I'm trying what should be an easy bind in my user control:
<UserControl x:Class="MyApp.FlowNode" ...>
<StackPanel>
<Label Content="{Binding Path=Header, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}" />
</StackPanel>
</UserControl>
With the underlying code being:
public partial class FlowNode : UserControl
{
public FlowNode()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public string Header { get { return "Testing"; } };
}
However, the label stays blank. What am I doing wrong?
{RelativeSource Self} refers to the Label instance, not your user control.
Instead of using a RelativeSource, you should set the UserControl's DataContext to itself, as karmicpuppet suggested.
Try to use
{Binding Path=Header, RelativeSource={RelativeSource FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type FlowNode}}}.
In your constructor, set the DataContext of the UserControl to itself. "this.DataContext = this". And remove the RelativeSource in your binding.
The most convenient way to get access to 'Me'/'this' in xaml in my opinion is to put a Name on your control :
< UserControl
x:Class="MyApp.FlowNode"
...
Name="MyFlowNode" >
And then, if you bind to your control's property or dp, you use ElementName syntax.
So you don't break the DataContext of your control.
There might be a way with RelativeSource FindAncestor binding, but i don't see advantages over that one.
But do not set DataContext of your Control to itself, otherwise it will loose awareness of its DataContext.
Related
I have a UserControl that I want to participate in data binding. I've set up the dependency properties in the user control, but can't get it work.
The uc displays the correct text when I call it with static text (e.g BlueText="ABC") . When i try to bind it to a local public property, it is always blank.
<src:BlueTextBox BlueText="Feeling blue" /> <!--OK-->
<src:BlueTextBox BlueText="{Binding Path=MyString}" /> <!--UserControl always BLANK!-->
<TextBox Text="{Binding Path=MyString}" Width="100"/> <!--Simple TextBox Binds OK-->
I've boiled the code down to the following simplified example. Here is the XAML of the UserControl:
<UserControl x:Class="Binding2.BlueTextBox" ...
<Grid>
<TextBox x:Name="myTextBox" Text="{Binding BlueText}" Foreground="Blue" Width="100" Height="26" />
</Grid>
Here is the code behind of the UserControl:
public partial class BlueTextBox : UserControl
{
public BlueTextBox()
{
InitializeComponent();
DataContext = this; // shouldn't do this - see solution
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty BlueTextProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("BlueText", typeof(string), typeof(BlueTextBox));
public string BlueText
{
get { return GetValue(BlueTextProperty).ToString(); }
set { SetValue( BlueTextProperty, value.ToString() ); }
}
This seems like it should be really easy, but I can't make it work. Thanks for your help!
More info: When i was trying the fix suggested by Eugene, I noticed some peculiar behavior. I added a PropertyChangedCallback to the metadata; this allows me to watch the value of BlueText getting set. When setting the string to a static value (="feeling blue") the PropertyChanged event fires. The data binding case does not fire PropertyChanged. I think this means the data-bound value is not getting sent to the UserControl. (I think the constructor does not get called in the static case)
Solution: The problems were correctly identified by Arcturus and jpsstavares. First, I was overwriting the data binding when is set DataContext=this in the constructor of the control. This prevented the data bound value from getting set. I also had to name the control x:Name=root, and specify the Binding ElementName=root int the XAML. To get the TwoWay binding, I needed to set Mode=TwoWay in the caller. Here is the correct code:
<src:BlueTextBox BlueText="{Binding Path=MyString, Mode=TwoWay}}" /> <!--OK-->
Now the XAML in the UserControl:
<UserControl x:Class="Binding2.BlueTextBox" x:Name="root"...
<Grid>
<TextBox x:Name="myTextBox" Text="{Binding ElementName=root, Path=BlueText}" Foreground="Blue" Width="100" Height="26" />
</Grid>
Finally I removed the DataContext=this in the constructor of the UserControl.
public BlueTextBox()
{
InitializeComponent();
//DataContext = this; -- don't do this
}
Thanks everyone for the tremendous help!
You set the DataContext in the Control to itself, thus overwriting the DataContext when using this Control in other controls. Taking your binding as example in your situation:
<src:BlueTextBox BlueText="{Binding Path=MyString}" />
Once loaded and all the Datacontext is set, it will look for the path MyString in your BlueTextBox thing control due to you setting the DataContext to it. I guess this is not how you intended this to work ;).
Solution:
Change the text binding either one of the 2 bindings:
{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type src:BlueTextBox}}, Path=BlueText}
or
Name your control Root (or something like that)
<UserControl x:Name="Root"
{Binding ElementName=Root, Path=BlueText}
And remove the
DataContext = this;
from the constructor of your UserControl and it should work like a charm..
I think in this case you need to set the ElementName property in the binding. Something like this:
<UserControl x:Class="Binding2.BlueTextBox" x:Name="blueTextBox"...
<Grid>
<TextBox x:Name="myTextBox" Text="{Binding ElementName=blueTextBox, Path=BlueText}" Foreground="Blue" Width="100" Height="26" />
</Grid>
Possibly you need to add to your property FrameworkPropertyMetadata where specify FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.AffectsRender and AffectsMeasure.
FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions enumeration MSDN article
I know this is an old topic but still.
Also mention the PropertyChangedCallback on the UIPropertyMetadata during registering your DP
I have a simple data template in an UserControl composed of a TextBlock and two buttons. The DataContext is set to a list of objects. One button and the TextBlock are bound to properties of that object, but I need one button to be bound to a property of the UserControl.
Can I use RelativeSource to try and find the UC's class, and get the property that way? Something like this:
{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type MyUserControlClass}}, Path=SomeProperty}
At the top of the UserControl give it:
x:Name="MyUserControl"
Then to access the property you can simply use:
"{Binding ElementName=MyUserControl, Path=SomeProperty}"
My application looks like the following
The black is my MainWindow, the red is a tab control and the yellow is a UserControl.
The UserControl has many Dependency Properties defined and they bind to the DataContext (Which is set in the MainWindow's code behind, using this.DataContext = this).
To bind my UserControl to the same DataContext as my MainWindow, in my UserControl xaml I have the following
DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorLevel=1,AncestorType=Window}}"
This works great, and when I interact with my UserControl, due to the two way binding, it updates the Properties of my MainWindow, which in turn updates my TabControl!
The issue is, my UserControl now has some extra functionality and as such, needs to bind to the UserControl's code behind (such as values for the GUI).
This is where I'm stuck. I can't bind from my UserControl to my code behind because I've already created a DataContext.
I know I could use the WinForms approach, and name each control with x:Name="MyControl" like
MyControl.Text = "This value";
or
MyControl.DataContext = this;
Yeuk I think!!
My question is, is this the only way to go, or can I still use binding.
First of all you don't need to manually set DataContext on UserControl. DataContext is an inheritable property so it will inherit DataContext from its parent unless you have explicitly set it.
Get rid of DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorLevel=1,AncestorType=Window}}" from your UserControl.
And now, in case you want to bind to code behind for some controls in your UserControl, you can bind using RelativeSource or can set DataContext on control:
DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor,
AncestorType=UserControl}}"
If controls can be clubbed together under one panel, set DataContext on parent panel say Grid and child controls will inherit from it:
<Grid DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor,
AncestorType=UserControl}}">
..Child Controls here will inherit DataContext
</Grid>
And to answer your question:
MyControl.DataContext = this; <-- Is this possible
Yes, it is possible like i mentioned above.
You can just use another RelativeSource Binding as you have for the MainWindow properties... to access the properties defined in the UserControl, try the following XAML in your UserControl:
<TextBlock Text="{Binding UserControlProperty, RelativeSource={RelativeSource
AncestorType={x:Type YourXmlNamespacePrefix:YourUserControl}}}" />
Obviously, you'll need to update YourXmlNamespacePrefix:YourUserControl to a valid XML Namespace and control type to get this to work.
I'm not saying either that you should set the DataContext anywhere, or change any properties. This is a RelativeSource Binding... you do not need to set any DataContext to make it work. I thought you would have known that seeing as you're already using one. Just try the example out.
I have a private field
private static Double myValue;
in the application MainWindow class. And there (in the MainWindow class) I defined a property
public static Double MytValue
{
get { return myValue; }
}
In the structure of the MainWindow class I have a TextBox. I'm in need of binding it to the MytValue property. In XAML I write:
<TextBox Name="tbxMyValue" Grid.Row="1" Grid.Column="2" TextAlignment="Center"
Text="{Binding Path=MyValue}" Width="Auto" Margin="10,0,10,15" IsEnabled="True" />
But it has no effect. I see nothing in the TextBox while myValue variable has a value. Why? Please help me.
I like to set the DataContext in the Window section
<Window x:Class="Gabe3a.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:local="clr-namespace:Gabe3a"
xmlns:scm="clr-namespace:System.ComponentModel;assembly=WindowsBase"
xmlns:System="clr-namespace:System;assembly=mscorlib"
DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource self}}"
Title="Gabriel Main Ver 3a01" Icon="faviconw.ico" Height="600" Width="800">
You need to set the DataContext behind the Window for that binding to work
There are two layers to an application with WPF: the UI layer and the data layer.
The Data layer for an application starts out as null, and you can set it using the DataContext property.
Whenever you do a basic binding in WPF, you are binding to the DataContext. So Text="{Binding Path=MyValue}" is actually saying "Get the MyValue property from the current DataContext".
You could simply set the DataContext in your code behind:
MyWindow.DataContext = this;
Or you can use a RelativeSource binding to tell WPF to get the MyValue property from somewhere else, such as telling it to get it from the closest Window it finds when navigating up the VisualTree:
Text="{Binding Path=MyValue, RelativeSource={
RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type Window}}}"
I actually have an article on my blog about the DataContext that I'd recommend reading if you're new to WPF and the DataContext: What is this "DataContext" you speak of?
It's not how it works. Binding to static properties; {Binding Source={x:Static local:Application.MyValue}}
Note that your field needs to be property & public. If you want to go with your solution, you need to set DataContext as {RelativeSource Self}.
In file MainWindow.xaml.cs in constructor add this line:
DataContext = this;
after InitializeComponent();
I have a window which has a usercontrol in it . This usercontrol's RequestObject property bound to SearchArgumentObject property of ViewModel of the window.
This is listing from my window class
<Grid DataContext="{Binding SearchArgumentObject, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}">
<guiLib:RegCardSearchForm x:Name="SearchParametrsUC" Grid.Row="1" RequestObject="{Binding .,Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" />
</Grid>
In Usercontrol class I created dependency property:
This is listing from my userControl class
public static DependencyProperty RequestObjectProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("RequestObject", typeof(RegistrationCardSearch), typeof(RegCardSearchForm));
public RegistrationCardSearch RequestObject
{
get
{
return (RegistrationCardSearch)GetValue(RequestObjectProperty);
}
set
{
SetValue(RequestObjectProperty, value);
}
}
On the level of the usecontrol everything works fine and RequestOject property changed.
But in my window class I can't see modification of SearchArgumentObject property which was made in usercontrol.
How can I get modefied property value? I think answer to this question is very trivial but I can't find solution.
Setting the DataContext on the Grid isn't doing anything but breaking the two-way linking of your properties. Skip the extra step and bind the VM property to the control property that you want to pick up changes from instead:
<Grid>
<guiLib:RegCardSearchForm x:Name="SearchParametrsUC" Grid.Row="1"
RequestObject="{Binding SearchArgumentObject, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" />
</Grid>
The code for your Window class is setting the DataContext of the Grid to a property obtained from a binding to a property on another object's DataContext further up the tree. Do you have the Window's DataContext set elsewhere?
Let's say that the object which is supplying the SearchArgumentObject is named SearchWindowViewModel. In the code-behind of the Window, you would have the following code (in the constructor, for example):
DataContext = new SearchWindowViewModel();
Now, all the properties that SearchWindowViewModel exposes are available to the Window. To bind the SearchWindowViewModel.SearchArgumentObject to the UserControl's RequestObject property, you would have the following XAML:
<Grid>
<guiLib:RegCardSearchForm x:Name=SearchParametersUC Grid.Row=1
RequestObject={Binding SearchArgumentObject />
</Grid>
If you don't want to set the Window's DataContext, you can set the Grid's DataContext using the same type of code as I used above, and the binding in the XAML would remain the same.
Hope that helps.