Move baseclasses for MasterPage from MVC2 to MVC3 - c#

I am working on moving an application from MVC2 ASPX to MVC3 Razor, and is quite stuck moving a baseclass for more MasterPages in old MVC2 application.
The baseclass is used for automate include of css and js on pages in order to ease quickfix and debugging when developing application in local environment, but when running application in production environment it has to update and include single minimized css and js files delivered from a external CDN.
The code needs to know about the View file eg. "~/views/home/index.chtml" and/or the Layout file eg. "~/Views/DefaultNoLogon.Master" in order to include and handle css and js files correct.
I tried to implement own baseclass using the pageBaseType in Razor part of web.config, but it seems like it is executed both for View and Layout file, and I could not find a execution point where information about both View and Layout file is present. I also tried to implement the file logic using a HtmlHelper, but I can only access information about the View file and miss information for Layout file for View.
I don't want this kind of code to be implemented in Route, Controller or ViewModel since it should be related directly to generation of Views.
Any ideas how to get information about View and Layout files in MVC3 Razor app?

Well, never mind my question.
I redesigned my logic for automatic rendering of js and css files, which actually is more simple and works better. My Mvc3 Razor app is now capable to take all js and css files for a view (including css and js for all layoutpages) and render them into single minified files.
Works like a charm, and I guess it's more future proof than my old solution, unless Guthrie make fundamental changes in layoutpages and Html helpers in Mvc4 or later.

Related

How Can I use HTML Helper in asp.net? [duplicate]

I'm liking the Razor syntax that Microsoft has developed for inline coding in their WebMatrix product (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_WebMatrix).
Now that Visual Studio SP1 has RTM'd, is it possible (and/or planned) to enable the use of Razor syntax in ASP.NET Webforms?
We (the ASP.NET team) currently have no plans to support the WebForms page model using Razor syntax. Furthermore it is unlikely that we would ever seriously consider this as the models are too different to make the two work together.
You can use Razor pages without MVC; this is called ASP.Net WebPages.
Just add .CSHTML files to a normal ASP.Net 4.0 project.
I explained how this works in my blog.
You could possibly integrate it using the RazorEngine available from Codeplex. It allows you to process razor outside of MVC. Though you don't get all the features you get from the MVC version of Razor, such as #Html and #Url and others.
I dare say that Microsoft have considered it, but there is no official word on the subject. Since you are not supposed to have C# or VB code in the ASPX file, you have to wonder about the point of adding Razor support to Web Forms. The code behind would still be a (partial) class file. You wouldn't put Razor there any more than you would put it in a class file in Web Pages or MVC. And swapping Server Controls and all that good declarative stuff for Html Helpers removes one of the key reasons for going the Web Forms route, IMO.
This really isn't that difficult to do. Working on it right now. Grab RazorEngine from CodePlex. It lets you compile Razor cshtml/vbhtml files into a class at runtime.
You can then take that class, and use it from a ASP.Net server control, inside its Render method. This is a great way to get HTML out of the body of a server control. Much, much cleaner.
Now, you can also add some methods that you can invoke from Razor. For instance, add something like RenderChild. Additionally, you could set the Server Control itself as the Model available to Razor. You could then invoke into the server control. Including doing something like grabbing one of it's child controls and invoking Render.

Cannot access to physical HTML file

I'm migrate my old fashion asp.net MVC application to an angular application.
I've created a subset of .html files that contains templates that will provide the HTML code to build my angular components.
Problem
I want to put this html files inside the folder "Views" that already exists on my application. But when I try to access to .html files I receive the following message:
But if I put the .html files outside this folder I can access directly to them:
Questions
Can you tell me why this is happening?
There is anyway that I can access to html files inside the folder "Views"?
To make a long story short, the Views folder is a special folder that holds templates used by actions that are routed by ASP.NET MVC. Because of this, you cannot use it to hold files that are meant to be used directly.
I would suggest ditching the .NET Framework all together since you are going Angular.
If that is not an option or you would like to retain ASP.NET MVC functionality, then simply use another folder (like you have already done by moving the Templates folder to the root).
Try adding an explicit ignore in your RouteConfig
routes.IgnoreRoute("{file}.html");
That should prevent the default routing from taking effect
To make this work, I suggest you take the html markup in your html file and put it on a .cshtml view, that you will render using a GET action in the home controller for instance (as you would normaly do in the MVC pattern).
The other way to achieve this (which I don't recommend), is to add your html file to a deployable folder (like the js folder for javascript files), and than you can call your file using a direct link, however you will lose any capabilities of the MVC pattern this way.
Hope this helps.
As html files are working in views folder, Can you check the path i.e 'Editor/V2/Templates' after 'Views' folder whether it is correct?

VirtualPathProvider equivalent in ASP.NET 5/MVC6?

I'm looking at migration strategies for an ASP4/MVC4 application into ASP5/MVC6. Our current implementation relies on loading cshtml views as embedded resources from DLL's, and we use a VirtualPathProvider to find these cshtml files.
Unfortunately, HostingEnvironment.RegisterVirtualPathProvider seems to be gone from MVC6. The closest thing I can find is IEnvironment.WebRootFileProvider, which is an IFileProvider. So I coded up a test class to see if it would work, and unfortunately, the IFileProvider I coded up is never queried for CSHTML files. I get requests for all of the .JS, .CSS, etc files, but no .CSHTML's.
What I'm looking for here is the ability to hook into the razor engine and provide a CSHTML file loaded from an embedded resource (or really, any other source for that matter) when a view is requested. What should I be looking at here?
Thanks!
Alright, I figured it out by digging around in the source code. I can load views from wherever I want by overriding the File Provider on the Razor View Engine options class:
services.AddMvc().AddRazorOptions(x => x.FileProvider = new EmbeddedFileProvider(typeof(Startup).Assembly));
Now the only problem I see is that there appears to be no way to embed resources in an ASP.NET 5 DLL via Visual Studio...

Load View from Plugin without Embedding it as Resources in nopCommerce

We're working on a Plugin development where we need to have to override theme view files from within the Plugin. For example, consider a Category Product Listing Page, where instead of theme View file we need to provide its view from within a Plugin view files.
However, this is very limiting, as it works only if we embed the resource while building the Plugin. So that way, it is not possible to customize View File, but we can not embed View file in the Plugin becasue we need that View files can be customized as per custom requirement of the project.. but core Plugin functions remains the same.
So basically need to call the View file in the Plugin without embeding it.
I have viewed few plugins that are doing it this way, but I'm unable to figure out how to do that in my plugin. Any idea how to build plugin this way that allows to change modifications in View files.
Just a note that we're working on nopCommerce 2.65 version.
Have a look at this link: http://coding-in.net/mvc-3-organize-your-partial-views/. Basically you just need to create a custom view engine and tell ASP.Net to find the view in a special path. :)

Converting MVC2 to MVC3 and pages to Razor

First and foremost reason to update big old MVC2 project for me is the Razor engine. Now following this instructions
I successfully converted the project without yet touching .aspx and .ascx files.
1) Can you guys tell me now, how can I convert Master pages to layouts, and start converting pages and user controls without breaking any existing MVC2 pages? (it's a large project, can't do them all at once). Can I somehow use old master pages as layouts in razor pages?
I converted a couple of partial aspx pages which don't use a master page.
I used Telerik's aspx2razor converter - it helps although you still have to do a lot of manual revisions.
2) Is there any other better tool out there?
You can use Razor and the normal views side by side. By default, MVC3 looks for razor first, then will fall back to the WebFormsViewEngine.
So you should have no problem, and you can tackle each page in time as you see fit.

Categories

Resources