I have a WinForm application. On the main form there are a number of controls, such as labels, textboxes, etc.
If I have another class, within the same assembly, how can I access those controls?
For example from my new class, I want to update a label in Form1?
In the property of the label (or any control) set the "Modifiers" option to "Public"
Now you can access the label from the object of the Form
Form1 f = new Form1()
f.lblMyLabel.Text = "My Text"
One way would be to create public properties in your Form1 class that expose the controls you are trying to modify
For example, if your Label is called label1 in the designer then you could do something like this:
public Label MyForm1Label { get { return label1; } }
select the control which you wants to access from another class/form. go to its property and set its modifiers value to "internal" (if you want to use it only in same assembly) .
now where ever in same assembly you wants to use it just create an object of that form like
myForm objform = new myForm();
objform.txtName.Text="any text";
then you can show that form using objform.show(); or objform.showdialog();
but i think this will not solve you issue because what i feel is that your form is already showing on screen and from another form/class you wants to change its label/textbox's value
so for this you will have to take that current object of form otherwise it will not show any changes on currently showing form.
so i think singleton pattern will give you perfect solution.
just create class and in that class create a static object of that form and than create a static function and check if object is already initialized that do not initialize it and use existing otherwise initialize it.
there are lots of other solutions also exists like by creating public property but you will have to use reference of same object of currently showing form to see changes reflect to currently showing form
Apart from the solutions which were already mentioned you can create some public method to your Form that will provide desired functionality (Might be good if some change has to be displayed in several controls - your other classes don't have to remember which one to change)
public void SetSomething(int value)
{
Control1.value = value;
Control2.value = value;
...
}
The easyiest way is to use:
Form1 f = new Form1()
f.lblMyLabel.Text = "My Text"
Therefore, you have to set the Form1 Label "lblMyLabel" just to public. I have done it with a richTextBox.
enter image description here
Related
I am building some applications that use OPC to control some industrial automation. I have decided it might be a good idea to create some custom controls for standard things I will use such as buttons and text boxes. One of my main reasons was that I felt in an ideal pattern the end object i.e. the button is the one who holds information about the OPC item it refers to otherwise in a typical application my Form class gets polluted by tons of variables that are in my mind scoped more global then they should. I started then by using the Tag property of the button but this requires some overhead code that is the same for each instance. I felt like the right thing to do is subclass controls that I would like to use and provide properties to configure each one.
With that context in mind my real question is this. To make it as portable as possible I decided there should a property to define the OPC Group. I declared a property like this
public class OPCButton : Button
{
[Category("OPC")]
public OPCConnectedGroup
{
get { return _OPCGroup; }
set { _OPCGroup = value; }
}
}
This shows up int the property list when I add the control but I am unable to bind this property even though my Form1 contains
public OPCConnectedGroup Connection1 = new OPCConnectedGroup();
I have resolved that the way to solve this is to probably create an additional control like OPCGrp that can be added to a Form then the Controls can reference this. To test I added a property of type Button and sure enough when I added it and browsed to the property it gave me options for all the buttons on the Form. I have no huge problems with this approach I just want to make sure that Im following a prototypical pattern because I will be responsible for maintaining the control library but not always implementing and Im trying to get it down to a 1-2 step process to implement a control.
Thanks
Matt
When defining OPCConnectedGroup you can inherit Component class.
This way if you have a property of type OPCConnectedGroup in your OPCButton, then at design time, you can put instances of OPCConnectedGroup on the form, and then if you choose your OPCButton at designer, that property of type OPCConnectedGroup will show as a drop down list that you can select one of instances that you put on the form for it.
Example:
If I have such MyButton and MyClass:
public class MyButton : Button
{
public MyClass MyClassInstance { get; set; }
}
public class MyClass : Component
{
public string SomeProperty {get;set;}
}
Then you can put some (or one) instance of MyClass on the component tray of the form:
And then if you select MyButton on your form, you can choose one of MyClass instances from in property grid:
I'm almost done doing a Connect4 game with VS2012 using WinForms. Everything is working well but I wanted to bring the options for the user on a dedicated Start Menu window. On that menu I have two comboBoxes I need to take the text from to use them as a value for two variables in my other form (the game window). I also have one New Game button that should call a method from my other form if that's possible (basically, I made an "Initialization()" method in my game form and I'd like it to be launched when I click the "New Game" button on the other form).
I only found tutorials that show how to do very basic things from one form to an other (such as labeling texts) but I I didn't find an answer to my specific problem.
I used this in my main form to instantiate the menu form
public FormMenu myMenu;
myMenu = new FormMenu();
What I want to do is that I could do something like this in the other form :
amountOfRows = Int32.Parse(myMenu.comboBoxRows.Text);
amountOfColumns = Int32.Parse(myMenu.comboBoxColumns.Text);
Any idea how I could do that?
I would love to see some example code so I can help see where your confusion lies. WinForms requires the other form to be instantiated.
OtherForm form = new OtherForm();
Once the form is instantiated you should be able to run code from it.
EDIT:
Based on your implementation I would suggest making public methods within FormMenu that return these int values.
public int ReturnRows()
{
return Int32.Parse(myMenu.comboBoxRows.Text);
}
public int ReturnColumns()
{
return Int32.Parse(myMenu.comboBoxColumns.Text);
}
Then from the other form in which myMenu is instantiated you can call myMenu.ReturnRows() and myMenu.ReturnColumns()
The easiest way would be to store a reference to your form in the menue as a variable. (you already named it myMenu)
Then you should create the property/properties you need in the form an add a setter for the values. (see example here)
Last you update the form fields with
myMenu.property = newvalue;
That`s all about it
Suppose I create a window form Form.cs. It has some controls(label1, label2, button1, button1 etc.). I also create a new window form New_Form.cs under Form.cs. Now I want to access label1, label2, button1 in New_Form.cs. How can I do this?
I don't want to be offensive, but I think that using control from another form is not a good design.
In my oppinion it is not good to couple one class (in this question form1) to the inner implementation of another class (controls of `form2ยด. If you, for some reason, have to change the inner design (e.g. showing the data with a different control) of that class, you have to change the other class too. That makes coding (and of course error searching) quite difficult.
If there is a need to exchange data between two classes, I would prefer using publioc Properties for that. In the inner design you can attach them to a control, but then this "coupling" stays in the same class)
Although this can be bad design, you can access properties in another Form by making them public and then accessing them like this:
Form1 frm = new Form1();
Form1.button1.Visible = false;
Also here is an msdn page pertaining to your question
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/f6525896%28v=vs.90%29.aspx
You can access the required properties by setting them as public properties in your Parent form. Not sure as why you would want the button, if you want some thing to be executed for the click then you should encapsulate the logic into separate methods and them make the call.
If you have fewer details to pass then make constructors for the new form which would accept those values
ChildForm child = new ChildForm([label1], [label2])
or
ChildForm child = new ChildForm([parent form reference]) // so you could access require components
I have a simple user control with a text box and label in it. I created public properties to access the text in the textbox when I use the user control in another form.
My problem is the property is returning null value when I call it in the form. Am i missing anything?
My property is as follows::
public partial class UserControl1 : UserControl
{
public UserControl1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public string rtnTxtMake
{
get
{
return txtMake.Text;
}
set
{
txtMake.Text = value;
}
}
}
and in the next forms button click event i call the property as follows
UserControl1 Usc = new UserControl1();
string Make = Usc.rtnTxtMake;
MessageBox.Show(Make)
UserControl1 Usc = new UserControl1();
string Make = Usc.rtnTxtMake;
If your user control has by default an empty textbox field, then it seems correct that the above two lines of code would return either null or String.Empty (check via String.IsNullOrEmpty), since you explicitly create a new instance of your user control.
I suppose what you really want is this:
You have inserted a user control into a form in the Designer. Let's call this user control instance ctlUser.
You have a button with a Click event handler. The last few lines of code in your question are from that handler method.
In the handler, you wouldn't create a new instance of your user control (Usc) but refer to the one that you previously inserted into your form, ctlUser. Then things should work as expected.
Your UserControl must be added to the Controls collection of a parent Form/Control before it can be properly initialized. Normally you would not write the code yourself that creates and adds the UserControl.
Instead, first build your project, then go to the Deisgner view of your main form and look at the Toolbox.
Your UserControl name (and an icon) should appear towards the top of the toolbox, and you can simply drag it to the main form. The Windows Forms designer will automatically generate the needed initialization code for you.
You should not create a new instance of your control in your button click event handler. Using the Designer approach to create your control you can simply access the existing instance of your control as follows:
public void button_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// myUserControl1 has already been created and initialized by the Deisgner generated code
// Note the name 'myUserControl1' is just an example, yours may be different.
string controlText=myUserControl1.rtnTxtMake;
// Or to change the UserControl textbox value
myUserControl1.rtnTxtMake="Testing";
}
What exactly to you mean when you say that the property is returning a null value? Is it actually null, or is your MessageBox simple showing empty?
I quickly duplicated your code and it behaves exactly as expected - the MessageBox shows, but it is empty because the default value of the Text property of the TextBox control is an empty string.
Also, the way you are approaching this is a little unusual.
Firstly, the line:
UserControl1 Usc = new UserControl1();
You do not generally need to instantiate a user control like this. Instead you can drag the control from the toolbox onto the design surface of your form. This will then take care of instantiating and initialising your control for you.
I think that this is actually your problem - when you include the line of code above, you are creating a new instance of the user control, and this is is no way realted to the user control that you have dragged onto the designer.
If you go to the designer view of your form and click on the user control, you should see a properties window somehere. If you do no, then either select it from the View menu, or press F4. In the list of properties, there should be one "Name" this is the programatic name generated for your user control. You can change this here if you want, but when you refer to this control in the rest of the form, this is what you must use.
Secondly, the next two lines:
string Make = Usc.rtnTxtMake;
MessageBox.Show(Make)
You can access the property rtnTxtMake directly. Unless you later need to access the Make string in the rest of your code, then directly accessing the property would usually be considered better style.
MessageBox.Show(userControl.rtnTxtMake);
I have a Form and a UserControl. The UserControl has a menu, and the form has a tabstrip (General, Food, Vitamins etc).
In the UserControl, I have the following code: (Form name is frmForm, the tab names in the form are tabGeneral,tabFood, tabVitamins)
frmForm fm=new frmForm();
fm.tabMain.Selected=tabVitamins;
I call these line from the UserControl to capture the tab to get selected on the form, but it does not select the vitamins tab.
Where am I going wrong? I have access specifier as Protected Internal for tabs in the form.
Please advice.
Thanks,
Karthick
When you write new frmForm(), you're creating a completely new instance of frmForm, which is then discarded.
To get the frmForm instance that holds your control, call the FindForm() method and cast to frmForm.
For example:
frmForm myForm = FindForm() as frmForm;
if(myForm != null)
myForm.tabMain.SelectedTab = myForm.tabVitamins;
If the control is on some other form, this code won't do anything.
By the way, Hungarian notation is frowned upon in .Net.
Your form should probably be named something like MainForm.
SLaks has correctly pointed out your fundamental error, and given you a valid example of a way, via a call to the method 'FindForm, to get the Form the UserControl is sited on.
It may be valuable to you to keep in mind that a UserControl (and all Controls) also has a 'Parent property, but, of course, a UserControl could be placed inside another Control on a Form (like your UserControl could be inside a Panel on the Form) : in that case the UserControl's Parent would be the control it's inside on the Form (like, a Panel), not the Form itself, but 'FindForm will do the right thing to get you the Form it's on.
However you are calling a Method every time you use 'FindForm, and "best practice" suggests that what you want to do is to "inject" a reference to the Form into the UserControl at run-time so that it can always access its Form property easily, without calling a 'Method.
In your example, on a practical level, this (calling the Method) may make almost no difference in performance, but, imho, as you get to a place with WinForms and .NET where you might have a UserControl that will need access to its Parent Form very frequently, this will pay off, and it's a better way to structure your code in the long run, for maintenance.
Wes showed you one way you can "embed" (inject) the UserControl's hosting Form : using an overloaded constructor for the UserControl. But that requires you to modify the Designer.cs file in standard WinForms, and I strongly advise you against that, even though it will work. Particularly if you are just "getting your feet on the ground" in .NET, I strongly advise you against modifying it, or anything having to do with the Form's constructor and its internal call to : InitializeComponent();
Also, as you progress with WinForms you are going to meet many situations where you are going to want instances of "objects" (a Control, a Form, an instance of a Class) to contain references to other instances of "objects.
If you can understand and use one simple use of "injection" here, you are going to make progress to make yourself ready to handle more complex .Net programming in the future.
Another way is to put a Public Property in the UserControl that can be set in code from the MainForm. In the UserControl something like :
private frmForm ParentForm;
public frmForm UCParentForm
{
set { ParentForm = value; }
}
So then in your main form's code, perhaps in the Load event like this :
private void frmForm_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
TheUserControl.UCParentForm = this;
}
or when you need to, you set the UserControl's 'ParentForm property once. So you have eliminated using the method 'FindForm().
In this case, if you only want access to a specific control on the UserControl's Parent Form, like a TabControl, you might consider that you want to make the Property you set of type TabControl, rather than Form : the same coding technique shown above can be used in the UserControl :
private TabControl mainFormTabControl;
public TabControl MainFormTabControl
{
set { mainFormTabControl = value; }
}
imho, it is when you are creating UserControls dynamically at run-time, using an overloaded constructor, as Wes suggests, is the best strategy. And using overloaded constructors has many, many others uses in .NET that you'll get into.
good luck !
You should not be creating a new frmForm() inside the user control. You could pass a reference to the frmForm to the user control.
In your user control constructor try something like this.
private frmForm fm;
public YourUserControl(frmForm fm)
{
this.fm = fm;
}
Then you could use.
fm.tabMain.Selected=tabVitamins;
Does that help?