Develop Reference

Backing up a solution/project to create a skeleton in c#

Maybe this is the wrong question. I don't understand the hierarchy/relationship between solutions and projects, so I'll describe my goal first. I have a forms application which works. I want to copy everything in it to another folder on the same PC with a different name which reflects the purpose of a new forms app I want to build. I want to use the old parent which I copied as a skeleton, a starting point. I've tried copying the whole WindowsFormsApplication1 and renaming it, but when it builds, it refers to stuff in the old parent folder. I want each of these to be totally self contained, not reference something above the new folder I just made with the skeleton.
Can someone describe the relationship between projects, solutions, the folder which gets created called WindowsFormsApplicationx and the .sln file? If this is too general, I'd be happy with just some step-by-steps to accomplish my goal.
Thanks for your patience,
Lamar
Thanks onlinecop, this helps but I’m still not all the way there.
When I created the forms application, it made a set of files and directories in the Studio2010/Projects directory:
WindowsFormsApplication2.sln
WindowsFormsApplication2.suo
WindowsFormsApplication2 (folder)
Bin (folder)
Obj (folder)
Properties (folder)
Form1.cs
Form1.Designer.cs
Form1.resx
Program.cs
WindowsFormsApplication2.csproj
WindowsFormsApplication2.csproj.user
I used Forms Designer to make a presentation layer, which although it doesn’t change much, it does change some.
I want to start with all of these and may or may not make changes to them but I will want to change all of their names.
Besides changing the names, most of my changes are in the Form1.cs and wherever Forms Designer keeps its changes. Since it is a graphical input and not text, I don’t know where it stores its stuff.
I’d like to do this without disturbing anything with the originals.
Almost none are unit tests, and most are new, addressing different applications so I don’t want to depend on a version control tool.
I’d like to not use them by reference, but instead by copy because I want the parents sequestered and unchanged.
So it would seem that I would want these to have completely different solutions, not projects inside of a solution….is this right?
Will the “Add Existing” do this for me, and where should I do it
As I’m reading the tutorials, my impression is that basically a solution is associated with an application and projects are sub-entities which might be incremental changes to host unit tests or debugging.
So since I want to make a completely different application, which I do not want to have confused with the parent, I’m thinking I want a new solution. But I want to use most of what I had in the parent so how can I create a new solution and populate it with the contents of the old source files and rename them? I’d like to not have them called Forms1.cs and WindowsFormsApplication2…..more something descriptive of what they are, like NeutronMigrationAnalysis…
If I’m asking the wrong question, it might become clearer if I understood when I should create a new solution instead of a single one with a gazillion projects in it.
Thanks!
Lamar

A solution contains multiple projects.
Let's say that you create a Unit Test. That test will run methods that you've created in a different project, just to ensure that those methods work correctly. So within this solution, you actually have two projects: one which is your normal forms app, and one that is a Unit Test which you, as a developer, can see but that end users won't.
The folders are merely hierarchal in nature: It helps you keep your projects separate, and files in places easy for you to find.
So take your original forms project, within your master solution. Your solution file (usually a .sln file) defines that you have a single project within it, and the directory where it's stored. It usually keeps track of other general or global information as well.
The forms project contains its own project file (usually a .csproj file), and is usually found within whatever subdirectory it was initially started in. That will define all the files that you want included, all of the special build options, the logical layout of your folders, files, and resources, and so on.
When you want to recreate a skeleton project, you will usually create a new, empty project. Then, copy all of the source files into it from your form project and "Add existing..." the files so they are seen by this project. Doing it this way will prevent the .csproj file from being copied from the original project and keeping all those old parent folder files/references.

How should I handle secret values in a project in source control?

My question is essentially the same as this one but for a Windows Store App, c# and Visual Studio. I want to have an easy way to keep secret values in the project, in a file that can be ignored in (not checked in to) source control. How should I structure my project to store the app secret in a way that makes building/source control easy?
My first idea was to store it in an XML file (not checked in), and load it at runtime, but this leaves it available to the user who installs it, so it should be done at build time. How can I store a couple secret values and have visual studio replace them in my code when my project is built?

In my company we decide to you following solution. In config file we link sections with "secret" values in external configs.
External configs are on source control. First it wasn't but after a problem when our build server lost a disk we decide it it safer to store it on a place which has backup. The folder in source control (can be also on file server) is really restricted to read and write to only people who needs this. Build process checkouts "project" folder plus "configuration" folder and do build. After build "configuration" folder is deleted. Access to build server is also restricted.

One option is to store the secrets in source control, but store them in an encrypted form. In your development or build environments, use a environment variable to store the key, and decrypt on the fly. That way you get the benefits of source control while keeping your info safe.
It is possible to do this even if you are using app.config or web.config, you just need to modify the configuration from code at startup.
Erick

Updated
If you put a secret in an untrusted area (e.g. public source control), it is vulnerable. Even if it's encrypted, with enough diligence it can be retrieved.
The only way to really keep it out of reach is to have an external service that interacts with the 3rd party API. That has its own trade-offs (e.g. user authentication as you mentioned in comments). Especially if your developers need to utilize the 3rd party API when testing, I see no other alternative that will limit the secret's exposure.

Create a new class file in your project that has slots for all of your secret values, and holds dummy/test values for all of them. Check that into source control with the rest of your project, so that anybody building it without access to the secrets will get some sort of test version.
Then, create a copy of that class file with the real secret values, and put it somewhere outside of source control. Write a batch script in the pre-build event that looks for this class file, and if found, replaces the dummy file that is included in the project with it.
This way, your project can still be in source control and anybody can check it out, build it, and run it in the test mode. Your secret file/values are stored on your build server only, so only when you build the project there will it have the real values.
Do remember to back up your secrets file somewhere. And also remember that .NET code can be decompiled easily, so your secrets may not be as secret as you hope them to be - any user with a .NET reflector can see all of the code in your release assembly, including your secret class.

c# help needed for application update

Hello guys I think the question i asked in the previous post is unclear OK fine. i am explaining in brief.
for example.
I have a form where i have placed one textbox and command button.
I have fired a event when i click the button the text under the textbox change to "hello" ok fine.
what is my problem is..
the application is created and I published ok.
After some week I thought I want to update my application. where in the place of "hello" I want "hi". I know that we can compile the whole project and publish it.
but I don't want my whole application to be updated.
for example.
What antivirus company do they have a definition file where they only update the definition file not the whole application. after the update it applies to whole application.
I want my application also to do same process like antivirus company do.

You should read that "Hello" from a content file (XML). Then you can just push out the new file.

Use a configuration file. You can add an application.config (or if you're developing a web app, web.config) file to your primary project. Within this configuration file, you can define AppSettings (which are built-in, usually simple and atomic string or number fields that the application will need), ConnectionStrings (which specifically provide information applications will need to connect to a database), or custom configuration sections (used for more complex, related sets of data that are loaded into custom classes you define, such as a basic company profile). Within your code, you access AppSettings by using the static ConfigurationManager.Appsettings[] collection; you tell it the name of the setting you defined in the file, and it returns the value (or null, if it can't find the setting you defined).
Related, but different, is the use of Resource files. Resource files usually contain a dictionary of location-specific data used by the UI, such as text strings, icons and images. Actual resources can be compiled into one big file, or resource files can be a list of paths and filenames to the actual resources. You can use resource files to create different "skins" for your application to be used by different companies by referencing images to use for UI elements, or to translate labels and other text on your application's UI. Resource files are accessed through a ResourceManager; you tell it where the resource file is, and it will load the information into a similar "dictionary"; you then tell it the name of the resource and you get the resource back.

For your specific question, I'll answer the same thing as Henk. But, I think that your real question is "How I do create patch in .NET".
You can check this link:
How can I patch .NET assemblies?

You could design your application to use plugins. This way you only have to update a plugin and not the whole application.

if you want to create a patch for asp.net application , first of all , you have to deploy your project with Web Deployment Project.
then choose Create a separate assembly for each page and control output in output assemblies tab and re-build your solution .
the result of deployment is bunch of DLL which mapped to each page or control.
Now if you changed one page's data (in code behind) , you need to deploy your project again but in this case you can just upload the changed dll file.

single exe with changeable settings

I am trying to make a simple application which will be used to point a web browser control to some of our web applications at my work. I would like to have only one exe file but also have an admin window to change some of the settings and have them persist when the application is closed. Is that possible? I have looked at the application settings resources part but as I understand that makes a file that loads the settings.
I don't want to have to parse a file or have anything but ONE file so please don't suggest doing that if it is possible.

Just use application settings - that will create a single file, you won't have to do any parsing, it'll all be fine.
It'll be separate to the exe file, but unless you meant that "ONE file" to include the executable and rewrite that on the fly, it should fit your description easily.
For example, let's build a console app that just remembers how many times it's been launched:
Create a new console application project
Go to the properties page, and click into the Settings tab.
Click on the link to create a settings file
Type in the table to create a setting called "LaunchCount" of type int. Make it either user scope or application scope, depending on whether you want it to be persisted per user or system-wide.
Hit Ctrl-S to save.
In the Main method in Program.cs, write this code:
Settings settings = Settings.Default;
settings.LaunchCount++;
Console.WriteLine("Launch count: {0}", settings.LaunchCount);
settings.Save();
Add the appropriate using directive for Settings (put the cursor in Settings and hit Ctrl-.)
Run the app several times, and observe the number increasing.

You can't have persisted settings without having a separate file...safely. You must either have a separate file, which is the standard and suggested approach approach, like the one created with Application settings, or you must use something like the registry to save settings.
Keep in mind, though, that using the registry is highly discouraged due to security reasons. Plus most companies don't allow access to registries anyway which means that anyone without this access could not use the settings feature.

There are several ways to do this. You can use a command-line argument to do that. Launch the app from the shell and put in your command line argument and change how it launches.
A UNIX-y approach is to look at the name of the exe and change behavior based on that. If I recall correctly, rsh and rlogin are the same executable - they just look at argv[0] to decide how to run. In windows, this is straight forward - look at System.Environment.GetCommandLineArgs - if there is a non-empty string in the 0th element of that, it will be your executable name.
For persisting settings, see Jon Skeet's answer.

I have to say that this is generally a bad idea, but I've done this before a long time ago in VB6. I created a Resource within the exe and then (somehow) directly manipulated it.
The problem is, is that this is usually not possible within the .NET framework due to it being memory resident. These guys tryed it out in .net and they ended up creating an program in IL to do the heavy lifting... Modify Emdeded String in C# compiled exe
Go with a settings file as Jon suggested!

How do you embed app.config in C# projects?

When you compile a C# project, the app settings from app.config are saved along with the exe file. For example, if the program name is "solve_np.exe", there will be a "solve_np.exe.config" next to it, making it look less neat than I want it to. How can you embed it into the .exe?
I tried to set Build Action to Embed Resource, but that did not do the trick.

Aha. I guess you're falling foul of Visual Studio automatically placing stuff in configuration that you DONT want configured by the end user.
In this case use resources. Simply add a new file of type .resx. With this you'll be able to add things like strings and images to the resource file. After you build this it should provide static access to the resources (it typically generates a code file from the resources for you so you don't have to access ResourceManager yourself).
E.G. If I made resources.resx with a string called MyConfigValue after a build I should be able to access this like:
textBox.Text = Resources.MyConfigValue;
If you want values that are kinda variable but shouldn't be configurable then this is the right place to put them.
HTH.

It isn't unprofessional to have an app.config file shipped alongside your exe. I think the word you may be looking for is untidy. I personally don't find this is the case myself however everyone is different! Perhaps you could simply make the app.config file hidden by default?
Or another alternative is to create your own config file which you could save to the App Data folder or even storing the settings in the registry instead.

Here's another factor to consider. Seasoned .Net developers are accustomed to the standard application design, which incorporates using config files in both web apps and desktop apps. If you depart from that practice, you will make it more difficult for any developers who follow you to understand what you have done. Even sa's on the web server may be confused by the absence of a config file.
Since pretty much everybody does it this way, your code does not look "untidy" to others. On the contrary, it would be befuddling not to see a config file where one is expected.

Typically the theory of a configuration file, is that it stores settings you may want to change once you've deployed the application (for something like user preferences). To do this, you need to be storing somewhere external to your application. If you use the default setup, you get "[Your].exe.config". There are many other options you could look at, but nearly every one of them ends up with a file written somewhere, if you providing a mechanism that saves settings of some kind.

I agree with serhio darasd and Quibblesome but you can just delete "solve_np.exe.config" and it'll just use default configs.

After considering what was written in these comments and other searching, I decided that the best way to handle my issue of wanting my Entity Framework connection string to be embedded into my executable instead of needing the MyApplication.exe.config file with my deployed solution was to created a derived class like such:
Public Class MyEFDataContainerLocal
Inherits MyEFDataContainer
Public Sub New()
MyBase.New(My.Settings.MyEFContainerConnectionString)
End Sub
End Class
I just created an Application Setting of type Connection String that contained the same string as what is found in the App.Config file. I just had to replace the &quote;'s with actual quotes.
Then whenever I wanted to use the MyEFDataContainer as in Dim db As New MyEFDataContainer I would just use Dim db As New MyEFDataContainerLocal instead.