Develop Reference

Using single method to return possible different instance types

So I have got these 2 instance types "FirstType" and "SecondType" which inherit from the mother class "ContaBancaria". They both return text from different textboxes. Basically, they do the same thing, but I need 2 instances for 2 different list types (I probably don't think the list has anything to do with my question, so I'll proceed not to go in detail)
Here are the instances:
private FirstType AddTypeFirst()
{
return new FirstType(textBoxNumber.Text,
textBoxBalance.Text,
textBoxName.Text,
textBoxAddress.Text,
textBoxBirth.Text);
}
private SecondType AddTypeSecond()
{
return new SecondType(textBoxNumber.Text,
textBoxBalance.Text,
textBoxName.Text,
textBoxAddress.Text,
textBoxBirth.Text);
}
Is there a way to return these 2 instances with the same method type?
EDIT:
What I meant was to return these 2 different types of instances with 1 single method, for example:
private [type?] AddInstance()
{
return new [type*] textBoxNumber.Text, //* the type could be FirstType or SecondType
textBoxBalance.Text,
textBoxName.Text,
textBoxAddress.Text,
textBoxBirth.Text);
}
EDIT 2:
ContaBancaria looks like this:
abstract class ContaBancaria
{
public string number { get; set; }
public string balance { get; set; }
public Client data { get; set; }
}
And, since there's Client...
class Client
{
public string name;
public string address;
public string birth;
}
Hope you get me.

You can use generic method and derrived classes I think.
For example, you have two classes and you want to receive one of them. Those classes are named "FirstSon" and "SecondSon" and both of them are derrived from class "Father".
class Father
{
string myName;
public string MyName
{
get { return myName; }
set { myName = value; }
}
public Father()
{
myName = "John";
}
}
class FirstSon : Father
{
string mySecondName;
public string MySecondName
{
get { return mySecondName; }
set { mySecondName = value; }
}
public FirstSon()
{
mySecondName = "Bill";
}
}
class SecondSon : Father
{
int age;
public int Age
{
get { return age; }
set { age = value; }
}
string mySecondName;
public string MySecondName
{
get { return mySecondName; }
set { mySecondName = value; }
}
public SecondSon()
{
mySecondName = "Drake";
age = 21;
}
}
And you have method GetObject(). This method is generic. It receives type of class, then checks what type it has received and returnes the new object with the same type.
public static T GetObject<T>() where T: Father
{
var firstSon = new FirstSon();
var secondSon = new SecondSon();
if (firstSon.GetType() == typeof(T))
return (T)Convert.ChangeType(firstSon, typeof(T));
return (T)Convert.ChangeType(secondSon, typeof(T));
}
It uses method Convert.ChangeType(object value, Type conversonType) and allows you to convert your object to your type.
But I am not convinced that this is a good idea according to How do I make the return type of a method generic?

Assuming you want to return the proper type based on the list being added to, you will need to write your own generic Add function, and use Reflection to figure out the type:
public static class Ext {
public static void AddInstancia<T>(this List<T> aList) where T : class {
if (typeof(T) == typeof(FirstType))
aList.Add(AddTypeFirst() as T);
else
aList.Add(AddTypeSecond() as T);
}
}
I see no good reason to do this - after all, you know the type of the list, just call the correct function for that list...
Instead of using Reflection, you could also use dynamic if you add some functions to each sub-type:
public class FirstType : Parent {
public FirstType MakeChild() {
return new FirstType();
}
}
public class SecondType : Parent {
public SecondType MakeChild() {
return new SecondType();
}
}
public static class Static<T> where T : new() {
public static dynamic Value = new T();
}
public static class Ext {
public static void AddInstance<T>(this List<T> aList) where T : new() {
aList.Add(Static<T>.Value.MakeChild());
}
}
Which you can call like
var list1 = new List<FirstType>();
list1.AddInstance();

how to add object directly to nested ienumerable collection object group by Error- Cannot convert List to Collection

Hi I have created few nested iEnumerable implemented classes.
CDSWorkflowCollection
CDSModuleCollection
CDSSystemCollection
Below are my Classes
public class cdssystems
{
public string cdsSystemName;
public CDSModuleCollection listModules;
}
public class cdsmodules
{
public string moduleName;
public CDSWorkflowCollection listWorkflows;
}
class cdsdelgate
{
private string delgateName;
private DateTime fromDate;
private DateTime toDate;
private string functionElement;
private CDSSystemCollection cdsSystemsList;
private string cdsComments;
private string JobTitle;
}
public class cdsworkflows
{
public string WorkflowName;
public string ActionGroup;
}
class CDSWorkflowCollection : ICollection, IEnumerable<cdsworkflows>
{
private List<cdsworkflows> cdsWorkflowList;
private readonly object syncObject = new object();
public CDSWorkflowCollection(IEnumerable<cdsworkflows> cdsWorkflowList)
: base()
{
this.cdsWorkflowList = new List<cdsworkflows>(cdsWorkflowList);
}
public IEnumerator<cdsworkflows> GetEnumerator()
{
return this.cdsWorkflowList.GetEnumerator();
}
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return this.cdsWorkflowList.GetEnumerator();
}
public void CopyTo(Array array, int index)
{
if ((array.Rank != 1) || ((this.Count + index) > array.Length))
{
throw new ArgumentException();
}
int count = 0;
foreach (cdsworkflows cssWorkflow in this.cdsWorkflowList)
{
array.SetValue(cssWorkflow, count++);
}
}
public int Count
{
get
{
return this.cdsWorkflowList.Count;
}
}
public bool IsSynchronized
{
get
{
return false;
}
}
public object SyncRoot
{
get
{
return this.syncObject;
}
}
}
class CDSSystemCollection : ICollection, IEnumerable<cdssystems>
{
private List<cdssystems> cdsSystemList;
private readonly object syncObject = new object();
public CDSSystemCollection(IEnumerable<cdssystems> cdsSystemList)
: base()
{
this.cdsSystemList = new List<cdssystems>(cdsSystemList);
}
//Rest of the code here
}
class CDSDelegateCollection : ICollection, IEnumerable<cdsdelgate>
{
private List<cdsdelgate> cdsDelegateist;
private readonly object syncObject = new object();
public CDSDelegateCollection(IEnumerable<cdsdelgate> cdsDelegateList)
: base()
{
this.cdsDelegateist = new List<cdsdelgate>(cdsDelegateList);
}
//Rest of the code here
}
No i want to add objects to the class using group by and my code goes like below
var results = (from SPListItem item in myItemsList
group item by item["Systems"]
into grp
select new cdssystems()
{
cdsSystemName = grp.Key.ToString(),
listModules = (from item in grp
group item by item["Modules"]
into grpModules
select new cdsmodules()
{
moduleName = grpModules.Key.ToString(),
listWorkflows = (from item in grpModules
group item by item["Workflows"]
into grpWorkflows
select new cdsworkflows()
{
WorkflowName = grpWorkflows.Key.ToString(),
ActionGroup = grpWorkflows.FirstOrDefault()["ActionGroup"].ToString()
}
).ToList()
}).ToList()
}).ToList();
I am getting Error in ToList() saying
Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Collections.Generic.List' to 'CDS.BusinessObjects.CDSWorkflowCollection'
I know the parm expects a collection and i am passing List. How to pass the collection. Please help

Delete your custom collection types and use the Generic ones from the .net framework instead. You can use List<T>, IList<T>, or ICollection<T>. There is almost never a need to write your own collection implementation(s).
public class cdsmodules
{
public string moduleName;
public CDSWorkflowCollection listWorkflows;
}
becomes
public class cdsmodules
{
public string moduleName { get; set; }
public List<cdsworkflows> listWorkflows { get; set; }
}
You should also follow proper visibility guidelines by never exposing fields directly. Instead use a property with a get;set; accessor. Fields should almost always be scoped as private or protected.

Populating combobox with two different objects

I want to populate a combobox with two different objects using an interface. This is what I currently got. This works but now I would like to have a display member and value member for each object, how would I do so?
In Controller.cs
public List<IMusic> Populate()
{
List<IMusic> newList = new List<IMusic>();
foreach(Track t in tr.GetAllTracks()){
newList.Add(t);
}
foreach (Artist a in ar.GetAllArtists())
{
newList.Add(a);
}
return newList;
}
IMusic.cs
interface IMusic
{
}
The combobox with DataSource:
cBMainScreen_Search.DataSource = controller.Populate();
GetAllTracks() :
public List<Track> GetAllTracks()
{
return db.Track.ToList();
}
GetAllArtists() :
public List<Artist> GetAllArtists()
{
return db.Artist.ToList();
}

Just setup some properties in your interface:
interface IMusic
{
string Display { get; set; }
string Value { get; set; }
}
Then in your Track class (which should implement IMusic):
public string Display
{
get
{
return this.TrackName;
}
set
{
this.TrackName= value;
}
}
public string Value
{
get
{
return this.TrackID;
}
set
{
this.TrackID= value;
}
}
And in your Artist class (also implements IMusic):
public string Display
{
get
{
return this.ArtistName;
}
set
{
this.ArtistName= value;
}
}
public string Value
{
get
{
return this.AritstID;
}
set
{
this.AritstID= value;
}
}

Raise event from Inner class to outer class in c#

I'm using MVVM pattern in my project.
My class design is like this:
Class Model : AbstractModel
{
InnerClass Iclass = new InnerClass();
Public String ModelProp1
{
get
{
return Iclass.prop1;
}
set
{
Iclass.prop1 = value;
}
}
public override void SetLabel(UInt16 value, int Index)
{
byte[] arr = BitConverter.GetBytes(value);
this.Iclass.IclassConfig[Index].Label = arr[0];
}
public override string DateFormat
{
get { return Iclass.intlDate.ToString(); }
set { Iclass.intlDate = Convert.ToByte(value); }
}
}
Class InnerClass
{
public byte intlDate
{
get { return this.intl_date; }
set { this.intl_date = value;
RaiseModelPropertiesChangedEvent(new ValueChangedEventArgs { Parameter_dateformat = this.intlDate });
}
private JClassa []channel_config = new JClass[2];
public JClass[] IclassConfig
{
get { return this.channel_config; }
set { this.channel_config = value; }
}
}
Public JClass
{
private byte channel_label;
public byte Label
{
get { return this.channel_label; }
set { this.channel_label = value;}
}
I'm getting data from other application. updated data is coming in InnerClass property from there I want to push this updated data to Model class.
Problem is coming for JClass property how can I fire event such that It will push updated data to model class.
For this I have created Event in InnerClass like this:
public event EventHandler<ValueChangedEventArgs> ModelPropertiesChanged;
public void RaiseModelPropertiesChangedEvent(ValueChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (ModelPropertiesChanged != null)
ModelPropertiesChanged(this, e);
}
public class ValueChangedEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public int Parameter_dateformat { get; set; }
public int Parameter_channelLabel { get; set; }
}
Tell me how Can I achieve this. Becuase I have 4 property in Jclass and 6 Property is InnerClass.

I would add event triggers in the setter of your inner class properties. Then in the Constructor of your parent class, move the IClass = new InnerClass() into your constructor and attach your event listeners.
Since you're MVVM you could leverage INotifyPropertyChanged, but heat will get messy in the long run.
Better to have a 'PropertyName'Changed event for each property you want to notify to the parent class.

Caliburn Micro : passing Object between ViewModel

I'm developing a simple Crud Application (a windows 8.1 store application) using Caliburn Micro 2.0.0-alpha2
I'm in trouble with navigation between viewmodels, passing object.
I read many times the solution proposed by
Anders Gustafsson (How to pass parameter to navigated view model with WinRT Caliburn.Micro?)
and i tried to adapt it to my scope.
But the object is alwais null.
I need to pass a single object selected from a listView to my crudPage.
The crudPage is composed by an userControl that shown the FormView.
So i want to initialize this Form, with the values of the passed object.
I think that the problem is that the "Parameter" is initialized only after the ViewModel is created, but i don't know how to fix that problem.
There is my code, according with the idea of Anders Gustafsson
TransporterListViewModel (a list of Transporters from Database)
public class TransporterListViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
public string Title { get; set; }
public TransporterListViewModel(INavigationService navigationService)
: base(navigationService)
{
LoadData();
}
public async void LoadData() {
_transporters = await TransporterService.GetAll();
}
private BindableCollection<Transporter> _transporters;
public BindableCollection<Transporter> Transporters
{
get
{
return this._transporters;
}
set
{
this._transporters = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => this.Transporters);
}
}
private Transporter _selectedItem;
public Transporter SelectedItem
{
get
{
return _selectedItem;
}
set
{
_selectedItem = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => this.SelectedItem);
navigationService.Navigated += NavigationServiceOnNavigated;
navigationService.NavigateToViewModel<TransporterCrudPageViewModel>(_selectedItem;);
navigationService.Navigated -= NavigationServiceOnNavigated;
}
}
private static void NavigationServiceOnNavigated(object sender, NavigationEventArgs args)
{
FrameworkElement view;
TransporterCrudPageViewModel transporterCrudPageViewModel;
if ((view = args.Content as FrameworkElement) == null ||
(transporterCrudPageViewModel = view.DataContext as TransporterCrudPageViewModel) == null) return;
transporterCrudPageViewModel.InitializeTransporterForm(args.Parameter as Transporter);
}
TransporterCrudViewModel (the page that cointains the UserControl to initialize)
public class TransporterCrudPageViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
public string Title { get; set; }
public Transporter Parameter { get; set; }
public TransporterFormViewModel TransporterFormVM { get; set; }
public async void InitializeTransporterForm(Transporter enumerable)
{
TransporterFormVM = new TransporterFormViewModel(navigationService, enumerable);
await SetUpForm(enumerable);
}
public async Task SetUpForm(Transporter t){
TransporterFormVM.trName = t.trName;
TransporterFormVM.trUrl = t.trUrl;
}
public TransporterCrudPageViewModel(INavigationService navigationService)
: base(navigationService)
{
Title = "TransporterCrud Page";
//this.navigationService = navigationService;
this.InitializeTransporterForm(Parameter);
}
TransporterFormViewModel (the userContol to initialize)
public class TransporterFormViewModel :ViewModelBase
{
public string Title { get; set; }
public Transporter Transporter { get; set; }
public TransporterFormViewModel(INavigationService navigationService,Transporter trans)
: base(navigationService)
{
Transporter = trans;
}
private string _trName;
public string trName
{
get
{
return _trName;
}
set
{
_trName = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => trName);
}
}
public string trCode { get; set; }
public string trUrl { get; set; }
public int trId { get; set; }

In the constructor TransporterCrudViewModel class you have:
this.InitializeTransporterForm(Parameter);
where Parameter is a property of type Transporter not initialized and you will call the method InitializeTransporterForm with a null parameter. Then you'll call SetUpForm method with a null value of the parameter Transporter t. I think you should initialize in some way this property.
Then, supposing you're continuing in your TransporterListViewModel class with this:
transporterCrudPageViewModel.InitializeTransporterForm(args.Parameter as Transporter);
in the method InitializeTransporterForm, you don't set the passed parameter as value of the property Parameter with something like this:
public async void InitializeTransporterForm(Transporter enumerable)
{
TransporterFormVM = new TransporterFormViewModel(navigationService, enumerable);
this.Parameter = enumerable; //setting the Parameter property..
await SetUpForm(enumerable);
}
Beside these notes, you should put a breakpoint with your IDE in the line
transporterCrudPageViewModel.InitializeTransporterForm(args.Parameter as Transporter);
Make sure that the property Parameter of the NavigationEventArgs object is not null.