Develop Reference

Asp.Net Regex C# replace function not working [duplicate]

https://regex101.com/r/sB9wW6/1
(?:(?<=\s)|^)#(\S+) <-- the problem in positive lookbehind
Working like this on prod: (?:\s|^)#(\S+), but I need a correct start index (without space).
Here is in JS:
var regex = new RegExp(/(?:(?<=\s)|^)#(\S+)/g);
Error parsing regular expression: Invalid regular expression:
/(?:(?<=\s)|^)#(\S+)/
What am I doing wrong?
UPDATE
Ok, no lookbehind in JS :(
But anyways, I need a regex to get the proper start and end index of my match. Without leading space.

Make sure you always select the right regex engine at regex101.com. See an issue that occurred due to using a JS-only compatible regex with [^] construct in Python.
JS regex - at the time of answering this question - did not support lookbehinds. Now, it becomes more and more adopted after its introduction in ECMAScript 2018. You do not really need it here since you can use capturing groups:
var re = /(?:\s|^)#(\S+)/g;
var str = 's #vln1\n#vln2\n';
var res = [];
while ((m = re.exec(str)) !== null) {
res.push(m[1]);
}
console.log(res);
The (?:\s|^)#(\S+) matches a whitespace or the start of string with (?:\s|^), then matches #, and then matches and captures into Group 1 one or more non-whitespace chars with (\S+).
To get the start/end indices, use
var re = /(\s|^)#\S+/g;
var str = 's #vln1\n#vln2\n';
var pos = [];
while ((m = re.exec(str)) !== null) {
pos.push([m.index+m[1].length, m.index+m[0].length]);
}
console.log(pos);
BONUS
My regex works at regex101.com, but not in...
First of all, have you checked the Code Generator link in the Tools pane on the left?
All languages - "Literal string" vs. "String literal" alert - Make sure you test against the same text used in code, literal string, at the regex tester. A common scenario is copy/pasting a string literal value directly into the test string field, with all string escape sequences like \n (line feed char), \r (carriage return), \t (tab char). See Regex_search c++, for example. Mind that they must be replaced with their literal counterparts. So, if you have in Python text = "Text\n\n abc", you must use Text, two line breaks, abc in the regex tester text field. Text.*?abc will never match it although you might think it "works". Yes, . does not always match line break chars, see How do I match any character across multiple lines in a regular expression?
All languages - Backslash alert - Make sure you correctly use a backslash in your string literal, in most languages, in regular string literals, use double backslash, i.e. \d used at regex101.com must written as \\d. In raw string literals, use a single backslash, same as at regex101. Escaping word boundary is very important, since, in many languages (C#, Python, Java, JavaScript, Ruby, etc.), "\b" is used to define a BACKSPACE char, i.e. it is a valid string escape sequence. PHP does not support \b string escape sequence, so "/\b/" = '/\b/' there.
All languages - Default flags - Global and Multiline - Note that by default m and g flags are enabled at regex101.com. So, if you use ^ and $, they will match at the start and end of lines correspondingly. If you need the same behavior in your code check how multiline mode is implemented and either use a specific flag, or - if supported - use an inline (?m) embedded (inline) modifier. The g flag enables multiple occurrence matching, it is often implemented using specific functions/methods. Check your language reference to find the appropriate one.
line-breaks - Line endings at regex101.com are LF only, you can't test strings with CRLF endings, see regex101.com VS myserver - different results. Solutions can be different for each regex library: either use \R (PCRE, Java, Ruby) or some kind of \v (Boost, PCRE), \r?\n, (?:\r\n?|\n)/(?>\r\n?|\n) (good for .NET) or [\r\n]+ in other libraries (see answers for C#, PHP). Another issue related to the fact that you test your regex against a multiline string (not a list of standalone strings/lines) is that your patterns may consume the end of line, \n, char with negated character classes, see an issue like that. \D matched the end of line char, and in order to avoid it, [^\d\n] could be used, or other alternatives.
php - You are dealing with Unicode strings, or want shorthand character classes to match Unicode characters, too (e.g. \w+ to match Стрибижев or Stribiżew, or \s+ to match hard spaces), then you need to use u modifier, see preg_match() returns 0 although regex testers work - To match all occurrences, use preg_match_all, not preg_match with /...pattern.../g, see PHP preg_match to find multiple occurrences and "Unknown modifier 'g' in..." when using preg_match in PHP?- Your regex with inline backreference like \1 refuses to work? Are you using a double quoted string literal? Use a single-quoted one, see Backreference does not work in PHP
phplaravel - Mind you need the regex delimiters around the pattern, see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22430529
python - Note that re.search, re.match, re.fullmatch, re.findall and re.finditer accept the regex as the first argument, and the input string as the second argument. Not re.findall("test 200 300", r"\d+"), but re.findall(r"\d+", "test 200 300"). If you test at regex101.com, please check the "Code Generator" page. - You used re.match that only searches for a match at the start of the string, use re.search: Regex works fine on Pythex, but not in Python - If the regex contains capturing group(s), re.findall returns a list of captures/capture tuples. Either use non-capturing groups, or re.finditer, or remove redundant capturing groups, see re.findall behaves weird - If you used ^ in the pattern to denote start of a line, not start of the whole string, or used $ to denote the end of a line and not a string, pass re.M or re.MULTILINE flag to re method, see Using ^ to match beginning of line in Python regex
- If you try to match some text across multiple lines, and use re.DOTALL or re.S, or [\s\S]* / [\s\S]*?, and still nothing works, check if you read the file line by line, say, with for line in file:. You must pass the whole file contents as the input to the regex method, see Getting Everything Between Two Characters Across New Lines. - Having trouble adding flags to regex and trying something like pattern = r"/abc/gi"? See How to add modifers to regex in python?
c#, .net - .NET regex does not support possessive quantifiers like ++, *+, ??, {1,10}?, see .NET regex matching digits between optional text with possessive quantifer is not working - When you match against a multiline string and use RegexOptions.Multiline option (or inline (?m) modifier) with an $ anchor in the pattern to match entire lines, and get no match in code, you need to add \r? before $, see .Net regex matching $ with the end of the string and not of line, even with multiline enabled - To get multiple matches, use Regex.Matches, not Regex.Match, see RegEx Match multiple times in string - Similar case as above: splitting a string into paragraphs, by a double line break sequence - C# / Regex Pattern works in online testing, but not at runtime - You should remove regex delimiters, i.e. #"/\d+/" must actually look like #"\d+", see Simple and tested online regex containing regex delimiters does not work in C# code - If you unnecessarily used Regex.Escape to escape all characters in a regular expression (like Regex.Escape(#"\d+\.\d+")) you need to remove Regex.Escape, see Regular Expression working in regex tester, but not in c#
dartflutter - Use raw string literal, RegExp(r"\d"), or double backslashes (RegExp("\\d")) - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59085824
javascript - Double escape backslashes in a RegExp("\\d"): Why do regex constructors need to be double escaped?
- (Negative) lookbehinds unsupported by most browsers: Regex works on browser but not in Node.js - Strings are immutable, assign the .replace result to a var - The .replace() method does change the string in place - Retrieve all matches with str.match(/pat/g) - Regex101 and Js regex search showing different results or, with RegExp#exec, RegEx to extract all matches from string using RegExp.exec- Replace all pattern matches in string: Why does javascript replace only first instance when using replace?
javascriptangular - Double the backslashes if you define a regex with a string literal, or just use a regex literal notation, see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56097782
java - Word boundary not working? Make sure you use double backslashes, "\\b", see Regex \b word boundary not works - Getting invalid escape sequence exception? Same thing, double backslashes - Java doesn't work with regex \s, says: invalid escape sequence - No match found is bugging you? Run Matcher.find() / Matcher.matches() - Why does my regex work on RegexPlanet and regex101 but not in my code? - .matches() requires a full string match, use .find(): Java Regex pattern that matches in any online tester but doesn't in Eclipse - Access groups using matcher.group(x): Regex not working in Java while working otherwise - Inside a character class, both [ and ] must be escaped - Using square brackets inside character class in Java regex - You should not run matcher.matches() and matcher.find() consecutively, use only if (matcher.matches()) {...} to check if the pattern matches the whole string and then act accordingly, or use if (matcher.find()) to check if there is a single match or while (matcher.find()) to find multiple matches (or Matcher#results()). See Why does my regex work on RegexPlanet and regex101 but not in my code?
scala - Your regex attempts to match several lines, but you read the file line by line (e.g. use for (line <- fSource.getLines))? Read it into a single variable (see matching new line in Scala regex, when reading from file)
kotlin - You have Regex("/^\\d+$/")? Remove the outer slashes, they are regex delimiter chars that are not part of a pattern. See Find one or more word in string using Regex in Kotlin - You expect a partial string match, but .matchEntire requires a full string match? Use .find, see Regex doesn't match in Kotlin
mongodb - Do not enclose /.../ with single/double quotation marks, see mongodb regex doesn't work
c++ - regex_match requires a full string match, use regex_search to find a partial match - Regex not working as expected with C++ regex_match - regex_search finds the first match only. Use sregex_token_iterator or sregex_iterator to get all matches: see What does std::match_results::size return? - When you read a user-defined string using std::string input; std::cin >> input;, note that cin will only get to the first whitespace, to read the whole line properly, use std::getline(std::cin, input); - C++ Regex to match '+' quantifier - "\d" does not work, you need to use "\\d" or R"(\d)" (a raw string literal) - This regex doesn't work in c++ - Make sure the regex is tested against a literal text, not a string literal, see Regex_search c++
go - Double backslashes or use a raw string literal: Regular expression doesn't work in Go - Go regex does not support lookarounds, select the right option (Go) at regex101.com before testing! Regex expression negated set not working golang
groovy - Return all matches: Regex that works on regex101 does not work in Groovy
r - Double escape backslashes in the string literal: "'\w' is an unrecognized escape" in grep - Use perl=TRUE to PCRE engine ((g)sub/(g)regexpr): Why is this regex using lookbehinds invalid in R?
oracle - Greediness of all quantifiers is set by the first quantifier in the regex, see Regex101 vs Oracle Regex (then, you need to make all the quantifiers as greedy as the first one)] - \b does not work? Oracle regex does not support word boundaries at all, use workarounds as shown in Regex matching works on regex tester but not in oracle
firebase - Double escape backslashes, make sure ^ only appears at the start of the pattern and $ is located only at the end (if any), and note you cannot use more than 9 inline backreferences: Firebase Rules Regex Birthday
firebasegoogle-cloud-firestore - In Firestore security rules, the regular expression needs to be passed as a string, which also means it shouldn't be wrapped in / symbols, i.e. use allow create: if docId.matches("^\\d+$").... See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63243300
google-data-studio - /pattern/g in REGEXP_REPLACE must contain no / regex delimiters and flags (like g) - see How to use Regex to replace square brackets from date field in Google Data Studio?
google-sheets - If you think REGEXEXTRACT does not return full matches, truncates the results, you should check if you have redundant capturing groups in your regex and remove them, or convert the capturing groups to non-capturing by add ?: after the opening (, see Extract url domain root in Google Sheet
sed - Why does my regular expression work in X but not in Y?
word-boundarypcrephp - [[:<:]] and [[:>:]] do not work in the regex tester, although they are valid constructs in PCRE, see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48670105
snowflake-cloud-data-platform snowflake-sql - If you are writing a stored procedure, and \\d does not work, you need to double them again and use \\\\d, see REGEX conversion of VARCHAR value to DATE in Snowflake stored procedure using RLIKE not consistent.

The value of regex match groups remain empty [duplicate]

My regex pattern looks something like
<xxxx location="file path/level1/level2" xxxx some="xxx">
I am only interested in the part in quotes assigned to location. Shouldn't it be as easy as below without the greedy switch?
/.*location="(.*)".*/
Does not seem to work.

You need to make your regular expression lazy/non-greedy, because by default, "(.*)" will match all of "file path/level1/level2" xxx some="xxx".
Instead you can make your dot-star non-greedy, which will make it match as few characters as possible:
/location="(.*?)"/
Adding a ? on a quantifier (?, * or +) makes it non-greedy.
Note: this is only available in regex engines which implement the Perl 5 extensions (Java, Ruby, Python, etc) but not in "traditional" regex engines (including Awk, sed, grep without -P, etc.).

location="(.*)" will match from the " after location= until the " after some="xxx unless you make it non-greedy.
So you either need .*? (i.e. make it non-greedy by adding ?) or better replace .* with [^"]*.
[^"] Matches any character except for a " <quotation-mark>
More generic: [^abc] - Matches any character except for an a, b or c

How about
.*location="([^"]*)".*
This avoids the unlimited search with .* and will match exactly to the first quote.

Use non-greedy matching, if your engine supports it. Add the ? inside the capture.
/location="(.*?)"/

Use of Lazy quantifiers ? with no global flag is the answer.
Eg,
If you had global flag /g then, it would have matched all the lowest length matches as below.

Here's another way.
Here's the one you want. This is lazy [\s\S]*?
The first item:
[\s\S]*?(?:location="[^"]*")[\s\S]* Replace with: $1
Explaination: https://regex101.com/r/ZcqcUm/2
For completeness, this gets the last one. This is greedy [\s\S]*
The last item:[\s\S]*(?:location="([^"]*)")[\s\S]*
Replace with: $1
Explaination: https://regex101.com/r/LXSPDp/3
There's only 1 difference between these two regular expressions and that is the ?

The other answers here fail to spell out a full solution for regex versions which don't support non-greedy matching. The greedy quantifiers (.*?, .+? etc) are a Perl 5 extension which isn't supported in traditional regular expressions.
If your stopping condition is a single character, the solution is easy; instead of
a(.*?)b
you can match
a[^ab]*b
i.e specify a character class which excludes the starting and ending delimiiters.
In the more general case, you can painstakingly construct an expression like
start(|[^e]|e(|[^n]|n(|[^d])))end
to capture a match between start and the first occurrence of end. Notice how the subexpression with nested parentheses spells out a number of alternatives which between them allow e only if it isn't followed by nd and so forth, and also take care to cover the empty string as one alternative which doesn't match whatever is disallowed at that particular point.
Of course, the correct approach in most cases is to use a proper parser for the format you are trying to parse, but sometimes, maybe one isn't available, or maybe the specialized tool you are using is insisting on a regular expression and nothing else.

Because you are using quantified subpattern and as descried in Perl Doc,
By default, a quantified subpattern is "greedy", that is, it will
match as many times as possible (given a particular starting location)
while still allowing the rest of the pattern to match. If you want it
to match the minimum number of times possible, follow the quantifier
with a "?" . Note that the meanings don't change, just the
"greediness":
*? //Match 0 or more times, not greedily (minimum matches)
+? //Match 1 or more times, not greedily
Thus, to allow your quantified pattern to make minimum match, follow it by ? :
/location="(.*?)"/

import regex
text = 'ask her to call Mary back when she comes back'
p = r'(?i)(?s)call(.*?)back'
for match in regex.finditer(p, str(text)):
print (match.group(1))
Output:
Mary

RegEx different substitutions based on groups?

So I'm relatively n00bish at regular expressions, and doing a little practicing.
I'm playing with a dog-simple "deobfucator" that just looks for [dot] or (dot) or [at] or (at). Case-insensitive, and with or w/out any number of spaces before or after the match(s).
This is for the usual: someemail [AT] domain (dot) com type of thing. I want to obviously turn it into someemail#domain.com.
The RegEx I've come up with does the matching fine, but now I want to replace with either a . or a # depending on the match.
i.e.
I want the group matching the "dot" group to replace it with the literal ., and the group matching the "at" group with the literal #.
I know I could just write 2 different (almost identical) RegEx's and run it through both, but for the sake of education, I'm trying to see if I can do it all in one RegEx?
Here's the RegEx I came up with (probably not the smallest possible, which I'd also be interested in seeing):
+(\[|\()(dot)(\)|\]) +| +(\[|\()(at)(\)|\]) +
NOTE: before each + there's an empty space, for matching spaces.
What I'm looking for is what I would use to do the replacement(s) properly?
Update: Sorry all, forgot to add which language I was working with for this. In this case, I'm using a clipboard utility that can run RegEx's on it's input (whatever gets copied to the clipboard), and the engine it uses is C#/VB.NET. Ultimate goal for this little project is to just be able to copy an "obfuscated" email address or URL, and run the RegEx on it so that it's set on the clipboard in it's "unobfuscated" state.
That said, I do tend to use RegEx's on many different languages, so converting them between languages generally isn't an issue.

.NET regex does not support conditional replacement patterns.
for the sake of education, I'm trying to see if I can do it all in one RegEx?
There are other regex engines that allow conditional replacement logic in a single regex replacement operation with conditional replacement patterns.
There are 3 engines that support this type of replacements: JGsoft V2, Boost, and PCRE2.
For conditionals to work in Boost, you need to pass regex_constants::format_all to regex_replace. For them to work in PCRE2, you need to pass PCRE2_SUBSTITUTE_EXTENDED to pcre2_substitute.
In PCRE2:
${1:+matched:unmatched} where 1 is a number between 1 and 99 referencing a numbered capturing group. If your regex contains named capturing groups then you can reference them in a conditional by their name: ${name:+matched:unmatched}.
If you want a literal colon in the matched part, then you need to escape it with a backslash. If you want a literal closing curly brace anywhere in the conditional, then you need to escape that with a backslash too. Plus signs have no special meaning beyond the :+ that starts the conditional, so they don't need to be escaped.
Also, see The Boost-Specific Format Sequences:
When specifying the format_all flag to regex_replace(), the escape sequences recognized are the same as those above for format_perl. In addition, conditional expressions of the following form are recognized:
?Ntrue-expression:false-expression
where N is a decimal digit representing a sub-match. If the corresponding sub-match participated in the full match, then the substitution is true-expression. Otherwise, it is false-expression. In this mode, you can use parens () for grouping. If you want a literal paren, you must escape it as \(.
In Boost replacement patterns, literal ( and ) must be escaped.
The syntax for JGsoft V2 replacement string conditionals is the same as that in the C++ Boost library.
So, your regex can be contracted to ( +)[[(](?:(dot)|(at))[])]( +):
( +) - Group 1: one or more spaces
[[(] - a [ or (
(?:(dot)|(at)) - Either (Group 2) a dot substring or (Group 3) an at substring
[])] - a ) or ]
( +) - Group 4: one or more spaces
And replace with $1(?{3}.:#)$4:
$1 - Group 1 value,
(?{3}.:#) - if Group 3 matched, replace with ., else with #
$4 - Group 4 value.
This is available in Notepad++:

If you are using Java, try replaceAll method from String class.
And finally you need to normalize it with white spaces:
- Pure Java - String after = before.trim().replaceAll("\\s+", " ");
- Pure Java - String after = before.replaceAll("\\s{2,}", " ").trim();
- Apache commons lang3 - String after = StringUtils.normalizeSpace(String str);
- ...

Why does this regex work in JavaScript, but not C#?

Expression
var regex = new Regex(#"{([A-z]*)(([^]|:)((\\:)|[^:])*?)(([^]|:)((\\:)|[^:])*?)}");
Breakdown
The expression is [crudely] designed to find tokens within an input, using the format: {name[:pattern[:format]]}, where the pattern and format are optional.
{
([A-z]*) // name
(([^]|:)((\\:)|[^:])*?) // regex pattern
(([^]|:)((\\:)|[^:])*?) // format
}
Additionally, the expression attempts to ignore escaped colons, thus allowing for strings such as {Time:\d+\:\d+\:\d+:hh\:mm\:ss}
Question
When testing on RegExr.com, everything works sufficiently, however when attempting the same pattern in C#, the input fails to match, why?
(Any advice for general improvements to the expression are very welcome too)

The [^] pattern is only valid in JavaScript where it matches a not nothing, i.e. any character (although in ES5, it does not match the chars from outside the BMP plane). In C#, it is easy to match any char with . and passing the RegexOptions.Singleline modifier. However, in JS, the modifier is not supported, but you may match any char with [\s\S] workaround pattern.
So, the minimum change you need to make to make both compatible in both regex flavors is to change ([^]|:) to [\s\S] because there is no need to use a : as an alternative (since [\s\S] will already match a colon).
Also, do not use [A-z] as a shortcut to match ASCII letters. Either use [a-zA-Z] or [a-z] and pass a case insensitive modifier.
So, you might consider writing the expression as
{([A-Za-z]*)([\s\S]((\\:)|[^:])*?)([\s\S]((\\:)|[^:])*?)}
See a .NET regex test and a JS regex test.
Surely, there may be other enhancements here: remove redundant groups, add support for any escape sequences (not just escaped colons), etc., but it is out of the question scope.

Regex match certain string and ignore if it starts with some pattern

I have a following regular expression that I use in C# code that tries to match save some followed by some word and delete some followed by some word in a file.
\bsave\ssome\b\s[^\s]+|\bdelete\ssome\b\s[^\s]+
This works as expected. Now, I wanted to exclude those from the match that has a pattern like - save some and - delete some.
I tried using the following but it didn't work. In the expression below I just used the expression to ignore - save some Appreciate any help.
(?!-\s\bsave\ssome\b\s[^\s])(\bsave\ssome\b\s[^\s]+|\bdelete\ssome\b\s[^\s]+)
The demo is here

You need to use a negative look-behind and group the pattern:
(?<!-\p{Zs}*)(?:\bsave\ssome\b\s[^\s]+|\bdelete\ssome\b\s[^\s]+)
^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ ^
See regex demo
The (?<!-\p{Zs}*) lookbehind fails a match if the save/delete some is preceded with - followed by zero or more spaces (use + if there must be at least one). I used \p{Zs} to only match horizontal whitespace. If you want to match newlines, use \s.
A contracted regex version:
(?<!-\s*)\b(save|delete)\ssome\b\s\S+
Use the Explicit Capture flag with it. Since \ssome\b\s\S+ is common for both alternatives, you can move the end of the group to just include save and delete.
C#:
var rx = #"(?<!-\s*)\b(save|delete)\ssome\b\s\S+";