Multiple Select and Join with LINQ and Lambda - c#

How can I do this query using LINQ and LAMBDA ?
QUERY
Select san_negocio.imovel_id
,san_negocio.negocio_id
,san_imovel.credenciada_id
,san_proposta.proposta_id
,san_proposta.credenciada_id
from san_negocio
join san_proposta
on san_negocio.imovel_id = san_proposta.imovel_id
join san_imovel
on san_negocio.imovel_id = san_imovel.imovel_id
where san_negocio.credenciadacaptadora_id is null
and san_negocio.credenciadavendedora_id is null
and san_proposta.statusproposta_id = 2
I've tried:
var objetos = db.San_Negocio.Join(db.San_Proposta, a => a.Imovel_Id, b => b.Imovel_Id, (a, b) => new { San_Negocio = a, San_Proposta = b })
.Join(db.San_Imovel, a => a.San_Negocio.Imovel_Id, c => c.Imovel_Id, (a, c) => new { San_Negocio = a, San_Imovel = c })
.Where(a => a.San_Negocio.San_Negocio.CredenciadaCaptadora_Id == null && a.San_Negocio.San_Negocio.CredenciadaVendedora_Id == null)
.Select(a => new { a.San_Negocio.San_Negocio.Negocio_Id,
a.San_Negocio.San_Negocio.Imovel_Id,
a.San_Imovel.Credenciada_Id });
My doubt is in my Select. How can I call my San_Proposta table ?

You are hiding San_Proposta within a field called San_Negocio, so calling a.San_Negocio.San_Proposta will access it, but I recommend writing your joins in a way that fields aren't nested, like this:
var objetos = db.San_Negocio
.Join(db.San_Proposta,
a => a.Imovel_Id,
b => b.Imovel_Id,
(a, b) => new { San_Negocio = a, San_Proposta = b })
.Join(db.San_Imovel,
a => a.San_Negocio.Imovel_Id,
c => c.Imovel_Id,
(a, c) => new { a.San_Negocio, a.San_Proposta, San_Imovel = c })
.Where(a => a.San_Negocio.CredenciadaCaptadora_Id == null &&
a.San_Negocio.CredenciadaVendedora_Id == null)
.Select(a => new
{
a.San_Negocio.Negocio_Id,
a.San_Negocio.Imovel_Id,
a.San_Proposta.San_Proposta_Id,
a.San_Imovel.Credenciada_Id
});

Here is a proper linq statement:
from neg in db.san_negocio
join prop in san_proposta
on neg.imovel.id equals prop.imovel_id
join imo in san_imovel
on neg.imovel_id = imo.imovel_id
where neg.credenciadacaptadora_id == null &&
neg.credenciadavendedora_id == null &&
prop.statusproposta_id == 2
select new {
ImovelID = neg.imovel_id,
NegocioID = neg.negocio_id,
Imo_CredenciadaID = imo.credenciada_id,
PropostaID = prop.proposta_id
Prop_CredenciadaID = prop.credenciada_id
};
This will create an IQueryable of anonymous objects with the listed properties above.

Related

C# Linq compress join query with where clause

Hi I am using below code to fetch required data from 2 tables using linq syntax which is working fine.
var ratings = from r in _ratingRepository.AsQueryable()
join c in _convRepository.AsQueryable()
on r.SessionId equals c.CurrentConversationSid
where!c.IsDeleted && c.DateCreated >= request.From && c.DateCreated <=
request.To && c.HasRated
select new Rating() {
Id = r.Id,
SessionId = r.SessionId,
Questions = r.Questions,
AvgRatingValue = r.AvgRatingValue
};
I want to transform this code using below syntax
IQueryable<Rating> ratingsObj = _ratingRepository.AsQueryable()
.Join(_convRepository.AsQueryable().Where(a => a.HasRated), r => r.SessionId, c => c.CurrentConversationSid, (r, c) =>
new Rating()
{
Id = r.Id,
SessionId = r.SessionId,
Questions = r.Questions,
AvgRatingValue = r.AvgRatingValue
});
Its gives below error
System.ArgumentException: 'Expression of type
'System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable1[Flecx.Chat.Entities.Conversation]' cannot be used for parameter of type 'System.Linq.IQueryable1[Flecx.Chat.Entities.Conversation]' of method
'System.Linq.IQueryable1[Flecx.Chat.Entities.Conversation] Where[Conversation](System.Linq.IQueryable1[Flecx.Chat.Entities.Conversation],
System.Linq.Expressions.Expression1[System.Func2[Flecx.Chat.Entities.Conversation,System.Boolean]])'
(Parameter 'arg0')'
If I remove this code .Where(a => a.HasRated) it runs fine. How can I include the where clause in above syntax.
Need help
try this:
var ratingsObj = _ratingRepository.AsQueryable()
.Join(_convRepository.AsQueryable(),
r => r.SessionId,
c => c.CurrentConversationSid,
(r,c)=>new {r,c}) //**
.Where(a => a.c.HasRated)
.Select(x => new Rating()
{
Id = x.r.Id,
SessionId = x.r.SessionId,
Questions = x.r.Questions,
AvgRatingValue = x.r.AvgRatingValue
});
you can filter anything you want in line with '//**' same below:
(r, c) => new
{ r.Id,
r.SessionId,
r.Questions,
r.AvgRatingValue,
c.HasRated
}
then your code is changed to this:
var ratingsObj = _ratingRepository.AsQueryable()
.Join(_convRepository.AsQueryable(),
r => r.SessionId,
c => c.CurrentConversationSid,
(r, c) => new
{ r.Id,
r.SessionId,
r.Questions,
r.AvgRatingValue,
c.HasRated})
.Where(a => a.HasRated)
.Select(x => new Rating()
{
Id = x.Id,
SessionId = x.SessionId,
Questions = x.Questions,
AvgRatingValue = x.AvgRatingValue
});

DefaultIfEmpty() does not handle empty collections

I've been trying to left join the table and they are in a one-to-many relationship.
I have written a SQL query and trying to convert it into LINQ for my ASP.NET Core application.
My sql query is as follows:
SELECT ap.SystemId,
ap.AccessRequiredToId,
cb.AccessAreaManagementId,
ap.EquipmentTagId,
COUNT(ap.Name) [Count]
FROM ApplicationForms ap LEFT JOIN AccessAreaCheckBoxes cb
ON n ap.RecordId = cb.RecordId
WHERE EndDate IS NULL AND (Checked IS NULL OR Checked = 1)
GROUP BY ap.SystemId, ap.AccessRequiredToId, cb.AccessAreaManagementId, ap.EquipmentTagId
SQL Result
And my LINQ is as follows:
var active = _context.ApplicationForms
.Where(w => w.EndDate == null)
.GroupJoin(_context.AccessAreaCheckBoxes
.Where(w => (w.AccessAreaManagement == null || w.Checked == true)),
x => x.RecordId,
y => y.RecordId,
(x, y) => new { ApplicationForms = x, AccessAreaCheckBoxes = y })
.SelectMany(x => x.AccessAreaCheckBoxes.DefaultIfEmpty(),
(x, y) => new { x.ApplicationForms, AccessAreaCheckBoxes = y })
.GroupBy(g => new { g.ApplicationForms.System, g.ApplicationForms.AccessRequiredTo, g.AccessAreaCheckBoxes.AccessAreaManagement, g.ApplicationForms.EquipmentTag })
.Select(s => new RecordViewModel
{
System = s.Key.System.Name,
AccessRequiredTo = s.Key.AccessRequiredTo.Name,
AccessArea = s.Key.AccessAreaManagement.Name,
EquipmentTag = s.Key.EquipmentTag.Name,
Count = s.Count()
}).ToList();
Everything is working well except it doesn't show the rows with the NULL value.
Did I miss out something in my LINQ?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
This is what I do in the end, post here for your reference.
var active = (from ap in _context.ApplicationForms
join cb in _context.AccessAreaCheckBoxes
on ap.RecordId equals cb.RecordId into j1
from j2 in j1.DefaultIfEmpty()
where ap.EndDate == null
&& (j2.AccessAreaManagement == null || j2.Checked == true)
group new { ap.System, ap.AccessRequiredTo, j2.AccessAreaManagement, ap.EquipmentTag }
by new { System = ap.System.Name, Building = ap.AccessRequiredTo.Name, AccessArea = j2.AccessAreaManagement.Name, Equipment = ap.EquipmentTag.Name } into grp
select new RecordViewModel
{
System = grp.Key.System,
AccessRequiredTo = grp.Key.Building,
AccessArea = grp.Key.AccessArea,
EquipmentTag = grp.Key.Equipment,
Count = grp.Count()
}).ToList();

Add condition to join linq to object c#

I would like to add a condition to the below query based on another property
eg"and a.City=b.City" .How would I do it .
Currenty query
var result = firstCollection.Join(secondCollection,
a => a.CustomerId,
b => b.CustomerId, //TO ADD "and a.City=b.City"
GetDifferences)
.SelectMany(x => x)
.Where(x => x != null).ToList();
In sql I would do:
Select * from firstCollection a
INNER JOIN secondCollection B on a.CustomerId=b.CustomerId and a.city=b.city
many thanks for your suggestions
Use anonymous types:
var result = firstCollection.Join(secondCollection,
a => new { a.CustomerId, a.City }
b => new { b.CustomerId, b.City },
GetDifferences)
.SelectMany(x => x)
.Where(x => x != null).ToList();

linq after groupby unable to get column values

I am getting data from multiple tables by joining and i want to group data on particular column value but after group by statement i can access my aliases and their properties. What mistake i am making?
public List<PatientHistory> GetPatientHistory(long prid)
{
using(var db = new bc_limsEntities())
{
List<PatientHistory> result =
(from r in db.dc_tresult
join t in db.dc_tp_test on r.testid equals t.TestId into x
from t in x.DefaultIfEmpty()
join a in db.dc_tp_attributes on r.attributeid equals a.AttributeId into y
from a in y.DefaultIfEmpty()
where r.prid == prid
group new {r,t,a} by new {r.testid} into g
select new PatientHistory
{
resultid = r.resultid,
bookingid = r.bookingid,
testid = r.testid,
prid = r.prid,
attributeid = r.attributeid,
result = r.result,
Test_Name = t.Test_Name,
Attribute_Name = a.Attribute_Name,
enteredon = r.enteredon,
Attribute_Type = a.Attribute_Type
}).ToList();
return result;
}
}
You're doing this wrong way. As been said by Jon after grouping the sequences with aliases r,t,a doesn't exist. After grouping you receive the sequence g with sequances of r,t,a in each element of g. If you want get one object from each group (for example most recent) you should try this:
List<PatientHistory> result =
(from r in db.dc_tresult
join t in db.dc_tp_test on r.testid equals t.TestId into x
from t in x.DefaultIfEmpty()
join a in db.dc_tp_attributes on r.attributeid equals a.AttributeId into y
from a in y.DefaultIfEmpty()
where r.prid == prid
group new {r,t,a} by new {r.testid} into g
select new PatientHistory
{
resultid = g.Select(x => x.r.resultid).Last(), // if you expect single value get it with Single()
// .... here add the rest properties
Attribute_Type = g.Select(x => x.a.Attribute_Type).Last()
}).ToList();
I appreciated this question so I thought I would add another potential usage case. I would like feedback on what the cleanest approach is to getting table information through a group operation so that I can project later in the select operation. I ended up combining what the OP did which is to pass objects into his group clause and then used the g.Select approach suggested by YD1m to get table information out later. I have a LEFT JOIN so I'm defending against nulls :
// SQL Query
//DECLARE #idCamp as Integer = 1
//
//select *,
//(select
//count(idActivityMaster)
//FROM tbActivityMasters
//WHERE dftidActivityCategory = A.idActivityCategory) as masterCount
//FROM tbactivitycategories A
//WHERE idcamp = #idCamp
//ORDER BY CategoryName
int idCamp = 1;
var desiredResult =
(from c in tbActivityCategories
.Where(w => w.idCamp == idCamp)
from m in tbActivityMasters
.Where(m => m.dftidActivityCategory == c.idActivityCategory)
.DefaultIfEmpty() // LEFT OUTER JOIN
where c.idCamp == idCamp
group new {c, m} by new { m.dftidActivityCategory } into g
select new
{
idActivityCategory = g.Select(x => x.m == null ? 0 : x.m.dftidActivityCategory).First(),
idCamp = g.Select(x => x.c.idCamp).First(),
CategoryName = g.Select(x => x.c.CategoryName).First(),
CategoryDescription = g.Select(x => x.c.CategoryDescription).First(),
masterCount = g.Count(x => x.m != null)
}).OrderBy(o=> o.idActivityCategory);
desiredResult.Dump("desiredResult");
If I just use a basic group approach I get the results but not the extra column information. At least I can't find it once I group.
var simpleGroup = (from c in tbActivityCategories
.Where(w => w.idCamp == idCamp)
.OrderBy(o => o.CategoryName)
from m in tbActivityMasters
.Where(m => m.dftidActivityCategory == c.idActivityCategory)
.DefaultIfEmpty() // LEFT OUTER JOIN
where c.idCamp == idCamp
group m by m == null ? 0 : m.dftidActivityCategory into g
select new
{
// How do I best get the extra desired column information from other tables that I had before grouping
// but still have the benefit of the grouping?
// idActivityCategory = g.Select(x => x.m == null ? 0 : x.m.dftidActivityCategory).First(),
// idCamp = g.Select(x => x.c.idCamp).First(),
// CategoryName = g.Select(x => x.c.CategoryName).First(),
// CategoryDescription = g.Select(x => x.c.CategoryDescription).First(),
// masterCount = g.Count(x => x.m != null)
idActivityCategory = g.Key,
masterCount = g.Count(x => x != null)
});
simpleGroup.Dump("simpleGroup");
Please tear this up. I'm trying to learn and it just seems like I'm missing the big picture here. Thanks.
UPDATE : Cleaned up by moving the work into the group and making the select more straight forward. If I had known this yesterday then this would have been my original answer to the OP question.
int idCamp = 1;
var desiredResult =
(from c in tbActivityCategories
.Where(w => w.idCamp == idCamp)
from m in tbActivityMasters
.Where(m => m.dftidActivityCategory == c.idActivityCategory)
.DefaultIfEmpty() // LEFT OUTER JOIN
where c.idCamp == idCamp
group new { c, m } by new
{ idActivityCategory = m == null ? 0 : m.dftidActivityCategory,
idCamp = c.idCamp,
CateGoryName = c.CategoryName,
CategoryDescription = c.CategoryDescription
} into g
select new
{
idActivityCategory = g.Key.idActivityCategory,
idCamp = g.Key.idCamp,
CategoryName = g.Key.CateGoryName,
CategoryDescription = g.Key.CategoryDescription,
masterCount = g.Count(x => x.m != null)
}).OrderBy(o => o.idActivityCategory);
desiredResult.Dump("desiredResult");

How to use LINQ with calculated properties in a single pass?

I'd like to make a LINQ query, extracting dynamic properties (calculated fields) of my entities in a single pass, without get the error "The specified type member 'EntityKey' is not supported in LINQ to Entities".
Here is the only working way I found, but I am sure there are better and more elegant methods:
var q = (from i in
(from x in context.Tickets
select new { x.OperatoreID, x.DataObiettivo })
group i by new { i.OperatoreID } into g
select new vmOperatoreDateObiettivo
{
OperatoreID = g.Key.OperatoreID,
NOperatore = "", // field value to be updated...
DataObiettivo = g.Max(d => d.DataObiettivo),
MinutiAllaScadenza = 0, // field to be updated...
Alert = "" // field value to be updated...
}).ToList();
// Here I update my fields with a second pass....
foreach (vmOperatoreDateObiettivo e in q)
{
string nome = context.Operatori
.Where(t => t.OperatoreID == e.OperatoreID)
.First().CognomeNomePuntato.ToString();
e.NOperatore = nome;
int minscad = context.Tickets
.Where(t => t.OperatoreID == e.OperatoreID).AsEnumerable().Min(a => a.MinutiAllaScadenza);
e.MinutiAllaScadenza = minscad;
string sev = context.Tickets
.Where(t => t.OperatoreID == e.OperatoreID).AsEnumerable().Min(a => a.Alert);
e.Alert = sev;
}
Thanks in advance!
Try adding a let clause to your query and define calculated field, like so:
var q = (from i in
(from x in context.Tickets
select new { x.OperatoreID, x.DataObiettivo })
group i by new { i.OperatoreID } into g
let nOperatore = context.Operatori
.Where(t => t.OperatoreID == e.OperatoreID)
.First().CognomeNomePuntato.ToString() &&
minutialla = context.Tickets
.Where(t => t.OperatoreID == e.OperatoreID)
.AsEnumerable().Min(a => a.MinutiAllaScadenza) &&
alert = context.Tickets
.Where(t => t.OperatoreID == e.OperatoreID)
.AsEnumerable().Min(a => a.Alert)
select new vmOperatoreDateObiettivo
{
OperatoreID = g.Key.OperatoreID,
NOperatore = nOperatore,
DataObiettivo = g.Max(d => d.DataObiettivo),
MinutiAllaScadenza = minutialla,
Alert = alert
}).ToList();

Categories

Resources