I have a VC2010 C# Solution, with a number of projects in it.
So for example, I have a web project, and I have a class library.
In the web.config file, I have a key in the <appSettings> section, e.g.
<add key="FileDirectory" value="G:\ftproot\sales" />
I have also added a key in the Web.Production.config file to reflect the file directory on the server.
So when I reference it in my web project (It's MVC) - I do so like this:
var FTPPath = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["FileDirectory"];
this works fine within my web project. However, I also need to reference this in the class library, which gets to my question - Is there a way to reference a key in the web.config file from another project, e.g. a class library, in the same solution??
All help is appreciated.
Thanks
Yes you can use exactly the same code. .Net will look up the configuration key in the config file of the application which started the app domain. A class library used by such an application will have access to it's config file.
class libraries do not have their own configuration. They use the configuration of which ever executable they are being used in.
This means that for you you should be able to use the same code, and it will read the setting from the config (assuming that it is there).
This is not always convenient though (for example if you write a .net based plugin for a MMC snap-in, as this means you have to modify the mmc.exe.config in the system folder.)
You might be better having a method to pass this required configuration setting into you library code. then in apps where you control the config you can just read it from there and pass it in, and in apps where you can't you can use another approach, like reading from the registry or from a manually read config file. Or have the best of both worlds and make it so you can pass it in, and if this is not done it attempts to read it from the default configuration.
This question has some more details on the pitfalls associated with dll configuration, but also has some techniques for doing it if you need to.
Related
I gone through lot of threads about this topic but did not get any solution.
First I created a windows application. In that I used app.config file to store some variables it worked properly. Then the application converted to class library. While extracting the varibles it gives only null values.
Any other option to get or set variables in config file in the class library
Thanks.
If you converted you code to some class library you have to remember that it will reuse web.config/app.config of an application, which references it. So I would suggest to add settings from "old" app.config to the configuration file of an application, which uses your library.
We can not use app.config or web.config in class library. Add app.config for Console/Windows application or web.config file for your web application which calls your class library then application will automatically takes and uses that configuration file.
In several C# projects I have been using an app.config file to pass various settings to my program, settings like connectionstrings, power levels etc.
However sometimes I have come in situations where the settings aren't updated as expected and I have concluded that I am not that well informed with the proper use of app.config file.
Example:
Replacing the .exe file with a new version (where settings are different) to the output directory without changing the exe.config, results in the program seeing the hard-coded settings and not the settings of the existing .exe.config
So my Questions are:
What is the exact role of exe.manifest file
Every time I create a new .exe do I have to paste in the output folder anything else except the .exe file?
Whats the difference in obtaining the setting value by: ConfigurationManager.'settingName'... rather than:
Properties.Settings.Default.'settingName'?
What is the role of app.config build action?
Sorry If I am asking too much in a single Question.
The app.config file is a file that gets a special treatment when running the associated application. If you executable is named MyApp.exe the app.config file should be named MyApp.exe.config. The role of the app.config build task is to copy the file named app.config in your project to MyApp.exe.config in the output directory.
.NET provides ways to read the contents of the file (it is in XML format) and various parts of .NET will look for different sections in this XML to provide configuration.
A widely used section is the settings section you refer to as Properties.Settings.Default. This section plays together with Visual Studio that provides an editor for application settings. The settings are accessed in the code by using a generated class. Adding a setting will add a property to this class and this property is initialized from a value in the app.config file.
In the Visual Studio editor you can set a value for the setting and you can think of this as a default value for the setting. However, if you overwrite the value in the app.config file the later will take precedence. This allows you to modify the app.config file after installation and rerun the application with a modified setting.
You can also access application settings the app.config file using other methods, but in my oppinion using the Visual Studio editor and the code generated class is the best way to do that.
I am not sure I fully understand the problem that you experience. If you update MyApp.exe and leave MyApp.exe.config intact you should not see a change in the settings used by the application (unless of course you have renamed or changed some settings).
The manifest file provides information about side-by-side assemblies and can be used to request elevated privileges among other things. This is not related to the app.config file.
There quite a few resources about that.
See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms229689%28v=vs.90%29.aspx
and the (better) overview: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/k4s6c3a0%28v=vs.110%29.aspx
app.config is a very powerful tool. It addresses many issue like versioning, migration, upgrading etc. but this requires some in-depth reading from the links above.
Maybe one thing you could do, if you want to copy only .exe file every time you build your app, is make a settings.ini or settings.txt file, put your parameters in this file (that are not secret of course) and read all your settings from there when you start your app.
You can put all your connection string logic in your login form if you have one...
I have the following projects:
MVC
Console application
Class library
Windows forms application
COM Library
All these applications need to use a single configuration file. As far as I understand, app.config files are for windows, console applications and class libraries when web.config are for the web projects.
The same configuration need to be accessible in all of these projects. I have read that it's suggested to use machine configuration file, but we won't always have access to that, therefore configuration files must reside within our solution.
I don't fully understand how the configuration files get build. Currently I wrote a simple project where I have the following:
Class library to store for serving configuration files. A have attempted to do this through reflection.
Windows application that should read the app.config from a class library.
When I execute the following code I expect to get a configuration file with test values:
_applicationSettings = ConfigurationManager.OpenExeConfiguration(
System.Reflection.Assembly.GetAssembly(typeof(WCSConfiguration)).Location
).AppSettings;
What I get instead is an empty application settings file.
Class library has the following App.config:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<configuration>
<appSettings>
<add key="TestTextKey" value="TestTextValue"/>
</appSettings>
</configuration>
I have tried using .GetExecutingAssembly() method which I expect to return an assembly of a code that's currently being executed. This didn't work, instead it has returned the assembly of a Windows application.
GetAssembly(type(WCSConfiguration)) has returned a right assembly, however, the configuration file was missing in the bin/debug directory.
I have a feeling that either I'm doing something fundamentally wrong or Microsoft hasn't made this flexible enough. I have also tried to search MSDN for explanation, but this hasn't been documented well IMO.
I have also left COM in bold because I'm not sure whether any config files would be available to COM library at all. Firstly I would like to get other projects to work.
I understand that this is a lot of information. Any help would be greately appreciated. Previously we have chosen to use registry, but this has turned out to be nasty, mainly because access to registry is not available in some scenarios. Additionally we now have multiple versions of the applications and switching between branches is a half an hour job :(
Thank you
Edit:
If I add the dll's config sections to app.config that means that these settings will be available only from that application. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Example that I have provided is a scaled down version. In total there are about ten windows applications, a single MVC project and range of class libraries all of which need to make a use of that configuration.
Configuration settings are mostly connection strings, lookup values that do not belong in the database and few other minor settings. Main concern at this point are the connection strings. There are few minor releases of the application where each release points to a different database.
What I'd like to get out of this is a good workable solution so that it can be posted online and other people who come across the same problem won't spend days of their time.
Morale of the story IMO:
Use both App.config and Web.config to store location of your own configuration file.
Write simple XML serializer to read/write config and DLL for serving the configuration.
COM objects are a long story and were implemented with a "hack", since neither App.config or Web.config are available in COM DLLs.
Note ConfigurationManager.OpenExeConfiguration needs to be passed the filename of the config file, not the executable.
You'll need to append .config to the path of the executable. To get the exe assembly use Assembly.GetEntryAssembly.
If you have configuration settings you want to share across multiple pieces of code that are not all in the same .NET Process, I would suggest:
Put them in their own myStuff.config.
In .NET code use ConfigurationManager.OpenExeConfiguration to open and access myStuff.config.
Non-.NET code will need to use an XML parser to load and read the settings. Unless you configuration structures are very complex this shouldn't be too hard to encapsulate.
Put the path to myStuff.config in the app.config of each application sharing this configuration for .NET applications. (Not non-.NET applications: depends on what works for that application.)
Another approach, where the configuration structure is the same but the settings are per-application would be a custom configuration section.
A couple of general points -- add the dll's config sections to the app.config file rather than relying on the dll's config file to get picked up; and app.config actually gets renamed to .exe.config on build, so you need to make sure a file of that name's available.
Also -- you're not constrained to using the default config loading mechanism to configure your application. You could create your own configuration classes and just use XML serialization to deserialize and configure at will.
I have a class library for which i want to have configuration file.
The purpose of the configuration file is to have the path and other parameters.
Also i wanted to use the Enterprise logging block in Class library.
Here is my scenario:
This is a Class library and will be deployed in GAC
Enterprise logging blocks uses app.Config.
My calling application which consumes the dll is BizTalk 2010.
I don't have permission to modify the BizTalk's application config file
What i am trying to achieve is:
My Dll needs to use a configuration file which has many configuration parameters
Also as i understand, I need app.config for Enterprise Logging
How can i achieve this?
Any ideas?
Cheers,
Karthik
The easiest way is to use the machine config. You also have the option to put your configuration in a separate file and then reference it from the machine config.
You can also set the values in code but that sorta defeats the purpose of using a config file to begin with.
Modify your class library to open and read config file from specific location.
Do you have access to the calling application's code?
If so, maybe you can explicitly load the config file as suggested by Marc_s's solution?
Just an idea.
I have a config file in my C# class library called MyLibrary.config, in vs 2008.
I created another project, say a simple console app, add reference by "Browsing" the MyLibrary.dll in the bin directory of the class library project, and when I compile, the MyLibrary.config is not including in the bin directory of the output in the console app.
How can I set it so I can include it when I reference the dll?
Cheers
You can't. Your console application is expecting to find a config file with prefix the same as the name as the console application (MyConsoleApplication.exe -> MyConsoleApplication.exe.config.).
In some situations you can share a config file by using the file attribute on the appSettings element:
<appSettings
file="path">
</appSettings>
Note that path is relative to the executing assembly.
As a side note, DLLs do not even use the config file that you've defined in the project. Again, configuration information is read from the a config file with prefix the same as the executing assembly. Thus, even when MyLibrary.dll tries to yank configuration information out of a config file, it will be reading the config file for the executing assembly, not MyLibrary.dll.config.
For more on how config files work, see MSDN.
The standard way to use a config file is to have it the same as the executable, adding a reference to a dll will not include its config file and as far as I know dll's don't load config files on their own, rather they rely on the executable that reference them.
Beyond not being able to do this, I would also advise against this approach.
Rather than trying to tighly couple your settings to the DLL library, consider more of a "Dependency Injection" type approach - i.e. where you pass in the value dependencies (i.e. settings) to the code you are calling (i.e. the library).
The advantage in this is you are not tied to a single method of storing settings. You can then use a database, different config file formats... even hard-coding. It also makes unit testing easier by removing the external file dependency.
There are different ways to implement this, however one example is to pass the configuration settings into the constructor of the class(s) that uses them.