Develop Reference

Docking an existing QWidget in QWindow

For those who are very familiar with C# or VB.NET using the UserControl component in the .NET Framework (which is the hottest framework in my opinion), you were used to adding several buttons that preview different user controls as follows:
1) First you would prepare an appropriate user interface (contains 3 buttons and a single panel on the right area to view each user control after clicking one of the added buttons).
2) Adding 3 user controls from the solution explorer...
3) Inserting the content on each user control...
4) Implementing code for the 3 buttons on the frmMain.cs as the following (for this implementation we will be implementing the "Welcome" button carrying the object name as welcomeBtn, and the rest will have identical code but different user control names instead):
private void welcomeBtn_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
//Clear up everything from the panel if any item exist(s)...
mainPanel.Controls.Clear();
//Create a new instance of a user control for the button...
UserControl1_Welcome welcome = new UserControl1_Welcome();
//Show up the created instance of the user control
mainPanel.Controls.Add(welcome);
}
5) Finally, the program will end up initially like this when running:
http://i.stack.imgur.com/OENwG.png
** Usage of the program **
When you click on the "Welcome" button for example, the result should be expected to be like this:
http://i.stack.imgur.com/iCyo3.png
... and when you click on a different button, lets say "License Agreement" button, you would expect to see something other than your current selection.
MAIN QUESTION
How can we bring the simplicity of Windows Forms in QT CREATOR by applying the "QDockWidget"?
I have tried inserting the QDockWidget component with no problems, but when I try to do the equivalent .NET code for adding the QWidget inside the QDockWidget:
ui->dockWidget->setWidget(myWidget);
which I think is equivalent to this line of code in C#.NET (correct me if I'm wrong here):
ui.Controls.Add(myWidget);
After using this code, my program won't crash nor shows anything running...
P.S. I'm sorry for linking the images, I don't have 10 reputation for making them show up...

What I want is to have a program that does the same thing with the C# example (showing a user control based on the click of a button).
If you want to show a particular widget based on a button click, I suggest to use a QStackedWidget
A simple example would be like this:
// In the constructor of your CustomWidget
// Create your buttons
QPushButton* firstButton = new QPushButton("First Button", this);
QPushButton* secondButton = new QPushButton("Second Button", this);
QPushButton* thirdButton = new QPushButton("Third Button", this);
// Create your (custom) widgets
QLabel* firstPageWidget = new QLabel("First Label", this);
QLabel* secondPageWidget = new QLabel("Second Label", this);
QLabel* thirdPageWidget = new QLabel("Third Label", this);
// Add them to the stackWidget
/*QStackedWidget* */ m_stackedWidget = new QStackedWidget(this);
m_stackedWidget->addWidget(firstPageWidget);
m_stackedWidget->addWidget(secondPageWidget);
m_stackedWidget->addWidget(thirdPageWidget);
// Insert buttons and stackWidget to CustomWidget
QVBoxLayout* layoutStack = new QVBoxLayout();
layoutStack->addWidget(m_stackedWidget);
QVBoxLayout* layoutButtons = new QVBoxLayout();
layoutButtons->addWidget(firstButton);
layoutButtons->addWidget(secondButton);
layoutButtons->addWidget(thirdButton);
QHBoxLayout* layout = new QHBoxLayout();
layout->addLayout(layoutButtons);
layout->addLayout(layoutStack);
setLayout(layout);
// Connect button clicks to slots
connect(firstButton, SIGNAL(clicked()), this, SLOT(onFirstButtonClicked()));
connect(secondButton, SIGNAL(clicked()), this, SLOT(onSecondButtonClicked()));
connect(thirdButton, SIGNAL(clicked()), this, SLOT(onThirdButtonClicked()));
Then you change the currently visible widget in the slots:
void CustomWidget::onFirstButtonClicked() {
m_stackedWidget->setCurrentIndex(0);
}
void CustomWidget::onSecondButtonClicked() {
m_stackedWidget->setCurrentIndex(1);
}
void CustomWidget::onThirdButtonClicked() {
m_stackedWidget->setCurrentIndex(2);
}
Note that if you want the button clicks just to simply change some text (as opposed to change the visible widget), you probably better use a QTextEdit instead of a QStackedWidget, and in the slots call setText("....");
If you have a lot of buttons, you'd better use QSignalMapper to limit the number of slots.
Also, I didn't get why you mentioned QDockWidget since they have a quite specific usage:
The QDockWidget class provides a widget that can be docked inside a QMainWindow or floated as a top-level window on the desktop.
QDockWidget provides the concept of dock widgets, also know as tool palettes or utility windows. Dock windows are secondary windows placed in the dock widget area around the central widget in a QMainWindow.
If you simply want a separate window, you're probably looking for a QDialog
How to do this with QtDesigner:
First you would prepare an appropriate user interface (contains 3 buttons and a single QStackedWidget on the right area to view each user control after clicking one of the added buttons).
Adding 3 pages for the user controls in the stack (+ one for the "empty" page if you really need that). If you want to design the Controls in separate UI Files / Only in Code (instead of all controls in your MainFrame), you would add plain QWidgets and promote them to the appropriate specific widget type
Inserting the content on each user control...
Implementing code for the 3 buttons on the frmMain.cpp/.h as the following (for this implementation we will be implementing the "Welcome" button carrying the object name as welcomeBtn, and the rest will have identical code but different user control names instead):
void FrmMain::on_welcomeBtn_clicked() {
ui->stack->setCurrentWidget(ui->welcomeWidget);
}
Select the "empty" page at as the current page in the designer, so the program will end up initially like this when running: (your screenshot)
When you click on the "Welcome" button for example, the result should be expected to be like this: (your second screenshot)

In my opinion, Miki's answer is the only correct approach to this use case (using a QStackedWidget).
For sake of completeness, I'll demonstrate how the same Clear and Add method as used in .NET is done in Qt:
// Assume controlPanel is a QWidget where you want to place the items
// Assume that controlPanel has set a layout (e.g. QHBoxLayout)
// Clear: Remove all Items from layout
QLayoutItem *child;
while ((child = controlPanel->layout()->takeAt(0)) != NULL) {
delete child;
}
// Now widgets are still there, but not layouted. Delete them explicitly
foreach (QWidget * w, controlPanel->findChildren<QWidget*>()) {
w->deleteLater();
}
// Now controlPanel is cleared
// Add new control
controlPanel->layout()->addWidget(new MyNewControlWidget);

First is, we can not force how other framework works to another one. Each framework has its flow and design.
What I am understand is you want to show another widget to the main window.
If you want to use the QDockWidget, its says on the documentation like this :
void QDockWidget::setWidget(QWidget * widget)
Sets the widget for the dock widget to widget.
If the dock widget is visible when widget is added, you must show() it explicitly.
Note that you must add the layout of the widget before you call this function; if not, the widget will not be visible.
Please share here you code of myWidget, so we can try to help you to figure out what is wrong.
On my side, I can achieve it by add the QVboxLayout on your ui->dockwidget and add QLabel with emtpy string and when you want to show myWidget just call ui->dockwidget->vboxlayout->replaceWidget(label, myWidget);

Recreate a group of Controls

Let's say that I have a panel with like... 3 controls in it. I may end up adding more controls to it or changing the positioning within that panel. When the program starts, I will programmatically HIDE the control. Eventually, the user can click a button that will create a duplicate of the original panel to populate an area on the form. The button should have the option for another click eventually, meaning that multiple instances of these can come about to populate this area. Remember that these controls may have text labels within them that can be individually set or altered later on, programmatically. I am assuming that to do this program, I need to make a List of controls, maybe a List of panels? I'm not exactly sure how to do this considering the fact that I need multiple controls duplicated multiple times.
Is there a nice, simple way to do this? I really don't want to do the duplication with any kind of 3rd-party package.

You will have to do it in code and therefore it'll be as nice as you can code ;-)
Seriously the course most often taken is to
create a UserControl which is a class related to a form, with the layout you want..
..and add more and more instances of it..
..often to a FlowLayoutPanel, often with AutoScroll
This is pretty nice and simple imo.
Here is a short walk-though..:
first we start, as usual, by picking a nice name for the UserObject class, maybe 'DataPanel' or 'BookItem'..
Next we create it: Go to the project explorer and right-click, choosing Add-New UserControl and give it the class name you chose. I'll use 'BookItem'.
Now you can see the Designer showing you a small empty control.
Look closer: You can also see that in the project explorer ther is now not only the new 'BookItem.cs' file but also the complementary 'BookItem.Designer.cs' and even a 'BookItem.resx' file; so this works very much like creating a new Form..
Let's add a few controls from the toolbox, I chose to add a PictureBox, four Labels and a NumericUpDown.
Have a look at the BookItem.Designer.cs file: Here you can see the very things you see in a Form.Desginer.cs file: All settings and all declarations for all controls you add to the layout. Note especially the declarations (at the bottom of the file): Just like for a Form, all controls by default are declared as private!
We can now work on the layout and script the controls. We also can add functions and properties to the UC, just like a Form.
Please note: Anything you need to access from outside, read from your form or its methods must be public! So if you want to access the NUpDown, let call it 'nud_quantity' you have a choice
You can change its declaration in the BookItem.Designer.cs from private to public or in the Designer by changing the Modifiers property
Or you can write a public function in the UC to get/set its value
Chosing between those two ways is a matter of taste; if other developers will work with the UC class, it will probably be better to put close control over what you expose by writing access methods.
After you have compiled the project you can see the new UC in the Toolbox.
You can now either add it from the Toolbox or
you can add it in code like any control you create dynamically.
Let's look at an example:
Imagine a simple order system in a bookstore: The customer has done a search on the books in our store and is presented with a list of books in a DataGridView 'dgv_bookList', readonly, multiselect. To the right there is a FlowLayoutPanel 'flp_cart' represeting a shopping cart. And we have a command button 'cb_addItems' to add selected books to the cart.
The Button might be scripted like this:
private void cb_addItems_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (dgv_bookList.SelectedRows.Count <= 0) return;
foreach (DataGridViewRow row in dgv_bookList.SelectedRows)
{
BookItem book = new BookItem (row);
book.label1.Text = "#00" + book.label1.Text;
book.Name = book.label1.Text;
flp_cart.Controls.Add(book);
}
}
This will add one BookItem for each selected row in the DGV.
A few things to note on the above code:
I pass a DataGridViewRow into the constructor of the UC so it can directly set its labels! This means that, in addition to the parameterless contructor the desginer has built for us, we need to write a second contructor, maybe like this:
public bookItem()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public bookItem(DataGridViewRow bookData)
{
InitializeComponent();
label1.Text = bookData.Cells[0].FormattedValue.ToString();
label2.Text = bookData.Cells[1].FormattedValue.ToString();
label3.Text = bookData.Cells[2].FormattedValue.ToString();
label4.Text = bookData.Cells[3].FormattedValue.ToString();
}
Instead you could write a public setData(DataGridViewRow bookData) function.
Also note how stupid my labels are named! You can do better than that, I hope!
Also note how I access 'label1' and modify its Text from a Button in the Form; to do that I had to change its declaration in the Desginer.cs file:
private System.Windows.Forms.PictureBox pb_cover;
public System.Windows.Forms.Label label1; // <<----expose this label !
private System.Windows.Forms.Label label2;
private System.Windows.Forms.Label label3;
private System.Windows.Forms.Label label4;
private System.Windows.Forms.NumericUpDown numericUpDown1;
Often preferrable: An access function, maybe like this:
public int quantity() { return (int) numericUpDown1.Value; }
Or, of course a Property:
public int quantity { get { return (int)numericUpDown1.Value; } }
Also note, that I set the Name of the BookData item to some variant of the 1st data item, my book id. This might as well, or better, happen in the constructor; and there should be a check to prevent adding the same item twice..
All in all one can say, that using UserControls is very much like working with Forms, including all the usual ways or tricks for inter-form communication: keep references, expose members, create properties and functions..
One final Note: Like with forms or subclassed controls there is one catch: By placing them in the designer, you assign the designer the responsiblity to display your UC during design time.
This is normally just fine; however it is also possible to introduce subtle mistakes which make it impossible for the designer to display the control. You need to correct these problems before the designer will be able to show a control or any form that contains it. Let have a look at a simple example of such a problem:
Let's script the Paint event of the PictureBox 'pb_cover' in the UC:
public Brush myBrush = null;
private void pb_cover_Paint(object sender, PaintEventArgs e)
{
if (pb_cover.Image == null)
{
Size s = pb_cover.ClientSize;
e.Graphics.FillRectangle(myBrush, 0, 0, s.Width, s.Height);
e.Graphics.DrawLine(Pens.Red, 0, 0, s.Width, s.Height);
e.Graphics.DrawLine(Pens.Red, s.Height, 0, 0, s.Width);
}
}
And let's modify the code in the Add button:
BookItem book = new BookItem (row);
book.label1.Text = "#00" + book.label1.Text;
book.myBrush = Brushes.OliveDrab;
flp_cart.Controls.Add(book);
Now, if you run the program all will be fine. Even if you try to look at the UC in the designer there may or may not be problems. But once you try to open a Form on which the UC was placed, the Desginer will crash and tell you that it can't work, since the Brush is null. Here the remedy is simple: add a default value to the Brush declaration and all is well. Other situations may need a little more thinking..
I don't even run into the problem btw, since I have not placed an instance of BookItem on the Form; they are only created in the Add Button..
I hope that gets you started!

Hide Tab Header on C# TabControl

I am developing a Windows Form Application with several pages. I am using a TabControl to implement this. Instead of using the header to switch between tabs, I want my application to control this e.g. the next tab should open after the user has filled in a text box and clicked the next button.

Add a new class to your project and paste the code shown below. Compile. Drop the new control from the top of the toolbox onto your form. It shows the tabs at design time so you can easily switch between them while designing. They are hidden at runtime, use the SelectedTab or SelectedIndex property in your code to switch the page.
using System;
using System.Windows.Forms;
public class TablessControl : TabControl {
protected override void WndProc(ref Message m) {
// Hide tabs by trapping the TCM_ADJUSTRECT message
if (m.Msg == 0x1328 && !DesignMode) m.Result = (IntPtr)1;
else base.WndProc(ref m);
}
}

tabControl1.Appearance = TabAppearance.FlatButtons;
tabControl1.ItemSize = new Size(0, 1);
tabControl1.SizeMode = TabSizeMode.Fixed;

Create new UserControl, name it for example TabControlWithoutHeader and change inherited UserControl to TabControl and add some code. Result code should look like:
public partial class TabControlWithoutHeader: TabControl
{
public TabControlWithoutHeader()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
protected override void WndProc(ref Message m)
{
if (m.Msg == 0x1328 && !DesignMode)
m.Result = (IntPtr)1;
else
base.WndProc(ref m);
}
}
After compile you will have TabControlWithoutHeader control in ToolBox. Drop it on form, in designer you will see headers, but at runtime they'll be hidden. If you want to hide them in designer too, then remove && !DesignMode.
Hope that helps.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/c290832f-3b84-4200-aa4a-7a5dc4b8b5bb/tabs-in-winform?forum=winforms

You can replace tabcontrol with a hand made panel that mimic like you want:
class MultiPagePanel : Panel
{
private int _currentPageIndex;
public int CurrentPageIndex
{
get { return _currentPageIndex; }
set
{
if (value >= 0 && value < Controls.Count)
{
Controls[value].BringToFront();
_currentPageIndex = value;
}
}
}
public void AddPage(Control page)
{
Controls.Add(page);
page.Dock = DockStyle.Fill;
}
}
And then add pages and set current visible page:
MultiPagePanel p;
// MyTabPage is a Control derived class that represents one page on your form.
MyTabPage page = new MyTabPage();
p.AddPage(page);
p.CurrentPageIndex = 0;

I was needing this code but in VB.net so I converted it. If someone needs this code in VB.Net there it is
Imports System
Imports System.Windows.Forms
Public Class TablessControl
Inherits System.Windows.Forms.TabControl
Protected Overrides Sub WndProc(ByRef m As System.Windows.Forms.Message)
' Hide tabs by trapping the TCM_ADJUSTRECT message
If (m.Msg = Convert.ToInt32("0x1328", 16) And Not DesignMode) Then
m.Result = CType(1, IntPtr)
Else
MyBase.WndProc(m)
End If
End Sub
End Class
and thanks to #Hans Passant for the answer in C#

To complement Hans Passant's existing answer, I've found four ways to hide the arrows from the user when the numbers of tabs exceeds the width of the TablessControl. No single solution is necessarily perfect for everyone, but may be for you (or at least a combination of them).
Solution 1:
Simply enable Multiline. This will prevent the arrows from appearing in the first place. However, bear in mind, you may lose WYSIWYG in the designer because the vertical space will be adjusted downwards vertically, and controls within the TablessControl may even be 'chopped off' at the bottom (again, only in developer mode though).
Solution 2:
A more advanced solution which solves the WYSIWYG problem above is to only enable Multiline once the program gets running. Simply add this constructor to the TablessControl class:
public TablessControl()
{
bool designMode = (LicenseManager.UsageMode == LicenseUsageMode.Designtime);
if (!designMode) Multiline = true;
}
To the developer, they will still appear as a single line of tabs.
Solution 3:
Decrease the font size of the TablessControl. Each tab should shrink accordingly. Since the user never gets to see the tabs, it shouldn't matter much if you set the font sizes to even 4pt.
However be careful, because the TablessControl's contents may also be resized. If this happens, re-edit the font size for each widget inside, and at that point, they'll thankfully stay at that size even if you then decide to re-change the main TablessControl's font size again.
This approach also has the advantage of more closely showing the true WYSIWYG vertical real-estate to the developer (which can look fine for the user, but may be cut off slightly at the bottom in the designer due to the height of the tabs).
This solution can be combined with Solution 1 and 2 for accumulated advantages.
Solution 4:
This solution isn't necessarily so great if any of the tabs have text which are long. Thanks to Hans for suggesting it.
First set the TablessControl's SizeMode to 'Fixed', and then reduce the TablessControl's ItemSize Width property to a smaller number to reduce each tab's width. Feel free also to adjust the ItemSize Height property to help address the aforementioned WYSIWYG issue, though Solution 3 may be more helpful for that problem.
This solution can be combined with the above solutions to further accumulate advantages.

If you really want to do this, yo can do something like this
tcActionControls.Region = new Region(new RectangleF(
tbPageToShow.Left,
tbPageToShow.Top,
tbPageToShow.Width,
tbPageToShow.Height)
);
Where tcActionControls is your TabControl and tbPageToShow is a TabPage to show in this precise moment.
Should work for you.
Regards.

This solution appears to work well -
How to hide tabs in the tab control?
Insert Tabcontrol into a form, the default name being tabcontrol1.
Ensure that tabcontrol1 is selected in the Properties pane in visual studio and change the following properties:
a. Set Appearance to Buttons
b. Set ItemSize 0 for Width and 1 for Height
c. Set Multiline to True
d. Set SizeMode to Fixed
This is best done after your have finished your design time tasks as it hides them in the designer as well - making it difficult to navigate!

You can try removing the TabPage from the TabPageCollection :
TabControl.TabPageCollection tabCol = tabControl1.TabPages;
foreach (TabPage tp in tabCol)
{
if(condition)
{
tabCol.Remove(tp);
}
}

In my WinForms app, I was able to work around this by positioning the TabControl's y-coordinate outside the visible range of the form, so the tabs were effectively hidden. This example only works if the tabControl is near the top of the form, but you get the idea.
private void frmOptions_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
tabControl1.Top = -23; //Only tabPage contents visible
}

c# - create invisible user control

I need to create a user control in C#.Net, which can be added to the application without being visible - just like the FolderBrowserDialog. It's a new window which I'll be using often so I think this is the right way. The window will be opened by envoking the showDialog-Method as known from the other dialog.
Any Idea?
Thanks and regards,
Daniel

Since all these "invisible" controls derive from Component class, you should start by reading the MSDN article on it: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.componentmodel.component.aspx.

simply set Visible to false or isn't this what you're asking for ?

A UserControl is by definition not a Form; I think what you really want is a Component. That said, couldn't you really just create a new Form class that has the functionality you want? Whenever you want to display it, create a new instance and call ShowDialog. Or, if you want to preserve state, add an instance as a class member to your parent form, call its Show method whenever you want to display it, and add an event handler to its FormClosing event to check:
if (e.CloseReason == CloseReason.UserClosing)
and, if so,
e.Cancel = true;
Hide();
(This last part is to prevent errors if the user closes the form and then tries to display again after it's been disposed.)

I think more information may be needed, but if your crating a custom user control, the control should have a .Visible property. The follow is an example of how a button can be located on the form but hidden from a user.
button.Visible = true; // shows the button
button.Show(); // Shows the button
button.Visible = false; // hides the button
button.Hide(); // Hides the button
While the button may still be on the form/control, it will not be interactible by the user. You can still perform programmatic control on the button, but essentially it is not a user control while it is 'hidden'. If you want there to be a sort of hidden button that the user can click you will need to do other things to obtain this but It doesn't should like that is what you want.

This show/hide thought process sounds a lot like pains and confusion leftover from classic VB. The old form methods of show and hide, etc., were confusing and often left me as a developer in a position to not know whether an object existed or if was merely invisible. And checking was only trivial if you used On Error Goto to prevent a null reference. So right off I would advise not to think in terms of visibility unless you are doing something with a web page and need to maintain space and state.
First, create a Windows form and add it to your project, assuming that is the type of project that you are describing. Decorate the form with the proper controls, and where applicable, create properties to allow public access to the control values. Also set the DialogResult property of the buttons that either "OK" or "Cancel" the form. Give it an appropriate border style of either Fixed3D or FixedDialog. Maybe also set the property for where you want the form to appear on startup -- center parent, center screen, Windows default, etc. The event handlers for both "OK" and "Cancel" should invoke this.Close(); to close the window.
From the calling point in the code, here's some hypothetical code to get you going in the right direction. Write something like this in the place where you want to invoke your Dialog.
int intResult = 0;
string strResult = null;
MyDialogForm frm = new MyDialogForm();
frm.Title = "Select an Item";
frm.SomeProperty = 0;
frm.SomeOtherProperty = true;
if (frm.ShowDialog() == DialogResult.OK)
{
intResult = frm.Result;
strResult = frm.StringResult;
}
else if (frm.ShowDialog() == DialogResult.Cancel)
{
// User clicked the cancel button. Nothing to do except maybe display a message.
MessageBox.Show("Canceled Task");
}
...
// Somewhere further on down, but within scope, simply repeat
// what you just did, but without having to reinstantiate the
// form Window. But if you make it that far within the same
// scope, this method might be too busy and may need to be
// factored down.
So in short:
Scrap show/hide -- its not a good
practice.
Save the form data without
using an invisible form to save it;
that's the class's job.
If the UI requires a lot of flipping back and
forth between windows, check your
design for other alternatives for
solving the original problem. Maybe a design pattern such as MVC is for you, depending upon the size and complexity of your application.
Sound good?

You can put that control in a Panel. Set the panel height = 0 visible = false when you dont want to show the control.
And do the vice versa when you want to show it.

Derive from Control, not UserControl, and in the constructor set Visible = false.
Also create an event handler in the constructor.
VisibleChanged += new EventHandler(SetVisibleFalse);
Create a method named SetVisibleFalse.
private void SetVisibleFalse(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (Visible) Visible = false;
}

How bad is the following snippet?

My question is simple: how bad is the following snippet of code? How would you do it?
CancelEventHandler _windowClosing;
private CancelEventHandler WindowClosing
{
set
{
clearEventHandlerList();
this.Closing += value;
_windowClosing = value;
/*
* if calling the method with null parameters,
* it will set up itself as the primary control on the Window
*/
_windowClosing(null,null);
}
get
{
return _windowClosing;
}
}
private readonly CancelEventHandler[] CONTROLS = null;
private int current = 0;
public InitializerForm()
{
InitializeComponent();
/*
* these are the handlers for the different controls,
* in the order of appereance to the user
*/
STATES = new CancelEventHandler[] { handler1, handler2, etc. };
WindowClosing = CONTROLS[0];
}
private void clearEventHandlerList()
{
foreach (CancelEventHandler c in CONTROLS)
{
this.Closing -= c;
}
}
private void handler1(object obj, CancelEventArgs e)
{
if (obj == null)
{
//hide every other control, but this one, also set up if necessary
}
else
{
//do something
WindowClosing = CONTROLS[++current]; // set the next control to show
e.Cancel = true;
}
}
The point would be that the code wouldn't close a form, but instead show another component on it, and the set the way to handle that (this is mobile platform, so clicking OK button on the top generates a closing event). This is because showing several forms (4 or 5) one after another to the user makes the app blink, and also very annoying, while replacing just components is much smoother. This model works, but seems very nasty, and I would like a cleaner way to handle this.
Update:
I updated the code sample so that variable names are somewhat speaky. Still, I'm convinced this is awful, (a) but not sure how much, and more importantly, (b) how to do it better.
Update 2:
So, it seems that the code is still a bit mysterious.
Now here's what the problem is:
I show the user a form, which instructs him what to do in several languages. He proceeds by clicking OK on the window. Next, I ask for his language, and then a few questions (where his/her GPS is, etc.) like this. After he could answer the questions (this shouldn't take more than a few seconds each), I show him a splash screen (I load stuff in a separate thread meanwhile), which has a picture. Showing these forms one after another makes the whole application start slow, and filled with UI lags.
Here's what I do to work around the lags: I put the content of the windows into panels, and put those panels one on another, and hide every one of them but the one that should be visible to the user. (current variable) Each of the windows does different things, so I need to change handler of the window closing event in addition. In this code the part which enables the panel is in the same function (handler1, handler2, etc.) with the part which handles the window closing event. If the arguments are null, it does the former, if it isn't (that means it was triggered by the user) it does the latter.
I need an extensible solution to this so that I can insert and remove dialogs anytime I want (the order and the pointers to the functions are stored in the CONTROLS field, and this seems to be very convenient, if you actually understand it. Although it is never easy to change the entire content of a form, there ought to be a simpler way to do this, as well a nicer one, that is what I'm looking for.
I hope this time I could explain how the model works.

I think it might be theoretically possible to make that code more delightfully diverting, perilously puckish, jovially jeopardous, cheerily chancy and unwarily whimsical but it would require some serious thought.

somehow your code makes me want to cry, i´m sorry. i read it twice and all i know about it is that it "doesStuff" with "STATES".
if you really want some help on this one you will have to work on it yourself first...

Use, XML! It's human-readable!
More seriously-
It seems like you're trying to create some sort of configuration wizard, so I'd start by researching that. Regarding your particular solution, I generally advocate very strongly against the "layered panel" approach. I do so because I maintain apps written by people who found this approach, or the related "hidden tabs on a tab control" approach, to be a good idea. It's not, and maintainers will curse your name for years to come.
That being said, what alternatives are there? Well, one alternative is what you've already dismissed because of its "flicker". I'd say that, in general, the flicker isn't that big of a deal for a quick and dirty application. It might be a good idea to make sure that your new window is called up before closing the old one, for example. (I'm assuming this is possible, I haven't developed on a mobile device.)
Another possibility might be a less-evil version of your layered panels. Instead of throwing a half-dozen panels into one form, create a separate user control for each wizard page and then add/remove the user controls to a containing form. This can avoid your flicker and will prove to be much easier to maintain because each page is in a different control. This might also ease any subsequent "Back" button functionality and make your data structures more naturally defined because those user controls will be associated with a specific logical bit of data. It's still not ideal, but it's probably good enough for a one-off solution.
A third technique, if you foresee extensive wizard modification as the product matures, might be to generalize the creation of your user controls by defining them in a more logical/declarative manner (e.g. via XML). If you dynamically generate sensible controls based on XML, then modifying the panels might be as easy as diving into your XML and doing something like:
<Questions>
<Question type="Text"> <!-- generate a textbox for the answer field -->
Favorite Color:
</Question>
<Question type="Number" range="0-255"> <!-- Maybe this is a spinner -->
The answer to life, the universe, and everything:
</Question>
</Questions>
That's just off the top of my head, and completely overkill for any one-off application, but it's a possibility.

Now, let me caveat this by saying this might work, but it may not be the answer to your real problem - that of a slow and unresponsive UI when you have a lot of forms. The real answer may be to just go ahead and do all separate forms, but have each form load its child forms in a background thread while the user is staring at the first form.
But assuming you're still set on this, I'd start off by making a separate class just to handle the Panel stacking/hierarchy. Call it PanelManager. You would instantiate the PanelManager and associate it with the main form, then add Panels to it (perhaps keyed to a String) and set the order. In the main form, have the closing handler call PanelManager.CloseCurrentPanel() and if there are no more Panels to show then it's time to close the main form.
Time for pseudo-code! Here's a quick idea for the class, i'll leave it to you to implement it:
public class PanelManager {
// constructor
public PanelManager (Form ownerForm);
// short-cut properties
public Panel this[int idx]
{ get; set; }
public int Index
{ get; set; }
// main functionality
public int AddPanel (Panel p);
public void SetPanelOrder (Panel p, int idx);
public void RemovePanel (Panel p);
public void RemovePanelAt (int idx);
// shows the first Panel
public void Show ();
// shows Panel[idx]
public void Show (int idx);
// adds the panel to the top of the stack and displays it
// returns the index of the panel
public int AddPanelAndShow (Panel p);
// hides the current panel, displays the one underneath it
// returns false if there are no more panels
public bool HideCurrentPanel ();
}
in the constructor for the main form, instantiate it by new PanelManager (this), then in the closing event handler, call panelManager.HideCurrentPanel () and then figure out whether or not you need to close it after that.