Develop Reference

Using reflection on generics recursively

I have the following classes:
public class BaseDataEntity
{
private List<string> _Changes = new List<string>();
public IEnumerable<string> GetChanges()
{
return _Changes;
}
public bool HasDataChanged
{
get { return (GetChanges().Count() > 0); }
}
public bool HasChildRecords
{
get { return (GetType().GetChildRecords().Count() > 0); }
}
}
public class ChildRecords : IList<T> where T : BaseDataEntity
{
}
And a few helper methods:
public static PropertyInfo[] GetChildRecords(this Type aType)
{
return aType.GetProperties().Where(pi => pi.IsChildRecords()).ToArray();
}
public static bool IsChildRecords(this PropertyInfo info)
{
return (info.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(ChildRecordsAttribute), false).Length > 0);
}
What I'm trying to do is implement a property called HaveChildRecordsChanged using reflection. My question is how would I go about using reflection to check the HasDataChanged property of all ChildRecords of arbitrary depth?
I tried something like:
var isChanged = false;
foreach (var info in GetType().GetChildRecords())
{
var childRecordObject = info.GetValue(this, null);
var childRecords = childRecordObject as ChildRecords<BaseDataEntity>; //cannot unbox this, it evaluates as null
if (null != childRecords && childRecords.Any(x => x.HasDataChanged))
{
isChanged = true; //never hit
}
}
return isChanged;

ChildRecords<T> is generic so ChildRecords<Company> can't be cast to ChildRecords<BaseDataEntity>.
Since you already filter the property marked with the ChildRecordsAttribute the simplest solution would be to cast to IEnumerable and use OfType<BaseDataEntity>()
var childRecords = childRecordObject as IEnumerable; // IList<T> will be IEnumerable
if (null != childRecords && childRecords.OfType<BaseDataEntity>().Any(x => x.HasDataChanged))
{
isChanged = true;
}

How can I get the value of properties in nested classes using Reflection? [duplicate]

Given the following objects:
public class Customer {
public String Name { get; set; }
public String Address { get; set; }
}
public class Invoice {
public String ID { get; set; }
public DateTime Date { get; set; }
public Customer BillTo { get; set; }
}
I'd like to use reflection to go through the Invoice to get the Name property of a Customer. Here's what I'm after, assuming this code would work:
Invoice inv = GetDesiredInvoice(); // magic method to get an invoice
PropertyInfo info = inv.GetType().GetProperty("BillTo.Address");
Object val = info.GetValue(inv, null);
Of course, this fails since "BillTo.Address" is not a valid property of the Invoice class.
So, I tried writing a method to split the string into pieces on the period, and walk the objects looking for the final value I was interested in. It works okay, but I'm not entirely comfortable with it:
public Object GetPropValue(String name, Object obj) {
foreach (String part in name.Split('.')) {
if (obj == null) { return null; }
Type type = obj.GetType();
PropertyInfo info = type.GetProperty(part);
if (info == null) { return null; }
obj = info.GetValue(obj, null);
}
return obj;
}
Any ideas on how to improve this method, or a better way to solve this problem?
EDIT after posting, I saw a few related posts... There doesn't seem to be an answer that specifically addresses this question, however. Also, I'd still like the feedback on my implementation.

I use following method to get the values from (nested classes) properties like
"Property"
"Address.Street"
"Address.Country.Name"
public static object GetPropertyValue(object src, string propName)
{
if (src == null) throw new ArgumentException("Value cannot be null.", "src");
if (propName == null) throw new ArgumentException("Value cannot be null.", "propName");
if(propName.Contains("."))//complex type nested
{
var temp = propName.Split(new char[] { '.' }, 2);
return GetPropertyValue(GetPropertyValue(src, temp[0]), temp[1]);
}
else
{
var prop = src.GetType().GetProperty(propName);
return prop != null ? prop.GetValue(src, null) : null;
}
}
Here is the Fiddle: https://dotnetfiddle.net/PvKRH0

I know I'm a bit late to the party, and as others said, your implementation is fine
...for simple use cases.
However, I've developed a library that solves exactly that use case, Pather.CSharp.
It is also available as Nuget Package.
Its main class is Resolver with its Resolve method.
You pass it an object and the property path, and it will return the desired value.
Invoice inv = GetDesiredInvoice(); // magic method to get an invoice
var resolver = new Resolver();
object result = resolver.Resolve(inv, "BillTo.Address");
But it can also resolve more complex property paths, including array and dictionary access.
So, for example, if your Customer had multiple addresses
public class Customer {
public String Name { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<String> Addresses { get; set; }
}
you could access the second one using Addresses[1].
Invoice inv = GetDesiredInvoice(); // magic method to get an invoice
var resolver = new Resolver();
object result = resolver.Resolve(inv, "BillTo.Addresses[1]");

I actually think your logic is fine. Personally, I would probably change it around so you pass the object as the first parameter (which is more inline with PropertyInfo.GetValue, so less surprising).
I also would probably call it something more like GetNestedPropertyValue, to make it obvious that it searches down the property stack.

You have to access the ACTUAL object that you need to use reflection on. Here is what I mean:
Instead of this:
Invoice inv = GetDesiredInvoice(); // magic method to get an invoice
PropertyInfo info = inv.GetType().GetProperty("BillTo.Address");
Object val = info.GetValue(inv, null);
Do this (edited based on comment):
Invoice inv = GetDesiredInvoice(); // magic method to get an invoice
PropertyInfo info = inv.GetType().GetProperty("BillTo");
Customer cust = (Customer)info.GetValue(inv, null);
PropertyInfo info2 = cust.GetType().GetProperty("Address");
Object val = info2.GetValue(cust, null);
Look at this post for more information:
Using reflection to set a property of a property of an object

In hopes of not sounding too late to the party, I would like to add my solution:
Definitely use recursion in this situation
public static Object GetPropValue(String name, object obj, Type type)
{
var parts = name.Split('.').ToList();
var currentPart = parts[0];
PropertyInfo info = type.GetProperty(currentPart);
if (info == null) { return null; }
if (name.IndexOf(".") > -1)
{
parts.Remove(currentPart);
return GetPropValue(String.Join(".", parts), info.GetValue(obj, null), info.PropertyType);
} else
{
return info.GetValue(obj, null).ToString();
}
}

You don't explain the source of your "discomfort," but your code basically looks sound to me.
The only thing I'd question is the error handling. You return null if the code tries to traverse through a null reference or if the property name doesn't exist. This hides errors: it's hard to know whether it returned null because there's no BillTo customer, or because you misspelled it "BilTo.Address"... or because there is a BillTo customer, and its Address is null! I'd let the method crash and burn in these cases -- just let the exception escape (or maybe wrap it in a friendlier one).

Here is another implementation that will skip a nested property if it is an enumerator and continue deeper. Properties of type string are not affected by the Enumeration Check.
public static class ReflectionMethods
{
public static bool IsNonStringEnumerable(this PropertyInfo pi)
{
return pi != null && pi.PropertyType.IsNonStringEnumerable();
}
public static bool IsNonStringEnumerable(this object instance)
{
return instance != null && instance.GetType().IsNonStringEnumerable();
}
public static bool IsNonStringEnumerable(this Type type)
{
if (type == null || type == typeof(string))
return false;
return typeof(IEnumerable).IsAssignableFrom(type);
}
public static Object GetPropValue(String name, Object obj)
{
foreach (String part in name.Split('.'))
{
if (obj == null) { return null; }
if (obj.IsNonStringEnumerable())
{
var toEnumerable = (IEnumerable)obj;
var iterator = toEnumerable.GetEnumerator();
if (!iterator.MoveNext())
{
return null;
}
obj = iterator.Current;
}
Type type = obj.GetType();
PropertyInfo info = type.GetProperty(part);
if (info == null) { return null; }
obj = info.GetValue(obj, null);
}
return obj;
}
}
based on this question and on
How to know if a PropertyInfo is a collection
by Berryl
I use this in a MVC project to dynamically Order my data by simply passing the Property to sort by
Example:
result = result.OrderBy((s) =>
{
return ReflectionMethods.GetPropValue("BookingItems.EventId", s);
}).ToList();
where BookingItems is a list of objects.

> Get Nest properties e.g., Developer.Project.Name
private static System.Reflection.PropertyInfo GetProperty(object t, string PropertName)
{
if (t.GetType().GetProperties().Count(p => p.Name == PropertName.Split('.')[0]) == 0)
throw new ArgumentNullException(string.Format("Property {0}, is not exists in object {1}", PropertName, t.ToString()));
if (PropertName.Split('.').Length == 1)
return t.GetType().GetProperty(PropertName);
else
return GetProperty(t.GetType().GetProperty(PropertName.Split('.')[0]).GetValue(t, null), PropertName.Split('.')[1]);
}

if (info == null) { /* throw exception instead*/ }
I would actually throw an exception if they request a property that doesn't exist. The way you have it coded, if I call GetPropValue and it returns null, I don't know if that means the property didn't exist, or the property did exist but it's value was null.

public static string GetObjectPropertyValue(object obj, string propertyName)
{
bool propertyHasDot = propertyName.IndexOf(".") > -1;
string firstPartBeforeDot;
string nextParts = "";
if (!propertyHasDot)
firstPartBeforeDot = propertyName.ToLower();
else
{
firstPartBeforeDot = propertyName.Substring(0, propertyName.IndexOf(".")).ToLower();
nextParts = propertyName.Substring(propertyName.IndexOf(".") + 1);
}
foreach (var property in obj.GetType().GetProperties())
if (property.Name.ToLower() == firstPartBeforeDot)
if (!propertyHasDot)
if (property.GetValue(obj, null) != null)
return property.GetValue(obj, null).ToString();
else
return DefaultValue(property.GetValue(obj, null), propertyName).ToString();
else
return GetObjectPropertyValue(property.GetValue(obj, null), nextParts);
throw new Exception("Property '" + propertyName.ToString() + "' not found in object '" + obj.ToString() + "'");
}

I wanted to share my solution although it may be too late. This solution is primarily to check if the nested property exists. But it can be easily tweaked to return the property value if needed.
private static PropertyInfo _GetPropertyInfo(Type type, string propertyName)
{
//***
//*** Check if the property name is a complex nested type
//***
if (propertyName.Contains("."))
{
//***
//*** Get the first property name of the complex type
//***
var tempPropertyName = propertyName.Split(".", 2);
//***
//*** Check if the property exists in the type
//***
var prop = _GetPropertyInfo(type, tempPropertyName[0]);
if (prop != null)
{
//***
//*** Drill down to check if the nested property exists in the complex type
//***
return _GetPropertyInfo(prop.PropertyType, tempPropertyName[1]);
}
else
{
return null;
}
}
else
{
return type.GetProperty(propertyName, BindingFlags.IgnoreCase | BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance);
}
}
I had to refer to few posts to come up with this solution. I think this will work for multiple nested property types.

My internet connection was down when I need to solve the same problem, so I had to 're-invent the wheel':
static object GetPropertyValue(Object fromObject, string propertyName)
{
Type objectType = fromObject.GetType();
PropertyInfo propInfo = objectType.GetProperty(propertyName);
if (propInfo == null && propertyName.Contains('.'))
{
string firstProp = propertyName.Substring(0, propertyName.IndexOf('.'));
propInfo = objectType.GetProperty(firstProp);
if (propInfo == null)//property name is invalid
{
throw new ArgumentException(String.Format("Property {0} is not a valid property of {1}.", firstProp, fromObject.GetType().ToString()));
}
return GetPropertyValue(propInfo.GetValue(fromObject, null), propertyName.Substring(propertyName.IndexOf('.') + 1));
}
else
{
return propInfo.GetValue(fromObject, null);
}
}
Pretty sure this solves the problem for any string you use for property name, regardless of extent of nesting, as long as everything's a property.

Based on the original code from #jheddings, I have created a extension method version with generic type and verifications:
public static T GetPropertyValue<T>(this object sourceObject, string propertyName)
{
if (sourceObject == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(sourceObject));
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(propertyName)) throw new ArgumentException(nameof(propertyName));
foreach (string currentPropertyName in propertyName.Split('.'))
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(currentPropertyName)) throw new InvalidOperationException($"Invalid property '{propertyName}'");
PropertyInfo propertyInfo = sourceObject.GetType().GetProperty(currentPropertyName);
if (propertyInfo == null) throw new InvalidOperationException($"Property '{currentPropertyName}' not found");
sourceObject = propertyInfo.GetValue(sourceObject);
}
return sourceObject is T result ? result : default;
}

I wrote a method that received one object type as the argument from the input and returns dictionary<string,string>
public static Dictionary<string, string> GetProperties(Type placeHolderType)
{
var result = new Dictionary<string, string>();
var properties = placeHolderType.GetProperties();
foreach (var propertyInfo in properties)
{
string name = propertyInfo.Name;
string description = GetDescriptionTitle(propertyInfo);
if (IsNonString(propertyInfo.PropertyType))
{
var list = GetProperties(propertyInfo.PropertyType);
foreach (var item in list)
{
result.Add($"{propertyInfo.PropertyType.Name}_{item.Key}", item.Value);
}
}
else
{
result.Add(name, description);
}
}
return result;
}
public static bool IsNonString(Type type)
{
if (type == null || type == typeof(string))
return false;
return typeof(IPlaceHolder).IsAssignableFrom(type);
}
private static string GetDescriptionTitle(MemberInfo memberInfo)
{
if (Attribute.GetCustomAttribute(memberInfo, typeof(DescriptionAttribute)) is DescriptionAttribute descriptionAttribute)
{
return descriptionAttribute.Description;
}
return memberInfo.Name;
}

public static object GetPropertyValue(object src, string propName)
{
if (src == null) throw new ArgumentException("Value cannot be null.", "src");
if (propName == null) throw new ArgumentException("Value cannot be null.", "propName");
var prop = src.GetType().GetProperty(propName);
if (prop != null)
{
return prop.GetValue(src, null);
}
else
{
var props = src.GetType().GetProperties();
foreach (var property in props)
{
var propInfo = src.GetType().GetProperty(property.Name);
if (propInfo != null)
{
var propVal = propInfo.GetValue(src, null);
if (src.GetType().GetProperty(property.Name).PropertyType.IsClass)
{
return GetPropertyValue(propVal, propName);
}
return propVal;
}
}
return null;
}
usage: calling part
var emp = new Employee() { Person = new Person() { FirstName = "Ashwani" } };
var val = GetPropertyValue(emp, "FirstName");
above can search the property value at any level

Try inv.GetType().GetProperty("BillTo+Address");

c# update object from another object of same type ignoring null values [duplicate]

I have a need to update object A's property if null with that from object B's equivalent property if that is not null. I wanted code I can use for various objects.
I had a version working until one of the objects contained a propert of type List, which is where I have a blank in the code below. My main question is how can I best implement this part of the code. Secondly is there a better way of doing this whole thing and thirdly I know its never going to be rapid but any suggestions to speed it up would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
public T MergeWith<T, U>(T primarySource, U secondarySource) where U : class, T
{
Type primaryType = typeof(T);
Type secondaryType = typeof(U);
foreach (PropertyInfo primaryInfo in primaryType.GetProperties())
{
if (primaryInfo.CanWrite)
{
object currentPrimary = primaryInfo.GetValue(primarySource, null);
PropertyInfo secondaryInfo = secondaryType.GetProperty(primaryInfo.Name);
object currentSecondary = secondaryInfo.GetValue(secondarySource, null);
if (currentPrimary == null && currentSecondary != null)
{
primaryInfo.SetValue(primarySource, currentSecondary, null);
}
else if ((currentPrimary != null && currentSecondary != null) && isChildClass(primaryInfo))
{
if (isCollection(currentPrimary))
{
// here
}
else
{
MethodInfo method = typeof(NavigationModel).GetMethod("MergeWith");
MethodInfo generic = method.MakeGenericMethod(primaryInfo.PropertyType, primaryInfo.PropertyType);
object returnChild = generic.Invoke(this, new object[2] { currentPrimary, currentSecondary });
}
}
}
}
return primarySource;
}
private bool isCollection(object property)
{
return typeof(ICollection).IsAssignableFrom(property.GetType())
|| typeof(ICollection<>).IsAssignableFrom(property.GetType());
}
private bool isChildClass(PropertyInfo propertyInfo)
{
return (propertyInfo.PropertyType.IsClass && !propertyInfo.PropertyType.IsValueType &&
!propertyInfo.PropertyType.IsPrimitive && propertyInfo.PropertyType.FullName != "System.String");
}

I have created the below extension method for use in my latest project and it works fine, collections and all. It is a pretty much a simpler version of what you are doing in your method. With mine both classes have to be the same type. What problem do you encounter with collections?
public static class ExtensionMethods
{
public static TEntity CopyTo<TEntity>(this TEntity OriginalEntity, TEntity NewEntity)
{
PropertyInfo[] oProperties = OriginalEntity.GetType().GetProperties();
foreach (PropertyInfo CurrentProperty in oProperties.Where(p => p.CanWrite))
{
if (CurrentProperty.GetValue(NewEntity, null) != null)
{
CurrentProperty.SetValue(OriginalEntity, CurrentProperty.GetValue(NewEntity, null), null);
}
}
return OriginalEntity;
}
}

Hi I modified Ben Robinsons solution in order to not overwrite Collections or list, instead, it adds the elements of one object to the other one where the merging is happening:
public static class ExtensionMethods
{
public static TEntity CopyTo<TEntity>(this TEntity OriginalEntity, TEntity EntityToMergeOn)
{
PropertyInfo[] oProperties = OriginalEntity.GetType().GetProperties();
foreach (PropertyInfo CurrentProperty in oProperties.Where(p => p.CanWrite))
{
var originalValue = CurrentProperty.GetValue(EntityToMergeOn);
if (originalValue != null)
{
IListLogic<TEntity>(OriginalEntity, CurrentProperty, originalValue);
}
else
{
var value = CurrentProperty.GetValue(OriginalEntity, null);
CurrentProperty.SetValue(EntityToMergeOn, value, null);
}
}
return OriginalEntity;
}
private static void IListLogic<TEntity>(TEntity OriginalEntity, PropertyInfo CurrentProperty, object originalValue)
{
if (originalValue is IList)
{
var tempList = (originalValue as IList);
var existingList = CurrentProperty.GetValue(OriginalEntity) as IList;
foreach (var item in tempList)
{
existingList.Add(item);
}
}
}
}

How to determine if a type is of type HashSet and how to cast it?

I have someone on GitHub asking for the ability to compare HashSets for my project on GitHub: https://github.com/GregFinzer/Compare-Net-Objects/. I need to be able to determine if a type is a hash set and then get the enumerator. I am not sure what to cast it to. Here is what I have for an IList:
private bool IsIList(Type type)
{
return (typeof(IList).IsAssignableFrom(type));
}
private void CompareIList(object object1, object object2, string breadCrumb)
{
IList ilist1 = object1 as IList;
IList ilist2 = object2 as IList;
if (ilist1 == null) //This should never happen, null check happens one level up
throw new ArgumentNullException("object1");
if (ilist2 == null) //This should never happen, null check happens one level up
throw new ArgumentNullException("object2");
try
{
_parents.Add(object1);
_parents.Add(object2);
//Objects must be the same length
if (ilist1.Count != ilist2.Count)
{
Differences.Add(string.Format("object1{0}.Count != object2{0}.Count ({1},{2})", breadCrumb,
ilist1.Count, ilist2.Count));
if (Differences.Count >= MaxDifferences)
return;
}
IEnumerator enumerator1 = ilist1.GetEnumerator();
IEnumerator enumerator2 = ilist2.GetEnumerator();
int count = 0;
while (enumerator1.MoveNext() && enumerator2.MoveNext())
{
string currentBreadCrumb = AddBreadCrumb(breadCrumb, string.Empty, string.Empty, count);
Compare(enumerator1.Current, enumerator2.Current, currentBreadCrumb);
if (Differences.Count >= MaxDifferences)
return;
count++;
}
}
finally
{
_parents.Remove(object1);
_parents.Remove(object2);
}
}

I believe it is enough works directly with the ISet<T>, the ICollection<T> or the IEnumerable<T> generic interfaces instead of the HashSet<T>. You can detect these types using the following approach:
// ...
Type t = typeof(HashSet<int>);
bool test1 = GenericClassifier.IsICollection(t); // true
bool test2 = GenericClassifier.IsIEnumerable(t); // true
bool test3 = GenericClassifier.IsISet(t); // true
}
//
public static class GenericClassifier {
public static bool IsICollection(Type type) {
return Array.Exists(type.GetInterfaces(), IsGenericCollectionType);
}
public static bool IsIEnumerable(Type type) {
return Array.Exists(type.GetInterfaces(), IsGenericEnumerableType);
}
public static bool IsISet(Type type) {
return Array.Exists(type.GetInterfaces(), IsGenericSetType);
}
static bool IsGenericCollectionType(Type type) {
return type.IsGenericType && (typeof(ICollection<>) == type.GetGenericTypeDefinition());
}
static bool IsGenericEnumerableType(Type type) {
return type.IsGenericType && (typeof(IEnumerable<>) == type.GetGenericTypeDefinition());
}
static bool IsGenericSetType(Type type) {
return type.IsGenericType && (typeof(ISet<>) == type.GetGenericTypeDefinition());
}
}

You need to loop over GetInterfaces() and check whether it implements an interface where IsGenericType is true and GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(ISet<>)

Accepted answer does not distinguish from Dictionary type and possibly other subclasses of ICollection and IEnumerable. This works better:
Type t1 = typeof(HashSet<int>);
bool test1 = t1.IsGenericType &&
t1.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(HashSet<>); // true
Type t2 = typeof(Dictionary<int, string>);
bool test2 = t2.IsGenericType &&
t2.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(HashSet<>); // false
Type t3 = typeof(int);
bool test3 = t3.IsGenericType &&
t3.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(HashSet<>); // false

This is built in to HashSets... Use the method SymmetricExceptWith. There are other built in comparisons as well. See: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb336848.aspx

Why doesn't Dictionary<TKey, TValue> support null key? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Why can't you use null as a key for a Dictionary<bool?, string>?
(11 answers)
Need an IDictionary<TKey,TValue> implementation that will allow a null key
(8 answers)
Closed last year.
Firstly, why doesn't Dictionary<TKey, TValue> support a single null key?
Secondly, is there an existing dictionary-like collection that does?
I want to store an "empty" or "missing" or "default" System.Type, thought null would work well for this.
More specifically, I've written this class:
class Switch
{
private Dictionary<Type, Action<object>> _dict;
public Switch(params KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>[] cases)
{
_dict = new Dictionary<Type, Action<object>>(cases.Length);
foreach (var entry in cases)
_dict.Add(entry.Key, entry.Value);
}
public void Execute(object obj)
{
var type = obj.GetType();
if (_dict.ContainsKey(type))
_dict[type](obj);
}
public static void Execute(object obj, params KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>[] cases)
{
var type = obj.GetType();
foreach (var entry in cases)
{
if (entry.Key == null || type.IsAssignableFrom(entry.Key))
{
entry.Value(obj);
break;
}
}
}
public static KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>> Case<T>(Action action)
{
return new KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>(typeof(T), x => action());
}
public static KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>> Case<T>(Action<T> action)
{
return new KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>(typeof(T), x => action((T)x));
}
public static KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>> Default(Action action)
{
return new KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>(null, x => action());
}
}
For switching on types. There are two ways to use it:
Statically. Just call Switch.Execute(yourObject, Switch.Case<YourType>(x => x.Action()))
Precompiled. Create a switch, and then use it later with switchInstance.Execute(yourObject)
Works great except when you try to add a default case to the "precompiled" version (null argument exception).

Why:
As described before, the problem is that Dictionary requires an implementation of the Object.GetHashCode() method. null does not have an implementation, therefore no hash code associated.
Solution: I have used a solution similar to a NullObject pattern using generics that enables you to use the dictionary seamlessly (no need for a different dictionary implementation).
You can use it like this:
var dict = new Dictionary<NullObject<Type>, string>();
dict[typeof(int)] = "int type";
dict[typeof(string)] = "string type";
dict[null] = "null type";
Assert.AreEqual("int type", dict[typeof(int)]);
Assert.AreEqual("string type", dict[typeof(string)]);
Assert.AreEqual("null type", dict[null]);
You just need to create this struct once in a lifetime :
public struct NullObject<T>
{
[DefaultValue(true)]
private bool isnull;// default property initializers are not supported for structs
private NullObject(T item, bool isnull) : this()
{
this.isnull = isnull;
this.Item = item;
}
public NullObject(T item) : this(item, item == null)
{
}
public static NullObject<T> Null()
{
return new NullObject<T>();
}
public T Item { get; private set; }
public bool IsNull()
{
return this.isnull;
}
public static implicit operator T(NullObject<T> nullObject)
{
return nullObject.Item;
}
public static implicit operator NullObject<T>(T item)
{
return new NullObject<T>(item);
}
public override string ToString()
{
return (Item != null) ? Item.ToString() : "NULL";
}
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
if (obj == null)
return this.IsNull();
if (!(obj is NullObject<T>))
return false;
var no = (NullObject<T>)obj;
if (this.IsNull())
return no.IsNull();
if (no.IsNull())
return false;
return this.Item.Equals(no.Item);
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
if (this.isnull)
return 0;
var result = Item.GetHashCode();
if (result >= 0)
result++;
return result;
}
}

It doesn't support it because the dictionary hashes the key to determine the index, which it can't do on a null value.
A quick fix would be to create a dummy class, and insert the key value ?? dummyClassInstance.
Would need more information about what you're actually trying to do to give a less 'hacky' fix

It just hit me that your best answer is probably to just keep track of whether a default case has been defined:
class Switch
{
private Dictionary<Type, Action<object>> _dict;
private Action<object> defaultCase;
public Switch(params KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>[] cases)
{
_dict = new Dictionary<Type, Action<object>>(cases.Length);
foreach (var entry in cases)
if (entry.Key == null)
defaultCase = entry.Value;
else
_dict.Add(entry.Key, entry.Value);
}
public void Execute(object obj)
{
var type = obj.GetType();
if (_dict.ContainsKey(type))
_dict[type](obj);
else if (defaultCase != null)
defaultCase(obj);
}
...
The whole rest of your class would remain untouched.

NameValueCollection could take null key.

If you really want a dictionary that allows null keys, here's my quick implementation (not well-written or well-tested):
class NullableDict<K, V> : IDictionary<K, V>
{
Dictionary<K, V> dict = new Dictionary<K, V>();
V nullValue = default(V);
bool hasNull = false;
public NullableDict()
{
}
public void Add(K key, V value)
{
if (key == null)
if (hasNull)
throw new ArgumentException("Duplicate key");
else
{
nullValue = value;
hasNull = true;
}
else
dict.Add(key, value);
}
public bool ContainsKey(K key)
{
if (key == null)
return hasNull;
return dict.ContainsKey(key);
}
public ICollection<K> Keys
{
get
{
if (!hasNull)
return dict.Keys;
List<K> keys = dict.Keys.ToList();
keys.Add(default(K));
return new ReadOnlyCollection<K>(keys);
}
}
public bool Remove(K key)
{
if (key != null)
return dict.Remove(key);
bool oldHasNull = hasNull;
hasNull = false;
return oldHasNull;
}
public bool TryGetValue(K key, out V value)
{
if (key != null)
return dict.TryGetValue(key, out value);
value = hasNull ? nullValue : default(V);
return hasNull;
}
public ICollection<V> Values
{
get
{
if (!hasNull)
return dict.Values;
List<V> values = dict.Values.ToList();
values.Add(nullValue);
return new ReadOnlyCollection<V>(values);
}
}
public V this[K key]
{
get
{
if (key == null)
if (hasNull)
return nullValue;
else
throw new KeyNotFoundException();
else
return dict[key];
}
set
{
if (key == null)
{
nullValue = value;
hasNull = true;
}
else
dict[key] = value;
}
}
public void Add(KeyValuePair<K, V> item)
{
Add(item.Key, item.Value);
}
public void Clear()
{
hasNull = false;
dict.Clear();
}
public bool Contains(KeyValuePair<K, V> item)
{
if (item.Key != null)
return ((ICollection<KeyValuePair<K, V>>)dict).Contains(item);
if (hasNull)
return EqualityComparer<V>.Default.Equals(nullValue, item.Value);
return false;
}
public void CopyTo(KeyValuePair<K, V>[] array, int arrayIndex)
{
((ICollection<KeyValuePair<K, V>>)dict).CopyTo(array, arrayIndex);
if (hasNull)
array[arrayIndex + dict.Count] = new KeyValuePair<K, V>(default(K), nullValue);
}
public int Count
{
get { return dict.Count + (hasNull ? 1 : 0); }
}
public bool IsReadOnly
{
get { return false; }
}
public bool Remove(KeyValuePair<K, V> item)
{
V value;
if (TryGetValue(item.Key, out value) && EqualityComparer<V>.Default.Equals(item.Value, value))
return Remove(item.Key);
return false;
}
public IEnumerator<KeyValuePair<K, V>> GetEnumerator()
{
if (!hasNull)
return dict.GetEnumerator();
else
return GetEnumeratorWithNull();
}
private IEnumerator<KeyValuePair<K, V>> GetEnumeratorWithNull()
{
yield return new KeyValuePair<K, V>(default(K), nullValue);
foreach (var kv in dict)
yield return kv;
}
System.Collections.IEnumerator System.Collections.IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return GetEnumerator();
}
}

NHibernate comes with a NullableDictionary. That did it for me.
https://github.com/nhibernate/nhibernate-core/blob/master/src/NHibernate/Util/NullableDictionary.cs

Dictionary will hash the key supplie to get the index , in case of null , hash function can not return a valid value that's why it does not support null in key.

In your case you are trying to use null as a sentinel value (a "default") instead of actually needing to store null as a value. Rather than go to the hassle of creating a dictionary that can accept null keys, why not just create your own sentinel value. This is a variation on the "null object pattern":
class Switch
{
private class DefaultClass { }
....
public void Execute(object obj)
{
var type = obj.GetType();
Action<object> value;
// first look for actual type
if (_dict.TryGetValue(type, out value) ||
// look for default
_dict.TryGetValue(typeof(DefaultClass), out value))
value(obj);
}
public static void Execute(object obj, params KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>[] cases)
{
var type = obj.GetType();
foreach (var entry in cases)
{
if (entry.Key == typeof(DefaultClass) || type.IsAssignableFrom(entry.Key))
{
entry.Value(obj);
break;
}
}
}
...
public static KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>> Default(Action action)
{
return new KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>(new DefaultClass(), x => action());
}
}
Note that your first Execute function differs significantly from your second. It may be the case that you want something like this:
public void Execute(object obj)
{
Execute(obj, (IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>>)_dict);
}
public static void Execute(object obj, params KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>[] cases)
{
Execute(obj, (IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>>)cases);
}
public static void Execute(object obj, IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>> cases)
{
var type = obj.GetType();
Action<object> defaultEntry = null;
foreach (var entry in cases)
{
if (entry.Key == typeof(DefaultClass))
defaultEntry = entry.Value;
if (type.IsAssignableFrom(entry.Key))
{
entry.Value(obj);
return;
}
}
if (defaultEntry != null)
defaultEntry(obj);
}

I come across this thread some days ago and needed a well thought out and clever solution to handle null keys. I took the time and implemented one by me to handle more scenarios.
You can find my implementation of NullableKeyDictionary currently in my pre-release package Teronis.NetStandard.Collections (0.1.7-alpha.37).
Implementation
public class NullableKeyDictionary<KeyType, ValueType> : INullableKeyDictionary<KeyType, ValueType>, IReadOnlyNullableKeyDictionary<KeyType, ValueType>, IReadOnlyCollection<KeyValuePair<INullableKey<KeyType>, ValueType>> where KeyType : notnull
public interface INullableKeyDictionary<KeyType, ValueType> : IDictionary<KeyType, ValueType>, IDictionary<NullableKey<KeyType>, ValueType> where KeyType : notnull
public interface IReadOnlyNullableKeyDictionary<KeyType, ValueType> : IReadOnlyDictionary<KeyType, ValueType>, IReadOnlyDictionary<NullableKey<KeyType>, ValueType> where KeyType : notnull
Usage (Excerpt of the Xunit test)
// Assign.
var dictionary = new NullableKeyDictionary<string, string>();
IDictionary<string, string> nonNullableDictionary = dictionary;
INullableKeyDictionary<string, string> nullableDictionary = dictionary;
// Assert.
dictionary.Add("value");
/// Assert.Empty does cast to IEnumerable, but our implementation of IEnumerable
/// returns an enumerator of type <see cref="KeyValuePair{NullableKey, TValue}"/>.
/// So we test on correct enumerator implementation wether it can move or not.
Assert.False(nonNullableDictionary.GetEnumerator().MoveNext());
Assert.NotEmpty(nullableDictionary);
Assert.Throws<ArgumentException>(() => dictionary.Add("value"));
Assert.True(dictionary.Remove());
Assert.Empty(nullableDictionary);
dictionary.Add("key", "value");
Assert.True(nonNullableDictionary.GetEnumerator().MoveNext());
Assert.NotEmpty(nullableDictionary);
Assert.Throws<ArgumentException>(() => dictionary.Add("key", "value"));
dictionary.Add("value");
Assert.Equal(1, nonNullableDictionary.Count);
Assert.Equal(2, nullableDictionary.Count);
The following overloads exists for Add(..):
void Add([AllowNull] KeyType key, ValueType value)
void Add(NullableKey<KeyType> key, [AllowNull] ValueType value)
void Add([AllowNull] ValueType value); // Shortcut for adding value with null key.
This class should behave same and intuitive as the dictionary does.
For Remove(..) keys you can use the following overloads:
void Remove([AllowNull] KeyType key)
void Remove(NullableKey<KeyType> key)
void Remove(); // Shortcut for removing value with null key.
The indexers do accept [AllowNull] KeyType or NullableKey<KeyType>. So supported scenarios, like they are stated in other posts, are supported:
var dict = new NullableKeyDictionary<Type, string>
dict[typeof(int)] = "int type";
dict[typeof(string)] = "string type";
dict[null] = "null type";
// Or:
dict[NullableKey<Type>.Null] = "null type";
I highly appreciate feedback and suggestions for improvements. :)

EDIT: Real answer to the question actually being asked: Why can't you use null as a key for a Dictionary<bool?, string>?
The reason the generic dictionary doesn't support null is because TKey might be a value type, which doesn't have null.
new Dictionary<int, string>[null] = "Null"; //error!
To get one that does, you could either use the non-generic Hashtable (which uses object keys and values), or roll your own with DictionaryBase.
Edit: just to clarify why null is illegal in this case, consider this generic method:
bool IsNull<T> (T value) {
return value == null;
}
But what happens when you call IsNull<int>(null)?
Argument '1': cannot convert from '<null>' to 'int'
You get a compiler error, since you can't convert null to an int. We can fix it, by saying that we only want nullable types:
bool IsNull<T> (T value) where T : class {
return value == null;
}
And, that's A-Okay. The restriction is that we can no longer call IsNull<int>, since int is not a class (nullable object)