Develop Reference

Variable 'x.Sub' of type 'SubType' referenced from scope '' but it is not defined error

Check this fiddle for the error: https://dotnetfiddle.net/tlz4Qg
I have two classes like this:
public class ParentType{
private ParentType(){}
public int Id { get; protected set; }
public SubType Sub { get; protected set; }
}
public class SubType{
private SubType(){}
public int Id { get; protected set; }
}
I am going to transform a multilevel anonymous expression to a multilevel non-anonymous expression. To achieve this I have an expression like the below-mentioned one:
x => new
{
x.Id,
Sub = new
{
x.Sub.Id
}
}
To achieve that goal, I have transformed it to an expression like this:
x => new ParentType()
{
Id = x.Id,
Sub = new SubType()
{
Id = x.Sub.Id
},
}
But when I call Compile() method, I get the following error:
Variable 'x.Sub' of type 'SubType' referenced from scope '' but it is not defined
Here is my visitor class:
public class ReturnTypeVisitor<TIn, TOut> : ExpressionVisitor
{
private readonly Type funcToReplace;
private ParameterExpression currentParameter;
private ParameterExpression defaultParameter;
private Type currentType;
public ReturnTypeVisitor() => funcToReplace = typeof(Func<,>).MakeGenericType(typeof(TIn), typeof(object));
protected override Expression VisitNew(NewExpression node)
{
if (!node.Type.IsAnonymousType())
return base.VisitNew(node);
if (currentType == null)
currentType = typeof(TOut);
var ctor = currentType.GetPrivateConstructor();
if (ctor == null)
return base.VisitNew(node);
NewExpression expr = Expression.New(ctor);
IEnumerable<MemberBinding> bindings = node.Members.Select(x =>
{
var mi = currentType.GetProperty(x.Name);
//if the type is anonymous then I need to transform its body
if (((PropertyInfo)x).PropertyType.IsAnonymousType())
{
//This section is became unnecessary complex!
//
var property = (PropertyInfo)x;
var parentType = currentType;
var parentParameter = currentParameter;
currentType = currentType.GetProperty(property.Name).PropertyType;
currentParameter = Expression.Parameter(currentType, currentParameter.Name + "." + property.Name);
//I pass the inner anonymous expression to VisitNew and make the non-anonymous expression from it
var xOriginal = VisitNew(node.Arguments.FirstOrDefault(a => a.Type == property.PropertyType) as NewExpression);
currentType = parentType;
currentParameter = parentParameter;
return (MemberBinding)Expression.Bind(mi, xOriginal);
}
else//if type is not anonymous then simple find the property and make the memberbinding
{
var xOriginal = Expression.PropertyOrField(currentParameter, x.Name);
return (MemberBinding)Expression.Bind(mi, xOriginal);
}
});
return Expression.MemberInit(expr, bindings);
}
protected override Expression VisitLambda<T>(Expression<T> node)
{
if (typeof(T) != funcToReplace)
return base.VisitLambda(node);
defaultParameter = node.Parameters.First();
currentParameter = defaultParameter;
var body = Visit(node.Body);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TIn, TOut>>(body, currentParameter);
}
}
And use it like this:
public static Expression<Func<Tin, Tout>> Transform<Tin, Tout>(this Expression<Func<Tin, object>> source)
{
var visitor = new ReturnTypeVisitor<Tin, Tout>();
var result = (Expression<Func<Tin, Tout>>)visitor.Visit(source);
return result;// result.Compile() throw the aforementioned error
}
Here is the extension methods used inside my Visitor class:
public static ConstructorInfo GetPrivateConstructor(this Type type) =>
type.GetConstructor(BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic, null, Type.EmptyTypes, null);
// this hack taken from https://stackoverflow.com/a/2483054/4685428
// and https://stackoverflow.com/a/1650895/4685428
public static bool IsAnonymousType(this Type type)
{
var markedWithAttribute = type.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(CompilerGeneratedAttribute), inherit: false).Any();
var typeName = type.Name;
return markedWithAttribute
&& (typeName.StartsWith("<>") || type.Name.StartsWith("VB$"))
&& typeName.Contains("AnonymousType");
}
Update
Here is the .Net Fiddle link for the problem: https://dotnetfiddle.net/tlz4Qg
Update
I have removed the extra codes that seems to be out of the problem scope.

The cause of the problem in question is the line
currentParameter = Expression.Parameter(currentType, currentParameter.Name + "." + property.Name);
inside VisitNew method.
With your sample, it creates a new parameter called "x.Sub", so if we mark the parameters with {}, the actual result is
Sub = new SubType()
{
Id = {x.Sub}.Id
},
rather than expected
Sub = new SubType()
{
Id = {x}.Sub.Id
},
In general you should not create new ParameterExpressions except when remapping lambda expressions. And all newly created parameters should be passed to Expression.Lambda call, otherwise they will be considered "not defined".
Also please note that the visitor code has some assumptions which doesn't hold in general. For instance
var xOriginal = Expression.PropertyOrField(currentParameter, x.Name);
won't work inside nested new, because there you need access to a member of the x parameter like x.Sub.Id rather than x.Id. Which is basically the corersonding expression from NewExpression.Arguments.
Processing nested lambda expressions or collection type members and LINQ methods with expression visitors requires much more state control. While converting simple nested anonymous new expression like in the sample does not even need a ExpressionVisitor, because it could easily be achieved with simple recursive method like this:
public static Expression<Func<Tin, Tout>> Transform<Tin, Tout>(this Expression<Func<Tin, object>> source)
{
return Expression.Lambda<Func<Tin, Tout>>(
Transform(source.Body, typeof(Tout)),
source.Parameters);
}
static Expression Transform(Expression source, Type type)
{
if (source.Type != type && source is NewExpression newExpr && newExpr.Members.Count > 0)
{
return Expression.MemberInit(Expression.New(type), newExpr.Members
.Select(m => type.GetProperty(m.Name))
.Zip(newExpr.Arguments, (m, e) => Expression.Bind(m, Transform(e, m.PropertyType))));
}
return source;
}

Linq orderbys from collection [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Dynamic LINQ OrderBy on IEnumerable<T> / IQueryable<T>
(24 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
How do I specify the argument passed to orderby using a value I take as a parameter?
Ex:
List<Student> existingStudends = new List<Student>{ new Student {...}, new Student {...}}
Currently implementation:
List<Student> orderbyAddress = existingStudends.OrderBy(c => c.Address).ToList();
Instead of c.Address, how can I take that as a parameter?
Example
string param = "City";
List<Student> orderbyAddress = existingStudends.OrderByDescending(c => param).ToList();

You can use a little bit of reflection to construct the expression tree as follows (this is an extension method):
public static IQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string orderByProperty,
bool desc)
{
string command = desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy";
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command, new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}
orderByProperty is the Property name you want to order by and if pass true as parameter for desc, will sort in descending order; otherwise, will sort in ascending order.
Now you should be able to do existingStudents.OrderBy("City",true); or existingStudents.OrderBy("City",false);

Here's a possiblity using reflection...
var param = "Address";
var propertyInfo = typeof(Student).GetProperty(param);
var orderByAddress = items.OrderBy(x => propertyInfo.GetValue(x, null));

To expand on the answer by #Icarus: if you want the return type of the extension method to be an IOrderedQueryable instead of an IQueryable, you can simply cast the result as follows:
public static IOrderedQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string orderByProperty, bool desc)
{
string command = desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy";
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command, new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return (IOrderedQueryable<TEntity>)source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}

1) Install System.Linq.Dynamic
2) Add the following code
public static class OrderUtils
{
public static string ToStringForOrdering<T, TKey>(this Expression<Func<T, TKey>> expression, bool isDesc = false)
{
var str = expression.Body.ToString();
var param = expression.Parameters.First().Name;
str = str.Replace("Convert(", "(").Replace(param + ".", "");
return str + (isDesc ? " descending" : "");
}
}
3) Write your switch for selecting of Lambda function
public static class SortHelper
{
public static Expression<Func<UserApp, object>> UserApp(string orderProperty)
{
orderProperty = orderProperty?.ToLowerInvariant();
switch (orderProperty)
{
case "firstname":
return x => x.PersonalInfo.FirstName;
case "lastname":
return x => x.PersonalInfo.LastName;
case "fullname":
return x => x.PersonalInfo.FirstName + x.PersonalInfo.LastName;
case "email":
return x => x.Email;
}
}
}
4) Use your helpers
Dbset.OrderBy(SortHelper.UserApp("firstname").ToStringForOrdering())
5) You can use it with pagging (PagedList)
public virtual IPagedList<T> GetPage<TOrder>(Page page, Expression<Func<T, bool>> where, Expression<Func<T, TOrder>> order, bool isDesc = false,
params Expression<Func<T, object>>[] includes)
{
var orderedQueryable = Dbset.OrderBy(order.ToStringForOrdering(isDesc));
var query = orderedQueryable.Where(where).GetPage(page);
query = AppendIncludes(query, includes);
var results = query.ToList();
var total = Dbset.Count(where);
return new StaticPagedList<T>(results, page.PageNumber, page.PageSize, total);
}
Explanation
System.Linq.Dynamic allows us to set string value in OrderBy method. But inside this extension the string will be parsed to Lambda. So I thought it would work if we will parse Lambda to string and give it to OrderBy method. And it works!

Here's something I came up with for dealing with a conditional Descending. You could combine this with other methods of generating the keySelector func dynamically.
public static IOrderedQueryable<TSource> OrderBy<TSource, TKey>(this IQueryable<TSource> source,
System.Linq.Expressions.Expression<Func<TSource, TKey>> keySelector,
System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection sortOrder
)
{
if (sortOrder == System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection.Ascending)
return source.OrderBy(keySelector);
else
return source.OrderByDescending(keySelector);
}
Usage:
//imagine this is some parameter
var direction = System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection.Ascending;
query = query.OrderBy(ec => ec.MyColumnName, direction);
Notice this allows you to chain this .OrderBy extension with a new parameter onto any IQueryable.
// perhaps passed in as a request of user to change sort order
// var direction = System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection.Ascending;
query = context.Orders
.Where(o => o.Status == OrderStatus.Paid)
.OrderBy(ec => ec.OrderPaidUtc, direction);

private Func<T, object> GetOrderByExpression<T>(string sortColumn)
{
Func<T, object> orderByExpr = null;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(sortColumn))
{
Type sponsorResultType = typeof(T);
if (sponsorResultType.GetProperties().Any(prop => prop.Name == sortColumn))
{
System.Reflection.PropertyInfo pinfo = sponsorResultType.GetProperty(sortColumn);
orderByExpr = (data => pinfo.GetValue(data, null));
}
}
return orderByExpr;
}
public List<T> OrderByDir<T>(IEnumerable<T> source, string dir, Func<T, object> OrderByColumn)
{
return dir.ToUpper() == "ASC" ? source.OrderBy(OrderByColumn).ToList() : source.OrderByDescending(OrderByColumn).ToList();``
}
// Call the code like below
var orderByExpression= GetOrderByExpression<SearchResultsType>(sort);
var data = OrderByDir<SponsorSearchResults>(resultRecords, SortDirectionString, orderByExpression);

This doesn't let you pass a string, as you asked for in your question, but it might still work for you.
The OrderByDescending method takes a Func<TSource, TKey>, so you can rewrite your function this way:
List<Student> QueryStudents<TKey>(Func<Student, TKey> orderBy)
{
return existingStudents.OrderByDescending(orderBy).ToList();
}
There are other overloads for OrderByDescending as well that take a Expression<Func<TSource, TKey>>, and/or a IComparer<TKey>. You could also look into those and see if they provide you anything of use.

The only solution that worked for me was posted here https://gist.github.com/neoGeneva/1878868 by neoGeneva.
I will re-post his code because it works well and I wouldn't want it to be lost in the interwebs!
public static IQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string sortExpression)
{
if (source == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("source", "source is null.");
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(sortExpression))
throw new ArgumentException("sortExpression is null or empty.", "sortExpression");
var parts = sortExpression.Split(' ');
var isDescending = false;
var propertyName = "";
var tType = typeof(T);
if (parts.Length > 0 && parts[0] != "")
{
propertyName = parts[0];
if (parts.Length > 1)
{
isDescending = parts[1].ToLower().Contains("esc");
}
PropertyInfo prop = tType.GetProperty(propertyName);
if (prop == null)
{
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format("No property '{0}' on type '{1}'", propertyName, tType.Name));
}
var funcType = typeof(Func<,>)
.MakeGenericType(tType, prop.PropertyType);
var lambdaBuilder = typeof(Expression)
.GetMethods()
.First(x => x.Name == "Lambda" && x.ContainsGenericParameters && x.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(funcType);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(tType);
var propExpress = Expression.Property(parameter, prop);
var sortLambda = lambdaBuilder
.Invoke(null, new object[] { propExpress, new ParameterExpression[] { parameter } });
var sorter = typeof(Queryable)
.GetMethods()
.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Name == (isDescending ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy") && x.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(new[] { tType, prop.PropertyType });
return (IQueryable<T>)sorter
.Invoke(null, new object[] { source, sortLambda });
}
return source;
}

Add the nugget package Dynamite to your code
Add the namespace Dynamite.Extensions
Eg : using Dynamite.Extensions;
Give Order by query like any SQL query
Eg : students.OrderBy(" City DESC, Address").ToList();

To extend the response of #Icarus: if you want to sort by two fields I could perform the following function (for one field the response of Icarius works very well).
public static IQueryable<T> OrderByDynamic<T>(this IQueryable<T> q, string SortField1, string SortField2, bool Ascending)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "p");
var body = GetBodyExp(SortField1, SortField2, param);
var exp = Expression.Lambda(body, param);
string method = Ascending ? "OrderBy" : "OrderByDescending";
Type[] types = new Type[] { q.ElementType, exp.Body.Type };
var mce = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), method, types, q.Expression, exp);
return q.Provider.CreateQuery<T>(mce);
}
This is the function that the body returns for the lambda expression, it works with string and int, but it is enough to add more types to make it work according to the need of each programmer
public static NewExpression GetBodyExp(string field1, string field2, ParameterExpression Parametro)
{
// SE OBTIENE LOS NOMBRES DE LOS TIPOS DE VARIABLE
string TypeName1 = Expression.Property(Parametro, field1).Type.Name;
string TypeName2 = Expression.Property(Parametro, field2).Type.Name;
// SE DECLARA EL TIPO ANONIMO SEGUN LOS TIPOS DE VARIABLES
Type TypeAnonymous = null;
if (TypeName1 == "String")
{
string var1 = "0";
if (TypeName2 == "Int32")
{
int var2 = 0;
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
if (TypeName2 == "String")
{
string var2 = "0";
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
}
if (TypeName1 == "Int32")
{
int var1 = 0;
if (TypeName2 == "Int32")
{
string var2 = "0";
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
if (TypeName2 == "String")
{
string var2 = "0";
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
}
//se declaran los TIPOS NECESARIOS PARA GENERAR EL BODY DE LA EXPRESION LAMBDA
MemberExpression[] args = new[] { Expression.PropertyOrField(Parametro, field1), Expression.PropertyOrField(Parametro, field2) };
ConstructorInfo CInfo = TypeAnonymous.GetConstructors()[0];
IEnumerable<MemberInfo> a = TypeAnonymous.GetMembers().Where(m => m.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property);
//BODY
NewExpression body = Expression.New(CInfo, args, TypeAnonymous.GetMembers().Where(m => m.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property));
return body;
}
to use it the following is done
IQueryable<MyClass> IqMyClass= context.MyClass.AsQueryable();
List<MyClass> ListMyClass= IqMyClass.OrderByDynamic("UserName", "IdMyClass", true).ToList();
if there is a better way to do this, it would be great if they share it
I managed to solve it thanks to: How can I make a Multiple property lambda expression with Linq

New Answer : this is a more complete answer that supports multiple columns for order by like SQL. Example : .OrderBy("FirstName,Age DESC") :
namespace Utility;
public static class QueryExtension
{
public static IQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string orderByProperty, bool desc, bool isThenBy = false)
{
string command = isThenBy ? (desc ? "ThenByDescending" : "ThenBy") : (desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy");
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command, new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}
public static IQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string sqlOrderByList)
{
var ordebyItems = sqlOrderByList.Trim().Split(',');
IQueryable<TEntity> result = source;
bool useThenBy = false;
foreach (var item in ordebyItems)
{
var splt = item.Trim().Split(' ');
result = result.OrderBy(splt[0].Trim(), (splt.Length > 1 && splt[1].Trim().ToLower() == "desc"), useThenBy);
if (useThenBy)
useThenBy = true;
}
return result;
}
}
The second function iterates over orderby columns and uses the first one.
Use it like this :
using Utility;
...
public void MyMethod()
{
var query = _dbContext.Person.AsQueryable();
query.OrderBy("FirstName,Age DESC");
}

I'm way late to the party but none of these solutions worked for me. I was eager to try System.Linq.Dynamic, but I couldn't find that on Nuget, maybe depreciated? Either way...
Here is a solutions I came up with. I needed to dynamically use a mixture of OrderBy, OrderByDescending and OrderBy > ThenBy.
I simply created an extension method for my list object, a bit hacky I know... I wouldn't recommend this if it were something I was doing a lot of, but it's good for a one off.
List<Employee> Employees = GetAllEmployees();
foreach(Employee oEmployee in Employees.ApplyDynamicSort(eEmployeeSort))
{
//do stuff
}
public static IOrderedEnumerable<Employee> ApplyDynamicSort(this List<Employee> lEmployees, Enums.EmployeeSort eEmployeeSort)
{
switch (eEmployeeSort)
{
case Enums.EmployeeSort.Name_ASC:
return lEmployees.OrderBy(x => x.Name);
case Enums.EmployeeSort.Name_DESC:
return lEmployees.OrderByDescending(x => x.Name);
case Enums.EmployeeSort.Department_ASC_Salary_DESC:
return lEmployees.OrderBy(x => x.Department).ThenByDescending(y => y.Salary);
default:
return lEmployees.OrderBy(x => x.Name);
}
}

LINQ with reflection for nested property values

I'm looking to create a Linq Where, based on a nested property.
Let's say this is my project:
public class Car {
public Engine Engine { get; set; }
}
public class Engine {
public int HorsePower { get; set; }
}
var myCar = new Car() {
Engine = new Engine() {
HorsePower = 400
}
};
I use this code found somewhere, which allow to create Expression,
private Expression<Func<TItem, bool>> PropertyEquals<TItem, TValue>( PropertyInfo property, TValue value ) {
var param = Expression.Parameter( typeof( TItem ) );
var memberExp = Expression.Property( param, property );
BinaryExpression body;
//If nullable, Expression.Equal won't work even if the value is not null. So we convert to non nullable (the compared expression)
Type typeIfNullable = Nullable.GetUnderlyingType( memberExp.Type );
if ( typeIfNullable != null ) {
var convertedExp = Expression.Convert( memberExp, Expression.Constant( value ).Type );
body = Expression.Equal( convertedExp, Expression.Constant( value ) );
} else {
body = Expression.Equal( memberExp, Expression.Constant( value ) );
}
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TItem, bool>>( body, param );
}
Now, I had like to have an equivalent, calling my method PropertyEquals
var engine = myCar.Select( c => c.Engine.HorsePower == 400 );
Something like
var property = GetPropertyForDotSequence( typeof( Car ), "Engine.HorsePower" );
.Select( PropertyEquals<TEntity, int>( property , 400 ) );
I found a method which allow to find property based on a dotted format (GetPropertyForDotSequence), which work properly, but return HorsePower property info, and not Engine.HorsePower, so I get an error saying Car doesnot have an int32 property called HorsePower.
private PropertyInfo GetPropertyForDotSequence ( Type baseType, string propertyName ) {
var parts = propertyName.Split( '.' );
return ( parts.Length > 1 )
? GetPropertyForDotSequence( baseType.GetProperty( parts[ 0 ] ).PropertyType, parts.Skip( 1 ).Aggregate( ( a, i ) => a + "." + i ) )
: baseType.GetProperty( propertyName );
}

In order to achieve your goal, instead of using a separate helper function to extract the last property info from a property path and then passing the property info to your function, all that should be done inside the function itself, i.e. it should receive the string containing the property path like this
public static partial class Utils
{
public static Expression<Func<TItem, bool>> PropertyEquals<TItem, TValue>(string propertyPath, TValue value)
{
var source = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TItem), "source");
var propertyNames = propertyPath.Split('.');
var member = Expression.Property(source, propertyNames[0]);
for (int i = 1; i < propertyNames.Length; i++)
member = Expression.Property(member, propertyNames[i]);
Expression left = member, right = Expression.Constant(value, typeof(TValue));
if (left.Type != right.Type)
{
var nullableType = Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(left.Type);
if (nullableType != null)
right = Expression.Convert(right, left.Type);
else
left = Expression.Convert(left, right.Type);
}
var body = Expression.Equal(left, right);
var expr = Expression.Lambda<Func<TItem, bool>>(body, source);
return expr;
}
}
I'm not quite sure how it can be useful though because the signature does not allow inferring the generic types, so it would require something like this
var predicate = Utils.PropertyEquals<Car, int>("Engine.HorsePower", 400);
bool result = predicate.Compile().Invoke(myCar);
IMO it would be useful if used with combination of the following extension methods
public static partial class Utils
{
public static IQueryable<T> WherePropertyEquals<T, TValue>(this IQueryable<T> source, string propertyPath, TValue value)
{
return source.Where(PropertyEquals<T, TValue>(propertyPath, value));
}
public static IEnumerable<T> WherePropertyEquals<T, TValue>(this IEnumerable<T> source, string propertyPath, TValue value)
{
return source.Where(PropertyEquals<T, TValue>(propertyPath, value).Compile());
}
}
so you can write something like this
List<Car> cars = new List<Car> { myCar };
var cars400 = cars.WherePropertyEquals("Engine.HorsePower", 400).ToList();

You can use this method to get the property value from an object with the nested property name as string
public static object GetNestedPropertyValue(object obj, string nestedDottedPropertyName)
{
foreach (String part in nestedDottedPropertyName.Split('.'))
{
if (obj == null)
return null;
PropertyInfo info = obj.GetType().GetProperty(part);
if (info == null)
return null;
obj = info.GetValue(obj, null);
}
return obj;
}
But this is not valid Linq statement
var engine = myCar.Select( c => c.Engine.HorsePower == 400 );
What you can do instead is, if you have a car object like this
var myCar = new Car()
{
Engine = new Engine()
{
HorsePower = 400
}
};
You can get the value of Engine.HorsePower as
var horsePower = (int)GetNestedPropertyValue(myCar, "Engine.HorsePower");
Edit
For a Linq example, if you have a List<Car> like this
var myCar2 = new Car()
{
Engine = new Engine()
{
HorsePower = 800
}
};
var cars = new List<Car> { myCar, myCar2 }; //myCar defined above
You can use Linq as
var car400 = cars.FirstOrDefault(c => (int)GetNestedPropertyValue(c, "Engine.HorsePower") == 400); //=> myCar
var horsePowers = cars.Select(c => (int)GetNestedPropertyValue(c, "Engine.HorsePower")); //=> 400, 800

Expression.Like in C#

eg: x=> x.Name = "g"
I have code block like this
public Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> SearchExpression()
{
var c = new ConstantExpression[_paramList.Count];
var b = new BinaryExpression[_paramList.Count];
BinaryExpression comparisonExpression = null;
var entity = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TEntity));
for (int i = 0; i < _paramList.Count; i++)
{
var value = Convert.ChangeType(_paramList[i].Item2 /*"g"*/, _paramList[i].Item3 /*System.String*/);
c[i] = Expression.Constant(value); //"g"
// PROBLEM IS HERE
b[i] = Expression.Equal(Expression.Property(entity, _paramList[i].Item1 /*Name*/, c[i]);
// PROBLEM IS HERE
}
_paramList.Clear();
comparisonExpression = b.Aggregate(Expression.And);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TEntity, bool>>(comparisonExpression, entity);
}
works like charm but I need Expression.Like (Like "g" not Equal "g")
Expression.Like(Expression.Property(entity, _paramList[i].Item1), c[i])
but C# expression tree does not support Like method
UPDATE :
I wrote something like this :
Expression.Call(Expression.Property(entity, _paramList[i].Item1),
typeof(String).GetMethod("Contains"), new Expression[] { c[i] });
but I need BinaryExpression not MethodCallExpression

You can make your code work by adding an equals expression over the method call, like so:
b[i] = Expression.Equal(
Expression.Call(Expression.Property(entity, _paramList[i].Item1),
typeof (String).GetMethod("Contains"),
new Expression[] {c[i]}), Expression.Constant(true));
In pseudo code this reads as:
b[i] = entity => entity.someProperty.Contains(c[i]) == true;
Which will return a binary expression for you.

This answer does not consider your array and the 'and' aggregation, but this should be considered as a separate issue.
Consider this class:
class MyEntity { string Name { get; set; } }
We want to query:
select ... from MyEntity where Name like '%query%';
The following method is a general implementation of the above query pattern:
static Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> Like<TEntity>(string propertyName, string queryText)
{
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof (TEntity), "entity");
var getter = Expression.Property(parameter, propertyName);
//ToString is not supported in Linq-To-Entities, throw an exception if the property is not a string.
if (getter.Type != typeof (string))
throw new ArgumentException("Property must be a string");
//string.Contains with string parameter.
var stringContainsMethod = typeof (string).GetMethod("Contains", new[] {typeof (string)});
var containsCall = Expression.Call(getter, stringContainsMethod,
Expression.Constant(queryText, typeof (string)));
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TEntity, bool>>(containsCall, parameter);
}
If you want to have a pattern of query% or %query you can use string.StartsWith and string.EndsWith instead of Contains.
Also, you can share the parameter across multiple calls if you adjust the signature.
The current implementation throws an exception if the data type of the property is not a string. Look at this answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/3292773/668272 for converting numbers to strings.

I've done this in a scripting language I wrote, which allows you to say things like name like 'bob%'. The trick is that you need to map it to a method call which takes the value and regular expression and call this from within the Expression.
If you take a look at the LikeEvaluator class in my Wire scripting language you'll see how I did it:
static class LikeEvaluator
{
private static readonly MethodInfo ApplyLikeMethodInfo=typeof(LikeEvaluator).GetMethod("ApplyLike");
private static readonly MethodInfo ApplyLikeNoCaseMethodInfo=typeof(LikeEvaluator).GetMethod("ApplyLikeNoCase");
public static Expression Like(CaseMode caseMode, Expression lhs, Expression pattern)
{
Expression x=null;
if(caseMode==CaseMode.Sensitive)
{
x=Expression.Call(ApplyLikeMethodInfo,lhs,pattern);
}
else
{
x=Expression.Call(ApplyLikeNoCaseMethodInfo,lhs,pattern);
}
return x;
}
public static bool ApplyLike(string text, string likePattern)
{
string pattern=PatternToRegex(likePattern);
return Regex.IsMatch(text,pattern,RegexOptions.None);
}
public static bool ApplyLikeNoCase(string text, string likePattern)
{
string pattern=PatternToRegex(likePattern);
return Regex.IsMatch(text,pattern,RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
}
public static string PatternToRegex(string pattern)
{
pattern=Regex.Escape(pattern);
pattern=pattern.Replace("%",#".*");
pattern=string.Format("^{0}$",pattern);
return pattern;
}
}

Invoking lambda expressions in Expression trees

I have a SelectionCriteria class that I use for building Entity Framework query expressions, based on PredicateBuilder. Within its limits, it's working fine. I'd like to extend it so that it can query whether a field contains a substring. My problem is that I can't see how to build the needed expression object.
My actual class supports and, or, and not, but they aren't relevant to my question. So I've simplified my example code to handle only a single binary operation:
public class SelectionCriteria
{
public SelectionComparison selectionComparison { get; set; }
public string fieldName { get; set; }
public object fieldValue { get; set; }
public Expression<Func<T, bool>> constructSinglePredicate<T>()
{
var type = typeof(T);
if (type.GetProperty(this.fieldName) == null && type.GetField(this.fieldName) == null)
throw new MissingMemberException(type.Name, this.fieldName);
ExpressionType operation;
if (!operationMap.TryGetValue(this.selectionComparison, out operation))
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("selectionComparison", this.selectionComparison, "Invalid filter operation");
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type);
var member = Expression.PropertyOrField(parameter, this.fieldName);
var value = (this.fieldValue == null) ? Expression.Constant(null) : Expression.Constant(this.fieldValue, this.fieldValue.GetType());
try
{
var converted = (value.Type != member.Type)
? (Expression) Expression.Convert(value, member.Type)
: (Expression) value;
var comparison = Expression.MakeBinary(operation, member, converted);
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(comparison, parameter);
return lambda;
}
catch (Exception)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException(
String.Format("Cannot convert value \"{0}\" of type \"{1}\" to field \"{2}\" of type \"{3}\"", this.fieldValue,
value.Type, this.fieldName, member.Type));
}
}
private static Dictionary<SelectionComparison, ExpressionType> operationMap =
new Dictionary<SelectionComparison, ExpressionType>
{
{ SelectionComparison.Equal, ExpressionType.Equal },
{ SelectionComparison.GreaterThan, ExpressionType.GreaterThan },
};
}
public enum SelectionComparison
{
Equal,
GreaterThan,
Contains,
};
Usage is simple:
var criteria = new SelectionCriteria
{
selectionComparison = SelectionComparison.GreaterThan,
fieldName = "worktobegindate",
fieldValue = DateTime.Now.AddDays(-2)
};
var predicate = criteria .constructPredicate<job>();
var jobs = myDbContext.jobs.Where(predicate);
So, my problem - I need a method, like my constructSinglePredictate() above, that returns an Expression> and applies a .Contains(
It's trivial to apply Contains() to a string, given a string to compare it to, but I'm having difficulty figuring out how to do the same in an Expression.
Ideas?

As is usual, I was thinking about things incorrectly. I don't need a lambda that calls a method on a string, I need a MethodExpression (here extracted from the methodMap dictionary):
public Expression<Func<T, bool>> constructMethodCallPredicate<T>()
{
var type = typeof(T);
if (type.GetProperty(this.fieldName) == null && type.GetField(this.fieldName) == null)
throw new MissingMemberException(type.Name, this.fieldName);
MethodInfo method;
if (!methodMap.TryGetValue(this.selectionComparison, out method))
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("selectionComparison", this.selectionComparison, "Invalid filter operation");
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type);
var member = Expression.PropertyOrField(parameter, this.fieldName);
var value = (this.fieldValue == null) ? Expression.Constant(null) : Expression.Constant(this.fieldValue, this.fieldValue.GetType());
try
{
var converted = (value.Type != member.Type)
? (Expression)Expression.Convert(value, member.Type)
: (Expression)value;
var methodExpression = Expression.Call(member, method, converted);
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(methodExpression, parameter);
return lambda;
}
catch (Exception)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException(
String.Format("Cannot convert value \"{0}\" of type \"{1}\" to field \"{2}\" of type \"{3}\"", this.fieldValue,
value.Type, this.fieldName, member.Type));
}
}
private static readonly Dictionary<SelectionComparison, MethodInfo> methodMap =
new Dictionary<SelectionComparison, MethodInfo>
{
{ SelectionComparison.Contains, typeof(string).GetMethod("Contains", new[] { typeof(string) }) },
{ SelectionComparison.StartsWith, typeof(string).GetMethod("StartsWith", new[] { typeof(string) }) },
{ SelectionComparison.EndsWith, typeof(string).GetMethod("EndsWith", new[] { typeof(string) }) },
};
public enum SelectionComparison
{
Equal,
NotEqual,
LessThan,
LessThanOrEqual,
GreaterThan,
GreaterThanOrEqual,
Contains,
StartsWith,
EndsWith,
};
Getting an actual "Like" comparison to work, using SqlFunctions.PatIndex is a bit more complicated, PatIndex() returns an int, and I need to wrap it in a >0 expression, but it works just fine, as well.