I have made a complex solution using EF5 (Lets call it EF5), this solution works perfectly fine and has a Logic.cs file,lies at the app_code, which has multiple functions that access , control and modify this solution, So far so good.
I would like that my business' clients to access these function and I'd like to expose these functions by using WCF.
The steps I did are the following.
Adding WCF project to the solution where the EF5 project is.
Writing "OperationContract"s for each of the functions I'd like to expose to my client.
Try implementing each of the functions by calling the EF5 functions.
The problem lies at the implementation, VS fails to recognize the logic.cs file , and therefore I cannot call the functions and expose my EF5 project to my clients.
I am new with WCF, obviously I'm doing something wrong here.
My question is, how do I expose EF5 project's functions, that lies in a .cs class , to WCF?
I believe that the major mistake that I made was that I didn't make a WCF project and added EF5 item to it, but I'm not entirely sure.
Here are the screenshots that displays my steps to add the EF5 Reference to the WCF project.
Thanks
You need to add a reference to your EF5 project from your WCF project.
You also need to make sure all your function to be called in Logic.cs are public.
Also make sure you are 'using' the namespace in which those functions are declared.
Related
Ok so I have built my WCF service and its functioning great! However, I am starting to implement it into our pre-existing piece of software now and I am instantly running into the question, do I only use the proxy generated code and get rid of the dll that I used initially? Or do I keep both, and make distinctions between the two very obvious?
What I mean by keeping distinctions is, having a ServerUser and a LocalUser property that represent the same user object. However, my LocalUser property would be filled via the dll that the app initally ran with, if the application service is unavailable.
My main reasoning for this thought pattern is that if I remove my dll, I have a single point of failure. If for some reason my ServiceHost is just not up and running, but the DB server is, I would want my users to still be able to do their job. The features that the new WCF implementation utilize are not dependant for employees to do their job. It is more of a convenience in what the WCF service provides. Also, building in this kind of logic to the Service would allow service modifications more readily available in a non IIS hosted environment.
Also, is there a way to build in logic on the service so that when I pull down the proxy code for the client that it just knows to access the DB manually if the ServiceHost is unavailable? If this was a possibility, I think about 90% of all my problems would disappear.
Thank you in advance!
From what you describe it sounds like keeping your existing DLL, i.e. direct access to the DB, would best suit your needs. Having a WCF service adds nothing if, when it fails, you'll just use the DLL anyway.
Ideally you would go with the WCF service completly and offer some kind of redundency to deal with any potenial service issues. Plus, using a service will mean you won't have to deal with any DLL upgrades/deployments.
But, from your question, it sounds like there would be some real issues to deal with should the service not be available, so just do with the DLL.
EDIT: Just read the last part of your question and I don't think that is possible. The proxy code for accessing services is generated when you add the reference to your project. The kind of "dynamic" information you're after would actually require a service.
EDIT: As a follow up to my comment below you could test this by creating a DLL and class, lets call it Class1. Then create a WCF service with a method that will return Class1. Create a client application and add a reference to the service. If you look at the proxy-generated code you should see (hopefully...I'm thinking of this as I type :)) that the method returns Class1, but when you compile it won't be able to find Class1. This is because Class1 does not have the DataContractAttribute which would auto-generate Class1 on the client. So, you have to distribute the shared DLL to the client. Now when the method returns and WCF tries to re-create Class1 it will use the local version in the shared DLL. Your other DLL, which will already be on the client, would use the same shared DLL.
Consider the following Visual Studio project structure
ProjectA.csproj
AClass.cs
ProjectB.csproj
References
ProjectA
Web References
AWebService
AWebService.csproj
References
ProjectA
ReturnAClassViaWebService.asmx
The issue occurs when ProjectB adds the web reference to AWebService and automatically generates all the proxy code for accessing AWebService including a new implementation of AClass. Since all of our other code needs to use the AClass defined in ProjectA, we're forced to convert the AWebService.AClass returned from the service into something we can use.
We're currently considering two solutions, neither of which are ideal.
Manually editing the generated Reference.cs to remove new definitions of AClass
Serializing AWebService.AClass to a stream then deserializing to ProjectA.AClass
Does anyone have any better solutions? This seems like something common enough for other developers to have experienced it.
Ideally we would like to have the proxy code generated in ProjectB to reference ProjectA.AClass rather than generating a whole new implementation.
Our environment is VS 2008 using .NET 2.0.
I have had the same problem that you are describing and I have tried both of the options you specify without being entirely happy about either of them.
The reason we both have this issue is at least partly because the shared-library-between-consumer-and-provider-of-a-web-service-solution is in violation of accepted patterns and practices for web service design. On the consumer side, it should be sufficient to know the interface published in the WSDL.
Still, if you are prepared to accept a tight coupling between your web service provider and web service consumer and you know for certain that your current client will never be replaced by a different client (which might not be capable of referencing the shared library), then I understand why the proposed solution seems like a neat way to structure your app. IMPORTANT NOTE: Can we really honestly answer yes to both of these questions? Probably not.
To recap:
The issue appears when you have classes (e.g. a strongly typed dataset) defined in some sort of shared library (used on both client and server).
Some of your shared classes are used in the interface defined by your web service.
When the web reference is added there are proxy classes defined (for your shared classes) within the web reference namespace.
Due to the different namespaces the proxy class and its actual counterpart in the shared library are incompatible.
Here are four solutions that can be tried if you want to go ahead with the shared library setup:
Don't. Use the proxy class on the client side. This is how it is intendend to be done. It works fine unless you simultaneously want to leverage aspects of the shared library that are not exposed by the web service WSDL.
Implement or use a provided copy/duplication feature of the class (e.g. you could try to Merge() one strongly typed dataset into another). A Cast is obviosuly not possible, and the copy option is usually not a very good solution either since it tends to have undesirable side-effects. E.g. When you Merge a dataset into another, all the rows in the target dataset will be labeled as 'changed'. This could be resurrected with AcceptChanges(), but what if a couple of the received rows were actually changed.
Serialize everything - except for elementary data types - into strings (and back again on the consumer side). Loss of type safety is one important weakness of this approach.
Remove the explicit declaration of the shared class in Reference.cs and strip the namespace from the shared class wherever it is mentioned within Reference.cs. This is probably the best option. You get what you really wanted. The shared class is returned by the web service. The only irritating drawback with this solution is that your modifications to the reference.cs file is lost whenever you update your web reference. Trust me: It can be seriously annoying.
Here is a link to a similar discussion:
You can reuse existing referenced types between the client and service by clicking on the 'Advanced' button on the 'Add Service Reference' form. Make sure the 'Reuse types in referenced assemblies' checkbox is checked and when the service client is generated it should reuse all types from project A.
In past versions this has not always worked correctly and I've had to explicitly select the shared type assemblies by selecting the 'Reuse types in specified referenced assemblies' option and then checking the appropriate assemblies in the list box. However, I just tested this with VS 2008 SP1 and it appears to work as expected. Obviously, you need to make sure that the types that are being used by the service and client projects are both from project A.
Hope that this helps.
We encountered a similar problem with one of our projects. Because we had several dependencies, we ended up creating a circular reference because project 1 required objects from project 2, but project 2 could not be build before project 3, which relied on project 1 to be build.
To solve this problem, we extracted all the public standalone classes from both projects and placed them inside a single librarie. In the end we created something like this:
Framework.Objects
Framework.Interface
Framework.Implementation
WebService
The WebService would be linked to all projects in our case, whereas external parties would only be linking to the objects and interface classes to work with. The actuall implementation was coupled at runtime through reflection.
Hope this helps
I have a Silverlight Class Library that I want to use in both my Silverlight and my WebService project.
I am able to create and reference the Library in both projects without any problems, but when I try to use any of the classes in the Library on the Silerlight project, I get an ambiguous reference error between my Library and the Asmx Webservice (apparently, the silverlight project believes that the classes in the class library exist in the webservice).
How can I correct this issue? I have tried rebuilding and cleaning, but it does not seem to work. Can anyone help?
Sounds like the objects you are passing to Silverlight, via the WCF service, are the same objects in your class library. In that case the generated web-reference objects will be given the same names. Linking with the library will then give you 2 sets of objects with the same names.
If you install RIA services, once feature is the ability to share code between client and server by simply adding ".shared" in the class filenames before the extensions. ASMX services are so last century :)
if you don't want to learn the RIA services way of sharing objects across the great-web-divide (which I would recommend), you need to separate the data objects from the functionality you actually want to share client and server side.
To give more specific advice on your current set-up I would need to see more about how it is structured.
A technique you can use is aliasing your using statements:
using MyNameSpace = My.Name.Space;
using MyWebService = My.Web.Service;
Then access all of your objects with these aliases to remove the ambiguities.
I have a webservice with a function that returns a type (foo). If I consume this webservice in .NET through the 2.0 generated proxies, it creates a class called foo in the generated proxy. If I have the DLL that contains that class (foo) that is the DLL being used by the webservice, is there any way to have it use that class instead of creating a custom proxy class? I'm looking for something similar to what remoting does... but not remoting.
I've seen 3 ways of doing this:
Let Visual Studio generate the proxy and then change the classes in the proxy to the full class names of the dll, by hand. Works, but you would have to do this again everytime you update your proxy. Plus it's really dirty, isn't it?
Use a generic class/method that
creates deep copies of your proxy
objects into the "real" objects by
reflection. Works, but of course
with a little performance offtrade
Use WCF, where you can reference the
dll with the data contracts (your
data classes) and use them instead
of creating any proxy by code
generation.
I think the key issue here is in generating the proxies. I've generally used two different approaches to web services:
1) Traditional services, where you expose methods and a client generates the proxy in Visual Studio to consume the methods.
2) Request/Response services, where the exposed "service" is more of a pass-through and the "actions" being performed are encapsulated in the objects being sent to and received from the service. These actions would be in that shared library that both the server and the client have.
In the former I often run into this same problem and I don't really think there's a solution, at least not one that Visual Studio is going to like at all. You could perhaps manually modify the generated proxies to use the other classes, but then you'll have to repeat that step any time you re-generate. Conversely, you can generate outside of Visual Studio in something like CodeSmith (the older version is free, but depends on .NET 1.1), which will require some work to create a template for the proxies and to step outside the IDE to re-generate any time you need to update them.
I can recommend a good tool for the latter, however, and that would be the Agatha project. It takes the approach of separating the "service" from the "actions" that are being performed, and makes the approach of the shared library very easy. Such a re-architecture may very well be out of the question for the project you're working on depending on your schedule, but it's definitely something to explore for future projects.
You could write your own proxy class, or you could implement a constructor on your Foo class that takes an instance of the generated Foo class and copies over the data as appropriate.
I am writing a Large Scale Silverlight Application.
I am currently writing the data retrieval elements.
I have now encoutered and issue.
I have a common Project that hold objects, this project is referenced by both the UI and the WCF service.
The UI requires INotifyPropertyChanged for binding purposes.
Now the WCF must use the same objects, but I am getting a compiler error saying
"The type
'System.ComponentModel.INotifyPropertyChanged'
is defined in an assembly that is not
referenced."
EDIT: The error is in the WCF service.
I want one object class, how do I solve this problem?
diagram http://www.pcbuyersguide.co.za/picture.php?albumid=19&pictureid=1708
Thanks
-Oliver
If you plan to use the same source code for your Entities (domain) for both a clr and silverlight project you will need to use 2 projects because the Silverlight assemblies are not the same as CLR assemblies.
Add a Silverlight Class Library project to your solution, the name is not important but I usually just use XXXX_SL.
Now, you will 'Add Existing Item' all of the source files from the clr project, but notice the dropdown on the open or select button? click that and 'add as link' or whatever it says there.
You are now using the same source for both projects and your solution will compile.
There may be some minor tweaks along the way but that will set you on the right path..
Here is some reference material
did you add a reference in the compiling project to System.ComponentModel
I found a method here that allows one to create the CLR classes on the service side and then one can use the generated objects from the Service Reference as the classes are generated with the INotifyPropertyChanged and ObservableCollection.
This solves the immediate problem of the client/server boundary but does fit into my solution because in order to use the generated objects you need the service reference. But I have a ProxyClass that does the talking to WCF so there I cannot see a way of passing these object types back to the ViewModel.
I see some people have written mapper classes, but this is far from ideal as I would have to write 3 classes for each POCO object (client class, server DTO class, mapper).
Any more suggestions?