Advice for loading application options - c#

I want to create a WinForms application.
This application will have many configurable options that will be saved in a database, so they can be persisted across executions (e.g. print settings, design options, etc.).
What approach would you recommend for loading these options, to avoid frequent access to the database?
Thanks!

If it security isn't important, you could also have the settings saved in an xml file that your form reads in. You could have a class that loads the properties that you need.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.xml.serialization.xmlserializer.aspx
[Serializable()]
public class Defaults
{
public string Description { get; set; }
public double Tolerance { get; set; }
public string Units { get; set; }
}
internal class FormDefaults
{
public void LoadSettings()
{
string kfileString = #"C:\Default_Settings.xml";
var q = from el in XElement.Load(kfileString).Elements()
select new FormDefault()
{
Description = el.Element("InstrumentDescription").Value,
Tolerance = Double.Parse(el.Element("InstrumentMassTolerance").Value),
Units = el.Element("InstrumentMassUnits").Value,
};
}
}
}
That's pretty rough but I had something similar that worked pretty well and was pretty easy to set up.
Cheers

There are some problems, the settings saved in the database will be shared by all the users. In this case you have think about having settings for each user. Better option would be saving in the local config file which can be encrypted and used. If anything needs to shared across users then can use db for that particular option. You can load those option before application loads and access it through objects.
You can do these database fetch operations in the SPlash screen by showing progress to the users.

Related

Fixing the deserializing of untrusted data using C#

I have the following relevant C# code:
json = File.ReadAllText(path);
isStudentObject= JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<List<XXStudentCode>>(json).Any(sv => sv.SCODE.Equals(code));
My security software (static code analysis) scans our apps and it does not like the above code, namely ReadAllText part. It says that this is a "high risk deserialization of untrusted data."
So my question is this: how can I refactor this code to make the data "trusted?" I tried different validation methods and it did not work. Any help is appreciated.
Basically search for a way of turn off the warning (through annotation or configuration file). But, before you do this, consider the implications: you should make sure that the data that you read is treated as unsecure. In other words: if, in your "XXStudentCode" object, exists some kind of flag or attribute/property that unlock things like give permission to execute some critical code or access to private things you should make sure that you do not trust the object after serialization.
Ex:
class Person
{
public bool IsAdmin { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set ; }
}
In the example above if the input comes with the attribute 'IsAdmin' with value true and your system treat all "Person's" with this attribute as a admin so you will have a security flaw. To overcome this you should create classes that only contains attributes and properties that you really need to read.
Fixed Ex:
class PersonModel
{
public string Name { get; set ; }
public Person ToPerson()
{
new Person { Name = Name };
}
}
class Person
{
public bool IsAdmin { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set ; }
}
Now, using the PersonModel in the deserialization, the only properties that you really want will be loaded, the rest you be ignored by the serialization library. But, this will not make you free to security flaws. If the deserialization library have some kind of security issue you will be affected too.
Hope this help.

Saving changes made to controls on form? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How can I save application settings in a Windows Forms application?
(14 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
Question
How can I save "settings" so that they can be used again after the application has been closed?
When I say settings I mean different properties of the controls on my form.
What is the easiest and most appropriate method? I've read you can save to the system registry or a xml file?
Background
I have a form that creates a row in a Table that changes depending on what control is set or change.
I would like to be able to save different configurations and display them in a combobox for repeated use.
Example
The end user fill in all textboxs and ticks checkboxes.
They then click add to favourites
They add a favourite name and save
The save is then permanently visible in the favourites combobox.
My form
There are many ways to do this. But in all these options, you need to store the users selection somewhere. You can store this in
A database table, associate the setting with a unique user ID, like LoginID
A Preferences XML file : Refer this
As a Setting in your project : Refer this
As a Registry Entry : Refer this
An INI File
You might want to take a look at Persisting Application Settings in the .NET Framework
One way you could save the data would be to write it to the registry, under the HKCU node. This way different users of your application will have their own settings even if the app is on the same machine. It also keeps the file system a little cleaner and doesn't require a database. But the downside is that the favorites only live on the machine, and don't roam with the user across devices.
A way to implement this would be to wrap your form settings in a class that knows how to save and load values from the registry. This, along with a registry helper class, could make it pretty easy to add "Favorites" functionality to your form.
For example, you could first create a Registry helper class that will read and write settings to the HKCU node (so the settings are specific to the logged in user):
public class RegHelper
{
private static readonly RegistryKey Root = Registry.CurrentUser
.CreateSubKey(#"Software\CompanyName\ApplicationName");
private readonly RegistryKey _thisKey = Root;
public RegHelper() { }
public RegHelper(string favoriteKey)
{
_thisKey = Root.CreateSubKey(favoriteKey);
}
public List<string> GetSubKeys()
{
return _thisKey.GetSubKeyNames().ToList();
}
public void SetProperty(string propertyName, string value)
{
_thisKey.SetValue(propertyName, value, RegistryValueKind.String);
}
public void SetProperty(string propertyName, bool value)
{
SetProperty(propertyName, value.ToString());
}
public string GetProperty(string propertyName)
{
return GetProperty(propertyName, string.Empty);
}
public string GetProperty(string propertyName, string defaultValue)
{
return _thisKey.GetValue(propertyName, defaultValue).ToString();
}
public bool GetPropertyAsBool(string propertyName)
{
return bool.Parse(GetProperty(propertyName, default(bool).ToString()));
}
}
Then, you could wrap the fields of your form into a class that not only has properties that match your form fields, but also has methods to save the values to the registry and some static methods to load all Favorites or a specific named Favorite. For example:
public class Favorite
{
public string Name { get; private set; }
public string Notes { get; set; }
public bool NotesFromPlanner { get; set; }
public string Project { get; set; }
public string DbLocation { get; set; }
public string AssesmentToolVersion { get; set; }
public string ProjectCodes { get; set; }
public bool StraightToNew { get; set; }
public Favorite(string name)
{
this.Name = name;
}
public void Save()
{
var reg = new RegHelper(this.Name);
reg.SetProperty("Name", Name);
reg.SetProperty("Notes", Notes);
reg.SetProperty("NotesFromPlanner", NotesFromPlanner);
reg.SetProperty("Project", Project);
reg.SetProperty("DbLocation", DbLocation);
reg.SetProperty("AssesmentToolVersion", AssesmentToolVersion);
reg.SetProperty("ProjectCodes", ProjectCodes);
reg.SetProperty("StraightToNew", StraightToNew);
}
public static Favorite GetFavorite(string favoriteName)
{
var reg = new RegHelper(favoriteName);
return new Favorite(favoriteName)
{
Notes = reg.GetProperty("Notes"),
NotesFromPlanner = reg.GetPropertyAsBool("NotesFromPlanner"),
Project = reg.GetProperty("Project"),
DbLocation = reg.GetProperty("DbLocation"),
AssesmentToolVersion = reg.GetProperty("AssesmentToolVersion"),
ProjectCodes = reg.GetProperty("ProjectCodes"),
StraightToNew = reg.GetPropertyAsBool("StraightToNew"),
};
}
public static List<Favorite> GetFavorites()
{
return new RegHelper().GetSubKeys().Select(GetFavorite).ToList();
}
public override string ToString()
{
return this.Name;
}
}
Then, you could use the Favorite class to populate your Favorites drop down:
private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// Get all saved favorites and load them up in the combo box
foreach (var favorite in Favorite.GetFavorites())
{
cboFavorites.Items.Add(favorite);
}
}
Now, when a favorite is picked from the combo box, we want to populate our form with the details:
private void cboFavorites_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
var favorite = (Favorite) cboFavorites.SelectedItem;
txtNotes.Text = favorite.Notes;
txtAssetToolVersion.Text = favorite.AssesmentToolVersion;
txtDbLocation.Text = favorite.DbLocation;
chkNotesFromPlanner.Checked = favorite.NotesFromPlanner;
txtProjectCodes.Text = favorite.ProjectCodes;
cboProjects.Text = favorite.Project;
chkStraightToNew.Checked = favorite.StraightToNew;
}
And when someone clicks "Save Favorite", we want to add (or update) the favorite details to the registry:
private void btnAddFavorite_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
string favoriteName = cboFavorites.Text;
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(favoriteName))
{
MessageBox.Show("Please type a name for the favorite in the Favorites box.");
return;
}
var favorite = new Favorite(favoriteName)
{
Notes = txtNotes.Text,
AssesmentToolVersion = txtAssetToolVersion.Text,
DbLocation = txtDbLocation.Text,
NotesFromPlanner = chkNotesFromPlanner.Checked,
ProjectCodes = txtProjectCodes.Text,
Project = cboProjects.Text,
StraightToNew = chkStraightToNew.Checked
};
favorite.Save();
// When saving a favorite, add it to the combo box
// (remove the old one first if it already existed)
var existingFav = cboFavorites.Items.Cast<Favorite>()
.FirstOrDefault(fav => fav.Name == favoriteName);
if (existingFav != null)
{
cboFavorites.Items.Remove(existingFav);
}
cboFavorites.Items.Add(favorite);
cboFavorites.Text = favoriteName;
}
This should be enough to get you started, if you want to go the registry route.
It depends on your application and what it's used for and its architecture.
There are multiple options:
You could save it in a database.
This option is nice when there are a lot of settings and especially nice in a multi-user platform. If this is a client server application, this may also be preferable for that reason. If you want to keep this simple and don't see user settings getting complex / having very many, this may not be the best option.
You could save it in a flat file. This option is similar to the first, but likely better in the case where your application is more stand-alone and/or you just don't have any other benefit of having those settings on a server.
You could store them in your Applications Settings. There is a good answer regarding how to do that here: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/0zszyc6e%28v=vs.110%29.aspx
Another thing to consider is how you want to load those settings. For windows forms development, having classes which define your layout and binding to those classes can be useful. Therefore, you may want to store this data in XML which can be easily serialized directly into a class which defines what your form looks like. You would be able to store that XML anywhere really: Locally or on the server in a database.

replacement for static variable

I am developing an ASP.NET MVC 4 application. userMenus is a static variable that is loaded every time a user logs in.
public class MenuCL
{
public static List<UserMenu> userMenus = new List<UserMenu>(); // the static variable
}
public class UserMenu
{
public decimal MenuID { get; set; }
public string MenuName { get; set; }
public string Controller { get; set; }
public bool Permission { get; set; }
}
I use that static variable to check whether or not the logged in user has permission to a menu/controller in a custom authorize filter.
It works fine when a single user is logged in, but when two or more users are logged-in, it's all messed up, I mean the error page("you don't have access to this page") is displayed to a user that has permission to the menu/controller.
Only now I realized it's the static variable that is causing all the trouble, after I read this :
The static variables will be shared between requests. Moreover they will be initialized when application starts, so if the AppDomain, thus application gets restarted, their values will be reinitialized.
So I need a replacement for this static variable. Anyone has any suggestion?
You can still use a static field which is a property that provides access to a session variable.
public static List<UserMenu> UserMenus
{
set
{
Session["UserMenus"] = value;
}
get
{
return Session["UserMenus"] == null ? new List<UserMenu>() : (List<UserMenu>) Session["UserMenus"];
}
}
In order to get this working on a web farm which uses a session state server (or sql server), you need to put [Serializable] attribute on top of UserMenu.
I don't think, this way you need to modify your code very much.
My question is, why do you want to use static variable? Do you want to share the values across the application? In this case you can better use session.
Updated
Assume lst as a non static List of UserMenu. Then you can use the following method to store it in session and get it bak whenever you want.
To store
Session["usemenulist"] = lst;
To get it back
try
{
lst = (List<UserMenu>)Session["usemenulist"];
}
catch
{
}
Note
If you are getting the values from the database lo load it to the List for the first time, then you can query database to get it from the database whenever you want, instead of storing it in the session. (This is another option apart from Session, you may try this way also if you want.)

ASP.NET maintaining static variables

Recently we learned about AppDomain Recycling of IIS and how it affects static variables setting them to their primary values (nulls, 0s, etc).
We use some static variables that are initialized in a static constructor (for first time initialization, configuration values like "number of decimal places", "administrator email", etc... that are retrieved from DB) and then only read their value along the website execution.
Whats the best way of solving this problem? Some possible ideas:
Checking if variable is null/0 at each retrieval (don't like it because of a possible performance impact + time spent to add this check to each variable + code overload added to the project)
Somehow preventing AppDomain Recycling (this reset logic doesn't happen in Windows forms with static variables, shouldn't it work similarly as being the same language in both environments? At least in terms of standards as static variables management)
Using some other way of holding these variables (but we think that for being some values used for info as global reference for all users, static variables were the best option performance/coding wise)
Subscribing to an event that is triggered in those AppDomain Recycling so we can reinitialize all those variables (maybe best option if recycling can't be prevented...)
Ideas?
I would go with the approach that you don't like.
Checking if variable is null/0 at each retrieval (don't like it because of a possible performance impact + time spent to add this check to each variable + code overload added to the project)
I think it's faster than retireving from web.config.
You get a typed object
Its not a performance impact as you are not going to database on every retrieval request. You'll go to database (or any source) only when you find that current value set to its default value.
Checking the null wrapped into code:
public interface IMyConfig {
string Var1 { get; }
string Var2 { get; }
}
public class MyConfig : IMyConfig {
private string _Var1;
private string _Var2;
public string Var1 { get { return _Var1; } }
public string Var2 { get { return _Var2; } }
private static object s_SyncRoot = new object();
private static IMyConfig s_Instance;
private MyConfig() {
// load _Var1, _Var2 variables from db here
}
public static IMyConfig Instance {
get {
if (s_Instance != null) {
return s_Instance;
}
lock (s_SyncRoot) {
s_Instance = new MyConfig();
}
return s_Instance;
}
}
}
Is there any reason why you can't store these values in your web.config file and use ConfiguationManager.AppSettings to retrieve them?
ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["MySetting"] ?? "defaultvalue";
In view of your edit, why not cache the required values when they're first retrieved?
var val = HttpContext.Cache["MySetting"];
if (val == null)
{
val = // Database retrieval logic
HttpContext.Cache["MySetting"] = val;
}
It sounds like you need a write-through (or write-behind) cache, which can be done with static variables.
Whenever a user changes the value, write it back to the database. Then, whenever the AppPool is recycled (which is a normal occurrence and shouldn't be avoided), the static constructors can read the current values from the database.
One thing you'll have to consider: If you ever scale out to a web farm, you'll need to have some sort of "trigger" when a shared variable changes so the other servers on the farm can know to retrieve the new values from the server.
Comments on other parts of your question:
(don't like [Checking if variable is null/0 at each retrieval] because of a possible performance impact + time spent to add this check to each variable + code overload added to the project
If you use a write-through cache you won't need this, but in either case The time spent to check a static variable for 0 or null should be negligible.
[AppDomain recycling] doesn't happen in Windows forms with static variables, shouldn't it work similarly as being the same language in both environments?
No, WebForms and WinForms are completely different platforms with different operating models. Web sites should be able to respond to many (up to millions) of concurrent users. WinForms are built for single-user access.
've resolved this kind of issue, following a pattern similar to this. This enabled me to cater for handling circumstances where the data could change. I set up my ISiteSettingRepository in the bootstrapper. In 1 application I get the configuration from an XML file but in others I get it from the database, as and when I need it.
public class ApplicationSettings
{
public ApplicationSettings()
{
}
public ApplicationSettings(ApplicationSettings settings)
{
ApplicationName = settings.ApplicationName;
EncryptionAlgorithm = settings.EncryptionAlgorithm;
EncryptionKey = settings.EncryptionKey;
HashAlgorithm = settings.HashAlgorithm;
HashKey = settings.HashKey;
Duration = settings.Duration;
BaseUrl = settings.BaseUrl;
Id = settings.Id;
}
public string ApplicationName { get; set; }
public string EncryptionAlgorithm { get; set; }
public string EncryptionKey { get; set; }
public string HashAlgorithm { get; set; }
public string HashKey { get; set; }
public int Duration { get; set; }
public string BaseUrl { get; set; }
public Guid Id { get; set; }
}
Then a "Service" Interface to
public interface IApplicaitonSettingsService
{
ApplicationSettings Get();
}
public class ApplicationSettingsService : IApplicaitonSettingsService
{
private readonly ISiteSettingRepository _repository;
public ApplicationSettingsService(ISiteSettingRepository repository)
{
_repository = repository;
}
public ApplicationSettings Get()
{
SiteSetting setting = _repository.GetAll();
return setting;
}
}
I would take a totally different approach, one that doesn't involve anything static.
First create a class to strongly-type the configuration settings you're after:
public class MyConfig
{
int DecimalPlaces { get; set; }
string AdministratorEmail { get; set; }
//...
}
Then abstract away the persistence layer by creating some repository:
public interface IMyConfigRepository
{
MyConfig Load();
void Save(MyConfig settings);
}
The classes that can read and write these settings can then statically declare that they depend on an implementation of this repository:
public class SomeClass
{
private readonly IMyConfigRepository _repo;
public MyClass(IMyConfigRepository repo)
{
_repo = repo;
}
public void DoSomethingThatNeedsTheConfigSettings()
{
var settings = _repo.Load();
//...
}
}
Now implement the repository interface the way you want (today you want the settings in a database, tomorrow might be serializing to a .xml file, and next year using a cloud service) and the config interface as you need it.
And you're set: all you need now is a way to bind the interface to its implementation. Here's a Ninject example (written in a NinjectModule-derived class' Load method override):
Bind<IMyConfigRepository>().To<MyConfigSqlRepository>();
Then, you can just swap the implementation for a MyConfigCloudRepository or a MyConfigXmlRepository implementation when/if you ever need one.
Being an asp.net application, just make sure you wire up those dependencies in your Global.asax file (at app start-up), and then any class that has a IMyConfigRepository constructor parameter will be injected with a MyConfigSqlRepository which will give you MyConfigImplementation objects that you can load and save as you please.
If you're not using an IoC container, then you would just new up the MyConfigSqlRepository at app start-up, and manually inject the instance into the constructors of the types that need it.
The only thing with this approach, is that if you don't already have a DependencyInjection-friendly app structure, it might mean extensive refactoring - to decouple objects and eliminate the newing up of dependencies, making unit tests much easier to get focused on a single aspect, and much easier to mock-up the dependencies... among other advantages.

C# save/retrieve an array of structures from settings file

I have a simple question (I think) that I'm not making much progress finding an answer to with Google. I have a structure as follows:
/// <summary>
/// A class to represent the sync settings for a single camera.
/// </summary>
public class CameraSyncSettings
{
public string ID { get; set; }
public string SyncPath { get; set; }
public bool OverwriteExisting { get; set; }
};
And then an array of these in the program, one for each camera:
List<CameraSyncSettings> MyCameraSettings = new List<CameraSyncSettings>();
Now, what I want to do is have a property in my settings such that I can read/write this array into it to persist the information between sessions.
How can I do this and what is the best/most efficient way?
You can achieve it by using Properties.Settings of type ListDictionary
Example:
Properties.Settings.Default.Example.Add("Setting1", new CameraSyncSettings());
Properties.Settings.Default.Example.Add("Setting2", new CameraSyncSettings());
Properties.Settings.Default.Example.Add("Setting3", new CameraSyncSettings());
Properties.Settings.Default.Save();
see link for more information : http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa730869(v=vs.80).aspx
NB: You can set the Scope of Properties.Settings.Default.Example to Application or User
As we've cleared in the comments you want to use app.config: this project should pretty much cover all your needs.

Categories

Resources