Develop Reference

What is the best way to publish multiple versions of the same ClickOnce application?

I have a c# ClickOnce application that I need to be able to publish multiple times for OEM purposes.
The way I understand it now is that publish settings are located in the .csproj file.
However, this is inconvenient in the case where I want to publish multiple versions.
for example, Company A needs totally different icons, start menu location, product name etc. from Company B, but the assemblies need not be renamed.
Here are a couple approaches/questions that I can think of to solve this issue...
1.Is there a way to create a separate publish settings file to use during build time?
2.Can I edit specific publish settings (like Start Menu location, etc) at build time with MSBuild.exe? I think this would be ideal...
e.g.
MSBuild.exe project.sln /target:Publish /property:edit-project-publish-settings-here
3.Maybe create a 2nd .csproj file? (Would prefer not to do this...)
Please share your thoughts as to the best approach, or any other clever ways to make this happen. Thanks!

I wish I could give you some brilliant solution, but personally I would probably go with option 3.
I mean, its pretty simple, the changes should be pretty static and it will be difficult(ish) to totally screw it up and deploy the wrong changes to the wrong company.

If you copy the .csproj in your project folder, it will reference all of the same source files and you can just change the executable name. Create another VS solution and you can reference the copied .csproj and get rid of your first one so that you can publish two separate versions.
This isn't ideal for ClickOnce however.
If you use a Singleton object that specifies the "mode" (Company A, B, C, etc.) you can easily store that in the app.config (or another xml file). Then just re-publish your ClickOnce Application but copy the correct version of your configuration file in so it gets shipped with the build. This way, you don't need any additional csprojects Just include all of your icons and set them at run-time on App Start based on your Singleton object.

I found that you are able to edit certain properties using MSBuild.exe like this
MSBuild Solution.sln /target:publish /property:ProductName=ProductA\;Publisher=CompanyA\;ApplicationIcon=companyA.ico
I found another useful post on modifying.csproj files programatically with .NET code. (This would only be needed if you're modifying things that are deeper than just the project properties specified in the ClickOnce documentation below)
The MSBuild documentation here was also useful -- especially under Publishing Properties

Good practice for working with multiple solutions in Visual C# Express

Background: My team is made up of 3 fairly inexperienced developers. We are developing in-house software for our company. Currently we have a number of smaller and separate solutions. Many of these are interdependent. Currently these depencies are made by referencing the output dll's in the respective release-folder. Updates are pushed around by manually rebuilding dependent solutions.
Example:
Solution A uses features of solution B. The connection is made having Solution A referencing ...\Release\B.dll . Changes to B propagates by building solution B, then building solution A and so forth.
This has worked okay before, but now we are moving from a manual (mind numbing) "version control system" (folder1, folder2, folder2New...) to using a proper one (git).
It seems that versioning the .dll's is not recommended. This means that every time someone wants to build a new version of A, he also needs to build B (and maybe 5 other solutions) in order to have the latest version of B.
I'm thinking that there must be a better way to do this.
I've been looking at combining the relevant solutions into one master solution, but I can't figure out how to do this in Visual C# Express (which we are using).
So at long last the questions:
Is having a master solution that builds everything the way to go?
-- it seems so from MSDN but I can't figure out how to do this in Visual C# Express 2008, which leeds me to
Is this even possible in Visual C# Express? If not, what is a
good way of managing the problem?
Edit Thanks to all for the great suggestions below. Here's a summary of what I ended up doing.
In short the answers to the questions are: "Yes" and "Sort of, but mostly yes". I implemented as follows: In order to get an idea of the dependencies, I did as suggested below, and drew a map of the binary products, with an arrow pointing from the dll's or exe's name to all of its dependencies.
For each project, I opened its corresponding solution (since at first there was one solution pr project). I then added the projectfile of each dependency in the tree structure revealed in the graph (by right-clicking the solution in solution explorer), so that also dependecies's dependencies and so forth were included. Then I removed the old references (pointing directly to the .dlls) and added references to the projects instead.
The important result is:
When a solution of a project is built, all it's dependencies are built with it, so that when deploying, you know that all the build products are automatically of the latest version.

I would create a new solution and add all of the projects that relate to each other to it. You can group the projects from each of the original solutions by putting them in different solution folders within the new solution. This way, when you build a project, all of the projects it depends upon will also get built. It also means that all of your projects will be built using the same configuration (i.e. Release or Debug). This means that all of your projects can be built in Debug, not just the top one in the dependency tree while everything below it is a Release assembly. Makes debugging much easier.

I have Visual C# Express 2010 and when I create a new project, it automatically creates a default solution. If it's visible, then you can right-click on the solution and choose Add>Existing Project.
If the solution is not visible, (I seem to remember this problem in C# Express 2005/8), then you can add an existing project via File>Add>Existing Project. The solution should be visible now.
In terms of speration, what I usually do is this:
Everything that must be built together should be in one solution, and these should be projects and not DLL's. I try to live by The Joel List, where you should be able to build your project in one step. If it is one deployable unit, then there should be one solution. All of my projects are built on a build server before they can be deployed, so everything should be in the solution that needs to be built.
Guys sometimes put the WCF services project and the clients in the same project for easy debugging, but it depends on whether you want to deploy client and server independently. Usually for bigger projects I separate them.
Lastly there's one exception. We have a central common library that is used by different teams. If it's included in different solutions, and one team changes something, we end up breaking the other team's builds. In this case, we create a single solution that has all of the library projects. These get built to DLL's that we store the versions of. We treat these as a framework that the other solutions can use. E.g. Team A is using CommonLibrary 1.1 and Team B is using CommonLibrary 1.2.

You need to think of Solutions as just "groupings of projects" - the projects are what are actually "built", not the "solution" (well, that's not entirely true, the solution is turned into a "metaproject" that references the contained projects, but its close enough to the truth)
If you have interdependencies between solutions, I would suggest drawing all the projects on a big whiteboard, then draw arrows representing the dependencies from project to project. Once you've done this, you'll be able to see at a glance what the appropriate "groupings of projects" make sense. Those become your solution files.
For example, if you have projects A, B, ..., F, where:
A depends on B
B depends on C
D depends on C
E depends on F
One possible split here would be solution 1 with projects A, B, C, D and solution 2 with projects E, F.

I would come up with a common area to push all dlls. My company uses the "R" drive, which is just a LOCAL (not network so no one can touch another persons folder) mapped folder everyone has. Each solution will build to this. Right click a project, properties->build and change the output. Or you can add a post build command to push the dll there. After that, have all of your projects reference this location.
Once this is done and everything is pointing at the same place, you can even add different combinations of projects to different solutions. If a developer only wants the ui projects, they can open a special "ui" solution that is a subset of the whole.
Here is a post build event that I use in my project properties->build events
rem when building on local workstation copy dll to local R:\
if '$(BuildingInsideVisualStudio)' (
xcopy $(TargetDir)$(TargetName).* R:\Extranet\$(TargetName)\1.0\ /Y
)
rem if "Enterprise" build then copy dll to Corp R:\ drive and to Build Machine R:\
if '$(Reason)' == 'Manual' (
xcopy $(TargetDir)$(TargetName).* \\folder\$(TargetName)\1.0\ /Y
xcopy $(TargetDir)$(TargetName).* R:\Extranet\$(TargetName)\1.0\ /Y
)

Whats a good approach for white labeling dll

Whats a good approach for white labeling dll and exe with visual studio?
In essence we want to be able to have the name of the dll and exe change based on the client that we are packaging the solution for, e.g.:
Instead of myCompany.exe and myCompany.db.dll, I would like yourComany.exe and yourComany.db.dll or acme.exe and acme.db.dll, etc
Edit:
Currently we are using a straight visual studio build process with a wix project to create an msi.

If the only justification for rebuilding it is to change the name, can you just use something generic in the first place? Imagine having to patch 50 identical DLLs, and build/deploying each one separately because they all must be named different things. Even if it's only for a few clients, I would hate to have to maintain that. Versioning could be a hassle too.
If you must do it, I would probably go with a build task (which can perform fairly advanced operations). You mention that you are "packaged the solution"; the viability of a build task would depend on how it is being packaged.
In response to your comment about naming the EXEs with client-specific names... My obvious suggestion there would be to have those applications contain as little code as possible.
The simplest build integration I can think of would be to create a post-build task which ran upon successful compilation in release mode. The task could then read a config file which defined the unique names, and copy the successfully built EXEs to an output directory.
Some of the operations can be accomplished just from the task config file: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms171466.
Alternatively, you might want to create a little application to do all the work for you, and just pass config switches to it.
For example, here is a little post-build command that I execute to minify my JavaScript/CSS upon successful build of a web application. The concept is similar:
build
execute an app (like msbuild.exe, or your custom build app)
pass data to the executable (like paths, switches, etc.)
executable writes the files out
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v4.0.30319\msbuild.exe
"$(ProjectDir)Properties\build\minify.xml"
/p:SourceLocation="$(ProjectDir)client"
/p:CssOutputFile="$(ProjectDir)client\final\final-full.css"
/p:JavaScriptOutputDirectory="$(ProjectDir)client\final"

You could use ILMerge in whatever post-build process you want on all your outputted assemblies (dll and exe), to create one-off customer-branded builds.
ilmerge /out:CustomerName.exe internalName.dll internalName.exe

I don't know that there is a good way to do this without actually building the project as XYZ company. You could try something like this which will give you the desired result BUT it will change the physical name of the assembly as well which may cause dependency problems.

Visual Studio Long wait before Starting to build

We have a moderately sized solution, with about 20 projects. In one of them I have my business entities. On compiling any project, visual studio waits and hangs about one and a half minutes on this BusinessEntities project.
I tried our solution in SharpDevelop and it compiles our complete solution, in 18 seconds. Similar timing with MSBuild.
My guess is that VS is trying to find out if the project needs a compile, but this process is about 15 times slower than actually performing the compile!!
I can't switch to the great sharpdevelop, it lacks some small, but essential requirements for our debugging scenarios.
Can I prevent VS from checking this project, And have it compile the projects without such a check, just like sharpdevelop?
I already know about unchecking projects in configuration management to prevent building some projects, but my developers will forget they need to compile this project after updating to latest sources and they face problems that seem strange to them.
Edit: Interesting results of an investigation: The delay happens to one of the projects only. In configuration manager I unchecked all projects, then compiled each of them individually. All projects compile in a few seconds!! The point is this: if that special project is built directly, compiles in a few seconds, if it is being built (or skipped, because it is up-to-date) as a result of building another project that depends on it, VS hangs for about a minute and half, and then decides to compile it (or skip it). My conclusion: Visual studio is checking to know if any files are changed, but for some reasons, for this special project it is extremely inefficient!!

I'd go to Tools -> Options -> Projects and Solutions -> Build and Run and then change the "MSBuild project build [output|build log] verbosity" to Diagnostic. At that level it will include timings which should help you track down the issue.

We had the same problem with an ASP.NET MVC web project running in Visual Studio 2013. We build the project and nothing happens for about a minute or so and then the output window shows that we are compiling.
Here's what fixed it... open the .csproj file in a text editor and set MvcBuildViews to false:
<MvcBuildViews>false</MvcBuildViews>
I had to use sysinternals process monitor to figure this out but it's clearly the cause for my situation. The site compiles in less than 5 seconds now and previously took over a minute. During that minute the Asp.net compilation process was putting files and directories into the Temporary Asp.net Files folder.
Warning: If you set this, you'll no longer precompile your views so you will lose the ability to see syntax errors in your views at build time.

There is the possibility that you are suffering from VS inspecting other freshly built assemblies for the benefit of the currently compiling project.
When an assembly is built, VS will inspect the references of the target assembly, which if they are feshly built or new versions, may include actually loading them in a .Net domain, which bears all the burdens of loading an assembly as though you were going to run it. The build can get progressively slower as it rebuilds more and more projects. When one assembly becomes newer the others do a lot more work. This is one possible explanation for why building by itself, versus already built, versus building clean, all have seemingly relevantly differing results. Its really tht the others changed and not about the one being compiled.
VS will 'mark down' the last 'internal' build number of the referenced assembly and look to see if the referenced assembly actually changed as it rolls through its build process. If its not differnt, a ton of work gets skipped. And yes, there are internal assembly build numbers that you dont control. This is probalby not in any way due to the actual c# compiler or its work or anything post-compile, but pre-compile steps necessary for the most general cases.
There are several reference oriented settings you can play with, and depending on your dev, test, or deployments needs, the functional differences may be irrelevant, however may profoundly impact how VS behaves and how long it takes during build.
Go to the references of one of the projects in Solution Explorer:
1) click on a reference
2) open the properties pane if its not (not the Property Pages or the Property Manager)
3) look at 'Copy Local', 'Embed Interop Types', 'Reference Output Assembly'; those may be very applicable and probably something good to know about regardless. I strongly suggest looking up what they do on MSDN. 'Reference Output Assembly' may or may not show in the list.
4) unload the project, and edit the .proj file in VS as text. look for the assembly reference in the XML and look for 'Private'. This means whether the assembly referenced is to be treated as though its going to be a private assembly from the referencing assemblies perspective, vs a shared one. Which is sort of a wordy way of saying, will that assembly be deployed as a unit with the other assemblies together. This is very important toward unburdening things. Background: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc164080.aspx
So the basic idea here is that you want to configure all of these to be the least expensive, both during build and after deployment. If you are building them together, then for example you probably really don't need 'Copy Local'. Id hate to say more about how you should configure them without knowing more about your needs, but its a very fine thing to go read a few good paragraphs about each. This gets very tricky however, because you also influence whether VS will use the the stale old one when resolving before the referenced one is rebuilt. As a further example explaiing that its good to go read about these, Copy Local can use the local copy, even though its stale, so having this set can be double bad. Just remember the goal at the moment is to lower the burden of VS loading newly built assemblies jsut to compile the others.
Lastly, for now, I can easily say that hanging for only 1.5 mins is getting off very lucky. There are people with much much worse build times due to things like this ;)

Some troubleshooting idea's that have not been mentioned:
Clean solution?
Delete Obj and Bin folders plus the .suo file? FYI, neither Clean nor Rebuild will delete non-build files, eg files copied during a pre-build command.
Turn off VS scanning outside files. Options > tools > environment > document > detect when file is changed outside the environment?
Rollback SVN history to confirm when it started to occur? What changed? If the project file on day 1 takes the same time, recreate the project, add all the files and build.
Otherwise could you please run Process Monitor and let us know what Visual Studio is doing in the prep-build stage?

Sounds silly, but remove all breakpoints first. It sped up my pre-build checks massively - still don't know why though.

Based on the (limited) information provided one possibility is that there could be a pre-build action specified in the project file that is slow to compile.

Try disabling platform verification task as described here.

If your individual projects are compiling correctly then all you can do is change order of compilation by setting dependent projects explicitly in configuration.
Try to visualize your project dependency hierarchy and set dependent projects. For example, if your business entities project is referenced in each project, then in configuration of each project, this project must be selected as dependent.
When an explicit build order is not set, visual studio is analyzing projects to create an order of building project. Setting explicit dependent projects wiki make visual studio skip this step and use the order provided by you.

With such an extreme delay on a single project and no other avenue seeming to provide a reason I would attempt to build that specific project while running procmon from sysinternals and filter out all the success messages. You could probably also narrow it down to just the file system actions as well. From your description I might guess that the files are being locked by an external source like the event collection or workflow management process services.
Other things to consider would be whether or not this is a totally clean build machine or if it has been used to perhaps test the builds as well? If so, is there a chance that someone mapped an IIS application path to the project directly or registered it as a service location?
If you run procmon and see no obvious locks or conflicts I would create a totally new solution and project and copy the files over to see if that project also has the same delay. If it does have the same delay I would create a sample project of the same type but generic data (essentially empty) and see if that too is slow. If the new project with the same files builds fine you can then diff the directories to see what the variance is that causes the problem (perhaps a config or project setting).

For me, thoroughly disabling code analyzers helped per instructions here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/code-quality/disable-code-analysis?view=vs-2019#net-framework-projects.
I thought my code analyzers were already off, but adding the extra xml helped.
Thanks Kaleb's for the suggestion to set "MSBuild project build [output|build log] verbosity" to Diagnostic. The first message took more than 10 seconds to display:
Property reassignment: $(Features)=";flow-analysis;flow-analysis" (previous value: ";flow-analysis") at C:\myProjectDirectory\packages\Microsoft.NetFramework.Analyzers.2.9.3\build\Microsoft.NetFramework.Analyzers.props (32,5)
Which led me to the code analyzers.

Just in case someone else trips into this issue:
In my case the delay was being caused by an invalid path entry in "additional include directories" that referred to a non accessible UNC location.
Once this was corrected, the delay disappeared.

Which visual studio solution type is right for me?

I currently have a program that i wrote that is divided up into 3 separate solutions.
Front end (all display related stuff)
Parsers (multiple (39) projects that each create a dll to parse specific data)
Globals (multiple (5) projects that each create a dll that is used by projects in the parsers solution, and by the front end).
Requirements -
Both the Front end and Parsers require the globals dlls to exist at compile time, and used at run time.
The Parsers dlls are loaded at run time using assembly.LoadReference.
Development is: C:\projects\myProg
deployed location is: C:\myProg
My problem is that I have been going back and forth with issues dealing with project dependencies, where to point to for my globals dlls. Do I point to the deployed location or the developement location, and if so, release or debug?
So I started looking up the different solution types, and I'm wondering if I should set up a partitioned solution, or a multi-solution for my particular situation.

Add all the projects to a single solution.
Change any references between projects into "project references" rather than direct references to dll files. This will fix a lot of dependency issues.
If you have any "library" files that are not changed often, then you can optionally move them into a separate solution. The output of this should be "prebuilt" release dlls that you can then reference from a standard location in your main solution (the best way to do this is to add a post build step that copies the output to your development "library binaries" folder. That way, the build process is not changed, you simply add an extra step to get the files where you need them, and you remain in full control of the build process). This works well, but is a pain if you need to change these prebuilt dlls often, so it's best only used for fairly static parts of your codebase.
Finally, consider merging many of your projects into a single project/assembly. The killer on build times is not the amount of code, it's the number of assemblies - on my PC every project adds a pretty constant 3 seconds to the build time, so by merging small projects I've saved quite a bit of build time.

Since those 3 are all part of the same system, it will probably be easier to have a single Solution with each Project added to it.
NOTE: You do not need to move anything from their current locations.
Just create a new empty solution and do a right-click Add > Existing Project... for each project you want to be a included, they will remain where they are on disk, but will be opened together.
The current ("old") solutions will be available as well, just as they are.
Also keep in mind that if you are editing the same project in two instances of VS at the same time, it will bug you about reloading the source code when a change is made and saved.
Most importantly, having the projects in the same solution will allow you to add references between them, rather than the DLL files.

why are they scattered into separate projects, Combine the Parses and globals into a single assembly. keep the UI assembly separate and as simple/small as possible.

Let's say you have a good reason for having so many projects (example: different amount of parsers available for different licenses of a product).
Managing dependencies in visual studio is made easy:
Right click your solution node
Select "Project Build Order..."
Make sure that every project does not need a project beneath it in that dialog.
About "where to deploy": visual studio does it well by default. If you're in debug, it will output to the debug folder of your solution, likewise for release.
HTH.