EF filtered include - many child entities - c#

Having some issues with filtering child entities.
I know that EF doesn't support filtered includes but I can't get any other alternative to work either.
var q = from sWithA in
(from s in db.Svs
where s.Env.UID.Equals(env)
select new
{
Svs= s,
Cons= from c in s.Cons
where c.Apps.Any(a => a.AppT.Type.Equals(appT))
select c
}).AsEnumerable()
select sWithA.Svs;
List<Svs> svsList = q.ToList();
This actually generates a SQL query which returns the information I need, but the child entities aren't being attached to the parent.
svsList contains two Svs objects but the child collection (Cons) is empty.
Svs < many-to-many > Cons < many to one > Apps
Any ideas?

The relationship fixup trick that you apparently try to exploit doesn't work for many-to-many relationships, only for one-to-one and one-to-many relationships. For many-to-many relationships you have to fixup the navigation collections manually, for example like so:
List<Svs> svsList = (from s in db.Svs
where s.Env.UID.Equals(env)
select new
{
Svs = s,
Cons = from c in s.Cons
where c.Apps.Any(a => a.AppT.Type.Equals(appT))
select c
})
.AsEnumerable()
.Select(sWithA =>
{
sWithA.Svs.Cons = sWithA.Cons.ToList();
return sWithA.Svs;
})
.ToList();
Yes, it's ugly and looking at this code one really misses the filtered Include support.

Related

LINQ: Is there a way to combine these queries into one?

I have a database that contains 3 tables:
Phones
PhoneListings
PhoneConditions
PhoneListings has a FK from the Phones table(PhoneID), and a FK from the Phone Conditions table(conditionID)
I am working on a function that adds a Phone Listing to the user's cart, and returns all of the necessary information for the user. The phone make and model are contained in the PHONES table, and the details about the Condition are contained in the PhoneConditions table.
Currently I am using 3 queries to obtain all the neccesary information. Is there a way to combine all of this into one query?
public ActionResult phoneAdd(int listingID, int qty)
{
ShoppingBasket myBasket = new ShoppingBasket();
string BasketID = myBasket.GetBasketID(this.HttpContext);
var PhoneListingQuery = (from x in myDB.phoneListings
where x.phonelistingID == listingID
select x).Single();
var PhoneCondition = myDB.phoneConditions
.Where(x => x.conditionID == PhoneListingQuery.phonelistingID).Single();
var PhoneDataQuery = (from ph in myDB.Phones
where ph.PhoneID == PhoneListingQuery.phonePageID
select ph).SingleOrDefault();
}
You could project the result into an anonymous class, or a Tuple, or even a custom shaped entity in a single line, however the overall database performance might not be any better:
var phoneObjects = myDB.phoneListings
.Where(pl => pl.phonelistingID == listingID)
.Select(pl => new
{
PhoneListingQuery = pl,
PhoneCondition = myDB.phoneConditions
.Single(pc => pc.conditionID == pl.phonelistingID),
PhoneDataQuery = myDB.Phones
.SingleOrDefault(ph => ph.PhoneID == pl.phonePageID)
})
.Single();
// Access phoneObjects.PhoneListingQuery / PhoneCondition / PhoneDataQuery as needed
There are also slightly more compact overloads of the LINQ Single and SingleOrDefault extensions which take a predicate as a parameter, which will help reduce the code slightly.
Edit
As an alternative to multiple retrievals from the ORM DbContext, or doing explicit manual Joins, if you set up navigation relationships between entities in your model via the navigable join keys (usually the Foreign Keys in the underlying tables), you can specify the depth of fetch with an eager load, using Include:
var phoneListingWithAssociations = myDB.phoneListings
.Include(pl => pl.PhoneConditions)
.Include(pl => pl.Phones)
.Single(pl => pl.phonelistingID == listingID);
Which will return the entity graph in phoneListingWithAssociations
(Assuming foreign keys PhoneListing.phonePageID => Phones.phoneId and
PhoneCondition.conditionID => PhoneListing.phonelistingID)
You should be able to pull it all in one query with join, I think.
But as pointed out you might not achieve alot of speed from this, as you are just picking the first match and then moving on, not really doing any inner comparisons.
If you know there exist atleast one data point in each table then you might aswell pull all at the same time. if not then waiting with the "sub queries" is nice as done by StuartLC.
var Phone = (from a in myDB.phoneListings
join b in myDB.phoneConditions on a.phonelistingID equals b.conditionID
join c in ph in myDB.Phones on a.phonePageID equals c.PhoneID
where
a.phonelistingID == listingID
select new {
Listing = a,
Condition = b,
Data = c
}).FirstOrDefault();
FirstOrDefault because single throws error if there exists more than one element.

EF4: Joining Entity Query on IEnumerable list of objects

I have two IEnumerables:
IEnumerable<ThisEmployee> thisEmployees;
IEnumerable<ThatEmployee> thatEmployees;
They are populated from 2 separate contexts. ThisEmployee and ThatEmployee are not matching types. They don't share anything similar apart from an EmployeeNumber property.
I want to get all ThatEmployee.Notes for any employee in thatEmployees that has a matching EmployeeNumber in thisEmployees.
I can't for the life of me work out how.
Your collections come from different contexts so get ids of employees first in linq-to-objects:
var ids = from e1 in thatEmployees
join e2 in thisEmployees on e1.EmployeeNumber equals e2.EmployeeNumber
select e1.Id;
Now use ids to get Notes from the database in single query
var notes = from n in context.Notes
where ids.Contains(n.Employee.Id)
select n;
Since its in two different contexts try using ToList to get all objects. Then using Linq to Objects u can use Where(r => thisEmployees.Any(s => s.EmployeeNumber == r.EmployeeNumber)). Not sure if i understood u correctly :)
How about something like:
var notes = thatEmployees
.Join(thisEmployees,
ta => ta.EmployeeNumber,
ti => ti.EmployeeNumber,
(ta, ti) => ta.Notes)

Linq to entities and Hierarchical table

I have a table with id and parentId columns the nesting level is just 1(for now).
Right now I load items like this:
using (KEntities ctx = new KEntities())
{
ctx.KSet.MergeOption = MergeOption.NoTracking;
var items = (from c in ctx.KSet
where c.ParentId == 0
select new
{
Title = c.Title,
Id = c.Id,
Subs = ctx.KSet.Where(o => o.ParentId == c.Id)
}).ToList();
}
The other option that I can choose is to set self-reference on the table, so the entity will expose self-navigation properties and then I can use Load() to load the children (lazy loading?).
Which approach is preferred and why?
IMHO, I prefer what you have done as in your example. I like to call the .ToList() cause then I know at that moment I have the data in memory, and don't have to worry about some of the problems you can have with Lazy loading.
"it leaks persistent storage access to different tiers via the lazy loadable associations."
taken from link
The valid option is exposing navigation property Children and calling:
var items = ctx.KSet.Include("Children").Where(c => c.ParentId == 0);
This will allow you working directly with KSet entities. Projection will create a new type. In case of exposing navigation property you also have the choice of using eager loading (as shown in the example) or explicit / lazy loading if you want to. Projection make sense only if you want to filter or sort children.

Linking Multiple Tables in LINQ to SQL

I would like to get the list of albums (Distinct) which was sung by the artistId=1
I am very new to LINQ to SQL and do not know how to join multiple tables. Please see the database diagram below:
alt text http://a.imageshack.us/img155/8572/13690801.jpg
SingBy is the middle table between Track and Artist.
How could I achieve this?
var albums = from singer in artist
from sb in singby
from t in track
from a in album
where singer.artistId == 1 &&
sb.artistId == 1 &&
sb.trackId == t.trackId &&
a.albumId == track.albumId
select a;
I'm sure there must be a better way. You should look into creating Navigation Properties on your entities. Navigation Properties are like foreign keys.
Edit - corrected to get albums, not artists.
Now, I wrote the codes like the following and it works.
var albums = (from a in db.artists
where a.artistId == 1
join sb in db.singbies on a equals sb.artist
join t in db.tracks on sb.track equals t
join al in db.albums on t.album equals al
select al).Distinct();
return albums.ToList() as List<album>;
I tested the Chad's version and it works too. I would like to know which way is better and good for query optimization? Thanks all.
If you have all the foreign key relationship defined, you should be able to issue call like below:
dc.GetTable<Album>().Where(a => a.Track.Singby.ArtistId == 1).ToList();
This is relying on Linq to perform lazy load for Track and Singby automatically when required. Obviously this is not optimal to use when you have a large set of data in the db and performance is critical. You can chain the query with GroupBy or Distinct operation to return only the distinct set such as
dc.GetTable<Album>().Where(a => a.Track.Singby.ArtistId == 1).Distinct().ToList();
I would like to get the list of albums
(Distinct) which was sung by the
artistId=1
DBDataContext = new DBDataContext();
album[] = db.artists.Where(a => a.artistId == 1) /* Your artist */
.SelectMany(a => a.singbies) /* Check if `singby` converted to `singbies` */
.Select(sb => sb.track) /* The tracks */
.Select(t => t.album) /* The albums */
.GroupBy(al => al.albumId) /* Group by id */ /* "Distinct" for objects */
.Select(alG => alG.First()) /* Select first of each group */
.ToArray();
IEnumerable<Album> query =
from album in myDC.Albums
let artists =
from track in album.Tracks
from singBy in track.SingBys
select singBy.Artist
where artists.Any(artist => artist.ArtistId == 1)
select album;
List<int> Ids = dc.Albums.Where(a => a.Track.Singby.ArtistId == 1).Select(a=> a.albumId).Distinct().ToList();
List<Album> distinctAlbums = dc.Albums.Where(a => distinctAlbumIds.Contains(a.albumId)).ToList();
Hey TTCG, above is the simplest way to do it. This is because doing a Distinct on a List of objects won't do it based on the albumId.
Either you do it in two steps as above, or, you write your own Album Comparer which specifies uniqueness based on AlbumId and pass it to the Distinct call on a List.
NOTE:
The above will only work if you've defined the constraints in your DBML, but better still in your DB.
For best practices, always define your relationships IN THE DATABASE when using Linq to SQL, as Linq to SQL is not like EF, or NHibernate, in that is does not "abstract" your db, it simply reflects it. It's a tool for Data Driven Design, not Domain Driven, so define the relationships in the db.

LINQ: Doing an order by!

i have some Linq to Entity code like so:
var tablearows = Context.TableB.Include("TableA").Where(c => c.TableBID == 1).Select(c => c.TableA).ToList();
So i'm returning the results of TableA with TableB.TableBID = 1
That's all good
Now how can I sort TableA by one of its column? There is a many to many relation ship between the two tables
I tried various ways with no look, for example
var tablearows = Context.TableB.Include("TableA").Where(c => c.TableBID == 1).Select(c => c.TableA).OrderBy(p => p.ColumnToSort).ToList();
In the above case when i type "p." i don't have access to the columns from TableA, presumably because it's a collection of TableA objects, not a single row
How about using SelectMany instead of Select :
var tablearows = Context.TableB.Include("TableB")
.Where(c => c.TableBID == 1)
.SelectMany(c => c.TableA)
.OrderBy(p => p.ColumnToSort)
.ToList();
EDIT :
The expression below returns collection of TableAs -every element of the collection is an instance of TableA collection not TableA instance- (that's why you can't get the properties of the TableA) :
var tablearows = Context.TableB.Include("TableB")
.Where(c => c.TableBID == 1)
.Select(c => c.TableA);
If we turn the Select to SelectMany, we get the result as one concatenated collection that includes elements :
var tablearows = Context.TableB.Include("TableB")
.Where(c => c.TableBID == 1)
.SelectMany(c => c.TableA);
Okay, so now I've taken on board that there's a many to many relationship, I think Canavar is right - you want a SelectMany.
Again, that's easier to see in a query expression:
var tableARows = from rowB in Context.TableB.Include("TableA")
where rowB.TableBID == 1
from rowA in rowB.TableA
orderby rowA.ColumnToSort
select rowA;
The reason it didn't work is that you've got a different result type. Previously, you were getting a type like:
List<EntitySet<TableA>>
(I don't know the exact type as I'm not a LINQ to Entities guy, but it would be something like that.)
Now we've flattened all those TableA rows into a single list:
List<TableA>
Now you can't order a sequence of sets by a single column within a row - but you can order a sequence of rows by a column. So basically your intuition in the question was right when you said "presumably because it's a collection of TableA objects, not a single row" - but it wasn't quite clear what you mean by "it".
Now, is that flattening actually appropriate for you? It means you no longer know which B contributed any particular A. Is there only actually one B involved here, so it doesn't matter? If so, there's another option which may even perform better (I really don't know, but you might like to look at the SQL generated in each case and profile it):
var tableARows = Context.TableB.Include("TableA")
.Where(b => b.TableBID == 1)
.Single()
.TableA.OrderBy(a => a.ColumnToSort)
.ToList();
Note that this will fail (or at least would in LINQ to Objects; I don't know exactly what will happen in entities) if there isn't a row in table B with an ID of 1. Basically it selects the single row, then selects all As associated with that row, and orders them.

Categories

Resources