I finished a project.I am trying create a setup .
My Problem is that :after I create setup project dll files that I used in project added to same folder with my .exe file like
ApplicationFolder(Folder)
Devexpress.Data.dll
Devexpress.Util..dll
.
.
project.exe
but I want to get it different folder.
like
ApplicationFolder(Folder)
MYDLLFILES(Folder)
project.exe(exe file)
how can I make this? Thanks a lot
This is not only a problem of setup. unless you are already handling this in the app.config and/or with appdomain.assemblyresolve event your application will not work at all on the user's machines once those required references will not be available in the same folder if the .exe file.
Surely you could isolate every single file and tell the setup project where to put it but your program has to be modifief to then look for those files in those other locations.
I accidentally faced this problem today, I want to add some separate dll files into the setup package (I have to do this because I can't add reference of these dll files into my C# program , these dll files are of 3rd-party software).
I did as following:
Right click on Setup Project > Add > Assembly and then browse to dll which I need, then press OK button.
These dll files will be included into Setup project, and will be packaged into setup file also.
Hth.
The problem is that Visual Studio setup projects will automatically include referenced DLLs for you so you won't be able to customize their location with these setup projects.
See also the following articles by DevExpress:
How to deploy WinForms applications on client machines
How to distribute applications which use Developer Express .NET Windows Forms controls
The second article explains how to register DLLs copied to a different location.
By the way we're also also deploying a big app using these VS setup projects and our base installation folder is full of DevExpress and other DLLs. I agree that it looks totally ugly and I'd also prefer a clean structure with a lib subfolder, but nobody cares about that. Customers don't start our application from the installation folder, they use the shortcuts.
Related
I've just finished my Windows Forms App project in Visual Studio using C#. I know I need to release it. To do so I need to go from Debug mode to Release above in VS and then just click on F6. After that I have a folder with an exe file in it. But in my project I use a dll library which was copied on my PC and registered by regsvr32.exe in cmd. Next in VS I went to Solution Explorer and added the library in References by writing the path to it. I also use two packages which were installed by NuGet Package Manager.
My program is developed to use it by my coworkers so I have to distribute it to them. The problem is that I don't know how to prepare my app for it.
I'm reading lots of different articles about the release step but I'm getting more confused. People usually write that I can just copy the exe file in the release folder and use it in another PC after installing .Net there. But in my project there are also the three libraries and without them my program won't work in another PC. I can copy and register the first library on other computers but what about the last two? How to set up them correctly?
About the first library, I put it in a folder created by me manually in the C directory of my computer. The release folder is in another place. And when registering this library in cmd and then adding it to References, I specified the path to it. It means if the path has been changed, it won't be possible to use the library in the project. I tried some times. It's not convenient and when placing the app in another PC without VS where I can specify the path, my program won't probably work. So it would be very convenient to place this library next to the release folder and after putting it in another PC, the path to the library wouldn't cause any problems.
To sum up, I'm looking for the way to easily and conveniently distribute my program to users. Of course, I want to put my app and the libraries together in a PC, not to set up them separately and then tune them separately to make the program work there. Might there a way to release it as an app with all the libraries connected to it?
I feel it must be easy but I'm not so experienced. I'm sorry for that.
It is recommended that you use ClickOnce deployment:
ClickOnce deployment is a Microsoft technology that allows you to easily deploy your Windows Forms App along with all its dependencies. With ClickOnce deployment, you can publish your application to a web server or a file share and users can install it by simply clicking on a link. ClickOnce will automatically download and install all the required DLLs and packages on the user's computer.
Of course, there are some third-party packaging software that I can't recommend. If ClickOnce doesn't help you, I'll think of other ways.
I am setting up an installer project for a C# solution and I encounter a dependency problem:
In my solution, I have 4 independent project outputs – one windows service and three executables, who all share between them some references.
I need the installer to install all four of them in order for the solution to work.
I've set up an installation folder for each project output under "Application folder" in the "File system on target machine" dialog, added the project output of the windows service successfully in its folder. But when I continue to try and add the executables' project outputs in their folders the assemblies already carried into the windows service folder are not carried into the executable folder, and following the installation the executables won't run as they are missing dependencies.
I can manually add the missing assemblies to the executables' folders, but it seems that this is not how it should be done and there's something I'm missing.
Any ideas?
Well you should create a new project in the solution, and set the "installer" to be the output of your main application (or main applications) it should solve the dependencies itself.
I was having what I think is the problem that was originally described. I have a Winform app and a console application as two separate projects, but a single setup project handles both.
Both the Winform app and the console app use the same two external assemblies: one not part of the solution (reference to a file in a folder), and the other from a C# class project (reference to the project).
What I have found is that the installer assumes that the project output is all combined into a single folder on the installation machine. Therefore, all of the common assemblies will also co-reside with the executables that need them. So if you add the project output from the first executable into the folder, that is why you see all its dependencies appear, and then when the second project output is added, only the assemblies not already added will appear.
It doesn't matter if you create subfolders under the Application folder, Visual Studio appears to treat the Application Folder as a whole unit... as far as Project Output (exe, dll and res) are concerned.
There are two ways to solve this. The first is to create a separate installation project for each executable. In a large project, this could be a lot of setup projects.
If you want to keep everything in a single installation, a better option is to use the GAC for the shared assemblies, which is described in another Stack Overflow article here: Use Visual Studio Setup Project to automatically register and GAC a COM Interop DLL
MSI can get the job done. Right-click "File System on Target Machine",
Add, GAC. Right-click that added folder, Add, Project Output. That
ensures the assembly is gac-ed.
The GAC is the better solution in my mind, because your assemblies are managed by the .NET layer if you later make changes and enhancements to them. One of the benefits of .NET is to eliminate the old "DLL hell" issues that were in Win 98 and previous versions of Windows. I highly recommend using it for your common code.
So I made a C# project in visual studio with 3 class library projects. Everything works fine when debugging but When I try to deploy. Database and Program installs just fine but when I try to open the Application, I get an Assembly or File not Found Exception. The DLL he can't find is a class library in my project.
On the File System Editor, VS automatically detected the dependencies and included the 3 dll files in to application directory. I tried excluding these dll's and just adding the class library projects's primary output's (Same dll) but still the same error.
I used a Custom Installer class for creating my database on installation. But I don't think that is relevant.
If you have verified that your 3 assemblies are indeed deployed to your destination folder,
it could very well be an another dependency that you have not included in your setup project.
Please double check that you indeed have the right number of assemblies included.
You can also right click the setup project and refresh dependencies.
Have you checked that dependencies in the setup project aren't excluded (by mistake)?
Furthermore, it may also be a .NET profile issue. Do you depend on assemblies that are only available in the full .NET profile, and your destination only has the client profile installed?
In worst case, run the SysInternals process monitor and that way figure out which assembly is missing.
you need to include all dll's that are not part of the .net framework with your deployable. Your custom installer will copy these files to the location of the executable on install.
i usually create a folder called /deploy and copy all my needed dlls in there. I also change my projects settings to output to the /deploy-directory (instead of bin/). after you build, this directory will contain all dll's and other resources needed to run the application.
My problem is that DLLs needed by my ClickOnce app are cluttering my project folder and I would like to move them to a bin folder but don't know a simple way to do so and still get the files to distribute.
To explain:
I'm distributing a C# app with ClickOnce. It has the following components:
One C# application
One CLR DLL
Umpteen C++ DLLs
All of these build to a tidy little bin folder.
Now the CLR DLL is referenced from the C# project, so it copies and deploys fine.
But I also want to distribute the C++ DLLs as part of the ClickOnce project, so I've done the thing that people say to do, which is add them to the C# project (drag ... drop), and in Properties, set Build Action to Content and Copy to Output Directory to Copy if Newer.
ClickOnce seems to deploy these files quite nicely.
The problem, though, is that now I have a bunch of binaries dumped into my C# project folder (and appearing in the project root in the IDE), which mixes executable files with source files in a way that is extremely obnoxious.
Can anyone clue me in to a simple way to keep all my DLLs in the output folder where they belong, and also have them distributed by ClickOnce?
Move you C++ DLLs somewhere sensible then when you add them to the project choose to add them as a Link instead of the standard Add which copies the files to the project folder.
To do this follow these steps:
Right click the project file and choose add existing file.
Navigate to the location of the file(s).
Click the down arrow next to the Add button and select Add as Link
I've created a basic console app in Visual Studio 2008, which references an external assembly.
When I publish and install the project, both the executable and the external assembly are installed in the target folder.
Is it possible to compile the project, and have all referenced assemblies included in the main executable - so there is only one file to distribute?
Thanks for any help,
Franko
You can use ILMerge to merge the assemblies for deployment. This lets you keep them separate during development, but put them all into one .exe file when you ship.
You can use ILMerge from Microsoft for this, or the Cecil tool from the Mono project.
You can create a setup file. so you can redistribute only one file.
But it still going to be installed into a folder with each assembly separated.
You can also consider placing your assemblies into the GAC.
If you find ILMerge is not enough because your app needs files other than .net assemblies, I have found that packaging it as self extracting exe using MakeSFX works nicely. It sounds unlikely but with correct command line flags the self extracting bit is completely transparent and it runs just like any other application.