I'm using C#, EF5, and Lambda style queries against SQL.
I have the usual scenario of binding data to gridviews. Some of the results for my columns may be too long (character count) and so I only want to display the first 'n' characters. Let's say 10 characters for this example. When I truncate a result, I'd like to indicate this by appending "...". So, let's say the following last names are returned:
Mercer, Smith, Garcia-Jones
I'd like them to be returned like this:
Mercer, Smith, Garcia-Jon...
I was doing something like this:
using (var context = new iaiEntityConnection())
{
var query = context.applications.Where(c => c.id == applicationPrimaryKey);
var results = query.ToList();
foreach (var row in results)
{
if (row.employerName.Length > 10)
{
row.employerName = row.employerName.Substring(0, Math.Min(10, row.employerName.ToString().Length)) + "...";
}
if (row.jobTitle.Length > 10)
{
row.jobTitle = row.jobTitle.Substring(0, Math.Min(10, row.jobTitle.ToString().Length)) + "...";
}
}
gdvWorkHistory.DataSource = results;
gdvWorkHistory.DataBind();
However, if I change my query to select specific columns like this:
var query2 = context.applications.Select(c => new
{
c.id,
c.applicationCode,
c.applicationCategoryLong,
c.applicationType,
c.renew_certification.PGI_nameLast,
c.renew_certification.PGI_nameFirst,
c.renew_certification.PAI_homeCity,
c.renew_certification.PAI_homeState,
c.reviewStatusUser,
c.dateTimeSubmittedByUser
})
The result appears to become read-only if specific columns are selected, and I really should be selecting just the columns I need. I'm losing my ability to edit the result set.
So, I'm rethinking the entire approach. There must be away to select the first 'n' characters on select, right? Is there anyway to append the "..." if the length is > 10 on select? That seems trickier. Also, I guess I could parse through the gridview after bind and make this adjustment. Or, perhaps there is a way to maintain my ability to edit the result set when selecting specific columns?
I welcome your thoughts. Thanks!
To quote MSDN
Anonymous types provide a convenient way to encapsulate a set of read-only properties into a single object without having to explicitly define a type first.
So you would have to define a class and select into that if you want read write capability.
e.g.
public class MyClass {
public int id { get; set; }
public string applicationCode {get; set; }
// rest of property defintions.
}
var query2 = context.applications.Select(c => new MyClass {
id = c.id,
applicationCode = c.applicationCode,
// Rest of assignments
};
As to just providing 10 character limit with ... appended. I'm going to assume you mean on the applicationcategoryLog field but you can use the same logic on other fields.
var query2 = context.applications.Select(c => new
{
c.id,
c.applicationCode,
applicationCategoryLong = (c.applicationCategoryLong ?? string.Empty).Length <= 10 ?
c.applicationCategoryLong :
c.applicationCategoryLong.Substring(0,10) + "...",
c.applicationType,
c.renew_certification.PGI_nameLast,
c.renew_certification.PGI_nameFirst,
c.renew_certification.PAI_homeCity,
c.renew_certification.PAI_homeState,
c.reviewStatusUser,
c.dateTimeSubmittedByUser
})
Related
I use System.Linq.Dynamic to query entities with dynamic 'where' expressions. I'm querying object that has property "newValue" of string type. Exemplary value would be : "{\"ProcessId\":764, \"ProcessLength\":1000}".
I can't use == because I want to find all hits where the property contains "ProcessId:764", regardless on the rest of the string. The thing is, that stored string contains escape sign "\" and double quotes and I can't figure out what it should like exactly..
dbContext.Processes.Where("#newValue.Contains(\"ProcessId\":764\")") brings error, however dbContext.Processes.Where("#newValue.Contains(\":764\")") works correctly. I guess it must be something with backslashes or double quotes in my query but can't figure it out on my own..
There are two things to note here:
If you know at compile time the column that should be queried (i.e., newValue), just use standard Linq: var list = items.Where(i => i.NewValue.Contains("904")).ToList().
If you do want to use dyanmic Linq, What you'd usually want is to apply Where on some column, e.g. Where("SomeColumn.Contains("something")"), or Where("SomeColumn.Contains(#0)", new string[] {"something"}).
So, in your case, this should work: items.Where("newValue.Contains(\"904\")").
Doing Where("#newValue.Contains("something")") doesn't really make sense, since #newValue would be parsed as a string literal. See also this comment on a similiar question.
Here' a quick example:
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
var items = new []
{
new { Id = "1", Title = "ProcessId: 123"},
new { Id = "4", Title = "ProcessId: 456"},
new { Id = "7", Title = "ProcessId: 789"},
}.ToList();
// returns null, because the string "Title" doesn't contain the string "7"
var res1 = items.Where("#0.Contains(\"7\")", new string[] {"Title"}).FirstOrDefault();
// works - returns the 3rd element of the array
var res2a = items.Where("Title.Contains(#0)", new string[] {"ProcessId: 789"}).FirstOrDefault();
var res2b = items.Where("Title.Contains(\"ProcessId: 789\")").FirstOrDefault();
}
#HeyJude Thanks for the effort, but I still can't get it to work. It has somehow gone wronger and now I can't even fetch correct rows giving only ProcessId number..
Let me give you more detailed description of my setup. In the database there's a table with column "NewValue", I use this column to store json string of current (for the time of creating row in the table) representation of some object e.g. object Process. So the column stores for example string of {"ProcessId":904,"ProcessLength":1000}. To fetch this data from db I create collection of table's records: var items = (from l in db.JDE_Logs
join u in db.JDE_Users on l.UserId equals u.UserId
join t in db.JDE_Tenants on l.TenantId equals t.TenantId
where l.TenantId == tenants.FirstOrDefault().TenantId && l.Timestamp >= dFrom && l.Timestamp <= dTo
orderby l.Timestamp descending
select new //ExtLog
{
LogId = l.LogId,
TimeStamp = l.Timestamp,
TenantId = t.TenantId,
TenantName = t.TenantName,
UserId = l.UserId,
UserName = u.Name + " " + u.Surname,
Description = l.Description,
OldValue = l.OldValue,
NewValue = l.NewValue
});. Then I query it to find matching rows for given ProcessId number e.g. query = "#NewValue.Contains(\"904,)\")";
items = items.Where(query);
This should fetch back all records where NewValue column contains the query string, but this doesn't work. It compiles and 'works' but no data are fetched or fetched are only those records where 904 appears later in the string. Sounds stupid but this is what it is.
What should the query string look like to fetch all records containing "ProcessId":904?
i know it is not complicated but i struggle with it.
I have IList<Material> collection
public class Material
{
public string Number { get; set; }
public decimal? Value { get; set; }
}
materials = new List<Material>();
materials.Add(new Material { Number = 111 });
materials.Add(new Material { Number = 222 });
And i have DbSet<Material> collection
with columns Number and ValueColumn
I need to update IList<Material> Value property based on DbSet<Material> collection but with following conditions
Only one query request into database
The returned data from database has to be limited by Number identifier (do not load whole database table into memory)
I tried following (based on my previous question)
Working solution 1, but download whole table into memory (monitored in sql server profiler).
var result = (
from db_m in db.Material
join m in model.Materials
on db_m.Number.ToString() equals m.Number
select new
{
db_m.Number,
db_m.Value
}
).ToList();
model.Materials.ToList().ForEach(m => m.Value= result.SingleOrDefault(db_m => db_m.Number.ToString() == m.Number).Value);
Working solution 2, but it execute query for each item in the collection.
model.Materials.ToList().ForEach(m => m.Value= db.Material.FirstOrDefault(db_m => db_m.Number.ToString() == m.Number).Value);
Incompletely solution, where i tried to use contains method
// I am trying to get new filtered collection from database, which i will iterate after.
var result = db.Material
.Where(x=>
// here is the reasonable error: cannot convert int into Material class, but i do not know how to solve this.
model.Materials.Contains(x.Number)
)
.Select(material => new Material { Number = material.Number.ToString(), Value = material.Value});
Any idea ? For me it is much easier to execute stored procedure with comma separated id values as a parameter and get the data directly, but i want to master linq too.
I'd do something like this without trying to get too cute :
var numbersToFilterby = model.Materials.Select(m => m.Number).ToArray();
...
var result = from db_m in db.Material where numbersToFilterBy.Contains(db_m.Number) select new { ... }
Is it possible to dynamically limit the number of columns returned from a LINQ to SQL query?
I have a database SQL View with over 50 columns. My app has a domain object with over 50 properties, one for each column. In my winforms project I bind a list of domain objects to a grid. By default only a few of the columns are visible however the user can turn on/off any of the columns.
Users are complaining the grid takes too long to load. I captured the LINQ generated SQL query then executed it within SQL Server Management Studio and verified its slow. If I alter the SQL statement, removing all the invisible columns, it runs almost instantly. There is a direct correlation between performance and the number of columns in the query.
I'm wondering if its possible to dynamically alter the number of columns returned from the LINQ generated SQL query? For example, here is what my code currently looks like:
public List<Entity> GetEntities()
{
using (var context = new CensusEntities())
{
return (from e in context.Entities
select e).ToList();
}
}
The context.Entities object was generated from a SQL View that contains over 50 columns so when the above executes it generates SQL like "SELECT Col1, Col2, Col3, ... Col50 FROM Entity INNER JOIN...". I would like to change the method signature to look like this:
public List<Entity> GetEntities(string[] visibleColumns)
{
using (var context = new CensusEntities())
{
return (from e in context.Entities
select e).ToList();
}
}
I'm not sure how to alter the body of this method to change the generated SQL statement to only return the column values I care about, all others can be NULL.
Something like this should work:
List<string> columns = new List<string>();
columns.Add("EmployeeID");
columns.Add("HireDate");
columns.Add("City");
Add columns to your list ^.
var result = Class.ReturnList(columns);
Pass the List to a method ^.
public static List<Entity> ReturnList(List<string> VisibleColumns)
{
StringBuilder SqlStatement = new StringBuilder();
SqlStatement.Append("Select ");
for (int i = 0; i < VisibleColumns.Count; i++)
{
if (i == VisibleColumns.Count - 1)
{
SqlStatement.Append(VisibleColumns[i]);
}
else
{
SqlStatement.Append(VisibleColumns[i]);
SqlStatement.Append(",");
}
}
SqlStatement.Append(" FROM Entity");
using (var ctx = new DataClasses1DataContext())
{
var result = ctx.ExecuteQuery<Entity>(SqlStatement.ToString());
return result.ToList();
}
}
This basically just makes a SELECT statement with all the fields you passed in with the VisibleColumns list.
In this case, the SQL statement that will be generated by the strings in the VisibleColumns list is:
Select EmployeeID, HireDate, City From Employee
(note: i used the Northwind database to try this out, hence the EmployeeID etc column names. You should replace them with your own, obviously.)
It is not trivial to do this dynamically, but if you have a limited set of combinations of columns you want to retreive you can do an explicit select like this:
public List<Entity> GetEntities()
{
using (var context = new CensusEntities())
{
return (from e in context.Entities
select new
{
col1 = e.col1,
col4 = e.col4,
col5 = e.col5,
}
).ToList()
.Select(x=>new Entity{col1 = x.col1, col4 = x.col4, col5 = x.col5}).ToList();
}
}
The extra select step is necessary because LINQ2SQL won't create partial entities for you.
Create a method for each common combination of columns (especially the initial) the users wants to retrieve.
However to make this dynamic you can build a query with you entity stored as a property in an anonymous class and collect your result properties in another anonymous class in second property in the same anonymous class. Finally you select your entities from the collected objects into objects of the correct type.
public List<Entity> GetEntities()
{
using (var context = new CensusEntities())
{
var combinedResult = (from e in context.Entities
select new {
Entity = e,
CollectedValues = new
{
// Insert default values of the correct type as placeholders
col1 = 0, // or "" for string or false for bool
col2 = 0, // or "" for string or false for bool
// ...
col49 = 0, // or "" for string or false for bool
col50 = 0, // or "" for string or false for bool
}
);
// Then copy each requested property
// col1
if (useCol1)
{
var combinedResult = (from e in combinedResult
select new {
Entity = e,
CollectedValues = new
{
col1 = e.Enitity.col1, // <-- here we update with the real value
col2 = e.CollectedValues.col2, // <-- here we just use any previous value
// ...
col49 = e.CollectedValues.col49, // <-- here we just use any previous value
col50 = e.CollectedValues.col50, // <-- here we just use any previous value }
);
}
// col2
if (useCol2)
{
// same as last time
col1 = e.CollectedValues.col1, // <-- here we just use any previous value
col2 = e.Enitity.col2, // <-- here we update with the real value
// ...
}
// repeat for all columns, update the column you want to fetch
// Just get the collected objects, discard the temporary
// Entity property. When the query is executed here only
// The properties we actually have used from the Entity object
// will be fetched from the database and mapped.
return combinedResult.Select(x => x.CollectedValues).ToList()
.Select(x=>new Entity{col1 = x.col1, col2 = x.col2, ... col50 = x.col50}).ToList();
}
}
There will be lots of code, and a pain to maintain, but it should work.
If you are going this route I suggest that you build a code generator that builds this code with reflection from your LINQ context.
Try something like this
using (var context = new CensusEntities())
{
var q = from e in context.Entities
select e.myfield1,e.myfield2;
return q.Tolist();
}
The resulting query should be lighter and also all the data conversion that goes underneath.
But if you really need to build dynamic input, I think some dynamic sql should be involved. So
build the dynamic SQL and get a data table
use a datatable to a dynamic object conversion as shown here
How can I convert a DataTable into a Dynamic object?
BTW a lot of hard work, I think you should considered using the first block of code.
I have a web page in which I am giving USER the options of writing notes. Now when ever the web page checks that a USER is:abc then it pulls up the note from the MEMO Table.
Here is my code in Page_Load():
using (EntityMemoDataContext em = new EntityMemoDataContext())
{
int getEntity = Int16.Parse(Session["EntityIdSelected"].ToString());
var showMemo = from r in em.EntityMemoVs_1s
where r.EntityID == getEntity
select r.Memo;
tbShowNote.Text = String.Join(#"<br />", showMemo);
}
tbShowNote is showing me value like this:
test<br />test1<br />test1<br />test4<br />test4
And I want it like this:
Test
Test1
Test2 ...
tbShowNote is a TextBox!
You only asked for the first memo, so that's what you got back. If you want it enumerated with each one on it's own line in html, you could do this:
using (EntityMemoDataContext em = new EntityMemoDataContext())
{
int getEntity1 = Int16.Parse(Session["EntityIdSelected"].ToString());
var showMemo = from r in em.EntityMemoVs_1s
where r.EntityID == getEntity1
select new
{
r.Memo
};
tbShowNote.Text = String.Join(#"<br />", showMemo);
}
The key takeaway is if r.Memo is of type string, then the LINQ query you executed gave you back a IQueryable<string>. It's on you to decide if you want to flatten that list later.
Edit: Equiso made a good observation in that you're actually returning an IQueryable of an anonymous type, not IQueryable<string> due to the new { ... } syntax. I'd say combine his answer with mine and run with it:
var showMemo = from r in em.EntityMemoVs_1s
where r.EntityID == getEntity1
select r.Memo;
tbShowNote.Text = String.Join(#"<br />", showMemo);
The problem is in the select part of your linq query, you are wrapping your results in an anonymous type, that is why when you call ToString() you see { Memo = test }. You probably want it like this:
var showMemo = from r in em.EntityMemoVs_1s
where r.EntityID == getEntity1
select r.Memo;
After that showMemo will contain just strings.
It looks like your showMemo is a collection and you are then just assigning the top value? If you are putting them in one string then you need to aggregate them together.
Importing a spreadsheet I have filled a DataTable object with that data and returns expected results.
Attempting to put this into a format I can easily query to search for problem records I have done the following
public void Something(DataTable dt)
{
var data = from row in dt.AsEnumerable()
select row["Order"].ToString();
}
Works as expected giving me a list of orders. However I cannot add other fields to this EnumerableRowCollection. Attempting to add other fields as follows gives me an error
public void Something(DataTable dt)
{
// row["Version"] throws an error on me
var data = from row in dt.AsEnumerable()
select row["Order"].ToString(), row["Version"].ToString();
}
Error: "A local variable named 'row' cannot be declared in this scope because it would give a different meaning to 'row' which is already used in a 'child' scope to donate something else"
I'm thinking I need to alias the column name but I'm having no luck. What am I missing here?
It sounds like you're writing a bad select statement. Try the following:
public void Something(DataTable dt)
{
var data = from row in dt.AsEnumerable()
select new {
Order = row["Order"].ToString(),
Something = row["Something"].ToString(),
Customer = row["Customer"].ToString(),
Address = row["Address"].ToString()
};
}
That will create a new collection of Anonymously Typed objects that you can iterate over and use as needed. Keep in mind, though, that you want be able to return data from the function. If you need that functionality, you need to create a concrete type to use (in place of anonymous types).
I think you should use select new like this query for example:
var q = from o in db.Orders
where o.Products.ProductName.StartsWith("Asset") &&
o.PaymentApproved == true
select new { name = o.Contacts.FirstName + " " +
o.Contacts.LastName,
product = o.Products.ProductName,
version = o.Products.Version +
(o.Products.SubVersion * 0.1)
};
You probably want the following.
var data = from row
in dt.AsEnumerable()
select new { Order = row["Order"].ToString(), Version = row["Version"].ToString() };