Can anyone explain to me what the following line of C# code does?
public event EventHandler<DataEventArgs<BusinessEntities.Employee>> EmployeeSelected = delegate { };
The bit that's really got me stumped is the delegate { } piece at the end. For a bit more context, the sample from the EmployeesListView.xaml.cs in the ViewInjection sample that ships with PRISM 2. The full class definition is shown below:
/// <summary>
/// Interaction logic for EmployeesListView.xaml
/// </summary>
public partial class EmployeesListView : UserControl, IEmployeesListView
{
public EmployeesListView()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public ObservableCollection<BusinessEntities.Employee> Model
{
get { return this.DataContext as ObservableCollection<BusinessEntities.Employee>; }
set { this.DataContext = value; }
}
public event EventHandler<DataEventArgs<BusinessEntities.Employee>> EmployeeSelected = delegate { };
private void EmployeesList_SelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.AddedItems.Count > 0)
{
BusinessEntities.Employee selected = e.AddedItems[0] as BusinessEntities.Employee;
if (selected != null)
{
EmployeeSelected(this, new DataEventArgs<BusinessEntities.Employee>(selected));
}
}
}
}
This bit:
delegate {}
just creates a "no-op" delegate of the appropriate type. That delegate is then assigned to the backing variable for the event. It's a simple way to avoid having to do null checks when raising an event - you always have at least one handler, which is the no-op handler.
It means that this code can be simple:
EmployeeSelected(this, new DataEventArgs<BusinessEntities.Employee>(selected));
Instead of:
EventHandler<DataEventArgs<BusinessEntities.Employee>> handler =EmployeeSelected;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, new DataEventArgs<BusinessEntities.Employee>(selected));
}
It's setting it to an anonymous method that does nothing basically. Why I'm not sure, maybe to avoid a check or something but I would consider that quite sloppy.
Related
I would like to notify a program immediately when there is a change in a bool variable that is a public variable of an object. For example;
say, an instance of class conn is created within a windows form application.
there is a Ready variable, a public variable of the class conn is present.
I would like to get notified whenever there is a change in this variable.
I did a quick research to solve this problem within stackoverflow but the answers suggested the use of property, which, I think is not suitable for my application.
I will assume you are referring to a field when you say public variable.
With few exceptions, it is preferable to not have public fields in C# classes, but rather private fields with public accessors:
class BadClass
{
public int Value; // <- NOT preferred
}
class GoodClass
{
private int value;
public int Value
{
get { return this.value; }
set { this.value = value; }
}
}
One of the reasons to structure your code this way is so you can do more than one thing in the property's getter and setters. An example that applies to your scenario is property change notification:
class GoodClass : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private int value;
public int Value
{
get { return this.value; }
set
{
this.value = value;
this.OnPropertyChanged("Value");
}
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private void OnPropertyChanged(string name)
{
if (this.PropertyChanged != null)
{
this.PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(name);
}
}
}
If you were to implement your class like this, you could use it this way:
void SomeMethod()
{
var instance = new GoodClass();
instance.PropertyChanged += this.OnPropertyChanged;
}
void OnPropertyChanged(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.PropertyName == "Value")
{
// Do something here.
}
}
If you change the Value property, not only will it change the value of the underlying field, but it will also raise the PropertyChanged event, and call your event handler.
You want to use the Observer pattern for this. The most straight forward way to do this in .NET is the event system. In the class conn, create an event:
public event EventHandler ReadyChanged;
and then when you create an instance of conn, subscribe to that event:
o.ReadyChanged += (s, e) =>
{
// do something
}
and then finally, when the flag changes in conn, fire the event via a new method named OnReadyChanged:
protected virtual void OnReadyChanged()
{
if (ReadyChanged != null) { ReadyChanged(this, new EventArgs()); }
}
I want my C# code to call an event whenever a value is assigned to my object.
How exactly would I need to go about that?
class MyClass {
ManualResetEvent mre;
public MyClass() {
mre = new ManualResetEvent(false);
Data = null;
}
public object Data { get; set; }
void DataSet(object sender, EventArgs e) {
Console.WriteLine("object Data has been set.");
mre.Set();
}
}
Delegates don't seem to be what I need. An event, maybe? How would I write such an event, if so?
MyClass mc;
void processA() {
mc = new MyClass();
mc.Data = GetDataFromLongProcess();
}
private object data;
public object Data {
get { return data;}
set {
if(value != data) {
data = value;
OnDataChanged();
}
}
}
protected virtual void OnDataChanged() {
EventHandler handler = DataChanged;
if(handler != null) handler(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
public event EventHandler DataChanged;
then hook any code to the DataChanged event. For example:
MyClass mc = ...
mc.DataChanged += delegate {
Console.WriteLine("new data! wow!");
};
If you want to fire an event when your property is set, you would do something like this:
public event Action OnDataChanged;
protected object _data = null;
public object Data
{
get { return _data; }
set
{
_data = value;
if(OnDataChanged != null)
OnDataChanged();
}
}
Then you would simply wire up event handlers to your object like so:
mc = new MyClass();
mc.OnDataChanged += delegate() { Console.WriteLine("It changed!"); };
mc.Data = SomeValue();
I think you're on the right track with an event-based model. Also take a look at the Observer pattern (which is the basis for .Net delegates and events underneath it all, as I understand):
http://www.dofactory.com/Patterns/PatternObserver.aspx
But the bottom line, as the other useful answer so far (Mr. Gravell's implementation) indicates, you're going to have to have code IN the setter to get it hooked up. The only alternative would be to poll the value for changes, which just smells bad to me.
you could implement INotifyPropertyChanged (this is more or less a event) or you could take your class a Action (Trigger) and call this, whenn the property changed.
Just don't use automatic properties but a concrete setter and call your event/trigger from there.
Conceptually, you would define an event in your class, and in your property set blocks, you would invoke the event with the necessary arguments to determine what just happened.
public event SomeDelegateThatTakesIntAsParameter myEvent;
void SetData(int data)
{
if(myEvent!= null)
myEvent(data)
}
Following is the Code i am using
class ImpersonatedTab : System.Windows.Forms.TabPage
{
Credentials _cred = new Credentials();
public delegate void Savesetting(TabData Tb);
public event Savesetting TriggerSaveSetting;
public ImpersonatedTab(TabData tb)
{
........
}
private void SaveData()
{
TriggerSaveSetting(_tabdata);
}
private Onclick()
{
SaveData();
}
}
When i call Onclick function within ImpersonatedTab class it returns error saying TriggerSaveSetting is null
I initialize this call like
ImpersonatedTab Tab = new ImpersonatedTab(tb);
Tab.TriggerSaveSetting += new ImpersonatedTab.Savesetting(Tab_TriggerSaveSetting);
i have created events earlier, but am not able to figure out whats wrong with this one.. i am sure should be some silly mistake.
One possible case where this could happen is if you try to call the event from within the constructor of the ImpersonatedTab class. There where you put those .... Also it is a good practice to check if the event handler has been initialized before calling it.
Change your code to this:
public delegate void Savesetting(TabData Tb);
private Savesetting saveSettingDlg;
public event Savesetting TriggerSaveSetting {
add { saveSettingDlg += value; }
remove { saveSettingDlg -= value; }
}
private void SaveData() {
var handler = saveSettingDlg;
if (handler != null) handler(_tabdata);
}
You can now set a breakpoint on the add accessor and SaveData() and verify that event subscription is working correctly. If you do see the add accessor getting called but still get a null for handler then there's a problem with the object reference.
You are trying to invoke the TriggerSaveSetting event handlers before any handler was attached to it. Make sure, to check, the event has been some handlers attached:
private void OnTriggerSaveSetting(_tabdata)
{
if (TriggerSaveSetting != null)
TriggerSaveSetting(_tabdata);
}
I have three objects ObjectA has an ObjectB, ObjectB has an ObjectC. When ObjectC fires an event I need ObjectA to know about it, so this is what I've done...
public delegate void EventFiredEventHandler();
public class ObjectA
{
ObjectB objB;
public ObjectA()
{
objB = new ObjectB();
objB.EventFired += new EventFiredEventHandler(objB_EventFired);
}
private void objB_EventFired()
{
//Handle the event.
}
}
public class ObjectB
{
ObjectC objC;
public ObjectB()
{
objC = new ObjectC();
objC.EventFired += new EventFiredEventHandler(objC_EventFired);
objC.FireEvent();
}
public event EventFiredEventHandler EventFired;
protected void OnEventFired()
{
if(EventFired != null)
{
EventFired();
}
}
private void objC_EventFired()
{
//objC fired an event, bubble it up.
OnEventFired();
}
}
public class ObjectC
{
public ObjectC(){}
public void FireEvent()
{
OnEventFired();
}
public event EventFiredEventHandler EventFired;
protected void OnEventFired()
{
if(EventFired != null)
{
EventFired();
}
}
}
Is this the proper way to handle this, or is there a better way? I don't want ObjectA to know about ObjectC at all, only that it raised an event.
Another approach, is to wrap it using add/remove:
public class ObjectB
{
ObjectC objC;
public ObjectB()
{
objC = new ObjectC();
}
public event EventFiredEventHandler EventFired
{
add { this.objC.EventFired += value; }
remove { this.objC.EventFired -= value; }
}
}
That's the way I do it. however I would recommend change your firing mechanism to this to make it thread safe
protected void OnEventFired()
{
var tmpEvent = EventFired;
if(tmpEvent != null)
{
tmpEvent();
}
}
This keeps it from failing if EventFired becomes null between the null check and the firing.
Also it is somewhat of a standard to follow the EventHandler pattern for your event delegates.
protected virtual void OnEventFired(EventArgs e)
{
var tmpEvent = EventFired;
if(tmpEvent != null)
{
tmpEvent(this, EventArgs.e);
}
}
I was wrong about the threadsafe pattern, here is the full threadsafe event pattern
/// <summary>
/// Delegate backing the SomeEvent event.
/// </summary>
SomeEventHandler someEvent;
/// <summary>
/// Lock for SomeEvent delegate access.
/// </summary>
readonly object someEventLock = new object();
/// <summary>
/// Description for the event
/// </summary>
public event SomeEventHandler SomeEvent
{
add
{
lock (someEventLock)
{
someEvent += value;
}
}
remove
{
lock (someEventLock)
{
someEvent -= value;
}
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Raises the SomeEvent event
/// </summary>
protected virtual OnSomeEvent(EventArgs e)
{
SomeEventHandler handler;
lock (someEventLock)
{
handler = someEvent;
}
if (handler != null)
{
handler (this, e);
}
}
As other answers have stated, this is they way to do it.
But you can go beyond!!! I've just implemented a good data structure on it, and it's like to give you a spin on it.
Would be nice to have an automatic event bubbling? You could implement it using Reflection. My way is to define an Interface/Base class which declares an event (or a set of events). Then, the parameterless constructor of a base class will iterate other its properties/fields, and register automatically the members events for event propagation.
There are some restriction on design, but if you have a deep structure and/or many (structured) events, it could be nice to have everything setup without any additional line of code.
An initial base class could be:
class BaseObject {
public BaseObject() {
FieldInfo[] fInfos = this.GetType().GetFields(...);
foreach (FieldInfo fInfo in fInfos) {
object fInfoValue = fInfo.GetValue(this, null);
if (fInfoValue is BaseObject) {
BaseObject bMemberObject = (BaseObject)fInfoValue;
bMemberObject.MyEvent += new EventHandler(delegate() {
if (this.MyEvent != null)
MyEvent();
});
}
}
public event MyEvent = null;
}
Of course, as already suggested, follow the event delegate delegate(object sender, EventArgs args) (I've used a simpler event for clarity).
Naturally, is implicit that you classes A, B and C derives directly from BaseObject.
Note that any logic could be implemented to bind structured events (you could be the nested event registration using the name and/or other reflected properties.
I am making a windows forms project in C#, in which I made a class LabelX which inherits System.Windows.Forms.Label, then added a property Mass of float type
Now, my question is how can I handle, when value of Mass is changed.
e.g.:
When user enter value zero or less than zero
I want to fire a message that "Mass can't be zero or negative"
If I am interpreting this correctly, there are two parts to this. First, you need to detect invalid values and throw exceptions. Second, you need to raise an event when the property changes. This can be achieved as follows.
private float mass;
public float Mass
{
get
{
return this.mass;
}
set
{
if (value <= 0.0F)
{
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("Mass cannot be zero or negative.");
}
if (this.mass != value)
{
this.mass = value;
OnMassChanged(EventArgs.Empty);
}
}
}
public event EventHandler MassChanged;
protected virtual void OnMassChanged(EventArgs args)
{
var handler = this.MassChanged;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, args);
}
}
To show a message if an invalid entry is made, you should put a try \ catch block around the call to set Mass and catch the ArgumentOutOfRangeException.
Try the following:
// Created an empty form with a LabelX control on it.
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
// Added this event from the property manager.
private void labelX1_MassChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
var label = (LabelX)sender;
if (label.Mass <= 0.0)
MessageBox.Show("Mass is less than or equal to 0");
}
}
public class LabelX : Label
{
private float _mass;
public float Mass
{
get { return _mass; }
set
{
if (!value.Equals(_mass))
{
_mass = value;
OnMassChanged(EventArgs.Empty);
}
}
}
public event EventHandler MassChanged;
protected virtual void OnMassChanged(EventArgs e)
{
if (MassChanged != null)
MassChanged(this, e);
}
}
Outside of your LabelX class, create the following class:
public class MassChangedEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public float Mass { get; private set; }
public MassChangedEventArgs(float mass)
{
this.Mass = mass;
}
}
Also outside of your LabelX class, create the following delegate. This will be your event handler.
public delegate void MassChangedEventHandler(object sender, MassChangedEventArgs e);
Within your LabelX class, create an event to broadcast:
public class LabelX
{
public event MassChangedEventHandler MassChanged;
//the rest of your code here...
}
You'll also want to create a private instance method that will fire your event.
public class LabelX
{
public event MassChangedEventHandler MassChanged;
private void OnMassChanged()
{
if(MassChanged!=null)
this.MassChanged(this, new MassChangedEventArgs(this.Mass));
}
//the rest of your code here...
}
Finally, whenever your Mass property changes, call OnMassChanged. For instance:
public class LabelX
{
private float mass;
public float Mass
{
get
{
return mass;
}
set
{
mass = value;
OnMassChanged();
}
}
public event MassChangedEventHandler MassChanged;
private void OnMassChanged()
{
if(MassChanged!=null)
this.MassChanged(this, new MassChangedEventArgs(this.Mass));
}
//the rest of your code here...
}
When you want to handle that event on a per-instance basis, you just have to register a listener with the MassChanged event of your underlying object and perform whatever actions are necessary.
Events are a common pattern used in the framework. The process typically involves defining a delegate to be used as the event handlers, declaring the event using the handler, defining methods to raise the event, then hooking up to the properties the logic to raise the event.
The message you describe is better done as an Exception but here's an example to define the MassChanged event.
// Define event args if you have additional
// information to pass to your event handlers
public class MassChangedEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public MassChangedEventArgs(int oldMass)
{
OldMass = oldMass;
}
public int OldMass { get; private set; }
}
public class SomeObject
{
// There's a generic event handler delegate that can be
// used so you only need to define the event arguments.
public event EventHandler<MassChangedEventArgs> MassChanged;
// Convenience method to raise the event
protected virtual void OnMassChanged(MassChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (MassChanged != null)
MassChanged(this, e);
}
public int Mass
{
get
{
return mass;
}
set
{
// Your checks here
if (value <= 0)
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("Mass", "Mass can't be zero or negative");
// Should only raise the event if the new value is different
if (value != mass)
{
// Change the mass
MassChangedEventArgs e = new MassChangedEventArgs(mass);
mass = value;
// Raise the event
OnMassChanged(e);
}
}
}
private int mass;
}
After that, it's just a matter of registering handlers to the event and going from there.
I am quite sure you you would like to 'fire' an exception in your case.
This more of a validation logic issue such AOP code contracts concept.
But if you really like to create an event for it you have to at least:
1) create an event storage variable in your label class
public event EventHandler MassChanged;
2) in your property (note that you loose the ability to use code gen functions of c# 3 for
which 'auto' implement the field to store your Mass property value)
public bool Mass
{
get { return _mass; }
set {
// check if value is invalid (0 or less) && that event subscribers exist
if(value<=0 && MassChanged != null) { MassChanged(this, null); }
else // otherwise assign ...
{
_mass = value;
}
}
}
3) create an event handler of type EventHandler
Best to read the msdn article for events: link text
Again I am pretty sure you are not handling exceptions properly in the app
if you need an event for this. I mean there is nothing wrong but events are
usually not used as means of value validations.