Edmx .net 4.0 The specified named connection is either not found - c#

The specified named connection is either not found in the configuration, not intended to be used with the EntityClient Provider, not valid."
I have a working console project. However when I tried to copy the exe and the app.config (same folder) to a live server it didn't work and got the following error. Could it be a domain issue, or some setting that's baked in? I'm pretty sure it has access to databases since I have used other projects except this time is different because I chose edmx.
<connectionStrings>
<add name="AdvWorksEntities" connectionString="metadata=res://*/GroupsModel.csdl|res: //*/GroupsModel.ssdl|res://*/GroupsModel.msl;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string="Data Source=abcd;Initial Catalog=AdvWorks;Persist Security Info=True;User ID=user;Password=pass;MultipleActiveResultSets=True"" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient" />
</connectionStrings>

Solution
The app.config is a file name used in a project. However, when it is compiled, the file name becomes application's exe name + .config.
For example, if the application name is "sample.exe", then the configuration name should be "sample.exe.config".

Related

Migrating multiple DbContexts in two different projects in the same solution

I have two seperate projects in the same solution. One is a windows sevice and the other is a ASP.Net application. The solution doesn't have a seperate data layer. The projects communicate to its own separate database. In the second project which is the web application when i try to do a Enable migration with the following command in the "Package Manager Console", I get an error.
The command:
enable-migrations -ContextTypeName ServicesMock.Data.MockContext -
MigrationsDirectory:MockMigrations
The error refers to the first project and says that the context type "ServicesMock.Data.MockContext" was not found in the assembly "Assembly of the first project in my solution"
How can i sought this out so that the migration command can be pointed to the relevant project ?
I was referring to this link to create the commands.
I tried changing the startup project as well.
Updated (added this section)
Corrected the issue of not selecting the proper Default Project in the package manager console.
In the first Project (Windows service) the Application.config file contains the dbcontext for that project
<connectionStrings>
<add name="ApplicationDbContextConnection" connectionString="data source=abc;initial catalog=serviceDB;user id=;password=;MultipleActiveResultSets=True;App=EntityFramework" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient"/>
</connectionStrings>
The purpose of the second project (Web Application) is to mock some External API references used in the first project. It doesn't have a application.config, instead a web.config.
It has its own DbContext. I have added the connection string in the web.config which is
<connectionStrings>
<add name="MockContext" connectionString="Data Source=abc;Initial Catalog=mockDB;Persist Security Info=True;User ID=;Password=" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
</connectionStrings>
But now when I try to EF migrate the 2nd project(Web Application) , I get an error "No connection string named 'MockContext' could be found in the application config file." But the web application does not use a app.config file. Is it referring to the 1st project ?

EntityFramework through Class Library

I have a class library called DataManip, a webform project and a winform project.
DataManip is a class that will contain all the necessary methods to manipulate the database, including handling migrations and database updates.
The .mdf database is also inside the DataManip project.
The problem that I am having right now, is that when I setup a connection string in the App.config file of DataManip, it doesn't recognize the |DataDirectory| substitution string.
Connection string :
<add name="Context" connectionString="Data Source=(LocalDB\v11.0;AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|DB\mydatabase.mdf;Integrated Security=True providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
Harcoding the path in AttachDbFilename will successfully generate the database, but working with team members make this approach not possible.
The error message that I get when I try to run update-database in DataManip is :
A file activation error occured. The physical file name '\DB\mydatabase.mdf' may be incorrect...
How can I get the DataDirectory substitution string to work in a class library?

No connection string named could be found in the application config file

I'm using EF and generated .EDMX from it but then I only wanted it to be used for automated generation of Class Files.
I then used the Class Files to create a Entity Model and then created a DB Context and then Repository. I'm calling a WebApi (which is in a separate project but same solution) to access the repository to GET data. While I run the WebApi, I'm getting the error,
{"No connection string named 'DBEntities' could be found in the application config file."}
But within my DAL, I have a webConfig and that has the following entry so I'm not quite sure what has gone wrong,
add name="DBEntities" connectionString="metadata=res://*/Models.DBModel.csdl|res://*/Models.DBModel.ssdl|res://*/Models.DBModel.msl;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string="data source=MY-PC;initial catalog=DB;integrated security=True;multipleactiveresultsets=True;application name=EntityFramework"" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient"
In the DBContext file, remove
public RaficaDB()
: base("name=DefaultConnection"){}
to
public RaficaDB()
: base("DefaultConnection"){}
EF 4.3, EF 5 and EF 6 do not like the connection string being called name=xxxxx
Answer found here -> No connection string named 'MyApplicationEntities' could be found in the application config file
You say "within my DAL, I have a webConfig". I guess the connection string is in the configuration file of a referenced class library, but not in the main configuration file you have in your entry project (a web api project, I guess looking at the tags).
If so, just copy the connection string in the entry project configuration file.
Insert following section in the configuration section of the .config file of the same project where your .edmx file is under.
You may also create different connection string for different environment in the .config file of the main project and pass any of the connection string as parameter of the constructor of the DBContext.
<connectionStrings>
<add name="DBEntities" connectionString="metadata=res://*/Models.DBModel.csdl|res://*/Models.DBModel.ssdl|res://*/Models.DBModel.msl;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string="data source=MY-PC;initial catalog=DB;integrated security=True;multipleactiveresultsets=True;application name=EntityFramework"" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient" />
</connectionStrings>
Setting the project as Startup project worked for me
I found that this worked:
1) Check if you have several "App.config" files.
2) Check if has a wrong name than the connection string it has to use.
3) Save the project and run the program
It should work now.
Copy and paste the connectionstring to your WEBAPI Project web.config file will solve the issue.
It's dumb, but I had this error that was fixed by a Rebuild All !!
Might as well have turned it off and on again....
If none of the above fixes the issue, then probably you are doing the mistake I did, here was my case:
I have multiple projects in my solution and the Startup project was different than the one having the entity framework, switching project from the package manager console seems like a buggy thing especially in entity framework commands, so here what I did:
Set your webapi(Or the project has the entity framework) as a startup project.
Rebuild the solution and try again.
Run the entity framework command again.
If the above doesn't work then try to close the solution and try from Step 2, this should fix it.
The easiest solution:
Remove current edmx file and related connection string in app.config
and add Edmx item with same name as previous again.
this worked for me.

Code-First Migrations for multiple databases?

I have the following connection string:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<connectionStrings>
<add name="MyContext" connectionString="metadata=res://*;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string='data source=SQLSERVERDB;initial catalog=TestDB_CodeFirst;user id=***;password=***;MultipleActiveResultSets=True;App=EntityFramework'" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient" />
</connectionStrings>
</configuration>
When I try to enable migrations I first get a warning:
Cannot determine a valid start-up project. Using project 'MyApp.Model' instead.
Your configuration file and working directory may not be set as expected.
Use the -StartUpProjectName parameter to set one explicitly.
Then I get this exception:
Argument 'xmlReader' is not valid. A minimum of one .ssdl artifact must be supplied.
Is the connection string wrong and why should I need ssdl if I'm using Code First?
NOTE
My context is in MyApp.Model project where my Migrations folder should be located.
I don't have connection strings in my main startup project because connection strings are retrieved from a second database and the user can select one of them when logging in to the application.
I have just one connection string shown above in my MyApp.Model project which points to my development database.
Also, my second question is:
If I use CF migrations, will all databases be migrated each time a user selects a different database for the first time?
EDIT
I changed the connection as mentioned below, and I get the following exception:
The item with identity 'table1' already exists in the metadata collection.
Parameter name: item
It must be noted that I reverse-engineered an existing database. So I don't know what possibly went wrong!
I've also deleted the Migrations folder and checked the database but there is no migration_history table created.
You are trying to use a connectionString designed to work with Database First / Model First. You can tell because your providerName is System.Data.EntityClient instead of System.Data.SqlClient.
Your connection string should look like this:
<connectionStrings>
<add name="MyContext"
connectionString="Data Source=SQLSERVERDB; Initial Catalog=TestDB_CodeFirst;user id=***;password=***;"
providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
</connectionStrings
Although I would suggest using Integrated Security instead of a user/password. Just personal preference, though.

WebService doesn't read web.config

I've got 3 connectionstrings in web.config, and I used theirs like this:
using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["SomeName"].ConnectionString))
Every metgod is called by winforms application.
One of webmethods doesn't work properly because it reads only one connectionString:
data source=.\\SQLEXPRESS;Integrated Security=SSPI;AttachDBFilename=|DataDirectory|aspnetdb.mdf;User Instance=true
It's not a connectionString from my web.config .
I invoke every method in the same way.
How it's impossible ??
EDITED:
I use facade: This is structure:
WinForms calls WebMethod SaveItem
SaveItem calls method on Facade: SaveItemAndDoDatabaseStuff
SaveItemAndDoDatabaseStuff does database stuff.
We can't see your web structure, but is it possible that your app isn't configured as an application in IIS, therefore is picking up the master web.config? Which would look exactly like that...
Go into IIS and ensure it is an application (it may have a cog icon).
If your WinForms application talks directly to database X (not via the web service), then the connection string for database X should be in app.config (in the WinForms project).
If your Web Service (as I understand, this includes your facade and your database layer), talks to databases X, Y and Z, then the connection strings for X, Y, and Z need to be in web.config (in the Web Services Project).
It's using the default connection string asp.net has (in the machine.config in the .net installation folders).
Do a clear:
<configuration>
<connectionStrings>
<clear/>
... your connection strings here
</connectionStrings>
</configuration>
Btw, when you say you are using "SomeName" in the connection string. It isn't surely any random connection string you used, its the default: "LocalSqlServer".
You should store the connection-strings in the web.config or app.config in whatever project that you are executing.
In your case, you should have the connection-strings in your app.config for your winforms application.
Why not just add a Trace line to print out the configuration file being used just before you ask for the connection string. Simply add the following line:
System.Diagnostics.Trace.WriteLine(
System.AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetupInformation.ConfigurationFile,
"APP_CONFIG");
Set a breakpoint after this and look at the Output window for a line that starts with "APP_CONFIG:". This will give the full path to the configuration file and allow you to determine where it's being loaded. If you still see a discrepancy between the runtime values and the configuration file then likely something is changing those values at runtime within your application.
This is a late answer, but perhaps worthwhile.
I have a web-service project, and I want to run it in two modes.
One is "local as app" (for testing), and for that, at least in my current system setup, the file where it reads from is
Web.config (which it apparently reads in deug mode INSTEAD of Web.Debug.config, at least for database configuration)
So, one replace the attribute section with and copy in the ones you would use in the "Calling project for hte web service).
So replace
<connectionStrings>
<add name="MyDB"
connectionString="Data Source=ReleaseSQLServer;Initial Catalog=MyReleaseDB;Integrated Security=True"
xdt:Transform="SetAttributes" xdt:Locator="Match(name)"/>
</connectionStrings>
with
<appSettings>
<!-- Database Connection -->
<add key="AppDatabase" value="RedactedDatabase"/>
<add key="AppLoginID" value="RedactedLoginID"/>
<add key="AppLoginPwd" value="RedactedPwd"/>
</appSettings>
The above are found in app.config in the "calling project".... To me, this is more elegant anyway.
Now it will work in both modes.
One could use a conditional compile in the C#, but now you just read it in:
C# code:
String whichDatabase = System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["AppDatabase"];
String appUsedID = System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["AppLoginID"];
String appUsedPwd = System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["AppLoginPwd"];
The above works in either mode, without conditional compile directives.

Categories

Resources