So here's a hypothetical. From someone fairly new to the whole C# and Unity thing:
Suppose for a moment that I have a series of string[] arrays. All of which have similar naming convention. For example:
public string[] UndeadEntities =
{
// stuff
};
public string[] DemonEntities =
{
// stuff
};
Now suppose I want to call one of them at random, I have another list that contains the names of all of those arrays and I return it at random.
My problem is that I grab the name from the array and it's a string, not something I can use. So my question is this:
is there any way for me to use this string and use it to call the above mentioned arrays.
Something like this is what I'm up to but unsure where to go from here and I really would like to avoid making a massive series of If Else statements just for that.
public string[] EnemiesType = { // list of all the other arrays }
public string enemiesTypeGeneratedArrayName = "";
public void GenerateEncounterGroup()
{
enemiesTypeGeneratedArrayName = EnemiesType[Random.Range(0, 12)];
}
Can I nest arrays inside of other arrays? Is there another alternative?
I'm not sure if it is possible at all but if it is, I'll take any pointers as to where to go from there. Thanks.
There are several solutions to your specific problem, an easy one is using Dictionaries:
A Dictionary is a data structure wher you have a key (usually a string) and a value (whatever type you may want to store).
What you can do is at start, initialized a Dictionary were each key is your enemy type, and the value it store is your array, something like:
Dictionary<string, string[]> enemyArrays= new Dictionary<string, string[]>();
.
void Start()
{
enemyArrays["typeA"] = myArrayA;
enemyArrays["typeB"] = myArrayB;
}
Then when you need to get that array, just:
enemiesTypeGeneratedArrayName = EnemiesType[Random.Range(0, 12)];
string[] myRandomArray =enemyArrays[enemiesTypeGeneratedArrayName];
string randomEnemy = myRandomArray[index];
Here you can read more about Dictionary class if you want.
There are other ways to do it, but I think this one is pretty easy to implement in the code you already made, and Dicionaries are cool haha.
I hope is clear:)
Related
I have a c# class that looks like this:
public class MemberData
{
public int meme_ck;
public string meme_name;
public bool meme_active;
public MemberData(int ck2, string name2, bool active2)
{
meme_ck = ck2;
meme_name = name2;
meme_active = active2;
}
}
I have made two arrays out of that class:
private MemberData[] memarray1 = new MemberData[10000];
private MemberData[] memarray2 = new Memberdata[10000];
Over the course of my application I do a bunch of stuff with these two arrays and values change, etc. Member's name or active status may change which results in the ararys becoming different.
Eventually I need to compare them in order to do things to the other one based on what results are kicked out in the first one.
For example, member is de-activated in the first array based on something application does, I need to update array 2 to de-activate that same member.
I am trying to use some database design philosphy with the int CK (contrived-key) to be able to rapidly look up the entry in the other array based on the CK.
Since I can't figure it out I've had to resort to using nested for loops like this, which sucks:
foreach (Memberdata md in memarray1)
{
foreach (Memberdatamd2 in memarray2)
{
if (md.ck = md2.ck)
{
//de-activate member
}
}
}
Is there a better way to do this? I just want to find the index in the second array based on CK when I have the CK value from the first array.
Any other tips or advice you have about structure would be appreciated as well. Should I be using something other than arrays? How would I accomplish this same thing with Lists?
Thanks!
Should I be using something other than arrays?
Yes. Don't use arrays; they are seldom the right data structure to use.
How would I accomplish this same thing with Lists?
Lists are only marginally better. They don't support an efficient lookup-by-key operation which is what you need.
It sounds like what you want is instead of two arrays, two Dictionary<int, MemberData> where the key is the ck.
I totally agree with Eric Lippert's answer above. It is better you do not use Array.
Same thing can be achieved using List<MemberData>. You can use LINQ as well to query your DataStructure.
Following is one of the way just to achieve your result using array
class Program
{
static MemberData[] memarray1 = new MemberData[10000];
static MemberData[] memarray2 = new MemberData[10000];
static void Main(string[] args)
{
for (int i = 0; i < memarray1.Length; i++)
{
memarray1[i] = new MemberData(i + 1, "MemName" + i + 1, true);
memarray2[i] = new MemberData(i + 1, "MemName" + i + 1, true);
}
// SIMULATING YOUR APP OPERATION OF CHANGING A RANDOM ARRAY VALUE IN memarray1
int tempIndex = new Random().Next(0, 9999);
memarray1[tempIndex].meme_name = "ChangedName";
memarray1[tempIndex].meme_active = false;
//FOR YOUR UDERSTADNING TAKING meme_ck IN AN INTEGER VARIABLE
int ck_in_mem1 = memarray1[tempIndex].meme_ck;
//FINDING ITEM IN ARRAY2
MemberData tempData = memarray2.Where(val => val.meme_ck == ck_in_mem1).FirstOrDefault();
// THIS IS YOUR ITEM.
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
I have 2 object instances of same type. (To be precise this is Unity3D's AudioSource) I need to apply some action like initializing, destroying, etc to both, so I think storing them in an array would be a good idea so I can iterate.
AudioSource[] audioSources = new AudioSource[2];
With this I can foreach on the array and write initializing code and other common tasks only once.
But these two instances serves different purpose, say, the first is an AudioSource for BGM and the second is for SFX. This way the code will be more readable and I can still iterate over two instances by using the array.
So I think I should give an alternate names for each instance like bgmSource and sfxSource. I'd like to ask that is this the correct approach?
AudioSource bgmSource = audioSources[0];
AudioSource sfxSource = audioSources[1];
Another solution is using a Dictionary, its not very suitable for such small arrays
but it can help you distinct between objects without using second variable to store reference
to the one in the array.
For example:
Dictionary< string, AudioSource > audioSources;
audioSources = new Dictionary<string, AudioSource>
{
"BGM_SOURCE", new AudioSource(),
"SFX_SOURCE", new AudioSource()
};
Then you can also use enum for keeping track of dictionary keys instead of using string/constant values:
// Enum declaration
enum AudioSourceNames
{
BGM_SOURCE,
SFX_SOURCE
}
// Called before first update
public void Start()
{
// Dictionary declaration
Dictionary< int, AudioSource > audioSources;
audioSources = new Dictionary< int, AudioSource >
{
( int )BGM_SOURCE, new AudioSource(),
( int )SFX_SOURCE, new AudioSource()
};
// Accessing the dictionary
audioSources[ ( int )AudioSourceNames.BGM_SOURCE ].Play();
}
BTW: You can use the enumarator technique with array, this way you won't have to remember each AudioSource index in the array
From my point of view your solution seem good.
initializing code and other common tasks only once
The code for these things is hopefully in AudioSource, isn't it?
Well, it's legal. It's just a matter of preference/design. I would say that you could put them in a Dictionary of some sort. So you can properly label them through a key. That way you won't need to remember that [0] is bgmSource and [1] is sfxSource.
Let's say a program like this:
class MyClass
{
public int Numbers;
public char Letters;
}
class Program
{
static void Main()
{
var mc = new MyClass[5];
for (var i = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
mc[i].Numbers = i + 1;
mc[i].Letters = (char) (i + 65);
}
}
}
Now, let's suppose an 'X' method that requires ALL the numbers contained in the object mc, in a separate array, that's sent as a parameter.
My first idea is a for, a new integers array, and copy one by one onto its respective position. But, what if the MyClass gets different, now it has strings and floats, and I wanna pull out the strings, now the for has to be completely redefined in its inside part to create the needed array for another 'X' method.
I know of cases where Linq helps a lot, for example, generics for Sum, Average, Count and another numeric functions, and of course, it's combination with lambda expressions.
I'm wondering if something similar exists to make the above arrays of MyClass (and anothers of course) in a faster-generic way?
If you want to use LINQ, you can do something like the following:
int [] numbers = mc.Select<MyClass, int>(m => mc.Number).ToArray();
To make it more generic than that, it gets a bit more complicated, and you may need reflection, or dynamic objects. A simple example with reflection would be:
private TValue[] ExtractFields<TClass, TValue>(TClass[] classObjs, string fieldName)
{
FieldInfo fInfo = typeof(TClass).GetField(fieldName, BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance);
if (fInfo != null && fInfo.FieldType.Equals(typeof(TValue)))
return classObjs.Select<TClass, TValue>(c => (TValue)fInfo.GetValue(c)).ToArray();
else
throw new NotSupportedException("Unidentified field, or different field type");
}
And then just call it like:
int [] fields = ExtractField<MyClass, int>(mc, "Number");
If you are using C# 4.0, then you may use dynamic
class MyClass
{
public dynamic Numbers;
public char Letters;
}
EDIT: based on comments
I am not sure if this is what you want:
int[] arr = mc.Select(a => a.Numbers).ToArray<int>();
or without casting
int[] arr = mc.Select(a => a.Numbers).ToArray();
Why not just use Dictionary<int, char>, or if the data type is unknown then simply Dictionary<object, object>
If your goal is to generate a new array which is detached from the original array, but contains data copied from it, the most generic thing you could do would be to define a method like:
T my_array[]; // The array which holds the real things
U[] CopyAsConvertedArray<U>(Func<T,U> ConversionMethod);
That would allow one to generate a new array which extracts items from the original using any desired method.
It seems strange that the language apparently includes no suitable functionality.
I find myself with data that would best be expressed as a multi-dimensional array but it's utterly constant, there is no way anyone could want to change it without also changing the associated code. Faced with such stuff in Delphi the answer is obvious--a constant whose value is the table. However, C# doesn't seem to support anything like this.
Google shows many people griping about this, no good answers.
How do people handle this sort of situation?
(And don't say that constants don't belong in code--the last one I bumped into was all possible permutations of 4 items. Unless the very nature of spacetime changes this is set in stone.)
What happened?? There was an answer that came pretty close, I was asking about a detail and it vanished! Simply declaring an array sort of does the job--the only problem is that the array allocation is going to run every time. The one in front of me contains 96 values--how do I get it to initialize only once? Do I just have to accept scoping it far wider than it should be? (As it stands it's in one 3-line routine that's inside what amounts to an O(n^3) routine.)
ReadOnlyCollection
There's a page in in the C# FAQ about this specific thing.
They suggest using a static readonly array:
static readonly int[,] constIntArray = new int[,] { { 1, 2, 3 }, { 4, 5, 6 }};
However, be aware that this is only sort of constant - you can still reassign individual elements within the array. Also, this has to be specified on the class level since it's a static, but it will work fairly well.
You could use a readonly Hashtable. The only downside is that readonly does not prevent you from changing the value of a particular item in the Hashtable. So it is not truly const.
readonly Hashtable table = new Hashtable(){{1,"One"},{2,"Two"}};
Or an array
public readonly string[,] arry = new string[,]{{"1","2"},{"2","4"}};
Yes, you will need to declare the variable in the appropriate scope so it does not get initialized more than once.
Like they say, just add another layer of indirection. C# doesn't need to provide a specialized data structure as a language primitive, although one does, at times, wish there was a way to make any class immutable, but that's another discussion.
Now you didn't mention if you need to store different things in there. In fact you didn't mention anything other than multi-dimensional and no ability to change the values or the arrays. I don't even know if the access pattern (a single int,int,int indexer) is appropriate.
But in general, for a 3-dimensional jagged array, the following works (but it isn't pretty).
One caveat is the type you construct it with also needs to be immutable, but that's your problem. You can just create your own read-only wrapper.
public static readonly ReadOnlyThreeDimensions<int> MyGlobalThree
= new ReadOnlyThreeDimensions<int>(IntInitializer);
public class ReadOnlyThreeDimensions<T>
{
private T[][][] _arrayOfT;
public ReadOnlyThreeDimensions(Func<T[][][]> initializer)
{
_arrayOfT = initializer();
}
public ReadOnlyThreeDimensions(T[][][] arrayOfT)
{
_arrayOfT = arrayOfT;
}
public T this [int x, int y, int z]
{
get
{
return _arrayOfT[x][y][z];
}
}
}
And then you just need to provide some initializer method, or assign it in a static constructor.
public static int[][][] IntInitializer()
{
return xyz // something that constructs a [][][]
}
Enumerations, surely.
Well, I've taken the approach of the following, it's a little nasty to read but easy to edit.
public struct Something
{
public readonly int Number;
public readonly string Name;
public Something(int num, string name) { this.Number = num; this.Name = name; }
}
public readonly Something[] GlobalCollection = new Something[]
{
new Something(1, "One"),
new Something(2, "Two"),
};
my problem is as follows:
Im building a console application which asks the user for the numbers of objects it should create and 4 variables that have to be assigned for every object.
The new objects name should contain a counting number starting from 1.
How would you solve this?
Im thinking about a class but im unsure about how to create the objects in runtime from userinput. Is a loop the best way to go?
What kind of class, struct, list, array .... would you recommend. The variables in the object are always the same type but i need to name them properly so I can effectivly write methods to perform operations on them in a later phase of the program.
Im just learning the language and I would be very thankful for a advice on how to approach my problem.
If I understand your problem correctly:
class MyClass
{
public int ObjectNumber { get; set; }
public string SomeVariable { get; set; }
public string AnotherVariable { get; set; }
}
// You should use keyboard input value for this
int objectsToCreate = 10;
// Create an array to hold all your objects
MyClass[] myObjects = new MyClass[objectsToCreate];
for (int i = 0; i < objectsToCreate; i++)
{
// Instantiate a new object, set it's number and
// some other properties
myObjects[i] = new MyClass()
{
ObjectNumber = i + 1,
SomeVariable = "SomeValue",
AnotherVariable = "AnotherValue"
};
}
This doesn't quite do what you described. Add in keyboard input and stuff :) Most of this code needs to be in some kind of Main method to actually run, etc.
In this case, I've chosen a class to hold your 4 variables. I have only implemented 3 though, and I've implemented them as properties, rather than fields. I'm not sure this is necessary for your assignment, but it is generally a good habit to not have publically accessible fields, and I don't want to be the one to teach you bad habits. See auto-implemented properties.
You mentioned a struct, which would be an option as well, depending on what you want to store in it. Generally though, a class would be a safer bet.
A loop would indeed be the way to go to initialize your objects. In this case, a for loop is most practical. It starts counting at 0, because we're putting the objects in an array, and array indexes in C# always start at 0. This means you have to use i + 1 to assign to the object number, or the objects would be numbered 0 - 9, just like their indexes in the array.
I'm initializing the objects using object initializer syntax, which is new in C# 3.0.
The old fashioned way would be to assign them one by one:
myObjects[i] = new MyClass();
myObjects[i].ObjectNumber = i + 1;
myObjects[i].SomeVariable = "SomeValue";
Alternatively, you could define a constructor for MyClass that takes 3 parameters.
One last thing: some people here posted answers which use a generic List (List<MyClass>) instead of an array. This will work fine, but in my example I chose to use the most basic form you could use. A List does not have a fixed size, unlike an array (notice how I initialized the array). Lists are great if you want to add more items later, or if you have no idea beforehand how many items you will need to store. However, in this case, we have the keyboard input, so we know exactly how many items we'll have. Thus: array. It will implicitly tell whoever is reading your code, that you do not intend to add more items later.
I hope this answered some questions, and raised some new ones. See just how deep the rabbit hole goes :P
Use a list or an array. List example:
int numberOfObjects = 3;
List<YourType> listOfObjects = new List<YourType>();
for(int i = 0 ; i < numberOfObjects ; i++ )
{
// Get input and create object ....
// Then add to your list
listOfObjects.Add(element);
}
Here, listOfObjects is a Generic list that can contain a variable number of objects of the type YourType. The list will automatically resize so it can hold the number of objects you add to it. Hope this helps.
If I understood what you are asking you could probably do something like this:
class Foo
{
private static int count;
public string name;
public Foo(...){
name = ++count + "";
}
}
I'm guessing what you're trying to do here, but this is a stab in the dark. The problem I'm having is dealing with the whole "the new objects name should contain a counting number starting from 1" thing. Anyway, here's my attempt:
public class UserInstantiatedClass
{
public int UserSetField1;
public int UserSetField2;
public int UserSetField3;
public int UserSetField4;
public string UserSpecifiedClassName;
}
public static class MyProgram
{
public static void Main(string [] args)
{
// gather user input, place into variables named
// numInstances, className, field1, field2, field3, field4
List<UserInstantiatedClass> instances = new List< UserInstantiatedClass>();
UserInstantiatedClass current = null;
for(int i=1; i<=numInstances; i++)
{
current = new UserInstantiatedClass();
current.UserSpecifiedClassName = className + i.ToString(); // adds the number 1, 2, 3, etc. to the class name specified
current.UserSetField1 = field1;
current.UserSetField2 = field2;
current.UserSetField3 = field3;
current.UserSetField4 = field4;
instances.Add(current);
}
// after this loop, the instances list contains the number of instances of the class UserInstantiatedClass specified by the numInstances variable.
}
}