CODE UPDATED TO REFLECT ANSWER: SAME PROBLEM STILL OCCURS
This class is supposed to run all tasks in the list, sleep and then wake up and repeat the process infinitely. For some reason though, after the first sleep, the sleepThread.RunWorkerAsync() call gets called twice for some reason. I can obviously solve this by:
if (!sleepThread.IsBusy) { sleepThread.RunWorkerAsync(); }
but that feels like a work around.
Here is the main routine class:
public class ServiceRoutine
{
private static volatile ServiceRoutine instance;
private static object instanceLock = new object();
private static object listLock = new object();
private static readonly List<Task> taskList = new List<Task>()
{
new UpdateWaferQueueTask(),
new UpdateCommentsTask(),
new UpdateFromTestDataTask(),
new UpdateFromTestStationLogsTask(),
new UpdateFromWatchmanLogsTask(),
new UpdateStationsStatusTask()
};
private List<Task> runningTasks;
private BackgroundWorker sleepThread;
private Logger log;
private ServiceRoutine()
{
log = new Logger();
runningTasks = new List<Task>();
sleepThread = new BackgroundWorker();
sleepThread.WorkerReportsProgress = false;
sleepThread.WorkerSupportsCancellation = false;
sleepThread.DoWork += (sender, e) =>
{
int sleepTime = ConfigReader.Instance.GetSleepTime();
log.Log(Logger.LogType.Info,
"service sleeping for " + sleepTime / 1000 + " seconds");
Thread.Sleep(sleepTime);
};
sleepThread.RunWorkerCompleted += (sender, e) => { Run(); };
}
public static ServiceRoutine Instance
{
get
{
if (instance == null)
{
lock (instanceLock)
{
if (instance == null)
{
instance = new ServiceRoutine();
}
}
}
return instance;
}
}
public void Run()
{
foreach (Task task in taskList)
{
lock (listLock)
{
runningTasks.Add(task);
task.TaskComplete += (completedTask) =>
{
runningTasks.Remove(completedTask);
if (runningTasks.Count <= 0)
{
sleepThread.RunWorkerAsync();
}
};
task.Execute();
}
}
}
}
this is called like this:
ServiceRoutine.Instance.Run();
from the service start method. Here is the Task class as well:
public abstract class Task
{
private Logger log;
protected BackgroundWorker thread;
public delegate void TaskPointer(Task task);
public TaskPointer TaskComplete;
public Task()
{
log = new Logger();
thread = new BackgroundWorker();
thread.WorkerReportsProgress = false;
thread.DoWork += WorkLoad;
thread.RunWorkerCompleted += FinalizeTask;
}
protected abstract string Name { get; }
protected abstract void WorkLoad(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e);
private string GetInnerMostException(Exception ex)
{
string innerMostExceptionMessage = string.Empty;
if (ex.InnerException == null) { innerMostExceptionMessage = ex.Message; }
else
{
while (ex.InnerException != null)
{
innerMostExceptionMessage = ex.InnerException.Message;
}
}
return innerMostExceptionMessage;
}
protected void FinalizeTask(object sender, RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
{
try
{
if (e.Error != null)
{
string errorMessage = GetInnerMostException(e.Error);
log.Log(Logger.LogType.Error, this.Name + " failed: " + errorMessage);
}
else
{
log.Log(Logger.LogType.Info, "command complete: " + this.Name);
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
string errorMessage = GetInnerMostException(ex);
log.Log(Logger.LogType.Error, this.Name + " failed: " + errorMessage);
}
finally { TaskComplete(this); }
}
public void Execute()
{
log.Log(Logger.LogType.Info, "starting: " + this.Name);
thread.RunWorkerAsync();
}
}
The question is, why is sleepThread.RunWorkerAsync() getting called twice and is there a better way to get this work without checking if the thread is busy before calling it?
You are facing a race condition here. The problem is in the TaskComplete callback. Last two tasks remove themselves from the runningTasks list before executing the if condition. When it is executed, the list count is zero. You should lock the list before changing its. The lock needs to be taken in the TaskComplete callback:
runningTasks.Add(task);
task.TaskComplete += (completedTask) =>
{
lock (runningTasks)
{
runningTasks.Remove(completedTask);
if (runningTasks.Count <= 0)
{
sleepThread.RunWorkerAsync();
}
}
};
task.Execute();
SOLVED
I tried several different locking techniques on the runningTasks list but nothing worked. After changing runningTasks to a BlockingCollection, everything worked perfectly.
Here is the new add/remove implementation using a BlockingCollection instead of a List:
foreach (Task task in taskList)
{
runningTasks.Add(task);
task.TaskComplete += (completedTask) =>
{
runningTasks.TryTake(out completedTask);
if (runningTasks.Count <= 0 && completedTask != null)
{
sleepThread.RunWorkerAsync();
}
};
task.Execute();
}
Related
Here in the below code I want to stop the thread which is created in StartInvokeExplorer function. Also the starter function in the StartInvokeExplorer is a keyhook function.
public void InvokeExplorerStart_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
Automate.IsInvokeExplorerClicked = true;
if (InvokeExplorer.Content.Equals("InvokeExplorerStart"))
{
InvokeExplorer.Content = "InvokeExplorerStop";
StartInvokeExplorer();
//InvokeExplorer.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(new InvokeExplorerDelegate(StartInvokeExplorer));
}
else
{
InvokeExplorer.Content = "InvokeExplorerStart";
StopInvokeExplorer();
}
}
public void StartInvokeExplorer()
{
if (XmlDataGrid.SelectedCells.Count > 0)
{
StartupCount = 1;
thread = new Thread(() =>
{
Starter(StartupCount);
});
thread.IsBackground = true;
thread.Start();
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("Please select the recorded row to fetch the new data ");
InvokeExplorer.Content = "InvokeExplorerStart";
}
}
private void Starter(int cnt)
{
try
{
if (cnt > 0)
{
Hook.GlobalEvents().MouseClick += (sender, e) =>
{
if (e.Button == MouseButtons.Left)
{
Automate.Show(e);
}
};
Hook.GlobalEvents().MouseDoubleClick += (sender, e) =>
{
Automate.IsDoubleClick = true;
Automate.Show(e);
Automate.IsDoubleClick = false;
};
System.Windows.Forms.Application.Run(new ApplicationContext());
}
else
{
Hook.GlobalEvents().Dispose();
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
ErrorLog.Log(ex);
}
}
As from what I have understand, you want to stop the running thread.
This is how.
First, you need to create some stop logic. In your case, it would be some variable, like:
bool threadShouldRun;
and then inside your thread function, you should create a loop like:
void MyThreadFunc()
{
while(threadShouldRun)
{
threadWork();
Thread.Sleep(100);
}
}
When you want to stop the thread, just set your threadShouldRun variable to false.
Sleep is needed here. Without this, thread may use 100% of processor core.
You can use an AutoResetEvent in conjunction with a CancellationToken. Something along the line of (code not tested)
CancellationTokenSource cts;
AutoResetEvent autoResetEvent;
Thread thread;
public void ThreadStart()
{
cts = new CancellationTokenSource();
autoResetEvent = new AutoResetEvent();
thread = new Thread(new ParameterizedThreadStart(ThreadJob));
thread.Start(cts.Token);
}
public void ThreadStop()
{
cts?.Cancel();
thread?.Join();
cts?.Dispose();
autoResetEvent?.Dispose();
}
public static void ThreadJob(object obj)
{
var ct = (CancellationToken)obj;
while (!ct.IsCancellationRequested)
{
if(WaitHandle.WaitAny(new[] { tc.WaitHandle, autoResetEvent}) == 1)
{
// Do your stuff
}
}
}
public void PerformJobInThread()
{
autoResetEvent?.Set();
}
This way your thread will run until you call the ThreadStop method (actually, until you cancel your CancellationTokenSource) but you can still control when to "enable" it.
Is it my queue mechanism thread safe? I just wonder if I need concurrent collections. Need I lock Enqueue method? Console displays queue count in incorrect order, Does it affect on maxQueueCount at Load method? Can I improve it in some way? I want queue with a maximum size, and I don't want the same item to be enqueued again.
I have many database sources with stored procedures which select documents. Each document has a unique Id but may be contained in many data sources. So I need to check if the document with the specified ID is processed in my data flow or not. I don't want to clogged my queue so If queue count equals = 1000 I don't want to enqueue new documents.
using System;
using System.Collections.Concurrent;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Timers;
class Program
{
public class Document : IItem
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
}
static void Main()
{
var queueProvider = new Provider();
var docs = new List<IItem>
{
new Document { Id = Guid.NewGuid() },
new Document { Id = Guid.NewGuid() },
new Document { Id = Guid.NewGuid() },
new Document { Id = Guid.NewGuid() },
new Document { Id = Guid.NewGuid() }
};
try
{
var tasks = new List<Task>();
var task1 = Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
var timer1 = new Timer(1000) { Interval = 1000 };
timer1.Elapsed += (object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e) =>
{
queueProvider.Load(docs, 1);
};
timer1.Enabled = true;
timer1.Start();
});
tasks.Add(task1);
var task2 = Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
var timer1 = new Timer(1000) { Interval = 1000 };
timer1.Elapsed += (object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e) =>
{
queueProvider.Load(docs, 2);
};
timer1.Enabled = true;
timer1.Start();
});
tasks.Add(task2);
//Dequeue
//var task3 = Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
//{
// var timer1 = new Timer(3000) { Interval = 1000 };
// timer1.Elapsed += (object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e) =>
// {
// queueProvider.Dequeue();
// };
// timer1.Enabled = true;
// timer1.Start();
//});
//tasks.Add(task3);
Task.WaitAll(tasks.ToArray());
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Console.WriteLine(e);
}
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
public interface IItem
{
Guid Id { get; set; }
}
public interface IProvider
{
void Enqueue(IItem feedingItem, int id);
}
public class Provider : IProvider
{
private readonly ConcurrentQueue<IItem> queue;
private readonly ConcurrentDictionary<Guid, DateTime> inputBuffor;
private readonly object locker = new object();
private int maxQueueCount = 3;
public Provider()
{
queue = new ConcurrentQueue<IItem>();
inputBuffor = new ConcurrentDictionary<Guid, DateTime>();
}
public IItem Dequeue()
{
queue.TryDequeue(out var item);
Console.WriteLine("Dequeue: " + item.Id);
return item;
}
public void Enqueue(IItem item, int id)
{
//lock (locker)
//{
if (inputBuffor.TryAdd(item.Id, DateTime.Now))
{
queue.Enqueue(item);
Console.WriteLine("Enqueue: " + item.Id + "taskId: " + id);
Console.WriteLine("Count: " + queue.Count + " Buffor: " + inputBuffor.Count);
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("Not Enqueue: " + item.Id + "taskId: " + id);
}
//}
}
public void Load(IEnumerable<IItem> data, int id)
{
foreach (var item in data)
{
if (queue.Count < maxQueueCount)
Enqueue(item, id);
}
}
}
Update
I renamed Enqueu method to TryEnqueue and added BlockingCollection instead Concurent Collection.
var task1 = Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
var timer1 = new Timer(1000) { Interval = 1000 };
timer1.Elapsed += (object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e) =>
{
foreach(var doc in docs)
{
if (queueProvider.TryEnqueue(doc, 1))
{
Console.WriteLine("Enqueue: " + doc.Id + "taskId: 2");
Console.WriteLine("Count: " + queueProvider.QueueCount + " Buffor: " + queueProvider.BufforCount);
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("Not Enqueue: " + doc.Id + "taskId: 2");
}
}
};
timer1.Enabled = true;
timer1.Start();
});
tasks.Add(task1);
public bool TryEnqueue(IItem item, int id)
{
if (inputBuffor.TryAdd(item.Id, DateTime.Now))
{
if (queue.TryAdd(item))
{
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
public IItem Dequeue()
{
queue.TryTake(out var item);
return item;
}
Multiple threads could both satisfy queue.Count < maxQueueCount (at the same time) and then each thread would run your Enqueue method and push past your maxQueueCount. That is definitely not thread safe. I’d move that check into your EnqueueMethod and surround it with a lock.
I have a method that send some SMS to our customers that look like below:
public void ProccessSmsQueue()
{
SmsDbContext context = new SmsDbContext();
ISmsProvider provider = new ZenviaProvider();
SmsManager manager = new SmsManager(context, provider);
try
{
manager.ProcessQueue();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
EventLog.WriteEntry(ex.Message, EventLogEntryType.Error);
}
finally
{
context.Dispose();
}
}
protected override void OnStart(string[] args)
{
Task.Factory.StartNew(DoWork).ContinueWith( ??? )
}
So, I have some issues:
I don´t know how long it takes for the method run;
The method can throw exceptions, that I want to write on EventLog
I want to run this method in loop, every 10 min, but only after last execution finish.
How I can achieve this? I thought about using ContinueWith(), but I still have questions on how to build the entire logic.
You should have an async method that accepts a CancellationToken so it knows when to stop, calls ProccessSmsQueue in a try-catch block and uses Task.Delay to asynchronously wait until the next time it needs to run:
public async Task DoWorkAsync(CancellationToken token)
{
while (true)
{
try
{
ProccessSmsQueue();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
// Handle exception
}
await Task.Delay(TimeSpan.FromMinutes(10), token);
}
}
You can call this method when your application starts and Task.Wait the returned task before existing so you know it completes and has no exceptions:
private Task _proccessSmsQueueTask;
private CancellationTokenSource _cancellationTokenSource;
protected override void OnStart(string[] args)
{
_cancellationTokenSource = new CancellationTokenSource();
_proccessSmsQueueTask = Task.Run(() => DoWorkAsync(_cancellationTokenSource.Token));
}
protected override void OnStop()
{
_cancellationTokenSource.Cancel();
try
{
_proccessSmsQueueTask.Wait();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
// handle exeption
}
}
Sample Worker Class that I have used in Windows Services. It supports stopping in a 'clean' way by using a lock.
You just have to add your code in DoWork, set your timer in the StartTimerAndWork method (in milliseconds), and use this class in your service.
public class TempWorker
{
private System.Timers.Timer _timer = new System.Timers.Timer();
private Thread _thread = null;
private object _workerStopRequestedLock = new object();
private bool _workerStopRequested = false;
private object _loopInProgressLock = new object();
private bool _loopInProgress = false;
bool LoopInProgress
{
get
{
bool rez = true;
lock (_loopInProgressLock)
rez = _loopInProgress;
return rez;
}
set
{
lock (_loopInProgressLock)
_loopInProgress = value;
}
}
#region constructors
public TempWorker()
{
}
#endregion
#region public methods
public void StartWorker()
{
lock (_workerStopRequestedLock)
{
this._workerStopRequested = false;
}
_thread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(StartTimerAndWork));
_thread.Start();
}
public void StopWorker()
{
if (this._thread == null)
return;
lock (_workerStopRequestedLock)
this._workerStopRequested = true;
int iter = 0;
while (LoopInProgress)
{
Thread.Sleep(100);
iter++;
if (iter == 60)
{
_thread.Abort();
}
}
//if (!_thread.Join(60000))
// _thread.Abort();
}
#endregion
#region private methods
private void StartTimerAndWork()
{
this._timer.Elapsed += new ElapsedEventHandler(timer_Elapsed);
this._timer.Interval = 10000;//milliseconds
this._timer.Enabled = true;
this._timer.Start();
}
#endregion
#region event handlers
private void timer_Elapsed(object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e)
{
if (!LoopInProgress)
{
lock (_workerStopRequestedLock)
{
if (this._workerStopRequested)
{
this._timer.Stop();
return;
}
}
DoWork();
}
}
private void DoWork()
{
try
{
this.LoopInProgress = true;
//DO WORK HERE
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
//LOG EXCEPTION HERE
}
finally
{
this.LoopInProgress = false;
}
}
#endregion
}
I want to know how to stop and restart a thread.
I create N amount of threads, depending on conditions returned from a database. These are long running processes which should never stop but should I get a critical error within the thread I want to completely kill the thread and start it up like new.
The code which I use currently to start the threads:
foreach (MobileAccounts MobileAccount in ReceiverAccounts)
{
Receiver rec = new Receiver();
ThreadStart starterParameters = delegate { rec.StartListener(MobileAccount); };
Thread FeedbackThread = new Thread(starterParameters);
FeedbackThread.Name = MobileAccount.FriendlyName;
FeedbackThread.Start();
Thread.Sleep(1000);
}
You can write your own listener and manage its thread within it.
something like:
public class AccountListener
{
private Thread _worker = null;
private MobileAccount _mobileAccount;
public AccountListener(MobileAccount mobileAccount)
{
_mobileAccount = mobileAccount;
}
protected void Listen()
{
try
{
DoWork();
}
catch (Exception exc)
{
}
}
protected virtual void DoWork()
{
Console.WriteLine(_mobileAccount);
}
public void Start()
{
if (_worker == null)
{
_worker = new Thread(Listen);
}
_worker.Start();
}
public void Stop()
{
try
{
_worker.Abort();
}
catch (Exception)
{
//thrad abort exception
}
finally
{
_worker = null;
}
}
}
copy paste the following code in new C# console app.
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var enumerator = new QueuedEnumerator<long>();
var listenerWaitHandle = Listener(enumerator);
Publisher(enumerator);
listenerWaitHandle.WaitOne();
}
private static AutoResetEvent Listener(IEnumerator<long> items)
{
var #event = new AutoResetEvent(false);
ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem((o) =>
{
while (items.MoveNext())
{
Console.WriteLine("Received : " + items.Current);
Thread.Sleep(2 * 1000);
}
(o as AutoResetEvent).Set();
}, #event);
return #event;
}
private static void Publisher(QueuedEnumerator<long> enumerator)
{
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
enumerator.Set(i);
Console.WriteLine("Sended : " + i);
Thread.Sleep(1 * 1000);
}
enumerator.Finish();
}
class QueuedEnumerator<T> : IEnumerator<T>
{
private Queue _internal = Queue.Synchronized(new Queue());
private T _current;
private bool _finished;
private AutoResetEvent _setted = new AutoResetEvent(false);
public void Finish()
{
_finished = true;
_setted.Set();
}
public void Set(T item)
{
if (_internal.Count > 3)
{
Console.WriteLine("I'm full, give the listener some slack !");
Thread.Sleep(3 * 1000);
Set(item);
}
else
{
_internal.Enqueue(item);
_setted.Set();
}
}
public T Current
{
get { return _current; }
}
public void Dispose()
{
}
object System.Collections.IEnumerator.Current
{
get { return _current; }
}
public bool MoveNext()
{
if (_finished && _internal.Count == 0)
return false;
else if (_internal.Count > 0)
{
_current = (T)_internal.Dequeue();
return true;
}
else
{
_setted.WaitOne();
return MoveNext();
}
}
public void Reset()
{
}
}
}
2 threads (A,B)
A thread can provide one instance at a time and calls the Set method
B thread wants to receive a sequence of instances (provided by thread A)
So literally transforming an Add(item), Add(item), .. to a IEnumerable between different threads
Other solutions also welcome of course!
Sure - this code might not be the best way to do it, but here was my initial stab at it:
Subject<Item> toAddObservable;
ListObservable<Item> buffer;
void Init()
{
// Subjects are an IObservable we can trigger by-hand, they're the
// mutable variables of Rx
toAddObservable = new Subject(Scheduler.TaskPool);
// ListObservable will hold all our items until someone asks for them
// It will yield exactly *one* item, but only when toAddObservable
// is completed.
buffer = new ListObservable<Item>(toAddObservable);
}
void Add(Item to_add)
{
lock (this) {
// Subjects themselves are thread-safe, but we still need the lock
// to protect against the reset in FetchResults
ToAddOnAnotherThread.OnNext(to_add);
}
}
IEnumerable<Item> FetchResults()
{
IEnumerable<Item> ret = null;
buffer.Subscribe(x => ret = x);
lock (this) {
toAddObservable.OnCompleted();
Init(); // Recreate everything
}
return ret;
}