I have a rich client application that is connecting to a set of backing web services where the connection is secured by SSL. I need to determine the "strength" of the encryption being used for the actual SSL stream to display this information to the end user.
My understanding is that the client and server will negotiate a symmetric encryption method between them (SSL/TLS) with different levels of encryption (40,56,128,256). Is there any way I can detect which mode is being used from a HttpWebRequest/ServicePoint/other in C# code?
This expands upon #Alex's post, obviously add your own error handling
System.Net.Sockets.TcpClient TC = new System.Net.Sockets.TcpClient();
TC.Connect("mail.google.com", 443);
using (System.Net.Security.SslStream Ssl = new System.Net.Security.SslStream(TC.GetStream()))
{
Ssl.AuthenticateAsClient("mail.google.com");
Console.WriteLine(Ssl.CipherAlgorithm);
Console.WriteLine(Ssl.CipherStrength);
}
TC.Close();
I don't think you can access the SSL information from the web service directly, you'll have to use this helper code to talk to the host directly.
Since you have established an SslStream stream, you could use the following:
stream.CipherAlgorithm //to get the algorithm that is used
stream.CipherStrength //to get the strength of the cipher algorithm
You can find more information here.
Related
I have gRPC client / server code happily working on my local machine with the client using ChannelCredentials.Insecure but need to switch to a secure mode. I dont need any certificate checks just encrypted traffic.
Ive been unable to find any configuration of client server that talks to each other.
Running c# core server (gRPC 2.27.0), & c# .net framework client (gRPC 2.28.1).
The server says it publishing on http & https as below:
[20:12:58 DBG] Using development certificate: CN=localhost (Thumbprint: 3EDA2E5BD559D75C9DCF058E0A6994EED859CD34)
[20:12:58 INF] Now listening on: https://localhost:5001
[20:12:58 INF] Now listening on: http://localhost:5000
and client works with:
ChannelBase channel = new Channel("localhost:5000", ChannelCredentials.Insecure);
var client = new MyApp.MyAppClient(channel);
var response = client.Test(request)
If I switch client to SslCredentials as below
ChannelBase channel = new Channel("localhost:5001", new SslCredentials());
var client = new MyApp.MyAppClient(channel);
var response = client.Test(request)
I get the following errors.
server error
[19:32:53 DBG] Failed to authenticate HTTPS connection.
System.IO.IOException: Authentication failed because the remote party has closed the transport stream.
at System.Net.Security.SslStream.StartReadFrame(Byte[] buffer, Int32 readBytes, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest)
at System.Net.Security.SslStream.PartialFrameCallback(AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest)
client error
Grpc.Core.RpcException: 'Status(StatusCode=Unavailable, Detail="failed to connect to all addresses")'
I've also tried adding (server) with no change in errors.
services.AddAuthentication(CertificateAuthenticationDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddCertificate(options =>
{
options.RevocationMode = X509RevocationMode.NoCheck;
options.ValidateCertificateUse = false;
options.AllowedCertificateTypes = CertificateTypes.SelfSigned;
});
Any suggestions as to what i need to do to make them talk.
So you need to specify roots.pem that correspond to the dev certificate you're using on your server when creating SslCredentials.
If you use parameterless SslCredentials(), it will use the default trust roots which only work for certificates that have been signed by publicly trusted certificate authorities (e.g. if you're talking "official" servers such as googleapis.com etc, definitely not the case for your development certificates that you are using on your server). So you need to use SslCredentials(yourCustomTrustRootsPem).
Btw, with SSL/TLS, there's no such thing as "no certificate checks". The client will ALWAYS check that it connected to the right server (server's certificate are verifiable by their trust roots) - without that the secure communication would make no sense because it would be too susceptible to man-in-the-middle attack. (the server checking authenticity of client is optional though).
Feel free to refer to https://github.com/jtattermusch/grpc-authentication-kubernetes-examples for extra resources.
I had a similar problem and finally found a solution to establish HTTPs connection between
.NET Framework 4.7.2 client (WPF app) and
ASP .NET Core 3.1 gRPC Server (Console).
Indeed the answer of Jan Tattermusch is correct. You need to supply the server side certificate as PEM to the constructor of SslCredentials and in addition, the certificate has to contain the DNS name or IP of the url you are contacting the server through. In your case, I suggest to manually create a self-signed certificate for each server instead of using the developer certificate. This one can be downloaded by your client and then be passed as SslCredentials. Works like a charm.
See my more details on how to do all the details in my answer to a similar question here:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/63565090/378415
Try to check on which port Grpc Service is running after deployment in any way either windows service or other , then give the same in client to consume the service. Eg: If your service is running on https://localhost:5000 then give the same in client.
It will work for sure.
Mostly you will get the above issue when you make a mistake of mismatching the address of service to client.
This is the issue.
I have an https request. The request is is being sent as an SSL / TLS request (Not the CONNECT .... that comes from a browser with the proxy setup).
I need to write a proxy in c# that blocks a specific https://foo.com/foo.htm request but lets through https://foo.com/anything_else.htm.
I can do this fine creating a MITM attack with a new certificate etc etc.
But Im now wondering if there is an easy way to do this Im missing without using a MITM attack as I have no need to decrypt the data. I only need to know the URI/file.
I can easily just transfer streams but I want to know if there is a simple way to transfer the streams after I have read the URI and file.
I can write some fancy code to pull apart the tcp request and thats what I may have to do.
Anybody any ideas before I go down this path. Remember there is no CONNECT request. Just direct SSL / TLS.
The main reason for this is it just makes things simpler not creating self signed certificates etc.
Maybe its even possible to use the real certificate somehow from the server end as I dont need to decrypt any of the no header data.
I find the networking side of c# is not very well documented and a little all over the place.
Just for reference i can get the URI from the TcpClient using:
IPEndPoint ipEndPoint = (IPEndPoint)clientTcpClient.Client.RemoteEndPoint;
IPAddress ipAddress = ipEndPoint.Address;
// Get the hostname.
IPHostEntry ipHostEntry = Dns.GetHostEntry(ipAddress);
String hostName = ipHostEntry.HostName;
// Get the port.
Int32 port = ipEndPoint.Port;
But not the requested page.
While the target hostname might be visible in the TLS handshake as SNI extension or by analyzing the certificate returned by the server the path component of the URL is only contained in the HTTP request. Since this HTTP request is only done after TLS handshake and the request is thus already encrypted you cannot get to the full path without decrypting the request. This means that blocking access to a specific path is not possible without SSL man in the middle and thus requires a certificate for the target site owned by the man in the middle and trusted by the client.
Not that this is true for CONNECT requests too since these requests only contain the target hostname but the path component is again only contained in the encrypted HTTP request sent inside the tunnel created by CONNECT.
I need to encrypt the data that will be sent/received, client <> server and vice-versa.
Since I can't use SSLStream right now, I am looking for other alternatives.
While thinking about the alternatives I have, I got stucked on how would I send the data to the client in a way it can't be read/intercepted.
Here is how I thinked of doing it:
Client/Server will have a RSA private key inside the application that will be loaded from a string to encrypt/decrypt the data received from the server.
After the initial connection request, the server will send a session id along with a inner AES key/iv.
From here on the client will communicate using both, the RSA and the AES.
I would like to hear from experienced people some new ideas or better ways to do what I need here which is:
Send encrypted data from client to server and vice-versa without using SSLStream and yet having a good level of security.
I understand that having the private key on the client is risk but I am yet to find a better solution.
If you really can't use SSL, you can build poor man's SSL yourself:
The client knows a RSA public key, the server knows the corresponding private key.
To communicate the client creates a random session key that can be used with AES. It encrypts it with the RSA public key, and sends it to the server. It encrypts the rest of the communication with the AES session key.
The server decrypts the first message with the RSA private key, and thus gets the session key. It uses this key for the rest of the communication.
That way the client doesn't contain anything secret, but the communication itself is private. The main thing that's lacking with this scheme is client authentication.
You should also use different nonces/IVs for the server->client and the client->server stream. You might also want to add integrity checking(MACs).
The only way you can do this is using a shared secret: something both the client and the server know, but no-one else does.
Public key SSL works on the premise that a certificate (and hence a key-pair) is locked to a particular server/domain which can be independently confirmed via a third party (the signing authority).
As soon as you get rid of this premise, you are open to man-in-the-middle attacks with public key encryption because you cannot guarantee who you are talking to (or at least you cannot guarantee someone is not intercepting/relaying your messages).
If you use a shared secret, you don't need public keys, certificates or anything else - but if any unauthorised party discovers your secret, you're screwed.
A possible approach:
-Server has a well-known public key and a private key no one knows (not even the clients)
-Client generates a 'handshake' packet and encrypts it with the server's public key. The handshake packet contains any initialisation/authentication stuff you need, plus a randomly generated passphrase + IV to use for AES encryption.
-Server decrypts handshake packet using its private key and now has access to the AES passphrase + IV. It responds with an 'ACK' packet indicating its ready.
-Now client can send data using the AES passphrase to encrypt symmetrically, and the server can decrypt, and vice versa.
There's no need for the client having any private key bundled with it. RSA is specifically designed for data exchange without the need for a shared key.
I am trying to create an SSL Socket Server/Client between .NET and Java. In this case, my SSL Socket Server will run in .net and the client runs in Java under Linux. My problem is that the connection fails during the handshaking, specifically when the server request a certificate from the client, the client is unable to send something back and the connection fails.
In .net I am using sslStream to establish the connection and on Java I am using the standard SSLSocket. Some code snippets are below, but this is what I have so far:
On the server side (Windows), I have a private certificate in the Personal/Certificates folders under MMC. I have a public certificate from the client in the Trusted People/Certificates. Both certificates were issued by the same CA. The certificate chain for both certificates have multiple levels, but it is the same for both. The root level certificate in the chain is also installed in the trusted Certification Authorities/Certificates folder.
On the client side (Linux), I have a keystore that contains the private certificate that matches the public certificate installed at the server. I have a trust store that contains the public certificate from the server, matching the server's private one.
On the server side (.net) I am using a Socket that does an asynchronous read and then it gets wrapped into an SSLStream, the code snippet is like this:
NetworkStream ns = new NetworkStream(socket, false);
SslStream ssl = new SslStream(ns, true);
ssl.AuthenticateAsServer(serverCertificate, true, SslProtocols.Default, true);
The client code is pretty much standard code:
SSLSocketFactory factory = (SSLSocketFactory) SSLSocketFactory.getDefault();
InetAddress addr = InetAddress.getByName(servername);
SSLSocket socket = (SSLSocket) factory.createSocket(addr,port);
socket.setUseClientMode(true);
socket.setNeedClientAuth(true);
socket.setWantClientAuth(true);
socket.startHandshake();
os = new DataOutputStream(socket.getOutputStream());
is = new DataInputStream(socket.getInputStream());
byte[] outBuf = new byte[50];
os.write("SEND SOMETHING".getBytes("UTF-8"));
is.read(outBuf);
In java I have set the proper varialbes to point to the trust and key store with their password.
Now, following the standard SSL Handshake, this is what happens:
ClientHello
ServerHello
Server sends public certificate
Client matches the public certificate with the one on the trust store
Server sends the Certificate request
With the certificate request the server sends a list of valid CAs, on this list only the my root CA is sent (among a long list of other well known CAs.).
Client certificate is null.
Server receives a null certificate from the client, thus closes the connection.
And that is it, the client won't send a valid certificate back to the server. I have some questions on this:
Has anybody experienced something like this?
Regarding that list of CAs sent by the server (Windows), How does .net determine what to send to the client? Is there a way to modify that list?
Do I need to send the all the authorities in the chain used to sign my certificate in that list of CAs? or is the Root one enough?
Am I missing something on either side of my code?
Any help will be greatly appreciated it.
In
The following two statements are useless on the client side (although they shouldn't hurt):
socket.setNeedClientAuth(true);
socket.setWantClientAuth(true);
The fact that you see the Certificate Request message and the Client Certificate message shows that the server is configured properly.
The most likely cause that comes to mind for the absence of certificate in the client certificate message is that the keystore (on the client side) might not be configured properly. You may be interested in this answer to make sure that your client key store is configured properly. More specifically, you need to make sure that the private key for your client certificate was imported in the same alias as the certificate chain (and that it's the chain going back to a CA advertised in the Certificate Request message).
(Regarding the rest of your question, I'm not sure how to modify the CA list sent by the server when using SslStream in C#. This earlier question would seem to suggest there is no solution, although newer versions of .Net may have addresses the issue since this question was asked. I haven't been able to find anything that would do it by looking at the SslStream API documentation and related classes, but this doesn't mean it doesn't exist.)
I need to connect to a provider's web service with a Windows Form application. He gives me a certificate to access it but I have a security problem.
I have done these following steps :
Add certificate to personal store (on IE & Firefox)
Generate a proxy with the remote wsdl (no problem)
Use this code to call a method :
`using (service1.MessagesService m = new service1.MessagesService())
{
X509Certificate crt = new X509Certificate(#"C:\OpenSSL\bin\thecert.p12",string.Empty);
m.ClientCertificates.Add(crt);
var result = m.AuthoriseTransaction(aut);
this.textBox1.AppendText(result.id.ToString());
}`
I have the following error :
The underlying connection was closed: Could not establish trust relationship for the channel SSL / TLS.
Thanks for your help
Your connection isn't being authorised correctly, is the webservice over https? You may need to create a custom implementation of CertificatePolicy. See this article for an example.