dest.Details.Select(d => d.Destination).ToList();
Are you looking for something like this?
var det = new Destinations();
det.Details = new List<DestinationDetails>();
det.Details.Add(new DestinationDetails() { Destination = "CA" });
det.Details.Add(new DestinationDetails() { Destination = "NJ" });
...
...
var details = new DestinationDetails();
details.Destination = string.Join(",",det.Details.Select(x => x.Destination).ToArray() );
Update:-
provided list of Destinations "allDet", you can get the list of strings as below:-
alldet.Where(x => x.Details != null).SelectMany(x => x.Details.Select(y => y.Destination)).ToList() //With out ToList() it will give you IEnumerable<String>
List<Destinations> AirportDestinations ; // this list has Destinations objects which have Details which have Destination
So by using SelectMany
List<string> cities.AddRange(AirportDestinations.Where(x => x.Details != null).SelectMany(d => d.Details.Select(s => s.Destination)));
Now you have all Destination in all objects in the list
I hope it's more clear what I want to do from the code than the title. Basically I am grouping by 2 fields and want to reduce the results into a collection all the ProductKey's constructed in the Map phase.
public class BlockResult
{
public Client.Names ClientName;
public string Block;
public IEnumerable<ProductKey> ProductKeys;
}
public Block()
{
Map = products =>
from product in products
where product.Details.Block != null
select new
{
product.ClientName,
product.Details.Block,
ProductKeys = new List<ProductKey>(new ProductKey[]{
new ProductKey{
Id = product.Id,
Url = product.Url
}
})
};
Reduce = results =>
from result in results
group result by new {result.ClientName, result.Block} into g
select new BlockResult
{
ClientName = g.Key.ClientName,
Block = g.Key.Block,
ProductKeys = g.SelectMany(x=> x.ProductKeys)
};
}
I get some weird System.InvalidOperationException and a source code dump where basically it is trying to initialize the list with an int (?).
If I try replacing the ProductKey with just IEnumerable ProductIds (and make appropriate changes in the code). Then the code runs but I don't get any results in the reduce.
You probably don't want to do this. Are you really going to need to query in this manner? If you know the context, then you should probably just do this:
var q = session.Query<Product>()
.Where(x => x.ClientName == "Joe" && x.Details.Block == "A");
But, to answer your original question, the following index will work:
public class Products_GroupedByClientNameAndBlock : AbstractIndexCreationTask<Product, Products_GroupedByClientNameAndBlock.Result>
{
public class Result
{
public string ClientName { get; set; }
public string Block { get; set; }
public IList<ProductKey> ProductKeys { get; set; }
}
public class ProductKey
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public string Url { get; set; }
}
public Products_GroupedByClientNameAndBlock()
{
Map = products =>
from product in products
where product.Details.Block != null
select new {
product.ClientName,
product.Details.Block,
ProductKeys = new[] { new { product.Id, product.Url } }
};
Reduce = results =>
from result in results
group result by new { result.ClientName, result.Block }
into g
select new {
g.Key.ClientName,
g.Key.Block,
ProductKeys = g.SelectMany(x => x.ProductKeys)
};
}
}
When replicating I get the same InvalidOperationException, stating that it doesn't understand the index definition (stack trace omitted for brevity).
Url: "/indexes/Keys/ByNameAndBlock"
System.InvalidOperationException: Could not understand query:
I'm still not entirely sure what you're attempting here, so this may not be quite what you're after, but I managed to get the following working. In short, Map/Reduce deals in anonymous objects, so strongly typing to your custom types makes no sense to Raven.
public class Keys_ByNameAndBlock : AbstractIndexCreationTask<Product, BlockResult>
{
public Keys_ByNameAndBlock()
{
Map = products =>
from product in products
where product.Block != null
select new
{
product.Name,
product.Block,
ProductIds = product.ProductKeys.Select(x => x.Id)
};
Reduce = results =>
from result in results
group result by new {result.Name, result.Block}
into g
select new
{
g.Key.Name,
g.Key.Block,
ProductIds = g.SelectMany(x => x.ProductIds)
};
}
}
public class Product
{
public Product()
{
ProductKeys = new List<ProductKey>();
}
public int ProductId { get; set; }
public string Url { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Block { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<ProductKey> ProductKeys { get; set; }
}
public class ProductKey
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Url { get; set; }
}
public class BlockResult
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Block { get; set; }
public int[] ProductIds { get; set; }
}