We are currently working on an API for an existing system.
It basically wraps some web-requests as an easy-to-use library that 3rd party companies should be able to use with our product.
As part of the API, there is an event mechanism where the server can call back to the client via a constantly-running socket connection.
To minimize load on the server, we want to only have one connection per computer. Currently there is a socket open per process, and that could eventually cause load problems if you had multiple applications using the API.
So my question is: if we want to deploy our API as a single standalone assembly, what is the best way to fix our problem?
A couple options we thought of:
Write an out of process COM object (don't know if that works in .Net)
Include a second exe file that would be required for events, it would have to single-instance itself, and open a named pipe or something to communicate through multiple processes
Extract this exe file from an embedded resource and execute it
None of those really seem ideal.
Any better ideas?
Do you mean something like Net.TCP port sharing?
You could fix the client-side port while opening your socket, say 45534. Since one port can be opened by only one process, only one process at a time would be able to open socket connection to the server.
Well, there are many ways to solve this as expressed in all the answers and comments, but may be the simpler way you can use is just have global status store in a place accesible for all the users of the current machine (may be you might have various users logged-in on the machine) where you store WHO has the right to have this open. Something like a "lock" as is used to be called. That store can be a field in a local or intranet database, a simple file, or whatever. That way you don't need to build or distribute extra binaries.
When a client connects to your server you create a new thread to handle him (not a process). You can store his IP address in a static dictionary (shared between all threads).
Something like:
static Dictionary<string, TcpClient> clients = new Dictionary<string, TcpClient>();
//This method is executed in a thread
void ProcessRequest(TcpClient client)
{
string ip = null;
//TODO: get client IP address
lock (clients)
{
...
if (clients.ContainsKey(ip))
{
//TODO: Deny connection
return;
}
else
{
clients.Add(ip, client);
}
}
//TODO: Answer the client
}
//TODO: Delete client from list on disconnection
The best solution we've come up with is to create a windows service that opens up a named pipe to manage multiple client processes through one socket connection to the server.
Then our API will be able to detect if the service is running/installed and fall back to creating it's own connection for the client otherwise.
3rd parties can decide if they want to bundle the service with their product or not, but core applications from our system will have it installed.
I will mark this as the answer in a few days if no one has a better option. I was hoping there was a way to execute our assembly as a new process, but all roads to do this do not seem very reliable.
Related
Using WCF, .NET 4.5, Visual Studio 2015, and want to use per-session instancing, not singleton. The services provided are to be full-duplex, over tcp.net.
Suppose I have two machines, A & B...
B as a client, connects to a "service" provided as a WCF service on same machine B, and starts talking to it, call it object “X”. It ALSO connects to another instance of the same service, call it object “Y”
A as a client, wants to connect to, and use, exact same objects B is talking to, objects “X” and “Y”, except now it’s remote-remote, not local-remote.
“X” and “Y” are actually a video servers, and both have “state”.
Can I do this? How, when I’m a client, do I specify WHICH service instance I want to connect to?
Obviously, on machine "B", I could kludge this by having the services just be front-ends with no "state", which communicate with some processes running on "B", but that would require I write a bunch of interprocess code, which I hate.
Machine B is expected to be running 100's of these "video server" instances, each one being talked to by a local master (singleton) service, AND being talked to by end-user machines.
I realize this question is a bit generic, but it also addresses a question I could not find asked, or answered, on the Internets.
I just thought of one possible, but kludge-y solution: since the master service is a singleton, when service instance "X" is created by the end-user, it could connect to the singleton master service, through a proxy to the singleton. Then, the singleton can talk back to instance "X" over a callback channel. Yeah, that would work! messy, but possible.
I'd still like to know if end user A and end user B can both talk to the same (non-singleton) service instance on machine C through some funky channel manipulation or something. As I understand the rules of WCF, this simply isn't possible. Perhaps maybe if you're hosting the service yourself, instead of IIS, but even then, I don't think it's possible?
I've faced the same problem and solved it by creating two service references, one for the local one for the remote. Let's call it LocalServiceClient and RemoteServiceClient.
In a class, create a property called Client (or whatever you like to call it):
public LocalServiceClient Client {
get {
return new LocalServiceClient();
}
}
Okay this is for only one of them. Just create another now, and set which one to use with a compiler flag:
#if DEBUG
public LocalServiceClient Client {
get {
return new LocalServiceClient();
}
}
#else
public RemoteServiceClient Client {
get {
return new RemoteServiceClient();
}
}
#endif
Instantiate any instances of your Client using var keyword, so it will be implicitly-typed, or just use Client directly:
var client = Client;
client.DoSomething...
//or
Client.DoSomething...
This way, when you are working locally, it will connect to the local service, and on release configuration (make sure you are on Release when publishing) it will compile for the remote one. Make sure you have the exact same signature/code for both services though at the WCF-side.
There are also methods that you can dynamically do it in code, or like in web.config, they would also work for sure, but they are usually an overkill. You probably need to connect to local one in debugging, and the remote one in production, and this is going to give you exactly what you need.
I have an issue. I'd have a video player that takes in simple parameters as a c# form app. As an experiment to better understand programming, I'd like to have only one instance of the app running and have it refresh with the new args if the open command is given. I could program it so that when it gets the signal, to refreshVideo() or something like that.
Pseudo example:
//app is started from cmd line
//open app for first time
vidViewer.exe("lotr.avi", "44:44");
//keep instance open but have it refresh with new movie
vidViewer.exe("star_wars.avi", "22:32")
As it stands right now a new app with embedded video player will open, so I could have 100 open flicks if I passed it enough args. I'd just like to keep it at one.
Can provide more info if needed.
Thanks all,
Kevin
My suggestion would be to design your application such that, when launched, it would attempt to acquire a system resource that is mutually exclusive (meaning that only the first instance would succeed). Since, in your scenario, you will also require a means of interprocess communication (to transmit the name and start-time of new videos), you may use the same mechanism for achieving this.
You could, for example, use a self-hosted WCF service, bound to a fixed TCP port, that each application instance attempts to register upon being started. Due to the way ports work, only the first instance will succeed; subsequent instances would fail with a “port already in use” exception.
If an instance manages to register the WCF service, then you may assume it to be the “principal” instance and proceed to play the video on it. It should, however, listen for incoming messages from the WCF service and update the video being played accordingly (see below).
If an instance finds that the port is already in use, it should assume that another instance is already running. It would then initialize a WCF client that sends the name and start-time of the new video to be played to the WCF service. Finally, it should terminate itself without displaying any window, assuming that the principal instance will take care of playing its video.
I have an application that runs as a Windows service. It stores various things settings in a database that are looked up when the service starts. I built the service to support various types of databases (SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL, etc). Often times end users choose to configure the software to use SQL Server (they can simply modify a config file with the connection string and restart the service). The problem is that when their machine boots up, often times SQL Server is started after my service so my service errors out on start up because it can't connect to the database. I know that I can specify dependencies for my service to help guide the Windows service manager to start the appropriate services before mine. However, I don't know what services to depend upon at install time (when my service is registered) since the user can change databases later on.
So my question is: is there a way for the user to manually indicate the service dependencies based on the database that they are using? If not, what is the proper design approach that I should be taking? I've thought about trying to do something like wait 30 seconds after my service starts up before connecting to the database but this seems really flaky for various reasons. I've also considered trying to "lazily" connect to the database; the problem is that I need a connection immediately upon start up since the database contains various pieces of vital info that my service needs when it first starts. Any ideas?
Dennis
what your looking for is SC.exe. This is a command line tool that users can use to configure services.
sc [Servername] Command Servicename [Optionname= Optionvalue...]
more specificly you would want to use
sc [ServerName] config ServiceName depend=servicetoDependOn
Here is a link on the commandlike options for SC.EXE
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms810435.aspx
A possible (far from ideal) code solution:
In you startup method code it as a loop that terminates when you've got a connection. Then in that loop trap any database connection errors and keep retrying as the following pseudo code illustrates:
bool connected = false;
while (!connected)
{
try
{
connected = openDatabase(...);
}
catch (connection error)
{
// It might be worth waiting for some time here
}
}
This means that your program doesn't continue until it has a connection. However, it could also mean that your program never gets out of this loop, so you'd need some way of terminating it - either manually or after a certain number of tries.
As you need your service to start in a reasonable time, this code can't go in the main initialisation. You have to arrange for your program to "start" successfully, but not do any processing until this method had returned connected = true. You might achieve this by putting this code in a thread and then starting your actual application code on the "thread completed" event.
Not a direct answer put some points you can look into
Windows service can be started Automatically with a delay. You can check this question in SO for some information about it.
How to make Windows Service start as “Automatic (Delayed Start)”
Check this post How to: Code Service Dependencies
is there any way to check internet connection status in linux using mono
If it's desktop app, you could query NetworkManager (which is the network connection manager on most Linux desktops) over d-bus, using the NDesk.DBus library.
See Banshee for an example: http://git.gnome.org/cgit/banshee/tree/src/Core/Banshee.Services/Banshee.Networking/NetworkManager.cs
Apart from what Michael already suggested for a desktop application, you can also do something like:
foreach (NetworkInterface ni in NetworkInformation.GetAllNetworkInterfaces ()) {
// Check that any or all of:
// -ni.OperationalStatus == OperationalStatus.Up
// -that ni.NetworkInterfaceType is ethernet or wireless80211
// -ni.GetIPProperties() has a gateway and a DNS server
// ...
}
No matter what you end up using, it won't be reliable.
I see it all the time with Windows Vista and 7 at home. I use a home network, so my computers are always "connected." However, they are not always connected to the Internet.
That said, I would recommend checking the network interfaces as Gonzalo said. It is your best bet.
I would not rely on NetworkManager being present. I hate that thing and turn it off whenever I can. It is huge, ungainly, has an ugly name, relies on junk like HAL and DBUS. Early versions permanently put me off because they didn't work unless you were logged in to a GUI. It also collected bug work-arounds for wifi that were completely ridiculous in an open-source operating system that should have just fixed the original bugs. That led to other wifi managers and the command-line not being able to work properly and people being told to use NetworkManager, only because no one ever bothered to fix the actual bug!
You could try to open your connection as it is needed. If that fails display an error message.
Alternatively, if you really need a general check (e.g. at application start) you could try to make HTTP requests to one or more omnipresent websites like google.com. (Or what ever protocol you mean by "internet").
Check out HttpWebRequest.
I've been really interested in adding support for video podcasts to Media Browser.
I would like users to be able to navigate through the available video podcasts and stream them from the internets. That's really easy cause media player etc.. will happily play a file that lives in the cloud.
The problem is that I want cache these files locally so subsequent viewings of the same episode will not involve streaming and instead will play the local file.
So... I was thinking, why not host an HttpListener and as media player asks it for bits of the file, have the HttpListener download and store it locally. Next time a user plays the file we will already have portions of the file locally.
Does anyone know of example code that uses HttpListener for proxying?
EDIT
The idea would be only to proxy simple streamable content like MP3 or Mov.
The bounty will go to an actual implementation.
Here is the API I would like:
// will proxy a uri on the local port, if cacheFile exists it will resume the
// download from cacheFile.
// while the file is downloading it will be name cacheFile.partial, after the
// download is complete the file will be renamed to cacheFile.
// Example usage: ProxyFile("http://media.railscasts.com/videos/176_searchlogic.mov", 8000, #"c:\downloads\railscasts\176_searchlogic.mov")
//
// Directly after this call http://localhost:8000 will be the proxy stream, it will be playable locally.
void ProxyUri(Uri uri, int port, string cacheFile)
Edit 2
HttpListener is looking pretty unpromising I will probably need to do the work at a TCP socket level as HttpListeners seem to require the program runs as admin which is going to be really tricky.
I hadn't done anything with HttpListener before, so I thought this would be a nice little exercise to bring myself up to speed with it - and so it proved. I implemented it as a single ProxyListener class whose constructor takes the parameters of the ProxyUri function you specified. Once you obtain an instance, you start it listening (and potentially downloading) by calling its Start method. When you're done with it, call Cleanup.
There are one or two rough edges but basically it works as per your question. To test it, I built it up as a console application with a Program class which accepts input lines consisting of (uri, port, filename), space-separated, creates the ProxyListener instances and starts them. You can run this console application, type in a suitable line, and the downloader will start (printing out progress to console). Simultaneously you can e.g. fire up IE and fetch the file from the specified port, and you will be able to download it while the downloader is still working. The "uploader" progress will be printed to console, too.
I'm having a bit of trouble pasting it in here, maybe due to size (it's not that big, but bigger than the snippets you normally see here - the ProxyListener class is a tad under 200 lines). Does it sound interesting? If so, I'll post it to a pastebin and update this answer with a link.
Update: Posted as a gist.
Note that you will need Administrator privileges to run the program, since HttpListener requires this.
Update 2: Under certain circumstances, it is not necessary to have admin privileges to run HttpListener. See this link and this one. The idea is, if you can reserve an URL namespace during installation time, then the user does not have to have admin privileges if listening against that namespace.
Streaming was not designed to be saved, and also these protocols are very custom and very complex to implement, streaming sessions do lots of validation and synchronization which will be extremely difficult to imitate. Of course it is not an impossible task, but its fairly big task to do. Only other way is to read and save it as local media file, and use that as a reference. Because you can use windows media encoder to read stream and write stream data as local file, but it still may not allow you to do copy protected data.
Did you consider using HTTP proxy with caching features?
Like:
Apache httpd with mod_proxy and mod_cache
Squid
See also Web Cache # wikipedia
If you want your application to have such web cache component, I suggest you look for Web Cache implementation in .Net, and not code it from scratch.