I have a need to install an "agent" (I'm thinking it will run as a Windows Service) on many servers in my network. This agent will host a WCF service with several operations to perform specific tasks on the server. This I can handle.
The second part is to build a control center, where I can browse which servers are available (the agent will "register" themselves with my central database). Most of the servers will probably be running the most recent version of my service, but I'm sure there will be some servers which fail to update properly and may run an out dated version for some time (if I get it right, the service contract wont change much, so this shouldn't be a big deal).
Most of my WCF development has been Many Clients to a Single WCF Service, now I'm doing the reverse. How should I manage all of these EndPoints in my control center app? In the past, I've always had a single EndPoint mapped in my App.config. What would some code look like that builds a WCF EndPoint on the fly, based on say a set of string ip; int port; variables I read from my database?
This article has some code examples on how to create an end point on the fly:
http://en.csharp-online.net/WCF_Essentials%E2%80%94Programmatic_Endpoint_Configuration
WCF4 has a Discovery API built-in that might just do everything you need.
Related
Background
I have multiple servers that I currently connect to remotely to run a number of different commands/scripts to obtain information about the servers and/or applications running on the servers.
I'd like to automate running the commands/scripts (or the code contained in the scripts converted to C#/.NET) and have the server send alerts/notifications/messages to a client (basically a Windows Form) running on multiple workstations, but need some guidance.
For reference, I have limited experience creating Windows Services, but feel fairly confident in being able to create them on the server to handle to command/script automation, which I'm assuming would be the best way to go about handling the command/script automation on the server (since the commands/scripts would need to be run all the time or at set intervals).
Question
How can I connect multiple servers to multiple clients so that the server sends alerts/notifications/messages to the client when a command/script or even an event occurs on the server?
For instance, if an application on the server has a built-in command that can be run to determine the status of the application (up, down, limbo, etc.), I would like the Windows Form on the client to receive an alert from the server when the command returns "down" or "limbo" when it is run, presumably from a Windows Service. The alerts would be displayed on the Windows Form that would be setup basically as a dashboard for the servers that the client can connect to.
An even better outcome would be that the client runs as a background application and a notification appears similar to how Microsoft Outlook displays a notification when new email messages arrive (although these notifications would likely require user interaction to close instead of fading out like the Outlook notifications).
I would also like for the client to use a configuration file that has the connection information for the servers in it so that the servers being used can be changed quickly new servers are added or existing servers are decommissioned.
Research (so far)
I've read about WCF and duplex contracts, and how WCF can be hosted in Windows Services. From what I've read, this seems promising. However, I'm not quite sure how I would set this up so that the client can connect to a WCF service on multiple servers.
One thing that I'm concerned about with WCF is that in all of the WCF examples (which implement a calculator-type service) I've seen the client has to initiate the communication with the server in order to receive a message through a callback. In the calculator service examples, the client sends numbers to the service and the result is provided in the callback. I've also seen an asynchronous example, but in that example the client initiated a single, long running request and the callback returned a single response when it was finished processing.
And, just so I'm clear about bindings in WCF, it is possible to create and use bindings for multiple servers using a configuration file without having to use SvcUtil.exe to generate the code, correct? The reason I ask is because the servers that will be configured will likely be change for different users, so the client needs to be flexible when connecting to the services.
I've just now started looking at Sockets, but I'm not familiar enough with them to know if this would be the better option to achieve my objective.
Summary
I'm just looking for guidance, so if you can help direct me to some resources that will help me achieve my objective, I would appreciate it. I've searched extensively, but the majority of my searching either doesn't apply to my scenario, it is limited to a single server/client interaction, or it is limited to a single server with multiple clients.
Since I'm not sure what direction to go in, I don't have any code examples, although I have implemented the examples in the following Microsoft article: Windows Communication Foundation - Getting Started Tutorial
So you want to build a system of
multiple servers which execute commands on the computer they are running on
multiple clients which will receive the status of the commands executed on server or such information from the server
This would be my advice
Servers can be implemented as windows service. You will be able to administrate them easily this way using the services console or the scm. Checkout this link for a creating a simple C# service How do you write and use a Windows Service in C#?
Also, you can set the service to run as an in-built service user with different levels of permissions in addition to regular user accounts.
I have not used WCF, but usually clients connect to the server; this is a pretty common model, and hence all samples are such. Initiating connection from server is not a big deal (at least in a socket program), but just a bad model. You have to ask yourself, if no client is connected to your servers, how can they relay a status to the end user. You have to think clearly about the communication model. I would suggest a central repository of messages. It can be a file on a shared file system or a database or any such entity which can act as a data repository. This way all servers can convey there messages without caring if a client is connected or not. You can use Sockets to achieve what you want to do. Check the asychronous socket server sample from MSDN to understand how to do it.
Making the client run in the background and just have a notification area icon is also easy in c#. You can use NotifyIcon Class for that. This CodeProject article (Formless System Tray Application) demonstrates its usage. To show notification a la outlook style, you can refer to the following post: How to create form popup from from system tray on windows application (not web) with c#. Look at not only the accepted answer but other answers too; there are lot of useful links in it.
So far we have windows service talking over sockets, storing messages in a central repository and capable of handling multiple clients with toast style pops for client side notification.
You need a far richer client side GUI so the end users can take actions on the messages sent from the server. You can maintain a list of servers in app.config for the client that the client connects on startup. You should to provide a GUI for users to manage all servers and their connections.
Lat but not least, by building such a client server model, you are effectively building a security loophole in your systems. You should implement a good authorization mechanism. Checkout the following post: Authenticate user in WinForms (Nothing to do with ASP.Net)
EDIT:
You can also implement your server to accept "custom command" when you implement it as a service. This way, your client server communication will be standardized by using ServiceController to pass the command. This post might help: How to send a custom command to a .NET windows Service from .NET code?.
Don't get confused in the "command" terminology here. ServiceController issues standard commands to a service for start, stop, pause, resume and restart the service. These are the same items you see on the context menu when you right click a service in the services.msc snap-in. The same way a service can respond to custom commands. In your case the custom command maybe a request to execute a process.
Note that some mechanisms I have described are geared towards an intranet setup while others scale fine on both intranet and internet
I have two applications using the same wcf service instance. These two applications will always be started in pairs, so I can have a second, third, or fourth instance of these two. Does this mean I need to have one wcf service being hosted by say a Windows Service, IIS, or console app using a common endpoint address for all four of the instance pairs? Or if I dynamically hardcode the endpoint addresses such that each individual pair has it's own and self host in one of the two applications, does that mean each pair has access to it's own service?
I could probably benchtop test this, but I figure someone with experience could save me quite a bit of coding time just trying to figure it out.
Update (for clarity):
The reason for this question is due to the particular situation I'm working with. The scenario is that the two applications involve one client exe that I am developing and a third-party exe that I have no control over. I can develop a dll that the third-party exe can load. Between my third-party app dll and the client exe the WCF service is intended to bridge the process space to allow the two to communicate transaction information. This will allow the client exe to control the third-party exe and the files it manages.
This is partly an answer partly a long comment. :)
One way to think of a WCF service is that it passes messages back and forth between two separate applications. At a very general level, although there are plenty of good reasons to make a stateful service, it is generally accepted that it is better to be stateless. This means that each time you call it you pass all the info it needs to do what it does, and the service does not need to remember what was done earlier.
The fact that you are worried about separate instances suggests to me that your service has state. I do not think multiple endpoints is the way to go for your situation.
I would suggest that when an application "pair" starts up the first thing it could do would be to request a unique ID from the service. From that point on all messages to the service would contain this ID and the service would process them accordingly. If the service application is maintaining state it would use this ID as a key to identify what information to access to process the call.
At this point you end up with One service application on one server and multiple client applications which is how most WCF systems are designed.
Updated, I think you should google "WCF: Instance Management Per-Call and Per-Session"
Your client should be able to open a connection from the client and keep it open. WCF will automagically create a new instance on the server for you. This would mean you don't need the "application pair ID" but you would need to keep the session open.
I am a newbie developer to WCF and Windows services. I do know c#. The scenario requires various custom applications running on Windows 7 to call methods in another application. It is a client/server relationship, all running on the same computer. The server must be able to notify each client (one at a time) when a specified condition occurs.
I need to develop the server code only.
Would the following be an acceptable solution:
Make the server a windows service that uses WCF. The server could notify the clients by using a different named pipe for each client ?
Thank you...any suggestions would be appreciated.
Just use duplex communication over tcp/named pipes/msmq/http (WSDualHttpBinding) channel.
AFAIK you need two ports (in/out) for duplex over http
I would ditch wcf altogether. Although as Brian says, you can use the duplex bindings, these are complicated at best.
If it's all going to run on the same computer, why do you even need client/server? Just build a single client which does everything you need.
That is a acceptable solution and should work fine.
Other option for consideration (in the spirit of learning) is creating a Routing Service as an intermediary service which spawns the calls to multiple services. So in your scenario, your client would call the routing service and the routing service will in turn call each of your service
The following link should provide more information on routing service...
[Routing Service][1]
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee517423.aspx
I need multiple clients that talk to a WCF service. The WCF service also must be able to connect to any one of the clients also.
So - it sounds like the server and the clients need to have both a WCF server and client built into each one.
Is this correct or is there some way to do this?
I was looking at NetPeerTcpBinding, but that is obsolete. To be fair I'm not sure if that is a valid solution either.
Background:
I plan to have a Windows service installed on hundreds of machines in our network with a WCF service and a WCF client built in.
I will have one Windows service installed on a server with a WCF service and a client built in.
I will have a Windows Forms application
I will have a database
The clients on the network will connect to the service running on the server in order to insert some information on the database.
The user will use the Windows Forms application to connect to the Windows service on the server and this Windows service will connect to the relevant client on the factory floor (to allow remote browsing of files and folders).
Hence I believe the machines on the floor and the server both require a WCF cleint and service built in.
The reason people are recommending wsHttpDualBinding is because it is in itself a secure and interoperable binding that is designed for use with duplex service contracts that allows both services and clients to send and receive messages.
The type of communication mentioned 'duplex' has several variations. Half and Full are the simplest.
Half Duplex: Works like a walkie-talkie, one person may speak at any given time.
Full Duplex: Like a phone, any person may speak at any given time.
Each will introduce a benefit and a problem, they also provide ways to build this communication more effectively based upon your needs.
I'm slightly confused, but I'll attempt to clarify.
You have an assortment of approaches that may occur here, a Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) Service requires the following:
Address
Binding
Contract
Those are essentially the "ABC's" for WCF. The creation of those depicts a picture like this:
As you can see the Service will contain:
Host
Service
Client
The host houses the service which the client will consume so those service methods perform a desired task. An example representation:
As you see Client-1 is going through the Internet (HTTP, HTTPS, etc.) then will hit the Host, which will have the service perform those tasks.
Now Client-n is consuming the service locally, so it is talking over (TCP, etc.) as an example.
The easiest way to remember: One service can be consumed by however many clients require those methods to perform a task. You can create very complex models using a service-oriented architecture (SOA).
All WCF is, is a mean to connect your application to a host or
centralized location you may not have access to.
As you can see in the above image, the Client communicates through a Service to the Host. Which performs a series of task. WCF will talk over an array of protocols. Hopefully this will provide a better understanding of how WCF is structured.
There are a lot of tutorials and even post to get you started. Some excellent books such as "WCF Step by Step".
Essentially your looking for an asynchronous full duplex connection, or a synchronous full duplex service. As mentioned above, your task in essence is the point of a Service.
The question: How does this work best?
It will boil down to your design. There are limitations and structures that you will need to adhere to to truly optimize it for your goal.
Such obstacles may be:
Server Load
Communication Path
Security
Multiple Clients Altering UI / Same Data
Etc.
The list continues and continues. I'd really look up tutorials or a few books on WCF. Here are a few:
WCF Step by Step
WCF Multi-Tier Development
WCF Service Development
They will help you work with the service structure to adhere to your desired goal.
Remember the "ABCs" for the most success with WCF.
Use wsDualHttpBinding if you want your service communicate with your clients.
Read WS Dual HTTP.
You might want to try out creating a WCF service using netTcpBinding. It will work for your requirements. You can use the article How to: Use netTcpBinding with Windows Authentication and Transport Security in WCF Calling from Windows Forms as a start:
Also, there are many examples included within the WCF Samples package which you can use.
we're working on a peer to peer comm software that would allow a number of grocery stores to sync their inventory with what we call "headquarters".
To so this, we're thinking WCF+WPF, and no IIS and web services. My experience with WCF is basically zero, so my question is whether a TCP comm solution using WCF would work. The data that's being transferred is quite limited, about 2MB for a compressed plain text file (so we're sending binary data!), and this is done once per day only. So bandwidth/load shouldn't be an issue here.
The idea at this point is to have a WCF "server" running at HQ. Stores make themselves known to that server and then send files back and forth (simliliar to a chat application).
What I'm not sure of: does every store need to have a WCF "server" (or endpoint)? How would the server (=HQ) send a file to one of the clients (=stores)? Every store can send a file to any other store, and the HQ, and every store can also "request" a file from any other store/HQ.
Two limitations: None of the machines/computers involved can run Windows server for budget reasons, and as stated before IIS is a no-go.
If you are only sending files back and forth, I might question whether or not WCF even makes any sense. Have you considered just using a file transfer protocol, like scp or sftp?
Every machine will have to accept connections and have a file drop location setup, and then yuor application will have to monitor that location for new files. I love WCF in general, but a file transfer protocol is going to have a leg up if that is all you want to do.
If you direct all of your traffic via the server then there's no reason why you couldn't achieve this with WCF. The server would host WCF services in IIS with the stores having a client that was able to upload and request files. With this method, stores would not be able to directly transfer fiels to each other, but they would have to do it via the main server, which would suit your needs if you don't have the budget for the other scenario.
If all transfers are made once per day, the requests for files would be made with each client requesting what files they require, followed by each client uploading any files that are required by the server or any other client. The final step would be the server distributing the required files to each client. Obviously, this is a simplified view of it, the actual process may require some more thinking.
You don't need to host WCF in IIS, but is there any particular reason you don't want to do that?
You can host WCF in a ServiceHost, but then you need to build, maintain and deploy a lot of server/service features that IIS provides for free, such as application process recycling, activation-based hosting, etc.
In any case, it almost sounds like you need peer to peer networking. You can do that with WCF using the NetPeerTcpBinding.
If you have an opportunity to redesign your application, I suggest you do. You can throw strings around in WCF but if you can create a data contract you can keep all your communication strongly typed.
If you have access to windows server 2008 then the new IIS can host your WCF even if it isn't using tcp. Otherwise you just need to write an application that opens a service host, which you would usually wrap into a windows service. But as #MArk Seemann pointed out, you get lots of freebies by running your service in IIS.
Don't have any experience with the PeerTcpBinding but I can tell you that the NetTcpBinding is nice and fast plus it comes with all sorts of goodies like encryption and authentication if you want it.