I am currently trying to create a new order (which will be shown below) in a web service, and then send that data to insert a new row into the database. For some reason my DBML / Data Context does not allow me to use InsertOnSubmit.
Any ideas? I haven't used Linq to Sql in about 7 months.
Thanks in advance.
[WebMethod]
public string InsertOrderToDatabases()
{
//Start Data Contexts ------
DataContext db = new DataContext(System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["RainbowCMSConnectionString"]);
DataContext dcSqlOES = new DataContext(System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["OESConnectionString"]);
//Get table from local database
Table<Schedule> Schedule = db.GetTable<Schedule>();
//Find last order number in databases
var lastOrderNumber = from lOrder in Schedule
orderby lOrder.templ_idn descending
select lOrder.templ_idn;
int firstOrderID;
var firstOrder = lastOrderNumber.FirstOrDefault();
firstOrderID = firstOrder.Value + 1;
qrOrder qrOrd = new qrOrder
{
.... data in here creating a new order
};
//TODO: fix below with an insert on submit
if (qrOrd != null)
{
// **Schedule.InsertOnSubmit(qrOrd);**
}
//db.GetTable<Schedule>().InsertOnSubmit(qrOrd);
try
{
//Submit the changes to the database
db.SubmitChanges();
return "Orders were sent to the databases.";
}
catch ()
{
}
}
Based on your response, it appears that you are using the wrong table, or perhaps the wrong data type. I also noticed that when you declare your localSchedule variable, you declare it as type Table<Schedule>, which means it should contain Schedule entities, not qrOrder entities.
Table<TEntity>.InsertOnSubmit expects a specific strongly typed entity to be passed in. In your case, it is expecting Web_Service.Schedul‌e, but you are trying to pass in a qrOrder.
Schedule.InsertOnSubmit(qrOrd);
That line will not treat to submit changes to connected entity , Try this
db.Schedule.InsertOnSubmit(qrOrd);
db.SubmitChanges();
you can try with
db.GetTable(typeof(Schedule)).InsertOnSubmit(qrOrd);
Or
db.GetTable(qrOrd.GetType()).InsertOnSubmit(qrOrd);
Related
I have function which inserts record in database. I want to make sure that there are no duplicate entries in database. Function first checks if there is query string parameter. If there is, then it acts like edit mode otherwise insert mode. There is a function which can return currently added records in database. I need to check duplication based on two columns before insertion in database.
myService = new myService();
myFlow mf = new myFlow();
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(Request["myflowid"]))
{
mf = myService.Getmyflow(Convert.ToInt32(Request["myflowid"]));
}
int workcount = 0;
int.TryParse(txtWorkCount.Text, out workcount);
mf.Name = txtName.Text.Trim();
mf.Description = txtDescription.Text.Trim();
mf.FunctionCode = txtFunctioneCode.Text.Trim();
mf.FunctionType = txtFunctioneType.Text.Trim();
mf.WorkCount = workcount;
if (mf.WorkFlowId == 0)
{
mf.SortOrder = 0;
mf.Active = true;
mf.RecordDateTime = DateTime.Now;
message = "Saved Successfully";
}
else
{
_editMode = true;
message = "Update Successfully";
}
}
int myflowId = mfService.AddEditmyflow(mf);
I want to check duplication based on functiontype and functioncode. Another function mfService.Getmyflows() can return currently added records in database.
How can I check duplication using Linq?
First of all, what database do you use? Many databases support upsert behavior (update or insert depending of was data found or not). For example, MERGE in ms sql, MERGE in oracle, INSERT .. ON DUPLICATE in mysql and so on. This could be preferred solution. Upsert is usually an atomic operation.
In your particular case do you you transactions? Are you sure no one will insert data after you ensured about duplicates but before you have inserted your record? Example:
#1 thread #2 thread
look for duplicates
... look for duplicate
no duplicates found ...
no duplicates found
insert data_1
insert data_1
This will end up with duplicates you trying to avoid.
According to your code you populating data from GUI and adding only one item.
If you have access to myService code you could add method to query item by your two columns, instead of querying all items via mfService.Getmyflows() and looking through this collection inside your code. It would be more performant (especially if you have indexes in that columns) and more memory efficient.
And finally, existing of a single element inside collection can be easily done:
var alreadyExist = mfService.Getmyflows()
.Any(x => x.Column1 == value1 && x.Column2 == value2);
I am trying to add an entry into a table and use the primary key of that added entry to create an additional entry into another table.
The error I am getting is
The transaction manager has disabled its support for remote/network
transactions. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8004D024)
I believe this is caused by creating multiple connections within a single TransactionScope, but I am doing everything within one context / using statement, so I do not believe that I should be receiving this error.
Service
[OperationBehavior(TransactionScopeRequired = true)]
public void CreateGroup(NewGroupData data)
{
var groupRepo = _GroupRepo ?? new InvestigatorGroupRepository();
groupRepo.CreateGroup(data.UserId, data.InvestigatorGroupName, data.HasGameAssignment, data.InstitutionId);
}
Repository
public void CreateGroup(string userId, string investigatorGroupName, bool hasGameAssignment, int institutionId)
{
using (var context = new GameDbContext())
{
var newGroup = new InvestigatorGroup()
{
InvestigatorGroupName = investigatorGroupName,
HasGameAssignment = hasGameAssignment,
InstitutionId = institutionId,
IsTrashed = false
};
int institutionUserId =
context.InstitutionUsers.Where(
iu => !iu.IsTrashed && iu.APUser.UserId == userId && iu.InstitutionId == institutionId).Select(iu => iu.InstitutionUserId).Single();
var newGroupUser = new InvestigatorGroupUser()
{
InstitutionUserId = institutionUserId,
InvestigatorGroup = newGroup,
CreationDate = DateTime.Now
};
context.InvestigatorGroupUsers.Add(newGroupUser);
context.SaveChanges();
}
}
You start with a wrong assumption.
The line...
int newGroupId = context.InvestigatorGroups.Add(newGroup).InvestigatorGroupId;
...will always assign 0 to newGroupId. The Add method only marks the entity for insert, but doesn't actually insert it. Only SaveChanges writes data to the database, not any other method in Entity Framework.
So the assignment...
InvestigatorGroupId = newGroupId,
...is faulty as well. You have to assign the new InvestigatorGroup to a navigation property in InvestigatorGroupUser:
InvestigatorGroup = newGroup,
Add this navigation property to InvestigatorGroupUser if you haven't got it yet.
If you have that, it's enough to execute these lines:
context.InvestigatorGroupUsers.Add(newGroupUser);
context.SaveChanges();
No need to Add the newGroup object too, It will be added by adding newGroupUser.
So if you do that, the only transaction you need is the one that SaveChanges uses internally by default. For the code you show, you don't need a TransactionScope. If this is part of a greater WCF transaction the story may be different, but I think at least you needed some misconceptions to be straightened out.
Using Entity Framework,I need to Retreive A List Of Entities Then Manipulate This List Based On Some Conitions, then Save The Final List to Context.
Like This:
Sample
{
int id;
int value;
}
var sampleList=db.samples.toList();
//Add some records to sampleList
sampleList.Add(new sample(){value = 10});
//Change the Value of Some Records in sampleList
sampleList[0].value= 5 ;
db.savechanges()
Added Records to List Are not Tracked And Inserted To DB ,But Changed Values Are Updated.
Strange Behavior Of EF!! Any Explanation???
Thanks!
Hmm, base on your script, what should've been done is something like this.
//var sampleList=db.samples.toList();
//Add some records to sampleList
Sample sampInsertObject = new sample() { value = 10 };
db.samples.Add(sampInsertObject);
db.SaveChanges(); // execute save so that context will execute "INSERT"
/*
EF also executes SCOPE_IDENTITY() after insert to retrieve the
PrimaryKey value from the database to sampInsertObject.
*/
// Change the Value of Some Records in sampleList
var sampUpdateList = db.samples.ToList();
if(sampUpdateList.Count != 0)
{
// Get specific object from sample list
Sample sampUpdateObject = sampUpdateList.ToList()[0];
sampUpdateObject.Value = 5;
db.SaveChanges(); // execute save so that context will execute "UPDATE"
}
Let me first answer the easier question of why your new records were not saved. You cannot just modify the objects and call save changes, you need to either Add or Update the DataBase.
db.Add(sample); // If sample does not exist
db.Update(sample); //If sample already exists and you are updating it
db.SaveChanges();
As for modifying the list and saving that to context. I believe you will have to iterate over the list itself and Add, Delete, Update each Sample Object in it.
Table descriptions
Producer_Table as table: pro_id[int], pro_fname[varchar], pro_lname[varchar];
Artist_Table as table: pro_id[int], artist_id[int], artist_fname[varchar], artist_lname[varchar];
Song_table as table: artist_id[int], song_id[int], song_name[varchar], song_length[time]
C#
using(Datacontext context = new Datacontext())
{
Iqueryable<'Artist_Table> artist_query = context.Artist_Tables.where(aID => aId.artist_id == 8);
//Now say that I want to copy all of the data that the query returned and
//keep the original data in place,
//but add this data to a new Artist_Table object.
foreach(Artist_Table artItem in artist_query)
{
//Everything's good here.
Artist_Table artistObj = new Artist_Table();
artistObj.artist_fname = "Dally";
artistObj.artist_lname = "Winston";
//Now I'm looking to copy all of the Song_table data to this newly created entity.
//so it will sort of be duplicated, but with different inique ID values.
//..I did do another foreach(Song s in song_query), but it took way to long .
}
}
Use SQL Management Objects if it helps. Depending on how much data you want to transfer, it might be a solution for you.
I am writing a small application that does a lot of feed processing. I want to use LINQ EF for this as speed is not an issue, it is a single user app and, in the end, will only be used once a month.
My questions revolves around the best way to do bulk inserts using LINQ EF.
After parsing the incoming data stream I end up with a List of values. Since the end user may end up trying to import some duplicate data I would like to "clean" the data during insert rather than reading all the records, doing a for loop, rejecting records, then finally importing the remainder.
This is what I am currently doing:
DateTime minDate = dataTransferObject.Min(c => c.DoorOpen);
DateTime maxDate = dataTransferObject.Max(c => c.DoorOpen);
using (LabUseEntities myEntities = new LabUseEntities())
{
var recCheck = myEntities.ImportDoorAccess.Where(a => a.DoorOpen >= minDate && a.DoorOpen <= maxDate).ToList();
if (recCheck.Count > 0)
{
foreach (ImportDoorAccess ida in recCheck)
{
DoorAudit da = dataTransferObject.Where(a => a.DoorOpen == ida.DoorOpen && a.CardNumber == ida.CardNumber).First();
if (da != null)
da.DoInsert = false;
}
}
ImportDoorAccess newIDA;
foreach (DoorAudit newDoorAudit in dataTransferObject)
{
if (newDoorAudit.DoInsert)
{
newIDA = new ImportDoorAccess
{
CardNumber = newDoorAudit.CardNumber,
Door = newDoorAudit.Door,
DoorOpen = newDoorAudit.DoorOpen,
Imported = newDoorAudit.Imported,
RawData = newDoorAudit.RawData,
UserName = newDoorAudit.UserName
};
myEntities.AddToImportDoorAccess(newIDA);
}
}
myEntities.SaveChanges();
}
I am also getting this error:
System.Data.UpdateException was unhandled
Message="Unable to update the EntitySet 'ImportDoorAccess' because it has a DefiningQuery and no element exists in the element to support the current operation."
Source="System.Data.SqlServerCe.Entity"
What am I doing wrong?
Any pointers are welcome.
You can do multiple inserts this way.
I've seen the exception you're getting in cases where the model (EDMX) is not set up correctly. You either don't have a primary key (EntityKey in EF terms) on that table, or the designer has tried to guess what the EntityKey should be. In the latter case, you'll see two or more properties in the EDM Designer with keys next to them.
Make sure the ImportDoorAccess table has a single primary key and refresh the model.