I am a bit confused as to why I am getting this error:
Introducing FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK_QuestionTerms_Terms_TermId'
on table 'QuestionTerms' may cause cycles or multiple cascade paths.
Specify ON DELETE NO ACTION or ON UPDATE NO ACTION, or modify other
FOREIGN KEY constraints. Could not create constraint. See previous errors.
I have a class Question and a class Term, Questions may have any number of Terms associated with them, and Terms may have any number of Questions associated with them. So I am attempting to create a many to many relationship between the two. First I attempted to use convention, and I am allowing EntityFramework to create the database. This is the Question class
public class Question
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public int QuestionNumber { get; set; }
public string StatementHtml { get; set; }
public string AnswerHeaderHtml { get; set; }
public string NotesHtml { get; set; }
public Guid CategoryId { get; set; }
public Guid CourseId { get; set; }
public Guid QuestionTypeId { get; set; }
public Guid? SimulationId { get; set; }
public Guid? SimulationTabId { get; set; }
public ICollection<Term> Terms { get; set; }
public ICollection<ReferenceItem> ReferenceItems { get; set; }
}
And here is the Term Class
public class Term
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string StatementHtml { get; set; }
public string Authority { get; set; }
public Guid ProductId { get; set; }
public Product Product { get; set; }
public ICollection<Question> Questions { get; set; }
}
I have also attempted to override OnModelCreating as follows, both process result is the exact same error code.
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Entity<Question>()
.HasMany(q => q.Terms)
.WithMany(t => t.Questions)
.Map(x =>
{
x.MapLeftKey("QuestionId");
x.MapRightKey("TermId");
x.ToTable("QuestionTerms");
});
}
The problem is that a cacade delete would go back and forth between the tables.
For example first deleting term A which would delete question 1,2 and 3. Question 1 was also used in term B so term B must be deleted .....
It therefore stops you creating such constraints.
There is a good coverage of how to fix it here: Entity Framework 4.1 InverseProperty Attribute and ForeignKey
Edit
This could be a side effect of other problems. You should start with a much simpler model and then gradually build it up.
For example:
Why do you have both ProductId and product
Why CategoryId and not Category
...
Try adding it in your OnModelCreating() method
modelBuilder.Entity<Question>().HasRequired(oo => oo.Term).WithMany(oo => oo.Questions).WillCascadeOnDelete(false);
Related
I'm creating a Razor Pages application that resembles a "hockey league". As I'm still grasping the concept of foreign/primary keys, I'm not quite sure if I'm setting up my data model correctly. After attempting to update my database after a migration I am getting the following error that has led me to believe I didn't set them up correctly:
Introducing FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK_Team_Division_DivisionID' on table 'Team' may cause cycles or multiple cascade paths. Specify ON DELETE NO ACTION or ON UPDATE NO ACTION, or modify other FOREIGN KEY constraints.
Based on these three entities, am I clearly doing something wrong?
public class Team
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public int? CoachID { get; set; }
public int? DivisionID { get; set; }
public int? ConferenceID { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Team")]
public string TeamName { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Location")]
public string TeamLocation { get; set; }
public Coach Coach { get; set; }
public Division Division { get; set; }
public Conference Conference { get; set; }
public ICollection<Player> Players { get; set; }
}
public class Conference
{
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.None)]
public int ID { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Conference")]
public string ConferenceName { get; set; }
public ICollection<Division> Divisions { get; set; }
public ICollection<Team> Teams { get; set; }
}
public class Division
{
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.None)]
public int ID { get; set; }
public int ConferenceID { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Division")]
public string DivisionName { get; set; }
public Conference Conference { get; set; }
public ICollection<Team> Teams { get; set; }
}
My idea is that every Team will belong to a Conference and a Division. There can be many Teams in a Division, and many Divisions in a Conference.
The problem you're running into is that SQL server doesn't know how to handle a Delete of an item that has multiple parents. You'll need to help it out a bit. Choose a route that you want Team to be deleted on, for instance:
Conference --> Division --> Team
Then you must determine the routes that you don't want it to be deleted on, for instance:
Conference --> Team
Once you've decided which routes won't be used for deletion, you can specify it in the OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder) method for your context
modelBuilder.Entity<Conference>()
.HasRequired(x => x.Team)
.WithMany()
.WillCascadeOnDelete(false);
EDIT
Pretty sure I got that backwards above, try this:
modelBuilder.Entity<Team>()
.HasRequired(x => x.Conference)
.WithMany()
.WillCascadeOnDelete(false);
When using data annotations with EF4.1 RC is there an annotation to cause cascade deletes?
public class Category
{
public int Id { get; set; }
[Required]
public string Name { get; set; }
public ICollection<Product> Products { get; set; }
}
public class Product
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public Category Category { get; set; }
}
Using this model the constraint generated is:
ALTER TABLE [Product] ADD CONSTRAINT [Product_Category]
FOREIGN KEY ([Category_Id]) REFERENCES [Categorys]([Id])
ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION;
If not how is it achieved?
Putting required on the Product table Category relationship field solves this
public class Product
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
[Required] //<======= Forces Cascade delete
public Category Category { get; set; }
}
I like to turn off cascade delete by default (by removing the OneToManyCascadeDeleteConvention)
I was then hoping to add them back in via annotations, but was surprised that EF doesn't include a CascadeDeleteAttribute.
After spending way too long working around EF's ridiculous internal accessor levels, the code in this gist adds a convention that allows attributes to be used: https://gist.github.com/tystol/20b07bd4e0043d43faff
To use, just stick the [CascadeDelete] on either end of the navigation properties for the relationship, and add the convention in your DbContext's OnModeCreating callback. eg:
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
modelBuilder.Conventions.Remove<OneToManyCascadeDeleteConvention>();
modelBuilder.Conventions.Remove<ManyToManyCascadeDeleteConvention>();
modelBuilder.Conventions.Add<CascadeDeleteAttributeConvention>();
}
And in your model:
public class BlogPost
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public string Content { get; set; }
[CascadeDelete]
public List<BlogPostComment> Comments { get; set; }
}
Not sure on Data Annotations, but you can add it in the database by modifying the actual relationship.
Looks like the answer is no for data annotations:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/adonetefx/thread/394821ae-ab28-4b3f-b554-184a6d1ba72d/
This question appears to show how to do it with the fluent syntax, but not sure if that applies for 4.1 RC
EF 4.1 RC: Weird Cascade Delete
As an additional example to Tyson's answer, I use the [CascadeDelete] attribute like follows in an entity, which successfully adds the "Cascade" delete rule to the Parent-Child relation.
public class Child
{
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
[Key]
[SkipTracking]
public Guid Id { get; set; }
[CascadeDelete]
public virtual Parent Parent { get; set; }
[Required]
[ForeignKey("Parent")]
public Guid ParentId { get; set; }
}
I have two classes that relate to one another (one-to-many) and I thought I had the properties setup correctly, but when I run the Update-Database command for my migration, I get the following error:
Introducing FOREIGN KEY constraint
'FK_dbo.ParentEnrollment_dbo.CellGroup_CellGroupID' on table
'ParentEnrollment' may cause cycles or multiple cascade paths. Specify
ON DELETE NO ACTION or ON UPDATE NO ACTION, or modify other FOREIGN
KEY constraints. Could not create constraint or index. See previous
errors.
My two classes:
[Table("CellGroup")]
public class CellGroup : BaseEntity
{
public Guid AcademicYearID { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("AcademicYearID")]
public virtual AcademicYear AcademicYear { get; set; }
public Guid LeaderID { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("LeaderID")]
public virtual Parent Leader { get; set; }
public Guid PreviousGroupID { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("PreviousGroupID")]
public virtual CellGroup PreviousGroup { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public int MaximumSize { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<ParentEnrollment> Parents { get; set; }
}
and
[Table("ParentEnrollment")]
public class ParentEnrollment : BaseEntity
{
public Guid ParentID { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("ParentID")]
public virtual Parent Parent { get; set; }
public Guid AcademicYearID { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("AcademicYearID")]
public virtual AcademicYear AcademicYear { get; set; }
public bool FirstTimeEnrolling { get; set; }
public string HSLDAAccountNumber { get; set; }
public DateTime HSLDARenewalDate { get; set; }
public string CurrentChurch { get; set; }
public string CurrentChurchContact { get; set; }
public string CurrentChurchPhone { get; set; }
public Guid CellGroupID { get; set; }
[Required]
[ForeignKey("CellGroupID")]
public virtual CellGroup CellGroup { get; set; }
public bool VolunteerBuyOut { get; set; }
public Guid VolunteerPositionID { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("VolunteerPositionID")]
public virtual VolunteerPosition VolunteerPosition { get; set; }
public string VolunteerPositionNotes { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<StudentEnrollment> StudentEnrollments { get; set; }
}
I only have the Parents property on the CellGroup class so I can easily access the list of enrollments in that cell group. I tried to remove the property to see if it cleared up the warning/error, but it did not. Can someone spot where I have gone wrong with my model(s)?
This error says that you cannot introduce a foreign key from table ParentEnrollment to table CellGroup that has cascading delete enabled, because this will create multiple cascade paths, which is not allowed on SQL Server.
According to the code you posted both tables have relations to a table Parent as well as AcademicYear, which are on non nullable FK columns, so EF will enable cascading on delete by default. With another FK from ParentEnrollment to CellGroup there would be multiple cascade paths, e.g. Parent to CellGroup to ParentEnrollment and Parent to ParentEnrollment, and this is causing your error. Removing the Parent property won't solve this because there still is the same cascading path problem starting from table AcademicYear.
So you have to disable cascading delete for your foreign key, which has to be done using Fluent API in your DbContext like this:
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
modelBuilder.Entity<ParentEnrollment>()
.HasRequired(m => m.CellGroup)
.WithMany(m => m.Parents)
.HasForeignKey(m => m.CellGroupID)
.WillCascadeOnDelete(false);
}
I'm trying to create a linked table that will allow me to have a many to many relationship between my product and accessory tables.
My classes are like this:
public class Product {
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Accessory> Accessories { get; set; }
}
public class Accessory {
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Machine> Machine { get; set; }
}
public class Type {
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
The same accessory can be on a product more than once if it is a different type, which will be determined in the link table. Something like this:
public class ProductAccessoryLink {
public int productId {get; set;}
public int accessoryId {get; set;}
public int typeId {get; set}
public int sort {get; set;}
public string notes {get; set}
}
Is this the right approach.
EDIT
This is the error I'm getting when I run update-database:
Introducing FOREIGN KEY constraint
'FK_dbo.ProductAccessoryLinks_dbo.Types_TypeId' on table
'ProductAccessoryLinks' may cause cycles or multiple cascade paths.
Specify ON DELETE NO ACTION or ON UPDATE NO ACTION, or modify other
FOREIGN KEY constraints. Could not create constraint. See previous
errors.
This is the sql causing the error: ALTER TABLE
[dbo].[ProductAccessoryLinks] ADD CONSTRAINT
[FK_dbo.ProductAccessoryLinks_dbo.Types_TypeId] FOREIGN KEY ([TypeId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Types] ([Id]) ON DELETE CASCADE
In your case you need to map explicitly the junction table. Your model would be like this:
public class Product
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<ProductAccessoryLink> ProductAccessoryLinks { get; set; }
}
public class Accessory
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<ProductAccessoryLink> ProductAccessoryLinks { get; set; }
}
public class Type
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class ProductAccessoryLink
{
public int ProductId { get; set; }
public int AccessoryId { get; set; }
public int TypeId { get; set; }
public int sort { get; set; }
public string notes { get; set; }
public virtual Type Type { get; set; }
public virtual Product Product { get; set; }
public virtual Accessory Accessory { get; set; }
}
And you could configure the relationships overriding the OnModelCreating method on your context this way:
protected override void OnModelCreating(System.Data.Entity.DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Entity<ProductAccessoryLink>().HasKey(i => new { i.ProductId, i.AccesoryId, i.TypeId});
modelBuilder.Entity<ProductAccessoryLink>()
.HasRequired(i => i.Product)
.WithMany(k => k.ProductAccessoryLinks)
.HasForeignKey(i=>i.ProductId);
modelBuilder.Entity<ProductAccessoryLink>()
.HasRequired(i => i.Accesory)
.WithMany(k => k.ProductAccessoryLinks)
.HasForeignKey(i=>i.AccesoryId);
modelBuilder.Entity<ProductAccessoryLink>()
.HasRequired(i => i.Type)
.WithMany()
.HasForeignKey(i=>i.TypeId);
}
EF lets you configure directly many-to-many relationships of the way you were attempting to. Thereby EF is responsible for build a join table in the database with the appropriate keys of the tables it’s joining. (The keys are both primary keys of the join table and foreign keys pointing to the joined tables). That lets you to get your data across the join table without you having to be aware of its presence. But when you want to personalize that table (adding, for example, some additional properties), you need to map it explicitly as I show above.
Update
That exception is caused when you have multiple paths of cascade deletes that could end trying to delete the same row in the Types table. To resolve that problem I recommend you check my answer in this post
I'm using ASP.NET MVC 4 Entity Framework 5 to generate a code first migration for a database structure of the below classes that have relationships between them. However I've encountered a problem where it's causing this error whenever I try to update my database from the migration:
Paste Bin of the migration file can be found here: http://pastebin.com/ngXacrKV
Error returned:
Introducing FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK_dbo.Bookings_dbo.Rooms_RoomId' on table 'Bookings' may cause cycles or multiple cascade paths. Specify ON DELETE NO ACTION or ON UPDATE NO ACTION, or modify other FOREIGN KEY constraints.
Could not create constraint. See previous errors.
Bunk.cs
public class Bunk
{
[Key]
public int BunkId { get; set; }
public BunkStatus BunkStatus { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("Room")]
public int RoomId { get; set; }
public virtual Room Room { get; set; }
// Added for convenience
public virtual ICollection<Booking> Bookings { get; set; }
}
Room.cs
public class Room
{
[Key]
public int RoomId { get; set; }
public string RoomName { get; set; }
public Gender RoomGender { get; set; }
public RoomStatus RoomStatus { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Bunk> Bunks { get; set; }
// Added for convenience
public virtual ICollection<Booking> Bookings { get; set; }
}
Bookings.cs
public class Booking
{
[Key]
public int BookingId { get; set; }
//[ForeignKey("UserProfile")]
//public int UserProfileId { get; set; }
//public UserProfile UserProfile { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("Bunk")]
public int BunkId { get; set; }
public Bunk Bunk { get; set; }
public int Duration { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("Preferred_Room")]
public int RoomId { get; set; }
public Room Preferred_Room { get; set; }
public Decimal Price { get; set; }
public BookingStatus BookingStatus { get; set; }
}
What would the best work around be to remove this issue without causing too much disturbance to the original class structure. I'm not too worried about adding new joining tables as long as I can still access the code in a Lazy loading way in my controllers/view models.
you can try to specify Fluent API to set no cascade delete
public class YOURContext: DbContext{
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder) {
// here is where fluent API goes.
// I suspected the error is EF wanting a NO cascade delete. Hence the suggestion to try
entity<Booking>.HasOptional(t => t.Bunk)
.WithOptionalPrincipal()
.WillCascadeOnDelete(false); // <<<<<< this is the option to try.
// you may also need to try the same with Preferred_Room as well.
If no cascade delete is required then in Database context class we can set cascade delete to false for all the relationships by overriding OnModelCreating method as given below. Default EF makes it cascade delete that is why you are getting exception of cycles or multiple delete path.
public class MyContext: DbContext
{
//db sets defined
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
modelBuilder.Entity<PrimaryKeyTable>().HasMany(x => x.ChildTableCollection).WithRequired(x =>
Key).WillCascadeOnDelete(false);
//In your case
modelBuilder.Entity<Bunk>().HasMany(x => x.Bookings).WithRequired(x =>
x.BunkId).WillCascadeOnDelete(false);
// same for room if required.
}
}