iam using c#,asp.net and iis, i want to simulate slow internet connection on my pc for testing my app.
is it possible i can control bandwidth of iis.
please dont suggest
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(someDuration);
in c# file.
You can run Fiddler and use its connection throttling to simulate a slow connection.
Note that you'll need to browse to your machine name, not localhost. (localhost. should also work)
Fiddler will do this for you.
You could find or create a proxy that provides file-configurable or UI-modifyable speed controls. The proxy would get the request from the client, make the request to the server, receive the response, then s-l-o-w-l-y send the response to the client. (It would probaly use some sort of Thread.Sleep(x) in between sending each byte of the response to the client.)
After searching a little on the internet, I found no freeware/FOSS on win32 that does the job for arbitrary ports.
I have a server under tests that listens on port 13000 and a client under test that has a configurable sending port. Many tools, designed for web only, make a throttling tunnel from port 80 to something configurable, but my server will never listen on port 80..
Anyone knows something like unix 'tc' command?
This isn't linked to C#, but I would suggest to slow down the system network (or the vm network ..) instead, it should be much easier to play around.
In linux, we can use tc.
sudo tc qdisc add dev wlp3s0 root netem delay 500ms
To turn it off:
sudo tc qdisc del dev wlp3s0 root netem
Source: http://jvns.ca/blog/2017/04/01/slow-down-your-internet-with-tc/
https://linux.die.net/man/8/tc
Related
That's it. It's a newbie question, probably. I'm almost giving up on TcpClient/Listener because of NAT and firewall issues. I wanted to know if theres an alternative. port 80 probably doesn't have to deal with any of these annoying things. I hope the answer is Yes.
What about the SignalR over WebScockets
Yes, you can implement WebSockets in a non-browser application, but it won't solve your problem.
When you try to open a server listening to websocket connections, you will run into the same problem you ran into when you created a normal socket connection: Personal firewall solutions will get in the way and not every router will forward the port you've chosen. Using the well-known port 80 won't help you here. It is quite uncommon for normal consumers to have a webserver running behind their NAT router, so by default no NAT router will forward the port unless specifically configured to do so.
A NAT router will generally prevent any hosts behind it to act as servers unless configured to allow it. When you want the users to not worry about their NAT configuration, both users must act as clients. The only way to do this is by having a central server all players connect to.
While hosting a server is still not free, it has become quite cheap due to cloud-based hosters who will rent you small, virtualized servers for very modest prices. The smallest instance from Amazon EC2 only costs you 2 cents per hour or $14.40 per month. Or you can build your own server from some spare-parts and host it on your own internet connection. When you don't have a static IP address you can use a dynamic nameserver service like no-ip or DynDNS.
Yes you can, but please don't.
I would suggest to change your architecture:
Use a server socket as a main point to handle clients. This server has to have a visible IP/port. In this case you may have clients behind nuts, and do not bother.
I was wondering it it was possible to relay a socket object in either C# or Java? (Preferably C#)
I have lots of little programs i make and host them on my home pc, but my pc is behind a router, so i have to forward a port on my router every time i want to make a new application. So is there a way to send a tcp connection to another application on the same computer? for instance i get a connection in with the first line of text being RELAY::21005 which would then forward that port to localhost:21005 ?
Any help, tutorials, code snippets would be much appreciated. Thank you! :)
One problem you might face with your suggested solution (first line identifies target port) is that you'll have to change all of your client programs to send that first line. That's easy for programs you've written yourself but not so convenient if you want to connect to your PC's web server or ssh daemon etc. It's not impossible of course, but does make it hard.
I'd suggest your routing server listens on two ports - a control port and a "normal" port (I can't think of a better name at the moment). You would send control messages to the control port to indicate "until further notice redirect all incoming connections on the normal port to port nnnn". That avoids having to manipulate client protocols.
I don't know enough C# to provide advice about a C# solution, but in Java I'd simply do something like:
while (true) {
acceptConnectionOnNormalPort()
connectToTargetPort()
startThreadCopyingDataFromAcceptedPortToTargetPort()
startThreadCopyingDataFromTargetPortToAcceptedPort()
}
You'd not be able to scale that easily into thousands of connections...
K I take back my comment, check this out:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa395195.aspx
Using this requires the port sharing service to be up (it is disabled by default):
The Net.TCP Port Sharing Service is available on all operating systems
that support .NET Framework 3.0, but the service is not enabled by
default.
All of this is only useful to you if you are using WCF services tho.
The easiest approach IMO is to use ssh tunneling. As I wrote in my comment, there are lots of questions on SU that will show you how to do this.
But assuming that you want to program something ...
You'll need to create a client and a server. The client will have threads that call accept on whatever local ports you want to open. When a connection comes to a port, you create another thread that opens a connection to the server and continually sends data over the wire.
The server program listens on a single port, which you open in your firewall. It waits for connections on that port, and when it receives one it opens a connection to the specified local port. Then it shuffles bytes from one to the other.
The only trick is that you have to define a protocol for specifying the destination port in the client-server stream. Simplest approach is to write a two-byte integer at the start of the stream.
Yes, it is possible to relay a socket.
You can use TURN http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traversal_Using_Relay_NAT
Some of TURN library/application:
pjnath
turnserver.sourceforge.net
I have a standard web server that serve web pages.
I want to monitor traffic on port 80, intercept every http responses, and add/inject an additionnal header to them.
The process will then act like a proxy between the web server and the client.
Could you please give me some pointers? I'm already aware of SharpPCap, but I'm not sure where to start.
Note: I can't rely on the web server, I can't control it or change it's configuration. However I can install any other process on the same machine.
Thanks a million
I think that SharpPCap is an overkill here.
Try:
listen on a port (say 8080)
for each incoming connection, accept and open one to the server (original one, port 80)
pass everything that comes in from the client straight to the server
pass everything that comes from the server back to the client, monitoring the stream and injecting/modifying if needed
I think what you want to do can be done with IIS 7.0 URL Rewrite module instead of rolling your own code.
http://learn.iis.net/page.aspx/711/modifying-http-response-headers/
I am writing you because of a new problem I need to solve, and I have now been banging my head against a wall for too long now.
Basically, I need to create an application that can take care of the following:
A user starts an app, which sends a broadcast to the subnet, and recieves a response of all servers there with their IP (and some additional info). The user can then select what server he wants to connect to.
Making it work is simple enough, with identifying the subnet, and broadcasting with UDP, and then having a different server application recieving it and sending back a response . The problem lies with these restrictions, that I need to take into consideration:
There will most likely also be clients on the server machines in the network, meaning that we can assume that the application is present on all machines. Every machine needs to have the listener running, and every machine can launch the GUI for selecting a server.
I am only allowed to add one exception to the firewall - an exception that handles both sending out the broadcasts, recieving broadcasts, sending answers and recieving answers.
I should also only be adding one Windows Service
on a server machine, the listener should run as a windows service, so the user won't notice it. Nor will the user notice, that the response is sent back to the client.
On the client machine, the user can start an application, which will notify the application to emmit the broadcast, and will get all the server responses, so the user can choose one to connect to.
Besides from the application that the user launches in order to select a server, there should be no interaction with the user whatsoever. Not even a popup, requesting the user to allow traffic trough the firewall - it should all be automatically
It needs to work on and in between Win XP, Win Vista and Win 7.
I don't know if I am putting too many constrains on myself, but I really hope that I can make the application with these requirements.
I have a few ideas - I just need to figure out how to do it:
Should i make everything into one application, that I add to the firewall exception list, so it will take care of the traffic on both the server and the client machines?
Should I add a custom exception to the firewall, allowing UDP traffic on a specific port, and then have all traffic flow trough that?
Is there a third and better option for managing that?
It is OK to have the service running on both client and server machines. But can it take care of everything for me - like it handling both the broadcast send/recieve and answer send/recieve? And is there any way to extract the information about servers on the network from a service?
I know it is a lot, but I really hope that you will be able to help me out.
let me know if I wasn't clear enough, or if you need further explanations.
I am coding in C# .Net, and I can utilize all I want from the .Net framework. As soon as I have this functionality implemented
All the best
/Sagi
The kind of peer-to-peer networking problems become simple to the point of being trivial if you designate one machine as the master server. It should have a well-known name that all sub-servers can connect to so they can publish (and withdraw) their availability. A client can then send a query request to the same server and get a list of known servers in return.
This can also solve your firewall problem, the master server could be listening on port 80.
Look into the System.Net.PeerToPeer namespace for a p2p solution supported by the framework.
Maybe a UPnP server and client may be a solution to your problem?
I need to able to block any and all connections to my pc from a specific IP address , i know this is possible with a firewall but i need to do this in c#. Any idea how (need code).
Update :
Its a generic C# app not asp.net , target platform is WinXp till Win7
Need more information... if you're talking socket communication, you can simply close the connection to a client as soon as it connects if the IP address is blocked, or process the Connection Request and evaluate there.
Edit: Simplest way for you would probably just be to interact with Windows Firewall API... here's how:
http://www.shafqatahmed.com/2008/01/controlling-win.html
Your question is unclear but I'll try to answer the best I can, within my understanding.
Do you want to control machines from connecting to any port on your machine? if so, you need to control the built-in windows firewall or find yourself a filter driver you can control. In order to write your own filter driver, you must leave the land of managed code, so I am guessing that's not an option.
To learn how to control the firewall, here's a link:
http://www.shafqatahmed.com/2008/01/controlling-win.html
more on google.
Do you want to control remote machines from connection to a port on your machines that your application owns? You cannot do that either (see #1 above). However you can take action after the connection, and close the connection if you don't like the remote IP (check the remote endpoint's IP).
two caveats with this approach:
It doesn't save you from a DoS attack.
You will need to be careful if you need ipv6 support (you can't just check the IPV4 address in that case)
HTH
A "firewall" in c#?
First you would have to access the network interface on a low level, eg.: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms817945.aspx
Then you have to parse all incoming packets and maybe discard them.
It's not an easy task and I don't recommend you to write a driver and a firewall in C#, because the .NET Framework will be loaded every time you start your machine.
Also traffic parsing can be tricky... I implemented a router/traffic analyzer in C# some time ago and it took me about one year to gain the experience with network programming to gain the knowledge to do this.