What's the main difference between int.Parse() and Convert.ToInt32 - c#
What is the main difference between int.Parse() and Convert.ToInt32()?
Which one is to be preferred
If you've got a string, and you expect it to always be an integer (say, if some web service is handing you an integer in string format), you'd use Int32.Parse().
If you're collecting input from a user, you'd generally use Int32.TryParse(), since it allows you more fine-grained control over the situation when the user enters invalid input.
Convert.ToInt32() takes an object as its argument. (See Chris S's answer for how it works)
Convert.ToInt32() also does not throw ArgumentNullException when its argument is null the way Int32.Parse() does. That also means that Convert.ToInt32() is probably a wee bit slower than Int32.Parse(), though in practice, unless you're doing a very large number of iterations in a loop, you'll never notice it.
Have a look in reflector:
int.Parse("32"):
public static int Parse(string s)
{
return System.Number.ParseInt32(s, NumberStyles.Integer, NumberFormatInfo.CurrentInfo);
}
which is a call to:
internal static unsafe int ParseInt32(string s, NumberStyles style, NumberFormatInfo info)
{
byte* stackBuffer = stackalloc byte[1 * 0x72];
NumberBuffer number = new NumberBuffer(stackBuffer);
int num = 0;
StringToNumber(s, style, ref number, info, false);
if ((style & NumberStyles.AllowHexSpecifier) != NumberStyles.None)
{
if (!HexNumberToInt32(ref number, ref num))
{
throw new OverflowException(Environment.GetResourceString("Overflow_Int32"));
}
return num;
}
if (!NumberToInt32(ref number, ref num))
{
throw new OverflowException(Environment.GetResourceString("Overflow_Int32"));
}
return num;
}
Convert.ToInt32("32"):
public static int ToInt32(string value)
{
if (value == null)
{
return 0;
}
return int.Parse(value, CultureInfo.CurrentCulture);
}
As the first (Dave M's) comment says.
No difference as such.
Convert.ToInt32() calls int.Parse() internally
Except for one thing Convert.ToInt32() returns 0 when argument is null
Otherwise both work the same way
int.Parse(string s)
Integer in RANGE > returns integer value
Null value > ArguementNullException
Not in format > FormatException
Value not in RANGE > OverflowException
Convert.ToInt32(string s)
Integer in RANGE > returns integer value
Null value > returns "0"
Not in format > FormatException
Value not in RANGE > OverflowException
bool isParsed = int.TryParse(string s,out res)
Integer in RANGE > returns integer value, isParsed = true
Null value > returns "0", isParsed = false
Not in format > returns "0", isParsed = false
Value not in RANGE > returns "0", isParsed = false
Try this code below.....
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string strInt = "24532";
string strNull = null;
string strWrongFrmt = "5.87";
string strAboveRange = "98765432123456";
int res;
try
{
// int.Parse() - TEST
res = int.Parse(strInt); // res = 24532
res = int.Parse(strNull); // System.ArgumentNullException
res = int.Parse(strWrongFrmt); // System.FormatException
res = int.Parse(strAboveRange); // System.OverflowException
// Convert.ToInt32(string s) - TEST
res = Convert.ToInt32(strInt); // res = 24532
res = Convert.ToInt32(strNull); // res = 0
res = Convert.ToInt32(strWrongFrmt); // System.FormatException
res = Convert.ToInt32(strAboveRange); //System.OverflowException
// int.TryParse(string s, out res) - Test
bool isParsed;
isParsed = int.TryParse(strInt, out res); // isParsed = true, res = 24532
isParsed = int.TryParse(strNull, out res); // isParsed = false, res = 0
isParsed = int.TryParse(strWrongFrmt, out res); // isParsed = false, res = 0
isParsed = int.TryParse(strAboveRange, out res); // isParsed = false, res = 0
}
catch(Exception e)
{
Console.WriteLine("Check this.\n" + e.Message);
}
}
The difference is this:
Int32.Parse() and Int32.TryParse() can only convert strings. Convert.ToInt32() can take any class that implements IConvertible. If you pass it a string, then they are equivalent, except that you get extra overhead for type comparisons, etc. If you are converting strings, then TryParse() is probably the better option.
Int32.parse(string)--->
Int32.Parse (string s) method converts the string representation of a number to its 32-bit signed integer equivalent. When s is a null reference, it will throw ArgumentNullException. If s is other than integer value, it will throw FormatException. When s represents a number less than MinValue or greater than MaxValue, it will throw OverflowException. For example:
string s1 = "1234";
string s2 = "1234.65";
string s3 = null;
string s4 = "123456789123456789123456789123456789123456789";
result = Int32.Parse(s1); //1234
result = Int32.Parse(s2); //FormatException
result = Int32.Parse(s3); //ArgumentNullException
result = Int32.Parse(s4); //OverflowException
Convert.ToInt32(string) -->
Convert.ToInt32(string s) method converts the specified string representation of 32-bit signed integer equivalent. This calls in turn Int32.Parse () method. When s is a null reference, it will return 0 rather than throw ArgumentNullException. If s is other than integer value, it will throw FormatException. When s represents a number less than MinValue or greater than MaxValue, it will throw OverflowException.
For example:
result = Convert.ToInt32(s1); // 1234
result = Convert.ToInt32(s2); // FormatException
result = Convert.ToInt32(s3); // 0
result = Convert.ToInt32(s4); // OverflowException
TryParse is faster...
The first of these functions, Parse, is one that should be familiar to
any .Net developer. This function will take a string and attempt to
extract an integer out of it and then return the integer. If it runs
into something that it can’t parse then it throws a FormatException or
if the number is too large an OverflowException. Also, it can throw an
ArgumentException if you pass it a null value.
TryParse is a new addition to the new .Net 2.0 framework that addresses some issues with the original Parse function. The main
difference is that exception handling is very slow, so if TryParse is
unable to parse the string it does not throw an exception like Parse
does. Instead, it returns a Boolean indicating if it was able to
successfully parse a number. So you have to pass into TryParse both
the string to be parsed and an Int32 out parameter to fill in. We will
use the profiler to examine the speed difference between TryParse and
Parse in both cases where the string can be correctly parsed and in
cases where the string cannot be correctly parsed.
The Convert class contains a series of functions to convert one base class into another. I believe that
Convert.ToInt32(string) just checks for a null string (if the string
is null it returns zero unlike the Parse) then just calls
Int32.Parse(string). I’ll use the profiler to confirm this and to see
if using Convert as opposed to Parse has any real effect on
performance.
Source with examples
Hope this helps.
Convert.ToInt32
has 19 overloads or 19 different ways that you can call it. Maybe more in 2010 versions.
It will attempt to convert from the following TYPES;
Object, Boolean, Char, SByte, Byte, Int16, UInt16, Int32, UInt32, Int64, UInt64, Single, Double, Decimal, String, Date
and it also has a number of other methods; one to do with a number base and 2 methods involve a System.IFormatProvider
Parse on the other hand only has 4 overloads or 4 different ways you can call the method.
Integer.Parse( s As String)
Integer.Parse( s As String, style As System.Globalization.NumberStyles )
Integer.Parse( s As String, provider As System.IFormatProvider )
Integer.Parse( s As String, style As System.Globalization.NumberStyles, provider As System.IFormatProvider )
Here is a detail for int.Parse and Convert.ToInt32:
Say, you have a char array, char[] a=['1','2','3','4'] and want to convert each element into an integer.
The Convert.ToInt32(a[0]) will give you a number of 49. It treats it as ASCII code
The int.Parse(a[0]) will give you the right output which is 1
If you have a string array string[] b=['1','2','3','4'], then Convert.ToInt32 and int.Parse will have no difference in output. Both return the right integer.
Convert.ToInt32 allows null value, it doesn't throw any errors
Int.parse does not allow null value, it throws an ArgumentNullException error.
It depends on the parameter type. For example, I just discovered today that it will convert a char directly to int using its ASCII value. Not exactly the functionality I intended...
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!
public static int ToInt32(char value)
{
return (int)value;
}
Convert.ToInt32('1'); // Returns 49
int.Parse('1'); // Returns 1
Parse() methods provide the number styles which cannot be used for Convert(). For example:
int i;
bool b = int.TryParse( "123-",
System.Globalization.NumberStyles.AllowTrailingSign,
System.Globalization.CultureInfo.InvariantCulture,
out i);
would parse the numbers with trailing sign so that i == -123
The trailing sign is popular in ERP systems.
for clarification open console application, just copy below code and paste it in static void Main(string[] args) method, I hope you can understand
public class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
int result;
bool status;
string s1 = "12345";
Console.WriteLine("input1:12345");
string s2 = "1234.45";
Console.WriteLine("input2:1234.45");
string s3 = null;
Console.WriteLine("input3:null");
string s4 = "1234567899012345677890123456789012345667890";
Console.WriteLine("input4:1234567899012345677890123456789012345667890");
string s5 = string.Empty;
Console.WriteLine("input5:String.Empty");
Console.WriteLine();
Console.WriteLine("--------Int.Parse Methods Outputs-------------");
try
{
result = int.Parse(s1);
Console.WriteLine("OutPut1:" + result);
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
Console.WriteLine("OutPut1:"+ee.Message);
}
try
{
result = int.Parse(s2);
Console.WriteLine("OutPut2:" + result);
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
Console.WriteLine("OutPut2:" + ee.Message);
}
try
{
result = int.Parse(s3);
Console.WriteLine("OutPut3:" + result);
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
Console.WriteLine("OutPut3:" + ee.Message);
}
try
{
result = int.Parse(s4);
Console.WriteLine("OutPut4:" + result);
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
Console.WriteLine("OutPut4:" + ee.Message);
}
try
{
result = int.Parse(s5);
Console.WriteLine("OutPut5:" + result);
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
Console.WriteLine("OutPut5:" + ee.Message);
}
Console.WriteLine();
Console.WriteLine("--------Convert.To.Int32 Method Outputs-------------");
try
{
result= Convert.ToInt32(s1);
Console.WriteLine("OutPut1:" + result);
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
Console.WriteLine("OutPut1:" + ee.Message);
}
try
{
result = Convert.ToInt32(s2);
Console.WriteLine("OutPut2:" + result);
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
Console.WriteLine("OutPut2:" + ee.Message);
}
try
{
result = Convert.ToInt32(s3);
Console.WriteLine("OutPut3:" + result);
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
Console.WriteLine("OutPut3:" + ee.Message);
}
try
{
result = Convert.ToInt32(s4);
Console.WriteLine("OutPut4:" + result);
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
Console.WriteLine("OutPut4:" + ee.Message);
}
try
{
result = Convert.ToInt32(s5);
Console.WriteLine("OutPut5:" + result);
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
Console.WriteLine("OutPut5:" + ee.Message);
}
Console.WriteLine();
Console.WriteLine("--------TryParse Methods Outputs-------------");
try
{
status = int.TryParse(s1, out result);
Console.WriteLine("OutPut1:" + result);
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
Console.WriteLine("OutPut1:" + ee.Message);
}
try
{
status = int.TryParse(s2, out result);
Console.WriteLine("OutPut2:" + result);
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
Console.WriteLine("OutPut2:" + ee.Message);
}
try
{
status = int.TryParse(s3, out result);
Console.WriteLine("OutPut3:" + result);
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
Console.WriteLine("OutPut3:" + ee.Message);
}
try
{
status = int.TryParse(s4, out result);
Console.WriteLine("OutPut4:" + result);
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
Console.WriteLine("OutPut4:" + ee.Message);
}
try
{
status = int.TryParse(s5, out result);
Console.WriteLine("OutPut5:" + result);
}
catch (Exception ee)
{
Console.WriteLine("OutPut5:" + ee.Message);
}
Console.Read();
}
}
Related
Simple Calculator, System.FormatException
I'm trying to make a simple calculator and its fully working but when I calculate without a = button, my program completely crashes and gives the error: System.FormatException: 'Input string was not in correct format.' This is the code that it throws an error to: second = double.Parse(aNumber); // the strings and doubles: String aNumber = ""; double first = 0.0;
b will be true or false if the try parse worked d will contain the double or 0 if it fails change anum to a valid number to test. String anum = ""; double d = 0.0; bool b = double.TryParse(anum, out d);
double.Parse will throw an exception if the input is not valid. So you either need to use try catch - or the preferred way would be to use double.TryParse as below. The value of y below will be set to the value if TryParse returns true. class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { // This will cause an exception var someString = "SomeValue"; var x = double.Parse(someString); // Comment this line out to run this example // This will work double y; if (double.TryParse(someString, out y)) { Console.WriteLine(someString + " is a valid decimal"); } else { Console.WriteLine(someString + " is not a valid decimal"); } someString = "14.7"; if (double.TryParse(someString, out y)) { Console.WriteLine(someString + " is a valid decimal"); } else { Console.WriteLine(someString + " is not a valid decimal"); } } }
string to decimal using extension methods
My string is 1799.00 I want to like this: 1.799,00 But i cannot convert this method. I'm using this function. public static decimal ToDecimal(this object str) { if (str != null) { try { return Convert.ToDecimal(str, new CultureInfo("tr-TR")); } catch (Exception) { return 0; } } else { return 0; } }
You are, probably, looking for changing formats. Given a decimal as a string in invariant culture representation ("1799.00") you want a string, but in Turkish cutrure representation: ("1.799,00") // you want to return string in Turkish culture, right? public static string ToTuskishDecimal(this object value) { if (null == value) return null; // or throw exception, or return "0,00" or return "?" try { return Convert .ToDecimal(value, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture) .ToString("N", CultureInfo.GetCultureInfo("tr-TR")); } catch (FormatException) { return "0,00"; // or "?" } } Test: decimal d = 1799.00m; string s = d.ToString(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture); // 1.799,00 Console.Write(d.ToTuskishDecimal()); // 1.799,00 Console.Write(s.ToTuskishDecimal()); In case you want to return decimal you have to format it manually when printing out: public static decimal ToDecimal(this object value) { if (null == value) return 0.00m; try { return Convert.ToDecimal(value, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture); } catch (FormatException) { return 0.00m; } } ... // return me a decimal, please decimal d = "1799.00".ToDecimal(); // when printing decimal, use Turkish culture Console.Write(d.ToString("N", CultureInfo.GetCultureInfo("tr-TR"))); you can specify Turkish culture as a default one for the entire thread: Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture = CultureInfo.GetCultureInfo("tr-TR"); ... // now you don't have to mention Turkish culture // ...but still have to specify the format Console.Write(d.ToString("N"));
I use this to obtain a decimal value: public static decimal toDecimal( string s ) { decimal res = 0; decimal.TryParse(s.Replace('.', ','), out res); return res; } In case you want to show the decimal value on the format you ask, try this: toDecimal("1700.99").ToString("N2") you will obtain the "1.700,99" string.
I wrote another simple example to obtain a decimal value in Turkish format: decimal value = 1700.00m; Console.WriteLine(value.ToString("N", CultureInfo.GetCultureInfo("tr-TR")));
Avoid round off decimals in Datagridview control
In the Datagridview I have a column "C" which is product of Column "A" and "B". Example Column A Value - 8.14 Column B Value - 0.2 Now the column C value is 12.296 and after decimal I want to show first two numbers like 12.29 without rounding to 12.30. Below is the code i used to achieve the above result. public class CustomFormatter : IFormatProvider, ICustomFormatter { public object GetFormat(Type formatType) { if (formatType == typeof(ICustomFormatter)) return this; else return null; } public string Format(string format, object arg, IFormatProvider formatProvider) { // Check whether this is an appropriate callback if (!this.Equals(formatProvider)) return null; if (arg == null) return null; string numericString = arg.ToString(); decimal result = 0; if (Decimal.TryParse(numericString, out result)) { return ((Math.Truncate(result * 100)) / 100).ToString(); } else { return null; } } } private void gvItemDetails_CellFormatting(object sender, DataGridViewCellFormattingEventArgs e) { try { if (e.ColumnIndex == gvItemDetails.Columns["Vat Amount"].Index) { gvItemDetails[e.ColumnIndex, e.RowIndex].Value = String.Format(new CustomFormatter(), "{0}", e.Value); } } catch (Exception ex) { MessageBox.Show(ex.Message); } } When i put a break point on cellformatting code..i can see the code is repeated continously but not returning any stackoverflow exception. When i remove the breakpoint its working. Can you please advice what might be the problem or suggest any other alternative to prevent it from rounding an show 12.29 not 12.30. Thanks, Prathap.
First, i tried to use the same method which you used. It works perfectly fine for me and produces desired "12.29". string numericString = "12.2963"; string truncatedString = string.Empty; decimal result = 0; if (Decimal.TryParse(numericString, out result)) { truncatedString = ((Math.Truncate(result * 100)) / 100).ToString(); } In case, above method doesn't work for you, another simple alternative would be to use string.substring (this will be useful only when intermediate decimal value is not required for you). string numericString = "12.2963"; string truncatedString = string.Empty;value int endIndex = numericString.IndexOf('.'); truncatedString = numericString.Substring(0, endIndex + 3); Update: Though i haven't tested it, you should be able to define format provider this way : this.dataGridView1.Columns["XYZ"].DefaultCellStyle.FormatProvider = new CustomFormatter(); and for format (here format string will have pre-defined meaning) : this.dataGridView1.Columns["XYZ"].DefaultCellStyle.Format = "c"; Update 2: Unfortunately, even if you are using FormatProvider, you still need to handle cellformatting event; Check This. Good news is that you don't need to use FormatProvider for this. Try following format, it should work for you: this.dataGridView1.Columns["XYZ"].DefaultCellStyle.Format = "0.##";
C# How to format a double to one decimal place without rounding
I need to format a double value to one decimal place without it rounding. double value = 3.984568438706 string result = ""; What I have tried is: 1) result = value.ToString("##.##", System.Globalization.CultureInfo.InvariantCulture) + "%"; // returns 3.98% 2) result = value.ToString("##.#", System.Globalization.CultureInfo.InvariantCulture) + "%"; // returns 4% 3) result = value.ToString("##.0", System.Globalization.CultureInfo.InvariantCulture) + "%"; // returns 4.0% 4) (Following other suggestions) value = (value / 100); result = String.Format("{0:P1}", Math.Truncate(value * 10000) / 10000); // returns 4.0% result = string.Format("{0:0.0%}",value); // returns 4.0% What I need to display is the value 3.9% Thanks for any help in advance.
result=string.Format("{0:0.0}",Math.Truncate(value*10)/10);
I would make a utility method to handle this: static double Truncate(double value, int digits) { double mult = System.Math.Pow(10.0, digits); return System.Math.Truncate(value * mult) / mult; } You could then do: result = Truncate(value, 1).ToString("##.#", System.Globalization.CultureInfo.InvariantCulture) + "%"; Note that you may also want Math.Floor instead of truncate - but it depends on how you want negative values handled.
I know this is a old thread but I've just had to do this. While the approaches here work I want a easy way to be able to affect a lot of calls so using the Math.Truncate on all the calls to string.format wasn't really a good option. Thus, I made a custom format provider which would allow me to add truncation to the formatting string, eg string.format(new FormatProvider(), "{0:T}", 1.1299); // 1.12 string.format(new FormatProvider(), "{0:T(3)", 1.12399); // 1.123 string.format(new FormatProvider(), "{0:T(1)0,000.0", 1000.9999); // 1,000.9 The implementation is pretty simple and is easily extendible to other requirements. public class FormatProvider : IFormatProvider, ICustomFormatter { public object GetFormat(Type formatType) { if (formatType == typeof (ICustomFormatter)) { return this; } return null; } public string Format(string format, object arg, IFormatProvider formatProvider) { if (arg.GetType() != typeof (double)) { try { return HandleOtherFormats(format, arg); } catch (FormatException e) { throw new FormatException(string.Format("The format of '{0}' is invalid.", format)); } } if (format.StartsWith("T")) { int dp = 2; int idx = 1; if (format.Length > 1) { if (format[1] == '(') { int closeIdx = format.IndexOf(')'); if (closeIdx > 0) { if (int.TryParse(format.Substring(2, closeIdx - 2), out dp)) { idx = closeIdx + 1; } } else { throw new FormatException(string.Format("The format of '{0}' is invalid.", format)); } } } double mult = Math.Pow(10, dp); arg = Math.Truncate((double)arg * mult) / mult; format = format.Substring(idx); } try { return HandleOtherFormats(format, arg); } catch (FormatException e) { throw new FormatException(string.Format("The format of '{0}' is invalid.", format)); } } private string HandleOtherFormats(string format, object arg) { if (arg is IFormattable) { return ((IFormattable) arg).ToString(format, CultureInfo.CurrentCulture); } return arg != null ? arg.ToString() : String.Empty; } }
ToString() doesn't do it. You have to add extra code. The other answers show math approaches, my approach below is kind of outside-the-box. string result = value.ToString(); Console.WriteLine("{0}", result.Substring(0, result.LastIndexOf('.') + 2)); This is a fairly simple brute force approach, but it does the trick when the decimal is a '.'. Here's an extension method to ease the pain (and deals with the decimal point). public static class Extensions { public static string ToStringNoTruncate(this double me, int decimalplaces = 1) { string result = me.ToString(); char dec = System.Globalization.CultureInfo.CurrentCulture.NumberFormat.NumberDecimalSeparator[0]; return result.Substring(0, result.LastIndexOf(dec) + decimalplaces + 1); } }
( Math.Truncate( ( value * 10 ) ) / 1000 ).ToString( "#.#%" )
Just use modulo operator + built in ToString: result = (value - (value % 0.1)).ToString("N1") + "%";
How can I check if a string is a number?
I'd like to know on C# how to check if a string is a number (and just a number). Example : 141241 Yes 232a23 No 12412a No and so on... Is there a specific function?
Look up double.TryParse() if you're talking about numbers like 1, -2 and 3.14159. Some others are suggesting int.TryParse(), but that will fail on decimals. string candidate = "3.14159"; if (double.TryParse(candidate, out var parsedNumber)) { // parsedNumber is a valid number! } EDIT: As Lukasz points out below, we should be mindful of the thread culture when parsing numbers with a decimal separator, i.e. do this to be safe: double.TryParse(candidate, NumberStyles.AllowDecimalPoint, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, out var parsedNumber)
If you just want to check if a string is all digits (without being within a particular number range) you can use: string test = "123"; bool allDigits = test.All(char.IsDigit);
Yes there is int temp; int.TryParse("141241", out temp) = true int.TryParse("232a23", out temp) = false int.TryParse("12412a", out temp) = false Hope this helps.
Use Int32.TryParse() int num; bool isNum = Int32.TryParse("[string to test]", out num); if (isNum) { //Is a Number } else { //Not a number } MSDN Reference
Use int.TryParse(): string input = "141241"; int ouput; bool result = int.TryParse(input, out output); result will be true if it was.
Yep - you can use the Visual Basic one in C#.It's all .NET; the VB functions IsNumeric, IsDate, etc are actually static methods of the Information class. So here's your code: using Microsoft.VisualBasic; ... Information.IsNumeric( object );
int value; if (int.TryParse("your string", out value)) { Console.WriteLine(value); }
This is my personal favorite private static bool IsItOnlyNumbers(string searchString) { return !String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString) && searchString.All(char.IsDigit); }
Perhaps you're looking for the int.TryParse function. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.int32.tryparse.aspx
Many datatypes have a TryParse-method that will return true if it managed to successfully convert to that specific type, with the parsed value as an out-parameter. In your case these might be of interest: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.int32.tryparse.aspx http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.decimal.tryparse.aspx
int result = 0; bool isValidInt = int.TryParse("1234", out result); //isValidInt should be true //result is the integer 1234 Of course, you can check against other number types, like decimal or double.
You should use the TryParse method for the int string text1 = "x"; int num1; bool res = int.TryParse(text1, out num1); if (res == false) { // String is not a number. }
If you want to validate if each character is a digit and also return the character that is not a digit as part of the error message validation, then you can loop through each char. string num = "123x"; foreach (char c in num.ToArray()) { if (!Char.IsDigit(c)) { Console.WriteLine("character " + c + " is not a number"); return; } }
int.TryPasrse() Methode is the best way so if the value was string you will never have an exception , instead of the TryParse Methode return to you bool value so you will know if the parse operation succeeded or failed string yourText = "2"; int num; bool res = int.TryParse(yourText, out num); if (res == true) { // the operation succeeded and you got the number in num parameter } else { // the operation failed }
string str = "123"; int i = Int.Parse(str); If str is a valid integer string then it will be converted to integer and stored in i other wise Exception occur.
Starting with C# 7.0, you can declare the out variable in the argument list of the method call, rather than in a separate variable declaration. This produces more compact, readable code, and also prevents you from inadvertently assigning a value to the variable before the method call. bool isDouble = double.TryParse(yourString, out double result); https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-reference/keywords/out-parameter-modifier
You could use something like the following code: string numbers = "numbers you want to check"; Regex regex = new Regex("^[0-9]+$")); if (regex.IsMatch(numbers)) { //string value is a number }
public static void Main() { string id = "141241"; string id1 = "232a23"; string id2 = "12412a"; validation( id, id1, id2); } public static void validation(params object[] list) { string s = ""; int result; string _Msg = ""; for (int i = 0; i < list.Length; i++) { s = (list[i].ToString()); if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(s)) { _Msg = "Please Enter the value"; } if (int.TryParse(s, out result)) { _Msg = "Enter " + s.ToString() + ", value is Integer"; } else { _Msg = "This is not Integer value "; } } }
Try This here i perform addition of no and concatenation of string private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { bool chk,chk1; int chkq; chk = int.TryParse(textBox1.Text, out chkq); chk1 = int.TryParse(textBox2.Text, out chkq); if (chk1 && chk) { double a = Convert.ToDouble(textBox1.Text); double b = Convert.ToDouble(textBox2.Text); double c = a + b; textBox3.Text = Convert.ToString(c); } else { string f, d,s; f = textBox1.Text; d = textBox2.Text; s = f + d; textBox3.Text = s; } }
I'm not a programmer of particularly high skills, but when I needed to solve this, I chose what is probably a very non-elegant solution, but it suits my needs. private bool IsValidNumber(string _checkString, string _checkType) { float _checkF; int _checkI; bool _result = false; switch (_checkType) { case "int": _result = int.TryParse(_checkString, out _checkI); break; case "float": _result = Single.TryParse(_checkString, out _checkF); break; } return _result; } I simply call this with something like: if (IsValidNumber("1.2", "float")) etc... It means that I can get a simple true/false answer back during If... Then comparisons, and that was the important factor for me. If I need to check for other types, then I add a variable, and a case statement as required.
use this double num; string candidate = "1"; if (double.TryParse(candidate, out num)) { // It's a number! }
int num; bool isNumeric = int.TryParse("123", out num);
namespace Exception { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { bool isNumeric; int n; do { Console.Write("Enter a number:"); isNumeric = int.TryParse(Console.ReadLine(), out n); } while (isNumeric == false); Console.WriteLine("Thanks for entering number" + n); Console.Read(); } } }
Regex.IsMatch(stringToBeChecked, #"^\d+$") Regex.IsMatch("141241", #"^\d+$") // True Regex.IsMatch("232a23", #"^\d+$") // False Regex.IsMatch("12412a", #"^\d+$") // False
The problem with some of the suggested solutions is that they don't take into account various float number formats. The following function does it: public bool IsNumber(String value) { double d; if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(value)) return false; else return double.TryParse(value.Trim(), System.Globalization.NumberStyles.Any, System.Globalization.CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, out d); } It assumes that the various float number styles such es decimal point (English) and decima comma (German) are all allowed. If that is not the case, change the number styles paramater. Note that Any does not include hex mumbers, because the type double does not support it.