How to process multiple where clauses in a LINQ statement? - c#

Thanks to those who answered my last question I got the code below to work which allows the developer to send multiple where clauses to a method which includes each of them in a LINQ statement. However, how can I get the inclusion of the where clauses to be dynamic? Instead of this:
return customers
.Where(whereClauses[0])
.Where(whereClauses[1])
.ToList();
something like this (pseudo-code):
List<Customer> customers = new List<Customer>();
foreach (var whereClause in whereClauses)
{
customers
.Where(whereClause...???)
.ToList();
}
return customers;
Here is the code that works:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
namespace TestDynamicLinq2343
{
public class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
List<Customer> customers = Customer.GetCustomers();
List<Func<Customer, bool>> whereClauses = new List<Func<Customer, bool>>();
whereClauses.Add(c => c.LastName.ToUpper().Contains("A"));
whereClauses.Add(c => c.FirstName.ToUpper().Contains("J"));
foreach (var customer in Customer.GetFilteredCustomers(customers, whereClauses))
{
Console.WriteLine(customer.LastName);
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
public class Customer
{
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public string Street { get; set; }
public string Location { get; set; }
public string ZipCode { get; set; }
public static List<Customer> GetCustomers()
{
List<Customer> customers = new List<Customer>();
customers.Add(new Customer { FirstName = "Jim", LastName = "Jones" });
customers.Add(new Customer { FirstName = "Joe", LastName = "Adams" });
customers.Add(new Customer { FirstName = "Jake", LastName = "Johnson" });
customers.Add(new Customer { FirstName = "Angie", LastName = "Reckar" });
customers.Add(new Customer { FirstName = "Jean", LastName = "Anderson" });
return customers;
}
public static List<Customer> GetFilteredCustomers(List<Customer> customers, List<Func<Customer, bool>> whereClauses)
{
return customers
.Where(whereClauses[0])
.Where(whereClauses[1])
.ToList();
}
}
}

IEnumerable<Customer> dbCustomers = customers;
foreach (var whereClause in whereClauses)
{
dbCustomers = dbCustomers.Where(whereClause);
}
return dbCustomers.ToList();
maybe interesting extensionMethod:
public static class IEnumerableExtension
{
public static void AttachWhereClauses<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, IEnumerable<Func<T, bool>> whereClauses)
{
foreach (var whereClause in whereClauses)
{
source = source.Where(whereClause);
}
}
}
var listedCustomers = customers.AttachWhereClauses(whereClauses).ToList();
but: not tested - i do not know for sure, if attaching the whereClauses to the same object works!

Something like this:
public IEnumerable<Customer> ApplyConditions(IEnumerable<Func<Customer, bool>> conditions)
{
IEnumerable<Customer> customers = ...;
foreach(var condition in conditions)
customers = customers.Where(condition);
return customers;
}

Related

How to access a property of a class by its name?

I find it hard to clearly describe the case in a one-sentence title. Here is the example:
public class Person
{
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string MiddleName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
}
public enum PersonProperties
{
FirstName = 1,
MiddleName = 2,
LastName = 3
}
I am hoping to do this:
foreach (var p in Persons) {
var nameCollection=new List<string>();
foreach (var s in (SectionsEnum[]) Enum.GetValues(typeof (SectionsEnum)))
{
nameCollection.Add(p.GetPropertyByName(s);
}
}
Now, how can we implement the GetPropertyByName() part?
You could do this directly using reflection:
public string GetPropertyByName(SectionsEnum s)
{
var property = typeof(Person).GetProperty(s.ToString());
return (string)property.GetValue(this);
}
Or maybe with a switch.
public string GetPropertyByName(SectionsEnum s)
{
switch (s)
{
case SectionsEnum.FirstName:
return this.FirstName;
case SectionsEnum.MiddleName:
return this.MiddleName;
case SectionsEnum.LastName:
return this.LastName;
default:
throw new Exception();
}
}
But I'd ask if you wouldn't be better served by a wholly different approach, e.g. a list:
public IList<string> NameProperties
{
get
{
return new[] { FirstName, MiddleName, LastName };
}
}
Or instead of having SectionsEnum, use Funcs:
//was
SectionsEnum s = SectionsEnum.FirstName;
//instead
Func<Person, string> nameFunc = p => p.FirstName;
string name = nameFunc(myPerson);
this should be a good starting point for you
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Person p = new Person() { FirstName ="a", MiddleName = "b", LastName = "c" };
List<string> result = new List<string>();
string[] enums = Enum.GetNames(typeof(PersonProperties));
foreach(string e in enums)
{
result.Add(p.GetType().GetProperty(e).GetValue(p, null).ToString());
}
int i = 0;
foreach (string e in enums)
{
Console.WriteLine(string.Format("{0} : {1}", e, result[i++]));
}
Console.ReadKey(false);
}
}
public class Person
{
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string MiddleName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
}
public enum PersonProperties
{
FirstName = 1,
MiddleName = 2,
LastName = 3
}
}

LINQ selectors inheritance

It's not impossible that my question has already been answered here, but unfortunately when it comes to LINQ I can't always find the right search terms.
Given the underlying source code how do you think I can reuse Selectors.CustomerDTO selector within Selectors.CustomerExtendedDTO?
It should be possible since the input database entity is the same.
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
using (NorthwindEntities ctx = new NorthwindEntities())
{
foreach (var item in ctx.Customers.Where(c => c.CompanyName.StartsWith("A")).Select(Selectors.CustomerDTO))
{
Console.WriteLine("CompanyName: {0}", item.CompanyName);
Console.WriteLine();
}
foreach (var item in ctx.Customers.Where(c => c.CompanyName.StartsWith("A")).Select(Selectors.CustomerExtendedDTO))
{
Console.WriteLine("CompanyName: {0}", item.CompanyName);
Console.WriteLine("ContactName: {0}", item.ContactName);
Console.WriteLine();
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
class CustomerDTO
{
public string CustomerID { get; set; }
public string CompanyName { get; set; }
}
class CustomerExtendedDTO : CustomerDTO
{
public string ContactName { get; set; }
public string Address { get; set; }
}
static class Selectors
{
internal static Expression<Func<Customers, CustomerDTO>> CustomerDTO
{
get
{
return c => new CustomerDTO
{
CustomerID = c.CustomerID,
CompanyName = c.CompanyName
};
}
}
internal static Expression<Func<Customers, CustomerExtendedDTO>> CustomerExtendedDTO
{
get
{
return c => new CustomerExtendedDTO
{
CustomerID = c.CustomerID,
CompanyName = c.CompanyName,
Address = c.Address,
ContactName = c.ContactName
};
}
}
}
Such thing would be very useful when the inherited projection entity does not only contain two properties but several dozens.
Thanks for any ideas.

Delete method in WCF

I'm looking for a LINQ delete method for this:
<ArrayOfGroup>
<Group>
<GroupName>c</GroupName>
<StudentList>
<Student>
<TimeAdded>0001-01-01T00:00:00</TimeAdded> // trying to delete from here
<StudentID>1</StudentID>
<FirstName>a</FirstName>
<LastName>b</LastName> // to here
<StudentGroup/>
</Student>
</StudentList>
</Group>
</ArrayOfGroup>
For some reason when I delete it this way:
[ServiceBehavior(InstanceContextMode = InstanceContextMode.Single)]
public class Service : IService
{
List<Student> students = new List<Student>();
List<Group> Groups = new List<Group>();
public void removeStudent(string studentID)
{
students.Remove(students.Find(f => f.StudentID.Equals(studentID)));
//var result = students.Where(n => String.Equals(n.StudentID, studentID)).FirstOrDefault();
//if (result == null)
//{
// result.StudentGroup.Remove(StudentList.Student.Find(f => f.StudentID.Equals(studentID)));
//}
// students.RemoveAll(f => f.StudentID.Equals(studentID)); also tryed this
}
It doesn't remove it from the Student List/ student area of my ArrayOfGroup, so I am fed up trying to solve why it isn't deleting and just trying to find a new way to delete it along with the original records. I feel like a criminal for doing this but if anyone can help would be much appreciated.
My Data Contracts looks like this:
[DataContract(Name="Student")]
public class Student
{
public Student()
{
StudentGroup = new List<Group>();
}
[DataMember(Name = "StudentID")]
public string StudentID { get; set; }
[DataMember(Name = "FirstName")]
public string FirstName { get; set; }
[DataMember(Name = "LastName")]
public string LastName { get; set; }
[DataMember(Name = "TimeAdded")]
public DateTime TimeAdded;
public string TimeAddedString
{
get
{
return this.TimeAdded.ToString("dd/MM/yyyy hh:mm:ss");
}
}
public List<Group> StudentGroup { get; set; }
}
[DataContract(Name = "Group")]
public class Group
{
public Group()
{
StudentList = new List<Student>();
}
[DataMember(Name = "GroupName")]
public string GroupName { get; set; }
public List<Student> StudentList { get; set; }
}
This is how a student is added to a group if it helps?
public void AddStudentToGroup(string group, string studentID, string firstName, string lastName)
{
var result = Groups.Where(n => String.Equals(n.GroupName, group)).FirstOrDefault();
var result1 = students.Where(n => String.Equals(n.StudentID, studentID)).FirstOrDefault();
if (result != null)
{
result.StudentList.Add(new Student() { StudentID = studentID, FirstName = firstName, LastName = lastName });
}
if (result1 != null)
{
result1.StudentGroup.Add(new Group() { GroupName = group });
}
}
You can use the Remove method on the List<T> object which takes a predicate like so:
students.RemoveAll(s => s.StudentId == 5);

Linq to objects filtering IN and not in

Looking for an example where I can filter my collection based on some filtering criteria.
I have been looking for some example where given a list /array i can filter a collection.
In the example below in my find method I am trying to filter based on 2 values ,looking for something like an "IN" function any suggestions?
class Program
{
static void Main()
{
//Print all customres that belong to below deparments and match on surname
var criteria=new Criteria
{
Departments = new List<string> {"BusinessAnalyst", "Account"},
Surname = "Bloggs"
};
List<Customer> customers = Repository.Find(criteria);
customers.ForEach(x => Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Surname: {0} Department :{1}", x.Surname,x.Department)));
Console.Read();
}
}
public class Repository
{
public static List<Customer>GetCustomers()
{
return new List<Customer>
{
new Customer { Name = "Jon",Surname="Smith",Department = DepartmentType.Managers},
new Customer{Name = "Bill",Surname = "Gates",Department = DepartmentType.Managers},
new Customer { Name = "Mary",Surname = "Bug",Department = DepartmentType.Developers},
new Customer { Name = "Mark",Surname="Boo",Department = DepartmentType.Account},
new Customer{Name = "Ron",Surname = "Scott",Department = DepartmentType.Managers},
new Customer { Name = "Jonny",Surname = "Dip",Department = DepartmentType.Developers},
new Customer { Name = "Mary",Surname = "Bloggs",Department = DepartmentType.BusinessAnalyst},
new Customer { Name = "Mary",Surname = "Bug",Department = DepartmentType.Account},
new Customer { Name = "Jonny",Surname = "Dip",Department = DepartmentType.Account},
new Customer { Name = "Mary",Surname = "Bloggs",Department = DepartmentType.Managers}
};
}
public static List<Customer> Find(Criteria criteria)
{
List<Customer>customers=Repository.GetCustomers();
//Filter on departments
//ERROR HERE AS I cannot do this "IN" would be fantastic.
customers = customers.Contains(criteria.Departments);
//now filter on name
customers = customers.Where(x => x.Surname == criteria.Surname).ToList();
return customers;
}
}
public enum DepartmentType
{
Account,
Managers,
Developers,
BusinessAnalyst
}
public class Customer
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Surname { get; set; }
public DepartmentType Department { get; set; }
}
public class Criteria
{
public Criteria()
{
Departments=new List<string>();
}
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Surname { get; set; }
public List<string> Departments { get; set; }
}
public static List<Customer> Find(Criteria criteria)
{
List<Customer> customers = Repository.GetCustomers();
var customers2 = customers.Where(x => criteria.Departments.Contains(x.Department.ToString()));
var customers3 = customers2.Where(x => x.Surname == criteria.Surname);
return customers3.ToList();
}
But considering you use an enum for the Department (DepartmentType), shouldn't your Criteria class use the same instead of a string?
If you define the criteria.Departments as List<DepartmentType> then you can write
public static List<Customer> Find(Criteria criteria)
{
List<Customer> customers = Repository.GetCustomers();
var customers2 = customers.Where(x => criteria.Departments.Contains(x.Department));
var customers3 = customers2.Where(x => x.Surname == criteria.Surname);
return customers3.ToList();
}
Contains returns a bool defining whether a specified object is contained in a collection. Based on your example, you will need to use Where to filter the customers, then use Contains on the departments:
customers = customers.Where(c => criteria.Departments.Contains(c.Department));
i think you want something like this..
customers = customers.Where(c => criteria.Departments.Contains(c.Department));
You want
Customers.Where(c => criteria.Departments.Contains(c.Department.ToString()))
Not sure if this is what you're looking for but the following:
List<Customer> FilteredCustomers = (from c in customers where Criteria.Departments.Contains(c.deparment) && c.surname == Criteria.Surname select c).ToList();
Would equate to something like this in SQL:
SELECT *
FROM Customers
WHERE Department IN (
List of departments
)
AND Surname = surname
I haven't tested this but I think it should work and bring back what you want.

How can I send where statements to a method which are dynamically executed in a LINQ statement?

In the following example, GetFilteredCustomers() works fine so I can send various letters which I want customers to have in their last name.
But how can I build GetFilteredCustomersDynamic() which will enable me to send a full where clause that can be dynamically included in the LINQ statement?
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
namespace TestDynamicLinq2343
{
public class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
List<Customer> customers = Customer.GetCustomers();
//semi-dynamic
foreach (var customer in Customer.GetFilteredCustomers(customers, "o"))
{
Console.WriteLine(customer.LastName);
}
//fully-dyanmic (can send where clauses)
foreach (var customer in Customer.GetFilteredCustomersDynamic(customers, c => c.FirstName.Contains("a")))
{
Console.WriteLine(customer.LastName);
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
public class Customer
{
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public string Street { get; set; }
public string Location { get; set; }
public string ZipCode { get; set; }
public static List<Customer> GetCustomers()
{
List<Customer> customers = new List<Customer>();
customers.Add(new Customer { FirstName = "Jim", LastName = "Jones" });
customers.Add(new Customer { FirstName = "Joe", LastName = "Adams" });
customers.Add(new Customer { FirstName = "Jake", LastName = "Johnson" });
return customers;
}
public static List<Customer> GetFilteredCustomers(List<Customer> customers, string letter)
{
return (from c in customers
where c.LastName.Contains(letter)
select c).ToList();
}
public static List<Customer> GetFilteredCustomersDynamic(List<Customer> customers, Func<..., bool> whereClause)
{
return (from c in customers
where ...whereClause...
select c).ToList();
}
}
}
Answer:
thanks elder_george and arjuns, I got this example to work like this (albeit without the Expression<> ):
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
namespace TestDynamicLinq2343
{
public class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
List<Customer> customers = Customer.GetCustomers();
Func<Customer, bool> whereClause = c => c.LastName.Contains("a") && c.FirstName.Contains("J");
foreach (var customer in Customer.GetFilteredCustomers(customers, whereClause))
{
Console.WriteLine(customer.LastName);
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
public class Customer
{
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public string Street { get; set; }
public string Location { get; set; }
public string ZipCode { get; set; }
public static List<Customer> GetCustomers()
{
List<Customer> customers = new List<Customer>();
customers.Add(new Customer { FirstName = "Jim", LastName = "Jones" });
customers.Add(new Customer { FirstName = "Joe", LastName = "Adams" });
customers.Add(new Customer { FirstName = "Jake", LastName = "Johnson" });
customers.Add(new Customer { FirstName = "Angie", LastName = "Reckar" });
customers.Add(new Customer { FirstName = "Jean-Luc", LastName = "Beaudoir" });
return customers;
}
public static List<Customer> GetFilteredCustomers(List<Customer> customers, Func<Customer, bool> whereClause)
{
return customers
.Where(whereClause).ToList();
}
}
}
You'd need to represent filter as Expression<Func<Customer, bool>>, not as Func<Customer, bool>. This way you can use Queryable.Where method to add this filter to LINQ expression tree.
EDIT: I was wrong, as this code uses LINQ to objects, where delegates are proper filter criteria. My bad.
E.g. (corrected to using normal delegates):
public static List<Customer> GetFilteredCustomersDynamic(List<Customer> customers, Func<Customer, bool> whereClause)
{
return customers
.Where(whereClause).ToList();
}
public static List<Customer> GetFilteredCustomers(List<Customer> customers, string letter)
{
return GetFilteredCustomersDynamic(c => c.LastName.Contains(letter));
}
Try this code,
public static List<Customer> GetFilteredCustomersDynamic(List<Customer> customers, Expression<Func<Customer, bool>> whereClause)
{
return customers.Where(whereClause.Compile()).ToList();
}
#elder_george,
there is a typo, expression should be compiled to get it's delegate otherwise this can no compile.
return customers
.Where(whereClause).ToList();
should be read as
return customers
.Where(whereClause.Compile()).ToList();

Categories

Resources