Develop Reference

c# dynamic event subscription and unsubscription

I want to be able to have an object add one of its methods to an EventHandler that is passed to it and give said method the ability to remove itself from the EventHandler.
public class EventRaiser {
public event EventHandler event1
public event EventHandler event2
public void fire() {
event1?.Invoke(this, null);
event2?.Invoke(this, null);
}
}
public class EventSubscriber {
EventHandler eh;
public EventSubscriber(EventHandler eh) {
this.eh = eh;
eh += receive;
}
public void receive(object obj, EventArgs data) {
// Do stuff.
if(condition) eh -= receive;
}
}
public class MainClass {
public void Main() {
EventRaiser er = new EventRaiser();
EventSubscriber es1 = new EventSubscriber(er.event1);
EventSubscriber es2 = new EventSubscriber(er.event2);
er.fire();
}
}
The above code does not compile as I cannot even pass er.event1 or er.event2 to EventSubscriber ("The event can only appear in the left hand side of +=..."). Removing the event keyword from the EventHandlers fixes this issue but unsubscribing does not work properly. Is there a way to make this work? Use pointers maybe?

The problem here comes from you passing an EventHandler, not the list holding the delegates behind it itsself. Basically the "list of method pointers" to your handlers.
As you can see, in the declaration of event1 you have the keyword event, which is missing when you pass it somewhere else.
Unfortunately you cannot extract the "delegate holder" of an event easily.
Basically at the time you want to register your handler to an event you somehow need a compile time reference to it, in order to be able to += and -= to it.
You could do the following:
public class EventRaiser
{
public delegate void Event1(string args);
public List<Event1> handlers = new List<Event1>();
public void register(Event1 handler)
{
handlers.Add(handler);
}
public void unregister(Event1 handler)
{
handlers.Remove(handler);
}
public void fire()
{
handlers.ForEach(handler => handler("myEventArgs"));
}
}
public class EventSubscriber
{
Action<Event1> registerAction;
Action<Event1> unregisterAction;
public EventSubscriber(Action<Event1> register, Action<Event1> unregister)
{
registerAction = register;
unregisterAction = unregister;
registerAction(receive);
}
public void receive(string args)
{
// Do stuff.
unregisterAction(receive);
}
}
public class MainClass
{
public void Main()
{
EventRaiser er = new EventRaiser();
EventSubscriber es1 = new EventSubscriber(er.register, er.unregister);
er.fire();
}
}

Questions about unit test

Recently, I am learning unit test and try to use this skill in my project.
However, I have some question about how to test following code.
public class Class1
{
private Timer _timer = new Timer();
public Class1()
{
_timer.Interval = 1000;
_timer.Elapsed += _timer_Elapsed;
}
private void _timer_Elapsed(object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e)
{
//some works
}
public void start()
{
_timer.Start();
//some works
}
public void stop()
{
_timer.Stop();
//some works
}
}
I truly don't know how to test this class without breaking its encapsulation.
Should I expose '_timer_Elapsed' method? Evan if do so, next question comes to how to test method 'start' and 'stop'. Should I use stub object to substitute the Timer in order to test this class? if that, this class will be too complex because I need to make an interface and make a class which encapsulates Timer and implement the interface above.
public interface IEncal
{
double Interval { get; set; }
event ElapsedEventHandler Elapsed;
void Stop();
void Start();
}
public class MyClass : IEncal
{
Timer timer = new Timer();
public double Interval { get { return timer.Interval; } set { timer.Interval = value; } }
public event ElapsedEventHandler Elapsed
{
add { timer.Elapsed += value; }
remove { timer.Elapsed -= value; }
}
public void Start()
{
timer.Start();
}
public void Stop()
{
timer.Stop();
}
}
public class Class1
{
private IEncal _timer;
public Class1(IEncal timer)
{
_timer = timer;
_timer.Interval = 1000;
_timer.Elapsed += _timer_Elapsed;
}
public void _timer_Elapsed(object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e)
{
//some works
}
public void start()
{
_timer.Start();
//some works
}
public void stop()
{
_timer.Stop();
//some works
}
}
Is there any better way to test this class?
The following is the real code I use.
I've written the unit test for ISender class and IInfoProducer class.
Since it's my first time to use unit test, I would like to think about each class for learning.
Back to the question, this class is basically a Timer class. When elapsing ,
it sends a info. So how should I test this timing sending process?
public class InfomationSender
{
private readonly Timer _timer = new Timer();
private readonly ISender _sender;
private readonly IInfoProducer _producer;
public InfomationSender(ISender sender, IInfoProducer producer)
{
_sender = sender;
_producer = producer;
_timer.Interval = 1000;
_timer.Elapsed += _timer_Elapsed;
}
private void _timer_Elapsed(object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e)
{
var info = _producer.getInfo();
_sender.send(info);
}
public void start()
{
_timer.Start();
}
public void stop()
{
_timer.Stop();
_sender.Dispose();
}
}

You should be able test the class without mocking. Less mocking more valuable tests are.
But you didn't provide information about what your code is doing in // some works areas. Because this is what you want to test, timer is just implementation details.
For testing "some works" class should provide some public access to the result of "some works" or result will be "exposed" through injected dependency (repository, logger etc)
Assume class will execute "some work" every second and update Result property after Stop method is called.
public class LiveCalculator
{
private readonly Timer _timer;
private List<int> _allValues
private int _lastSum;
public int LastSum => _lastSum;
public LiveCalculator()
{
_allValues = new List<int>();
_timer = new Timer { Interval = 1000 };
_timer.Elapsed += _timer_Elapsed;
}
private void _timer_Elapsed(object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e)
{
_allValues.Add(42);
}
public void start()
{
_timer.Start();
}
public void stop()
{
_timer.Stop();
_lastResult = _allValues.Sum();
}
}
Tests
[Fact]
public async Task AfterFiveSeconds_LastResultEquals210()
{
var calculator = new LiveCalculator();
calculator.Start();
await Task.Delay(5100);
calculator.Stop();
calculator.LastResult.Should().Be(210);
}

asp.net custom cache dependency, refresh all in at one moment

I've got a custom cache dependency
class MyCacheDependency : CacheDependency
{
private const int PoolInterval = 5000;
private readonly Timer _timer;
private readonly string _readedContent;
public MyCacheDependency()
{
_timer = new Timer(CheckDependencyCallback, this, PoolInterval, PoolInterval);
_readedContent = ReadContentFromFile();
}
private void CheckDependencyCallback(object sender)
{
lock (_timer)
{
if (_readedContent != ReadContentFromFile())
{
NotifyDependencyChanged(sender, EventArgs.Empty);
}
}
}
private static string ReadContentFromFile()
{
return File.ReadAllText(#"C:\file.txt");
}
protected override void DependencyDispose()
{
if (_timer != null) _timer.Dispose();
base.DependencyDispose();
}
}
It works perfectly, but Im wondering how to make a refresh of all the object in one time. Here I put into cache 2 objects
Cache.Insert("c1", "var1", new MyCacheDependency());
Cache.Insert("c2", "vae2", new MyCacheDependency());
Its fine, but when c1 will detect change how to force c2 to don't wait 5 seconds to check but I want to call itself DependencyDispose when c1 do it.
In other words, if c1 detects change, c2 also should call DependencyDispose

Maybe you could add a static event which would be fired in your CheckDependencyCallback()-method. In your constructor for the MyCacheDependency you would then attach an eventhandler. When the event is fired you could call NotifyDependencyChanged or DependencyDispose from there. In this way all MyCacheDependency-objects would react to a change.
class MyCacheDependency : CacheDependency
{
private const int PoolInterval = 5000;
private readonly Timer _timer;
private readonly string _readedContent;
public static event EventHandler MyEvent;
public MyCacheDependency()
{
_timer = new Timer(CheckDependencyCallback, this, PoolInterval, PoolInterval);
_readedContent = ReadContentFromFile();
MyEvent += new EventHandler(MyEventHandler);
}
protected void MyEventHandler(object sender, EventArgs e) {
NotifyDependencyChanged(sender, e);
}
private void CheckDependencyCallback(object sender)
{
lock (_timer)
{
if (_readedContent != ReadContentFromFile())
{
if(MyEvent!=null)
MyEvent(sender, EventArgs.Empty);
}
}
}
private static string ReadContentFromFile()
{
return File.ReadAllText(#"C:\file.txt");
}
protected override void DependencyDispose()
{
if (_timer != null) _timer.Dispose();
base.DependencyDispose();
}
}

Event Bus implementation question

I'm trying to implement simple Event Bus
I started like this:
public class RegistrationData
{
public object RegisteredObject { get; set; }
public Type eventType { get; set; }
public EventHandler MethodToInvoke;
}
public class EventBus
{
private static EventBus instance;
private static readonly object lockObject = new object();
private static List<RegistrationData> registrationList;
private EventBus()
{
}
public static EventBus Instance
{
get
{
lock (lockObject)
{
registrationList = new List<RegistrationData>();
return instance ?? new EventBus();
}
}
}
public void Subscribe(RegistrationData registrationData)
{
if(!registrationList.Contains(registrationData)) registrationList.Add(registrationData);
}
public void Unsubscribe(object objectToUnregister, Type eventType)
{
foreach(RegistrationData data in registrationList)
if (data.RegisteredObject == objectToUnregister && data.eventType == eventType) registrationList.Remove(data);
}
public void UnregisterAllMessages(object objectToUnregister)
{
foreach(RegistrationData data in registrationList)
if(data.RegisteredObject == objectToUnregister) registrationList.Remove(data);
}
public void PublishEvent(object sender, EventArgs eventArgs)
{
foreach (RegistrationData data in registrationList)
if (EventArgs is typeof(data.Type)) data.MethodToInvoke(sender, eventArgs);
}
}
But I have problem in PublishEvent method. I'm unable to determine type of event argument.
And I'm suspicious that all this is pretty wrong.
Can someone point out what I do wrong, how should I implement this?
Or how event bus is generally implemented, or some framework which I can use instead of implementing my own and spending time on that.

Um, not really sure how your Eventbus should behave. Short of knowing where you are heading it can be useful to look at how other people implemented the problem.
There is a down-to-earth event aggregator in the caliburn.micro project
I like to use MemBus when I need an event aggregator, partly because I wrote it myself, partly because it covers all my needs in that respect. It is more involved than caliburn's one, but then it has more features

I think you should start by defining Event Bus. What do you see as the difference between an Event Bus and the built-in .NET mechanisms for firing and sinking events? What you have so far looks like it implements not much more than the equivalent of .NET events. .NET intrinsically supports event handling so you wouldn't need an event bus if you don't need more than what .NET already provides:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
BusinessObject1 bo = new BusinessObject1("First Value");
// Subscribe
bo.Publish += new BusinessObject.PublishObject(bo_Publish);
bo.Update("Second Value");
// UnSubscribe
bo.Publish -= new BusinessObject.PublishObject(bo_Publish);
bo.Update("Third Value");
// Subscribe multiple
bo.Publish += new BusinessObject.PublishObject(bo_Publish);
bo.Publish += new BusinessObject.PublishObject(bo_Publish2);
bo.Update("Fourth Value");
// UnregisterAllMessages
bo.UnsubcribeAll();
bo.Update("Fifth Value");
}
static void bo_Publish(BusinessObject sender, EventArgs args)
{
if (sender is BusinessObject1)
{
BusinessObject1 bo1 = (BusinessObject1)sender;
BusinessObject1.PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs args1 =
(BusinessObject1.PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs)args;
Console.WriteLine("Updated {0} to {1}", args1.oldValue, bo1.Value);
}
}
static void bo_Publish2(BusinessObject sender, EventArgs args)
{
if (sender is BusinessObject1)
{
BusinessObject1 bo1 = (BusinessObject1)sender;
BusinessObject1.PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs args1 =
(BusinessObject1.PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs)args;
Console.WriteLine("Second handler detected updated of {0} to {1}", args1.oldValue, bo1.Value);
}
}
}
abstract class BusinessObject
{
public delegate void PublishObject(BusinessObject sender, EventArgs args);
public event PublishObject Publish;
// PublishEvent
protected void Update(EventArgs args)
{
if (Publish != null)
Publish(this, args);
}
public void UnsubcribeAll()
{
Publish = null;
}
}
class BusinessObject1 : BusinessObject
{
public class PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs : EventArgs
{
public string oldValue;
public PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs(string oldValue)
{
this.oldValue = oldValue;
}
}
public delegate void PublishBusinessObject1(BusinessObject1 sender, PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs args);
public string Value {get; private set;}
public BusinessObject1(string value)
{
this.Value = value;
}
public void Update(string newValue)
{
PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs args = new PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs(Value);
Value = newValue;
base.Update(args);
}
}
Edit:
If you don't want your business objects to have to inherit from a common base class (as you suggested in your comment) you can make a few modifications so that EventBus stands more independently, but you still don't need to re-implement all the event registration framework to do this:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
BusinessObject1 bo = new BusinessObject1("First Value");
// Subscribe
EventBus.Publish += new EventBus.PublishObject(EventBus_Publish);
bo.Update("Second Value");
// UnSubscribe
EventBus.Publish -= new EventBus.PublishObject(EventBus_Publish);
bo.Update("Third Value");
// Subscribe multiple
EventBus.Publish += new EventBus.PublishObject(EventBus_Publish);
EventBus.Publish += new EventBus.PublishObject(EventBus_Publish2);
bo.Update("Fourth Value");
// UnregisterAllMessages
EventBus.UnsubcribeAll();
bo.Update("Fifth Value");
}
static void EventBus_Publish(object sender, EventArgs args)
{
if (sender is BusinessObject1)
{
BusinessObject1 bo1 = (BusinessObject1)sender;
BusinessObject1.PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs args1 =
(BusinessObject1.PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs)args;
Console.WriteLine("Updated {0} to {1}", args1.oldValue, bo1.Value);
}
}
static void EventBus_Publish2(object sender, EventArgs args)
{
if (sender is BusinessObject1)
{
BusinessObject1 bo1 = (BusinessObject1)sender;
BusinessObject1.PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs args1 =
(BusinessObject1.PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs)args;
Console.WriteLine("Second handler detected updated of {0} to {1}", args1.oldValue, bo1.Value);
}
}
}
static class EventBus
{
public delegate void PublishObject(object sender, EventArgs args);
public static event PublishObject Publish;
// PublishEvent
public static void Update(object sender, EventArgs args)
{
if (Publish != null)
Publish(sender, args);
}
public static void UnsubcribeAll()
{
Publish = null;
}
}
class BusinessObject1
{
public class PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs : EventArgs
{
public string oldValue;
public PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs(string oldValue)
{
this.oldValue = oldValue;
}
}
public delegate void PublishBusinessObject1(BusinessObject1 sender, PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs args);
public string Value { get; private set; }
public BusinessObject1(string value)
{
this.Value = value;
}
public void Update(string newValue)
{
PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs args = new PublishBusinessObject1EventArgs(Value);
Value = newValue;
EventBus.Update(this, args);
}
}
Edit 2: By the way, if you want more control over the subscription process, you can get more control there too by defining custom event accessors as described at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb882534.aspx:
static class EventBus
{
public delegate void PublishObject(object sender, EventArgs args);
private static List<PublishObject> subscribers = new List<PublishObject>();
public static event PublishObject Publish
{
add
{
subscribers.Add(value);
Console.WriteLine("Added subscriber {0}.{1}", value.Method.DeclaringType.Name, value.Method.Name);
}
remove
{
bool result = subscribers.Remove(value);
Console.WriteLine("Removed subscriber {0}.{1} ({2})", value.Method.DeclaringType.Name, value.Method.Name, result ? "success" : "failure");
}
}
// PublishEvent
public static void Update(object sender, EventArgs args)
{
foreach (PublishObject p in subscribers)
{
Console.WriteLine("Publishing to {0}.{1}", p.Method.DeclaringType.Name, p.Method.Name);
p.Invoke(sender, args);
}
}
public static void UnsubcribeAll()
{
subscribers.Clear();
}
}

Well, as a first suggestion, it looks to me as if you're trying to implement this as a singleton. Otherwise, what would the
private static EventBus instance;
be good for? But the private instance member is never assigned anywhere, that's one thing I'd suggest you should fix. For reference, here's a really good article on various implementations of singletons. If you've got access to .net4 I'd suggest you use the LazySingleton3 approach.
The only other thing that comes to mind is, this looks like it could be a use-case for Generics. Have a look at the EventHandler<TEventArgs> Delegate.
Apart from that, I can't recommend much more since I don't exactly understand what you're trying to do.
EDIT
Have a look at the accepted answer on this question. It contains a link to a blog post of someone who implemented this several years ago. Seems like you don't need to re-invent the wheel.

How to pass an event to a method?

I would like to create a method that takes an event as an argument and adds eventHandler to it to handle it properly. Like this:
I have two events:
public event EventHandler Click;
public event EventHandler Click2;
Now I would like to pass a particular event to my method like this (pseudocode):
public AttachToHandleEvent(EventHandler MyEvent)
{
MyEvent += Item_Click;
}
private void Item_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
MessageBox.Show("lalala");
}
ToolStripMenuItem tool = new ToolStripMenuItem();
AttachToHandleEvent(tool.Click);
Is it possible?
I've noticed that this code worked fine, and returned to my project and noticed that when I pass an event declared in my class, it works, but when I pass event from other class it still does not work.
What I get is this error:
The event
'System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.Click'
can only appear on the left hand side
of += or -=

My original answer was suitable from within the class that defined the event, but you've since updated your question to reflect that you wish to accomplish this from outside the defining class, so I've stricken that.
Only the class that defines an event can refer to the implicit delegate variable that the event uses. From outside that class, you only have access to the add and remove methods, via += and -=. This means that you can't do what you're asking, directly. You can, however, use a functional approach.
class A{
public event EventHandler Event1;
public void TriggerEvent1(){
if(Event1 != null)
Event1(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
}
class B{
static void HandleEvent(object o, EventArgs e){
Console.WriteLine("Woo-hoo!");
}
static void AttachToEvent(Action<EventHandler> attach){
attach(HandleEvent);
}
static void Main(){
A a = new A();
AttachToEvent(handler=>a.Event1 += handler);
a.TriggerEvent1();
}
}

I did it like this:
public AttachToHandleEvent(Object obj, string EventName)
{
EventInfo mfi = obj.GetType().GetEvent(EventName);
MethodInfo mobj = mfi.GetAddMethod();
mobj.Invoke(obj, new object[] { Item_Click});
}
private void Item_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
MessageBox.Show("lalala");
}
ToolStripMenuItem tool = new ToolStripMenuItem();
AttachToHandleEvent(tool "Click");
Thank you all for advice. This solution could not be done without your help.

It's not possible. You can use a delegate instead of an event if that meets your needs.

Just write tool.Click += Item_Click;
Edit: From MSDN "Events can only be invoked from within the class or struct where they (it) are declared". So what you are trying to do is not possible. Could you elaborate more on your needs? Why would you want to pass an event as a parameter?

delegate void doIt(object sender, object data);
event doIt OnDoIt;
void add(doIt theDel)
{
OnDoIt += theDel;
}
void doIt1(object a, object b)
{
}
void doIt2(object a, object b)
{
}
void add()
{
add(doIt1);
add(doIt2);
}

Your question suggests that you got some mechanisms wrong:
You can't pass events!
You most probably want to pass a function as a parameter, so the calling method will call that other method at some point. In technical terms this is a delegate. I suggest using the already defined Action class. Here's an example snippet:
void MyFunction (string otherArguments, Action onFinished){
...
if (onFinished != null)
onFinished.Invoke();
}
The nice thing about this is that when calling MyFunction you can declare the Action using the inline syntax:
MyFunction("my other argument", ()=>{
///do stuff here, which will be execuded when the action is invoked
});

I pass functions/methods (instead of events) like this:
class A
{
public void something()
{
var myAction =
new Action<object, object>((sender, evArgs) => {
MessageBox.Show("hiii, event happens " + (evArgs as as System.Timers.ElapsedEventArgs).SignalTime);
});
B.timer(myAction);
}
}
class B
{
public static void timer( Action<object, System.Timers.ElapsedEventArgs> anyMethod)
{
System.Timers.Timer myTimer = new System.Timers.Timer();
myTimer.Elapsed += new System.Timers.ElapsedEventHandler(anyMethod);
myTimer.Interval = 2000;
myTimer.Start();
}
}

Giving an update to this question with an object oriented solution.
Instead of using an Action<EventHandler> that registers the event, you could create an object handling that for you
public class AEvent
{
private readonly A aInstance;
private AEvent(A instance) {
aInstance = instance;
}
public void Add(EventHandler eventHandler)
=> a.Event1 += eventHandler;
public void Remove(EventHandler eventHandler)
=> a.Event1 -= eventHandler;
public EventHandler Invoke => aInstance.Event1;
}
Then later on use that object like this:
static void Main(){
A a = new A();
AEvent aEvent = new AEvent(A)
aEvent.Add(handler);
a.Invoke();
}

One approach I haven't seen here would be to create an object which has delegates for subscribe and unsubscribe. Here is a complete example program.
class Program
{
private event EventHandler<EventArgs> eventHandler;
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
Program program = new Program();
Thing thing = new Thing(new EventWrapper<EventArgs>(
delegate(EventHandler<EventArgs> handler) { program.eventHandler += handler; },
delegate(EventHandler<EventArgs> handler) { program.eventHandler -= handler; }
));
// events are fired
program.eventHandler?.Invoke(program, EventArgs.Empty);
thing.Unsubscribe();
}
}
class Thing
{
private readonly Action<EventHandler<EventArgs>> _unsubscribeEventHandler;
public Thing(EventWrapper<EventArgs> eventHandler)
{
this._unsubscribeEventHandler = eventHandler.Unsubscribe;
eventHandler.Subscribe?.Invoke(OnEvent);
Console.WriteLine("subscribed");
}
private void OnEvent(object? sender, EventArgs e)
{
Console.WriteLine("event fired");
}
public void Unsubscribe()
{
_unsubscribeEventHandler?.Invoke(OnEvent);
Console.WriteLine("unsubscribed");
}
}
class EventWrapper<T> where T : EventArgs
{
public Action<EventHandler<T>> Subscribe { get; private set; }
public Action<EventHandler<T>> Unsubscribe { get; private set; }
public EventWrapper(Action<EventHandler<T>> subscribe, Action<EventHandler<T>> unsubscribe)
{
Subscribe = subscribe;
Unsubscribe = unsubscribe;
}
}
In this example, we created a new class called EventWrapper<T> which wraps delegates for += and -= and exposes them with Subscribe and Unsubscribe methods. The delegates will need to be created by the class which created the event.