I am stumped by this very simple problem. I am making a tile-based game engine and need to be able to allow a user to edit the map using a WPF User Interface. Naively, I had assumed that I could simply constantly update a good old fashioned "buffered" System.Drawing.Graphics.Bitmap using Graphics.FromImage. I would draw onto the bitmap the tiles that make up the map, and then blit the buffer Bitmap to the screen. However, from my thorough research I now believe that it isn't that easy at all.
Rather than bore you with what I've found out so far (that either doesn't work, or is incredibly slow), may I ask very simply, what is the best way for continuously drawing large numbers of bitmaps efficiently via a WPF UI?
I will accept such suggestions as "go back to Windows Forms". If that's the case, then I am going to be very dissapointed with WPF!
The WriteableBitmap class is a high-performance WPF-compatible bitmap that allows direct access to its bits. This MSDN documentation page contains a fairly thorough example of using it.
Freezable can make a big difference to performance when dealing with Bitmaps, you can then also load the buffer using a background thread to stop the UI locking up.
This tutorial covers the basics
Related
As part of my audio libary i would like to create a sample visualisations.
I know how I get the values I want to draw like fft results and so on.
But the main problem is that I don t know whats the best way to draw them. I have quite a lot of experience in using wpf but I never had to do something like this. What should I use to keep performance as good as possible?
There are a number of different approaches you can take, depending on the quality you need, memory usage, and performance....here are just some.
create a new object derived from FrameworkElement, and then inside draw the "visual" aspect dynamically by drawing onto a DrawingContext during OnRender. Drawings have a much lower overhead than other WPF elements such as Shapes, Image, etc. However, it still may not scale well if you have 1000s of elements. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms751619.aspx
WriteableBitmapEx....it will give you the drawing primitives you need to write into a Bitmap directly. http://writeablebitmapex.codeplex.com/ .. see this for some demos which are spookily similar to what you would do for an audio visualization. http://blogs.claritycon.com/blog/2011/03/advanced-animation-animating-15000-visuals-in-silverlight-2/
use DirectX with Direct2D. This offers DirectX like performance, but you would need to use COM interop or C++/CLI code wrappers to make it available to your .NET C# code. http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/113991/Using-Direct2D-with-WPF
Some other links:
http://jeremiahmorrill.wordpress.com/2011/02/14/a-critical-deep-dive-into-the-wpf-rendering-system/
I need to speed up my image viewer, and wondering if I should be looking into creating my own DirectX control to do so.
My image viewer displays medical images. They can be pretty large. We're talking 55mb when it comes to mammography. The pixel data is 16bit greyscale stored in a ushort array. Without getting into the gory details, my current approach is loading the pixel data into an ImageSource, and using the WPF Image control.
I've never done anything with DirectX. Is it worth diving into it? Would it be any faster than the native WPF stuff? If so how significantly? Or, should I just forget about DirectX and look into areas where I can improve my current approach?
Before somebody says so, I know WPF utilize DirectX. I'm wondering If removing the WPF layer and writing the DirectX myself will improve performance.
I have some experience drawing multi-gigabyte satellite and chart imagery. Working with imagery around 55MB should probably work okay even without trying to optimize it too much. You haven't really given enough detail to recommend one alternative over the other, so I will give my opinion on the pros and cons.
Using 2D windows APIs will be the simplest to implement and should always be fast enough if you don't need to rotate and simply want to display an image and zoom and pan around. If you treat it as one large image the performance will not be as good when you zoom out if you are drawing with halftoning to give a nice smooth image. This is because it will effectively have to read all 55mb of image every time it draws.
To get around this performance issue you can make multiple bitmaps, effectively mip-mapping your image. As you zoom out you can pick the reduced resolution image closest to the resolution you are trying to draw . If you are not familiar with mip-mapping here is a Wikipedia link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mipmap
Implementing it with DirectX will be 10x as difficult. Different graphics hardware has different maximum texture sizes. Most likely you will need to break your image up in to multiple textures to draw and you will also have to keep track of render states, viewing matrices, etc.
However, if you do use DirectX, you can implement lots of real-time photo adjustments You can do real-time rotation by simply adjusting view matrices. You can do real-time contrast, brightness, gamma, and sharpness easily in a pixel shader.
There are two other API's I might suggest. If you are willing to limit yourself to Vista or later then Direct2D would be a little simpler than Direct3D. Also if you ever will need to implement it on a non-windows platform I would suggest using OpenGL instead. My current project is in Direct3D because a few years ago when we started it OpenGL was falling behind and I didn't forsee the popularity of Android devices. I now wish we had used OpenGL instead.
Try profiling to see where WPF is spending its time. Are you displaying the images at their native resolution? If not it might be worthwhile to do some preprocessing and create 1/2 resolution versions.
I'm currently working on an application with the need to display large engineering drawings that can be 8800x6800 or larger. The requirements state that the user should be able to pan and zoom the image. Ideally, they'd like to be able to annotate the images as well. If you look at the Windows Photo Viewer, you'll see the performance and features I'm looking to emulate, minus the annotation part.
So far, I've tried a couple different approaches for displaying the images and none seem to offer the performance that I'm looking for. Either they take up a lot of memory or they're slow. These are the approaches I've taken:
Viewbox with the Image as a child. Memory usage is OK, but re-sizing the Viewbox is slow. I haven't tried zooming/panning with this approach yet because of that.
InkCanvas with the Image set either as the background or as a child. With this approach zooming/panning by way of ScaleTransform and TranslateTransform seemed so-so, but memory usage could be up in the 450-600 MB range.
This is my first foray into image manipulation with .NET/WPF and my knowledge on the subject is fairly limited. What are some best-practices for dealing with large images, especially with WPF? I've read that tiling the image (like deep zoom) can help, but was unsure on how to do this or if it's the best idea in my situation. Do you know of any resources that might help me understand this better?
By "tiling" if you mean splitting the image up into separate pieces and only displaying a small subset at once to improve performance, this would be called "virtualisation".
Microsoft has an excellent blog about virtualising items and even provides a reference implementation of a VirtualCanvas which you can use as the starting point for a virtualised control.
Link here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/blogs/jgoldb/virtualized-wpf-canvas
Note that this blog includes zoom and scale as part of the discussion as well as a discussion about smooth scrolling and pre-emptive loading of tiles for best UI responsiveness.
I'm creating a cad viewer which deals with very large image files and I am trying to optimise it for as high a framerate and low a memory footprint as possible.
It uses GDI+ for rendering onto a panel.
It's current flaw is with image rendering. Some of the files I'm using reference images which are particularly big (8000x8000 pixels). I've optimised the memory usage by only loading them when they become visible and disposing of them when they're not. This reduces the chance of the program running out of memory but prevents the images from being loaded and unloaded too often; however rendering the images themselves (context.DrawImage) still carries a very large overhead.
I'm now exploring ways of blitting the images into a smaller buffer of some sort, rendering this (generally much smaller) buffer, and then refreshing/rebuilding it when the zoom level changes significantly.
The problem is, I can't find any provision for this in GDI whatsoever. Can anyone suggest how I could achieve it?
I don't think GDI is designed for such high-speed updates of images. If you are trying to scroll the image, and tracking the mouse with each move, try to shift sections of the image and fill in the space opened up by the shift. Essentially reuse the tricks that programmers used when smoothly scrolling/panning graphics at a time when CPU's are slow and RAM is small.
If you're creating a new graphics application that needs a high framerate and are looking for suggestions, then I suggest abandoning GDI+ and using WPF. WPF uses hardware acceleration and supports retained-mode graphics; this has much better performance for less work than GDI+.
If there is some limitation that forbids WPF, please explain it in your question. This is relevant because such limitations can also impact GDI+ drawing.
GDI Binned in favour of Direct3D as 3D elements came into the equation anyway. Images turned into single thumbnails and larger tiles that are loaded in/out as required.
I faced a similar problem when developing my own GIS application. The best solution I found for this (even when using WPF) is to tile big images and display only the portions that are visible. This is being said, I would switch to WPF not only for the reasons given in the above answers but also for the good imaging support offered. See this link for more information
See above.
I need to move my bitmaps around a Form, or perhaps inside a PictureBox in a form. I have not been able to find any tutorials on this specific subject, and even the base GDI+ stuff is a bit confusing. I am looking for a simple and THOROUGHLY explained way on how to do this.
I am needing this for a rendering engine for an 8-bit game I am collaborating on.
GDI+ may not be the best option.
Sprites are generally drawn using "blitting". However, I've read (perhaps outdated?) claims that GDI+ blit operations are slow because they're not hardware accelerated.
If this is 8-bit game rendering, maybe you don't care - but maybe you could use SDL.NET.
In particular, try this tutorial. You should probably follow that first bit of advice (do the hello world first) but this is worth a skim through first to see if it fits.
EDIT - actually, there's not much tutorial there ATM. The main SDL docs (for the C version) are probably OK, but it's still a bit of a pain. Oh well.