Develop Reference

How Create linq query select dynamic custom fileds

I want to reformat the data without going back to the database and in a dynamic way
So that the user can specify what columns he wants to collect
how I can
Write an sql string and execute it like EXECUTE IMMEDIAT in Oracle
Inside C# Linq
want to do a lock like combining two or more fields (multiply - merge...)
ToTable
It only allows me to specify the names of existing fields
FillDataSorce(params P)
{
// p It is a variable containing the field to be queried
//Like
//field1 = d["field1"] ,
//field2 = d["field2"] ,
//field sum = d["field1"] +d["field2"]
BSo.DataSource = from d in dt.AsEnumerable()
select new
{
P.Select(p => p) //col3col2 = d["col1"] + d["col2"] Dynamic field example
};
}

Linq Query on DataTable and Update Records

I have a datatable in memory and I need to select some records from it, walk through the records making changes to fields and they same the changes back to the datatable. I can do this with filters, views, and sql but I'm trying to do it in Linq.
var results = (from rows in dtTheRows.AsEnumerable()
select new
{
rows.Job,
}).Distinct();
foreach (var row in results)
{
firstRow = true;
thisOnHand = 0;
var here = from thisRow in dtTheRows.AsEnumerable()
orderby thisRow.PromisedDate
select new
{
thisRow.OnHandQuantity,
thisRow.Balance,
thisRow.RemainingQuantity
};
foreach(var theRow in here)
{
// business logic here ...
theRow.OnHandQuantity = 5;
} // foreach ...
The first linq query and foreach are gain the list of subsets of data to be considered. I include it here in case it is relevant. My problem is at this line:
heRow.OnHandQuantity = 5;
My error is:
"Error 19 Property or indexer 'AnonymousType#1.OnHandQuantity' cannot be assigned to -- it is read only"
What am I missing here? Can I update this query back into the original datatable?

var here = from thisRow in dtTheRows.AsEnumerable()
orderby thisRow.PromisedDate
select new
{
thisRow.OnHandQuantity,
thisRow.Balance,
thisRow.RemainingQuantity
};
Instead of passing three variables in select, pass thisRow itself. That may solve error on statement - theRow.OnHandQuantity = 5;

The error is self descriptive, you can't update/modify an anonymous type. You have to return the original entity you want to modify from your query.
select thisRow;
instead of
select new
{
thisRow.OnHandQuantity,
thisRow.Balance,
thisRow.RemainingQuantity
};

Linq To SQL Select Dynamic Columns

Is it possible to dynamically limit the number of columns returned from a LINQ to SQL query?
I have a database SQL View with over 50 columns. My app has a domain object with over 50 properties, one for each column. In my winforms project I bind a list of domain objects to a grid. By default only a few of the columns are visible however the user can turn on/off any of the columns.
Users are complaining the grid takes too long to load. I captured the LINQ generated SQL query then executed it within SQL Server Management Studio and verified its slow. If I alter the SQL statement, removing all the invisible columns, it runs almost instantly. There is a direct correlation between performance and the number of columns in the query.
I'm wondering if its possible to dynamically alter the number of columns returned from the LINQ generated SQL query? For example, here is what my code currently looks like:
public List<Entity> GetEntities()
{
using (var context = new CensusEntities())
{
return (from e in context.Entities
select e).ToList();
}
}
The context.Entities object was generated from a SQL View that contains over 50 columns so when the above executes it generates SQL like "SELECT Col1, Col2, Col3, ... Col50 FROM Entity INNER JOIN...". I would like to change the method signature to look like this:
public List<Entity> GetEntities(string[] visibleColumns)
{
using (var context = new CensusEntities())
{
return (from e in context.Entities
select e).ToList();
}
}
I'm not sure how to alter the body of this method to change the generated SQL statement to only return the column values I care about, all others can be NULL.

Something like this should work:
List<string> columns = new List<string>();
columns.Add("EmployeeID");
columns.Add("HireDate");
columns.Add("City");
Add columns to your list ^.
var result = Class.ReturnList(columns);
Pass the List to a method ^.
public static List<Entity> ReturnList(List<string> VisibleColumns)
{
StringBuilder SqlStatement = new StringBuilder();
SqlStatement.Append("Select ");
for (int i = 0; i < VisibleColumns.Count; i++)
{
if (i == VisibleColumns.Count - 1)
{
SqlStatement.Append(VisibleColumns[i]);
}
else
{
SqlStatement.Append(VisibleColumns[i]);
SqlStatement.Append(",");
}
}
SqlStatement.Append(" FROM Entity");
using (var ctx = new DataClasses1DataContext())
{
var result = ctx.ExecuteQuery<Entity>(SqlStatement.ToString());
return result.ToList();
}
}
This basically just makes a SELECT statement with all the fields you passed in with the VisibleColumns list.
In this case, the SQL statement that will be generated by the strings in the VisibleColumns list is:
Select EmployeeID, HireDate, City From Employee
(note: i used the Northwind database to try this out, hence the EmployeeID etc column names. You should replace them with your own, obviously.)

It is not trivial to do this dynamically, but if you have a limited set of combinations of columns you want to retreive you can do an explicit select like this:
public List<Entity> GetEntities()
{
using (var context = new CensusEntities())
{
return (from e in context.Entities
select new
{
col1 = e.col1,
col4 = e.col4,
col5 = e.col5,
}
).ToList()
.Select(x=>new Entity{col1 = x.col1, col4 = x.col4, col5 = x.col5}).ToList();
}
}
The extra select step is necessary because LINQ2SQL won't create partial entities for you.
Create a method for each common combination of columns (especially the initial) the users wants to retrieve.
However to make this dynamic you can build a query with you entity stored as a property in an anonymous class and collect your result properties in another anonymous class in second property in the same anonymous class. Finally you select your entities from the collected objects into objects of the correct type.
public List<Entity> GetEntities()
{
using (var context = new CensusEntities())
{
var combinedResult = (from e in context.Entities
select new {
Entity = e,
CollectedValues = new
{
// Insert default values of the correct type as placeholders
col1 = 0, // or "" for string or false for bool
col2 = 0, // or "" for string or false for bool
// ...
col49 = 0, // or "" for string or false for bool
col50 = 0, // or "" for string or false for bool
}
);
// Then copy each requested property
// col1
if (useCol1)
{
var combinedResult = (from e in combinedResult
select new {
Entity = e,
CollectedValues = new
{
col1 = e.Enitity.col1, // <-- here we update with the real value
col2 = e.CollectedValues.col2, // <-- here we just use any previous value
// ...
col49 = e.CollectedValues.col49, // <-- here we just use any previous value
col50 = e.CollectedValues.col50, // <-- here we just use any previous value }
);
}
// col2
if (useCol2)
{
// same as last time
col1 = e.CollectedValues.col1, // <-- here we just use any previous value
col2 = e.Enitity.col2, // <-- here we update with the real value
// ...
}
// repeat for all columns, update the column you want to fetch
// Just get the collected objects, discard the temporary
// Entity property. When the query is executed here only
// The properties we actually have used from the Entity object
// will be fetched from the database and mapped.
return combinedResult.Select(x => x.CollectedValues).ToList()
.Select(x=>new Entity{col1 = x.col1, col2 = x.col2, ... col50 = x.col50}).ToList();
}
}
There will be lots of code, and a pain to maintain, but it should work.
If you are going this route I suggest that you build a code generator that builds this code with reflection from your LINQ context.

Try something like this
using (var context = new CensusEntities())
{
var q = from e in context.Entities
select e.myfield1,e.myfield2;
return q.Tolist();
}
The resulting query should be lighter and also all the data conversion that goes underneath.
But if you really need to build dynamic input, I think some dynamic sql should be involved. So
build the dynamic SQL and get a data table
use a datatable to a dynamic object conversion as shown here
How can I convert a DataTable into a Dynamic object?
BTW a lot of hard work, I think you should considered using the first block of code.

Is there a way to access the columns in a Dapper FastExpando via string or index?

I am pulling in a Dapper FastExpando object and want to be able to reference the column names dynamically at run time rather than at design/compile time. So I want to be able to do the following:
var testdata = conn.Query("select * from Ride Where RiderNum = 21457");
I want to be able to do the following:
foreach( var row in testdata) {
var Value = row["PropertyA"];
}
I understand that I can do:
var Value = row.PropertyA;
but I can't do that since the name of the property i'm going to need won't be known until runtime.
The answer from this SO Question doesn't work. I still get the same Target Invocation exception. So...
Is there any way to do what I want to do with a Dapper FastExpando?

Sure, it is actually way easier than that:
var sql = "select 1 A, 'two' B";
var row = (IDictionary<string, object>)connection.Query(sql).First();
row["A"].IsEqualTo(1);
row["B"].IsEqualTo("two");

Regarding the portion of the title "or index?" - I needed to access results by index since the column names being returned changed sometimes, so you can use a variation of Sam Saffron's answer like this:
var sql = "select 1, 'two'";
var row = (IDictionary<string, object>)connection.Query(sql).First();
row.Values.ElementAt(0).IsEqualTo(1);
row.Values.ElementAt(1).IsEqualTo("two");

There a simple way to access fields direct below sample
string strConexao = WebConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["connection"].ConnectionString;
conexaoBD = new SqlConnection(strConexao);
conexaoBD.Open();
var result = conexaoBD.Query("Select Field1,Field2 from Table").First();
//access field value result.Field1
//access field value result.Field2
if (result.Field1 == "abc"){ dosomething}

How to get text from LINQ2SQL query?

I have a web page in which I am giving USER the options of writing notes. Now when ever the web page checks that a USER is:abc then it pulls up the note from the MEMO Table.
Here is my code in Page_Load():
using (EntityMemoDataContext em = new EntityMemoDataContext())
{
int getEntity = Int16.Parse(Session["EntityIdSelected"].ToString());
var showMemo = from r in em.EntityMemoVs_1s
where r.EntityID == getEntity
select r.Memo;
tbShowNote.Text = String.Join(#"<br />", showMemo);
}
tbShowNote is showing me value like this:
test<br />test1<br />test1<br />test4<br />test4
And I want it like this:
Test
Test1
Test2 ...
tbShowNote is a TextBox!

You only asked for the first memo, so that's what you got back. If you want it enumerated with each one on it's own line in html, you could do this:
using (EntityMemoDataContext em = new EntityMemoDataContext())
{
int getEntity1 = Int16.Parse(Session["EntityIdSelected"].ToString());
var showMemo = from r in em.EntityMemoVs_1s
where r.EntityID == getEntity1
select new
{
r.Memo
};
tbShowNote.Text = String.Join(#"<br />", showMemo);
}
The key takeaway is if r.Memo is of type string, then the LINQ query you executed gave you back a IQueryable<string>. It's on you to decide if you want to flatten that list later.
Edit: Equiso made a good observation in that you're actually returning an IQueryable of an anonymous type, not IQueryable<string> due to the new { ... } syntax. I'd say combine his answer with mine and run with it:
var showMemo = from r in em.EntityMemoVs_1s
where r.EntityID == getEntity1
select r.Memo;
tbShowNote.Text = String.Join(#"<br />", showMemo);

The problem is in the select part of your linq query, you are wrapping your results in an anonymous type, that is why when you call ToString() you see { Memo = test }. You probably want it like this:
var showMemo = from r in em.EntityMemoVs_1s
where r.EntityID == getEntity1
select r.Memo;
After that showMemo will contain just strings.

It looks like your showMemo is a collection and you are then just assigning the top value? If you are putting them in one string then you need to aggregate them together.