About HttpWebRequest's EndGetResponse - c#

I'm using asynchronous calls for communication to my server. I written some component to collect all unauthorized requests and to resend them after user logs in. I written some test to produce 10 threads that are sending some requests without first being authorized. Than I wait for 20 seconds and do authorization and after that I wait for request to successfully finish. But problem appeared at EndGetResponse method which I call in my callback method. I done that this way:
public void InternalCallback(IAsyncResult result)
{
try
{
RequestState state = (RequestState)result.AsyncState;
IHttpWebRequest request = state.Request;
using (IHttpWebResponse response = responseGetter.GetResponse(request, result))
{
// ...
}
}
// ...
}
So, I made some custom class RequestState which has some higher level callbacks I need and it has request which I'll use to call EndGetResponse method. But this way I got error:
IAsyncResult object was not returned from the corresponding asynchronous method.
I changed this so I now have Request field in my callback class which I set before calling BeginGetResponse and I use that Request field when calling EndGetResponse in my callback.
public void InternalCallback(IAsyncResult result)
{
try
{
using (IHttpWebResponse response = responseGetter.GetResponse(this.Request, result))
{
// ...
}
}
// ...
}
Is this new solution valid one? Can you suggest is this good way to do this or how should I do this?

Related

HttpClient throws httprequest exception on network restore

I am using System.Net.Http.HttpClient to make postaysnc request. While request is in progress I unplug the network cable, receive HttpRequestException.
After some time plug the network cable again and make the postasync request, getting the HttpRequestException - sometimes i get the response server not available,sometimes timeout
Do i need to dispose the httpclient on exception and recreate when the request is made? How to make the query successful on network restore.
private async Task<string> GetServerResult()
{
try
{
var response = await myHttpClient.PostAsync("https://google.com", httpContent);
response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();
}
catch (HttpRequestException ex)
{
throw new HttpRequestException(ex.Message, ex.InnerException);
}
}
As per your requirement, you have to change implement some sort of implementation in that case. My proposed solution is use to a caching mechanism at WCF Client and update it periodically.
The very simple implementation could be as: You have a very simple singleton class of and a periodic Timer fetches the data from your mentioned endpoint. It stores the last cached data so that you have a copy of the data and when the hits are failed you can configure a fallback mechanism for that. For instance you have an implementation like
//You single Cache class
public sealed class ClientCache
{
#region Singleton implementation
private static ClientCache _clientCache = new ClientCache();
private ClientCache()
{
}
public static ClientCache Instance => _clientCache;
#endregion
//Timer for syncing the data from Server
private Timer _timer;
//This data is the cached one
public string data = string.Empty;
internal void StartProcess()
{
//Initializing the timer
_timer = new Timer(TimeSpan.FromMinutes(1).TotalMilliseconds); //This timespan is configurable
//Assigning it an elapsed time event
_timer.Elapsed += async (e, args) => await SyncServerData(e, args);
//Starting the timer
_timer.Start();
}
//In this method you will request your server and fetch the latest copy of the data
//In case of failure you can maintain the history of the last disconnected server
private async Task ProcessingMethod(object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e)
{
//First we will stop the timer so that any other hit don't come in the mean while
timer.Stop();
//Call your api here
//Once the hit is completed or failed
//On Success you will be updating the Data object
//data = result from your api call
//Finally start the time again as
timer.Start();
}
}
Now coming to Step two where to initialize the ClientCache Class. The best options are to initialize it in Global.asax class
protected void Application_Start()
{
//As
ClientCache.Instance.StartProcess();
}
Now whenever your frontend calls the method you don't need to go back to the server. Just send back the result from your cache as:
private Task<string> GetServerResult()
{
return Task.FromResult(ClientCache.Instance.data);
}

Prevent GC from disposing a WebSocket when the task is finished running?

I'm trying to maintain a list of WebSockets for a server which only needs to send messages to the client and not receive any replies. When the WebSocket is created initially all I want to do is just add the socket reference to a list for later use.
...
static Dictionary<int,WebSocket> wsDict = new Dictionary<int,WebSocket>();
...
private Task ProcessWS(AspNetWebSocketContext context)
{
wsDict[id] = (context.WebSocket);
...
}
(Finishes running the method and returns)
The issue I'm having is that I believe GC is disposing of the WebSocket, so when I try to use it at a later time I receive 'System.ObjectDisposedException'. Is there any way of permanently stopping GC from disposing of the socket?
Edit:
Sorry for not being clear originally, the whole class which inherits ApiController is (as the name suggests) is a control. A client initiates the WebSocket via a GET request and it calls the method above where it tries to store the socket into a dictionary (mapped to a int). The dictionary itself is Static.
It saves it into the Dict fine and in the debugger everything looks great. Its just literally disposing it after ProccessWS is complete and I can't seem to find a way to stop it. If I add a loop/sleep timer to the bottom of the ProcessWS it works fine - but thats not a viable solution.
The is a problem which originally I wasn't sure if it would be possible as each of the REST calls are stateless yet I need to maintain and overall list of all the connections which seems to contradict the original statement.
You have to await reads while the WS is still connected:
public class WSHandler : IHttpHandler
{
public bool IsReusable { get { return false; } }
public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
{
if (context.IsWebSocketRequest)
{
context.AcceptWebSocketRequest(ProcessWS);
}
}
private async Task ProcessWS(AspNetWebSocketContext context)
{
WebSocket socket = context.WebSocket;
...
while (socket.State == WebSocketState.Open)
{
WebSocketReceiveResult result = await socket.ReceiveAsync(buffer, CancellationToken.None)
.ConfigureAwait(false);
...
}
}
}

Multithreaded loop with rabbitMQ consumer and WebApi call - WebApi response never returned

I've got a multithreaded Windows service which is consuming messages off a Rabbit queue and sending emails based on the content of the messages.
When the rabbit client is initialized at startup, it limits the Threadpool threads with a Min and Max value.
For each message taken off the queue the service is sending an HTTP request to a web api service using HttpClient GetAsync method to retrieve email address.
The problem is that the request goes off to the data service, but the response never comes back. The windows service keeps consuming messages off the queue and hangs after a while (probably runs of of free threads) - it's waiting for any of the calls to web api to complete which they never do.
I was able to resolve the problem using a Semaphore class for the Rabbit loop rather than trying to limit the Threadpool directly, however, I'd like to know why the service got into this state in the first place. Is that to do with the GetAsync call? Is it perhaps freeing up the thread for the duration of the request, so that the main loop can steal it for a next request?
Any ideas?
The original loop:
while (!_stopped)
{
if (_paused) continue;
try
{
using (var messageBusReceiver = _rabbitQueueClient.ConfigureMessageBusReceiver())
{
using (_consumer = messageBusReceiver.Listen<PublishableItem>())
{
while (!_stopped)
{
if (_paused) continue;
_consumer.Consume(callback, consumeSynchronously: false);
_communicationErrorCount = 0;
}
}
}
}
The Consume method is eventually doing this:
_threadPoolProvider.QueueUserWorkItem(o =>
consumeMessage(callback, eventArgs, o), message);
The callback begins with the following lines - the null checking line is never reached:
var foo = _fooService.GetFoo(messageInfo.FooId);
if (foo == null)
{
throw new FooNotFoundException(
String.Format(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, "Foo was not found for FooId of {0}", messageInfo.FooId));
}
The client method:
public Foo GetFoo(Guid id)
{
var path = getPathWithQueryStringAndDebug("getfoo", "id", id.ToString());
var response = _client.GetAsync(path).Result;
return processResponse<FooDto>(response);
}

Using Lock to stop concurrent executions is not working?

I have an API in which i do a lot of processing like sending a service bus queue message and receiving it, adding entries to table and then finally send an event to socket.io server. I want all this to be protected by concurrent executions. I am using Lock, but it doesnt seem to do the trick. Am i missing anything? below is my code
public class BroadcastController : ApiController
{
private readonly Object _Lock = new Object();
[HttpPost]
[ActionName("UploadRecording")]
public async Task<HttpResponseMessage> UploadRecording()
{
// Check if the request contains multipart/form-data.
if (!Request.Content.IsMimeMultipartContent())
{
throw new HttpResponseException(HttpStatusCode.UnsupportedMediaType);
}
string path = Path.GetTempPath();
var provider = new MultipartFormDataStreamProvider(path);
// Read the form data and return an async task.
var response = await Request.Content.ReadAsMultipartAsync(provider);
// processing the mime content
lock (_Lock)
{
// sending and receiving service bus messages
// adding records to table
// sending an event to socket.io
return Request.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK, new ResponseMessage<PersistedAudioRecord> { SuccessCode = 1, Message = "Broadcast Uploaded", Data = updatedRecord });
} } }
Make the _Lock object static. Otherwise, you are using a different lock for each instance of the controller. Since the framework creates a new instance of the controller to process each request, each request is locking on a different _Lock object, thus providing no concurrency safety.
However, note that even a static lock object will only work if you have a single server. If you have multiple servers handling requests you'll need to manage concurrency by another means.

A method for making HTTP requests on Unity iOS?

I need to send HTTP requests with all the standard RESTful methods and access to the body of the request in order to send/receive JSON with it. I've looked into,
WebRequest.HttpWebRequest
This works almost perfectly, but there are cases where, for example, if the server is down the function GetResponse can take several seconds to return- since it is a synchronous method- freezing the application for that period. The asynchronous version of this method, BeginGetResponse, does not seem to work asynchronously (in Unity anyway) as it still freezes the application for that period.
UnityEngine.WWW#
Only supports POST and GET requests for some reason- but I also need PUT and DELETE (standard RESTful methods) so I didn't bother looking into it any further.
System.Threading
In order to run WebRequest.HttpWebRequest.GetResponse without freezing the application I looked into using threads. Threads seem to work in the editor (but seem extremely volatile- if you don't stop a thread when the application exits it keeps running in the editor forever even when you stop it), and when built to an iOS device crash it as soon as I try to start a thread (I forgot to write down the error and I don't have access to it right now).
Run threads in a native iOS app with a bridge to the Unity app
Ridiculous, not even going to attempt this.
UniWeb
This. I would like to know how they managed it.
Here is an example of the WebRequest.BeginGetResponse method I am trying,
// The RequestState class passes data across async calls.
public class RequestState
{
const int BufferSize = 1024;
public StringBuilder RequestData;
public byte[] BufferRead;
public WebRequest Request;
public Stream ResponseStream;
// Create Decoder for appropriate enconding type.
public Decoder StreamDecode = Encoding.UTF8.GetDecoder();
public RequestState()
{
BufferRead = new byte[BufferSize];
RequestData = new StringBuilder(String.Empty);
Request = null;
ResponseStream = null;
}
}
public class WebRequester
{
private void ExecuteRequest()
{
RequestState requestState = new RequestState();
WebRequest request = WebRequest.Create("mysite");
request.BeginGetResponse(new AsyncCallback(Callback), requestState);
}
private void Callback(IAsyncResult ar)
{
// Get the RequestState object from the async result.
RequestState rs = (RequestState) ar.AsyncState;
// Get the WebRequest from RequestState.
WebRequest req = rs.Request;
// Call EndGetResponse, which produces the WebResponse object
// that came from the request issued above.
WebResponse resp = req.EndGetResponse(ar);
}
}
... based on this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/86wf6409(v=vs.71).aspx
Ok, I finally managed to write my own solution. We basically need a RequestState, a Callback Method and a TimeOut Thread. Here I'll just copy what was done in UnifyCommunity (now called unity3d wiki). This is outdated code, but smaller than what's there, so more convenient to show something here. Now I've removed (in the unit3d wiki) System.Action and static for performance and simplicity:
Usage
static public ThisClass Instance;
void Awake () {
Instance = GetComponent<ThisClass>();
}
static private IEnumerator CheckAvailabilityNow () {
bool foundURL;
string checkThisURL = "http://www.example.com/index.html";
yield return Instance.StartCoroutine(
WebAsync.CheckForMissingURL(checkThisURL, value => foundURL = !value)
);
Debug.Log("Does "+ checkThisURL +" exist? "+ foundURL);
}
WebAsync.cs
using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Net;
using System.Threading;
using System.Collections;
using UnityEngine;
/// <summary>
/// The RequestState class passes data across async calls.
/// </summary>
public class RequestState
{
public WebRequest webRequest;
public string errorMessage;
public RequestState ()
{
webRequest = null;
errorMessage = null;
}
}
public class WebAsync {
const int TIMEOUT = 10; // seconds
/// <summary>
/// If the URLs returns 404 or connection is broken, it's missing. Else, we suppose it's fine.
/// </summary>
/// <param name='url'>
/// A fully formated URL.
/// </param>
/// <param name='result'>
/// This will bring 'true' if 404 or connection broken and 'false' for everything else.
/// Use it as this, where "value" is a System sintaxe:
/// value => your-bool-var = value
/// </param>
static public IEnumerator CheckForMissingURL (string url, System.Action<bool> result) {
result(false);
Uri httpSite = new Uri(url);
WebRequest webRequest = WebRequest.Create(httpSite);
// We need no more than HTTP's head
webRequest.Method = "HEAD";
RequestState requestState = new RequestState();
// Put the request into the state object so it can be passed around
requestState.webRequest = webRequest;
// Do the actual async call here
IAsyncResult asyncResult = (IAsyncResult) webRequest.BeginGetResponse(
new AsyncCallback(RespCallback), requestState);
// WebRequest timeout won't work in async calls, so we need this instead
ThreadPool.RegisterWaitForSingleObject(
asyncResult.AsyncWaitHandle,
new WaitOrTimerCallback(ScanTimeoutCallback),
requestState,
(TIMEOUT *1000), // obviously because this is in miliseconds
true
);
// Wait until the the call is completed
while (!asyncResult.IsCompleted) { yield return null; }
// Deal up with the results
if (requestState.errorMessage != null) {
if ( requestState.errorMessage.Contains("404") || requestState.errorMessage.Contains("NameResolutionFailure") ) {
result(true);
} else {
Debug.LogWarning("[WebAsync] Error trying to verify if URL '"+ url +"' exists: "+ requestState.errorMessage);
}
}
}
static private void RespCallback (IAsyncResult asyncResult) {
RequestState requestState = (RequestState) asyncResult.AsyncState;
WebRequest webRequest = requestState.webRequest;
try {
webRequest.EndGetResponse(asyncResult);
} catch (WebException webException) {
requestState.errorMessage = webException.Message;
}
}
static private void ScanTimeoutCallback (object state, bool timedOut) {
if (timedOut) {
RequestState requestState = (RequestState)state;
if (requestState != null)
requestState.webRequest.Abort();
} else {
RegisteredWaitHandle registeredWaitHandle = (RegisteredWaitHandle)state;
if (registeredWaitHandle != null)
registeredWaitHandle.Unregister(null);
}
}
}
I got threading to work on iOS- I believe it was crashing due to ghost threads or something. Restarting the device seems to have fixed the crashing so I'll just use WebRequest.HttpWebRequest with threads.
There is a way of doing this asynchronously, without using IEnumerator and yield return stuff. Check out the eDriven framework.
HttpConnector class: https://github.com/dkozar/eDriven/blob/master/eDriven.Networking/Rpc/Core/HttpConnector.cs
I've been using JsonFX with HttpConnector all the time, for instance in this WebPlayer demo: http://edrivenunity.com/load-images
Not having PUT and DELETE is not a big issue, since all of it could be done using GET and POST. For instance I'm successfully communicating with Drupal CMS using its REST service.
// javascript in the web player not ios, android or desktop you could just run the following code:
var jscall:String;
jscall="var reqScript = document.createElement('script');";
jscall+="reqScript.src = 'synchmanager_secure2.jsp?userid="+uid+"&token="+access_token+"&rnd='+Math.random()*777;";
jscall+="document.body.appendChild(reqScript);";
Application.ExternalEval(jscall);
// cs
string jscall;
jscall="var reqScript = document.createElement('script');";
jscall+="reqScript.src = 'synchmanager_secure2.jsp?userid="+uid+"&token="+access_token+"&rnd='+Math.random()*777;";
jscall+="document.body.appendChild(reqScript);";
Application.ExternalEval(jscall);
// then update your object using the your return in a function like this
// json return object always asynch
function sendMyReturn(args){
var unity=getUnity();
unity.SendMessage("object", "function", args );
}
sendMyReturn(args);
or you can send it via a AJAX function prewritten custom headers for security purposes
with this you would need signed headers and a signed request back from the server
I prefer md5 signatures comparatively they are not so big

Categories

Resources