Looking to chain a task to a previous instance if it exists. Currently, both are executed at the same time.
Initial code that works for one task :
private async void MenuMediaAddFiles_OnClick(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
var dialog = GetDefaultOpenFileDialog();
using (dialog)
{
if (dialog.ShowDialog() == System.Windows.Forms.DialogResult.OK)
{
using (var progress = new SimpleProgress(this))
{
int addFiles = await _context.AddFiles(dialog.FileNames, progress);
Console.WriteLine("Files added: {0}", addFiles);
}
}
}
}
A failed attempt to make it work :
Task<int> _files;
private async void MenuMediaAddFiles_OnClick(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
var dialog = GetDefaultOpenFileDialog();
using (dialog)
{
if (dialog.ShowDialog() == System.Windows.Forms.DialogResult.OK)
{
using (var progress = new SimpleProgress(this))
{
int addFiles;
Task<int> files = _context.AddFiles(dialog.FileNames, progress);
if (_files == null)
{
_files = files;
}
else
{
var task1 = await _files.ContinueWith(task => _context.AddFiles(dialog.FileNames, new SimpleProgress(this)));
}
addFiles = await _files;
Console.WriteLine("Files added: {0}", addFiles);
}
}
}
}
You were pretty close, but there were a few things that needed to be modified:
private Task<int> previousTask = Task.FromResult(0);
private async void MenuMediaAddFiles_OnClick(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
var dialog = GetDefaultOpenFileDialog();
using (dialog)
{
if (dialog.ShowDialog() == System.Windows.Forms.DialogResult.OK)
{
using (var progress = new SimpleProgress(this))
{
previousTask = previousTask.ContinueWith(t =>
_context.AddFiles(dialog.FileNames, progress))
.UnWrap(); ;
int addFiles = await previousTask;
Console.WriteLine("Files added: {0}", addFiles);
}
}
}
}
Things to note:
Rather than having the previous task be null sometimes, it was easier to initialize it to an already completed task (Task.FromResult(0)). This avoids the null check code.
You were calling AddFiles twice. You shouldn't have been calling it before the if, and you weren't ever assigning the task to the instance field inside the if.
I used UnWrap instead of await to turn the Task<Task<int>> into a Task<int>. Both work, but in this case I felt UnWrap made its intentions clearer.
Note that since the entire event handler will be running in the UI thread there's no need to synchronize access to previousTask, if it doesn't, you'd need to do some locking.
Related
I am a newbie with C#. I am trying to get a task to run in parallel to a stored procedure execution. So for example - I have a stored procedure which in this instance will just be running WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:10'. During that ten seconds a label will be populated with text which will have full stops added and then remove as you would see in a loading screen.
Disabling Replication.
Disabling Replication..
Disabling Replication...
Once the proc is completed it will break out of the while loop. This is being handled by a boolean value. So _IsRunning = false, run stored procedure then set IsRunning = true. The code works exactly as I would want it to if I just use Thread.Sleep(1000), which I used for test purposes, instead of a stored procedure.
Can someone tell me why this will not work when using the stored procedure? It just gets stuck on the while loop and constantly says Disabling Replication with the loading full stops.
using System;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Windows.Forms;
namespace AsynchronousCoding
{
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
private DataAccess _access = new DataAccess();
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private async Task LoadRapport()
{
await DisableReplication();
}
private async Task DisableReplication()
{
Task.Factory.StartNew(TestMethod);
await Task.Factory.StartNew(() => ShowProgressText("Disabling Replication"));
}
private bool _IsRunning;
private void TestMethod()
{
_isRunning= false;
//Thread.Sleep(10000);
_access.Rapport_ReplicationSetting();
_isRunning= true;
}
private void ShowProgressText(string txt)
{
var count = 0;
var logText = new StringBuilder();
logText.Append(txt);
var baseLen = logText.Length;
while (!_isRunning)
{
Thread.Sleep(250);
if (count >= 3)
{
logText.Remove(baseLen, count);
count = 0;
}
logText.Append(".");
count++;
BeginInvoke(new Action(() => { UpdateProgressText(logText.ToString()); }));
}
BeginInvoke(new Action(() => { UpdateProgressText(txt + " - Complete"); }));
Thread.Sleep(2000);
}
private void UpdateProgressText(string txt)
{
lblProgress.Text = txt;
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
LoadRapport();
}
}
}
Consider this simple example with CancellationToken usage. I don't suggest bool, it's not Thread-safe.
private async void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
IProgress<string> progress = new Progress<string>(s => lblProgress.Text = s);
using (CancellationTokenSource cts = new CancellationTokenSource());
{
Task animationTask = ProgressAnimationAsync(progress, cts.Token);
await DoSomeJobAsync();
// await Task.Run(() => DoSomeHeavyJob()); // uncomment for test
cts.Cancel();
await animationTask;
}
}
private async Task ProgressAnimationAsync(IProgress progress, CancellationToken token)
{
int i = 1;
while (!token.IsCancellationRequested)
{
progress.Report("Loading" + new string("." , i));
i = i == 3 ? 1 : i + 1;
await Task.Delay(250);
}
}
// as I/O-bound operation
private async Task DoSomeJobAsync()
{
await Task.Delay(10000);
}
// as CPU-bound operation
private void DoSomeHeavyJob()
{
Thread.Sleep(10000);
}
There's two different methods, you can test both.
Note: it's safe to use lblProgress.Text directly here, without IProgress synchronized callback. It's given here just for example. Create new Progress in UI Thread and you may call .Report() from any other Thread safely without Invoke or BeginInvoke.
You can learn more about X-bound operations here.
I am new to Dataflow, and I follow this walkthrough How to: Cancel a Dataflow Block.
I click add button first, and then click cancel, but I got exception about "A task was canceled Exception" after clicking cancel button. I fail to find any way to resolve this error.
Any help would be appreciated.
Update:
Code for demo:
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
CancellationTokenSource cancellationTokenSource;
TransformBlock<WorkItem, WorkItem> startWork;
ActionBlock<WorkItem> completeWork;
ActionBlock<ToolStripProgressBar> incProgress;
ActionBlock<ToolStripProgressBar> decProgress;
TaskScheduler uiTaskScheduler;
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
uiTaskScheduler = TaskScheduler.FromCurrentSynchronizationContext();
Cancel.Enabled = false;
}
private void Add_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (!Cancel.Enabled)
{
CreatePipeline();
Cancel.Enabled = true;
}
for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++)
{
toolStripProgressBar1.Value++;
startWork.Post(new WorkItem());
}
}
private async void Cancel_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Add.Enabled = false;
Cancel.Enabled = false;
cancellationTokenSource.Cancel();
try
{
await Task.WhenAll(
completeWork.Completion,
incProgress.Completion,
decProgress.Completion);
}
catch (OperationCanceledException)
{
throw;
}
toolStripProgressBar4.Value += toolStripProgressBar1.Value;
toolStripProgressBar4.Value += toolStripProgressBar2.Value;
// Reset the progress bars that track the number of active work items.
toolStripProgressBar1.Value = 0;
toolStripProgressBar2.Value = 0;
// Enable the Add Work Items button.
Add.Enabled = true;
}
private void CreatePipeline()
{
cancellationTokenSource = new CancellationTokenSource();
startWork = new TransformBlock<WorkItem, WorkItem>(workItem =>
{
workItem.DoWork(250, cancellationTokenSource.Token);
decProgress.Post(toolStripProgressBar1);
incProgress.Post(toolStripProgressBar2);
return workItem;
},
new ExecutionDataflowBlockOptions
{
CancellationToken = cancellationTokenSource.Token
});
completeWork = new ActionBlock<WorkItem>(workItem =>
{
workItem.DoWork(1000, cancellationTokenSource.Token);
decProgress.Post(toolStripProgressBar2);
incProgress.Post(toolStripProgressBar3);
},
new ExecutionDataflowBlockOptions
{
CancellationToken = cancellationTokenSource.Token,
MaxDegreeOfParallelism = 2
});
startWork.LinkTo(completeWork);
startWork.Completion.ContinueWith(delegate { completeWork.Complete(); },cancellationTokenSource.Token);
incProgress = new ActionBlock<ToolStripProgressBar>(progress =>
{
progress.Value++;
},
new ExecutionDataflowBlockOptions
{
CancellationToken = cancellationTokenSource.Token,
TaskScheduler = uiTaskScheduler
});
decProgress = new ActionBlock<ToolStripProgressBar>(progress => progress.Value--,
new ExecutionDataflowBlockOptions
{
CancellationToken = cancellationTokenSource.Token,
TaskScheduler = uiTaskScheduler
});
}
class WorkItem
{
public void DoWork(int milliseconds, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
if (cancellationToken.IsCancellationRequested == false)
{
Thread.Sleep(milliseconds);
}
}
}
}
As #SirRufo pointed out, the solution to your question is simply don't re-throw the exception after you've caught it. But to highlight some of the other techniques you can use with dataflow as discussed in the comments I put together a small sample. I've tried to keep the spirit and intent of your original code intact. To that end; the original code didn't show how the flow would complete normally, as opposed to cancelled, so I left it out here as well.
using System;
using System.Data;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Threading.Tasks.Dataflow;
using System.Windows.Forms;
namespace WindowsFormsApp1 {
public partial class Form1 : Form {
private CancellationTokenSource cancellationTokenSource;
private TransformBlock<WorkItem, WorkItem> startWork;
private ActionBlock<WorkItem> completeWork;
private IProgress<int> progressBar1Value;
private IProgress<int> progressBar2Value;
public Form1() {
InitializeComponent();
btnCancel.Enabled = false;
}
private async void btnAdd_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
if(!btnCancel.Enabled) {
CreatePipeline();
btnCancel.Enabled = true;
}
var data = Enumerable.Range(0, 20).Select(_ => new WorkItem());
foreach(var workItem in data) {
await startWork.SendAsync(workItem);
progressBar1.Value++;
}
}
private async void btnCancel_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
btnAdd.Enabled = false;
btnCancel.Enabled = false;
cancellationTokenSource.Cancel();
await completeWork.Completion.ContinueWith(tsk => this.Invoke(new Action(() => this.Text = "Flow Cancelled")),
TaskContinuationOptions.OnlyOnCanceled);
progressBar4.Value += progressBar1.Value;
progressBar4.Value += progressBar2.Value;
// Reset the progress bars that track the number of active work items.
progressBar1.Value = 0;
progressBar2.Value = 0;
// Enable the Add Work Items button.
btnAdd.Enabled = true;
}
private void CreatePipeline() {
cancellationTokenSource = new CancellationTokenSource();
progressBar1Value = new Progress<int>(_ => progressBar1.Value++);
progressBar2Value = new Progress<int>(_ => progressBar2.Value++);
startWork = new TransformBlock<WorkItem, WorkItem>(async workItem => {
await workItem.DoWork(250, cancellationTokenSource.Token);
progressBar1Value.Report(0); //Value is ignored since the progressbar value is simply incremented
progressBar2Value.Report(0); //Value is ignored since the progressbar value is simply incremented
return workItem;
},
new ExecutionDataflowBlockOptions {
CancellationToken = cancellationTokenSource.Token
});
completeWork = new ActionBlock<WorkItem>(async workItem => {
await workItem.DoWork(1000, cancellationTokenSource.Token);
progressBar1Value.Report(0); //Value is ignored since the progressbar value is simply incremented
progressBar2Value.Report(0); //Value is ignored since the progressbar value is simply incremented
},
new ExecutionDataflowBlockOptions {
CancellationToken = cancellationTokenSource.Token,
MaxDegreeOfParallelism = 2
});
startWork.LinkTo(completeWork, new DataflowLinkOptions() { PropagateCompletion = true });
}
}
public class WorkItem {
public async Task DoWork(int milliseconds, CancellationToken cancellationToken) {
if(cancellationToken.IsCancellationRequested == false) {
await Task.Delay(milliseconds);
}
}
}
}
After checking the code, I released that the tasks will be cancelled if I click Cancel.
await Task.WhenAll(
completeWork.Completion,
incProgress.Completion,
decProgress.Completion);
But, above code Task.WhenAll need all of the tasks return complete status, then the "A task was canceled Exception" throw as expected if it returned cancelled instead of completed.
For a possible way to resolve this issue, we should return Task completed if we cancelled the task, and the code below works for me.
await Task.WhenAll(
completeWork.Completion.ContinueWith(task => cancelWork(task, "completeWork"), TaskContinuationOptions.OnlyOnCanceled),
incProgress.Completion.ContinueWith(task => cancelWork(task, "incProgress"), TaskContinuationOptions.OnlyOnCanceled),
decProgress.Completion.ContinueWith(task => cancelWork(task, "decProgress"), TaskContinuationOptions.OnlyOnCanceled));
Is it reasonable?
I want to build a folder cleaner program. It is expected to report deleted files to a TextBox control at real-time. So I use await Task.Run(() => CleanFolder(folderPath, progress)) function in my button click event. But the UI blocked when running. After a while when the CheanFolder() method run complete, all the deleted files are showed at one time.
namespace FolderCleaner
{
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
string folderPath;
string matchPattern;
private void ButtonOpen_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
FolderBrowserDialog fbd = new FolderBrowserDialog() { Description = "Select a folder" };
if (fbd.ShowDialog() == System.Windows.Forms.DialogResult.OK)
{
folderPath = fbd.SelectedPath;
textBoxPath.Text = folderPath;
buttonClean.IsEnabled = true;
textBoxList.Text = "Folder path: " + folderPath + "\n";
}
}
private async void ButtonClean_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
matchPattern = textBoxPattern.Text;
buttonOpen.IsEnabled = false;
buttonClean.IsEnabled = false;
Progress<string> progress = new Progress<string>(msg =>
{
textBoxList.AppendText("File deleted: " + msg + "\n");
textBoxList.CaretIndex = textBoxList.Text.Length;
textBoxList.ScrollToEnd();
});
try
{
await Task.Run(() => CleanFolder(folderPath, progress));
textBoxList.AppendText("Mission complete!");
textBoxList.CaretIndex = textBoxList.Text.Length;
textBoxList.ScrollToEnd();
}
catch
{
System.Windows.MessageBox.Show("Error!");
}
finally
{
buttonOpen.IsEnabled = true;
}
}
private void CleanFolder(string path, IProgress<string> progress)
{
var filePaths = Directory.EnumerateFiles(path, "*.*", System.IO.SearchOption.AllDirectories);
foreach (var filePath in filePaths)
{
var matchResult = Regex.Match(filePath, matchPattern);
if (matchResult.Success)
{
File.Delete(filePath);
progress.Report(filePath);
}
}
}
}
}
GUI can`t be controlled from another thread.
But i think, that real problem is that concatenating of string and output to a TextBox is a very inefficient operation.
In your case it is better to show progress of removal in a single line or by using the progress bar.
Here is my solution of your problem (i`ve changed 2 methods):
private async void ButtonClean_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
matchPattern = textBoxPattern.Text;
buttonOpen.IsEnabled = false;
buttonClean.IsEnabled = false;
await Task.Run(() => CleanFolder(folderPath));
textBoxList.Text += "Mission complete!";
buttonOpen.IsEnabled = true;
}
private void CleanFolder(string path)
{
var filePaths = Directory.EnumerateFiles(path, "*.*", SearchOption.AllDirectories);
foreach (var filePath in filePaths)
{
var matchResult = Regex.Match(filePath, matchPattern);
if (matchResult.Success)
{
File.Delete(filePath);
System.Windows.Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(delegate
{
// this working fast
textBoxList.Text = "File deleted: " + filePath + "\n";
// this working slow and slower over time
//textBoxList.Text += "File deleted: " + filePath + "\n";
textBoxList.ScrollToEnd();
});
}
}
}
I hope this will help.
Thanks for everyone. Thanks to the book C# 6.0 in a nutshell
I have figured out the solution and have a better understanding of async/await.
First of all, Dispatcher.Invoke is not recommended to use since .Net Framework 4.5, task-based asynchrony has become the dominant pattern (using async/awit).
Second, there are a few principles of using async/await:
The expression after await must be a Task or Task<TResult>
object
If you use async modifier to a method, then the method dont
need to return aTaskmethod manually. The compile will wrap the
method as aTask` object.
If you use a method like async Task Foo(), you must use an await keyword in it.
If there is nothing to await, then remove the async modifier, return a Task object by using return Task.Run(() => { Do Something });. Now you can use await Foo() in the method that calling Foo().
Task Foo() can not operate UI, but async Task Foo() can.
I have the need to move some processes to async. I have 5 methods that I need to call individually and have run in the background so the user can continue on with their work.
The test code below seems to work... but I haven't been able to figure out how to return information (message) indicating that the a task has completed. The class will be called from a separate windows form so that the progress can be displayed....
from the form:
async void BtnGo_Click(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
label2.Text = #"Starting tasks...";
var progress = new Progress<string>(
p =>
{
label2.Text = p;
});
await TestTask.MyTestMain(progress);
}
the class:
public static class TestTask
{
public static Task MyTestMain(IProgress<string> pProgress)
{
return SomethingAsync(pProgress);
}
private static async Task SomethingAsync(IProgress<string> pProgress)
{
var t1 = SomeThing1(pProgress);
var t2 = SomeThing2(pProgress);
await Task.WhenAll(t1, t2);
if (pProgress != null) pProgress.Report(#"all tasks completed");
}
private static async Task SomeThing1()
{
await Task.Delay(9000);
var filename = #"c:\temp\tt1.txt";
if (File.Exists(filename))
File.Delete(filename);
using (TextWriter tw = new StreamWriter(filename))
{
await tw.WriteLineAsync(DateTime.Now.ToLongDateString());
}
if (pProgress != null) pProgress.Report(#"t1 completed");
}
private static async Task SomeThing2()
{
await Task.Delay(7000);
var filename = #"c:\temp\tt2.txt";
if (File.Exists(filename))
File.Delete(filename);
using (TextWriter tw = new StreamWriter(filename))
{
await tw.WriteLineAsync(DateTime.Now.ToLongDateString());
}
if (pProgress != null) pProgress.Report(#"t2 completed");
}
}
I would like know when each task has completed. Any help or direction would be appreciated.
EDIT
I have edited this post to reflect my changes... I still cannot get a progress report back to the UI... any thoughts?
You're doing IO bound work, you don't need to use thread-pool threads.
Transform your methods to use the async APIs of StreamWriter:
private static async Task FirstThingAsync()
{
var filename = #"c:\temp\tt1.txt";
if (File.Exists(filename))
File.Delete(filename);
using (TextWriter tw = new StreamWriter(filename))
{
await tw.WriteLineAsync(DateTime.Now);
}
}
Same for your second method, and then you can asynchronously wait on them concurrently:
private static async Task SomethingAsync()
{
var firstThing = FirstThingAsync();
var secondThing = SecondThingAsync();
await Task.WhenAll(firstThing, secondThing);
}
Edit:
You're never reaching your first Progress.Report call because your code is throwing an InvalidOperationException when you call t.Start() on a promise-style task:
t1.Start();
await t1;
t2.Start();
await t2;
The task returned from both method calls is a "hot task", meaning it's operation is already started. The docs on Task.Start say:
InvalidOperationException: The Task is not in a valid state to be
started. It may have already been started, executed, or canceled, or
it may have been created in a manner that doesn't support direct
scheduling.
The reason you're not seeing that exception is because you're swallowing it:
var t = SomethingAsync(pProgress);
When you don't await on the async operation. Your method calls should look like this:
public static Task MyTestMain(IProgress<string> pProgress)
{
return SomethingAsync(pProgress);
}
async void BtnGo_Click(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
label2.Text = #"Starting tasks...";
var progress = new Progress<string>(
p =>
{
label2.Text = p;
});
await TestTask.MyTestMain(progress);
}
I have to load two large files in parallels
so far I have this code
The code below is click button method
private async void MILoadLogFile_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
...
if (oFD.ShowDialog() == true)
{
await myLogSession.LoadCompassLogAsync(oFD.FileName);
await myLogSession.LoadCoreServiceLogAsync(oFD.FileName);
}
}
loading method:
public async Task LoadCompassLogAsync(String fileName)
{
StreamReader streamReader = new StreamReader(fileName);
if (fileName.Contains("Compass"))
{
...
try
{
using (streamReader)
{
//Console.Out.WriteLine("lineCount: " + lineCount);
while (((line = await streamReader.ReadLineAsync()) != null)
&& !CompassLogLoadCompleted)
{
...
loggingLvl = new LoggingLvl(eLoggingLvl);
CompassLogData cLD = new CompassLogData(id, dateTime, loggingLvl, threadId, loggingMessage);
await addRoCompassLogCollectionAsync(cLD);
}
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Console.WriteLine("The file could not be read:");
Console.WriteLine(e.Message);
}
}
}
the LoadCoreServiceLogAsync is almost identical to LoadCompassLogAsync.
The two loading methods runs sequentially. I want them to run in parallel.
Your code will run one task after the other. To run the two tasks in parallel you can use the Task.WaitAll method:
var loadCompassLogTask = myLogSession.LoadCompassLogAsync(oFD.FileName);
var loadCoreServiceLogTask = myLogSession.LoadCoreServiceLogAsync(oFD.FileName);
Task.WaitAll(loadCompassLogTask, loadCoreServiceLogTask);
Or if you want to use await you can use Task.WhenAll:
var loadCompassLogTask = myLogSession.LoadCompassLogAsync(oFD.FileName);
var loadCoreServiceLogTask = myLogSession.LoadCoreServiceLogAsync(oFD.FileName);
await Task.WhenAll(loadCompassLogTask, loadCoreServiceLogTask);