Develop Reference

Generate C# wrapper from C include file

Suppose I have a dll written in pure C. I have an inculde file (.h) so I can use the dll from a VS 2012 C project.
Is there any way to generate a C# wrapper class based on the metainfo in the include file, or I must write all the [DllImport]... manually? The C source code for dll is also available.
(Please note: This is not a COM library)
Thanks in advance

There are tools that can help, but by and large you have to write the wrapper code yourself to some degree. The main reason being that a C header file does not fully specify the interface. For instance, consider this function:
void foo(int* x);
Does this function receive a pointer to a single int, or does it receive a pointer to an array? There's no way for you to tell with just this information. So, any tool that creates wrappers must also use some form of annotation to fully describe the semantics of the functions. If those annotations are not present you would need to create them. At which point it probably becomes quicker and easier to write the wrapper manually.
As an alternative to writing C# pinvokes you can use a mixed mode C++/CLI assembly. This can include the header file and link against the import library. Then all you need to do is write a C++/CLI ref class to wrap the interface, and add the C++/CLI assembly as a reference to your C# project.

C# code can't "see" the methods in my C++ dll

I have a code written in C++ (that I did not write) and want to use it in C#, so I decided to make a dll and use this class from there.
I have very little knowledge of C++ and am having problems referencing the methods of this class in my C# project.
The C++ code is like this:
#ifndef BeamAn_class
#define BeamAn_class
#define DllExport __declspec( dllexport )
#include <vector>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
public class DllExport BeamAn
{
public:
BeamAn();
~BeamAn();
bool SetGeometry(vector<double>); //I didn't put the DllExport here because I already did it for the whole class. It's okay to do this, right?
//other public methods an stuff
private:
//private methods an stuff
}
#endif
In my C# project I added the reference to the C++ dll normally (right click on the project, add reference. The .lib and .h files are in the same folder of the dll).
But looks like Visual Studio can't "see" the methods of my class. I can create a object of the BeamAn type, but can't use any of its methods.
For example, I can do this:
BeamAn contBeam = new BeamAn();
But can't use any of the methods or atributes inside the class, like this: contBeam.SetLoadFactors(1.0,1.2);
Visual Studio says that "BeamAn does not contain a definition for 'SetLoadFactors' and no extension method 'SetLoadFactors' accepting a first argument type 'BeamAn' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
Is there more something I should write in the C++ code to make the dll work properly, or am I doing something wrong when referencing it? I know that I'd have to use "DllImport" in my C# code if I was explicit linking, but that's not what I want to do.
Thank you very much!

There are several ways to make C++ library available in C#.
Use PInvoke - directly call your C++ code. See this article for more information. Also see pinvoke.net for general reference.
Use an interop language to create a managed wrapper around your unmanaged code. If you're in the Microsoft world I would recommend C++/CLI to create mixed mode libraries (dlls that contain both managed and unmanaged code). Here is a brief (and old) article introducing C++/CLI.
Make your C++ COM accessible. Since the code isn't yours this one might not be useful to you. See this post for more information about C++ and COM.
For simple scenarios PInvoke is probably the easiest. For more complicated interactions of the managed and unmanaged code I would recommend writing a mixed mode dll with an interop language. And if those don't work for you, use COM.
To address the error you receive: you can't add a reference to a C++ library from a C# project - they are completely different languages with different memory management systems, different type systems, different everything (well, a lot of things). Also, you can't pass data structures (like vectors, maps or sets) from unmanaged code to managed code.

to use c++ code in a c# project, you have 2 options:
wrap your c++ class in a managed c++ class
use a library called swig
a link that might interest you: Wrapping Visual C++ in C#

How can I call a function of a C++ DLL that accepts a parameter of type stringstream from C#?

I want to import an unmanaged C++ DLL and call a function that takes stringstream as a parameter. In C#, there is no stringstream class, so can anyone tell me how to call such a function from a C# program?

You should not expose templated objects via a DLL, period.
Templated objects (e.g. almost everything in std::) become inlined. So in this way, your DLL gets its own private copy of the implementation. The module calling your DLL will also get its own private implementation of stringstream. Passing between them means you are inadvertently weaving two unrelated implementations together. For many projects, if you are using the exact same build settings, it's probably no problem.
But even if you use the same compiler, and mix a release DLL with a debug EXE, you will find stack / heap corruption and other harder-to-find problems.
And that's only using your DLL from another unmanaged C++ exe/dll. Crossing then the lines to .NET is even more of a problem.
The solution is to change your DLL's interface to something that plays friendly across DLL bounds. Either COM (you could use IStream for example), or just a C-style interface like the winapi.

If you can modify the C++ dll, export a plain string version. Otherwise you have to build a managed C++ wrapper project, import the other C++ dll, export it as a managed function, and call that from your C# code. C++ interop really sucks.

I'm afraid that you're going to have to create your own StringStream class in C# in order to be able to consume the functions exported from that DLL. As you mentioned, the .NET Framework doesn't provide any similar class out of the box.
The easiest way is probably to wrap the StringBuilder class provided by the .NET Framework such that it can function as a stream. See this blog post for a further explanation and some sample code.
A similar question was also answered in MSDN Magazine: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163768.aspx. You might find some of the hints and/or sample code given there useful.

You are trying to bind native C++ code to managed code in C#. Best way of doing that in general is to introduce middle layer in managed C++ that will provide interface to calls from C#.

Create an Wrapper dll in c, or c++ that exposes an friendly call to that function. It's the better way.
for example an
BOOL getString(TCHAR * myreturnString, DWORD *size);

Using a C++ dll in C#

I'm attempting to consume a dll written in C++ from a C# application. I have 3rd party source code for the C++ dll (the Cyclone physics engine) and do not want to manually port it over to C#.
In the C++ project
I changed it to output a dll. I changed it to use the /clr flag. I changed it to use Multi-threaded Debug DLL (/MDd) because that was the only one compatible with /clr and also compiled.
In the C# project
I added a reference to the dll. I'm using the cyclone namespace.
At first there was absolutely nothing under the namespace. I think this is because in the C++ code, all classes were declared with no access modifiers and the default is private. So for the class "Particle" I changed the definition to:
public class Particle
{
//...
}
Now I can successfully declare a variable of type Particle from the C# code. However, intellesense and the object browser report Particle to be a struct (?) and it doesn't contain any methods at all. The c++ code declares a bunch of methods after "public:" access modifiers so I don't know what the problem is.
For example,
public:
void integrate(real duration);
What am I doing wrong?

The Particle class is not a managed class, hence it is treated as a struct. You need to use the ref keyword to make it managed and garbage collected. You also need to do the same to every other class that references it which might be a problem. The best solution I think, is to create a managed wrapper class that uses the Particle class internally. This wrapper class can then be referenced by .net.
See here:

I have not actually run into your exact problem before, but I have used C++ dlls in c# before. Typically when calling a dll like that you would use the dllImport keyword. Basically you can define a class that imports all the types and methods from the c++ dll. You can then call those wrapper classes.
I am far from an expert on it, but I have used it to get access to win32 methods and some other libraries that I needed to use.
This link on codeplex has a few links tools that might help. But the most important is probably the Interop Assistant. It can generate the C# wrappers for your c++ dll.
This isn't exactly what you are asking, but I thought it might help to look at a different direction.

Try declaring the c++ class with the ref keyword:
public ref class Particle

Do you have a reference to COM Interop?

How to create a .dll in Visual Studio 2008 for use in a C# App?

I have a C++ class I'd like to access from a C# application. I'll need to access the constructor and a single member function. Currently the app accepts data in the form of stl::vectors but I can do some conversion if that's not likely to work?
I've found a few articles online which describe how to call C++ DLLs and some others which describe how to make .dll projects for other purposes. I'm struggling to find a guide to creating them in Visual Studio 2008 for use in a C# app though (there seem to be a few for VS 6.0 but the majority of the options they specify don't seem to appear in the 2008 version).
If anyone has a step-by-step guide or a fairly basic example to get going from, I'd be very grateful.

The easiest way to interoperate between C++ and C# is by using managed C++, or C++/CLI as it is called. In VisualStudio, create a new C++ project of type "CLR Class Library". There is some new syntax for the parts that you want to make available to C#, but you can use regular C++ as usual.
In this example, I'm using std::vector<int> just to show that you can use standard types - however, in an actual application, I'd prefer to use the .NET types where possible (in this case a System::Collections::Generic::List<int>).
#pragma unmanaged
#include <vector>
#pragma managed
public ref class CppClass
{
public:
CppClass() : vectorOfInts_(new std::vector<int>)
{}
// This is a finalizer, run when GC collects the managed object
!CppClass()
{ delete vectorOfInts_; }
void Add(int n)
{ vectorOfInts_->push_back(n); }
private:
std::vector<int>* vectorOfInts_;
};
EDIT: Changed the class to hold the vector by pointer instead of by value.

If such DLL is unmanaged. You will have to use P/invoke. A p/invoke function definition looks like this:
[DllImport("Library_Name.dll", EntryPoint = "function")]
public static extern void function();
If, on the other hand, is a managed (C++/CLI) DLL (or assembly). You can access it by adding a reference to it on your .NET project.
EDIT:
I think I didn't answer your question at all. But to create a managed C++ DLL to be accessed from .NET, create a new project an choose:
Visual C++/CLR/Class Library. And then, just add its output DLL to your C# project.
That'd do it. :)

Do you have an existing C++ exe that you want to re-build as a dll? Or is all you have the C++ class?
If all you have is the C++ class, you might think about building a .Net dll. While you couldn't pass stl types from C# to C++, I am pretty sure you can pass managed .Net types.
If you must use the stl types in the class, you could convert the data in the C++ class, or the calling app.

I've found a tutorial which works. A quick note though, you have to be careful to copy the .dll into the same directory as the executable. I messed around with trying to tell the executable where the DLL was but gave up in the end.

Use of unmanaged C++ Dlls can be very tedious in C#.
An "easier" route is to place it in a COM wrapper.