Trying to create an uebersimple class that implements get enumerator, but failing madly due to lack of simple / non-functioning examples out there. All I want to do is create a wrapper around a data structure (in this case a list, but I might need a dictionary later) and add some functions.
public class Album
{
public readonly string Artist;
public readonly string Title;
public Album(string artist, string title)
{
Artist = artist;
Title = title;
}
}
public class AlbumList
{
private List<Album> Albums = new List<Album>;
public Count { get { return Albums.Count; } }
.....
//Somehow GetEnumerator here to return Album
}
Thanks!
You can simply return the enumerator returned by List<T>.GetEnumerator:
public class AlbumList : IEnumerable<Album>
{
// ...
public IEnumerator<Album> GetEnumerator()
{
return this.albums.GetEnumerator();
}
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return GetEnumerator();
}
}
In addition to the other answers if you need a little more control over how the enumerator works or if there is a requirement to customize it beyond what the underlying data structure can provide then you can use the yield keyword.
public class AlbumList : IEnumerable<Album>
{
public IEnumerator<Album> GetEnumerator()
{
foreach (Album item in internalStorage)
{
// You could use conditional checks or other statements here for a higher
// degree of control regarding what the enumerator returns.
yield return item;
}
}
}
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
public class AlbumList : IEnumerable<Album>
{
private List<Album> Albums = new List<Album>();
public int Count => Albums.Count;
public IEnumerator<Album> GetEnumerator()
{
return this.Albums.GetEnumerator();
}
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return this.GetEnumerator();
}
}
or the simplified version:
public class AlbumList
{
private List<Album> Albums = new List<Album>();
public int Count => Albums.Count;
public IEnumerator<Album> GetEnumerator()
{
return this.Albums.GetEnumerator();
}
}
I wouldn't advice leaving out the IEnumerable<T> interface, because you loose integration with .NET such as possibilities to use LINQ, but you can iterate over the collection using a foreach in C#.
Or this one is even shorter :-)
public class AlbumList : List<Album>
{
}
Of course this last one is a mutable list, which perhaps is not exactly what you want.
Based on your comment that you want to have a wrapper around a data structure (the list), and an enumerator function to return an Album, I think you're talking about indexer properties, right? This is how you do it:
public class Album
{
public readonly string Artist;
public readonly string Title;
public Album(string artist, string title)
{
Artist = artist;
Title = title;
}
}
public class AlbumList
{
private List<Album> Albums = new List<Album>();
public int Count
{
get { return Albums.Count; }
}
public Album this[int index]
{
get
{
return Albums[index];
}
}
public Album this[string albumName]
{
get
{
return Albums.FirstOrDefault(c => c.Title == albumName);
}
}
public void Add(Album album)
{
Albums.Add(album);
}
public void Remove(Album album)
{
Albums.Remove(album);
}
}
A small console program:
AlbumList albums = new AlbumList();
albums.Add(new Album { Artist = "artist1", Title = "title1" });
albums.Add(new Album { Artist = "artist2", Title = "title2" });
for (int i = 0; i < albums.Count; i++)
{
Console.WriteLine(albums[i].Artist);
Console.WriteLine(albums[i].Title);
}
Console.WriteLine("title for artist1");
Console.WriteLine(albums["artist1"].Title);
Related
Hi I have created few nested iEnumerable implemented classes.
CDSWorkflowCollection
CDSModuleCollection
CDSSystemCollection
Below are my Classes
public class cdssystems
{
public string cdsSystemName;
public CDSModuleCollection listModules;
}
public class cdsmodules
{
public string moduleName;
public CDSWorkflowCollection listWorkflows;
}
class cdsdelgate
{
private string delgateName;
private DateTime fromDate;
private DateTime toDate;
private string functionElement;
private CDSSystemCollection cdsSystemsList;
private string cdsComments;
private string JobTitle;
}
public class cdsworkflows
{
public string WorkflowName;
public string ActionGroup;
}
class CDSWorkflowCollection : ICollection, IEnumerable<cdsworkflows>
{
private List<cdsworkflows> cdsWorkflowList;
private readonly object syncObject = new object();
public CDSWorkflowCollection(IEnumerable<cdsworkflows> cdsWorkflowList)
: base()
{
this.cdsWorkflowList = new List<cdsworkflows>(cdsWorkflowList);
}
public IEnumerator<cdsworkflows> GetEnumerator()
{
return this.cdsWorkflowList.GetEnumerator();
}
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return this.cdsWorkflowList.GetEnumerator();
}
public void CopyTo(Array array, int index)
{
if ((array.Rank != 1) || ((this.Count + index) > array.Length))
{
throw new ArgumentException();
}
int count = 0;
foreach (cdsworkflows cssWorkflow in this.cdsWorkflowList)
{
array.SetValue(cssWorkflow, count++);
}
}
public int Count
{
get
{
return this.cdsWorkflowList.Count;
}
}
public bool IsSynchronized
{
get
{
return false;
}
}
public object SyncRoot
{
get
{
return this.syncObject;
}
}
}
class CDSSystemCollection : ICollection, IEnumerable<cdssystems>
{
private List<cdssystems> cdsSystemList;
private readonly object syncObject = new object();
public CDSSystemCollection(IEnumerable<cdssystems> cdsSystemList)
: base()
{
this.cdsSystemList = new List<cdssystems>(cdsSystemList);
}
//Rest of the code here
}
class CDSDelegateCollection : ICollection, IEnumerable<cdsdelgate>
{
private List<cdsdelgate> cdsDelegateist;
private readonly object syncObject = new object();
public CDSDelegateCollection(IEnumerable<cdsdelgate> cdsDelegateList)
: base()
{
this.cdsDelegateist = new List<cdsdelgate>(cdsDelegateList);
}
//Rest of the code here
}
No i want to add objects to the class using group by and my code goes like below
var results = (from SPListItem item in myItemsList
group item by item["Systems"]
into grp
select new cdssystems()
{
cdsSystemName = grp.Key.ToString(),
listModules = (from item in grp
group item by item["Modules"]
into grpModules
select new cdsmodules()
{
moduleName = grpModules.Key.ToString(),
listWorkflows = (from item in grpModules
group item by item["Workflows"]
into grpWorkflows
select new cdsworkflows()
{
WorkflowName = grpWorkflows.Key.ToString(),
ActionGroup = grpWorkflows.FirstOrDefault()["ActionGroup"].ToString()
}
).ToList()
}).ToList()
}).ToList();
I am getting Error in ToList() saying
Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Collections.Generic.List' to 'CDS.BusinessObjects.CDSWorkflowCollection'
I know the parm expects a collection and i am passing List. How to pass the collection. Please help
Delete your custom collection types and use the Generic ones from the .net framework instead. You can use List<T>, IList<T>, or ICollection<T>. There is almost never a need to write your own collection implementation(s).
public class cdsmodules
{
public string moduleName;
public CDSWorkflowCollection listWorkflows;
}
becomes
public class cdsmodules
{
public string moduleName { get; set; }
public List<cdsworkflows> listWorkflows { get; set; }
}
You should also follow proper visibility guidelines by never exposing fields directly. Instead use a property with a get;set; accessor. Fields should almost always be scoped as private or protected.
I've implemented the composite pattern as follows
public interface IComponent
{
string Name { get; }
}
public interface IComposite : IComponent
{
void AddRange(IEnumerable<IComponent> components);
}
public interface ILeaf : IComponent
{
string Content { get; }
string Parent { get; }
}
public class Composite : IComposite
{
// return an iterator?
private readonly List<IComponent> _children = new List<IComponent>();
public Composite(string name)
{
Name = name;
}
public string Name { get; }
public void AddRange(IEnumerable<IComponent> components)
{
_children.AddRange(components);
}
}
public class Leaf : ILeaf
{
public string Name { get; }
public string Content { get; }
public string Parent { get; }
public Leaf(string name, string content, string parent)
{
Name = name;
Content = content;
Parent = parent;
}
}
I've populated the composite from an xml file as follows
var collection = XElement.Load(#"C:\somexml.xml");
var composite = CreateComposite(collection);
where
public IComponent CreateComposite(XElement element)
{
if (!element.HasElements)
return new Leaf(element.Name.LocalName, element.Value, element.Parent.Name.LocalName);
var composite = new Composite(element.Name.LocalName);
composite.AddRange(element.Elements().Select(CreateComposite));
return composite;
}
This populates my composite as expected - great! However, I'd now like my composite to return an iterator via the implementation of IEnumerable. So I tried this
public class Composite : IComposite, IEnumerable<IComponent>
{
// return an iterator?
private readonly List<IComponent> _children = new List<IComponent>();
public Composite(string name)
{
Name = name;
}
public string Name { get; }
public void AddRange(IEnumerable<IComponent> components)
{
_children.AddRange(components);
}
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return GetEnumerator();
}
public IEnumerator<IComponent> GetEnumerator()
{
foreach (var child in _children)
{
yield return child;
}
}
}
But this only iterates through the top level of components, i.e., any components nested within _children are not returned. How do I update this to recursively iterate through all components?
You can iterate recursively like this (it will do iteration in depth-first manner):
public interface IComposite : IComponent, IEnumerable<IComponent>
{
void AddRange(IEnumerable<IComponent> components);
}
public IEnumerator<IComponent> GetEnumerator()
{
foreach (var child in _children)
{
yield return child;
var composite = child as IComposite;
if (composite != null) {
foreach (var sub in composite) {
yield return sub;
}
}
}
}
If you want to avoid the cast to IComposite - you need to redesign your interfaces and make your Composite to hold a list of another IComposites instead of components. Then ILeft will also become IComposite with dummy implementation.
You could implement the traversal recursively using Linq as follows.
public IEnumerable<IComponent> GetSuccessors()
{
return _children
.Concat(_children.SelectMany(iChild => iChild.GetSuccessors());
}
If depht-first traversal is desired, you can use the following implementation.
public IEnumerable<IComponent> GetSuccessors()
{
return _children
.SelectMany(iChild => new IComponent[]{iChild}.Concat(iChild.GetSuccessors()));
}
Or, if you need it using your initial syntax, you could use the following.
public IEnumerator<IComponent> GetEnumerator()
{
var Successors
= _children
.SelectMany(iChild => new IComponent[]{iChild}.Concat(iChild.GetSuccessors()));
foreach (var iSuccessor in Successors)
{
yield return iSuccessor;
}
}
This question already has answers here:
IEnumerable , IEnumerator vs foreach, when to use what [duplicate]
(3 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
I have a simple class, Employee, and another class, Company, which contains an array of employees. The company class has 2 nested classes with iterators. One orders the items from first to last, and the second one reverses the order. The NormalEnumeration is the default. When I attempt to use ReverseOrder" in a foreach loop, I get this error:
foreach statement cannot operate on variables of type
'Zadanie_1.Company.ReverseEnumeration' because
'Zadanie_1.Company.ReverseEnumeration' does not contain a public
definition for 'GetEnumerator'
My questions is: How can I implement the custom iterators?
public class Employee
{
private string surname, position;
public string Stanowisko { get { return position; } }
public Employee (string nazwisko, string stanowisko)
{
this.surname = nazwisko;
this.position = stanowisko;
}
public override string ToString()
{
return string.Format("nazwisko: {0}, stanowisko: {1}", surname, position);
}
}
public class Company:IEnumerable
{
string name;
private Employee[] employeeArray;
public Company(string nazwa, Employee[] pracownicy)
{
this.name = nazwa;
this.employeeArray = pracownicy;
}
public IEnumerator GetEnumerator()
{
//foreach (Pracownik item in pracownicy)
//{
// yield return item;
//}
return new NormalEnumeration(this);
}
public IEnumerator Ordered()
{
return new NormalEnumeration(this);
}
public override string ToString()
{
return string.Format("Nazwa firmy: {0}, liczba pracowników: {1}", name, employeeArray.Length);
}
public class ReverseEnumeration : IEnumerator
{
Company f;
int counter;
public ReverseEnumeration(Company f)
{
this.f = f;
counter = f.employeeArray.Length;
}
public object Current
{
get
{
Console.WriteLine("Current");
return f.employeeArray[counter];
}
}
public bool MoveNext()
{
if (counter > 0)
{
Console.WriteLine("Move next:");
counter--;
return true;
}
else
return false;
}
public void Reset()
{
counter = f.employeeArray.Length;
}
}
public class NormalEnumeration : IEnumerator
{
Company f;
int counter = -1;
public NormalEnumeration(Company f)
{
this.f = f;
}
public object Current
{
get
{
Console.WriteLine("Current");
return f.employeeArray[counter];
}
}
public bool MoveNext()
{
if (counter >= f.employeeArray.Length-1)
return false;
else
{
counter++;
return true;
}
}
public void Reset()
{
counter = -1;
}
}
}
Comment under the question:
I tried to call the reverse iterator this way:
foreach (Employee item in new Company.ReverseEnumeration(instancenamehere)) {
Console.WriteLine(item);
}
For this to work, ReverseEnumration would have to implement IEnumerable. If you want to be able to modify the enumerator, just add a new property to the Company class.
public class Company : IEnumerable
{
public IEnumerator Enumerator { get; set; }
public IEnumerator GetEnumerator()
{
return Enumerator;
}
// other members
}
You can set the default enumerator in the constructor.
public Company(string nazwa, Employee[] pracownicy)
{
Enumerator = new NormalEnumeration(this);
// other stuff
}
You should extract your enumerators out of the Company class, because they don't use it's internals anyway. This will enable you to easily change enumerators from the outside.
var c = new Company(null, null);
c.Enumerator = new ReverseEnumeration(c);
I have two classes named Person and Staff. Person class just keeps fields and properties. Staff class implements IEnumarable interface. What I want to do is to make this class enumarable. I will create an instance Staff class on form_Load and then iterate over it. But I think something is wrong here.
public Person this[int index]
{
get { return Staff[index]; }
set { Staff[index] = value; }
}
This is what I have so far. How can I fix this
public class Person
{
private int _age;
private string _name;
public int Age
{
get { return _age; }
set { _age = value; }
}
public string Name
{
get { return _name; }
set { _name = value; }
}
public Person(int age, string name)
{
_age = age;
_name = name;
}
}
public class Staff : IEnumerable
{
private List<Person> list;
public Person this[int index]
{
get { return Staff[index]; }
set { Staff[index] = value; }
}
public Staff(Person person)
{
list = new List<Person>();
list.Add(person);
}
public IEnumerator GetEnumerator()
{
for (int i = 0; i < list.Count; i++)
{
yield return list[i];
}
}
}
Syntax errors indeed. This would work though:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var staff = new Staff();
staff.AddPerson(new Person(12, "John Doe"));
staff.AddPerson(new Person(12, "Jande Doe"));
foreach (var person in staff)
{
Console.WriteLine(person.Name);
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
public class Person
{
public int Age { get; private set; }
public string Name { get; private set; }
public Person(int age, string name)
{
Name = name;
Age = age;
}
}
public class Staff : IEnumerable<Person>
{
private List<Person> staff = new List<Person>();
public void AddPerson(Person p)
{
this.staff.Add(p);
}
public IEnumerator<Person> GetEnumerator()
{
return this.staff.GetEnumerator();
}
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return this.staff.GetEnumerator();
}
}
I'm getting the impression that you want to enumerate the collection of persons through the staff class. You can do that by implementing IEnumerable and return the enumerator of the people list. So that's what I did.
I implemented IEnumerable to return a strongly typed enumerator and shortened some of your code. Hope it helps.
I've written a CustomerCollection class, which implements the IEnumerable and IEnumerator interfaces. Now I want the CustomerCollection class object to be searchable by Where() And Find() function and also would like to get a List object of type Customer From the CustomerCollection class. Please help. Also, is the implementation of the interfaces right.
public class Customer
{
private int _CustomerID;
private string _CustomerName;
public Customer(int customerID)
{
this._CustomerID = customerID;
}
public int CustomerID
{
get
{
return _CustomerID;
}
set
{
_CustomerID = value;
}
}
public string CustomerName
{
get
{
return _CustomerName;
}
set
{
_CustomerName = value;
}
}
}
public class CustomerController
{
public ArrayList PopulateCustomer()
{
ArrayList Temp = new ArrayList();
Customer _Customer1 = new Customer(1);
Customer _Customer2 = new Customer(2);
_Customer1.CustomerName = "Soham Dasgupta";
_Customer2.CustomerName = "Bappa Sarkar";
Temp.Add(_Customer1);
Temp.Add(_Customer2);
return Temp;
}
}
public class CustomerCollection : IEnumerable, IEnumerator
{
ArrayList Customers = null;
IEnumerator CustomerEnum = null;
public CustomerCollection()
{
this.Customers = new CustomerController().PopulateCustomer();
this.CustomerEnum = Customers.GetEnumerator();
}
public void SortByName()
{
this.Reset();
}
public void SortByID()
{
this.Reset();
}
public IEnumerator GetEnumerator()
{
return (IEnumerator)this;
}
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return (IEnumerator)this;
}
public void Reset()
{
CustomerEnum.Reset();
}
public bool MoveNext()
{
return CustomerEnum.MoveNext();
}
public object Current
{
get
{
return (Customer)CustomerEnum.Current;
}
}
}
You can call Cast<Customer>() on your IEnumerable which will give you an IEnumerable<Customer>, or just implement IEnumerable<Customer> to begin with. LINQ is almost entirely hooked into IEnumerable<T>, not IEnumerable. Once you did that you'd get all the LINQ to objects goodness for free.
I recommend to use OfType<T>() instead of Cast<T>() because if your collection contains T1 and T2, collection.Cast<T1>() will throw an error while collection.OfType<T1>() will return IEnumerable<T1> contains only instances of T1 not T2
This will do what you want. Note, I have abstracted out the IEnumerable to make it reusable and reduced the complexity of all of the other classes.
//Write your Test first
public class Test
{
public void TestEnumerator()
{
var customers = new CustomerCollection();
var qry =
from c in customers
select c;
foreach (var c in qry)
{
Console.WriteLine(c.CustomerName);
}
//Create a new list from the collection:
var customerList = new List<Customer>(customers);
}
}
public abstract class MyColl<T> : IEnumerable<T>
{
protected T[] Items;
public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator()
{
foreach (T item in Items)
{
yield return item;
}
}
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return GetEnumerator();
}
}
public class Customer
{
public Customer(int customerID)
{
CustomerID = customerID;
}
public int CustomerID { get; set; }
public string CustomerName { get; set; }
}
public class CustomerController
{
public Customer[] PopulateCustomer() {
return new [] {new Customer(1) {CustomerName = "Soham Dasgupta"},
new Customer(2) {CustomerName = "Bappa Sarkar"}};
}
}
public class CustomerCollection : MyColl<Customer>
{
public CustomerCollection()
{
Items = new CustomerController().PopulateCustomer();
}
}
public class CustomerController
{
public List<Customer> PopulateCustomer()
{
List<Customer> Temp = new ArrayList();
Customer _Customer1 = new Customer(1);
Customer _Customer2 = new Customer(2);
_Customer1.CustomerName = "Soham Dasgupta";
_Customer2.CustomerName = "Bappa Sarkar";
Temp.Add(_Customer1);
Temp.Add(_Customer2);
return Temp;
}
}
public class CustomerCollection : List<Customer>
{
List<Customer> Customers = new List<Customer>();
public CustomerCollection()
{
this.Customers = new CustomerController().PopulateCustomer();
}
}
new List<Customer>(myCustomerEnumerator);
The recommended base class to use for creating your own collection implementations is System.Collections.ObjectModel.Collection<T>
(from MSDN)
This base class is provided to make it easier for implementers to create a custom collection. Implementers are encouraged to extend this base class instead of creating their own.
public class CustomerCollection : Collection<Customer>
{
}