I've recently completed a (hopefully successful) VB to C# conversion on a decent-sized library. However, I am receiving some trouble from the compiler when trying to build it. I created a small helper library called ExtensionMethods, compiled it, dropped the .dll in the bin folder of the outlying project, and added a reference to it in the newly-converted library. The library has two namespaces, ExtensionMethods.Json and ExtensionMethods.Enums. In any class where I want to use the Enums namespace, I import it with using ExtensionMethods.Enums. I do the same for the .Json namespace (which works fine, by the way).
The following is picture evidence of what is happening:
Notice the blue squiggle under Enums with a simultaneous suggestion for Enums from Intellisense. Here is proof that VS actually recognizes the assembly (.ToInt() is the name of the extension method):
Notice how .ToInt() is both suggested by Intellisense as an extension method AND does not have a squiggle under it, even though ALLEGEDLY...
(three files use this namespace)
which would make sense, except for...
Essentially, what this is saying is that, "Yes, Jason, you have referenced all your assemblies correctly, yes, your assemblies contain the namespaces they should, but no, I don't feel like compiling today."
I just want to compile and be done with this monster. What am I missing here?
UPDATE
ExtensionMethods.Json, another namespace in ExtensionMethods works fine when referenced and does not produce an assembly reference error. Both projects were created on the same 64-Bit machine and everything targets .NET 4.
So here's how I fixed it. Basically I went and deleted .DLL from my bin folder, deleted every reference to it, dropped the .DLL back in, and re-referenced everything. Now, for some strange reason, that compilation problem is gone. Yay.
I vaguely remember something like this when I was struggling with a 64 vs 32 bit problem. Make sure the reference is usable by your project's platform. If I'm remembering correctly, I was referencing a 32-bit DLL in a project that was compiled for "Any CPU" on a 64-bit platform, or something of the sort, this was a while ago.
Only way to solve this I found when I had the same problem was commenting out all that and related code, removing the references, re-build all, adding the reference again and uncommenting the code, re-build.
note: re-build, not build... and just re-adding the reference doesn't help
It seems the builder gets an invalid partial build or something (don't know how it technically works) that it won't overwrite even if you tell it to re-build. You need to get rid of all the code and references and re-build to get rid of the invalid state.
(yes I know, it's a lot of work and it sucks, but it's the only way I found to get rid of it)
Related
First of all, thanks for the help in advance, and excuse me for my relative lack of knowledge on these subjects, and this long post. I have a strange reference issue I'm trying to work out. I've done many hours of research on this subject, but I think my limited knowledge is holding me back from understanding. I'm losing my mind a bit here.
We are reviewing a project and came across an odd situation where there are references to System.IO and System.Runtime in the original .csproj file for an application (Sitefinity 10.1.6502), but in the copy of the .csproj we have on file post-development they have been removed. There are still references to System.Runtime.Caching and System.Runtime.Serialization in both.
When I looked online and in Sitefinity's public Git example repos, I found that about 1/2 of the examples with code for the same version DO have and like the original file does, and 1/2 DO NOT have them like the file in our repo. Some appear to have those references added at a later time when upgraded versions (to 10.2 or 11).
I also do not see System.Runtime.dll in the current /bin folder, or see it mentioned in web.config. I do not have access to the GAC.
The question is whether these missing references will cause any problems. The project seems to compile properly in VS2017 using the post-development .csproj file we have (without System.IO and System.Runtime)
We believe the project was originally built in VS2015, and found this article that mentions the exact references we're dealing with, so perhaps VS2015 was part of the problem? Unresolved Project References for System.IO, System.Runtime
I understand these are facades and that System.IO is a namespace in System, which is directly references in both .csproj versions, so that should be covered, correct?
The real question is whether the missing in the post-dev .csproj file could cause any issues. Like I mentioned above, the project is compiling without it in VS2017, and the files seem to work fine on a testing server (can navigate the front-end web pages and all functionality works, but we have not been able to test any of the back-end functionality due to it sharing a database with the live environment (out of our control).
Through my research I've seen it mentioned that System.Runtime should get automatically included during tooling/compiling, and that in normal circumstances it does not need to be directly referenced like it is in half the repos we saw. Is this correct?
I worry less about System.IO because it is already included via System, but from what I understand that isn't the case with System.Runtime
Again, thanks so much for helping clear this up for us, we're beginning to go batty trying to figure out if this is an issue we should worry about or not!
I know the error message is common and there are plenty of questions on SO about this error, but no solutions have helped me so far, so I decided to ask the question. Difference to most of similar questions is me using App_Code directory.
Error message:
CS0012: The type 'Project.Rights.OperationsProvider' is defined in an
assembly that is not referenced. You must add a reference to assembly
'Project.Rights, version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null'.
Source File:
c:\inetpub\wwwroot\Test\Website\App_Code\Company\Project\BusinessLogic\Manager.cs
Following suggestions here and here, I have deleted all instances of Project.Rights.dll inside C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET/*.*
According to this, I checked if .cs files in question have build action set to "Compile". They do.
I have also double checked that the .cs file containing the "Project.Rights.OperationsProvider" type is deployed to App_Code directory.
For some reason, application is not looking for the type in the App_Code directory. Since I've deleted all instances of Project.Rights.dll (that I know of), I don't know which assembly the error message is mentioning.
When you get this error it isn't always obvious what is going on, but as the error says - you are missing a reference. Take the following line of code as an example:
MyObjectType a = new MyObjectType("parameter");
It looks simple enough and you probably have referenced "MyObjectType" correctly. But lets say one of the overloads for the "MyObjectType" constructor takes a type that you don't have referenced. For example there is an overload defined as:
public MyObjectType(TypeFromOtherAssembly parameter) {
// ... normal constructor code ...
}
That is at least one case where you will get this error. So, look for this type of pattern where you have referenced the type but not all the types of the properties or method parameters that are possible for functions being called on that type.
Hopefully this at least gets you going in the right direction!
Check target framework in the projects.
In my case "You must add a reference to assembly" actually meant, that caller and reference projects didn't have the same target framework. The caller project had .Net 4.5 , but referenced library had target 4.6.1.
I am sure, that MS compiler can be smarter and log more meaningful error message. I've added a suggestion to https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/issues/14756
In my case this was because doing a NuGet package update had only updated references to a dll dependency in some but not all projects in my solution - resulting in conflicting versions. Using a grep-style tool to search text within *.csproj files in my solution it was then easy to see the projects that still needed to be updated.
When you get this error, it means that code you are using makes a reference to a type that is in an assembly, but the assembly is not part of your project so it can't use it.
Deleting Project.Rights.dll is the opposite of what you want. You need to make sure your project can reference the assembly. So it must either be placed in the Global Assembly Cache or your web application's ~/Bin directory.
Edit-If you don't want to use the assembly, then deleting it is not the proper solution either. Instead, you must remove all references to it in your code. Since the assembly isn't directly needed by code you've written, but instead by something else you're referencing, you'll have to replace that referenced assembly with something that doesn't have Project.Rights.dll as a dependency.
In my case, I was referencing a library that was being built to the wrong Platform/Configuration (I had just created the referenced library).
Furthermore, I was unable to fix the problem in Visual Studio Configuration Manager -- unable to switch and create new Platforms and Configurations for this library. I fixed it by correcting the entries in the ProjectConfigurationPlatforms section of the .sln file for that project. All its permutations were set to Debug|Any CPU (I'm not sure how I did that). I overwrote the entries for the broken project with the ones for a working project and changed the GUID for each entry.
Entries for functioning project
{9E93345C-7A51-4E9A-ACB0-DAAB8F1A1267}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64
{9E93345C-7A51-4E9A-ACB0-DAAB8F1A1267}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64
Entries for corrupted project
{94562215-903C-47F3-BF64-8B90EF43FD27}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Debug|Any CPU
{94562215-903C-47F3-BF64-8B90EF43FD27}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Debug|Any CPU
Corrupted entries now fixed
{94562215-903C-47F3-BF64-8B90EF43FD27}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64
{94562215-903C-47F3-BF64-8B90EF43FD27}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64
I hope this helps someone.
It just happened to me that different projects were referencing different copies of the same dll.
I made sure all referenced the same file on disk, and the error disappeared as I expected.
Unloading and reloading the class library in Visual Studio solved this for me.
For me, this was caused by the project both directly and indirectly (through another dependency) referencing two different builds of Bouncy Castle that had different assembly names. One of the Bouncy Castle builds was the NuGet package, the other one was a debug build of the source downloaded from GitHub. Both were nominally version 1.8.1, but the project settings of the GitHub code set the assembly name to BouncyCastle whereas the NuGet package had the assembly name BouncyCastle.Crypto. Changing the project settings, thus aligning the assembly names, fixed the problem.
It didn't work for me when I've tried to add the reference from the .NET Assemblies tab.
It worked, though, when I've added the reference with BROWSE to C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319
I had this issue on a newly created solution that used existing projects. For some reason, one project could not "see" one other project, even though it had the same reference as every other project, and the referenced project was also building. I suspect that it was failing to detect something having to do with multiple target frameworks, because it was building in one framework but not the other.
Cleaning and rebuilding didn't work, and restarting VS didn't work.
What ended up working was opening a "Developer Command Prompt for VS 2019" and then issuing a msbuild MySolution.sln command. This completed successfully, and afterwards VS started building successfully also.
one of main reason can be the property of DLL
you must before do any thing to check the specific version property if it true make it false
Reason:
maybe the source code joined with other (old)version when you build it , but this Library upgraded with new update the version now different in the Assembly Cash and your application forbidden to get new DLL ,and after disable specific version property your applacaten will be free to get the new version of DLL references
Maybe a library (DLL file) you are using requires another library. In my case, I referenced a library that contained a database entity model - but I forgot to reference the entity framework library.
This can also mean you use a library, which exposes (public) types that are defined in a library. Even when you do not use these specifically in your library (the one that doesn't build).
What this probably prevents is you writing code that uses a class (which in its signature has the types from a library not referenced) that you cannot use.
For me the reason why the error appeared was that the WebForm where the error was reported has been moved from another folder, but the name of its codefile class remained unchanged and didn't correspond to the actual path.
Initial state:
Original file path: /Folder1/Subfolder1/MyWebForm.aspx.cs
Original codefile class name: Folder1_Subfolder1_MyWebForm
After the file was moved:
File path: /Folder1/MyWebForm.aspx.cs
Codefile class name (unchanged, with the error shown): Folder1_Subfolder1_MyWebForm
The solution:
Rename your codefile class Folder1_Subfolder1_MyWebForm
to one corresponding with the new path: Folder1_MyWebForm
All at once - problem solved, no errors reporting..
The type 'Domain.tblUser' is defined in an assembly that is not
referenced. You must add a reference to assembly 'Domain,
Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null'.
**Solved:**
Add reference of my domain library layer to my web app libary layer
Note: Make sure your references are correct according to you DI container
In my case this was because I used
Implicit Operator
between BLL and DAL classes.when I want to use BLL Layer In Application Layer I got this error.
I changed
implicit operator
to
explicit operator
it be OK.
Thanks
In my case the version of the dll referenced was actually newer than the one that I had before.
I just needed to roll back to the previous release and that fixed it.
I have a similar problem, and I remove the RuntimeFrameworkVersion, and the problem was fixed.
Try to remove 1.1.1 or
My problem was that the Output Type for one of my projects was set to Console Application. To fix this, I right-clicked the project, chose Properties, clicked the Application tab, and change Output Type (from Console Application) to Class Library. After I re-compiled, this error went away.
Clean your solution and rebuild worked for me (in Visual Studio, these are options you get when you right click in your solution explorer), the error is gone in my project.
When I run unit testing to serialize to an xml file, I keep getting error message:
Could not load file or assembly
'Company.Fin.Bank.Common.XmlSerializers.dll, Version=1.0.0.0,
Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The
system cannot find the file specified.
I guess Company.Fin.Bank.Common.XmlSerializers.dll may be in cache somewhere but it is impossible to find this dll, even though i don't need that dll. I want to remove it. But where can i find it? is it possibly in a cache? if yes how can i clean the cache from VS? This problem is very new to me.
What a weird part is that i used another laptop (win 7) to run the unit testing, there is no error message i got - it worked. but when i used my own laptop (win 8) i keep getting error message. I have no idea why.
I hope to find solution from you. Your help means alot. Thanks!!!
That assembly is dynamically generated by the framework (XMLSerializer)
In .Net implementation, the XmlSerializer generates a temporary
assembly for serializing/deserializing your classes (for performance
reasons).
Also, this may be normal behavior - is it stopping your application from running?
even though i don't need that dll
Visual Studio will usually remove unneeded DLLs. Typically this is caused by dependencies (which are harder to keep track of).
I want to remove it.
Check in the References of the project in the Solution Explorer. If any of them have a yellow triangle that means they can't be found (the project may still compile and run if you aren't actually using that reference).
is it possibly in a cache?
As Daniel Kelley mentioned C:\Windows\assembly and C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\assembly are where the global assembly cache is located. If it isn't there check the Hint Path of the reference (it will show up in Properties).
Good luck finding your reference, keep in mind that you need not only the actual DLL but all of its used references in most cases. Also a decompiler like DotPeek can be useful if you need a more discreet way of looking at references.
I am calling a static method on a class like
Foo.bar()
Visual studio's intellisense recognizes Foo and autocompletes bar for me (it highlights Foo and everything like it is working fine). Everything looks fine until I go to build the project, and it throws an error saying the name Foo doesn't exist in current context.
I am using this static method call in other files, so I know the class is ok. The situation is too big to post code, so I am mostly looking for reasons to start looking into that would cause intellisense to function normally but get errors on compile like this.
I've seen this error caused by differing versions of the .NET framework in the different projects. The Class Library I built was 4.5 and the application was 4.0, but the only error it gave was namespace errors. Changing the framework version on the class library and rebuilding it, then the application, resolved the error.
This can occur when namespaces, classes and variables become tangled when they have the same name. I have suffered with this before. Intellisense told me I was right, the compiler told me I was wrong! I trusted the compiler!
You have 2 options that I can think of
Search your code for Foo, and see it it is being used for something other than the static class.
Fully qualify the Foo.bar() call. MyApplication.This.That.Foo.bar();
Do it in that order...it's better to elegantly resolve the issue so you can just call Foo.bar() as this is more readable and maintainable than having MyApplication.This.That.Foo.bar(); all over the place!
In my case I was missing a } at the end of one of the methods in the middle of the code which was causing the program not see the rest of the code and complain about the Methods I have defined after that point.
Old thread I know, but I've encountered this issue when referencing a static method from within a unit test project - intellisense said the method was there, but when I tried to build/run the test (in Debug mode) I got the error 'name doesn't exist in current context'. In order to fix it I had to rebuild the project containing the referenced static method in Debug configuration (it had only previously been built in Release configuration) - after this the test built and ran OK.
I know this is a bit old topic, but I just experienced the same and for me it was because the file was not actually included in the solution.
I properly happened because I had renamed the class and then the file, which caused Visual Studio to still know the class and the namespace, but the compiler did not get the file as the renamed file was not included.
Consider doing a Clean and then a Build on the project with the problem. It is possible for the editor and Intellisense to correctly discover the class, while the compiler works with files that are out-of-date. (I had this same problem, and that's how I resolved it.)
this is an old article I know, but I just encountered this issue and has been puzzling me for couple of days, and eventually got to it: click on the class file, in Solution Explorer, then look at the Properties tab; make sure Build Action is set to "Compile".
Adjust the related file. If the error code in Default.aspx.cs, you need to change the top line in the file Default.aspx as below:
Replace "CodeFile=" with "CodeBehind"
Hope this can help.
-Thanks, Thai_FUV
I have run into this probelm a few times and so when I do, the first thing I check is if the assembly not recognized has any Nuget packages. In my cases they always have and I simply forgot to install the same packages in the assembly of which the reference to the un-recognized assembly is in. A re-build command and problem fixed. I hope this helps someone. This same error message can be given for multiple things so this particular case, may not apply. If you have not used Nuget than I would suggest trying the other answers
I also was running into this issue creating a data access layer and had static methods being called with the same symptoms: Intellisense finding it but not the compiler. I tried many of the above, including fixing the .Net version.
When adding the source files to the project I also changed the namespace.
With the file with the issue, I forgot to change the namespace to match when it was imported at another time.
Closing all tabs of MonoDevelop. Then Closing MonoDevelop. Finally opening MonoDevelop again solved the problem for me.
Mine was a little more convoluted solution. Project A referenced projects B and C: both references had Copy Local to true and both produced assemblies with identical names. When building the referencing project, the output assemblies from projects B and C were copied and one overwrote the other because they had the same name. VS was then looking for the references within the build directory and only found the assembly that had "won."
In my case I had to reload the project that was marked "missing".
Project > Unload Project
Project > Load Project
Clean, Build Solution
My solution to this problem that occurs every now and then:
Find the class that is giving you problems in the Solution Explorer and "Exclude From Project"
Rebuild that assembly (let's call it "A")
The project that used the file ("B") will ask you to "Reload" project, wait
Add the file back into assembly A, that you just removed it from, and rebuild
Now, reload project B
Then the file was found in VS and all was well.
Changing the id of the control resolved the issue for me. Apparently the id of the control existed in another part of the solution.
In my case, I was missing the following lines in my csproj file
<PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|AnyCPU'">
<DefineConstants>TRACE</DefineConstants>
<DebugType>full</DebugType>
<DebugSymbols>true</DebugSymbols>
</PropertyGroup>
Once I added this, I could see the variables while debugging
My C# project - we'll call it the SuperUI - used to make use of a class from an external assembly. Now it doesn't, but the compiler won't let me build the project without the assembly reference in place. Let me elaborate.
This project used to throw and catch a custom exception class - the SuperException - which was derived from the standard System.Exception and lived in a separate, precompiled assembly, SuperAssembly.DLL, which I referenced.
Eventually, I decided this was a pointless exercise and replaced all SuperExceptions with a System.SuitableStandardException in each case. I removed the reference to SuperException.DLL, but am now met with the following on trying to compile the project:
The type 'SuperException' is defined in an assembly that is not referenced. You must add a reference to assembly 'SuperException, Version=1.1.0.0 (...)'
The source file referenced by the error doesn't seem relevant; it's the project namespace that gets highlighted in the IDE.
Now, here's the thing:
All uses of SuperException have been eliminated from the project's code.
Compared to another project that compiles fine without a reference to SuperException.DLL, I only reference one more assembly - and that references nothing that my project doesn't reference itself. While it's possible that any of these dependencies could throw SuperExceptions, I'm only catching the base Exception class and in any case... the other project builds fine!
I've done Visual Studio's "Clean Solution" and cleared everything out by hand, many times.
It's not the end of the world to include this reference, I just don't see why it's necessary any more. Nrrrgg. Any pointers welcome!
It's likely a transitive reference, where some type method call returns an instance of SuperException boxed ("downcast") as e.g. Exception, but from inspecting the code in the transitively included code, i.e. code from your external method calls, the compiler knows that you need to be able to have information about that type at some point.
Resharper would tell you where it's the case that you need to add a reference, and you could use Lütz Roeder's aka RedGate's Reflector to scan compiled IL for a reference to this type in two ways: 1) use the search-facility, 2) open each public type you're using and for that one which requires the "ghost" assembly, it will ask you to specify its location.
This most often happends to me when I reference Castle.Windsor but not Castle.MicroKernel. :p
Exit Visual Studio
Delete the bin and obj Folders in your solution directory
Restart and see what happens
I agree with the other comments here.. There is a reference, in plain text somewhere !
I have had similar problems in the past where searching through the project files returned nothing, turns out it was in some other file that wasn't automatically picked up in the search.
I don't think that creating a new project is the solution here.. You need to be positive that NONE of the references in your dependency tree use SuperException.. NONE
I have never experienced this to the point where I have needed to literally wipe the project, I have always found the reference somewhere. Ensure you are searching every file.
EDIT:
Just a point to add, if the location pointed to by the error seems random, that can often mean there is a mismatch between the compiled source and the source code file.. Is this a ASP.NET application? I have had it before where the compiled DLL's haven't been replaced on a rebuild in the ASP.NET temp folder causing things to get.. Interesting when debugging :)
I don't think this is a code issue. What I can see happening is that one of your existing references probably rely on that type in their own types which you are probably creating in your application.
If that is the case you do need that reference even if you don't explicitly use the type and even though the other referenced assembly has its own reference. You sometimes get that issue with 3rd party components which need references to types that you haven't referenced. The compiler is obviously seeing something in one of your existing referenced assemblies and is expecting you to referenced the dependent one.
Since it's a compiler error, there must be a reference or use of SuperException somewhere in the project.
Do a find/replace in the entire project or solution for that type and remove every reference (it's possible you already did this).
If you reference any types that inherits from SuperException (even if the type defined in another assembly), you need a reference to the assembly that SuperException is defined in.
Take the line that the compiler is showing the error on and start tracing the inheritance tree of the objects used on that line, you might find the source of it that way.
Thanks for your answers so far. I've tried every suggestion (except one) to no avail.
The suggestion I haven't tried is to create a new project and add all my stuff to it, the thought of which really tests my will to live. ;) I may try this tomorrow if I can be bothered. Thanks again.
There is really nothing very mysterious about VS projects nowadays - it's all text files, etc. SOMETHING must reference that class/dll, and that something must be part of your project.
Have you really grep'd or findstr'd the whole solution tree, every single file, for a reference to that exception?
This sounds pretty strange. Here's what I would check next:
Check that there's nothing lingering in your Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs file.
Check that there's nothing lingering in your SuperUI.csproj file.
Delete all references and re-add them.
Try creating a new project, and adding all your classes to it.
grep your project folder. It could be a hidden reference in your project, or a project that your project references. Cleanse with Notepad if needed.
If you reference any types that inherits from SuperException (even if the type defined in another assembly), you need a reference to the assembly that SuperException is defined in.
Seconded on that.
You might not be referencing SuperException, but you might be referencing SpecializedSuperException, which is derived from, or somehow otherwise uses SuperException - your grep of the project for SuperException won't be catching it though.
Try have a hack with the trial of NDepend
This is where tools like Resharper really pay off -- a simple Find Usages usually tells me of such "ghost dependencies" several times.
Maybe you could go to your definition of the SuperException class and try to Find All References(). You might also want to investigate if the assembly SuperException is has a circular dependency on your main assembly (e.g., main assembly depends on exception assembly depends on main assembly...).
I’ve had a very similar assembly reference issue that was happening when my C# library had a dependent C++/CLI assembly.
The problem that was I was inheriting a public class from that C++/CLI assembly in my C# assembly library. That meant that the inheritance chain was spanning across multiple assemblies.
I was hoping that any client would be smart enough to indirectly load the C++/CLI assembly any time the C# library needed it, but that was not the case even at compile time.
I got rid of this problem by breaking the inheritance between the classes that were spanning across those two assembly libraries and using aggregation instead.
My client was finally happy and did not require the C++/CLI assembly as a dependency anymore.
In your word you would probably have to make sure that SuitableStandardException does not inherit from SuperException in order to eliminate the SuperException.DLL as a reference.
Use encapsulation instead of inheritance and create a SuperException data member in your new SuitableStandardException.
If that does not solve it, you might have more classes spanning inheritance across some assemblies, in your case SuperAssembly.DLL and superException.dll.
If you can't find all of them try this trick:
Make all your public members and classes in SuperAssembly.DLL internal.
In the SuperAssembly.DLL make friends with SuperException.DLL:
[assembly:InternalsVisibleTo("SuperException, PublicKey=0024000004800000....)]
Make sure that they build and remove the SuperAssembly.DLL reference from any client that already references SuperException.DLL.
grep -R SuperException * in the base of your project (get grep from somewhere first) just to be sure.