Develop Reference

ASP.Net Web API vs WCF, which one should I choose in my project

I have read many articles in the web so far, about the differences between WCF and ASP.Net web API. Unfortunately I could not come up to a clear idea about what will serve my purpose. Most of the Articles I have read highlighted on the design point of view of the two web services. But I am confused what will work best for my project and why? Here is my brief description of the project.
I need to create a communication channel between two servers (both are written in C#). The servers will communicate using messages (certain type of commands). The messages sometimes can be only acknowledgements, and sometimes the messages may contain instructions to do some computation. For example, one message can be draw something, or send an SMS etc. And not necessarily the messages will involve any database transactions. But the messages can sometimes send large text files as payload (around 1-5 MB maxm). What I believe WCF is very will surely do this, but can I do the same with ASP.net web API. Because so far all the example I have seen for ASP.Net web api: they are good for RESTful services that manipulate some kind of DB store (GET, PUT, DELETE). But in my case I will need to expose service points that will
do some kind of processing such as return the value of a computation, sending and acknowledging messages, etc.
Not just manipulating a DB-store.
So, what should be the best and simplest way to do so? It is needed to be mentioned that I did not find any straight forward example of achieving this using ASP.Net web API.

The Question you have asked is an overly-broad or primarily opinion-based, and its hard to give an example for what you have asked.
Important Points:
Firstly, if you are going to create a service which would be used on different platforms, then go with WCF.
Secondly, if you are creating internet service which is going to use external resource, then go with Web API.
Web API is the best choice if you are going to create a service for low bandwidth devices or mobile devices to access client.HTTP
request/response is also more readable as compared to SOAP because it
contains header, body, etc. which makes it complex.
Just take few minutes and read the below article, until you get complete understanding of few principles.
Original Source Can be found Here, Here and Here.
To whom choose between WCF or WEB API :
Choose WCF when you want to create a service that should support special scenarios such as one way messaging, message queues, duplex communication etc.
Choose WCF when you want to create a service that can use fast transport channels when available, such as TCP, Named Pipes, or maybe even UDP (in WCF 4.5), and you also want to support HTTP when all other transport channels are unavailable.
Choose Web API when you want to create a resource-oriented services over HTTP that can use the full features of HTTP (like URIs, request/response headers, caching, versioning, various content formats).
Choose Web API when you want to expose your service to a broad range of clients including browsers, mobiles, iphone and tablets.
Why to choose Web API
Web API doesn't have tedious and extensive configuration like WCF REST service.
It is very simple, creating service with Web API. Where as With WCF REST, service creation is bit difficult (requires clear understanding of configurations).
Web API is only based on HTTP and HTTPS and easy to define, expose and consume in a REST-full way.
Web API is light weight architecture and good for devices which have limited bandwidth like smart phones.
My Opinion:
Simplest way to do so - Web API (Since you dont have any examples for this)
Hardest Way is (Configurations) - WCF (Better go with WCF, since you have examples)
I hope this gives you a clear idea about what to choose...

First things first, RESTful is a stateless and uniform interface norm that can be applied to web services. It doesn't have to be automatically and only plain old CRUD service backed by a DB.
In the real world, we can hardly say that all web REST API respect fully the norm, in fact they don't most of the time, especially the stateless part.
For your message based API, especially if it's bidirectional and event based, you can use websockets and consider the REST API a way to expose an uniform, stateless web interface to create those. And yes you can use websockets with ASP.NET WebApi there's plenty of tutorial out there, even for the newer ASP.NET Core.
The "between services" interactions part is no different than the usual Web browser <=> Web service, you're just using C# code instead of JS for the client.
I can hardly recommend WCF that uses SOAP since it's hardly portable considering the web standards nowadays. For instance if want to use a browser client instead of another ASP.NET service, well you'll have to do additional code client side to handle supports.
You can use WCF websockets, providing the almost all the advantages of WCF SOAP.
tl;dr :
You can mix RESTful and Websockets, it can actually be better than going full REST or full Websockets
It's personal preference to use SOAP over websockets but do comes with a potential technical debt considering what you want to do afterwards
Message API between services is no different than a message API between a service and a browser

WebAPI is not just good for RESTful webservices. You can easily send requests to a WebAPI controller and handle it the way you want : calculations, sending messages, interact with a CRM, interact with DB or anything else.
WCF was created to manage SOAP based webservices and brings extra complexity. It handles TCP, Mime...
If you just need to handle HTTP requests, the simplest way is to go with WebAPI.

I would suggest Web API if it is for RESTful services as WCF was never made to serve as Restful services although you can serve as one where as Web API was made particularly for this.

N-Tier Application Authentication (RabbitMQ as Broker and C# as Business Tier) - WIF possible?

I'm currently devoloping a N-Tier Application with C# as Business Tier. It's a kind of ERP and I need authentication (email/password) for this app.
I need also permissions based on the login (create orders, delete articles)
All this informations should be stored in one database.
As UI Clients I planned to make WPF Client, ASP.Net and maybe in future iPhone/Android.
As message broker I use RabbitMQ (Clients talk to Business Layer only over AMQP. Due to the advanteges I have more than one Business Layer for round robin dispatching).
On my research for authentication in N-Tier applications I found one advise for Windows Identity Foundation. WIF is completly new for me. All the examples I found handle only ASP.Net Applications.
My question now is:
Is WIF the right thing for me or should I implement this session handling on my own?
If WIF can fit my needs, what is the best way to handle this?
Do I have to implement a custom STS and place it within a WCF Service?

As you are explicitly mentioning RabbitMq, I am suggesting ServiceStack for your service interface.
One issue with MQs in general is that they are decoupled from any meta information, such as HTTP Headers, to inject authentication. You should in contrast provide a property Session (with pre authentication) or UserName and Password in your message (where the later one is not prefered, as the credentials are passed in plain). A sample solution with the built-in SessionFeature of ServiceStack is available in their documentation.
Another nice feature of ServiceStack is that you can decorate your handlers not only with AuthenticateAttribute but also with RequiredRoleAttribute and RequiredPermissionAttribute.
Also: How do you plan to queue a message with Android? Can you expose the internal MQ to the outside, and is there a client available for eg Android? Therefore I suggest a dual endpoint over HTTP to queue messages in whatever MQ you choose to use. More information on how to integrate MQ in your HTTP service is available in the documentation.
With ServiceStack you can spin as many consumer instances you want, as there is a plain communication without all the serivce stuff available.
Trivia: As I am authoring an upcoming book on Mastering ServiceStack I am a little bit biased. Nevertheless I do cover most of your questions in the book, and provide code examples: Bits and pieces to your scenario are already covered here (do not get frightened by specific MQ, they are interchangeable).

Alfresco 4 webservice implementation with C#

I need to create a website in C# and need to use alfresco web service for process. In my site I need to create all the process that alfresco does through web service. I have seen the web services links in alfresco site. Its not documented as expected. I googled and found this one http://forge.alfresco.com/gf/project/dotnet/frs/
But this open source is in VB.NET. I need the same in C#. Can you please help me out?
Regards
Dipen

I suggest to consider other APIs before starting the developement of your application.
The Alfresco Web Services API is based on the SOAP protocol and it was the first API exposed by Alfresco. It was mainly created to work on Enterprise Services Bus (ESB) contexts and it could be useful only if you need to execute a vector of operations against the repository exchanging messages.
This API is based on a different model/schema called Content Manipulation Language (CML) that was created by Alfresco for managing remote calls. Personally I think that this is not easy to understand because it is quite different from the core model of Alfresco.
So I suggest to avoid the use of the Alfresco Web Services API.
Now the best approach that I suggest is to use CMIS (REST binding) or Spring WebScripts.
CMIS is a new standard supported by many ECM systems now and it stands for Content Management Interoperability Services. It contains some CRUDs methods to manipulate contents in the repository.
You could have some issues using CMIS only if you are using some specific Alfresco features that are not mapped in the CMIS specification.
The good point is that your client application based on CMIS can talk with any CMIS-compliant repository (Alfresco, OpenText, SharePoint, FileNet, Hippo, etc...)
Another good approach is to use the Alfresco REST API (WebScripts) that you can extend for your needs to expose REST methods that can be configured atomically.
This means that you can expose an HTTP method from Alfresco with your custom URL that can execute many operations in the repo but atomically. This means that if some errors are returned, the framework will rollback for you :)

WCF vs ASP.NET Web API [closed]

Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I've spent a few months trying to grasp the concepts behind WCF and recently I've developed my first WCF service application.
I've struggled quite a bit to understand all the settings in the config file.
I am not convinced about the environment but it seems that you can do amazing stuff with it.
The other day I've found out that Microsoft has come out with a new thing called ASP.NET Web API.
For what I can read it's a RESTful framework, very easy to use and implement.
Now, I am trying to figure out what are the main differences between the 2 frameworks and if I should try and convert my old WCF service application with the new API.
Could someone, please, help me to understand the differences and usage of each?

For us, WCF is used for SOAP and Web API for REST. I wish Web API supported SOAP too. We are not using advanced features of WCF. Here is comparison from MSDN:

The new ASP.NET Web API is a continuation of the previous WCF Web API project (although some of the concepts have changed).
WCF was originally created to enable SOAP-based services. For simpler RESTful or RPCish services (think clients like jQuery) ASP.NET Web API should be good choice.

ASP.net Web API is all about HTTP and REST based GET,POST,PUT,DELETE with well know ASP.net MVC style of programming and JSON returnable; web API is for all the light weight process and pure HTTP based components. For one to go ahead with WCF even for simple or simplest single web service it will bring all the extra baggage. For light weight simple service for ajax or dynamic calls always WebApi just solves the need. This neatly complements or helps in parallel to the ASP.net MVC.
Check out the podcast : Hanselminutes Podcast 264 - This is not your father's WCF - All about the WebAPI with Glenn Block by Scott Hanselman for more information.

In the scenarios listed below you should go for WCF:
If you need to send data on protocols like TCP, MSMQ or MIME
If the consuming client just knows how to consume SOAP messages
WEB API is a framework for developing RESTful/HTTP services.
There are so many clients that do not understand SOAP like Browsers, HTML5, in those cases WEB APIs are a good choice.
HTTP services header specifies how to secure service, how to cache the information, type of the message body and HTTP body can specify any type of content like HTML not just XML as SOAP services.

Since using both till now, I have found many differences between WCF and Web API. Both technology stacks are suited well to different scenarios, so it is not possible to say which is better, this depends on configuration and scenario.
Properties ASP.Net Web API WCF
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End point (mainly) Http based SOAP based
Service Type Front End Back-end
Support caching, compression, versioning No
Framework ASP.net WCF
Orientation Resource Oriented Service Oriented
Transports http http, tcp, MSMQ, Named pipe
Message pattern Request reply request Reply, one way, duplex
Configuration overhead Less Much
Security lesser than WCF (web standard security) Very high (WS-I standard)
Hosting IIS IIS, Windows Service, Self hosting
Performance Fast A bit slower than Web API
In use from .NET 4.0 .NET 3.5
Note: The data is not only my view, it is also collected from other official websites.

WCF will give you so much of out the box, it's not even comparable to anything. Unless you want to do on your own implementation of (to name a few) authentication, authorization, encryption, queuing, throttling, reliable messaging, logging, sessions and so on. WCF is not [only] web services; WCF is a development platform for SOA.

Why I'm answering:
I took huge amount of time to understand the difference between these two technologies. I'll put all those points here that I think "If I had these points at the time when I was wondering around in search of this answer, then I have decided very earlier in selecting my required technology."
Source of Information:
Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2015 Unleashed
ISBN-13: 978-0-672-33736-9 ISBN-10: 0-672-33736-3
Why ASP.NET Web API and WCF:
Before comparing the technologies of ASP.NET Web API and WCF, it is important to understand there are actually two styles/standards for creating web services: REST (Representational State Transfer) and SOAP/WSDL. The SOAP/WSDL was the original standard on which web services were built. However, it was difficult to use and had bulky message formats (like XML) that degraded performance. REST-based services quickly became the alternative. They are easier to write because they leverage the basic constructs of HTTP (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) and typically use smaller message formats (like JSON). As a result, REST-based HTTP services are now the standard for writing services that strictly target the Web.
Let's define purpose of ASP.NET Web API
ASP.NET Web API is Microsoft’s technology for developing REST-based HTTP web services. (It long ago replaced Microsoft’s ASMX, which was based on SOAP/WSDL.) The Web API makes it easy to write robust services based on HTTP protocols that all browsers and native devices understand. This enables you to create services to support your application and call them from other web applications, tablets, mobile phones, PCs, and gaming consoles. The majority of applications written today to leverage the ever present Web connection use HTTP services in some way.
Let's now define purpose of WCF:
Communicating across the Internet is not always the most efficient means. For example, if both the client and the service exist on the same technology (or even the same machine), they can often negotiate a more efficient means to communicate (such as TCP/IP). Service developers found themselves making the same choices they were trying to avoid. They now would have to choose between creating efficient internal services and being able to have the broad access found over the Internet. And, if they had to support both, they might have to create multiple versions of their service or at least separate proxies for accessing their service. This is the problem Microsoft solved with WCF.
With WCF, you can create your service without concern for boundaries. You can then let WCF worry about running your service in the most efficient way, depending on the calling client. To manage this task, WCF uses the concept of endpoints. Your service might have multiple endpoints (configured at design time or after deployment). Each endpoint indicates how the service might support a calling client: over the Web, via remoting, through Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ), and more. WCF enables you to focus on creating your service functionality. It worries about how to most efficiently speak with calling clients. In this way, a single WCF service can efficiently support many different client types.
Example of WCF:
Consider the example:
The customer data is shared among the applications. Each application might be written on a different platform, and it might exist in a different location. You can extract the customer interface into a WCF service that provides common access to shared customer data. This centralizes the data, reduces duplication, eliminates synchronization, and simplifies management. In addition, by using WCF, you can configure the service endpoints to work in the way that makes sense to the calling client. Figure shows the example from before with centralized access of customer data in a WCF service.
Conclusion:
i) When to choose Web API:
There is no denying that REST-based HTTP services like those created using ASP.NET Web API have become the standard for building web services. These services offer an easy, straightforward approach for web developers building services. Web developers understand HTTP GET and POST and thus adapt well to these types of services. Therefore, if you are writing services strictly targeted to HTTP, ASP.NET Web API is the logical choice.
ii) When to choose WCF:
The WCF technology is useful when you need to support multiple service endpoints based on different protocols and message formats. Products like Microsoft BizTalk leverage WCF for creating robust services that can be used over the Web as well via different machine-to-machine configurations.If, however, you do need to write an application that communicates over TCP/IP when connected to the local network and works over HTTP when outside the network, WCF is your answer.
Be Warned:
Web developers often view WCF as more difficult and complex to develop against. Therefore, if you do not foresee the need for multiprotocol services, you would likely stick with ASP.NET Web API.

There is a comparison on MSDN about this
WCF and ASP.NET Web API
For me, the choice was about Who the clients are, and where are they located?
Within the company Network and .NET based clients : Use WCF with TCP binding (Fast communication than HTTP)
Outside the company Network, and use diverse technologies like PHP, Python etc: Use Web API with REST

Business speaking, WebApi lacks of a WSDL, so the developers should document all manually. And if, for example, the WebApi operation returns a list of objects then, the client should creates the objects manually, i.e. WebAPI is really prone to errors of definitions.
The pro of Webapi is its more lightweight than WCF.

Regarding the statement "WebApi lacks of WSDL" there are several ways to generate Rest client. One popular approach is Swagger UI / (Swashbukkle Nuget). This gives a rich interface to understand the REST end point's input and output schema and online tool to test the end points.
JSON LD (Json Linked Documents) is another emerging standard which will further improve the JSON based REST developer experience by exposing the JSON schema with better semantics.

With wcf we can configure and expose the same service support for multiple endpoints like tcp, http.if you want your service to be only http based then it will be better to go with web API. Web API has very less configuration when compared to wcf and is bit faster than wcf. Wcf also supports restful services. If you have limitation of .Net framework 3.5 then your option is wcf.

KISS: Simple C# application which communicates with a RESTful web service

Following the KISS principle, I suddenly realised the following:
In .NET, you can use the Entity Model Framework to wrap around a database.
This model can be exposed as a web service through WCF.
This web service would have a very standardized definition.
A client application could be created which could consume any such RESTful web service.
I don't want to re-invent the wheel and it wouldn't surprise me if someone has already done this, so my question is simple: Has anyone already created a simple (desktop, not web) client application that can consume a RESTful service that's based on the Entity Framework and which will allow the user to read and write data directly to this service?
Otherwise, I'll just have to "invent" this myself. :-)Problem is, the database layer and RESTful service is already finished. The RESTful service will only stay in the project during it's development phase, since we can use the database-layer assembly directly from the web applications that are build around it. When the web application is deployed, the RESTful services are just kept out of the deployment.
But the database has a lot of data to manage over nearly 50 tables. When developing against a local database, we can have straight access to the database so I wouldn't need this tool for this. When it's deployed, the web application would be the only way to access the data so I could not use this tool. But we're also having a test phase where the database is stored on another system outside the local domain and this database is not available for developers. Only administrators have direct access to this database, making tests a bit more complex.
However, through the RESTful service, I can still access the data directly. Thus, when some test goes wrong, I can repair the data through this connection or just create a copy of the data for tests on my local system. There's plenty of other functionality and it's even possible to just open the URL to a table service straight in Excel or XMLSpy to see the contents. But when I want to write something back, I have to write special code to do just that. A generic tool that would allow me to access the data and modify it would be easier. Since it's a generic setup around the ADO.NET Data services, this should be reasonable easy too.
Thus, I can do it but hoped someone else has already done something similar. But it appears that there's no such tool made yet...

You are referring to ADO.Net Data Services. It basically creates an Entity Database Model and adds a REST frontend to the service using ASMX. There is a How To article availble from MSDN here on consuming the service using .Net. I have also done the same thing using the normally WebClient class in .Net in the past.
You can also look at the WCF REST Starter Kit if you want to roll your own based on Entity Framework. The starter kit also contains a handy new WebClient class that can be used to communicate with REST services.
Clarification
There is no prebuilt application client that I am aware off which will talk to these service, since they are pretty much accessing the data using Web Services. There is the Microsoft Smart Client Factory which is most likely the closest thing I have worked with.
I mentioned the above 2 options since they already have libraries in .Net that work with them directly, either as a referenced Web Service, or for the more adventurious, myself included, using the WebClient library or alternatively the new HTTPClient library in the WCF REST Starter kit.
I have used both, in Windows, Web, Silverlight and WCF. The latter being the easiest since they are focussed at REST.
We are currently investigating Prism which strongly leans to using this method when using WCF for front-end development.
Assumption
With regards to this question, you are making a generic assumption that wrapping ADO Entity Framework with a WCF service it will be generic. ADO.Net Data Services is the closest you will get, however the structure of the database will fundamently change the way you interact with it. Going a level higher in a "generic" way would be dangerous, as these 2 technologies, individually or together, are already as generic as possible.

In addition to Data Services (+1), consider RIA Services. It's like a domain-specific version of data services for Silverlight or WPF clients. Less flexible, but easier, than Data Services.